REVIEW 1 cited by
A shorter proof of the path-width theorem
Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.
This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.
SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event
T0 review · schema-true
One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.
pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp
abstract
A graph has {\em path-width} at most $w$ if it can be built from a sequence of graphs each with at most $w+1$ vertices, by overlapping consecutive terms. Every graph with path-width at least $w-1$ contains every $w$-vertex forest as a minor: this was originally proved by Bienstock, Robertson, Thomas and the author, and was given a short proof by Diestel. Here we give a proof even shorter and simpler than that of Diestel.
Forward citations
Cited by 1 Pith paper
-
Treewidth of Products of Graphs with High Treewidth
The treewidth of the strong product of two graphs is at least the product of their treewidth-plus-ones, minus one; analogous bounds hold for pathwidth and Cartesian products.
Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.