Integrability, exact reductions and special solutions of the KP-Whitham equations

A. Moro; Gino Biondini; Mark A. Hoefer

REVIEW 3 major objections 5 minor 55 references

Integrability, exact reductions and special solutions of the KP-Whitham equations

T0 review · 3 major / 5 minor · reviewed 2026-08-14 · deepseek-v4-flash

Challenge this review Re-run · record.json Download PDF Read on arXiv ↗ Review JSON

Pith's one-line read The harmonic and soliton limits of the KP-Whitham system are completely integrable four-component hydrodynamic systems.

desk verdict Clean decoupling and harmonic-solution results, with the soliton-limit integrability claim left resting on an omitted calculation. read the letter →

arxiv 1908.06144 v2 pith:VMQUPWYJ submitted 2019-08-16 nlin.SI

Gino Biondini , Mark A. Hoefer , A. Moro This is my paper · ORCID

classification nlin.SI MSC 37K4074J2574J30

keywords Kadomtsev-PetviashviliWhithammodulationtheoryhydrodynamicreductionsHaantjestensordispersionlessKPequationsolitonharmonicwavelimitintegrablesystems

verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal

The pith

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The reading

The paper establishes that the harmonic ($m\to 0$) and soliton ($m\to 1$) limits of the KP-Whitham modulation system—the equations governing slow modulations of periodic solutions of the Kadomtsev-Petviashvili equation—are four-component hydrodynamic systems that are completely integrable. In both limits, a change of variables decouples the mean flow, which obeys the dispersionless KP equation, from a two-component system describing either a linear wave packet or a soliton riding on that flow. The harmonic system is integrated exactly by the method of characteristics once any solution of the dKP equation is known, while the soliton system is shown to admit infinitely many hydrodynamic reductions, the standard signature of integrability for such systems. A series of exact reductions, including a diagonalizable three-component one-dimensional system written in Riemann invariants, follows from these results. The consequence is that the modulation of nonlinear waves in two spatial dimensions becomes accessible to explicit solution or to reduction to known integrable equations.

What carries the argument

The load-bearing mechanism is the method of hydrodynamic reductions. One seeks solutions that depend on $N$ Riemann invariants $R_i$ with characteristic speeds $\lambda_i$ and $\mu_i$; substituting into the dKP mean-flow equations yields the Gibbons-Tsarev system, and substituting into the soliton amplitude and slope equations yields the ODEs $a_i=-2a\bar u_i/(a-q^2+2q\lambda_i-\lambda_i^2)$ and $q_i=-(\lambda_i-q)\bar u_i/(a-q^2+2q\lambda_i-\lambda_i^2)$. The paper's integrability claim for the soliton limit rests on the assertion that the compatibility conditions $a_{ij}=a_{ji}$ and $q_{ij}=q_{ji}$ hold identically modulo the reduction equations, a verification reported from a computer-algebra computation but not reproduced. The diagonalizing transformation $w_1=q-\sqrt{a}$, $w_2=q+\sqrt{a}$ converts the soliton subsystem into diagonal form and yields the Riemann invariants $R_\pm=\bar u+\frac12(q\pm\sqrt{a})^2$ for the one-dimensional reduction.

What would settle it

Run the omitted symbolic check of the compatibility conditions $a_{ij}=a_{ji}$ and $q_{ij}=q_{ji}$ for a generic $N$-component reduction (for example $N=3$ or $N=4$) and confirm that all mixed partials agree modulo the reduction equations; any nonzero remainder disproves the soliton-limit integrability claim. One could also evaluate the Haantjes tensor of the matrix $M=(\lambda I+A)^{-1}(\mu I+B)$ for the soliton-limit system at a randomly chosen nondegenerate point and look for a nonzero component, which would falsify the necessary condition.

