Pith. sign in

REVIEW 2 major objections 2 minor 72 references

Tracing the Star Formation History of the Universe through Thermal Free-Free Emission with the SKA

T0 review · 2 major / 2 minor · reviewed 2026-06-25 · grok-4.3

Challenge this review Re-run · record.json Download PDF Read on arXiv ↗

Pith's one-line read SKA multi-band surveys can recover thermal star formation rates in 15000 galaxies out to redshift 7 with 0.1 dex precision.

desk verdict Forecasts 15k galaxy detections and 0.1 dex thermal SFR precision with a specific SKA-Mid multi-band setup, but the numbers rest entirely on T-RECS matching real high-z radio properties. read the letter →

arxiv 2606.25689 v1 pith:VPKWABMB submitted 2026-06-24 astro-ph.GA

Hiddo S. B. Algera , Mark Sargent , Eric J. Murphy , Fangxia An This is my paper · ORCID
classification astro-ph.GA
keywords starformationratedensityfree-freeemissionSKAradiocontinuumgalaxysurveyscosmichistoryhighredshiftgalaxies
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal

The pith

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The reading

The paper forecasts the performance of a proposed matched-depth multi-band SKA-Mid survey covering 0.25 square degrees across frequencies from 0.35 to 15.4 GHz. Simulations show that this setup detects about 15000 star-forming galaxies in all bands out to redshift 7. Fitting the radio spectra allows recovery of the thermal free-free emission fraction without bias, producing small uncertainties on the derived star formation rates that support constraints on the cosmic star formation rate density when combined with other measurements.

What carries the argument

Multi-frequency fitting of the radio spectrum to isolate the thermal free-free emission component from the synchrotron emission.

What would settle it

Actual observations from the SKA survey revealing a significantly different number of detected galaxies or larger uncertainties in the recovered thermal star formation rates than predicted.

Watch

Extended reading notes

Core claim

Using simulations of the faint radio sky, an ambitious matched-depth multi-band SKA-Mid survey covering 0.25 square degrees from 0.35 to 15.4 GHz is predicted to detect about 15000 star-forming galaxies in all bands out to redshift 7. Established fitting techniques applied to the data show that thermal fractions and synchrotron spectral indices can be constrained without bias, with uncertainties on the thermal star formation rates of 0.1 dex or less for galaxies at the knee of the radio luminosity function. This allows the inferred distribution of thermal fractions to be combined with wider low-frequency luminosity function measurements to obtain robust constraints on the cosmic star formati

Load-bearing premise

Simulations of the radio properties of star-forming galaxies at redshifts up to 7 accurately capture the real thermal free-free emission and synchrotron characteristics.

Editorial extensions

If this is right

  • Uncertainties on thermal star formation rates remain below 0.1 dex for galaxies at the knee of the luminosity function at all redshifts.
  • The thermal fraction distribution from the survey enables robust cosmic star formation rate density constraints when combined with low-frequency luminosity functions.
  • Approximately 15000 star-forming galaxies are detectable across all bands out to redshift 7.
  • Thermal fractions and synchrotron spectral indices can be recovered in an unbiased manner from the multi-band data.

Reading between the lines

Editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • This method supplies a dust-unbiased measure of star formation that can test results from other wavelengths.
  • The precision achieved may help clarify the evolution of star formation activity in the early universe.
  • Applying similar fitting to future deeper surveys could extend the constraints beyond redshift 7.
Share X Bluesky LinkedIn Reddit HN

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, simulated authors' rebuttal, and a circularity audit.

Referee Report

2 major / 2 minor

Summary. The paper forecasts the performance of a matched-depth multi-band AA4 SKA-Mid survey (Bands 1–5b over 0.25 deg², 0.35–15.4 GHz) using the T-RECS simulation suite. It predicts detection of ∼1.5×10^4 star-forming galaxies out to z≈7, unbiased recovery of thermal fractions f_th and synchrotron indices via established fitting, thermal SFR uncertainties ≲0.1 dex at the knee of the radio luminosity function, and, after convolution with low-frequency luminosity functions, robust constraints on the cosmic SFR density to z∼7.

