Pith. sign in

REVIEW 4 major objections 5 minor 1 cited by

JWST Discovery of Warm Dust in the Circumgalactic Medium of the Makani Galaxy

T0 review · 4 major / 5 minor · reviewed 2026-08-06 · deepseek-v4-flash

Challenge this review Re-run · record.json Download PDF Read on arXiv ↗ Review JSON

Pith's one-line read JWST detects PAH emission out to about 35 kpc in the wind of the Makani galaxy, evidence that starburst-ejected dust survives into the circumgalactic medium but erodes along the way.

desk verdict Plausible but not yet secure: the PAH survival/erosion claim rests on one outer aperture and an unquantified PSF subtraction. read the letter →

arxiv 2507.08098 v1 pith:VKOLTGRS submitted 2025-07-10 astro-ph.GA

Sylvain Veilleux , Steven D. Shockley , Marcio Melendez , David S. N. Rupke , Alison L. Coil , Aleksandar M. Diamond-Stanic , James E. Geach , Ryan C. Hickox
show 5 more authors
John Moustakas Gregory H. Rudnick Paul H. Sell Christy A. Tremonti Hojoon Cha
This is my paper · ORCID
classification astro-ph.GA
keywords galacticwindscircumgalacticmediumpolycyclicaromatichydrocarbonsstarburstgalaxiesdustsurvivalJWSTMIRINIRCam
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal

The pith

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The reading

This paper claims that JWST's near- and mid-infrared images of the Makani galaxy, a compact post-starburst galaxy at redshift z = 0.459 with a 100-kpc-scale wind, reveal emission from polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons (PAHs) out to roughly 35 kpc. The detection takes advantage of a coincidental alignment between Makani's redshifted PAH features at 3.3, 7.7, and 11.3+12.2 microns and the bandpasses of specific NIRCam and MIRI filters. The observed F1800W/F1130W flux ratio, which traces the PAH (11.3+12.2)/7.7 ratio, declines from the nucleus to the inner halo (10–20 kpc) and outer halo (20–35 kpc), indicating that the PAHs are more weakly illuminated, smaller, and more ionized with distance. The paper presents this as the most direct evidence to date that dust ejected by a galactic wind survives the roughly $10^{8}$-year journey into the circumgalactic medium while being progressively eroded.

What carries the argument

The central mechanism is the coincidental redshift match: at z = 0.459, the NIRCam F480M filter and MIRI F1130W, F1800W, and F2550W filters align with the redshifted PAH 3.3, 7.7, 11.3+12.2 micron features and the H2 17.03 micron line, while F770W and F2100W sample clean continuum. The analysis subtracts a synthetic JWST point-spread function (built from in-flight wavefront measurements) to reveal faint extended emission around the bright nucleus. The F1800W/F1130W flux ratio serves as a proxy for the PAH (11.3+12.2)/7.7 ratio, and comparison with the Draine et al. (2021) model grid maps the measured ratios onto starlight intensity, PAH size distribution, and PAH ionization fraction.

What would settle it

A deep MIRI medium-resolution spectrum of the NW cloud complex at 20–35 kpc that fails to show the PAH 7.7 or 11.3 micron features at the photometrically detected flux levels, or an improved PSF model that removes the extended emission, would falsify the PAH detection in the circumgalactic medium.

Watch

Extended reading notes

Core claim

On the paper's own terms, the central discovery is that PAH emission is present in the warm-ionized gas of Makani's outer wind, out to ~35 kpc in the northwest cloud complex, well beyond the cool molecular and neutral-atomic gas traced by CO(2-1) and Mg II (which end near 20 kpc), but not as far as the warm ionized gas traced by [O II]. After subtracting a synthetic point-spread-function model of the bright nucleus, the F1130W and F1800W images show extended emission, with measured F1800W/F1130W ratios of ~1.4 in the nucleus, ~0.83 in the inner halo, and ~0.70 in the outer halo. These ratios, interpreted with a library of PAH emission models, imply decreasing starlight intensity, decreasing PAH sizes, and increasing PAH ionization fractions with radius. The authors interpret the survival of PAHs at 30–35 kpc as evidence that dust can reach the circumgalactic medium despite the harsh wind environment, and the radial trends as evidence of dust erosion on the outflow dynamical timescale of ~0.1 Gyr, possibly mitigated by cloud-wind mixing and condensation that shields dust within cool clouds.