Watch

Extended reading notes

Core claim

On its own terms, the paper's central discovery is that the $m\to0$ and $m\to1$ reductions of the five-component KP-Whitham system are four-component $(2+1)$-dimensional hydrodynamic systems that are completely integrable: the harmonic-limit system is solvable by characteristics, and the soliton-limit system passes the Haantjes tensor test and admits infinitely many hydrodynamic reductions. The structural reason is a change of dependent variables, from the modulation parameters $(r_1,r_3,q,p)$ to mean-flow variables $(\bar u,\bar v)$ plus wavenumber and slope, or amplitude and slope, which splits each four-component system into the decoupled dispersionless KP equation for the mean flow and a forced two-component subsystem. The harmonic subsystem is equivalent to wave conservation for linear waves with dispersion relation $\omega=(\bar u+\lambda q^2)k-k^3$; the soliton subsystem has characteristic speeds $\lambda_\pm=(\bar u+a/3-q^2)\cos\theta+2q\sin\theta\pm(2/3)\sqrt{a}|\sin\theta-q\cos\theta|$ and is strictly hyperbolic for $\lambda=1$ (KPII) with $q\neq\tan\theta$. Exact reductions include a one-dimensional Riemann-invariant form for the full soliton-mean-flow system and, for $y$-independent data, equivalence to an isentropic monoatomic gas with pressure $P(\rho)=\frac35\rho^{5/3}$.

Load-bearing premise

The soliton-limit integrability claim rests on an omitted computer-algebra verification that the compatibility conditions $a_{ij}=a_{ji}$ and $q_{ij}=q_{ji}$ hold identically once the reduction equations are used; if that verification were wrong, the hydrodynamic-reductions construction would break down and the claim would not follow.

Editorial extensions

If this is right

The harmonic-limit system can be solved explicitly: for any solution $(\bar u,\bar v)$ of the dispersionless KP equation, the wavenumber and slope are obtained by integrating two ODEs along characteristic curves; an explicit parametric solution is given for the linear shear background $\bar u=\alpha y$, $\bar v=\alpha x$.
The soliton-limit system is integrable in the hydrodynamic-reductions sense, so it possesses infinitely many reductions describing nonlinear interactions of planar simple waves; any $N$-component reduction of dKP supplies $a$ and $q$ through the ODEs above.
In the one-dimensional reduction, the full soliton-mean-flow system is diagonalizable in Riemann invariants with explicit speeds, enabling the study of piecewise-constant initial data that change the soliton's amplitude and slope across an interface.
The homogeneous soliton modulation system is strictly hyperbolic and genuinely nonlinear when $\lambda=1$ and $q\neq\tan\theta$; for $\lambda=-1$ it is elliptic, matching the transverse instability of KPI line solitons.
The $y$-independent soliton reduction is exactly the isentropic gas dynamics of a monoatomic gas with $\gamma=5/3$, so shock and rarefaction intuition carries over to soliton modulation.

Reading between the lines

Editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

If the claimed integrability is genuine, the soliton-limit and harmonic-limit systems should admit Lax pairs or dispersionless Lax formulations; the paper leaves these open, so constructing one would be a direct test of how deep the integrability goes.
Because the full five-component KP-Whitham system reportedly fails the Haantjes test, the integrable limits may be an exceptional boundary: typical elliptic cnoidal wavetrains in $2+1$ dimensions could be genuinely non-integrable, and only the harmonic and soliton extremes are tractable.
The diagonal variables $w_1=q-\sqrt{a}$ and $w_2=q+\sqrt{a}$ behave like independent modes with distinct velocities, suggesting the soliton subsystem can be read as two nonlinearly interacting simple waves whose modes could be separated numerically in a nontrivial dKP background.
The equivalence to $\gamma=5/3$ gas dynamics for the $y$-independent reduction raises the possibility that multidimensional soliton modulation inherits multidimensional gas-dynamics phenomena such as Mach reflection, which could be tested by direct KP simulation.

Share X Bluesky LinkedIn Reddit HN

Signed reviews

No signed human review yet.

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, and a circularity audit.

Desk Editor's Note

read the letter

Two things to know. The paper does what its title says: it takes the harmonic and soliton limits of the KP-Whitham system, finds a change of variables that splits each four-component system into a dKP mean flow plus a two-component wave/soliton subsystem, and solves the harmonic subsystem completely by characteristics once the mean flow is known. That is concrete, useful work. The second thing is that the paper's central claim for the soliton limit—complete integrability in the sense of hydrodynamic reductions—is asserted but not demonstrated: the key compatibility check (3.13) is left to an omitted Mathematica computation.

The explicit derivations are solid. The decoupling is shown step by step, the characteristic integration in Section 4 is self-contained and includes a worked example, and the Riemann invariant reductions in Section 5 are a genuine contribution to the toolkit for soliton-mean-flow interactions. The authors are also honest about what they haven't established: they note that the Haantjes test is only necessary, that the full KP-Whitham system remains open, and they flag the missing calculation rather than hiding it.