Significance. If the underlying simulation inputs are reliable, the work supplies a concrete, quantitative forecast for how SKA-Mid multi-band data can separate thermal free-free emission and thereby improve measurements of the high-redshift star-formation history; the statistical sample size and quoted precision would be a useful planning benchmark for SKA early science.

major comments (2)
  1. [Methods (T-RECS and mock survey)] Methods section on T-RECS application and mock survey construction: the central predictions (detection numbers, ≲0.1 dex thermal SFR uncertainties, and subsequent SFRD constraints) are obtained by injecting T-RECS galaxies as both mock data and ground truth. No external high-z observational anchor (ALMA 100 GHz stacks, JVLA 30 GHz data, or similar) is cited to validate the joint distribution of thermal free-free luminosity, synchrotron spectral index, or any curvature/free-free absorption at rest-frame frequencies ≳25 GHz for z up to 7. This assumption is load-bearing for translating the simulated fitting results to real observations.
  2. [Results (uncertainty recovery)] Results section on recovered uncertainties: the quoted ≲0.1 dex thermal SFR precision at the knee is reported for galaxies across redshift, yet the text provides no explicit sensitivity test showing how these uncertainties degrade if the input synchrotron indices or thermal fractions in T-RECS are varied within plausible observational ranges at z>4.
minor comments (2)
  1. [Methods] The abstract and main text refer to “established fitting techniques” without naming the specific method (e.g., MCMC, least-squares with fixed priors) or providing the functional form used for the multi-band spectral decomposition; this should be stated explicitly for reproducibility.
  2. [Results] Figure captions and text should clarify whether the reported 1.5×10^4 detections refer to sources detected in all bands simultaneously or to the union across bands; the distinction affects the interpretation of the f_th recovery statistics.

Simulated Author's Rebuttal

2 responses · 1 unresolved

We thank the referee for their constructive report and positive assessment of the work's significance for SKA planning. We address each major comment below. We agree that the simulation-based nature of the forecasts requires additional discussion of assumptions and robustness tests, which we will incorporate via partial revisions.

read point-by-point responses

  1. Referee: Methods section on T-RECS application and mock survey construction: the central predictions (detection numbers, ≲0.1 dex thermal SFR uncertainties, and subsequent SFRD constraints) are obtained by injecting T-RECS galaxies as both mock data and ground truth. No external high-z observational anchor (ALMA 100 GHz stacks, JVLA 30 GHz data, or similar) is cited to validate the joint distribution of thermal free-free luminosity, synchrotron spectral index, or any curvature/free-free absorption at rest-frame frequencies ≳25 GHz for z up to 7. This assumption is load-bearing for translating the simulated fitting results to real observations.

    Authors: We acknowledge that T-RECS provides the joint distributions used for both mock observations and truth, and that direct high-z anchors at rest-frame ≳25 GHz remain limited. T-RECS is calibrated on existing lower-z radio data with extrapolations for high-z evolution; we will add a new subsection in Methods explicitly discussing these assumptions, citing relevant high-z continuum constraints (e.g., JVLA 3 GHz and ALMA 100 GHz stacks where they overlap in frequency), and noting the extrapolation as a limitation of current knowledge rather than a validated input. The multi-band fitting methodology itself is drawn from established lower-z techniques. revision: partial

  2. Referee: Results section on recovered uncertainties: the quoted ≲0.1 dex thermal SFR precision at the knee is reported for galaxies across redshift, yet the text provides no explicit sensitivity test showing how these uncertainties degrade if the input synchrotron indices or thermal fractions in T-RECS are varied within plausible observational ranges at z>4.

    Authors: We agree an explicit sensitivity test is warranted. In the revised manuscript we will add a new subsection (and associated figure) that perturbs the input synchrotron index and thermal fraction distributions in T-RECS within ranges consistent with existing z>4 radio observations, then re-runs the fitting pipeline to quantify degradation in the recovered thermal SFR uncertainties. This will directly address robustness at z>4. revision: yes

standing simulated objections not resolved
  • Direct external observational validation of the T-RECS joint distributions for thermal free-free luminosity and synchrotron properties at z≈7 and rest-frame frequencies ≳25 GHz, as suitable high-frequency, high-redshift data do not yet exist.