Load-bearing premise

The extended F1130W and F1800W emission seen after subtracting the synthetic point-spread function is genuinely PAH radiation from Makani's outflow, not residual PSF artifacts or unmodeled field galaxies.

Editorial extensions

If this is right

  • If the detection stands, PAH molecules are present in the circumgalactic medium at 30–35 kpc, implying that dust ejected by the starburst wind survives at least ~10^8 years in the halo.
  • The radial decline in F1800W/F1130W indicates that PAHs become smaller and more ionized with distance, providing the first evidence of dust evolution on a ~10^8-year outflow timescale, in contrast to the increasing PAH 11.3/7.7 ratio seen in M82's wind over ~10^6 years.
  • The roughly constant PAH-to-CO and PAH-to-Mg II flux ratios out to 20 kpc are consistent with cool gas coexisting with dust beyond the current detection limits of ALMA and KCWI, meaning the apparent truncation of cool gas may be a sensitivity effect.
  • The cloud-shielding mechanism invoked to explain dust survival predicts that cool clouds carrying dust can persist for roughly 80 sputtering times, matching the observed extent of PAH emission at 30–35 kpc.
  • The upper limits on PAH 3.3 and 5-micron continuum emission in the halo are consistent with the low starlight intensities inferred from the main flux ratio, though they do not independently constrain PAH properties.
  • Deeper JWST, ALMA, or KCWI observations could detect warm dust and cool gas beyond 35 kpc, or establish that the wind's dust content genuinely ends there.

Reading between the lines

Editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • A direct test of the PAH identification would be a MIRI medium-resolution slit or IFU spectrum of the NW cloud complex: if the 7.7 and 11.3 micron features are not seen at the photometric flux levels, the bandpass-coincidence argument would be weakened.
  • The radial F1800W/F1130W gradient, if confirmed in other wind galaxies, could serve as a dust-erosion chronometer, encoding the local hot-gas density and outflow timescale in a single observable ratio.
  • The apparent conflict between the JWST dust detection and the H-alpha/H-beta reddening non-detection beyond 25 kpc may be resolved if sputtering fragments PAHs into grains too small to cause significant optical reddening, meaning the dust column is present but not picked up in E(B-V).
  • If cool gas indeed extends beyond 20 kpc as the constant PAH/CO and PAH/Mg II ratios suggest, then the standard interpretation of Makani's wind as showing cool-cloud dissolution in the CGM would need revision toward a sensitivity-limited picture.
Share X Bluesky LinkedIn Reddit HN

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, and a circularity audit.

Referee Report

4 major / 5 minor

Summary. The paper presents JWST NIRCam and MIRI imaging of the Makani galaxy at z=0.459, a compact post-starburst galaxy with a 100-kpc-scale starburst-driven wind. By subtracting a synthetic STPSF model, the authors report extended emission in F1130W (tracing rest-frame PAH 7.7 um) and F1800W (tracing PAH 11.3+12.2 um) out to approximately 35 kpc, with weaker detections in F480M and F770W. Flux densities are measured in the nucleus, an inner-halo annulus, and two outer-halo apertures (Table 2). Comparing the F1800W/F1130W ratio with the Draine et al. (2021) model grid, the authors infer that the starlight intensity decreases, the PAH sizes decrease, and the PAH ionization fraction increases with radius, concluding that dust ejected by the wind survives to the CGM but is eroded on a timescale of about 10^8 years. The paper also discusses thermal sputtering and cloud-wind mixing as possible survival mechanisms.

Significance. If the detections and the inferred radial trends hold, this would be the first direct detection of PAH-bearing dust in a galactic wind at circumgalactic scales, providing strong empirical evidence for dust survival and evolution in outflows. The observational strategy is clever: exploiting the redshift coincidence to place PAH features in JWST filter bandpasses, and the paper connects the new mid-infrared data to existing ALMA, KCWI, and Keck/ESI observations of the same system. The data are public, and the authors are transparent about several limitations, such as the detection limits of the F2550W and F187N images. However, the headline claims depend heavily on the reliability of the STPSF subtraction at large radii, on the interpretation of a single color ratio, and on resolving the unexplained asymmetry between the two outer-halo apertures. These issues are addressable but currently leave the central conclusion conditional.

