Pith. sign in

REVIEW 3 major objections 5 minor 27 references

Analogue of electromagnetically induced transparency with high Q factor in Metal-dielectric metamaterials

T0 review · 3 major / 5 minor · reviewed 2026-08-14 · deepseek-v4-flash

Pith's one-line read A stacked silver-strip/silicon-rod metamaterial produces an EIT transparency window with quality factor up to 28,000.

desk verdict Plausible numerical design study for high-Q EIT in a metal-dielectric stack, but the headline Q number is unsupported and the toroidal mode is not verified in the coupled structure. read the letter →

arxiv 1908.08632 v1 pith:VQABKPRP submitted 2019-08-23 physics.optics

classification physics.optics
keywords electromagneticallyinducedtransparencymetamaterialtoroidaldipolebright-brightcouplinghighqualityfactorslowlightbiosensingmetal-dielectricstack
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal

The pith

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The reading

The paper numerically demonstrates an electromagnetically induced transparency (EIT) analogue in a metal–dielectric metamaterial whose unit cell stacks a silver strip over a silicon rod. The central claim is that destructive interference between a broad electric dipole on the silver strip and a narrow toroidal dipole on the silicon rod produces a sharp transparency window with quality factor up to $Q=28000$ — a regime previously reached only by asymmetric all-dielectric bright–dark designs, not by bright–bright coupling. The paper also shows the window can be tuned by the spacer thickness and by shifting the two layers, reproduces the simulated spectra with a two-particle model, and argues that radiation loss is suppressed and slow light enhanced inside the window. If the claim holds, it offers a simpler, asymmetry-free stacking route to high-$Q$ transparent metamaterials for filters and sensors.

What carries the argument

The load-bearing object is the stacked unit cell: a silver strip (530 nm by 150 nm by 30 nm) above a silicon rod (830 nm by 360 nm by 200 nm), separated by a quartz spacer of thickness $t$. The silver strip acts as the broad bright mode (an electric dipole $P_x$, $Q\approx 6$). The silicon rod acts as the narrow bright mode: its two opposite circular displacement currents create head-to-tail magnetic-field loops, a field configuration whose multipole decomposition is dominated by a toroidal dipole $T_x$. A two-particle coupled-oscillator model, one Lorentzian per bright mode, fits the simulated transmission and links the sharpening window to a coupling coefficient $\kappa$ that falls from 45 THz to 16.5 THz as $t$ grows from 300 nm to 900 nm.

What would settle it

Re-run the multipole decomposition on the full stacked unit cell at the transparency wavelength: if the toroidal dipole is not the dominant scatterer there, the claimed $P_x$–$T_x$ interference mechanism fails. Alternatively, replace the silver strip with a dielectric strip of the same dimensions; if a comparably sharp window survives, the metal's broad electric dipole is not essential to the effect.

Watch

Extended reading notes

Core claim

The paper claims that EIT with a quality factor up to $Q=28000$ can be obtained in a metal–dielectric metamaterial by coupling two bright modes: a broad electric dipole supported by the silver strip and a narrow toroidal dipole supported by the silicon rod. Both layers are excited directly by the incident wave, and because their resonance wavelengths are nearly equal, the two excitation pathways interfere destructively and open a narrow transparency window near 1538 nm. To the authors' knowledge this is the first time a bright–bright coupled structure has reached ultra-high $Q$; the sharp silicon-rod resonance in isolation ($Q\approx 1405$, rising to $1.7\times10^4$ when the rod is lengthened) is the ingredient that lets the stacked design surpass the $Q\approx 10$ typical of plasmonic EIT analogues and approach the $Q\approx 30000$ of asymmetric all-dielectric bright–dark designs.

Load-bearing premise

The load-bearing premise is that the sharp silicon-rod resonance keeps its high-$Q$, toroidal current-loop character when the silver strip is placed on top, so the transparency really comes from electric-dipole–toroidal-dipole interference rather than from a mode reshaped by the metal layer.