The reader and the stress-test note are right, though: the omitted verification is load-bearing. The hydrodynamic reduction construction for (2.11) goes through only if (3.13) holds identically, and the paper gives no way to check that short of redoing the algebra. The same applies to the Haantjes test in Section 3.1. This is a proof gap, not an error, and it is fixable: a short supplement or a notebook would close it. The degenerate case where the denominator in (3.12) vanishes is also not discussed; that is a minor omission but worth a sentence.

The paper deserves a serious referee. The harmonic results and the reductions stand on their own, and the soliton integrability claim is plausible and probably correct. If I were the editor I would send it to review with the explicit request that the authors supply the missing computations or downgrade the integrability claim to conditional. This is for researchers in Whitham theory and dispersive shock waves, and for anyone who wants explicit (2+1)-dimensional modulation systems to work with.

Referee Report

3 major / 5 minor

Summary. This paper studies the harmonic (m→0) and soliton (m→1) limits of the five-component KP-Whitham modulation system. Through a change of dependent variables, each four-component limit is split into a decoupled dispersionless KP (dKP) system for the mean flow and a two-component system describing linear waves or solitons on that flow. For the harmonic limit the auxiliary system is integrated along characteristics, with an explicit parametric solution for a linear background. For the soliton limit the paper claims complete integrability in the sense of hydrodynamic reductions, derives the associated ODE system for N-component reductions, analyzes hyperbolicity, diagonalizes the homogeneous system, constructs Riemann invariants for one-dimensional reductions, and identifies a gas-dynamics reduction.

Significance. If the integrability claim is established, the paper gives a useful and physically motivated decomposition of two distinguished limits of a multidimensional Whitham system. The decoupling between mean flow and wave/soliton degrees of freedom is explicit and novel in the (2+1)-dimensional setting; the characteristic integration of the harmonic limit is verifiable and correct; and the soliton-limit reductions (constant mean flow, one-dimensional fields, Riemann invariants, gas-dynamics analogy) are valuable for future modulation-theory applications. The methodological point that the Haantjes and hydrodynamic-reduction tests can be applied by using x or y as the evolution variable is also interesting. The main weakness is that every computational verification in the integrability section is omitted, so the central claim is not independently checkable from the text.

major comments (3)

[Section 3.2, Eqs. (3.10)-(3.13)] The central claim that system (2.11) is integrable in the sense of hydrodynamic reductions rests entirely on the sentence "We verify by direct calculation that the compatibility conditions (3.13) are identically satisfied modulo all equations above." No computation is shown or provided as ancillary material, and no explicit family of reductions is exhibited; the Haantjes test in Section 3.1 is explicitly only a necessary condition. As written, the central assertion is unverified. Please include the full verification (or a reproducible notebook) and state explicitly which equations are used in the reduction.
[Section 3.2, derivation of Eq. (3.12)] Solving the linear system for (a_i, q_i) obtained by substituting the reduction ansatz into (2.11c,d) involves a 2x2 coefficient matrix with determinant (a - s^2)(a - 9s^2), where s = lambda_i - q. The displayed formulas (3.12) cancel the factor (a - 9s^2), so they are derived only when both factors are nonzero. The text does not state this or address the degenerate locus a = 9(lambda_i - q)^2. The compatibility verification, even if supplied, would need to cover or explicitly exclude this locus; please clarify the domain on which the reduction construction is valid.
[Abstract and Section 6] The abstract and conclusions advertise integrability of "both four-component systems" without qualification, but the hydrodynamic-reduction proof in Section 3.2 is carried out only for lambda = 1, and Section 5.1 shows that the homogeneous soliton system is elliptic for lambda < 0. Please restrict the integrability claim to lambda = 1 (KPII) in the abstract and conclusions, or provide a separate treatment of the lambda = -1 case.

minor comments (5)

[Section 3.1, Eq. (3.4)] The displayed Nijenhuis tensor formula has a typo: the second term should be M^p_k times the derivative of M^i_j, not M^p_i times that derivative. Please correct the formula.
[Section 3.1, paragraph after Eq. (3.5)] The text says the full KP-Whitham system was stated in [2] to fail the Haantjes test and then says the test cannot be directly applied to that system. This is confusing; please clarify whether [2] used a different formulation or whether the earlier statement is being reinterpreted.
[Section 4, sentences preceding Eq. (4.3)] The sentence refers to "the functions a(x(t),y(t),t) and q(...)" but the harmonic-limit variable is k, not a. Please replace a with k to avoid confusion with the soliton amplitude.
[Section 5.4, Eq. (5.24)] The claimed equivalence to isentropic gas dynamics appears to have an inconsistent constant: with rho = (4/27)a^{3/2}, the momentum equation becomes U_t + UU_y + 2^{2/3} rho^{-1/3} rho_y = 0, which is not (1/rho)P_y with P = (3/5)rho^{5/3}. Either the density scaling or the pressure law needs a factor correction.
[Section 5.4, sentence after Eq. (5.13)] The sentence "Since the original system (2.11) is completely integrable, the reduced system (5.13) is too" relies on the unproved integrability claim; the direct diagonalization that follows is sufficient evidence, so please rephrase to avoid circularity.

