Pith. sign in

REVIEW 3 major objections 5 minor 45 references

Transmissive RIS Transceiver-Empowered ISAC Systems: Energy Efficiency Optimization for Perfect and Imperfect CSI

T0 review · 3 major / 5 minor · reviewed 2026-08-01 · deepseek-v4-flash

Challenge this review Re-run · record.json Download PDF Read on arXiv ↗

Pith's one-line read This paper designs beamforming for a transmissive-RIS transceiver so that one integrated sensing and communication system can maximize energy efficiency while guaranteeing user rates and target sensing, under both perfect and imperfect chan

desk verdict Competent optimization, but Eq. (1) models a fully digital array and charges one RF chain, so the claimed TRIS EE gains are not realizable. read the letter →

arxiv 2607.17475 v1 pith:VS6ZULRB submitted 2026-07-20 eess.SP

Yuan Guo , Wen Chen , Yang Liu , Kunlun Wang , Zhendong Li , Qiong Wu This is my paper
classification eess.SP
keywords transmissiveRIStransceiverintegratedsensingandcommunicationenergyefficiencyoptimizationtransmitbeamformingrobustimperfectCSImajorization-minimizationS-Procedure
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal

The pith

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The reading

The paper studies an integrated sensing and communication (ISAC) downlink system built around a transmissive reconfigurable intelligent surface (TRIS) transceiver, which uses a single feed antenna and one RF chain to shape transmitted signals. It tries to prove that the transmit beamformers can be optimized to maximize energy efficiency while enforcing a minimum rate per user, a minimum beampattern gain toward a sensing target, and a per-antenna power limit. For perfect channel state information, the authors propose an iterative algorithm based on fractional programming and majorization-minimization that they claim converges monotonically and always returns a feasible solution. For imperfect channel state information, they use the S-Procedure to turn semi-infinite robust constraints into linear matrix inequalities and develop a second MM-based algorithm. If the claims hold, a TRIS transceiver can deliver higher energy efficiency than a conventional fully active multi-antenna base station because it needs only one RF chain.

What carries the argument

The load-bearing mechanism is a reformulation chain: fractional programming transforms the logarithmic rate into a quadratic surrogate with auxiliary variables, then majorization-minimization linearizes the non-convex fractional objective and non-convex rate and beampattern constraints. For robustness, the S-Procedure converts bounded-norm channel uncertainties into finite-dimensional LMIs. The key modeling object is the TRIS transceiver, where beamforming vectors are arbitrary complex weight vectors subject only to per-antenna power constraints, and total power consumption is modeled as the amplified transmit power plus a static circuit power and one RF-chain power.

What would settle it

Build or simulate a time-modulated TRIS transceiver and try to synthesize an optimized beamforming vector from Algorithm 1 using only the available harmonic weight controls; measure the achieved per-user SINR, target beampattern gain, and total consumed power and compare to the predicted values. A significant shortfall would falsify the claim that the optimized beamformers are realizable under the stated per-antenna power model.

Watch

Extended reading notes

Core claim

The central claim is that the energy-efficiency maximization problem for a TRIS transceiver-enabled ISAC system can be reformulated and solved by iterative algorithms in both perfect and imperfect CSI settings. In the perfect CSI case, the rate functions are recast through Lagrangian dual and quadratic transforms, then the non-convex fractional objective and constraints are convexified using MM-based surrogate functions; Algorithm 1 is claimed to guarantee a feasible solution and monotonic increase of the objective. In the imperfect CSI case, the worst-case semi-infinite constraints are converted into LMIs via the S-Procedure, slack variables and further MM surrogates are introduced, and Alg

Load-bearing premise

The central assumption is that the TRIS transceiver can realize any complex optimized beamforming vector subject only to per-antenna power limits; if the time-modulated array hardware imposes additional constraints (phase quantization, harmonic control, coupling), the computed EE and the comparison to a conventional base station may not hold.

Editorial extensions

If this is right

  • If the algorithms converge as claimed, TRIS transceivers can be used as energy-efficient ISAC transmitters while enforcing per-user rate guarantees and sensing gain constraints.
  • The single-RF-chain architecture would make TRIS transceivers attractive for power-constrained 6G deployments, yielding higher EE than conventional fully active arrays under the same per-antenna power budget.
  • The robust formulation provides worst-case EE guarantees when channel estimation errors are bounded, making the design applicable to practical imperfect-CSI scenarios.
  • Larger TRIS sizes (more unit cells) improve EE due to extra beamforming degrees of freedom, suggesting a favorable scaling path for the architecture.
  • The proposed framework extends to other TRIS-enabled applications needing simultaneous communication and sensing with power budgets.