Editorial extensions

If this is right

  • A bright–bright, two-layer metal–dielectric design can produce an EIT-like window with $Q$ near $28000$, far above the $Q\approx 10$ of plasmonic EIT and comparable with asymmetric all-dielectric bright–dark designs.
  • The transparency window narrows and its $Q$ rises as the quartz spacer thickens from 300 nm to 900 nm, because the inter-layer coupling coefficient $\kappa$ decreases.
  • Shifting the silver strip along the y-axis changes the coupling strength and can first suppress and then restore the window, so the structure is position-sensitive.
  • Within the EIT window the metamaterial suppresses radiation loss and enhances slow light, which the paper proposes as a route to filters and sensitive chemical and biological sensors.

Reading between the lines

Editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • If the toroidal mode survives fabrication and metal loading, the same stacked bright-bright recipe could be scaled to other wavelength bands by resizing the silicon rod and silver strip, without relying on the structural asymmetry used by bright-dark designs.
  • The window's strong dependence on the silver strip's y-offset suggests the structure could serve as a nanometric displacement sensor, a use the paper only gestures at.
  • Because the reported figures are numerical and silver is lossy, a fabricated sample will almost certainly show a lower $Q$; a direct spectral comparison with the two-particle model would show whether the experimental coupling is the same mechanism.
Share X Bluesky LinkedIn Reddit HN

Signed reviews

No signed human review yet.

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, and a circularity audit.

Referee Report

3 major / 5 minor

Summary. The manuscript reports numerical simulations of a stacked metal-dielectric metamaterial composed of a silver strip array and a silicon rod array separated by a quartz spacer. Under normally incident x-polarized light, the structure is claimed to exhibit an electromagnetically induced transparency (EIT)-like transmission window generated by destructive interference between a broad electric dipole (silver strip) and a narrow toroidal dipole (silicon rod), i.e., a bright-bright coupling scheme. The authors characterize the isolated silver and silicon arrays, present a multipole decomposition for the isolated rod array, sweep the spacer thickness t and in-plane displacements s1/s2, and fit transmission spectra with a two-particle oscillator model. The abstract states a maximum Q factor of 28,000, while the body reports Q = 3700 for t = 900 nm and Q values up to 21,600 in the displacement study.

Significance. If the central claim is correct, the paper would demonstrate that a bright-bright coupled metal-dielectric metamaterial can reach Q factors of order 10^4, a regime previously associated with bright-dark coupled all-dielectric designs. The work is quantitative and includes a systematic parameter study, a multipole decomposition for the isolated rod array, and a coupled-oscillator fit to the simulated spectra. The claimed toroidal-bright-mode mechanism and the high-Q EIT window are, however, not established for the coupled structure, and the headline Q = 28,000 is not supported by any reported result. The significance is therefore conditional on correction of the abstract and on additional verification of the mode identity in the coupled geometry.

major comments (3)
  1. [Abstract, Section 3] The abstract claims "the maximum Q factor is up to 28000," but no result in the manuscript supports this value. Section 3 reports Q = 3700 for the t = 900 nm spacer case, and the displacement study reports Q decreasing from 21600 to 5180 as s2 shifts from 300 nm to 450 nm. The abstract must be corrected or a simulation showing Q = 28,000 must be added and clearly referenced.
  2. [Section 2, Section 3] The toroidal-dipole character of the narrow bright mode is demonstrated only for the isolated silicon rod array via the multipole decomposition in Fig. 3(d). In the coupled structure, the silver strip is placed close to the rods, and the maximum-Q configurations are those with large lateral displacement s2, for which the text invokes "inter-coupling between the silicon rods in adjacent periods" rather than the aligned Px-Tx mechanism described in the abstract. A multipole decomposition or equivalent near-field analysis of the coupled structure is needed to show that the narrow mode is still the toroidal dipole; otherwise the claimed mechanism and the "first bright-bright high-Q EIT via toroidal mode" novelty are not supported.
  3. [Section 3, Eqs. (1)-(3)] The two-particle model is presented as a validation: "In order to validate the two-particle model, we fit 1-Im[chi_eff] to the simulated transmission spectra as shown in Fig.6." Since the parameters k, gamma1, gamma2, A, B, and K are free and are fitted to the same simulated spectra the model is then used to explain, the agreement is a fit rather than an independent test. The existence of the EIT window is not in question, but the explanatory statement "This process can be explained by using two-particle model" should be softened or supplemented by independently derived or geometry-based parameter values.
minor comments (5)
  1. [Section 3, Eqs. (1)-(2)] The typesetting of the coupled-oscillator equations is corrupted in the manuscript (formula substitution characters appear); the equations must be rendered cleanly so the model can be evaluated.
  2. [Section 3, displacement study] The text says "The EIT window disappears when s1=250nm" immediately after discussing the s2 offset; this is likely meant to be s2=250 nm. In addition, two different figures are both numbered Fig. 6 (one for the t-dependence and one for the s1/s2-dependence), and the captions are mixed up; the figure numbering and axis labels should be corrected.
  3. [Section 2, rod length sweep] The sentence "Q value of the toroidal resonance increases greatly from xx to 1.7x10^4" contains a placeholder "xx"; the actual starting Q value should be supplied.
  4. [Abstract and Conclusion] The abstract states that "the slow light effect is improved a lot," but no group index, delay time, or slow-light metric is computed anywhere in the manuscript; either add such a calculation or remove the claim.
  5. [References] Reference [23] is cited for the Fano resonance review, but the author name list appears to contain an error ("B. L. Yanchuk"); the correct citation should be verified. Also, the figure caption for the displacement study contains the typo "silver trip array."