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged · score 0.0 of 10

No circularity found; the paper's reductions and integrability claims are self-contained derivations from the externally derived KP-Whitham system, with the main caveat being an omitted algebraic verification rather than a circular step.

full rationale

The paper starts from the five-component KP-Whitham modulation system (2.4), taken from [2], which was derived independently by multiple-scales expansion and validated by numerical simulation in that prior work. The present paper introduces no fitted parameters and makes no empirical predictions; its claims are algebraic and structural. The decoupling of the mean flow in the harmonic and soliton limits is obtained by explicit invertible changes of variables from (r1, r3, q, p) to (u, v, k, q) and to (u, v, a, q), yielding systems (2.9) and (2.11). In the harmonic case, (2.9a)-(2.9b) are identified as the dispersionless KP system, and (2.9c)-(2.9d) are shown to be equivalent to wave conservation with the KP linear dispersion relation; this is a genuine reduction, not a definitional renaming. The integrability analysis in Section 3 applies the Haantjes tensor test and the method of hydrodynamic reductions. For the soliton system (2.11), the hydrodynamic-reduction integrability claim rests on the assertion that compatibility conditions (3.13) are 'identically satisfied modulo all equations above' and that the calculation was performed in Mathematica but omitted. That is an unexhibited computation, hence a proof gap, but it is not circular: the target integrability conclusion is not assumed as an input; it is claimed to follow from a verification that the reader cannot inspect. The same holds for the omitted Haantjes-tensor computation, which the paper itself describes as tedious but straightforward. Section 4's exact integration of the harmonic limit is a constructive solution along characteristics for any given dKP background and does not presuppose the result. Section 5's reductions, diagonalizations, and Riemann-invariant forms are further explicit algebraic manipulations with no fitted inputs. Self-citations to [2], [1], and [3] concern the externally derived modulation system and related prior derivation, not the new integrability claims; the external uniqueness and stability results cited ([26], [18]) are not used to force the paper's conclusions. Therefore no load-bearing step reduces by construction to its own inputs, and the appropriate circularity score is 0. The substantive caveat is the omitted verification of (3.13), which belongs to correctness risk rather than circularity.

Assumptions & free parameters 0 free parameters · 4 assumptions · 0 invented entities

The paper introduces no free parameters or invented entities. Its central results rest on the accepted KP-Whitham system from [2] and on standard integrability criteria. The only unverified burden is the omitted Mathematica computation attesting to the Haantjes tensor and compatibility conditions.

assumptions (4)

domain assumption The KP-Whitham system (2.4), with coefficients (2.6), is the correct modulation system for the KP equation.
Taken from prior work [2] (Ablowitz, Biondini, Wang). This paper starts from (2.4) as a given; the derivation is not reproduced.
standard math The Haantjes tensor test (vanishing of the Haantjes tensor of the matrix M in (3.5)) is a necessary condition for integrability of (2+1)-dimensional hydrodynamic systems.
Used in Section 3.1; referenced to [24].
standard math A (2+1)-dimensional quasilinear system is integrable if it admits infinitely many hydrodynamic reductions to compatible 1D systems in Riemann invariants.
Used in Section 3.2; referenced to [23].
standard math The dKP equation is integrable and its hydrodynamic reductions are governed by the Gibbons-Tsarev system (3.11).
Assumed from literature [27,38,39] in Section 3.2.

how reviews work

0 comments

Cite this review

Pith. "Pith review of Integrability, exact reductions and special solutions of the KP-Whitham equations." pith.science (2026). https://pith.science/paper/VMQUPWYJ