Reading between the lines

Editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • The paper's modeling of TRIS beamformers as arbitrary complex vectors likely idealizes real time-modulated arrays; actual harmonic constraints, unit-cell phase/amplitude limits, and mutual coupling may restrict the achievable weights, so the reported EE gains should be tested against a hardware-accurate TRIS model.
  • The EE advantage over a conventional base station depends on the power model that assigns circuit power to N RF chains for the conventional array; a power model that accounts for TRIS controller and switching overhead could narrow the gap.
  • A natural testable extension is to incorporate TMA harmonic spectral constraints into the optimization, converting the beamforming variables into limited sets of Fourier weights and measuring the resulting EE loss.
  • The robust design could be extended to angular uncertainty in target direction directly, rather than bounding the channel vector error, which may yield tighter robust sensing beampattern guarantees.
Share X Bluesky LinkedIn Reddit HN

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, and a circularity audit.

Referee Report

3 major / 5 minor

Summary. The paper considers a downlink ISAC system in which a single-feed, time-modulated-array (TMA) transmissive RIS (TRIS) transceiver serves K single-antenna users and senses a point target. It formulates two energy-efficiency (EE) maximization problems, (P0) under perfect CSI and (P1) under bounded-norm imperfect CSI, with per-user rate constraints, a beampattern-gain constraint on the sensing target, and per-antenna power constraints. For the perfect-CSI case, the authors use fractional programming (FP) and majorization-minimization (MM) to obtain convex subproblems and state a monotonic-convergence theorem (Theorem 1). For the imperfect-CSI case, they use the S-Procedure and a sign-definiteness lemma to convert semi-infinite constraints into LMIs and propose an MM-based algorithm (Algorithm 2), whose convergence proof is explicitly omitted. Numerical experiments report convergence and claim EE gains over a conventional N-RF-chain base station.

Significance. If the system model were physically realizable, the paper would be a useful contribution to ISAC optimization: the perfect-CSI algorithm has a written convergence proof, all subproblems are convex, complexity estimates are provided, and the robust reformulation uses standard tools. However, the central premise — that a single-feed TMA TRIS can transmit K+N independent spatial streams with arbitrary beamforming vectors while consuming only one RF chain — is not justified and is contradicted by the architecture described in the Introduction. The reported EE values in Figs. 4 and 8 and the claimed advantage over the conventional base station are therefore not shown to be attainable on the modeled hardware. The algorithmic machinery may be of independent interest for an abstract per-antenna-constrained multi-antenna transceiver, but it does not establish the paper's TRIS-specific claims.

