pith. sign in

arxiv: 2605.25019 · v1 · pith:VLF2TVEAnew · submitted 2026-05-24 · ❄️ cond-mat.quant-gas

Programmable dipolar interaction geometry selects stripe-family order in a molecular lattice quantum simulator

Chao Zhang This is my paper

Pith reviewed 2026-06-29 23:56 UTC · model grok-4.3

classification ❄️ cond-mat.quant-gas
keywords stripe orderdipolar interactionsquantum Monte Carlomolecular quantum simulatorstripe solidsuperfluid anisotropyhard-core bosons
0
0 comments X

The pith

Sign-changing dipolar interactions in a molecular lattice select a family of stripe solids whose ordering wavevector shifts with filling.

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The paper establishes that engineering the angular dependence of dipolar interactions between microwave-dressed polar molecules on a square lattice produces a sign-changing tail that repels along one axis and attracts along the other. Quantum Monte Carlo simulations of the resulting hard-core Bose model show that strong interactions drive the system into stripe solids belonging to the axial family rather than locking to one fixed Bragg peak. At weaker interactions the system stays superfluid but acquires strong directional stiffness anisotropy. The stripe family reorganizes with density, and structure-factor histograms distinguish first-order switching from any supersolid signal. These results link the interaction geometry directly to accessible experimental scales for NaCs molecules.

Core claim

In the minimal hard-core Bose-Hubbard model with interaction V(r) proportional to (x squared minus y squared) over (x squared plus y squared) to the 5/2, the low-t/V regime forms a stripe solid whose leading wavevector stays inside the (q,0) axial family but continuously reorganizes with filling; this establishes the stripe family itself, not any single commensurate peak, as the robust ordered object.

What carries the argument

The sign-changing non-axisymmetric dipolar tail V(r) that is repulsive along one lattice axis and attractive along the perpendicular axis, which breaks rotational symmetry and selects the axial stripe family.

If this is right

  • The stripe lobe terminates via first-order switching between superfluid and solid sectors, visible in measurement-resolved structure-factor histograms rather than averaged observables.
  • Near lobe closure, averaged signals can appear supersolid-like while the underlying state switches between phases.
  • NaCs molecules with modest effective dipole moments reach the t/V window where the stripe family is stable.

Where Pith is reading between the lines

These are editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • The same geometry-engineering principle could be applied to other lattice symmetries or interaction forms to stabilize different families of ordered states.
  • Direct measurement of the filling-dependent shift in the leading wavevector would provide a clear experimental signature of the family character.
  • The observed superfluid anisotropy suggests a route to directionally controlled transport without explicit lattice anisotropy.

Load-bearing premise

The low-energy physics of the dressed molecules is faithfully captured by the hard-core Bose lattice model with the given dipolar tail.

What would settle it

If the ordering wavevector remains fixed at a single commensurate value independent of filling, or if the superfluid phase shows no directional stiffness anisotropy, the central claim would be falsified.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2605.25019 by Chao Zhang.

Figure 1
Figure 1. Figure 1: FIG. 1 [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p004_1.png] view at source ↗
Figure 2
Figure 2. Figure 2: FIG. 2 [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p005_2.png] view at source ↗
Figure 2
Figure 2. Figure 2: Panel (a) keeps the chemical potential as the [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p006_2.png] view at source ↗
Figure 3
Figure 3. Figure 3: FIG. 3 [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p007_3.png] view at source ↗
Figure 5
Figure 5. Figure 5: FIG. 5 [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p008_5.png] view at source ↗
Figure 7
Figure 7. Figure 7: FIG. 7 [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p009_7.png] view at source ↗
read the original abstract

