Pith. sign in

REVIEW 3 major objections 5 minor 86 references

Brillouin lasers in Bragg grating microresonators

T0 review · 3 major / 5 minor · reviewed 2026-08-07 · deepseek-v4-flash

Challenge this review Re-run · record.json Download PDF Read on arXiv ↗

Pith's one-line read An all-optically inscribed intracavity Bragg grating opens a photonic bandgap at the first-order Stokes frequency, raising the Brillouin laser threshold at least six-fold and suppressing a tenth-order cascade at 399 mW on-chip pump power.

desk verdict A credible demonstration of bandgap-based Brillouin cascade suppression in a microresonator, with one uncontrolled threshold comparison and an unverified mechanism that need referee attention. read the letter →

arxiv 2506.03575 v1 pith:VO4A33JB submitted 2025-06-04 physics.optics

Ryan L. Russell , Moritz Merklein , Choon Kong Lai , Cong Tinh Bui , Alvaro Casas-Bedoya , Duk-Yong Choi , Stephen J. Madden , Benjamin J. Eggleton This is my paper
classification physics.optics
keywords BrillouinlaserstimulatedscatteringphotonicbandgapBragggratingmicroresonatorchalcogenidecascadeinhibitionmodesplittingall-opticalinscription
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal

The pith

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The reading

Brillouin lasers on a chip are attractive as ultra-coherent light sources, but in microresonators the Brillouin frequency shift usually matches the cavity mode spacing, so the first Stokes wave pumps a second Stokes wave and a long cascade develops. Cascading divides the pump power among many tones and injects thermal noise into the lasing mode, capping both power and coherence. This paper shows that an intracavity Bragg grating, written into a chalcogenide ring after fabrication, opens a narrow photonic bandgap at the frequency of the first Stokes mode; the vanishing density of optical states inside the gap blocks the phase-matched pump-to-Stokes scattering that seeds the cascade. The measured result is at least a six-fold rise in the pump threshold for Brillouin lasing, and at 399 mW of on-chip pump power — enough in the same device to drive a tenth-order cascade — no first-order Stokes signal appears at all. If the density-of-states mechanism is the whole story, the same tool should be able to suppress any selected scattering pathway in other microresonator oscillators, not just Brillouin lasers.

What carries the argument

The load-bearing object is the intracavity Bragg grating: a periodic refractive-index modulation written all-optically in the As$_2$S$_3$ microresonator by a standing wave generated from counter-propagating pump light, which creates the photonic bandgap, meaning a spectral band of vanishing optical density of states. The grating couples the clockwise and counter-clockwise travelling modes with coupling rate $\kappa_B$, lifting their degeneracy and splitting the resonance into a symmetric and an antisymmetric standing-wave eigenmode separated by $\kappa_B$; the split-mode transmission is modelled by the coupled-mode equations and transfer function that the paper fits to data, with $\kappa_B/2\pi$ up to 1.85 GHz. Inside the bandgap the optical density of states vanishes, so the Golden-Rule scattering rate from pump to a Stokes mode placed in the gap goes to zero. Because the grating is written after fabrication and can be erased and rewritten, the spectral position of the gap is reconfigurable, which is what makes mode-selective suppression a practical control knob.

What would settle it

Measure the Brillouin gain linewidth or acoustic mode lifetime of the resonator before and after grating inscription with the Stokes mode kept outside the bandgap; if the gain per unit pump power is unchanged, the inhibition is purely a density-of-states effect, whereas a measurable drop would implicate the acoustic mode. A complementary test is to record Stokes output power as the pump is continuously detuned across the split-mode doublet: the suppression should be confined to the bandgap and recover at the two split-mode peaks.

Watch

Extended reading notes

Core claim

On the paper's own terms, the claim is that aligning the first-order Stokes mode with the photonic bandgap of an intracavity Bragg grating inhibits stimulated Brillouin scattering into that mode, and therefore arrests the entire cascade, because the transition rate into a final optical state is proportional to the density of states at that frequency. The supporting evidence is a controlled comparison in the same resonator: with the pump on a normal Lorentzian resonance, the Brillouin laser turns on at 5.6 mW of on-chip power with 33% pump-to-Stokes conversion; with the Stokes frequency aligned to the bandgap, no Stokes emission is seen up to 35 mW, a threshold increase of at least six-fold. At high power, a device with a super-structured grating splitting four adjacent modes shows no measurable first-order Stokes at 399 mW on-chip, the same conditions that produced a tenth-order cascade before grating inscription. The paper attributes the weak re-emergence of Stokes signal above 35 mW not to a failure of the bandgap but to thermorefractive shifting of the resonances, which moves the Stokes wave out of the gap; active pump stabilisation is identified as the route to quantitative inhibition in the high-power regime.

Load-bearing premise

The paper attributes the inhibition entirely to the absence of an optical final state at the Stokes frequency, assuming the grating leaves the acoustic mode and the Brillouin gain coefficient unchanged; if the grating inscription also altered the acoustic confinement or the gain, the observed threshold increase would overstate the role of the bandgap alone.