@misc{pith2026190806144,
  author       = {Pith},
  title        = {Pith review of: Integrability, exact reductions and special solutions of the KP-Whitham equations},
  year         = {2026},
  howpublished = {\url{https://pith.science/paper/VMQUPWYJ}},
  note         = {Machine review of arXiv:1908.06144}
}

read the original abstract

Reductions of the KP-Whitham system, namely the (2+1)-dimensional hydrodynamic system of five equations that describes the slow modulations of periodic solutions of the Kadomtsev-Petviashvili (KP) equation, are studied. Specifically, the soliton and harmonic wave limits of the KP-Whitham system are considered, which give rise in each case to a four-component (2+1)-dimensional hydrodynamic system. It is shown that a suitable change of dependent variables splits the resulting four-component systems into two parts: (i) a decoupled, independent two-component system comprised of the dispersionless KP equation, (ii) an auxiliary, two-component system coupled to the mean flow equations, which describes either the evolution of a linear wave or a soliton propagating on top of the mean flow. The integrability of both four-component systems is then demonstrated by applying the Haantjes tensor test as well as the method of hydrodynamic reductions. Various exact reductions of these systems are then presented that correspond to concrete physical scenarios.

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

55 extracted references · 55 canonical work pages

[1]

Whitham modu lation theory for (2 +1)-dimensional equations of Kadomtsev-Petviashvili type

M. J. Ablowitz, G. Biondini and I. Rumanov, “Whitham modu lation theory for (2 +1)-dimensional equations of Kadomtsev-Petviashvili type”, J. Phys. A 51, 215501 (2018)

work page 2018
[2]

Whitham modulat ion theory for the Kadomtsev- Petviashvili equation

M. J. Ablowitz, G. Biondini and Q. Wang, “Whitham modulat ion theory for the Kadomtsev- Petviashvili equation”, Proc. Roy. Soc. A 473, 20160695 (2017)

work page 2017
[3]

Whitham modulat ion theory for the two-dimensional Benjamin-Ono equation

M. J. Ablowitz, G. Biondini and Q. Wang, “Whitham modulat ion theory for the two-dimensional Benjamin-Ono equation”, Phys. Rev. E 96, 032225 (2017)

work page 2017
[4]

M. J. Ablowitz and P . A. Clarkson, Solitons, Nonlinear Evolution Equations and Inverse Scatt ering (Cambridge University Press, 1991)

work page 1991
[5]

M. J. Ablowitz and H. Segur, Solitons and the inverse scattering transform (SIAM, Philadelphia, 1981)

work page 1981
[6]

E. D. Belokolos, A. I. Bobenko, V . Z. Enolskii, A. R. Its an d V . B. Matveev, Algebro-geometric approach to nonlinear integrable equations (Springer, Berlin 1994)

work page 1994
[7]

Line soliton interactions of the Kadomtse v-Petviashvili equation

G. Biondini, “Line soliton interactions of the Kadomtse v-Petviashvili equation”, Phys. Rev. Lett. 99 064103 (2007)

work page 2007
[8]

Soliton solutions of th e Kadomtsev-Petviashvili II equation

G. Biondini and S. Chakravarty, “Soliton solutions of th e Kadomtsev-Petviashvili II equation”, J. Math. Phys. 47, 033514 (2006)

work page 2006

Show all 55 references

[9]

On a family of solutions of the Kadomtsev-Petviashvili equation which also satisfy the Toda lattice hierarchy

G. Biondini and Y . Kodama, “On a family of solutions of the Kadomtsev-Petviashvili equation which also satisfy the Toda lattice hierarchy”, J. Phys. A 36, 10519–10536 (2003)

2003
[10]

Soli ton interactions of the Kadomtsev- Petviashvili equation and the generation of large-amplitu de water waves

G. Biondini, K.-i. Maruno, M. Oikawa and H. Tsuji, “Soli ton interactions of the Kadomtsev- Petviashvili equation and the generation of large-amplitu de water waves”, Stud. Appl. Math. 122, 377–394 (2009); Stud. Appl. Math. 123, 375 (2009)

2009
[11]

V . N. Bogaevskii, On Korteweg-de Vries, Kadomtsev-Petviashvili, and Boussi nesq equations in the theory of modulations (in Russian), Zh. Vychisl. Mat. i Mat. Fiz. 30, 1487–1501 (1990), English translation in U.S.S.R. Comput. Math. and Math. Phys. 30, 148–159 (1991)

1990
[12]

Towards an inverse scattering theory for non-decaying potentials of the heat equation