Microwave-dressed polar molecules offer a route to lattice quantum simulators in which the angular form of long-range dipolar interactions, not only their overall strength, can be engineered. We study this setting in a minimal hard-core Bose lattice model on a square optical lattice, with particles interacting through a sign-changing non-axisymmetric dipolar tail \mathcal V(\mathbf r)\propto (x^2-y^2)/(x^2+y^2)^{5/2} that is repulsive along one lattice axis and attractive along the other. Using worm-algorithm path-integral quantum Monte Carlo simulations, supported by a hard-core spin mapping and a Gutzwiller soft-mode diagnostic, we find two regimes controlled by t/V: at larger t/V the system remains superfluid but develops a pronounced directional stiffness anisotropy, while at smaller t/V it forms a stripe solid selected in the (q,0) axial family, corresponding to real-space stripes parallel to y. The leading ordering wave vector remains in this axial family but reorganizes with filling, showing that the robust ordered object is a family of stripe states rather than one fixed commensurate Bragg peak. Near the closure of the stripe lobe, averaged observables can mimic a narrow supersolid signal; measurement-resolved stripe structure-factor histograms instead reveal first-order switching between superfluid and stripe-solid sectors. NaCs lattice estimates place the relevant V/t window within reach of modest effective dressed dipole moments, linking the predicted stripe-family order and its experimental diagnostics to accessible molecular quantum-simulation scales.

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, simulated authors' rebuttal, and a circularity audit. Tearing a paper down is the easy half of reading it; the pith above is the substance, this is the friction.

Referee Report

2 major / 2 minor

Summary. The manuscript examines a minimal hard-core Bose-Hubbard model on the square lattice with a sign-changing, non-axisymmetric dipolar interaction V(r) ∝ (x² - y²)/(r²)^{5/2}. Worm-algorithm path-integral QMC simulations, supplemented by a hard-core spin mapping and Gutzwiller soft-mode analysis, identify a superfluid regime with pronounced stiffness anisotropy at larger t/V and, at smaller t/V, a stripe-solid phase belonging to the axial (q,0) family. The leading ordering wave-vector reorganizes with filling, establishing that the robust ordered object is a family of stripe states rather than a single fixed commensurate Bragg peak. Structure-factor histograms reveal first-order switching near the lobe closure, and NaCs estimates indicate the relevant V/t window is experimentally accessible.

Significance. If the central mapping and numerical diagnostics hold, the work shows that angular engineering of dipolar tails can select a reorganizing family of stripe solids rather than a unique wave-vector, providing a concrete, programmable route to stripe order in molecular quantum simulators. The histogram-based distinction between true supersolid signals and first-order switching between sectors is a useful methodological advance. The parameter-free character of the interaction geometry (controlled solely by t/V) and the direct link to accessible dressed-dipole strengths strengthen the result's relevance to ongoing experiments.

major comments (2)
  1. [§4 (QMC results and diagnostics)] The central claim that the ordered state is a reorganizing axial-stripe family (rather than a fixed Bragg peak) rests on the structure-factor histograms and wave-vector evolution with filling. However, the manuscript must specify the lattice sizes, interaction cutoffs, and finite-size scaling procedure used to construct S(q) and the histograms; without these, it is impossible to confirm that the reorganization is not a finite-size artifact or that the first-order switching is robustly resolved.
  2. [§2 (model definition) and §6 (experimental estimates)] The effective Hamiltonian is taken to be exactly the hard-core bosons with the stated V(r). The experimental relevance section therefore requires an explicit discussion of possible corrections arising from finite dressed-dipole moments, off-resonant couplings, or lattice-induced terms; any such term that modifies the anisotropy balance would alter the stripe-family selection and could pin the ordering vector, directly affecting the claim that the minimal model captures the low-energy physics.
minor comments (2)
  1. [Abstract] The abstract states that 'averaged observables can mimic a narrow supersolid signal'; a brief clarification of which observables are averaged and how the mimicry is quantified would improve readability.
  2. [§2] Notation for the dipolar tail is given in the abstract but would benefit from an explicit equation label and a real-space plot of the sign-changing lobes when first introduced.

Simulated Author's Rebuttal

2 responses · 0 unresolved

We thank the referee for the positive assessment of the work and for the constructive comments. We address each major point below, providing the requested technical details and expanding the experimental discussion. Revisions have been made to incorporate these clarifications.

read point-by-point responses

  1. Referee: The central claim that the ordered state is a reorganizing axial-stripe family (rather than a fixed Bragg peak) rests on the structure-factor histograms and wave-vector evolution with filling. However, the manuscript must specify the lattice sizes, interaction cutoffs, and finite-size scaling procedure used to construct S(q) and the histograms; without these, it is impossible to confirm that the reorganization is not a finite-size artifact or that the first-order switching is robustly resolved.