Editorial extensions

If this is right

  • A single-mode Brillouin laser can run at higher output power and lower fundamental linewidth because pump power is no longer siphoned into higher Stokes orders and the thermal-phonon noise channels attached to those orders are removed.
  • The same device can be toggled between cascaded and single-mode operation by writing, erasing, or tuning the grating after fabrication, giving a reconfigurable rather than a fixed design.
  • With the pump laser actively locked to the cavity, the thermorefractive re-emergence limit disappears, so the six-fold threshold increase becomes a floor rather than a ceiling and the regime where the second-order Stokes mode is bandgap-blocked becomes accessible.
  • The super-structured grating result shows that several adjacent cavity modes can be split simultaneously in one exposure, enabling direct engineering of the microresonator's mode spectrum for mode-selective operation.
  • The same photonic-bandgap mechanism should transfer to other cavity-based nonlinear oscillators, where suppressing a selected parametric or Kerr pathway is equivalent to removing the final optical state.

Reading between the lines

Editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • Because the threshold increase is a local probe of the density of states, scanning the pump detuning across the split mode could map the bandgap edge shape inside a microresonator, an in-situ measurement the paper does not report.
  • The paper blocks the first Stokes order, but a natural next experiment is to place the bandgap at the second-order Stokes frequency instead; whether the cascade is arrested there would discriminate between a purely seed-based cascade and one that can bypass a missing intermediate.
  • The reconfigurability points toward a single chip that can be configured on demand as either a Brillouin-Kerr frequency comb source or a single-mode low-noise laser, with no change of hardware beyond the writing beam.
  • A quantitative comparison of the threshold increase to the bandgap width, using the ratio $\kappa_B/\kappa_T$, could test whether the inhibition scale follows the density-of-states profile and connect this device directly to the Golden-Rule prediction.
Share X Bluesky LinkedIn Reddit HN

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, and a circularity audit.

Referee Report

3 major / 5 minor

Summary. The paper demonstrates inhibition of stimulated Brillouin scattering (SBS) cascades in a chalcogenide microresonator by post-fabrication, all-optical inscription of an intracavity Bragg grating. The grating opens a photonic bandgap at a selected cavity mode, and the authors report that aligning the first-order Stokes mode with this bandgap raises the Brillouin lasing threshold by at least a factor of six (from 5.6 mW baseline to no observed Stokes emission up to 35 mW on-chip pump power), and suppresses a tenth-order Brillouin cascade at 399 mW on-chip pump power. Coupled-mode theory with a split-mode transmission function [Eq. (4)] is used to extract the grating coupling and loss rates. The paper also reports a low-threshold fundamental Brillouin laser with 33% pump-to-Stokes conversion efficiency, and a multi-harmonic grating configuration that splits four adjacent cavity modes.

Significance. If the mechanism is as claimed, the work provides a useful new tool for controlling Brillouin cascading in planar integrated resonators: a reconfigurable, post-fabrication spectral filter that removes the optical final state of a selected Stokes transition. The use of vanishing optical density of states to inhibit SBS is physically well motivated and the main qualitative observations are direct and controlled: baseline lasing spectra versus inhibited spectra under otherwise similar conditions, supported by fits to a standard coupled-mode model. The paper is honest in phrasing the threshold increase as a lower bound, and the re-emergence of Stokes gain on detuning is a useful control experiment. However, the central mechanistic attribution to pure optical-DOS suppression is not fully closed out, because the grating inscription could in principle also modify the acoustic mode or SBS gain coefficient, and no characterization of the acoustic/Brillouin response after inscription is presented.