Circularity Check

1 steps flagged · score 4.0 of 10

Two-particle model 'validation' is a fit to the same spectra; the central full-wave simulation remains independent.

  1. fitted input called prediction [Section 3, two-particle model paragraph after Eq. (3), and Fig. 6 caption]
    "To describe the impact of coherent coupling between two bright modes on the EIT in the metamaterial system, we introduce the two-particle model [11]... In order to validate the two-particle model, we fit 1-Im [χeff] to the simulated transmission spectra as shown in Fig.6 (blue dotted lines). Obviously, the fitted results (blue dotted lines) show good agreements with the corresponding numerically simulated results."

    The coupled-oscillator susceptibility contains free parameters (κ, γ1, γ2, A, B, K, and the proportionality factor) that are adjusted so that the model line shape matches the same simulated transmission spectra that the model is then invoked to explain. The 'good agreement' is therefore a property of a least-squares fit, not an independent confirmation of the proposed bright-bright Px-Tx coupling mechanism. Similarly, the reported decrease of κ from 45 THz to 16.5 THz with increasing t is read from the fitted parameter, so the parametric trend is the fitting result, not a prediction. Any coupled-resonator model with enough free parameters could reproduce a Fano-like line shape, so the model cannot by itself establish the toroidal-electric-dipole interference narrative.

full rationale

The central result of the paper is a full-wave CST simulation of a stacked silver-strip/silicon-rod metamaterial showing a narrow transparency window with high Q. That simulation is self-contained: the single-strip and single-rod spectra are computed independently, and the coupled-structure spectrum is obtained from Maxwell solvers, not from the two-particle model. The paper's claimed novelty (first bright-bright high-Q EIT via toroidal dipole coupling) rests on identifying the isolated silicon-rod resonance as a toroidal dipole through multipole decomposition and then assuming this mode persists in the coupled structure. That assumption is a correctness gap rather than a circularity: the mode identity is not re-derived from the coupled-structure simulation, but it is also not defined in terms of the claimed output. The clearest circular element is the 'validation' of the two-particle model: the model is fitted to the same simulated spectra it is then said to explain, and the coupling coefficients and Q-factor trends are extracted from that fit. This reduces the explanatory model's confirmation to a curve-fitted restatement of the input spectra. However, the transparency window and its Q factor are established by the full-wave simulation before the model is introduced, so the central claim does not reduce to the fit. Hence a moderate partial-circularity score of 4 is appropriate. No load-bearing self-citation or imported uniqueness theorem is present; reference [20] is a prior self-citation but is used only as background for all-dielectric EIT and does not carry the derivation.

Assumptions & free parameters 3 free parameters · 4 assumptions · 0 invented entities

The central claim depends on the numerical simulation, the toroidal dipole identification, and a fitted two-oscillator model. No new physical entities are introduced.