major comments (4)
  1. [Section 3.1] The PSF-subtraction systematics are not quantified. The text states that 'discrepancies between predicted and observed flux persist' but no residual budget, empirical PSF check, or comparison with an independent point source is provided. The nucleus is roughly 600 times brighter than the outer apertures in F1130W (2.32 mJy versus 3.7 microJy), so a small fractional error in the PSF model can produce microJy-level spurious flux. I request a quantitative residual analysis: for example, subtract the STPSF model from a synthetic point-source image (or from a field star) at the same detector positions and show that the residuals are below the claimed outer-halo fluxes at radii of 3-6 arcseconds.
  2. [Section 4.2 and Table 2] The radial trend in PAH properties is inferred from only one outer-halo aperture. CGM-E has F1130W = 3.7 +/- 0.3 microJy and F1800W = 2.6 +/- 0.3 microJy, giving a ratio of 0.70, while CGM-W at a similar radius has F1130W = 3.8 +/- 0.3 microJy but F1800W < 0.4 microJy, a factor greater than 6 lower. This asymmetry is not discussed and is not expected for a coherent, radially varying dust population. The authors should address whether the F1800W emission in CGM-E is real or could be residual PSF structure, and should justify the use of only CGM-E for the outer-halo ratio in the erosion interpretation.
  3. [Section 3.2 and Table 1] The potential contamination of F1800W by redshifted [Ne II] 12.8 um is dismissed based on the nuclear spectrum and M82 measurements, but the outer apertures are in the warm-ionized wind where the [Ne II]/PAH ratio can be higher. The F2100W nondetection (upper limit 0.3 microJy) could bound the [Ne II] contribution if a [Ne II]/[Ne III] ratio is assumed, but this check is not shown. I request an explicit estimate of the maximum [Ne II] flux consistent with the F2100W limit and a demonstration that the F1800W/F1130W ratio in CGM-E is not significantly affected.
  4. [Section 4.2 and Figure 7] The inference of decreasing PAH sizes and increasing ionization fractions relies on fixing log U = 0 for the inner and outer halos, described in the text as 'appropriate' without data-driven justification. With only one measured ratio (F1800W/F1130W) and two upper limits, the parameter space of log U, fsize, and fion is highly degenerate. The statement that the measured ratios 'can only be reproduced if the starlight intensity is low, the PAH sizes are smaller, and the ionization fractions are elevated' is stronger than the evidence supports. A grid-based fit (e.g., chi-squared contours) or an explicit discussion of degeneracies is needed before claiming radial changes in all three parameters.
minor comments (5)
  1. [Section 3.3] The text identifies blue circles as possible galaxies in the field, but does not explicitly state that these sources are excluded from the photometric apertures, particularly the outer-halo apertures shown in Figure 6. Please clarify.
  2. [Abstract and Section 4.2] The abstract states that the flux ratios indicate decreasing starlight intensity, decreasing PAH sizes, and increasing ionization, but the model comparison fixes log U = 0 for the halo regions; the wording should be softened or the evidence for a varying starlight intensity should be presented explicitly.
  3. [Figure 1 caption] The caption cites 'Erena et al. 2025, in prep.' for the nuclear spectrum, but this work is not listed in the references; please add a reference or indicate the status clearly.
  4. [Section 4.1, Equation (1)] The sputtering timescale formula appears dimensionally unusual with the factor [(10^6.3 K / T)^omega + 1] and omega = 2.5; please verify the expression against the cited sources and check the units.
  5. [Table 2] The column labeled 'Main Diagnostics' in Table 2 repeats information from Table 1 and could be removed for clarity.

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged · score 0.0 of 10

No significant circularity: the central detection and ratio interpretation are measured directly and compared against an external model grid, not derived from the conclusions.

full rationale

The paper's central claims are (1) PAH emission detected to ~35 kpc after STPSF subtraction, and (2) radial decrease of F1800W/F1130W implying smaller/more ionized PAHs. The fluxes are measured directly from JWST images (Table 2); no parameter is fitted to the target data and then relabeled as a prediction. The physical interpretation in Section 4.2 compares the observed filter ratios to the independent Draine et al. (2021) model grid, with fixed log U = 0 for the halos; the choice of log U is an explicit assumption, not an output of the model fit. The companion-paper robustness check (Shockley et al. 2025, in prep.) is a self-citation, but it is used only to justify the adopted stellar template, and the main comparison to Draine et al. remains external and falsifiable. The STPSF residual systematics are a real observational concern but are not a circularity: they concern whether the measured fluxes are genuine, not whether the inference reduces to its inputs. No equation in the paper defines a derived quantity in terms of itself. Score 0.