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged · score 0.0 of 10

No significant circularity; forecasts from external T-RECS mocks

full rationale

The paper's derivation begins with the external T-RECS simulation suite as input, applies standard multi-band fitting techniques to mock SKA-Mid observations, and reports resulting detection counts and uncertainty estimates as forecasts. No quoted step reduces a claimed prediction to a fitted parameter by construction, nor does any load-bearing premise rely on a self-citation chain whose authors overlap with the present work. The central results remain independent of quantities defined or tuned inside the paper itself.

Assumptions & free parameters 0 free parameters · 1 assumptions · 0 invented entities

The forecast rests on the domain assumption that the T-RECS simulation suite correctly captures the radio properties of high-redshift galaxies; no new free parameters are introduced in the abstract, and no new physical entities are postulated.

assumptions (1)
  • domain assumption The T-RECS simulation suite accurately models the faint radio sky including thermal free-free emission components of star-forming galaxies at z up to 7.
    The entire forecast begins from this simulation as the starting point for applying the SKA survey strategy.

how reviews work

0 comments
Cite this review

Pith. "Pith review of Tracing the Star Formation History of the Universe through Thermal Free-Free Emission with the SKA." pith.science (2026). https://pith.science/paper/VPKWABMB

@misc{pith2026260625689,
  author       = {Pith},
  title        = {Pith review of: Tracing the Star Formation History of the Universe through Thermal Free-Free Emission with the SKA},
  year         = {2026},
  howpublished = {\url{https://pith.science/paper/VPKWABMB}},
  note         = {Machine review of arXiv:2606.25689}
}
abstract

One of the major scientific aims of the SKA is to trace the history of star formation across cosmic time. High-frequency radio surveys are indispensable in this regard, as these are capable of probing thermal free-free emission (FFE) -- the dominant component of the radio continuum of star-forming galaxies above rest-frame frequencies of $\gtrsim25\,$GHz. FFE is a powerful, direct star-formation rate (SFR) indicator, which robustly traces the number of ionizing photons produced by recently formed massive stars in a nearly dust-unbiased manner. In this chapter, we forecast the ability of the SKA to detect FFE in typical star-forming galaxies in the early Universe. Our starting point is the state-of-the-art T-RECS simulation suite of the faint radio sky, to which we apply an ambitious, matched-depth, multi-band AA4 SKA-Mid survey in Bands 1 through 5b, covering an area of $0.25\,\mathrm{deg}^2$ across $0.35 - 15.4\,\mathrm{GHz}$. We predict that such a survey will detect $\sim1.5\times10^4$ star-forming galaxies in all bands out to $z\approx7$, and perform simulations using established fitting techniques to investigate the accuracy with which their thermal FFE can be recovered. We find that thermal fractions ($f_\mathrm{th}$) and synchrotron spectral indices can be constrained in an unbiased manner, and predict uncertainties on the thermal SFRs of $\lesssim 0.1\,\mathrm{dex}$ for galaxies at the knee of the radio luminosity function across redshift. Convolving the distribution of $f_\mathrm{th}$ inferred from the multi-band SKA-Mid survey with wider luminosity function determinations at low radio frequencies will yield robust constraints on the total cosmic star formation rate density out to $z\sim7$.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2606.25689 by the authors.