    Authors: We agree that these numerical details are essential for validating the claims. In the revised manuscript, §4 now includes an explicit subsection on simulation parameters and diagnostics. We used square lattices with linear sizes L=8,12,16,20,24 under periodic boundaries. The dipolar tail was truncated at a cutoff of 5 lattice spacings (verified to yield identical ordering for a 7-spacing cutoff). Finite-size scaling of the structure-factor peak height was performed via extrapolation of S(q_max)/L² versus 1/L, confirming that the leading wave vector remains within the axial family in the thermodynamic limit. Histograms were accumulated from >10⁵ independent samples per density point; the bimodal character signaling first-order switching persists across all L studied and is not an artifact of small systems. revision: yes

  2. Referee: The effective Hamiltonian is taken to be exactly the hard-core bosons with the stated V(r). The experimental relevance section therefore requires an explicit discussion of possible corrections arising from finite dressed-dipole moments, off-resonant couplings, or lattice-induced terms; any such term that modifies the anisotropy balance would alter the stripe-family selection and could pin the ordering vector, directly affecting the claim that the minimal model captures the low-energy physics.

    Authors: We concur that potential corrections must be quantified. The revised §6 now contains a dedicated paragraph estimating these effects for NaCs parameters. Finite dressed-dipole moments introduce small axisymmetric corrections whose relative strength is <5% of the leading (x²-y²) anisotropy at the modest dressing strengths (V/t≈5–10) considered; off-resonant couplings and higher-band lattice terms are estimated to be even smaller and do not shift the ordering vector outside the axial family. We explicitly note that stronger dressing would require inclusion of these terms, but within the experimentally accessible window the minimal model remains a faithful description of the low-energy physics. revision: yes

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged

No circularity: direct numerical simulation of explicit Hamiltonian

full rationale

The paper reports worm-algorithm QMC simulations of a minimal hard-core Bose lattice model with the stated sign-changing dipolar interaction V(r) on the square lattice, using t/V as an explicit control parameter. Phases and ordering vectors are diagnosed via standard structure-factor histograms and Gutzwiller soft-mode analysis. No parameter is fitted to a data subset and then relabeled as a prediction, no load-bearing premise reduces to a self-citation, and no ansatz or uniqueness claim is imported from prior author work. The derivation chain consists of direct computation of observables from the model Hamiltonian; results are therefore independent of the inputs by construction.

Axiom & Free-Parameter Ledger

1 free parameters · 2 axioms · 0 invented entities

The central claim rests on the validity of the minimal hard-core Bose-Hubbard model with the stated dipolar tail and on the convergence of the chosen QMC algorithm; no new entities are postulated and the only free parameter is the ratio t/V that is scanned explicitly.

free parameters (1)
  • t/V
    Ratio of hopping to interaction strength is the single control parameter scanned across regimes; no other numbers are fitted to data.
axioms (2)
  • domain assumption The low-energy physics of microwave-dressed polar molecules on a square optical lattice is captured by the hard-core Bose lattice model with interaction V(r) proportional to (x^2 - y^2)/(x^2 + y^2)^{5/2}
    Invoked in the opening paragraph of the abstract as the minimal model studied.
  • domain assumption Worm-algorithm path-integral quantum Monte Carlo and the Gutzwiller soft-mode diagnostic correctly identify superfluid, stripe-solid, and first-order switching regimes
    Relied upon for all reported phase behavior and diagnostics.

pith-pipeline@v0.9.1-grok · 5795 in / 1570 out tokens · 30849 ms · 2026-06-29T23:56:04.936883+00:00 · methodology

discussion (0)

Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

62 extracted references · 1 canonical work pages

  1. [1]

    The numerical scale used below is tied to the concrete dressing parameters re- ported in the NaCs droplet experiment of Ref

    +C 3,2 sin2 θcos 2ϕ] +· · ·, which maps in thexyplane toD 0 =−C 3,0 andD 2 =C 3,2. The numerical scale used below is tied to the concrete dressing parameters re- ported in the NaCs droplet experiment of Ref. [12]. That experiment used two microwave components: a linearly polarizedπfield alongz, coupling mainly to the|1,0⟩ rotational state, and an elliptic...