major comments (3)
  1. [II C, Fig. 3(b)] The 'six-fold increase in threshold' is presented as a quantitative result, but in the inhibited case no lasing threshold is actually measured: the red squares show absence of Stokes emission up to 35 mW, and the re-emergence above this power is attributed to thermorefractive realignment, not to a genuine SBS threshold. The statement 'at least a factor of six' is therefore a reproducible lower bound only if the pump-power step size and the OSA detection floor are specified. Please state explicitly that the inhibited threshold was not directly observed, report the power step and noise floor, and adjust the abstract/conclusion wording to match the measured lower bound.
  2. [II C, III] The mechanistic claim that inhibition arises solely from vanishing optical density of states assumes the grating modifies only the optical final state. The grating period is close to the acoustic wavelength (Lambda ≈ 320 nm versus v_a/f_B ≈ 340 nm for the 7.7-GHz phonon), so the photoinduced structural change that produces the index grating could also modulate density/elasticity and hence alter the Brillouin frequency shift, the SBS gain coefficient, or the optomechanical overlap. The manuscript presents no measurement of the acoustic mode or the SBS gain spectrum after grating inscription. Stokes re-emergence on ~500-MHz detuning is suggestive but does not fully exclude a modified gain spectrum, because detuning changes the phase-matching condition as well as the optical DOS. Please either add a direct characterization of BFS and SBS gain after inscription or explicitly discuss this limitation with supporting evidence from prior work (e.g., Ref. 52) that the gain is unchanged.
  3. [II D, Fig. 4(d)] The claim of 'complete inhibition' of the tenth-order cascade at 399 mW is based on absence of a measurable Stokes signal on the OSA, but the paper itself notes a non-uniform noise floor and ASE leakage into the split modes. To make the claim quantitative, the authors should report an upper bound on the integrated Stokes power (or a suppression ratio relative to the baseline tenth-order spectrum in Fig. 4(b)) and specify the OSA detection limit. As written, 'complete inhibition' is stronger than what the presented data demonstrate.
minor comments (5)
  1. [II C, Fig. 3(b)] The horizontal axis of Fig. 3(b) extends to 45 mW, while the inhibited-case data stop at 35 mW; please annotate the thermorefractive re-emergence region or explain why points above 35 mW are omitted.
  2. [II C] The text describes the device in Fig. 3(a) as a 1.9-um-wide, 33%-etched cavity and the device for the threshold data in Fig. 3(b) as a 2-um-wide, 36%-etched cavity. Please state explicitly which panel corresponds to which device, and whether the baseline and inhibited thresholds in Fig. 3(b) were measured on the same device.
  3. [II A, Eq. (4)] The relationship among tau, tau_T, tau_int and tau_ext is stated twice with slightly inconsistent notation (tau = 1/kappa_T versus tau_T used later); unify the notation and show the intermediate algebraic step from Eqs. (1)-(3) to Eq. (4).
  4. [II D] The expression for grating reflectivity r_B = kappa_B/(2*FSR) is introduced without derivation; a one-line derivation or a citation to the grating-coupling formalism would improve reproducibility.
  5. [I] The statement that within the bandgap 'zero-point fluctuations also cease' is too absolute for a finite-size microresonator with evanescent fields; please soften the wording to reflect the suppression of propagating optical modes.

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged · score 0.0 of 10

No significant circularity: the central inhibition claims are direct measurements, not quantities derived from the fitted coupled-mode parameters; the self-citation to Ref. 52 is non-load-bearing.

full rationale

The paper's headline results (at least 6x threshold increase; complete inhibition of a tenth-order Brillouin cascade at 399 mW) are empirical observations of Stokes emission spectra, not predictions computed from any fitted input. The coupled-mode transfer function Eq. (4) is fitted to RF transmission spectra in Figs. 2(d) and 4(c) to extract kappa_ext, kappa_int, kappa_T, and kappa_B; these parameters characterize the grating-induced mode splitting but are not used to derive the threshold or the inhibition. The attribution of inhibition to vanishing optical density of states is supported by the measured absence of Stokes when aligned to the split mode and re-emergence on ~500 MHz detuning. Ref. [52] is an earlier experimental demonstration by overlapping authors of PBG-based SBS inhibition; it is cited as prior evidence, but the present paper's controlled before/after measurements and detuning behavior stand independently, so the citation is not load-bearing. The reviewer's concern that grating inscription might also modify the acoustic mode or SBS gain is an alternative-mechanism or correctness question, not a circularity: no equation or fitting step defines the inhibition in terms of its own outcome. Accordingly, no circular step can be exhibited from the paper's derivation chain.

Assumptions & free parameters 4 free parameters · 5 assumptions · 0 invented entities

The paper introduces no new physical entities. It relies on standard coupled-mode theory, Fermi's Golden Rule, and material properties of As2S3 from prior literature. The fitted coupling rates are characterization parameters, not free parameters of the central inhibition claim. The main unverified assumption is that the grating leaves the acoustic mode unchanged.

free parameters (4)
  • kappa_ext/2pi = 217 MHz (first device), 213 MHz (second device)
    External coupling rate fitted from transmission spectrum using Eq. (4); used to characterize the mode splitting.
  • kappa_int/2pi = 123 MHz (first device), 125 MHz (second device)
    Intrinsic loss rate fitted from transmission spectrum using Eq. (4); used to characterize the cavity.
  • kappa_T/2pi = 340 MHz (first device), 338 MHz (second device)
    Total decay rate fitted from transmission spectrum using Eq. (4); related to loaded Q-factor.
  • kappa_B/2pi = 571 MHz (first device), 1.85 GHz (second device)
    Bragg coupling rate fitted from transmission spectrum using Eq. (4); determines the width of the photonic bandgap.
assumptions (5)
  • standard math Coupled-mode theory for traveling-wave resonators with a Bragg grating, Eqs. (1)-(4)
    Standard temporal coupled-mode theory; used to fit transmission spectra for extracting parameters.
  • standard math Fermi's Golden Rule: transition rate proportional to final density of states
    Basis for claiming the photonic bandgap inhibits SBS; well-established quantum mechanics.
  • domain assumption As2S3 has high Brillouin gain, about 500 /m/W, and photosensitivity under 1550 nm exposure
    Material properties from prior literature, Refs. 21, 22, 52.
  • domain assumption The inscribed grating modifies only the optical mode structure, not the acoustic mode or optomechanical overlap
    Unstated assumption; no acoustic characterization after inscription is provided.
  • domain assumption Thermorefractive shift causes Stokes re-emergence above 35 mW
    Proposed mechanism for re-emergence; not directly measured, but plausible given known thermal effects.