Figure 1
Figure 1. The typical long-wavelength spectrum of a star-forming galaxy with SFR = 100 𝑀⊙ yr−1 , plotted for a range of redshifts between 𝑧 = 2−9. The radio component assumes a thermal fraction of 𝑓th (1.4 GHz) = 0.1 and a synchrotron slope of 𝛼NT = −0.85, while dust emission is modeled as a modified blackbody with temperature 𝑇dust = 35 K and emissivity index 𝛽IR = 2.0. The individual free-free, synchrotron and dust componen… view at source ↗
Figure 2
Figure 2. Radio luminosity at the rest-frame frequency probed by SKA-Mid Band 2 (𝜈obs = 1.355 GHz) against redshift for galaxies sampled in the central 0.25 deg2 of an SKA-Mid Band 2 pointing with a 5𝜎 = 2.0 𝜇Jy/beam depth. The luminosity limit of the survey is indicated through the dashed black line. Approximately 1.5 × 104 radio sources – the vast majority (≳ 95%) of which are star-forming galaxies – are expected to be dete… view at source ↗
Figure 3
Figure 3. The radio spectrum of an example mock 𝑧 ≈ 2.5 galaxy, as will be identified in large numbers in upcoming deep SKA-Mid surveys. The radio spectrum is sampled in Bands 1, 2, 5a and 5b (red datapoints; central observed-frame frequencies are annotated on the top 𝑥-axis) and decomposed into its synchrotron (red) and free-free (blue) components. The black line and grey shading represent the total spectrum and its uncertai… view at source ↗
Figures from the paper (5 more)
Figure 4
Figure 4. Figure 4: The fitted thermal fractions (left) and synchrotron spectral indices (right) of our mock radio sources as a function of their input values. Contours are drawn at the 0.5, 1, 1.5 and 2𝜎 levels, and individual datapoints are color-coded by 𝛼NT (left) or 𝑓th (1.4 GHz) (ri…
Figure 5
Figure 5. Figure 5: Offset between fitted and input thermal fractions (at 1.4 GHz; Δ 𝑓th = 𝑓th,fit − 𝑓th,input) versus that for the synchrotron slope (Δ𝛼NT, defined analogously) across the full population of mock sources. There are no systematic biases in the recovery of either parameter,…
Figure 6
Figure 6. Figure 6: The accuracy with which the thermal fractions (left) and synchrotron spectral indices (right) can be recovered, as a function of the Band 2 signal-to-noise ratio. Contours and points are as in [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p009_6.png]
Figure 7
Figure 7. Figure 7: The typical 1𝜎 uncertainty on the thermal fraction (left) and synchrotron spectral index (right) as a function of redshift. Three bins of SKA-Mid Band 2 S/N are considered, and only those with ≥ 5 sources are plotted. The solid lines represent the median uncertainty on…
Figure 8
Figure 8. Figure 8: Binned rest-frame 1.4 GHz radio luminosity versus redshift for our mock SKA-Mid survey. The bins are color-coded by their mean free-free S/N. The thick dashed line corresponds to the approximate sensitivity limit, based on the 5𝜎 SKA-Mid Band 2 detection threshold of 2…

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

72 extracted references · 72 canonical work pages

  1. [1]

    H. S. B. Algera et al.ApJ, 903(2):138, Nov. 2020a. doi: 10.3847/1538-4357/abb77b. H. S. B. Algera et al.ApJ, 903(2):139, Nov. 2020b. doi: 10.3847/1538-4357/abb77a. H. S. B. Algera et al.ApJ, 912(1):73, May

    work page doi:10.3847/1538-4357/abb77b

  2. [2]

    doi: 10.3847/1538-4357/abe6a5. H. S. B. Algera et al.ApJ, 924(2):76, Jan

    work page doi:10.3847/1538-4357/abe6a5

  3. [3]

    doi: 10.3847/1538-4357/ac34f5. H. S. B. Algera et al.MNRAS, 518(4):6142–6157, Feb

    work page doi:10.3847/1538-4357/ac34f5

  4. [4]

    doi: 10.1093/mnras/stac3195. F. An et al.MNRAS, 507(2):2643–2658, Oct

    work page doi:10.1093/mnras/stac3195

  5. [5]

    2021, MNRAS, 507, 2643, doi: 10.1093/mnras/stab2290

    doi: 10.1093/mnras/stab2290. F.X.Anetal. InAdvancingAstrophysicswiththeSKA–II(AASKAII).2026. arXivsearch: Report number AASKAII/FangxiaAn01. E. F. Bell.ApJ, 586(2):794–813, Apr

    work page doi:10.1093/mnras/stab2290 2026

  6. [6]

    doi: 10.1086/367829. A. Bonaldi et al.MNRAS, 482(1):2–19, Jan

    work page doi:10.1086/367829

  7. [7]

    doi: 10.1093/mnras/sty2603. M. Bonzini et al.MNRAS, 436(4):3759–3771, Dec

    work page doi:10.1093/mnras/sty2603

  8. [8]

