Existence, uniqueness, and long-time asymptotic behavior of regular solutions in multidimensional thermoelasticity

Boris Muha; Johannes Lankeit; Mario Fuest; Piotr Micha{\l} Bies; Srdan Trifunovi\'c; Tomasz Cie\'slak

REVIEW 1 major objections 6 minor 1 cited by

Existence, uniqueness, and long-time asymptotic behavior of regular solutions in multidimensional thermoelasticity

T0 review · 1 major / 6 minor · reviewed 2026-08-15 · deepseek-v4-flash

Challenge this review Re-run · record.json Download PDF Read on arXiv ↗ Review JSON

Pith's one-line read For small data on the 2D and 3D torus, the thermoelasticity system has a unique global regular solution, and the temperature converges to a constant while only the divergence-free displacement keeps oscillating.

desk verdict A novel Fisher-information functional and a clean asymptotic picture in 2D/3D thermoelasticity, but the global small-data theorem currently rests on a false Young-type estimate in Lemma 3.6. read the letter →

arxiv 2507.20794 v2 pith:VSQNV2LN submitted 2025-07-28 math.AP

Piotr Micha{l} Bies , Tomasz Cieślak , Mario Fuest , Johannes Lankeit , Boris Muha , Srdan Trifunović This is my paper · ORCID

classification math.AP MSC 74A1574H4035M30

keywords thermoelasticityglobalregularsolutionslocalexistenceFisherinformationlong-timeasymptoticsHelmholtzdecompositiontemperaturestabilizationLaméoperator

verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal

The pith

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The reading

This paper aims to prove that a simplified nonlinear thermoelasticity system on the two- and three-dimensional torus admits unique regular solutions: global in time for sufficiently small initial data and local in time for arbitrary data. The advertised long-time picture is that the temperature stabilizes to a constant determined by the initial energy, while the displacement splits into a divergence-free part that keeps oscillating according to the free wave equation and a curl-free part that decays to zero. The tool is a new Fisher-information functional whose sublevel set is forward invariant for small data, extending a one-dimensional approach to higher dimensions. The paper also states the same existence, uniqueness, and asymptotic results for the Lamé operator.

What carries the argument

The central object is the functional $F(u,\theta)=\frac12\left(\int|\nabla u_t|^2+\int(\Delta u)^2+\int|\nabla\theta|^2/\theta\right)$, where the last term is the Fisher information associated with the temperature. Its time derivative is computed exactly as $-\int\theta|\nabla^2\log\theta|^2\,dx-\frac{\mu}{2}\int(|\nabla\theta|^2/\theta)\operatorname{div} u_t\,dx$, which, together with the vector identity $\Delta w=-\operatorname{curl}\operatorname{curl}w+\nabla\operatorname{div}w$, shows that dissipation acts only through the divergence part. The Helmholtz decomposition then decouples the divergence-free displacement, which obeys the free wave equation, from the coupled curl-free/heat system, and the paper uses the resulting invariant-sublevel estimate $\frac{d}{dt}F\le C\|\nabla^2\theta^{1/2}\|_{L^2}^2(F-D)$ to obtain the small-data global bound.

What would settle it

Directly evaluate the displayed estimate in Lemma 3.6 with $F=1$, $\|A\|=0.01$, $\varepsilon=1$, and $C_2=1$: the claimed bound $C_2F^{1/2}\|A\|\le\varepsilon\|A\|^2+(C_2/\varepsilon)F\|A\|^2$ becomes $0.01\le0.0002$, which is false, so the derivation of the invariant-sublevel estimate lacks support as written. A repaired argument, or a numerical simulation of (1.1) on $\mathbb{T}^2$ with data just below the threshold $D$, would settle whether the global-existence claim holds as stated.