Assumptions & free parameters 3 free parameters · 6 assumptions · 0 invented entities

The paper introduces no new entities; instead it leans on several external model libraries and adopted physical assumptions. The main free parameters are the Draine grid parameters U, fsize, and fion that are matched to one photometric ratio after fixing U.

free parameters (3)
  • log U (starlight intensity relative to solar neighborhood) = log U = 0 adopted for inner and outer halo comparison; high in nucleus
    The physical claims about PAH size and ionization are read off model grids at fixed log U = 0 in Section 4.2 and Figure 7. This value is assumed rather than measured, and the inferred trends depend on it.
  • PAH size distribution parameter fsize = sma (smaller than standard) in halos
    Inferred by matching the measured F1800W/F1130W ratio to the Draine et al. (2021) grid; only weakly constrained because the same ratio can be affected by starlight intensity and ionization.
  • PAH ionization fraction fion = hi (elevated) in halos
    Inferred from the same grid matching; one observed ratio plus upper limits is used to separate three model parameters, so the value is model-dependent.
assumptions (6)
  • domain assumption STPSF v2.0.0 accurately models the JWST PSF at the time of observation, including the MIRI cruciform artifact
    The extended emission is only visible after subtracting this synthetic PSF from the bright nucleus (Section 3.1); the authors note residual discrepancies between predicted and observed flux.
  • domain assumption The Draine et al. (2021) PAH and dust emission library correctly predicts the relative NIRCam and MIRI filter fluxes as a function of U, fsize, and fion
    Used in Section 4.2 and Figure 7 to convert measured F1800W/F1130W and other ratios into statements about PAH size and ionization.
  • domain assumption The heating radiation field is approximated by a Bruzual and Charlot 10 Myr, solar-metallicity stellar population
    Adopted in Section 4.2 for the model grid; the authors cite an unpublished companion paper for a 5% insensitivity claim.
  • domain assumption Contamination of F1800W and F2100W by [Ne II] and [Ne III] is negligible, below about 5%
    Stated in Section 3.2 based on the nuclear spectrum and M82 wind ratios; no direct measurement in the outer apertures.
  • domain assumption Pressure equilibrium between warm and hot gas phases holds at R about 20 kpc, and the hot-phase electron density upper limit is not overestimated by more than roughly 10^3 to 10^4
    Used in Section 4.1 to estimate sputtering timescales; if the density is far lower, dust could survive longer.
  • domain assumption Equal-velocity entrainment with v = 300 km/s gives the outflow dynamical time tdyn = R/v
    Section 4.1 compares this to sputtering timescales to argue PAHs should be destroyed; if grains travel faster or slower, the comparison shifts.

how reviews work

0 comments
Cite this review

Pith. "Pith review of JWST Discovery of Warm Dust in the Circumgalactic Medium of the Makani Galaxy." pith.science (2026). https://pith.science/paper/VKOLTGRS

@misc{pith2026250708098,
  author       = {Pith},
  title        = {Pith review of: JWST Discovery of Warm Dust in the Circumgalactic Medium of the Makani Galaxy},
  year         = {2026},
  howpublished = {\url{https://pith.science/paper/VKOLTGRS}},
  note         = {Machine review of arXiv:2507.08098}
}
read the original abstract

We report the detection of near- and mid-infrared emission from polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons (PAHs) out to ~ 35 kpc in the Makani Galaxy, a compact massive galaxy with a record-breaking 100-kpc scale starburst-driven wind at redshift z = 0.459. The NIRCam and MIRI observations with JWST take advantage of a coincidental match between the PAH spectral features at 3.3, 7.7, and (11.3 + 12.2) microns in Makani and the bandpasses of the MIRI and NIRCam filters. The warm dust is not only detected in the cool-gas tracers of the galactic wind associated with the more recent (7 Myr) starburst episode, but also in the outer warm-ionized gas wind produced by the older (0.4 Gyr) episode. The presence of PAHs in the outer wind indicates that the PAHs have survived the long (R/v ~ 10^8 yrs) journey to the halo despite the harsh environment of the galactic wind. The measured F1800W/F1130W flux ratios in the unresolved nucleus, inner halo (R = 10 - 20 kpc), and outer halo (R = 20 - 35 kpc), tracers of the PAH (11.3 + 12.2)/7.7 ratios, indicate decreasing starlight intensity incident on the PAHs, decreasing PAH sizes, and increasing PAH ionization fractions with increasing distance from the nucleus. These data provide the strongest evidence to date that the ejected dust of galactic winds survives the long journey to the CGM, but is eroded along the way.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2507.08098 by the authors.