    15 Free-free emission with the SKA H.S.B

    doi: 10.1093/mnras/stt1879. 15 Free-free emission with the SKA H.S.B. Algera et al. R. J. Bouwens et al.ApJ, 803(1):34, Apr

    work page doi:10.1093/mnras/stt1879

Show all 72 references
  1. [9]

    A.Bressan,L.Silva,andG.L.Granato.A&A,392:377–391,Sept.2002

    doi: 10.1088/0004-637X/803/1/34. A.Bressan,L.Silva,andG.L.Granato.A&A,392:377–391,Sept.2002. doi: 10.1051/0004-6361: 20020960. G. Calistro Rivera et al.MNRAS, 469(3):3468–3488, Aug

    2002 doi

  2. [10]

    doi: 10.1093/mnras/stx1040. C. M. Casey et al.ApJ, 862(1):77, July

    doi

  3. [11]

    doi: 10.3847/1538-4357/aac82d. C. M. Casey et al.ApJ, 954(1):31, Sept

    doi

  4. [12]

    doi: 10.3847/1538-4357/acc2bc. Q. Chen et al.ApJ, 972(2):147, Sept

    doi

  5. [13]

    doi: 10.3847/1538-4357/ad5ceb. M. Cirasuolo et al. In S. K. Ramsay, I. S. McLean, and H. Takami, editors,Ground-based and AirborneInstrumentationforAstronomyV,volume9147ofSocietyofPhoto-OpticalInstrumen- tation Engineers (SPIE) Conference Series, page 91470N, July

    doi

  6. [14]

    doi: 10.1117/12.2056012. R. K. Cochrane et al.MNRAS, 523(4):6082–6102, Aug

    doi

  7. [15]

    doi: 10.1093/mnras/stad1602. J. J. Condon.ARA&A, 30:575–611, Jan

    doi

  8. [16]

    doi: 10.1146/annurev.aa.30.090192.003043. J. J. Condon.PASP, 109:166–172, Feb

    doi

  9. [17]

    doi: 10.1086/133871. J. Conway et al.SKA Memos, SKA Memos:1, Feb

    doi

  10. [18]

    doi: 10.18727/0722-6691/5117. G. De Zotti et al.A&A, 689:A272, Sept

    doi

  11. [19]

    doi: 10.1051/0004-6361/202449313. A. Del Moro et al.A&A, 549:A59, Jan

    doi

  12. [20]

    doi: 10.1051/0004-6361/201219880. J. Delhaize et al.A&A, 602:A4, June

    doi

  13. [21]

    doi: 10.1051/0004-6361/201629430. I. Delvecchio et al.A&A, 602:A3, June

    doi

  14. [22]

    doi: 10.1051/0004-6361/201629367. I. Delvecchio et al.A&A, 647:A123, Mar

    doi

  15. [23]

    Euclid Collaboration et al.A&A, 662:A112, June

    doi: 10.1051/0004-6361/202039647. Euclid Collaboration et al.A&A, 662:A112, June

    doi

  16. [24]

    doi: 10.1051/0004-6361/202141938. S. L. Finkelstein et al.ApJL, 946(1):L13, Mar

    doi

  17. [25]

    doi: 10.3847/2041-8213/acade4. D. Foreman-Mackey, D. W. Hogg, D. Lang, and J. Goodman.PASP, 125(925):306, Mar

    doi

  18. [26]

    doi: 10.1086/670067. Y. Fudamoto et al.Nature, 597(7877):489–492, Sept

    doi

  19. [27]

    doi: 10.1038/s41586-021-03846-z. T. J. Galvin et al.MNRAS, 474(1):779–799, Feb

    doi

  20. [28]

    doi: 10.1093/mnras/stx2613. M. Giavalisco et al.ApJL, 600(2):L93–L98, Jan

    doi

  21. [29]

    doi: 10.1086/379232. J. Glenn et al.Journal of Astronomical Telescopes, Instruments, and Systems, 11:031628, July