major comments (3)
  1. [Section II-A, Eqs. (1)-(4)] The transmitted signal in Eq. (1) is modeled as K independent communication streams and N independent radar streams, each with an arbitrary beamforming vector w_c,k or w_r,n, subject only to the per-antenna power constraints in (2). This is a full-DoF, multi-stream array model. The TRIS architecture described in the Introduction, however, has a single horn-feed antenna illuminating passive TMA unit cells. With a single feed, the spatial transmit vector is a common feed waveform multiplied element-wise by the unit-cell transmission coefficients; at each TMA harmonic the spatial vector is rank-one and the coefficients are coupled in amplitude and phase by the duty cycle. Realizing the K+N streams of Eq. (1) would require K+N RF chains or equivalent baseband controls, not the single RF chain used in the power model (13). Thus the feasible sets of (P0) and (P1) are strict supersets of physic
  2. [Section IV-B1] The convergence analysis for Algorithm 2 is omitted with the statement that it 'follows that for (P0).' This is not a cosmetic gap. The imperfect-CSI algorithm introduces additional slack variables μ, ν, the S-Procedure multipliers, and the MM linearization of log(ν_k). The feasibility and monotonicity of this more complex iteration — especially the possible interaction between the upper-bounding tangent for log(ν_k), the conservative robust constraints, and the fractional objective — are not immediate consequences of Theorem 1. Since the paper claims the same convergence behavior for Algorithm 2, a proof or a precise statement of what is guaranteed is required.
  3. [Section V] The numerical section does not specify several parameters on which the central EE comparison depends: P_c,TRIS (and its components P_s,TRIS and P_RF), ξ_TRIS, the rate threshold R_th, the beampattern threshold P_r, the uncertainty radii ξ_c,k and ξ_r, and the power-consumption model of the 'Tra. BS' benchmark. No carrier frequency, bandwidth, or number of random channel realizations is reported, and the figures contain no error bars or confidence intervals. Because the claimed EE advantage is driven largely by the difference between one RF chain and N RF chains, omitting these values makes the quantitative results non-reproducible and weakens the validation of the central claim.
minor comments (5)
  1. [Theorem 1] The theorem statement says the objective value of problem (P5) increases monotonically, but the proof shows monotonic increase of the original EE objective through the surrogate bounds. The statement should be reworded to match the proof.
  2. [Appendix B, Eq. (61)] After the MM lower bound, the paper notes that (60) is a conservative sufficient condition for (35c), but the subsequent S-Procedure step is written with '⇒'. Clarify that the LMI condition is sufficient (and equivalent to the lower-bound condition) rather than equivalent to the original constraint.
  3. [Fig. 5] The x-axis is labeled 'Maximum distance' and the text varies it from 50 to 200 m, but the system setup in Section V states user distances are 'randomly generated within a sector region with distances ranging from 20 to 50 m.' Clarify how the maximum-distance experiment is generated.
  4. [Algorithm 2] The initialization includes ν(0) but not μ(0); for reproducibility specify initializations for all blocks, including the multipliers.
  5. [References] The heavy reliance on the authors' own prior TRIS papers ([12], [14]–[18], [22]–[23]) is acceptable, but the statement in footnote 1 should cite a source that actually establishes the full-DoF signal model for a TRIS transceiver, or justify it from first principles.

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged · score 0.0 of 10

No significant circularity: the FP/MM/S-Procedure derivations are self-contained, and self-citations are contextual rather than load-bearing.

full rationale

The paper's central derivation chain takes a system model (Eqs. (1)-(13)) and solves the resulting EE maximization problems (P0)/(P1) via standard FP transformations (Eqs. (18)-(19)), MM convexification (Eqs. (27)-(30), (43)-(45)), and S-Procedure/LMI recasting (Lemmas 1-2, Eqs. (38)-(42), Appendices B-D). None of these steps fits parameters to data or defines an output in terms of an input: the rate reformulations are algebraic equivalences/surrogates, the MM bounds are constructed from the previous iterate, and the robust constraints are transformed by external lemmas with cited sources [30], [44]. The convergence claim (Theorem 1) is a standard MM monotonicity argument, and even if its proof has gaps, those would be correctness issues, not circularity. The many self-citations ([12], [14]-[18], [32]) supply the TRIS architecture, prior TRIS optimization examples, and channel-estimation methods; they are used as context and modeling precedent, not as the proof of the EE-optimality or convergence of Algorithms 1-2. No 'prediction' is made from fitted data, and no uniqueness theorem is imported from the authors' prior work. Section IV-B1 explicitly omits the convergence proof for Algorithm 2, but that is a proof omission rather than a circular step. The concern that Eq. (1) may overstate the physical degrees of freedom of a single-feed time-modulated TRIS is a model-validity claim, not a circular derivation, so it does not affect the circularity score.

Assumptions & free parameters 0 free parameters · 6 assumptions · 0 invented entities

No parameter fitting or prediction appears in the paper; all constants such as Punit, Rth, Pr, C0, alpha, kappa, xi_TRIS and Pc,TRIS are modeling inputs chosen for simulation, not fitted to reproduce a claimed outcome. Auxiliary variables (gamma, omega, x, y, mu, nu, multipliers) are optimization variables, not free parameters. No new physical entities are introduced; the TRIS transceiver is taken from prior work [12].