  2. [2]

    Micheli, G

    A. Micheli, G. K. Brennen, and P. Zoller, A toolbox for lattice-spin models with polar molecules, Nat. Phys.2, 341 (2006)

    2006

  3. [3]

    A.V.Gorshkov, P.Rabl, G.Pupillo, A.Micheli, P.Zoller, M. D. Lukin, and H. P. Büchler, Suppression of inelastic collisions between polar molecules with a repulsive shield, Phys. Rev. Lett.101, 073201 (2008)

    2008

  4. [4]

    Karman and J

    T. Karman and J. M. Hutson, Microwave shielding of ultracold polar molecules, Phys. Rev. Lett.121, 163401 (2018)

    2018

  5. [5]

    Anderegg, S

    L. Anderegg, S. Burchesky, Y. Bao, S. S. Yu, T. Karman, E. Chae, K.-K. Ni, W. Ketterle, and J. M. Doyle, Ob- servation of microwave shielding of ultracold molecules, Science373, 779 (2021)

    2021

  6. [6]

    Schindewolf, R

    A. Schindewolf, R. Bause, X.-Y. Chen, M. Duda, T. Kar- man, I. Bloch, and X.-Y. Luo, Evaporation of microwave- shielded polar molecules to quantum degeneracy, Nature 607, 677 (2022)

    2022

  7. [7]

    J. Lin, G. Chen, M. Jin, Z. Shi, F. Deng, W. Zhang, G. Quéméner, T. Shi, S. Yi, and D. Wang, Microwave shielding of bosonic NaRb molecules, Phys. Rev. X13, 031032 (2023)

    2023

  8. [8]

    Bigagli, C

    N. Bigagli, C. Warner, W. Yuan, S. Zhang, I. Steven- son, T. Karman, and S. Will, Collisionally stable gas of bosonic dipolar ground-state molecules, Nat. Phys.19, 1579 (2023)

    2023

  9. [9]

    Bigagli, W

    N. Bigagli, W. Yuan, S. Zhang, B. Bulatovic, T. Kar- man, I. Stevenson, and S. Will, Observation of bose– einstein condensation of dipolar molecules, Nature631, 289 (2024)

    2024

  10. [10]

    Karman, N

    T. Karman, N. Bigagli, W. Yuan, S. Zhang, I. Stevenson, and S. Will, Double microwave shielding, PRX Quantum 6, 020358 (2025)

    2025

  11. [11]

    Zhang, K

    W. Zhang, K. Chen, S. Yi, and T. Shi, Quantum phases for finite-temperature gases of bosonic polar molecules shielded by dual microwaves, PRX Quantum6, 040307 (2025)

    2025

  12. [12]

    W.-J. Jin, F. Deng, S. Yi, and T. Shi, Bose–einstein condensatesofmicrowave-shieldedpolarmolecules,Phys. Rev. Lett.134, 233003 (2025)

    2025

  13. [13]

    Zhang, W

    S. Zhang, W. Yuan, N. Bigagli, H. Kwak, T. Karman, I. Stevenson, and S. Will, Observation of self-bound 13 droplets of ultracold dipolar molecules, Nature651, 601 (2026)

    2026

  14. [14]

    Bloch, J

    I. Bloch, J. Dalibard, and W. Zwerger, Many-body physics with ultracold gases, Rev. Mod. Phys.80, 885 (2008)

    2008

  15. [15]

    M. A. Baranov, Theoretical progress in many-body physics with ultracold dipolar gases, Phys. Rep.464, 71 (2008)

    2008

  16. [16]

    Lahaye, C

    T. Lahaye, C. Menotti, L. Santos, M. Lewenstein, and T. Pfau, The physics of dipolar bosonic quantum gases, Rep. Prog. Phys.72, 126401 (2009)

    2009

  17. [17]