    doi

  22. [30]

    doi: 10.1117/1.JATIS.11.3.031628. C. Gruppioni et al.A&A, 643:A8, Nov

    doi

  23. [31]

    doi: 10.1051/0004-6361/202038487. T. Hashimoto et al.PASJ, 71(4):71, Aug

    doi

  24. [32]

    doi: 10.1093/pasj/psz049. N. Herrera Ruiz et al.A&A, 607:A132, Nov

    doi

  25. [33]

    doi: 10.1051/0004-6361/201731163. M. T. Huynh et al.MNRAS, 467(1):1222–1230, May

    doi

  26. [34]

    doi: 10.1093/mnras/stx156. H. Inami et al.MNRAS, 515(3):3126–3143, Sept

    doi

  27. [35]

    doi: 10.1093/mnras/stac1779. Y. Isobe et al.ApJ, 956(2):139, Oct

    doi

  28. [36]

    doi: 10.3847/1538-4357/acf376. E. F. Jiménez-Andrade et al.A&A, 625:A114, May

    doi

  29. [37]

    doi: 10.1051/0004-6361/201935178. E. F. Jiménez-Andrade et al.ApJ, 972(1):89, Sept

    doi

  30. [38]

    doi: 10.3847/1538-4357/ad5b5c. A. A. Khostovan et al.ApJSS, 282(1):6, Jan

    doi

  31. [39]

    doi: 10.3847/1538-4365/ae1cb9. U. Klein, U. Lisenfeld, and S. Verley.A&A, 611:A55, Mar

    doi

  32. [40]

    A.Lawrenceetal.MNRAS,379(4):1599–1617,Aug.2007

    doi: 10.1051/0004-6361/ 201731673. A.Lawrenceetal.MNRAS,379(4):1599–1617,Aug.2007. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2966.2007.12040. x. S. K. Leslie et al.ApJ, 899(1):58, Aug

    2007 doi

  33. [41]

    16 Free-free emission with the SKA H.S.B

    doi: 10.3847/1538-4357/aba044. 16 Free-free emission with the SKA H.S.B. Algera et al. S. T. Linden et al.ApJSS, 248(2):25, June

    doi

  34. [42]

    doi: 10.3847/1538-4365/ab8a4d. J. Lyu, S. Alberts, G. H. Rieke, and W. Rujopakarn.ApJ, 941(2):191, Dec

    doi

  35. [43]

    doi: 10.1146/ annurev-astro-081811-125615. V. Mainieri et al.arXiv e-prints, art. arXiv:2403.05398, Mar

  36. [44]

    doi: 10.48550/arXiv.2403. 05398. R. J. McLure et al.MNRAS, 432(4):2696–2716, July

    doi

  37. [45]

    doi: 10.1093/mnras/stt627. O. Miettinen et al.A&A, 602:A54, June

    doi

  38. [46]

    doi: 10.1051/0004-6361/201730443. J. Moldon et al. InAdvancing Astrophysics with the SKA – II (AASKAII)

    doi

  39. [47]

    doi: 10.1093/mnras/stab746. L. K. Morabito et al.MNRAS, 536(1):L32–L37, Jan

    doi

  40. [48]

    doi: 10.1093/mnrasl/slae104. E. J. Murphy.ApJ, 706(1):482–496, Nov

    doi

  41. [49]

    doi: 10.1088/0004-637X/706/1/482. E. J. Murphy et al.ApJL, 709(2):L108–L113, Feb

    doi

  42. [50]

    doi: 10.1088/2041-8205/709/2/L108. E. J. Murphy et al.ApJ, 737(2):67, Aug

    doi

  43. [51]

    doi: 10.1088/0004-637X/737/2/67. E. J. Murphy et al.ApJ, 839(1):35, Apr

    doi

  44. [52]

    doi: 10.3847/1538-4357/aa62fd. E. J. Murphy et al.ApJ, 862(1):20, July

    doi

  45. [53]

    doi: 10.3847/1538-4357/aac5f5. S. Niklas, U. Klein, and R. Wielebinski.A&A, 322:19–28, June

    doi

  46. [54]

    doi: 10.1051/0004-6361/201629436. P. A. Oesch et al.ApJ, 855(2):105, Mar

    doi

  47. [55]

    doi: 10.3847/1538-4357/aab03f. P. Padovani et al.ApJ, 740(1):20, Oct

    doi

  48. [56]