how reviews work

0 comments
Cite this review

Pith. "Pith review of Brillouin lasers in Bragg grating microresonators." pith.science (2026). https://pith.science/paper/VO4A33JB

@misc{pith2026250603575,
  author       = {Pith},
  title        = {Pith review of: Brillouin lasers in Bragg grating microresonators},
  year         = {2026},
  howpublished = {\url{https://pith.science/paper/VO4A33JB}},
  note         = {Machine review of arXiv:2506.03575}
}
read the original abstract

Chip-scale coherent light sources are required in applications spanning metrology and sensing to telecommunications. Brillouin lasers (BLs) offer a route to ultra-coherent optical sources in compact microresonators with free spectral range (FSR) matched to the Brillouin frequency shift (BFS). However, BFS - FSR matching typically facilitates cascaded Brillouin scattering, constraining achievable BL output power and coherence. Here, we demonstrate inhibition of cascading in a planar-integrated chalcogenide microresonator by exploiting the photonic bandgap (PBG) associated with a post-fabrication inscribed, reconfigurable intracavity Bragg grating. The PBG inhibits energy transfer within the target Brillouin scattering pathway, such as from pump to first-order Stokes wave. As a quantitative measure of Brillouin scattering inhibition, we report at least six-fold increase in threshold for onset of BL oscillation, which is ultimately limited by thermorefraction. For on-chip pump power of 399 mW, sufficient for a tenth-order Brillouin cascade, complete inhibition was achieved. Our work positions Bragg grating microresonators as an enabling platform for high performance on-chip BL sources, with reconfigurable modes of operation.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2506.03575 by the authors.

Figure 1
Figure 1. FIG. 1 [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p003_1.png] view at source ↗
Figure 2
Figure 2. FIG. 2 [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p005_2.png] view at source ↗
Figure 3
Figure 3. FIG. 3 [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p006_3.png] view at source ↗
Figures from the paper (1 more)
Figure 4
Figure 4. Figure 4: FIG. 4 [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p007_4.png]

Discussion (0). Sign in to comment.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

86 extracted references · 74 canonical work pages

  1. [1]

    Kikuchi, Fundamentals of coherent optical fiber com- munications, Journal of Lightwave Technology34, 157 (2015)

    K. Kikuchi, Fundamentals of coherent optical fiber com- munications, Journal of Lightwave Technology34, 157 (2015)

    2015

  2. [2]

    Pfeifle, V

    J. Pfeifle, V. Brasch, M. Lauermann, Y. Yu, D. Wegner, T. Herr, K. Hartinger, P. Schindler, J. Li, D. Hillerkuss, et al., Coherent terabit communications with microres- onator Kerr frequency combs, Nature Photonics8, 375 (2014)

    2014

  3. [3]

    Sabri, S

    N. Sabri, S. Aljunid, M. Salim, R. B. Ahmad, and R. Ka- maruddin, Toward optical sensors: Review and applica- tions, inJournal of Physics: Conference Series, Vol. 423 (IOP Publishing, 2013) p. 012064

    2013

  4. [4]

    M. F. Ferreira, E. Castro-Camus, D. J. Ottaway, J. M. L´ opez-Higuera, X. Feng, W. Jin, Y. Jeong, N. Picqu´ e, L. Tong, B. M. Reinhard,et al., Roadmap on optical sensors, Journal of Optics19, 083001 (2017)

    2017

  5. [5]

    Marpaung, J

    D. Marpaung, J. Yao, and J. Capmany, Integrated mi- crowave photonics, Nature Photonics13, 80 (2019)

    2019

  6. [6]

    Capmany, J

    J. Capmany, J. Mora, I. Gasulla, J. Sancho, J. Lloret, and S. Sales, Microwave photonic signal processing, Journal of Lightwave Technology31, 571 (2012)

    work page 2012

  7. [7]

    Yao, Microwave photonics, Journal of Lightwave Tech- nology27, 314 (2009)

    J. Yao, Microwave photonics, Journal of Lightwave Tech- nology27, 314 (2009)

    work page 2009

  8. [8]

    Wehner, D

    S. Wehner, D. Elkouss, and R. Hanson, Quantum inter- net: A vision for the road ahead, Science362(2018)

    work page 2018

Show all 86 references
  1. [9]

    A. D. Ludlow, M. M. Boyd, J. Ye, E. Peik, and P. O. Schmidt, Optical atomic clocks, Reviews of Modern Physics87, 637 (2015)

    2015

  2. [10]

    C. L. Degen, F. Reinhard, and P. Cappellaro, Quantum sensing, Reviews of Modern Physics89, 035002 (2017)

    2017

  3. [11]

    W. Loh, J. Stuart, D. Reens, C. D. Bruzewicz, D. Braje, J. Chiaverini, P. W. Juodawlkis, J. M. Sage, and R. Mc- Connell, Operation of an optical atomic clock with a Bril- louin laser subsystem, Nature588, 244 (2020)

    2020

  4. [12]

    Collis, Lidar, Applied Optics9, 1782 (1970)

    R. Collis, Lidar, Applied Optics9, 1782 (1970)

    1970

  5. [13]