Figure 1
Figure 1. The transmission curves of both the NIRCam and MIRI filters are overlaid on the nuclear spectrum of Makani (from Erena et al. 2025, in prep.; thick line) and one of the model spectra of B. T. Draine et al. (2021, thin line). The wavelength is in the observer’s frame. The left axis shows the normalized spectral intensity and the right axis indi￾cates the filter throughput. Several filters are centered on distinct PAH… view at source ↗
Figure 2
Figure 2. The top-left panel shows the stellar emission of Makani at rest-frame ∼ 5600 ˚A mapped in the HST F814W filter. The grey scale for that panel is in counts sec−1 pixel−1 . The other panels show the flux maps of the dust emission (orange contours) in the JWST NIRCam F480M and MIRI F770W, F1130W, F1800W, and F2100W filters after PSF subtraction with STPSF. The field of view of each panel is approximately 100 × 100 kpc.… view at source ↗
Figure 3
Figure 3. Same as [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p005_3.png] view at source ↗
Figures from the paper (4 more)
Figure 4
Figure 4. Figure 4: Same as [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p006_4.png]
Figure 5
Figure 5. Figure 5: (a) Radial surface brightness profiles in the JWST filters (after PSF subtraction with STPSF), the HST F814W filter, which probes starlight near ∼ 5600 ˚A, and the line emission in CO (2-1) (within [−500, +500] km s−1 ). (b) Same as (a) but for [O II] 3727 ˚A and Mg II…
Figure 6
Figure 6. Figure 6: Same as [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p008_6.png]
Figure 7
Figure 7. Figure 7: Measured and predicted filter flux ratios. The values of F1800W/F1130W are shown in the left panels, while F480M/F1130W and F770W/F1130W are shown in the right panels. The measured values are shown as thick, semi-transparent horizontal lines. Their colors refer to the …

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Forward citations

Cited by 1 Pith paper

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score. Full citation record

  1. Survival is not Enough: Dust Sputtering, Growth, and H$_2$ Formation in Galactic Winds

    astro-ph.GA 2026-07 conditional novelty 7.5 of 10

    Entrained clouds form high H2 fractions only with dust growth at densities ≳10–30 times the cloud-survival critical density; without growth, DGR dilution and sputtering keep them atomic.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

53 extracted references · 3 canonical work pages · cited by 1 Pith paper

  1. [1]

    W., Fielding, D

    Abruzzo, M. W., Fielding, D. B., & Bryan, G. L. 2023, arXiv e-prints, arXiv:2307.03228, doi: 10.48550/arXiv.2307.03228

    arXiv doi:10.48550/arxiv.2307.03228 2023

  2. [2]

    2016, MNRAS, 462, 4157, doi: 10.1093/mnras/stw1930 Astropy Collaboration, Robitaille, T

    Armillotta, L., Fraternali, F., & Marinacci, F. 2016, MNRAS, 462, 4157, doi: 10.1093/mnras/stw1930 Astropy Collaboration, Robitaille, T. P., Tollerud, E. J., et al. 2013, A&A, 558, A33, doi: 10.1051/0004-6361/201322068 Astropy Collaboration, Price-Whelan, A. M., Sip˝ ocz, B. M., et al. 2018, AJ, 156, 123, doi: 10.3847/1538-3881/aabc4f Banda-Barrag´ an, W....

    doi:10.1093/mnras/stw1930 2016

  3. [3]

    2018, MNRAS, 475, 5688, doi: 10.1093/mnras/sty216

    Biernacki, P., & Teyssier, R. 2018, MNRAS, 475, 5688, doi: 10.1093/mnras/sty216

    doi:10.1093/mnras/sty216 2018

  4. [4]

    D., Levy, R

    Bolatto, A. D., Levy, R. C., Tarantino, E., et al. 2024, ApJ, 967, 63, doi: 10.3847/1538-4357/ad33c8

    doi:10.3847/1538-4357/ad33c8 2024

  5. [5]