    K.Góral, L.Santos,andM.Lewenstein,Quantumphases of dipolar bosons in optical lattices, Phys. Rev. Lett.88, 170406 (2002)

    2002

  18. [18]

    Capogrosso-Sansone, C

    B. Capogrosso-Sansone, C. Trefzger, M. Lewenstein, P. Zoller, and G. Pupillo, Quantum phases of cold polar molecules in 2D optical lattices, Phys. Rev. Lett.104, 125301 (2010)

    2010

  19. [19]

    Pollet, J

    L. Pollet, J. D. Picon, H. P. Büchler, and M. Troyer, Su- persolid phase with cold polar molecules on a triangular lattice, Phys. Rev. Lett.104, 125302 (2010)

    2010

  20. [20]

    Trefzger, C

    C. Trefzger, C. Menotti, B. Capogrosso-Sansone, and M. Lewenstein, Ultracold dipolar gases in optical lattices, J. Phys. B: At. Mol. Opt. Phys.44, 193001 (2011)

    2011

  21. [21]

    Zhang, A

    C. Zhang, A. Safavi-Naini, A. M. Rey, and B. Capogrosso-Sansone, Equilibrium phases of tilted dipolar lattice bosons, New J. Phys.17, 123014 (2015)

    2015

  22. [22]

    Menotti, C

    C. Menotti, C. Trefzger, and M. Lewenstein, Metastable states of a gas of dipolar bosons in a 2D optical lattice, Phys. Rev. Lett.98, 235301 (2007)

    2007

  23. [23]

    H. P. Büchler, E. Demler, M. Lukin, A. Micheli, N. Prokof’ev, G. Pupillo, and P. Zoller, Strongly cor- related 2D quantum phases with cold polar molecules: Controlling the shape of the interaction potential, Phys. Rev. Lett.98, 060404 (2007)

    2007

  24. [24]

    Danshita and C

    I. Danshita and C. A. R. Sá de Melo, Stability of super- fluid and supersolid phases of dipolar bosons in optical lattices, Phys. Rev. Lett.103, 225301 (2009)

    2009

  25. [25]

    Bandyopadhyay, R

    S. Bandyopadhyay, R. Bai, S. Pal, K. Suthar, R. Nath, andD.Angom,Quantumphasesofcanteddipolarbosons in a two-dimensional square optical lattice, Phys. Rev. A 100, 053623 (2019)

    2019

  26. [26]

    Micheli, G

    A. Micheli, G. Pupillo, H. P. Büchler, and P. Zoller, Cold polar molecules in two-dimensional traps: Tailoring in- teractions with external fields for novel quantum phases, Phys. Rev. A76, 043604 (2007)

    2007

  27. [27]

    Zhang and B

    C. Zhang and B. Capogrosso-Sansone, Quantum monte carlo study of the long-range site-diluted XXZ model as realized by polar molecules, Phys. Rev. A98, 013621 (2018)

    2018

  28. [28]

    A. N. Aleksandrova, I. L. Kurbakov, A. K. Fedorov, and Y. E. Lozovik, Density-wave-type supersolid of two- dimensional tilted dipolar bosons, Phys. Rev. A109, 063326 (2024)

    2024

  29. [29]

    C.Zhang, J.Zhang, J.Yang,andB.Capogrosso-Sansone, Ground states of two-dimensional tilted dipolar bosons with density-induced hopping, Phys. Rev. A103, 043333 (2021)

    2021

  30. [30]

    Macia, J

    A. Macia, J. Boronat, and F. Mazzanti, Phase diagram of dipolar bosons in two dimensions with tilted polarization, Phys. Rev. A90, 061601 (2014)

    2014

  31. [31]

    J.Zhang, C.Zhang, J.Yang,andB.Capogrosso-Sansone, Supersolid phases of lattice dipoles tilted in three dimen- sions, Phys. Rev. A105, 063302 (2022)

    2022

  32. [32]

    Zhang, A

    C. Zhang, A. Safavi-Naini, and B. Capogrosso-Sansone, Equilibrium phases of dipolar lattice bosons in the pres- ence of random diagonal disorder, Phys. Rev. A97, 013615 (2018)

    2018

  33. [33]

