pith. sign in

arxiv: 1111.1950 · v1 · pith:VJXPMSIAnew · submitted 2011-11-07 · 🧮 math.NT · math.CA

Exact & Numerical Tests of Generalised Root Identities for non-integer μ

classification 🧮 math.NT math.CA
keywords arbitraryrootidentitiesesarogeneralisedzetagammanumerical
0
0 comments X
read the original abstract

We consider the generalised root identities introduced in [1] for simple functions, and also for \Gamma(z+1) and \zeta(s). In this paper, unlike [1], we focus on the case of noninteger \mu. For the simplest function f(z)=z, and hence for arbitrary polynomials, we show that they are satisfied for arbitrary real {\mu} (and hence for arbitrary complex {\mu} by analytic continuation). Using this, we then develop an asymptotic formula for the derivative side of the root identities for \Gamma(z+1) at arbitrary real \mu, from which we are able to demonstrate numerically that \Gamma(z+1) also satisfies the generalised root identities for arbitrary \mu, not just integer values. Finally we examine the generalised root identites for {\zeta} also for non-integer values of \mu. Having shown in [1] that {\zeta} satisfies these identities exactly for integer \mu>1 (and also for \mu=1 after removal of an obstruction), in this paper we present strong numerical evidence first that {\zeta} satisfies them for arbitrary \mu>1 where the root side is classically convergent, and then that this continues to be true also for -1<\mu<1 where C\'esaro divergences must be removed and C\'esaro averaging of the residual partial-sum functions is required (when \mu<0). Careful consideration of a neighbourhood of \mu=0 also sheds light on the appearance of the 2d ln-divergence that was handled heuristically in [1] and why the assignment of 2d C\'esaro limit 0 to this in [1] is justified. The numerical calculations for \mu>0 are bundled in portable R-code; the code for the case -1<\mu<0, including the C\'esaro averaging required when \mu<0, is in VBA. Both the R-scripts and XL spreadsheet are made available with this paper, along with supporting files, and can be readily used to further verify these claims.

This paper has not been read by Pith yet.

discussion (0)

Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.