    S., et al

    Brennan, R., Choi, E., Somerville, R. S., et al. 2018, ApJ, 860, 14, doi: 10.3847/1538-4357/aac2c4 14 Veilleux al

    doi:10.3847/1538-4357/aac2c4 2018

  6. [6]

    2003, MNRAS, 344, 1000, doi: 10.1046/j.1365-8711.2003.06897.x

    Bruzual, G., & Charlot, S. 2003, MNRAS, 344, 1000, doi: 10.1046/j.1365-8711.2003.06897.x

    arXiv 2003

  7. [7]

    2018, ApJ, 866, 91, doi: 10.3847/1538-4357/aae076 Dav´ e, R., Angl´ es-Alc´ azar, D., Narayanan, D., et al

    Hirschmann, M. 2018, ApJ, 866, 91, doi: 10.3847/1538-4357/aae076 Dav´ e, R., Angl´ es-Alc´ azar, D., Narayanan, D., et al. 2019, MNRAS, 486, 2827, doi: 10.1093/mnras/stz937

    doi:10.3847/1538-4357/aae076 2018

  8. [8]

    2017, MNRAS, 471, 4476, doi: 10.1093/mnras/stx1879

    Vallini, L. 2017, MNRAS, 471, 4476, doi: 10.1093/mnras/stx1879

    work page doi:10.1093/mnras/stx1879 2017

Show all 53 references
  1. [9]

    T., Li, A., Hensley, B

    Draine, B. T., Li, A., Hensley, B. S., et al. 2021, ApJ, 917, 3, doi: 10.3847/1538-4357/abff51

    2021 doi

  2. [10]

    2016, MNRAS, 463, 3948, doi: 10.1093/mnras/stw2265

    Dubois, Y., Peirani, S., Pichon, C., et al. 2016, MNRAS, 463, 3948, doi: 10.1093/mnras/stw2265

    2016 doi

  3. [11]

    J., & Gronke, M

    Farber, R. J., & Gronke, M. 2022, MNRAS, 510, 551, doi: 10.1093/mnras/stab3412 Faucher-Gigu` ere, C.-A., & Oh, S. P. 2023, ARA&A, 61, 131, doi: 10.1146/annurev-astro-052920-125203

    2022 doi

  4. [12]

    2016, ApJ, 833, 46, doi: 10.3847/1538-4357/833/1/46

    Ferrara, A., & Scannapieco, E. 2016, ApJ, 833, 46, doi: 10.3847/1538-4357/833/1/46

    2016 doi

  5. [13]

    B., Bolatto, A

    Fisher, D. B., Bolatto, A. D., Chisholm, J., et al. 2025, MNRAS, 538, 3068, doi: 10.1093/mnras/staf363

    2025 doi

  6. [14]

    P., Mather, J

    Gardner, J. P., Mather, J. C., Abbott, R., et al. 2023, PASP, 135, 068001, doi: 10.1088/1538-3873/acd1b5

    2023 doi

  7. [15]

    Gronke, M., & Oh, S. P. 2018, MNRAS, 480, L111, doi: 10.1093/mnrasl/sly131

    2018 doi

  8. [16]

    Gronke, M., & Oh, S. P. 2020, MNRAS, 492, 1970, doi: 10.1093/mnras/stz3332

    2020 doi

  9. [17]

    2025, arXiv e-prints, arXiv:2503.20042, doi: 10.48550/arXiv.2503.20042

    Ha, T., Rupke, D., Caraker, S., et al. 2025, arXiv e-prints, arXiv:2503.20042, doi: 10.48550/arXiv.2503.20042

    2025 doi arXiv

  10. [18]

    2019, MNRAS, 488, 1248, doi: 10.1093/mnras/stz1773

    Hafen, Z., Faucher-Gigu` ere, C.-A., Angl´ es-Alc´ azar, D., et al. 2019, MNRAS, 488, 1248, doi: 10.1093/mnras/stz1773

    2019 doi

  11. [19]

    2015, MNRAS, 447, 2937, doi: 10.1093/mnras/stu2617

    Hirashita, H. 2015, MNRAS, 447, 2937, doi: 10.1093/mnras/stu2617

    2015 doi

  12. [20]

    F., Wetzel, A., Kereˇ s, D., et al

    Hopkins, P. F., Wetzel, A., Kereˇ s, D., et al. 2018, MNRAS, 480, 800, doi: 10.1093/mnras/sty1690