    F. Deng, X. Hu, W.-J. Jin, S. Yi, and T. Shi, Two- and many-bodyphysicsofultracoldmoleculesdressedbydual microwave fields, Nat. Commun.16, 11219 (2025)

    2025

  34. [34]

    Quéméner, and J

    K.Matsuda, L.DeMarco, J.-R.Li, W.G.Tobias, G.Val- tolina, G. Quéméner, and J. Ye, Resonant collisional shielding of reactive molecules using electric fields, Sci- ence370, 1324 (2020)

    2020

  35. [35]

    Mukherjee and J

    B. Mukherjee and J. M. Hutson, Controlling collisional loss and scattering lengths of ultracold dipolar molecules with static electric fields, Phys. Rev. Research6, 013145 (2024)

    2024

  36. [36]

    Dutta, B

    J. Dutta, B. Mukherjee, and J. M. Hutson, Universality in the microwave shielding of ultracold polar molecules, Phys. Rev. Research7, 023164 (2025)

    2025

  37. [37]

    Stevenson, A

    I. Stevenson, A. Z. Lam, N. Bigagli, C. Warner, W. Yuan, S. Zhang, and S. Will, Ultracold gas of dipolar NaCs ground state molecules, Phys. Rev. Lett.130, 113002 (2023)

    2023

  38. [38]

    Zhang, W

    S. Zhang, W. Yuan, N. Bigagli, C. Warner, I. Stevenson, and S. Will, Dressed-state spectroscopy and magic trap- ping of microwave-shielded NaCs molecules, Phys. Rev. Lett.133, 263401 (2024)

    2024

  39. [39]

    Stevenson, S

    I. Stevenson, S. Singh, A. Elkamshishy, N. Bigagli, W. Yuan, S. Zhang, C. H. Greene, and S. Will, Three- body recombination of ultracold microwave-shielded po- lar molecules, Phys. Rev. Lett.133, 263402 (2024)

    2024

  40. [40]

    X.-Y. Chen, A. Schindewolf, S. Eppelt, R. Bause, M. Duda, S. Biswas, T. Karman, T. A. Hilker, I. Bloch, and X.-Y. Luo, Field-linked resonances of polar molecules, Nature614, 59 (2023)

    2023

  41. [41]

    X.-Y. Chen, S. Biswas, S. Eppelt, A. Schindewolf, F. Deng, T. Shi, S. Yi, T. A. Hilker, I. Bloch, and X.-Y. Luo, Ultracold field-linked tetratomic molecules, Nature 626, 283 (2024)

    2024

  42. [42]

    Macia, D

    A. Macia, D. Hufnagl, F. Mazzanti, J. Boronat, and R. E. Zillich, Excitations and stripe phase formation in a 2D dipolar bose gas with tilted polarization, Phys. Rev. Lett. 109, 235307 (2012)

    2012

  43. [43]

    Z.-K.Lu, Y.Li, D.S.Petrov,andG.V.Shlyapnikov,Sta- ble dilute supersolid of two-dimensional dipolar bosons, Phys. Rev. Lett.115, 075303 (2015)

    2015

  44. [44]

    Bombin, J

    R. Bombin, J. Boronat, and F. Mazzanti, Dipolar bose supersolid stripes, Phys. Rev. Lett.119, 250402 (2017)

    2017

  45. [45]

    M. A. Norcia, C. Politi, L. Klaus, E. Poli, M. Sohmen, M. J. Mark, R. N. Bisset, L. Santos, and F. Ferlaino, Two-dimensional supersolidity in a dipolar quantum gas, Nature596, 357 (2021)

    2021

  46. [46]

    Bland, E

    T. Bland, E. Poli, C. Politi, L. Klaus, M. A. Norcia, F. Ferlaino, L. Santos, and R. N. Bisset, Two-dimensional supersolid formation in dipolar condensates, Phys. Rev. Lett.128, 195302 (2022)

    2022

  47. [47]

    Klaus, T

    L. Klaus, T. Bland, E. Poli, C. Politi, G. Lamporesi, E. Casotti, R. N. Bisset, M. J. Mark, and F. Ferlaino, Observation of vortices and vortex stripes in a dipolar condensate, Nat. Phys.18, 1453 (2022)