assumptions (6)
  • domain assumption The TRIS transceiver beamforming vectors are arbitrary complex vectors subject only to per-antenna power constraints (2).
    Sec. II-A, Eqs. (1)-(4) and footnote 1; this is the main hardware premise and is taken from prior TRIS work [12]-[13] without independent validation here.
  • domain assumption Rician fading for user channels (5)-(6) and LoS sensing channel (10).
    Used to define SINR and beampattern; standard for indoor/short-range mmWave links but not validated by measurements.
  • domain assumption Bounded CSI error model (14)-(15) with known uncertainty radii xi_c,k and xi_r.
    Worst-case robust guarantees hold only if the error balls indeed contain the true channels; radii are assumed known.
  • domain assumption Power consumption model (13): P_TRIS = xi_TRIS * radiated power + P_s,TRIS + P_RF.
    The EE advantage over the N-RF-chain baseline is driven by this model (single RF chain); different circuit-power assumptions change the claimed gains.
  • standard math FP reformulation and MM lower bounds are valid (Shen-Yu [27], Sun et al. [29]).
    Used in Eqs. (18)-(19), (27)-(30); standard results in the cited literature.
  • standard math S-Procedure (Lemma 1) and sign-definiteness lemma (Lemma 2) are applicable to the transformed quadratics.
    Used to convert semi-infinite constraints to LMIs in Sec. IV; standard lemmas with stated conditions.

how reviews work

0 comments
Cite this review

Pith. "Pith review of Transmissive RIS Transceiver-Empowered ISAC Systems: Energy Efficiency Optimization for Perfect and Imperfect CSI." pith.science (2026). https://pith.science/paper/VS6ZULRB

@misc{pith2026260717475,
  author       = {Pith},
  title        = {Pith review of: Transmissive RIS Transceiver-Empowered ISAC Systems: Energy Efficiency Optimization for Perfect and Imperfect CSI},
  year         = {2026},
  howpublished = {\url{https://pith.science/paper/VS6ZULRB}},
  note         = {Machine review of arXiv:2607.17475}
}
read the original abstract

In this paper, a novel transmissive reconfigurable intelligent surface (TRIS) transceiver is employed to enable an integrated sensing and communication (ISAC) system supporting both communication and sensing. Under both perfect and imperfect channel state information (CSI), we study the transmit beamforming design for the TRIS transceiver to maximize the system energy efficiency (EE), subject to per-user minimum-rate guarantees, a minimum beampattern gain toward the sensing target, and per-antenna power constraints. The corresponding EE maximization problems are challenging to solve due to the fractional objective and non-convex constraints. In particular, under imperfect CSI, the resulting semi-infinite constraints further complicate the problem. For the perfect CSI case, we first apply the fractional programming (FP) methodology to obtain more tractable reformulations of the rate functions, and then propose an iterative algorithm based on the majorization-minimization (MM) framework. For the imperfect CSI case, we utilize the S-Procedure to transform the semi-infinite inequality constraints into linear matrix inequalities (LMIs), and further develop an efficient MM-based algorithm with the aid of slack variables. Numerical results demonstrate the convergence and effectiveness of the proposed algorithms and validate the EE gains of the TRIS transceiver-enabled ISAC system.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2607.17475 by the authors.

Figure 1
Figure 1. A TRIS transceiver-enabled ISAC system. majorization-minimization (MM) method [29], an efficient iterative algorithm is obtained that guarantees a feasible solution and monotonic convergence of the objective value. • Furthermore, under imperfect CSI, the channel uncertainty induced by the bounded channel error model significantly increases the difficulty of the EE maximization problem compared with the perfect CSI c… view at source ↗
Figure 2
Figure 2. The considered simulation scenario. Obviously, both the objective and the constraints of problem (P8) have been convexified. Therefore, (P8) is convex and can be solved by using CVX. B. Convergence and Complexity Analyses 1) Convergence Analysis: Since the solution to (P1) employs optimization techniques similar to those used for (P0), the convergence analysis is omitted here for brevity and follows that for (P0). 2… view at source ↗
Figure 3
Figure 3. Convergence of Algorithm 1. 5 10 15 20 25 30 Maximum power of each unit (mW) 0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 1 1.2 1.4 1.6 1.8 2 EE (nats/Joule/Hz) TRIS, N=4 TRIS, N=8 TRIS, N=12 Tra. BS, N=4 Tra. BS, N=8 Tra. BS, N=12 [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p020_3.png] view at source ↗
Figures from the paper (3 more)
Figure 5
Figure 5. Figure 5: EE versus the maximum distance between TRIS transceiver and users. 2.8 2.9 3 3.1 3.2 3.3 3.4 3.5 3.6 3.7 3.8 The path loss exponent 0 1 2 3 EE (nats/Joule/Hz) K=2 N=4 N=8 N=12 N=16 2.8 2.9 3 3.1 3.2 3.3 3.4 3.5 3.6 3.7 3.8 The path loss exponent 0 1 2 3 4 EE (nats/Joul…
Figure 7
Figure 7. Figure 7: Convergence of Algorithm 2. 5 10 15 20 25 30 Maximum power of each unit (mW) 0 0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 1 1.2 EE (nats/Joule/Hz) TRIS, N=4 TRIS, N=6 TRIS, N=8 Tra. BS, N=4 Tra. BS, N=6 Tra. BS, N=8 [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p022_7.png]
Figure 9
Figure 9. Figure 9: EE versus the maximum distance between TRIS transceiver and users. 0 0.01 0.02 0.03 0.04 0.05 Channel uncertainty level 0.3 0.4 0.5 0.6 0.7 0.8 0.9 EE (nats/Joule/Hz) K=2, N=4 K=2, N=8 K=4, N=4 K=4, N=8 [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p023_9.png]