    2018 doi

  13. [21]

    S., & Naab, T

    Hu, C.-Y., Zhukovska, S., Somerville, R. S., & Naab, T. 2019, MNRAS, 487, 3252, doi: 10.1093/mnras/stz1481

    2019 doi

  14. [22]

    2021, MNRAS, 501, 1143, doi: 10.1093/mnras/staa3610

    Kanjilal, V., Dutta, A., & Sharma, P. 2021, MNRAS, 501, 1143, doi: 10.1093/mnras/staa3610

    2021 doi

  15. [23]

    F., Squire, J., & Hummels, C

    Li, Z., Hopkins, P. F., Squire, J., & Hummels, C. 2020, MNRAS, 492, 1841, doi: 10.1093/mnras/stz3567

    2020 doi

  16. [24]

    A., Mathur, S., Nguyen, D

    Lopez, L. A., Mathur, S., Nguyen, D. D., Thompson, T. A., & Olivier, G. M. 2020, ApJ, 904, 152, doi: 10.3847/1538-4357/abc010

    2020 doi

  17. [26]

    Mas-Ribas, L., McQuinn, M., & Prochaska, J. X. 2025, arXiv e-prints, arXiv:2504.19562, doi: 10.48550/arXiv.2504.19562

    2025 doi

  18. [27]

    E., Huff, E

    McCleary, J. E., Huff, E. M., Bartlett, J. W., & Hensley, B. S. 2025, arXiv e-prints, arXiv:2503.04098, doi: 10.48550/arXiv.2503.04098

    2025 doi

  19. [28]

    C., & Marinacci, F

    McKinnon, R., Torrey, P., Vogelsberger, M., Hayward, C. C., & Marinacci, F. 2017, MNRAS, 468, 1505, doi: 10.1093/mnras/stx467 M´ enard, B., Scranton, R., Fukugita, M., & Richards, G. 2010, MNRAS, 405, 1025, doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2966.2010.16486.x

    2017

  20. [29]

    R., Jones, A

    Micelotta, E. R., Jones, A. P., & Tielens, A. G. G. M. 2010a, A&A, 510, A37, doi: 10.1051/0004-6361/200911683

    doi

  21. [30]

    R., Jones, A

    Micelotta, E. R., Jones, A. P., & Tielens, A. G. G. M. 2010b, A&A, 510, A36, doi: 10.1051/0004-6361/200911682

    doi

  22. [31]

    Narayanan, D., Smith, J. D. T., Hensley, B. S., et al. 2023, ApJ, 951, 100, doi: 10.3847/1538-4357/accf8d

    2023 doi

  23. [32]

    2019, MNRAS, 490, 3234, doi: 10.1093/mnras/stz2306

    Nelson, D., Pillepich, A., Springel, V., et al. 2019, MNRAS, 490, 3234, doi: 10.1093/mnras/stz2306

    2019 doi

  24. [33]

    Peek, J. E. G., M´ enard, B., & Corrales, L. 2015, ApJ, 813, 7, doi: 10.1088/0004-637X/813/1/7

    2015 doi

  25. [34]

    S., Corlies, L., Tumlinson, J., et al

    Peeples, M. S., Corlies, L., Tumlinson, J., et al. 2019, ApJ, 873, 129, doi: 10.3847/1538-4357/ab0654

    2019 doi

  26. [35]

    D., Sivaramakrishnan, A., Lajoie, C.-P., et al

    Perrin, M. D., Sivaramakrishnan, A., Lajoie, C.-P., et al. 2014, in Society of Photo-Optical Instrumentation Engineers (SPIE) Conference Series, Vol. 9143, Space Telescopes and Instrumentation 2014: Optical, Infrared, and Millimeter Wave, ed. J. M. Oschmann, Jr., M. Clampin, G...