free parameters (3)
  • coupling coefficient k (two-particle model) = 45 THz to 16.5 THz
    Fitted to match the simulated transmission spectra for spacer thickness t from 300 nm to 900 nm.
  • damping rates gamma1, gamma2 = not stated
    Free parameters of the two-particle model fitted to the simulated EIT line shapes.
  • mass ratio B and coupling strength ratio A, proportionality K = not stated
    Additional free parameters in Eq. (3) used to fit 1-Im[chi_eff] to the simulated spectra.
assumptions (4)
  • domain assumption CST frequency-domain simulations accurately solve Maxwell's equations for the periodic structure
    The entire central claim rests on the numerical solver's accuracy; no convergence study is provided.
  • domain assumption The silicon rod's sharp resonance is dominated by a toroidal dipole moment
    Multipole decomposition of the single rod array shows dominant toroidal dipole, but the decomposition is based on induced currents in a single simulation and may not uniquely identify the mode.
  • ad hoc to paper The two-particle oscillator model (Eqs. 1-3) captures the coupling between the two bright modes
    The model is introduced and fitted to the simulated spectra; its parameters have no independent microscopic derivation.
  • domain assumption Drude model for silver with omega_pl=1.37e16 s-1 and omega_c=8.5e13 s-1 from reference [40] is valid in the near-infrared
    Material model taken from prior literature, not verified in this paper.

how reviews work

0 comments
Cite this review

Pith. "Pith review of Analogue of electromagnetically induced transparency with high Q factor in Metal-dielectric metamaterials." pith.science (2026). https://pith.science/paper/VQABKPRP

@misc{pith2026190808632,
  author       = {Pith},
  title        = {Pith review of: Analogue of electromagnetically induced transparency with high Q factor in Metal-dielectric metamaterials},
  year         = {2026},
  howpublished = {\url{https://pith.science/paper/VQABKPRP}},
  note         = {Machine review of arXiv:1908.08632}
}
read the original abstract

We investigated numerically the electromagnetically induced transparency (EIT) behavior with the maximum Q factor is up to 28000 in a metal-dielectric metamaterial. It composed of two layers, a metallic strip as bright mode stacked above a dielectric rod as another bright mode. The coherent coupling between the broad electric dipole induced by the metal strip and the narrow toroidal dipole induced by the dielectric rod leads to the destructive interference, then introduces a transparency window. Interestingly, the EIT window could be effectively influenced by varying parameters of the two layers and the thickness of middle spacer. This process can be explained by using two-particle model. Furthermore, the radiation loss is greatly suppressed within the EIT windows and the slow light effect is improved a lot. These excellent properties also provide an effective platform for the filters and sensitive chemical and biological sensors in the optical range.

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

27 extracted references · 27 canonical work pages

  1. [3]

    Low-loss metamaterials based on classical electromagneticallyinducedtransparency,

    P. Tassin, L. Zhang, T. Koschny, E. N. Economou, and C. M. Soukoulis, “Low-loss metamaterials based on classical electromagneticallyinducedtransparency,” Phys.Rev.Lett.102,053901(2009). [4]S.Zhang,D.A.Genov,Y.Wang,M.Liu,andX.Zhang, “Plasmon-inducedtransparencyinmetamaterials,”Phys.Rev. Lett.101,047401(2008)

  2. [5]

    Coupling between a dark and a bright eigenmode in a terahertz metamaterial,

    R. Singh, C. Rockstuhl, F. Lederer, and W. Zhang, “Coupling between a dark and a bright eigenmode in a terahertz metamaterial,” Phys.Rev.B79,085111(2009)

  3. [6]

    Active manipulation of plasmonic electromagnetically-induced transparencybasedonmagneticplasmonresonance,

    Y. Lu, J. Y. Rhee, W. H. Jang, and Y. P. Lee, “Active manipulation of plasmonic electromagnetically-induced transparencybasedonmagneticplasmonresonance,” Opt.Express18,20912(2010)

  4. [7]

    Planar designs for electromagnetically inducedtransparencyinmetamaterials,

    P. Tassin, L. Zhang, T. Koschny, E. N. Economou, and C. M. Soukoulis, “Planar designs for electromagnetically inducedtransparencyinmetamaterials,” Opt.Express17,5595(2009)

  5. [8]

    Enhanced sensing performance by the plasmonicanalogofelectromagneticallyinducedtransparencyinactivemetamaterials,

    Z. G. Dong, H. Liu, J. X. Cao,T. Li, S. -M.Wang, S. -N Zhu, and X. Zhang, “Enhanced sensing performance by the plasmonicanalogofelectromagneticallyinducedtransparencyinactivemetamaterials,” Appl.Phys.Lett.97,114101(2010). [9]Z.Vafapour,H.Alaei, “AchievingaHighQ-FactorandTunableSlow-LightviaClassicalElectromagneticallyInduced Transparency(Cl-EIT)inMetamate...