M. Boiti, F. Pempinelli, A. K. Pogrebkov, and B. Prinari , “Towards an inverse scattering theory for non-decaying potentials of the heat equation”, Inv. Probl. 17, 937–957 (2001)

2001
[13]

Extended resolvent and inverse scattering with an application to KPI

M. Boiti, F. Pempinelli, A. K. Pogrebkov, and B. Prinari , “Extended resolvent and inverse scattering with an application to KPI”, J. Math. Phys. 44, 3309–3340 (2003) Integrability, exact reductions and special solutions of t he KP-Whitham equations 16

2003
[14]

Building an extended resolvent of the heat operator via twisting transformations

M. Boiti, F. Pempinelli, A. K. Pogrebkov, and B. Prinari , “Building an extended resolvent of the heat operator via twisting transformations”, Theor . Math. Phys. 159, 721–733 (2009)

2009
[15]

On the equivalence of di ﬀerent approaches for generating multisoliton solutions of the KPII equation s

M. Boiti, F. Pempinelli, A. K. Pogrebkov, and B. Prinari , “On the equivalence of di ﬀerent approaches for generating multisoliton solutions of the KPII equation s”, Theor . Math. Phys. 165, 1237–1255 (2010)

2010
[16]

Mach reﬂection for the two dime nsional Burgers equation

M. Brio and J. K. Hunter, “Mach reﬂection for the two dime nsional Burgers equation” Physica D 60, 194–207 (1992)

1992
[17]

Interaction of line ar modulated waves with unsteady dispersive hydrodynamic states

T. Congy, G. A. El, and M. A. Hoefer, “Interaction of line ar modulated waves with unsteady dispersive hydrodynamic states”, arXiv:1812.06593 [nlin.PS] (2010)

2010 arXiv
[18]

Stability for systems of conservation l aws in several space dimensions

C. M. Dafermos “Stability for systems of conservation l aws in several space dimensions”, SIAM J. Math. Anal. 26 1403–1414 (1995)

1995
[19]

L. A. Dickey, Soliton equations and Hamiltonian systems (World Scientiﬁc, Singapore, 2000)

2000
[20]

Analytic solution of the two-dimensiona l Korteweg-de Vries equation,

V . S. Dryuma, “Analytic solution of the two-dimensiona l Korteweg-de Vries equation,” Sov. Phys. JETP Lett. 19, 381–388 (1974)

1974
[21]

Dispersive shock waves and mod ulation theory

G. A. El and M. A. Hoefer, “Dispersive shock waves and mod ulation theory”, Phys. D 333, 11–65 (2016)

2016
[22]

The characte rization of two-component (2 +1)- dimensional integrable systems of hydrodynamic type

E. V . Ferapontov and K. R. Khusnutdinova, “The characte rization of two-component (2 +1)- dimensional integrable systems of hydrodynamic type”, J. Phys. A 37, 2949 (2004)

2004
[23]

On the integr ability of (2 +1)-dimensional quasilinear systems

E. V . Ferapontov and K. R. Khusnutdinova, “On the integr ability of (2 +1)-dimensional quasilinear systems”, Comm. Math. Phys. 248, 187–206 (2004)

2004
[24]

The Haantjes tensor and double waves for multi- dimensional systems of hydrodynamic type: a necessary cond ition for integrability

E. V . Ferapontov and K. R. Khusnutdinova, “The Haantjes tensor and double waves for multi- dimensional systems of hydrodynamic type: a necessary cond ition for integrability”, Proc. R. Soc. Lond. A 462, 1197–1219 (2006)

2006
[25]

Dispersive deformations of hydrodynamic reductions of (2 +1)-D dispersionless integrable systems

E. V . Ferapontov and A. Moro, “Dispersive deformations of hydrodynamic reductions of (2 +1)-D dispersionless integrable systems”, J. Phys. A 42, 035211 (2009)

2009
[26]

Uniqueness for multidimensi onal hyperbolic systems with commuting Jacobians

H. Frid and P . G. LeFloch, “Uniqueness for multidimensi onal hyperbolic systems with commuting Jacobians”, Arch. Rat. Mech. Anal. 182, 25–47 (2006)

2006
[27]

Reductions of the Benney eq uations

J. Gibbons and S. P . Tsarev, “Reductions of the Benney eq uations”, Phys. Lett. A 211, 19–24 (1996)

1996
[28]

Numerical study of the Kadomtsev-Petviashvili equation and dispersive shock waves

