Pith. sign in

REVIEW

The distribution of SNRs with Galactocentric radius

Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.

This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.

SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event

T0 review · schema-true

One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.

pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp

arxiv 1208.3107 v2 pith:VJJMW2WN submitted 2012-08-15 astro-ph.GA astro-ph.HE

classification astro-ph.GAastro-ph.HE
keywords distributionsnrsgalactocentricradiusbrightdistancesdistributionseffects
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal
0 comments
read the original abstract

In order to determine the Galactic distribution of supernova remnants (SNRs) there are two main difficulties: (i) there are selection effects which mean that catalogues of SNRs are not complete, and (ii) distances are not available for most SNRs, so distance estimates from the `Sigma-D' relation are used. Here I compare the observed distribution of 69 `bright' SNRs with Galactic longitude with that expected from the projection of various model Galactocentric radius distributions. This does not require distances from the `Sigma-D' relation, and selecting only `bright' remnants aims to avoid major issues with the selection effects. Although this method does not provide a direct inversion to the 3-D distribution of SNRs in the Galaxy, it does provide useful constraints on the Galactocentric radius distribution. For a combined power-law/exponential model for SNR surface density variation with Galactocentric radius, the best fitted distributions are more concentrated towards lower radii than the distribution derived by Case & Bhattacharya.

Discussion (0). Sign in to comment.

Pith tools