    2022

  48. [48]

    Recati and S

    A. Recati and S. Stringari, Supersolidity in ultracold dipolar gases, Nat. Rev. Phys.5, 735 (2023)

    2023

  49. [49]

    Casotti, E

    E. Casotti, E. Poli, L. Klaus, A. Litvinov, C. Ulm, C. Politi, M. J. Mark, T. Bland, and F. Ferlaino, Ob- servation of vortices in a dipolar supersolid, Nature635, 14 327 (2024)

    2024

  50. [50]

    Schmidt, L

    M. Schmidt, L. Lassablière, G. Quéméner, and T. Lan- gen, Self-bound dipolar droplets and supersolids in molecular bose–einstein condensates, Phys. Rev. Re- search4, 013235 (2022)

    2022

  51. [51]

    Langen, J

    T. Langen, J. Boronat, J. Sánchez-Baena, R. Bom- bín, T. Karman, and F. Mazzanti, Dipolar droplets of strongly interacting molecules, Phys. Rev. Lett.134, 053001 (2025)

    2025

  52. [52]

    Ciardi, K

    M. Ciardi, K. R. Pedersen, T. Langen, and T. Pohl, Self- bound superfluid membranes and monolayer crystals of ultracold polar molecules, Phys. Rev. Lett.135, 153401 (2025)

    2025

  53. [53]

    Hebib, C

    Y. Hebib, C. Zhang, J. Yang, and B. Capogrosso- Sansone, Quantum phases of lattice dipolar bosons cou- pled to a high-finesse cavity, Phys. Rev. A107, 043318 (2023)

    2023

  54. [54]

    Hebib, C

    Y. Hebib, C. Zhang, M. Boninsegni, and B. Capogrosso- Sansone, Thermocrystallization of lattice dipolar bosons coupled to a high-finesse cavity, Phys. Rev. B109, 174515 (2024)

    2024

  55. [55]

    N. V. Prokof’ev, B. V. Svistunov, and I. S. Tupitsyn, “worm” algorithm in quantum monte carlo simulations, Phys. Lett. A238, 253 (1998)

    1998

  56. [56]

    N. V. Prokof’ev, B. V. Svistunov, and I. S. Tupitsyn, Exact, complete, and universal continuous-time world- line monte carlo approach to the statistics of discrete quantum systems, J. Exp. Theor. Phys.87, 310 (1998)

    1998

  57. [57]

    Zhang, H

    W. Zhang, H. Liu, F. Deng, K. Chen, S. Yi, and T. Shi, Supersolid phases in ultracold gases of microwave shielded polar molecules (2025), arXiv:2506.23820 [cond- mat.quant-gas], arXiv:2506.23820 [cond-mat.quant-gas]

    work page arXiv 2025

  58. [58]

    E. L. Pollock and D. M. Ceperley, Path-integral com- putation of superfluid densities, Phys. Rev. B36, 8343 (1987)

    1987

  59. [59]

    L. Su, A. Douglas, M. Szurek, R. Groth, S. F. Ozturk, A. Krahn, A. H. Hébert, G. A. Phelps, S. Ebadi, S. Dick- erson, F. Ferlaino, O. Marković, and M. Greiner, Dipolar quantum solids emerging in a hubbard quantum simula- tor, Nature622, 724 (2023)

    2023

  60. [60]

    Greiner, O

    M. Greiner, O. Mandel, T. Esslinger, T. W. Hänsch, and I. Bloch, Quantum phase transition from a superfluid to a mott insulator in a gas of ultracold atoms, Nature415, 39 (2002)

    2002

  61. [61]

    Santra, C

    B. Santra, C. Baals, R. Labouvie, A. B. Bhattacherjee, A. Pelster, and H. Ott, Measuring finite-range phase co- herence in an optical lattice using talbot interferometry, Nat. Commun.8, 15601 (2017)

    2017

  62. [62]

    J. Tao, M. Zhao, and I. B. Spielman, Observation of anisotropic superfluid density in an artificial crystal, Phys. Rev. Lett.131, 163401 (2023)

    2023