Discussion (0). Sign in to comment.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

45 extracted references · 1 canonical work pages

  1. [1]

    The ITU vision a nd framework for 6G: Scenarios, capabilities, and enablers ,

    R. Liu, L. Zhang, Y . R. Li, and M. D. Renzo, “The ITU vision a nd framework for 6G: Scenarios, capabilities, and enablers ,” IEEE V eh. Technol. Mag., vol. 20, no. 2, pp. 114 −122, Jun. 2025

    2025

  2. [2]

    Integrated sensing and communications: Toward dual-fun ctional wireless networks for 6G and beyond,

    F. Liu et al. , “Integrated sensing and communications: Toward dual-fun ctional wireless networks for 6G and beyond,” IEEE J. Sel. Areas Commun. , vol. 40, no. 6, pp. 1728 −1767, Jun. 2022

    2022

  3. [3]

    Intell igent omni-surfaces assisted integrated multi-target sen sing and multi-user MIMO communications,

    Z. Zhang, W. Chen, Q. Wu, Z. Li, X. Zhu, and J. Y uan, “Intell igent omni-surfaces assisted integrated multi-target sen sing and multi-user MIMO communications,” IEEE Trans. Commun. , vol. 72, no. 8, pp. 4591 −4606, Aug. 2024

    2024

  4. [4]

    Movable antenna enhanced networked integrated sensing a nd communication system,

    Y . Guo et al., “Movable antenna enhanced networked integrated sensing a nd communication system,” IEEE Trans. Wireless Commun., vol. 25, pp. 5555 −5572, 2026

    2026

  5. [5]

    Cram´ er-Rao boun d optimization for fluid antenna-empowered integrated sensing and uplink communication system,

    Y . Guo, W. Chen, Q. Wu, Y . Liu, and Q. Wu, “Cram´ er-Rao boun d optimization for fluid antenna-empowered integrated sensing and uplink communication system,” IEEE Trans. Commun. , vol. 74, pp. 3631 −3645, 2026

    2026

  6. [6]

    Intelligent surfaces empowered wireless network: Recen t advances and the road to 6G,

    Q. Wu et al. , “Intelligent surfaces empowered wireless network: Recen t advances and the road to 6G,” Proc. IEEE , vol. 112, no. 7, pp. 724 −763, Jul. 2024

    2024

  7. [7]

    Intellige nt reflecting surface-aided wireless communications: A tutorial,

    Q. Wu, S. Zhang, B. Zheng, C. Y ou, and R. Zhang, “Intellige nt reflecting surface-aided wireless communications: A tutorial,” IEEE Trans. Commun. , vol. 69, no. 5, pp. 3313 −3351, May 2021

    2021

  8. [8]

    Enhanced secure communication via novel double-faced active RIS,

    Y . Guo, Y . Liu, Q. Wu, Q. Shi, and Y . Zhao, “Enhanced secure communication via novel double-faced active RIS,” IEEE Trans. Commun., vol. 71, no. 6, pp. 3497 −3512, Jun. 2023

    2023

Show all 45 references
  1. [9]

    Joint beamforming and power allocation for RIS aided full-duplex integrated sensing and uplink communication system,

    Y . Guo, Y . Liu, Q. Wu, X. Li, and Q. Shi, “Joint beamforming and power allocation for RIS aided full-duplex integrated sensing and uplink communication system,” IEEE Trans. Wireless Commun. , vol. 23, no. 5, pp. 4627 −4642, May 2024