  6. [11]

    Electromagnetically induced transparency control in terahertz metasurfacesbasedonbright-brightmodecoupling,

    R. Yahiaoui, J. A. Burrow, S. M. Mekonen, et. “Electromagnetically induced transparency control in terahertz metasurfacesbasedonbright-brightmodecoupling,”Phys.Rev.B97,155403(2017)

  7. [12]

    Analogue of electromagnetically induced transparency in a terahertzmetamaterial,

    Sher-Yi Chiam, Ranjan Singh, Carsten Rockstuhl,et. “Analogue of electromagnetically induced transparency in a terahertzmetamaterial,” Phys.Rev.B80,153103(2009)

  8. [13]

    Asymmetric coupling between subradiant and superradiantplasmonic resonancesanditsenhancedsensingperformance,

    C.Y.Chen, I.W. Un, N.-H. Tai, and T.-J.Yen, “Asymmetric coupling between subradiant and superradiantplasmonic resonancesanditsenhancedsensingperformance,” Opt.Express17,15372(2009)

Show all 27 references
  1. [14]

    Manipulating the plasmon-induced transparencyinterahertzmetamaterials,

    Z. Li, Y. Ma, R. Huang, R. Singh, J. Gu, Z. Tian, J. Han, and W. Zhang, “Manipulating the plasmon-induced transparencyinterahertzmetamaterials,” Opt.Express19,8912(2011)

  2. [15]

    Magnetically coupled electromagnetically induced transparency analogy of dielectricmetamaterial

    F. Zhang , Q. Zhao, C. Lan, et al. “Magnetically coupled electromagnetically induced transparency analogy of dielectricmetamaterial.” Appl.Phys.Lett.104(13),36(2014). [16]C.K.Chen,Y.C.Lai,Y.H.Yang,C.Y.Chen,T.J.Yen,“Inducingtransparencywithlargemagneticresponseandgroup indicesb...

  3. [17]

    All-dielectric metasurface analogue of electromagnetically inducedtransparency,

    Y. M. Yang, Kravchenko, D. P. Briggs, and J. Valentine, "All-dielectric metasurface analogue of electromagnetically inducedtransparency,"Nat.Commun.5,5753(2014)

  4. [18]

    Electromagnetically induced transparency-like optical responses in all-dielectricmetamaterials,

    J. Zhang, W. Liu, X. Yuan, and S. Qin, “Electromagnetically induced transparency-like optical responses in all-dielectricmetamaterials,” J.Opt.,16(12), 125102(2014)

  5. [19]

    All-optical tuning of EIT-like dielectric metasurfaces by means of chalcogenide phase changematerials,

    E. Petronijevic, C. Sibilia, " All-optical tuning of EIT-like dielectric metasurfaces by means of chalcogenide phase changematerials,"Opt.Express24(26),30411–30420(2016). [20]B.X.Han,X.J.Li,C.S.Sui,J.Y.Diao,X.F.JingandZ.Hong,“Analogofelectromagneticallyinducedtransparency inan...

  6. [21]

    Electromagnetically induced transparency in all-dielectric metamaterial-waveguide system

    P. Ding, J. He , J. Wang , et al. “Electromagnetically induced transparency in all-dielectric metamaterial-waveguide system.” App.Opt.54(12),3708(2015)

  7. [22]

    Electromagnetically induced transparency with wide band inall-dielectric microstructure based on Mieresonances

    L. Zhu, D. Liang . "Electromagnetically induced transparency with wide band inall-dielectric microstructure based on Mieresonances."J.Opt.16,125105(2014)

  8. [23]

    The Fano resonanceinplasmonicnanostructuresandmetamaterials,

    B. L. Yanchuk, N. I. Zheludev, S. A. Maier, N. J. Halas, P. Nordlander, H. Giessen, and C. T. Chong, "The Fano resonanceinplasmonicnanostructuresandmetamaterials,"Nat.Mater.9(9),707-715(2010)

  9. [24]

    Plasmonic analogue of electromagneticallyinducedtransparencyattheDrudedampinglimit,

