The reviewed record of science sign in
Pith

arxiv: 2302.07427 · v2 · pith:VQFXNL3R · submitted 2023-02-15 · cs.HC

Studying the effect of AI Code Generators on Supporting Novice Learners in Introductory Programming

Reviewed by Pith T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal T4 kernel pith:VQFXNL3Rrecord.jsonopen to challenge →

classification cs.HC
keywords codexlearnerscodeaccessgeneratorsbettercode-authoringcode-modification
0
0 comments X
read the original abstract

AI code generators like OpenAI Codex have the potential to assist novice programmers by generating code from natural language descriptions, however, over-reliance might negatively impact learning and retention. To explore the implications that AI code generators have on introductory programming, we conducted a controlled experiment with 69 novices (ages 10-17). Learners worked on 45 Python code-authoring tasks, for which half of the learners had access to Codex, each followed by a code-modification task. Our results show that using Codex significantly increased code-authoring performance (1.15x increased completion rate and 1.8x higher scores) while not decreasing performance on manual code-modification tasks. Additionally, learners with access to Codex during the training phase performed slightly better on the evaluation post-tests conducted one week later, although this difference did not reach statistical significance. Of interest, learners with higher Scratch pre-test scores performed significantly better on retention post-tests, if they had prior access to Codex.

This paper has not been read by Pith yet.

discussion (0)

Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.

Forward citations

Cited by 1 Pith paper

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score.

  1. "Should I Give Up Now?" Investigating LLM Pitfalls in Software Engineering

    cs.SE 2024-11 conditional novelty 5.0

    User study reveals nine LLM failure categories in SE tasks and quantifies abandonment factors from 26 participants.