    2024

  2. [10]

    Communica tion aided sensing for RIS assisted MU-MIMO system: CRB optimization with guaranteed ergodic rate,

    Z. Guang, Y . Liu, Q. Wu, Y . -F. Liu, and Q. Shi, “Communica tion aided sensing for RIS assisted MU-MIMO system: CRB optimization with guaranteed ergodic rate,” IEEE Trans. Signal Process. , vol. 73, pp. 4208 −4225, 2025

    2025

  3. [11]

    Intelligent reflecting surfaces for integrated sensing a nd communications: A survey,

    Q. Wu et al. , “Intelligent reflecting surfaces for integrated sensing a nd communications: A survey,” Nov. 2025. [Online]. Available: https://arxiv.org/abs/2511.10990

    2025 arXiv

  4. [12]

    Transmissive reconfigurable intelligent surface-enabl ed transceiver systems: Architecture, design issues, and opportunities,

    Z. Li et al. , “Transmissive reconfigurable intelligent surface-enabl ed transceiver systems: Architecture, design issues, and opportunities,” IEEE V eh. Technol. Mag., vol. 19, no. 4, pp. 44 −53, Dec. 2024

    2024

  5. [13]

    MIMO transmission through reconfigurable intelligent su rface: System design, analysis, and implementa- tion,

    W. Tang et al. , “MIMO transmission through reconfigurable intelligent su rface: System design, analysis, and implementa- tion,” IEEE J. Sel. Areas Commun. , vol. 38, no. 11, pp. 2683 −2699, Nov. 2020

    2020

  6. [14]

    Toward TMA-based transmissive RIS transceiver enabled d ownlink communication networks: A consensus- ADMM approach,

    Z. Li et al. , “Toward TMA-based transmissive RIS transceiver enabled d ownlink communication networks: A consensus- ADMM approach,” IEEE Trans. Commun. , vol. 73, no. 4, pp. 2832 −2846, Apr. 2025

    2025

  7. [15]

    Beamfor ming for transmissive RIS transceiver enabled simultaneou s wireless information and power transfer systems,

    Y . Guo, W. Chen, Y . Zhu, Z. Li, Q. Wu, and K. Wang, “Beamfor ming for transmissive RIS transceiver enabled simultaneou s wireless information and power transfer systems,” Nov. 202 5. [Online]. Available: https://arxiv.org/abs/2511.119 85

  8. [16]

    Resource alloca tion for transmissive RIS transceiver-enabled SWIPT systems,

    Y . Guo, W. Chen, X. Bai, C. He, and Q. Wu, “Resource alloca tion for transmissive RIS transceiver-enabled SWIPT systems,” IEEE Trans. V eh. Technol., early access, June 04, 2026, doi: 10.1109/TVT.2026.37001 00

    2026

  9. [17]

    Robust s um-rate maximization in transmissive RMS transceiver- enabled SWIPT networks,

    Z. Li, W. Chen, Z. Zhang, Q. Wu, H. Cao, and J. Li, “Robust s um-rate maximization in transmissive RMS transceiver- enabled SWIPT networks,” IEEE Internet Things J. , vol. 10, no. 8, pp. 7259 −7271, Apr. 2023

    2023

  10. [18]

    Joint communic ation and computation design in transmissive RMS transceiv er enabled multi-tier computing networks,

    Z. Li, W. Chen, Z. Liu, H. Tang, and J. Lu, “Joint communic ation and computation design in transmissive RMS transceiv er enabled multi-tier computing networks,” IEEE J. Sel. Areas Commun. , vol. 41, no. 2, pp. 334 −348, Feb. 2023

    2023

  11. [19]

    Hybrid active-passi ve RIS transmitter enabled energy-efficient multi-user communications,

    A. Huang, X. Mu, L. Guo, and G. Zhu, “Hybrid active-passi ve RIS transmitter enabled energy-efficient multi-user communications,” IEEE Trans. Wireless Commun. , vol. 23, no. 9, pp. 10653 −10666, Sep. 2024

    2024

  12. [20]

    Beamforming design and multi-user scheduling in transmi ssive RIS enabled distributed cooperative ISAC networks with RSMA,

    Z. Liu et al. , “Beamforming design and multi-user scheduling in transmi ssive RIS enabled distributed cooperative ISAC networks with RSMA,” IEEE Trans. Commun. , vol. 73, no. 12, pp. 15247 −15263, Dec. 2025