    N. Liu, L. Langguth, T. Weiss, J. Kästel, M. Fleischhauer, T. Pfau, and H. Giessen, “Plasmonic analogue of electromagneticallyinducedtransparencyattheDrudedampinglimit,” Nat.Mater.8,758(2009)

  10. [25]

    Dielectricmetamaterialswithtoroidaldipolarresponse,

    A. A. Basharin, M. Kafesaki, E. N. Economou, C. M. Soukoulis, V. A. Fedotov, V. Savinov, and N. I. Zheludev,"Dielectricmetamaterialswithtoroidaldipolarresponse,"Phys.Rev.X5,011036(2015). [26]E.E.RadescuandG.Vaman,"Exactcalculationoftheangularmomentumloss,recoilforce, andradiat...

  11. [28]

    Toroidal dipolar response in a metamaterial,

    T. Kaelberer, V. A. Fedotov, N. Papasimakis, D. P. Tsai, and N. I. Zheludev, "Toroidal dipolar response in a metamaterial,"Science330(6010),1510(2010)

  12. [29]

    Low-loss and high-Q planar metamaterial with toroidal moment,

    Y. Fan, Z. Wei, H. Li, H. Chen, and C. M. Soukoulis, "Low-loss and high-Q planar metamaterial with toroidal moment,"Phys.Rev.B87,115417(2013)

  13. [30]

    Sharp toroidalresonancesinplanarterahertzmetasurfaces,

    M. Gupta, V. Savinov, N. Xu, L. Cong, G. Dayal, S. Wang, W. Zhang, N. I. Zheludev, and Ranjan Singh, "Sharp toroidalresonancesinplanarterahertzmetasurfaces,"Adv.Mater.28,8206–8211(2016)

  14. [31]

    Toroidal eigenmodes in all-dielectricmetamolecules,

    A. C. Tasolamprou, O. Tsilipakos, M. Kafesaki, C. M. Soukoulis, and E. N. Economou, "Toroidal eigenmodes in all-dielectricmetamolecules,"Phys.Rev.B94,205433(2016). [32]A. E.Miroshnichenko,A.B.Evlyukhin,Y.F.Yu,R.M.Bakker,A.Chipouline,A.I. Kuznetsov,B.Luk'yanchuk,B.N. Chichkov,a...

  15. [35]

    Ultrahigh-qualityfactorresonantdielectricmetasurfacesbasedonhollownanocuboids,

    J. F. Algorri, D. C. Zografopoulos, A. Ferraro, B. García-Cámara, R. Beccherelli, and J. M. Sánchez-Pena, "Ultrahigh-qualityfactorresonantdielectricmetasurfacesbasedonhollownanocuboids," Opt.Express27(5),6320-6330(2019)

  16. [36]

    Electromagnetically induced transparency and absorption in plasmonic metasurfacesbasedonnear-fieldcoupling

    M. L.Wan, J.N. He, Y. L.Song, F. Q. Zhou, “Electromagnetically induced transparency and absorption in plasmonic metasurfacesbasedonnear-fieldcoupling.” PhysicsLettersA,379,1791-1795(2015)

  17. [37]

    Classical analog of electromagnetically induced absorption in plasmonics

    R. Taubert, M.Hentschel, Jürgen Kstel, H.Giessen. “Classical analog of electromagnetically induced absorption in plasmonics.” NanoLett.12(3),1367-1371(2012). [38]L. Zhu,F.Y.Meng,L. Dong,Q.Wu,B.J.Che, J.Gao,et al. “Magneticmetamaterialanalogofelectromagnetically inducedtranspar...

  18. [39]

    Tunable electromagnetically induced transparency in hybrid graphene/all-dielectricmetamaterial

    L. Zhu, L.Dong, J.Guo, F. Y. Meng, Q.Wu. “ Tunable electromagnetically induced transparency in hybrid graphene/all-dielectricmetamaterial. ”Appl.Phys.A123(3),192(2017)

  19. [40]

    Low-loss negative-index metamaterialattelecommunicationwavelengths

    G. Dolling. Christian, Enkrich ; Martin, Wegener ; Costas M, Soukoulis ; Stefan, Linden “Low-loss negative-index metamaterialattelecommunicationwavelengths”.Opt.Lett.31(12),1800(2006)

Pith tools

Reviewed August 14, 2026 · model on record in the stance chip above.