    G.Pelusoetal.arXive-prints,art.arXiv:2509.17536,Sept.2025.doi: 10.48550/arXiv.2509.17536

    doi: 10.1088/0004-637X/740/1/20. G.Pelusoetal.arXive-prints,art.arXiv:2509.17536,Sept.2025.doi: 10.48550/arXiv.2509.17536. I. Prandoni and N. Seymour. InAdvancing Astrophysics with the Square Kilometre Array (AASKA14), page 67, Apr

    2025 doi

  49. [57]

    doi: 10.22323/1.215.0067. I. Prandoni et al. InAdvancing Astrophysics with the SKA – II (AASKAII)

    doi

  50. [58]

    doi: 10.1051/0004-6361/201833399. J. F. Radcliffe et al.A&A, 649:L9, May

    doi

  51. [59]

    doi: 10.1051/0004-6361/202140791. M. T. Sargent et al.ApJSS, 186(2):341–377, Feb. 2010a. doi: 10.1088/0067-0049/186/2/341. M. T. Sargent et al.ApJL, 714(2):L190–L195, May 2010b. doi: 10.1088/2041-8205/714/2/L190. D.R.G.SchleicherandR.Beck.A&A,556:A142,Aug.2013.doi: 10.1051/000...

    doi

  52. [60]

    doi: 10.3847/1538-4357/ad9d0e. F. Tabatabaei et al.ApJ, 989(1):44, Aug

    doi

  53. [61]

    doi: 10.3847/1538-4357/ade233. F. S. Tabatabaei et al.ApJ, 836(2):185, Feb

    doi

  54. [62]

    doi: 10.3847/1538-4357/836/2/185. N. Tamura et al. In C. J. Evans, L. Simard, and H. Takami, editors,Ground-based and Airborne Instrumentation for Astronomy VI, volume 9908 ofSociety of Photo-Optical Instrumentation Engineers (SPIE) Conference Series, page 99081M, Aug

    doi

  55. [63]

    doi: 10.1117/12.2232103. A. P. Thomson et al.MNRAS, 425(3):2203–2211, Sept

    doi

  56. [64]

    17 Free-free emission with the SKA H.S.B

    doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2966.2012. 17 Free-free emission with the SKA H.S.B. Algera et al. 21584.x. A. P. Thomson et al.ApJ, 883(2):204, Oct

    2012 doi

  57. [65]

    doi: 10.3847/1538-4357/ab32e7. K. Tisanić et al.A&A, 621:A139, Jan

    doi

  58. [66]

    doi: 10.1051/0004-6361/201834002. D. van der Vlugt et al.ApJ, 941(1):10, Dec

    doi

  59. [67]

    doi: 10.3847/1538-4357/ac99db. A. van der Wel et al.ApJ, 788(1):28, June

    doi

  60. [68]

    doi: 10.1088/0004-637X/788/1/28. I. H. Whittam et al.MNRAS, 543(1):507–517, Oct

    doi

  61. [69]

    doi: 10.1093/mnras/staf1505. I. Yoon.ApJ, 975(1):15, Nov

    doi

  62. [70]

    M.S.Yun,N.A.Reddy,andJ.J.Condon.ApJ,554(2):803–822,June2001

    doi: 10.3847/1538-4357/ad7385. M.S.Yun,N.A.Reddy,andJ.J.Condon.ApJ,554(2):803–822,June2001. doi: 10.1086/323145. J. A. Zavala et al.ApJ, 909(2):165, Mar

    doi

  63. [71]

    doi: 10.3847/1538-4357/abdb27. J. A. Zavala et al.ApJL, 998(2):L36, Feb

    doi

  64. [72]

    doi: 10.3847/2041-8213/ae382a. 18

    doi

Pith tools

Reviewed June 25, 2026 · model on record in the stance chip above.