    2025

  13. [21]

    Joint spatial registra tion and resource allocation for transmissive RIS enabled cooperative ISCC networks,

    Z. Liu, W. Chen, Z. Li, and Q. Wu, “Joint spatial registra tion and resource allocation for transmissive RIS enabled cooperative ISCC networks,” IEEE Trans. Commun. , vol. 74, pp. 7494 −7509, 2026

    2026

  14. [22]

    M ax-min rate optimization for multigroup multicast MISO systems via novel transmissive RIS transceiver,

    Y . Guo, W. Chen, Q. Wu, Y . Zhu, Y . Liu, Z. Li, and Y . Wang, “M ax-min rate optimization for multigroup multicast MISO systems via novel transmissive RIS transceiver,” Jul. 2025 . [Online]. Available: https://arxiv.org/abs/2507.1873 3

    2025

  15. [23]

    Fair rate maximization for multi-user multi-cell MISO co mmunication systems via novel transmissive RIS transceiver,

    Y . Guo et al. , “Fair rate maximization for multi-user multi-cell MISO co mmunication systems via novel transmissive RIS transceiver,” IEEE Trans. V eh. Technol., early access, January 12, 2026, doi: 10.1109/TVT.2026.36 51497

    2026 doi

  16. [24]

    Hardware-e fficient cognitive radar: Multi-target detection with RL-d riven transmissive RIS,

    A. Umra, A. M. Ahmed, S. Roth, and A. Sezgin, “Hardware-e fficient cognitive radar: Multi-target detection with RL-d riven transmissive RIS,” in Proc. IEEE Int. Conf. Acoust., Speech Signal Process. (ICAS SP), Barcelona, Spain, May 2026, pp. 20621−20625

    2026

  17. [25]

    Optimizing movable an tenna position and transmissive RIS phase for efficient base station design,

    M. Boloori, C. Li, and A. Sezgin, “Optimizing movable an tenna position and transmissive RIS phase for efficient base station design,” Nov. 2025. [Online]. Available: https:// arxiv.org/abs/2511.01575

    2025

  18. [26]

    Robust linear beamforming in wireless sensor networks,

    Y . Liu, J. Li, and H. Wang, “Robust linear beamforming in wireless sensor networks,” IEEE Trans. Commun. , vol. 67, no. 6, pp. 4450 −4463, Jun. 2019

    2019

  19. [27]

    Fractional programming for communic ation systems-part I: power control and beamforming,

    K. Shen and W. Y u, “Fractional programming for communic ation systems-part I: power control and beamforming,” IEEE Trans. Signal Process. , vol. 66, no. 10, pp. 2616 −2630, May 2018

    2018

  20. [28]

    Fractional programming for communic ation systems-part II: Uplink scheduling via matching,

    K. Shen and W. Y u, “Fractional programming for communic ation systems-part II: Uplink scheduling via matching,” IEEE Trans. Signal Process. , vol. 66, no. 10, pp. 2631 −2644, May 2018

    2018

  21. [29]

    Majorization-minim ization algorithms in signal processing, communications, and machine learning,

    Y . Sun, P . Babu, and D. P . Palomar, “Majorization-minim ization algorithms in signal processing, communications, and machine learning,” IEEE Trans. Signal Process. , vol. 65, no. 3, pp. 794 −816, Feb. 2017

    2017

  22. [30]

    A competitive minimax approa ch to robust estimation of random parameters,

    Y . C. Eldar and N. Merhav, “A competitive minimax approa ch to robust estimation of random parameters,” IEEE Trans. Signal Process. , vol. 52, no. 7, pp. 1931 −1946, Jul. 2004

    1931

  23. [31]

    Joint transmit beamforming for multiuser MIMO communica tions and MIMO radar,

    X. Liu et al. , “Joint transmit beamforming for multiuser MIMO communica tions and MIMO radar,” IEEE Trans. Signal Process., vol. 68, pp. 3929 −3944, 2020

    2020

  24. [32]

    Transmissive RIS transceiver enabled multistream communication systems: Design, optimization, and analysis,

    Z. Li et al., “Transmissive RIS transceiver enabled multistream communication systems: Design, optimization, and analysis,” IEEE Internet Things J. , vol. 12, no. 5, pp. 5985 −6000, Mar. 2025