Watch

Extended reading notes

Core claim

The paper claims that on the torus $\mathbb{T}^d$, $d=2,3$, the system $u_{tt}-\Delta u=-\mu\nabla\theta$, $\theta_t-\Delta\theta=-\mu\theta\operatorname{div} u_t$ has a unique global regular solution whenever the initial data satisfy the smallness condition $\|\nabla v_0\|_{L^2}^2+\|\Delta u_0\|_{L^2}^2+\|\nabla\theta_0/\sqrt{\theta_0}\|_{L^2}^2\le D$, and a unique local solution without that condition. For every such global solution, the paper claims the temperature converges in $L^2$ to the constant $\theta_\infty=\frac12\int|\nabla\chi_0|^2+\frac12\int|\tilde\chi_0|^2+\int\theta_0$, the curl-free part $\chi$ of the displacement converges to zero in $H^1$ with $\chi_t\to0$ in $L^2$, while the divergence-free part solves the homogeneous wave equation and does not decay unless it is initially zero. The same conclusions are stated for the Lamé operator.

Load-bearing premise

The small-data global-existence proof depends on Lemma 3.6's inequality $\frac{d}{dt}F\le C\|\nabla^2\theta^{1/2}\|_{L^2}^2(F-D)$, whose derivation from Lemma 3.5 uses a displayed Young-inequality step that is not valid as written; if that step cannot be fixed, the smallness condition (2.4) does not, as written, guarantee a global solution.

Editorial extensions

If this is right

If the main theorem is correct, initial data satisfying (2.4) never lose regularity: the sublevel set $\{F\le D\}$ is forward invariant, so the solution exists for all time.
In any global solution, the divergence-free part of the displacement is a solution of the homogeneous wave equation and therefore does not relax to rest unless its initial projection is zero; persistent oscillations are generic in dimensions 2 and 3.
The temperature necessarily approaches the constant $\theta_\infty$ determined by the initial energy of the curl-free subsystem, and this constant value forces the curl-free part $\chi$ to decay to zero in $H^1$.
The same regularity, uniqueness, and asymptotic statements hold for the Lamé operator with the corresponding energy and functional, so the mechanism is tied to the divergence coupling rather than to the specific form of the elastic operator.
Without the smallness condition, uniqueness and regularity still hold on a maximal time interval, but the method gives no global continuation and permits finite-time breakdown of regularity.

Reading between the lines

Editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

The mechanism suggests a testable numerical signature: on a global solution, the divergence-free Fourier amplitudes of $u$ should oscillate with constant modulus, while the curl-free amplitudes should decay; a direct Helmholtz projection in simulation should reveal this dichotomy.
Because the only dissipation in the system is entropy production $\int|\nabla\log\theta|^2$, the decay of $\chi$ likely has no exponential rate in general; extracting the sharp polynomial rate from the torus spectrum is a natural next step that the paper does not address.
The Fisher-information functional may transfer to other hyperbolic–parabolic systems in which the heat equation couples only through $\operatorname{div} u_t$, provided the analogous invariant-sublevel estimate can be derived.
On bounded domains with boundary conditions, the Helmholtz decomposition still applies, but the wave part feels boundary damping; the paper explicitly leaves that case open, so the oscillating component may decay there.

Share X Bluesky LinkedIn Reddit HN

Signed reviews

No signed human review yet.

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, and a circularity audit.