    2014 doi

  27. [36]

    M., Schneider, E

    Richie, H. M., Schneider, E. E., Abruzzo, M. W., & Torrey, P. 2024, ApJ, 974, 81, doi: 10.3847/1538-4357/ad6a1c

    2024 doi

  28. [37]

    2023, PASP, 135, 048001, doi: 10.1088/1538-3873/acb293

    Rigby, J., Perrin, M., McElwain, M., et al. 2023, PASP, 135, 048001, doi: 10.1088/1538-3873/acb293

    2023 doi

  29. [38]

    C., et al

    Rigopoulou, D., Barale, M., Clary, D. C., et al. 2021, MNRAS, 504, 5287, doi: 10.1093/mnras/stab959

    2021 doi

  30. [39]

    R., Garc ´ ıa-Bernete, I., et al

    Rigopoulou, D., Donnan, F. R., Garc ´ ıa-Bernete, I., et al. 2024, MNRAS, 532, 1598, doi: 10.1093/mnras/stae1535

    2024 doi

  31. [40]

    Rupke, D. S. N., Coil, A., Geach, J. E., et al. 2019, Nature, 574, 643, doi: 10.1038/s41586-019-1686-1

    2019 doi

  32. [41]

    Rupke, D. S. N., Coil, A. L., Perrotta, S., et al. 2023, ApJ, 947, 33, doi: 10.3847/1538-4357/acbfae

    2023 doi

  33. [42]

    2015, ApJ, 805, 158, doi: 10.1088/0004-637X/805/2/158 W arm Dust in the Circumgalactic Medium of Makani 15

    Scannapieco, E., & Br¨ uggen, M. 2015, ApJ, 805, 158, doi: 10.1088/0004-637X/805/2/158 W arm Dust in the Circumgalactic Medium of Makani 15

    2015 doi

  34. [43]

    A., Bower, R

    Schaye, J., Crain, R. A., Bower, R. G., et al. 2015, MNRAS, 446, 521, doi: 10.1093/mnras/stu2058

    2015 doi

  35. [44]

    Thompson, T. A. 2020, ApJ, 895, 43, doi: 10.3847/1538-4357/ab8ae8

    2020 doi

  36. [45]

    H., Tremonti, C

    Sell, P. H., Tremonti, C. A., Hickox, R. C., et al. 2014, MNRAS, 441, 3417, doi: 10.1093/mnras/stu636

    2014 doi

  37. [46]

    2020, MNRAS, 499, 4261, doi: 10.1093/mnras/staa3177

    Sparre, M., Pfrommer, C., & Ehlert, K. 2020, MNRAS, 499, 4261, doi: 10.1093/mnras/staa3177

    2020 doi

  38. [47]

    A., Quataert, E., Zhang, D., & Weinberg, D

    Thompson, T. A., Quataert, E., Zhang, D., & Weinberg, D. H. 2016, MNRAS, 455, 1830, doi: 10.1093/mnras/stv2428

    2016 doi

  39. [48]

    C., & Mathews, W

    Tsai, J. C., & Mathews, W. G. 1995, ApJ, 448, 84, doi: 10.1086/175943

    1995 doi

  40. [49]

    S., & Werk, J

    Tumlinson, J., Peeples, M. S., & Werk, J. K. 2017, ARA&A, 55, 389, doi: 10.1146/annurev-astro-091916-055240

    2017 doi

  41. [50]

    2005, ARA&A, 43, 769, doi: 10.1146/annurev.astro.43.072103.150610

    Veilleux, S., Cecil, G., & Bland-Hawthorn, J. 2005, ARA&A, 43, 769, doi: 10.1146/annurev.astro.43.072103.150610

    2005 arXiv

  42. [51]

    D., & Aalto, S

    Veilleux, S., Maiolino, R., Bolatto, A. D., & Aalto, S. 2020, A&A Rv, 28, 2, doi: 10.1007/s00159-019-0121-9

    2020 doi

  43. [52]

    D., Herrera-Camus, R., et al

    Villanueva, V., Bolatto, A. D., Herrera-Camus, R., et al. 2025, A&A, 695, A202, doi: 10.1051/0004-6361/202553891

    2025 doi

  44. [53]

    2014, MNRAS, 444, 1518, doi: 10.1093/mnras/stu1536

    Vogelsberger, M., Genel, S., Springel, V., et al. 2014, MNRAS, 444, 1518, doi: 10.1093/mnras/stu1536

    2014 doi

  45. [54]

    2023, ApJ, 956, 142, doi: 10.3847/1538-4357/acfa71

    Xu, X., Heckman, T., Yoshida, M., Henry, A., & Ohyama, Y. 2023, ApJ, 956, 142, doi: 10.3847/1538-4357/acfa71

    2023 doi

Pith tools

Reviewed August 6, 2026 · model on record in the stance chip above.