    J. Aasi, B. Abbott, R. Abbott, T. Abbott, M. Aber- nathy, K. Ackley, C. Adams, T. Adams, P. Addesso, R. Adhikari,et al., Advanced ligo, Classical and Quan- tum Gravity32, 074001 (2015)

    2015

  6. [14]

    Brillouin, Diffusion de la lumi` ere et des rayons x par un corps transparent homog` ene, inAnnales de physique, Vol

    L. Brillouin, Diffusion de la lumi` ere et des rayons x par un corps transparent homog` ene, inAnnales de physique, Vol. 9 (1922) pp. 88–122

    1922

  7. [15]

    R. Pant, C. G. Poulton, D.-Y. Choi, H. Mcfarlane, S. Hile, E. Li, L. Thevenaz, B. Luther-Davies, S. J. Mad- den, and B. J. Eggleton, On-chip stimulated Brillouin scattering, Optics Express19, 8285 (2011)

    2011

  8. [16]

    Merklein, I

    M. Merklein, I. V. Kabakova, A. Zarifi, and B. J. Eggle- ton, 100 years of Brillouin scattering: Historical and fu- ture perspectives, Applied Physics Reviews9(2022)

    2022

  9. [17]

    K. Hill, B. Kawasaki, and D. Johnson, Cw Brillouin laser, Applied Physics Letters28, 608 (1976)

    1976

  10. [18]

    Morrison, A

    B. Morrison, A. Casas-Bedoya, G. Ren, K. Vu, Y. Liu, A. Zarifi, T. G. Nguyen, D.-Y. Choi, D. Marpaung, S. J. Madden,et al., Compact Brillouin devices through hy- brid integration on silicon, Optica4, 847 (2017)

    2017

  11. [19]

    I. V. Kabakova, R. Pant, D.-Y. Choi, S. Debbarma, B. Luther-Davies, S. J. Madden, and B. J. Eggleton, Narrow linewidth Brillouin laser based on chalcogenide photonic chip, Optics Letters38, 3208 (2013)

    2013

  12. [20]

    D.-G. Kim, S. Han, J. Hwang, I. H. Do, D. Jeong, J.-H. Lim, Y.-H. Lee, M. Choi, Y.-H. Lee, D.-Y. Choi,et al., Universal light-guiding geometry for on-chip resonators having extremely high Q-factor, Nature Communications 11, 5933 (2020)

    2020

  13. [21]

    B. J. Eggleton, B. Luther-Davies, and K. Richardson, Chalcogenide photonics, Nature Photonics5, 141 (2011)

    2011

  14. [22]

    B. J. Eggleton, C. G. Poulton, P. T. Rakich, M. J. Steel, and G. Bahl, Brillouin integrated photonics, Nature Pho- tonics13, 664 (2019)

    2019

  15. [23]

    J. Li, H. Lee, T. Chen, and K. J. Vahala, Characteriza- tion of a high coherence, Brillouin microcavity laser on silicon, Optics Express20, 20170 (2012)

    2012

  16. [24]

    N. T. Otterstrom, R. O. Behunin, E. A. Kittlaus, Z. Wang, and P. T. Rakich, A silicon Brillouin laser, Sci- ence360, 1113 (2018)

    2018

  17. [25]

    K. Ye, H. Feng, R. Te Morsche, C. Wei, Y. Klaver, A. Mishra, Z. Zheng, A. Keloth, A. Tarık I¸ sık, Z. Chen, et al., Integrated Brillouin photonics in thin-film lithium niobate, Science Advances11, eadv4022 (2025)

    2025

  18. [26]

    Gundavarapu, G

    S. Gundavarapu, G. M. Brodnik, M. Puckett, T. Huff- man, D. Bose, R. Behunin, J. Wu, T. Qiu, C. Pinho, N. Chauhan,et al., Sub-hertz fundamental linewidth photonic integrated Brillouin laser, Nature Photonics13, 60 (2019)

    2019

  19. [27]

    Smith, F

    S. Smith, F. Zarinetchi, and S. Ezekiel, Narrow-linewidth stimulated Brillouin fiber laser and applications, Optics Letters16, 393 (1991)

    1991

  20. [28]

    H. Lee, T. Chen, J. Li, K. Y. Yang, S. Jeon, O. Painter, and K. J. Vahala, Chemically etched ultrahigh-Q wedge- resonator on a silicon chip, Nature Photonics6, 369 (2012)

    2012

  21. [29]

    D. Kim, M. Harfouche, H. Wang, C. T. Santis, Y. Vi- lenchik, N. Satyan, G. Rakuljic, and A. Yariv, Con- sequences of quantum noise control for the relaxation resonance frequency and phase noise in heterogeneous Silicon/III–V lasers, Scientific Reports12, 312 (2022)

    2022

  22. [30]

    Debut, S

    A. Debut, S. Randoux, and J. Zemmouri, Linewidth nar- rowing in Brillouin lasers: Theoretical analysis, Physical Review A62, 023803 (2000)

    2000

  23. [31]

    Suh, Q.-F

    M.-G. Suh, Q.-F. Yang, and K. J. Vahala, Phonon- limited-linewidth of Brillouin lasers at cryogenic temper- atures, Physical Review Letters119, 143901 (2017). 10