Desk Editor's Note

read the letter

Worth a look, but not in this form. The paper's real contribution is the Fisher-information functional F and the Helmholtz splitting of the long-time dynamics: temperature goes to a constant, the curl-free part of the displacement decays, and the divergence-free part keeps oscillating. That picture is new for d=2,3 and is argued cleanly once a global solution is known. The construction machinery is also serious: half-Galerkin approximation, uniqueness in the regularity class, Moser-type L∞ bounds for temperature, and the Lamé extension. The dissipation balance (3.3) and the entropy argument in Section 6 are coherent and well referenced. The citation of the 1D papers [5,6] and [16] is honest. The problem is Lemma 3.6. As written, the proof combines Lemma 3.5 with an inequality of the form C2 F^{1/2} A ≤ εA² + (C2/ε) F A², where A = ||∇²√θ||₂. That is not Young's inequality. Young gives εA² + C₂²F/(4ε), with no A² in the second term. The displayed inequality is false: take F=1, A=0.01, ε=1. Since Lemma 3.6 is exactly what yields the invariant ball F≤D (Corollary 3.7), and that ball is what localizes the half-Galerkin solutions globally (Lemma 4.6), the global existence part of Theorem 2.2 is unsupported as written. The long-time theorem inherits the problem. This is a load-bearing flaw, not a typo. Other soft spots are minor: in the same proof, the L4 norm of ∇√θ is silently replaced by the L2 norm of ∇²√θ; this needs an interpolation argument, not Lemma 3.3. The local-in-time argument (Lemma 3.8) looks fine. Bottom line: the paper is repairable in principle. The identity in Lemma 3.2 may support a more delicate differential inequality, and the rest of the architecture is plausible. But as it stands, the central claim of global existence for small data does not follow. I would send it to referees—this is exactly the kind of paper where a referee can identify a fixable gap—but I wouldn't accept it without a corrected Lemma 3.6.

Referee Report

1 major / 6 minor

Summary. The paper studies the simplified nonlinear thermoelasticity system (1.1) on the torus T^d, d=2,3, for displacement u and positive temperature θ. It introduces the Fisher-information-type functional F(u,θ)=1/2(∫|∇u_t|²+∫(Δu)²+∫|∇θ|²/θ), proves the differential identity in Lemma 3.2, and claims an invariant-ball estimate in Lemma 3.6. The main theorems are: global existence and uniqueness for small initial data and local existence for large data (Theorem 2.2); uniform upper and lower temperature bounds (Theorem 2.3); and long-time asymptotics (Theorem 2.4) stating that the curl-free part χ of the displacement satisfies χ(t)→0 in H¹, χ_t(t)→0 in L², θ(t)→θ∞ in L², while the divergence-free part ν solves the free wave equation and persists. Section 7 states analogous results for the Lamé operator. The proof strategy extends the 1D approach of Bies–Cieślak, using the half-Galerkin scheme of Cieślak–Muha–Trifunović, maximal regularity estimates, Moser iteration for temperature bounds, and an omega-limit argument for the asymptotics.

Significance. If the main results are correct, this paper is a significant advance for multidimensional nonlinear thermoelasticity: it removes symmetry restrictions that were previously needed for global regular solutions and gives a precise asymptotic decomposition into an undamped divergence-free wave and a damped curl-free component. The new functional F is natural and elegant, and the paper is largely self-contained, with detailed proofs of the approximation, uniqueness, and regularity parts. Conditional on the key a priori estimate, the arguments are convincing. The Lamé extension is a useful bonus. However, the central small-data global existence hinges entirely on Lemma 3.6, whose proof contains a concrete algebraic error; until that lemma is repaired, the main theorems do not follow as written. Given that the surrounding structure is sound, the gap looks repairable, but it is load-bearing.

major comments (1)

[Section 3, Lemma 3.6 (proof, first displayed inequality after (3.10))] The proof claims dF/dt ≤ −C1 A² + C2 F^{1/2} A ≤ (ε−C1)A² + (C2/ε)F A², with A := ∥∇²θ^{1/2}∥_{L2}. The second inequality is not a consequence of Young's inequality and is false in general: for F=1, A=0.01, ε=1, the left-hand side C2A is of order A, while the right-hand side is of order A². The correct Young estimate is C2F^{1/2}A ≤ εA² + (C2²/(4ε))F, which would produce a term proportional to F and would not yield the claimed invariant-ball inequality dF/dt ≤ C A²(F−D). In addition, the first displayed inequality is not derived from Lemmas 3.5 and 3.3 as stated: Lemma 3.5 contains C2F^{1/2}∥∇θ^{1/2}∥²_{L4}, and the interpolation needed to bound this by C2F^{1/2}A is absent; the natural Gagliardo–Nirenberg plus Poincaré estimate gives ∥∇θ^{1/2}∥²_{L4} ≤ C∥∇²θ^{1/2}∥²_{L2}, i.e., A² rather than A. Since Lemma 3.6 is the only step producing the invariant ball F≤D in Corollary 3.7, which is then used in Lemma 4.6 and the global part of Theorem 2.2, and since Theorem 2.4 concerns the global solutions of Theorem 2.2, the central existence and asymptotic statements are not established as written. Please correct the exponent in the first line if it is a typo and give the complete Young argument, or supply an alternative proof of the invariant-ball estimate.