T. Grava, C. Klein and G. Pitton, “Numerical study of the Kadomtsev-Petviashvili equation and dispersive shock waves”, Proc. R. Soc. A 474, 20170458 (2018)

2018
[29]

On Xm-forming sets of eigenvectors

J. Haantjes, “On Xm-forming sets of eigenvectors”, Indagat. Math. 17, 158–162 (1955)

1955
[30]

Wronskian structure s of solitons for soliton equations

R. Hirota, Y . Ohta and J. Satsuma, “Wronskian structure s of solitons for soliton equations” Prog. Theor . Phys. Suppl. 94, 59–72 (1988)

1988
[31]

Infeld and G

E. Infeld and G. Rowlands, Nonlinear waves, solitons and chaos (Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, 2000)

2000
[32]

On the stabilit y of solitary waves in weakly dispersive media

B. B. Kadomtsev and V . I. Petviashvili, “On the stabilit y of solitary waves in weakly dispersive media”, Sov. Phys. Dokl. 15, 539–541 (1970)

1970
[33]

On exact solutions of nonlinear acoustic equations

A. M. Kamchatnov, M. V . Pavlov, “On exact solutions of nonlinear acoustic equations”, Wave Motion, 67, 81-88 (2016)

2016
[34]

Numerical study of the KP equat ion for non-periodic waves

C.-Y . Kao and Y . Kodama, “Numerical study of the KP equat ion for non-periodic waves”, Math. Comput. Simul. 82, 1185–1218 (2012)

2012
[35]

Self-similar solutions of two-dimensio nal conservation laws

B. L. Keyﬁtz, “Self-similar solutions of two-dimensio nal conservation laws”, J. Hyp. Di ﬀ. Eq. 1, 445–492 (2004)

2004
[36]

Numerical study of oscillatory regimes in the Kadomtsev- Petviashvili equation

C. Klein, C. Sparber and P . Markowich, “Numerical study of oscillatory regimes in the Kadomtsev- Petviashvili equation”, J. Nonl. Sci. 17, 429–470 (2007)

2007
[37]

Y oung diagrams and N-soliton solutions of the KP equation,

Y . Kodama, “Y oung diagrams and N-soliton solutions of the KP equation,” J. Phys. A 37, 11169– 11190 (2004)

2004
[38]

A method for solving the dispersionless KP e quation and its exact solutions

Y . Kodama, “A method for solving the dispersionless KP e quation and its exact solutions”, Phys. Lett. A 129, 223–226 (1988)

1988
[39]

A method for solving the dispe rsionless KP equation and its exact solutions. II

Y . Kodama and J. Gibbons, “A method for solving the dispe rsionless KP equation and its exact solutions. II”, Phys. Lett. A 135, 167–170 (1989)

1989
[40]

KP solitons, total positi vity, and cluster algebras

Y . Kodama and L. K. Williams, “KP solitons, total positi vity, and cluster algebras”, Proc. Nat. Acad. Sci. 108, 8984–8989 (2011)

2011
[41]

B. G. Konopelchenko, Solitons in multidimensions: inverse spectral transform m ethod (World Integrability, exact reductions and special solutions of t he KP-Whitham equations 17 Scientiﬁc, 1993)

1993
[42]

Quasiconformal mappings and solutions of the dispersionless KP hierarchy

B. Konopelchenko, L. Mart´ ınez-Alonso, and E. Medina, “Quasiconformal mappings and solutions of the dispersionless KP hierarchy”, Theoretical and Mathema tical Physics, 133(2), 1529-1538 (2002)

2002
[43]

Method of averaging for two-dimensio nal “integrable

I. M. Krichever, “Method of averaging for two-dimensio nal “integrable” equations”, Funktsional. Anal. i Prilozhen. 22, 37–52 (1988)

1988
[44]

Solitonic dispersive hydrodynamics: Theory and observation

M. D. Maiden, D. V . Anderson, N. A. Franco, G. A. El and M. A . Hoefer, “Solitonic dispersive hydrodynamics: Theory and observation”, Phys. Rev. Lett. 120, 144101 (2018)

2018
[45]

The Cauchy problem on th e plane for the dispersionless Kadomtsev-Petviashvili equation

S. V . Manakov and P . M. Santini, “The Cauchy problem on th e plane for the dispersionless Kadomtsev-Petviashvili equation”, JETP Lett. 83, 462–466 (2006)

2006
[46]

On the solutions of the d KP equation: the nonlinear Riemann Hilbert problem, longtime behaviour, implicit solutions a nd wave breaking