    2017

  24. [32]

    I. S. Grudinin, H. Lee, O. Painter, and K. J. Vahala, Phonon laser action in a tunable two-level system, Phys- ical Review Letters104, 083901 (2010)

    2010

  25. [33]

    Li, M.-G

    J. Li, M.-G. Suh, and K. Vahala, Microresonator Bril- louin gyroscope, Optica4, 346 (2017)

    2017

  26. [34]

    J. Li, H. Lee, and K. J. Vahala, Microwave synthesizer using an on-chip Brillouin oscillator, Nature Communi- cations4, 2097 (2013)

    2013

  27. [35]

    Merklein, B

    M. Merklein, B. Stiller, I. V. Kabakova, U. S. Mutu- gala, K. Vu, S. J. Madden, B. J. Eggleton, and R. Slav ´ ık, Widely tunable, low phase noise microwave source based on a photonic chip, Optics Letters41, 4633 (2016)

    2016

  28. [36]

    T. F. B¨ uttner, M. Merklein, I. V. Kabakova, D. D. Hud- son, D.-Y. Choi, B. Luther-Davies, S. J. Madden, and B. J. Eggleton, Phase-locked, chip-based, cascaded stim- ulated Brillouin scattering, Optica1, 311 (2014)

    2014

  29. [37]

    M. Nie, J. Musgrave, K. Jia, J. Bartos, S. Zhu, Z. Xie, and S.-W. Huang, Turnkey photonic flywheel in a microresonator-filtered laser, Nature Communications 15, 55 (2024)

    2024

  30. [38]

    Zhang, S

    M. Zhang, S. Ding, X. Li, K. Pu, S. Lei, M. Xiao, and X. Jiang, Strong interactions between solitons and back- ground light in brillouin-kerr microcombs, Nature Com- munications15, 1661 (2024)

    2024

  31. [39]

    R. O. Behunin, N. T. Otterstrom, P. T. Rakich, S. Gun- davarapu, and D. J. Blumenthal, Fundamental noise dy- namics in cascaded-order Brillouin lasers, Physical Re- view A98, 023832 (2018)

    2018

  32. [40]

    M. Wang, C. Liu, X. Zhou, J. Li, Z. Wang, D.-Q. Yang, Q.-F. Yang, and B.-B. Li, Cascading-induced fundamen- tal linewidth enhancement of a microcavity Brillouin laser, ACS Photonics (2025)

    2025

  33. [41]

    Puckett, D

    M. Puckett, D. Bose, K. Nelson, and D. J. Blumenthal, Higher order cascaded SBS suppression using gratings in a photonic integrated ring resonator laser, inCLEO: Sci- ence and Innovations(Optica Publishing Group, 2019) pp. SM4O–1

    2019

  34. [42]

    Wang, Z.-G

    M. Wang, Z.-G. Hu, C. Lao, Y. Wang, X. Jin, X. Zhou, Y. Lei, Z. Wang, W. Liu, Q.-F. Yang,et al., Taming Bril- louin optomechanics using supermode microresonators, Physical Review X14, 011056 (2024)

    2024

  35. [43]

    D. Jin, Z. Bai, Y. Chen, W. Fan, Y. Wang, Z. L¨ u, and R. P. Mildren, Intrinsic cascade-free intramode scattering Brillouin laser, APL Photonics8(2023)

    2023

  36. [44]

    K. Liu, J. Wang, N. Chauhan, M. W. Harrington, K. D. Nelson, and D. J. Blumenthal, Integrated photonic molecule Brillouin laser with a high-power sub-100-mhz fundamental linewidth, Optics Letters49, 45 (2023)

    2023

  37. [45]

    H. Wang, L. Wu, Z. Yuan, and K. Vahala, Towards milli- hertz laser frequency noise on a chip, inCLEO: Science and Innovations(Optica Publishing Group, 2021) pp. SF2O–2

    2021

  38. [46]

    Y. Qin, S. Ding, M. Zhang, Y. Wang, Q. Shi, Z. Li, J. Wen, M. Xiao, and X. Jiang, High-power, low-noise Brillouin laser on a silicon chip, Optics Letters47, 1638 (2022)

    2022

  39. [47]

    Fujita, S

    M. Fujita, S. Takahashi, Y. Tanaka, T. Asano, and S. Noda, Simultaneous inhibition and redistribution of spontaneous light emission in photonic crystals, Science 308, 1296 (2005)

    2005

  40. [48]

    L. Helt, A. M. Bra´ nczyk, M. Liscidini, and M. Steel, Par- asitic photon-pair suppression via photonic stop-band en- gineering, Physical Review Letters118, 073603 (2017)

    2017

  41. [49]

    Sakoda and K

    K. Sakoda and K. Sakoda,Optical properties of photonic crystals, Vol. 2 (Springer, 2005)

    2005

  42. [50]

    Yablonovitch, Photonic band-gap structures, Journal of the Optical Society of America B10, 283 (1993)