    2025

  25. [33]

    Channel estimation for RIS-aided multiuser millimete r-wave systems,

    G. Zhou, C. Pan, H. Ren, P . Popovski, and A. L. Swindlehur st, “Channel estimation for RIS-aided multiuser millimete r-wave systems,” IEEE Trans. Signal Process. , vol. 70, pp. 1478 −1492, Mar. 2022

    2022

  26. [34]

    Joint active and p assive beamforming design for IRS-aided radar- communication,

    M. Hua, Q. Wu, C. He, S. Ma, and W. Chen, “Joint active and p assive beamforming design for IRS-aided radar- communication,” IEEE Trans. Wireless Commun. , vol. 22, no. 4, pp. 2278 −2294, Apr. 2023

    2023

  27. [35]

    Wire less sensing with movable intelligent surface,

    Z. Zheng, Q. Wu, Y . Zhu, W. Chen, Y . Gao, and H. Wang, “Wire less sensing with movable intelligent surface,” IEEE J. Sel. Topics Signal Process. , early access, April 06, 2026, doi: 10.1109/JSTSP .2026.36 81476

    2026 doi

  28. [36]

    Massive M IMO networks: Spectral, energy, and hardware efficiency,

    E. Bj¨ ornson, J. Hoydis, and L. Sanguinetti, “Massive M IMO networks: Spectral, energy, and hardware efficiency,” F oundat. Trends Signal Process. , vol. 11, no. 3 −4, pp. 154 −655, 2017

    2017

  29. [37]

    A fr amework of robust transmission design for IRS-aided MISO communications with imperfect cascaded channels,

    G. Zhou, C. Pan, H. Ren, K. Wang, and A. Nallanathan, “A fr amework of robust transmission design for IRS-aided MISO communications with imperfect cascaded channels,” IEEE Trans. Signal Process. , vol. 68, pp. 5092 −5106, 2020

    2020

  30. [38]

    Rob ust and secure resource allocation for ISAC systems: A novel optimization framework for variable-length snapsh ots,

    D. Xu, X. Y u, D. W. K. Ng, A. Schmeink, and R. Schober, “Rob ust and secure resource allocation for ISAC systems: A novel optimization framework for variable-length snapsh ots,” IEEE Trans. Commun. , vol. 70, no. 12, pp. 8196 −8214, Dec. 2022

    2022

  31. [39]

    Reconfigurable intelligent surface-aided secure integr ated radar and communication systems,

    T. -X. Zheng et al. , “Reconfigurable intelligent surface-aided secure integr ated radar and communication systems,” IEEE Trans. Wireless Commun. , vol. 24, no. 3, pp. 1934 −1948, Mar. 2025

    1934

  32. [40]

    Nonlinear programming,

    D. P . Bertsekas, “Nonlinear programming,” Journal of the Operational Research Society , vol. 48, no. 3, pp. 334 −334, 1997

    1997

  33. [41]

    A flexible design f or active reconfigurable intelligent surface-A sub-array architecture,

    Y . Zhu, Y . Liu, M. Li, Q. Wu, and Q. Shi, “A flexible design f or active reconfigurable intelligent surface-A sub-array architecture,” IEEE Trans. V eh. Technol., vol. 72, no. 10, pp. 12884 −12899, Oct. 2023

    2023

  34. [42]

    Grant and S

    M. Grant and S. Boyd, CVX: Matlab software for disciplined convex programming , version 2.1, http://cvxr.com/cvx, Mar. 2014

    2014

  35. [43]

    Lectures on Modern Conve x Optimization, Analysis, Algorithms, and Engineering Applications

    A. Ben-Tal and A. Nemirovski, “Lectures on Modern Conve x Optimization, Analysis, Algorithms, and Engineering Applications.” Society for Industrial and Applied Mathematics (SIAM) , 2001

    2001

  36. [44]

    A stabilization algorithm for a class o f uncertain linear systems,

    I. R. Petersen, “A stabilization algorithm for a class o f uncertain linear systems,” Syst. Control Lett. , vol. 17, no. 2, pp. 351−357, 1987

    1987

  37. [45]

    Boyd and L

    S. Boyd and L. V andenberghe, Convex Optimization. New Y ork: Cambridge University Press, 2004

    2004

Pith tools

Reviewed August 1, 2026 · model on record in the stance chip above.