S. V . Manakov and P . M. Santini, “On the solutions of the d KP equation: the nonlinear Riemann Hilbert problem, longtime behaviour, implicit solutions a nd wave breaking”, J. Phys. A 41, 055204 (2008)

2008
[47]

Solvable vector nonlin ear Riemann problems, exact implicit solutions of dispersionless PDEs and wave breaking

S. V . Manakov and P . M. Santini, “Solvable vector nonlin ear Riemann problems, exact implicit solutions of dispersionless PDEs and wave breaking”, J. Phys. A 44, 345203 (2011)

2011
[48]

An N soliton resonance solution for the KP equation: interactio n with change of form and velocity

E. Medina, “An N soliton resonance solution for the KP equation: interactio n with change of form and velocity” Lett. Math. Phys. 62, 91–99 (2002)

2002
[49]

J. C. Neu, Singular perturbation in the physical sciences (American Mathematical Society, Providence, RI, 2015)

2015
[50]

Novikov, S

S. Novikov, S. V . Manakov, L. P . Pitaevskii and V . E. Zakh arov, Theory of solitons: the inverse scattering method (Plenum, New Y ork, 1984)

1984
[51]

F. W. Olver, D. W. Lozier, R. F. Boisvert and C. W. Clark, NIST handbook of mathematical functions (Cambridge University Press, New Y ork, 2010)

2010
[52]

Classiﬁcation of integrable hydrodynam ic chains and generating functions of conservation laws

M. V . Pavlov, “Classiﬁcation of integrable hydrodynam ic chains and generating functions of conservation laws”, J. Phys. A 39, 10803 (2006)

2006
[53]

Integrability of the Gibbons-Tsarev sys tem

M. V . Pavlov, “Integrability of the Gibbons-Tsarev sys tem”, in Geometry, topology, and mathematical physics: S. P . Novikov’s seminar , 2006–2007, V . M. Buchstaber and I. M. Krichever, Eds. (American Mathematical Society, 2008)

2006
[54]

Non-linear dispersive waves

G. B. Whitham, “Non-linear dispersive waves”, Proc. Roy. Soc. Ser . A 283, 238–261 (1965)

1965
[55]

G. B. Whitham, Linear and nonlinear waves (Wiley, 1974)

1974

Pith tools

Reviewed August 14, 2026 · model on record in the stance chip above.

[1] [1]

Whitham modu lation theory for (2 +1)-dimensional equations of Kadomtsev-Petviashvili type

M. J. Ablowitz, G. Biondini and I. Rumanov, “Whitham modu lation theory for (2 +1)-dimensional equations of Kadomtsev-Petviashvili type”, J. Phys. A 51, 215501 (2018)

work page 2018

[2] [2]

Whitham modulat ion theory for the Kadomtsev- Petviashvili equation

M. J. Ablowitz, G. Biondini and Q. Wang, “Whitham modulat ion theory for the Kadomtsev- Petviashvili equation”, Proc. Roy. Soc. A 473, 20160695 (2017)

work page 2017

[3] [3]

Whitham modulat ion theory for the two-dimensional Benjamin-Ono equation

M. J. Ablowitz, G. Biondini and Q. Wang, “Whitham modulat ion theory for the two-dimensional Benjamin-Ono equation”, Phys. Rev. E 96, 032225 (2017)

work page 2017

[4] [4]

M. J. Ablowitz and P . A. Clarkson, Solitons, Nonlinear Evolution Equations and Inverse Scatt ering (Cambridge University Press, 1991)

work page 1991

[5] [5]

M. J. Ablowitz and H. Segur, Solitons and the inverse scattering transform (SIAM, Philadelphia, 1981)

work page 1981

[6] [6]

E. D. Belokolos, A. I. Bobenko, V . Z. Enolskii, A. R. Its an d V . B. Matveev, Algebro-geometric approach to nonlinear integrable equations (Springer, Berlin 1994)

work page 1994

[7] [7]

Line soliton interactions of the Kadomtse v-Petviashvili equation

G. Biondini, “Line soliton interactions of the Kadomtse v-Petviashvili equation”, Phys. Rev. Lett. 99 064103 (2007)

work page 2007

[8] [8]

Soliton solutions of th e Kadomtsev-Petviashvili II equation

G. Biondini and S. Chakravarty, “Soliton solutions of th e Kadomtsev-Petviashvili II equation”, J. Math. Phys. 47, 033514 (2006)

work page 2006