    E. Yablonovitch, Photonic band-gap structures, Journal of the Optical Society of America B10, 283 (1993)

    1993

  43. [51]

    Yablonovitch, Inhibited spontaneous emission in solid- state physics and electronics, Physical Review Letters58, 2059 (1987)

    E. Yablonovitch, Inhibited spontaneous emission in solid- state physics and electronics, Physical Review Letters58, 2059 (1987)

    1987

  44. [52]

    Merklein, I

    M. Merklein, I. V. Kabakova, T. F. B¨ uttner, D.-Y. Choi, B. Luther-Davies, S. J. Madden, and B. J. Eggleton, En- hancing and inhibiting stimulated Brillouin scattering in photonic integrated circuits, Nature Communications6, 6396 (2015)

    2015

  45. [53]

    P. A. M. Dirac, The quantum theory of the emission and absorption of radiation, Proceedings of the Royal Society of London. Series A, Containing Papers of a Mathemat- ical and Physical Character114, 243 (1927)

    1927

  46. [54]

    Fermi,Nuclear physics: a course given by En- rico Fermi at the University of Chicago(University of Chicago press, 1950)

    E. Fermi,Nuclear physics: a course given by En- rico Fermi at the University of Chicago(University of Chicago press, 1950)

    1950

  47. [55]

    Seitz,LI Schiff, Quantum Mechanics(1950)

    F. Seitz,LI Schiff, Quantum Mechanics(1950)

    1950

  48. [56]

    Choudhary, B

    A. Choudhary, B. Morrison, I. Aryanfar, S. Shahnia, M. Pagani, Y. Liu, K. Vu, S. Madden, D. Marpaung, and B. J. Eggleton, Advanced integrated microwave sig- nal processing with giant on-chip Brillouin gain, Journal of Lightwave Technology35, 846 (2016)

    2016

  49. [57]

    J. A. Black, G. Brodnik, H. Liu, S.-P. Yu, D. R. Carlson, J. Zang, T. C. Briles, and S. B. Papp, Optical-parametric oscillation in photonic-crystal ring resonators, Optica9, 1183 (2022)

    2022

  50. [58]

    S.-P. Yu, D. C. Cole, H. Jung, G. T. Moille, K. Srini- vasan, and S. B. Papp, Spontaneous pulse formation in edgeless photonic crystal resonators, Nature Photonics 15, 461 (2021)

    2021

  51. [59]

    Kippenberg, S

    T. Kippenberg, S. Spillane, and K. Vahala, Modal cou- pling in traveling-wave resonators, Optics Letters27, 1669 (2002)

    2002

  52. [60]

    B. E. Little, J.-P. Laine, and S. T. Chu, Surface- roughness-induced contradirectional coupling in ring and disk resonators, Optics Letters22, 4 (1997)

    1997

  53. [61]

    A. Li, T. Van Vaerenbergh, P. De Heyn, P. Bienstman, and W. Bogaerts, Backscattering in silicon microring res- onators: a quantitative analysis, Laser & Photonics Re- views10, 420 (2016)

    2016

  54. [62]

    Huang, K

    Q. Huang, K. Ma, and S. He, Experimental demonstra- tion of single mode-splitting in microring with Bragg gratings, IEEE Photonics Technology Letters27, 1402 (2015)

    2015

  55. [63]

    Donzella, A

    V. Donzella, A. Sherwali, J. Flueckiger, S. M. Grist, S. T. Fard, and L. Chrostowski, Design and fabrication of SOI micro-ring resonators based on sub-wavelength grating waveguides, Optics Express23, 4791 (2015)

    2015

  56. [64]

    Shokooh-Saremi, V

    M. Shokooh-Saremi, V. G. Ta’eed, I. Littler, D. J. Moss, B. J. Eggleton, Y. Ruan, and B. Luther-Davies, Ultra- strong, well-apodised Bragg gratings in chalcogenide rib waveguides, Electronics Letters41, 738 (2005)

    2005

  57. [65]

    C. K. Lai, M. Merklein, D.-Y. Choi, K. Yan, A. Casas Bedoya, S. J. Madden, and B. J. Eggleton, Pho- tosensitivity and optical nonlinearity in arsenic selenide planar waveguides, Optical Materials Express13, 2808 (2023)

    2023

  58. [66]

    N. J. Baker, H. W. Lee, I. C. Littler, C. M. d. Sterke, B. J. Eggleton, D.-Y. Choi, S. Madden, and B. Luther- Davies, Sampled Bragg gratings in chalcogenide (As 2S3) rib-waveguides, Optics Express14, 9451 (2006). 11

    2006

  59. [67]

    Shokooh-Saremi, V

    M. Shokooh-Saremi, V. G. Ta’eed, N. J. Baker, I. C. Lit- tler, D. J. Moss, B. J. Eggleton, Y. Ruan, and B. Luther- Davies, High-performance Bragg gratings in chalcogenide rib waveguides written with a modified sagnac interfer- ometer, Journal of the Optical Society of America ...

    2006

  60. [68]

    Saliminia, K

    A. Saliminia, K. Le Foulgoc, A. Villeneuve, T. Galstian, S. LaRochell, and K. Richardson, Photoinduced Bragg gratings in multilayer channel waveguides of chalcogenide glasses, inBragg Gratings, Photosensitivity, and Poling in Glass Waveguides(Optica Publishing Group, 1999) p. CB5

    1999

  61. [69]

    Saliminia, A

    A. Saliminia, A. Villeneuve, T. V. Galstyan, S. LaRochelle, and K. Richardson, First-and second- order Bragg gratings in single-mode planar waveguides of chalcogenide glasses, Journal of Lightwave Technology 17, 837 (1999)

    1999

  62. [70]

    Pfeiffer, M

    G. Pfeiffer, M. Paesler, and S. Agarwal, Reversible pho- todarkening of amorphous arsenic chalcogens, Journal of Non-Crystalline Solids130, 111 (1991)

    1991

  63. [71]

    B. Shen, H. Lin, S. Sharif Azadeh, J. Nojic, M. Kang, F. Merget, K. A. Richardson, J. Hu, and J. Witzens, Reconfigurable frequency-selective resonance splitting in chalcogenide microring resonators, ACS Photonics7, 499 (2020)

    2020

  64. [72]

    J. Zhu, T. M. Horning, M. Zohrabi, W. Park, and J. T. Gopinath, Photo-induced writing and erasing of gratings in As 2S3 chalcogenide microresonators, Optica7, 1645 (2020)

    2020

  65. [73]

    Monat, M

    C. Monat, M. Spurny, C. Grillet, L. O’Faolain, T. F. Krauss, B. J. Eggleton, D. Bulla, S. Madden, and B. Luther-Davies, Third-harmonic generation in slow- light chalcogenide glass photonic crystal waveguides, Op- tics Letters36, 2818 (2011)

    2011

  66. [74]

    K. Liu, M. W. Harrington, K. D. Nelson, R. O. Behunin, S. B. Papp, and D. J. Blumenthal, Photonic integrated cascade-inhibited Brillouin laser with sub-100-mHz fun- damental linewidth, inCLEO: Science and Innovations (Optica Publishing Group, 2022) pp. SF2K–1

    2022

  67. [75]

    Y. Li, D. Xia, H. Cheng, L. Luo, L. Wang, S. Zeng, S. Yang, L. Li, B. Chen, B. Zhang,et al., Low-loss com- pact chalcogenide microresonators for efficient stimulated Brillouin lasers, Optics Letters49, 4529 (2024)

    2024

  68. [76]

    J. Song, Y. Wei, C. Wang, S. Yang, Y. Li, T. Feng, X. Guo, and Z. Li, High-efficiency Brillouin lasing in a planar GeSbS spiral-ring resonator, Chinese Optics Let- ters22, 071902 (2024)

    2024

  69. [77]

    W. Loh, S. B. Papp, and S. A. Diddams, Noise and dy- namics of stimulated-Brillouin-scattering microresonator lasers, Physical Review A91, 053843 (2015)

    2015

  70. [78]

    and ∆νis the Brillouin gain linewidth typically measured with a pump–probe heterodyne method [79] or inferred directly from the acoustic decay time [80]. Con- sequently, the system operates in a quasi-CW regime, that is, during the transit of a pulse, the waveguide effectively...

    2009

  71. [79]

    Nilsson and G

    G. Nilsson and G. Nelin, Phonon dispersion relations in Ge at 80 K, Physical Review B3, 364 (1971)

    1971

  72. [80]

    C. K. Lai, D.-Y. Choi, N. J. Athanasios, K. Yan, W. Y. Chong, S. Debbarma, H. Ahmad, B. J. Eggleton, M. Merklein, and S. J. Madden, Hybrid chalcogenide- germanosilicate waveguides for high performance stimu- lated Brillouin scattering applications, Advanced Func- tional Materi...

    2022

  73. [81]

    Merklein, B

    M. Merklein, B. Stiller, K. Vu, S. J. Madden, and B. J. Eggleton, A chip-integrated coherent photonic-phononic memory, Nature Communications8, 574 (2017)

    2017

  74. [82]

    N. R. Broderick and C. M. de Sterke, Theory of grating superstructures, Physical Review E55, 3634 (1997)

    1997

  75. [83]

    Eggleton, P

    B. Eggleton, P. Krug, L. Poladian, and F. Ouellette, Long periodic superstructure Bragg gratings in optical fibres, Electronics Letters30, 1620 (1994)

    1994

  76. [84]

    B. J. Eggleton, C. M. de Sterke, and R. Slusher, Nonlin- ear propagation in superstructure Bragg gratings, Optics Letters21, 1223 (1996)

    1996

  77. [85]

    Carmon, L

    T. Carmon, L. Yang, and K. J. Vahala, Dynamical ther- mal behavior and thermal self-stability of microcavities, Optics Express12, 4742 (2004)

    2004

  78. [86]

    Ahmad and M

    R. Ahmad and M. Rochette, Photosensitivity at 1550 nm and Bragg grating inscription in As2Se3 chalcogenide microwires, Applied Physics Letters99(2011)

    2011

Pith tools

Reviewed August 7, 2026 · model on record in the stance chip above.