minor comments (6)

[Section 3, Lemma 3.4] The inequality is stated with an explicit constant C=1+√d/2+d/8, but no proof is provided and the cited reference [9, Lemma A.1] is not stated; please include the lemma statement or a proof adapted to the torus setting, since the constant is not obviously valid pointwise.
[Section 3, Lemma 3.8] The Gagliardo–Nirenberg step appears to yield, after Young's inequality, a differential inequality with higher powers than those stated (F² in d=2 and F³ in d=3 rather than F^{(1+α)/2}); the finite-time blow-up conclusion is unaffected, but the displayed ODE and the definition of Tmax should be corrected or the computation shown.
[Section 4, Lemma 4.9] The weak formulation (4.11) contains a boundary term ∫ m_t(T)φ(T), but no corresponding term at t=0; if test functions are not required to vanish at the endpoints, both boundary terms should appear, and the subsequent energy estimate should be written over (0,t) to avoid ambiguity.
[Section 6, Theorem 6.7] In the sentence beginning 'Let us take a sequence t_n', the third sequence is printed as χ(t_n,·) again; it should be θ(t_n,·).
[Section 7, Theorem 7.3, condition (7.7)] The small-data condition appears to have typos: it should presumably read ∥∇v0∥²_{L2} + (2ζ+λ)∥∇ div u0∥² + ζ∥curl curl u0∥² + ∥∇θ0/√θ0∥² ≤ D, consistent with the definition of F in (7.4); as printed it uses ∥v0∥² and omits the factor ζ.
[Section 7, Theorem 7.3] The statement says the constant D depends only on µ, d and T^d, but the functional F and the system (7.1) depend on the Lamé parameters ζ and λ; the dependence on ζ and λ should be included.

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged · score 0.0 of 10

No circular derivation: the new functional estimate, global/local existence, and asymptotics are proved from the PDE system with explicit estimates; self-citations are contextual and not load-bearing.

full rationale

The central claims do not reduce to their inputs. Lemma 3.2 derives an exact differential identity for the new Fisher-information functional directly from (1.1), and Lemma 3.5 then bounds it using only Hölder, Lemma 3.3, and Lemma 3.4; no fitted parameter is introduced. The smallness threshold D in (2.4) is an explicit constant built from C1 and C2, and the global-in-time bound in Corollary 3.7 is a consequence of the sign of the differential inequality, not an assumption repackaged as a conclusion. The long-time result in Theorem 6.7 identifies theta_infty from the conserved energy (Lemma 3.1) and uses entropy monotonicity (1.3) to force the omega-limit temperature to be constant; this is a genuine asymptotic argument, not a definitional equivalence. Citations to the authors' earlier works [5], [6], and [11] supply the 1D model, the half-Galerkin scheme, and a 1D asymptotic template, but the present proofs of the multidimensional statements are written out in the manuscript, so these citations are background and methodological rather than load-bearing. The Helmholtz decomposition is a standard theorem proved in Section 6.1. To the extent that the displayed Young-type step in the proof of Lemma 3.6 appears mathematically unjustified, that is a potential correctness gap, not a circularity: a false estimate is not the same as a conclusion being presupposed by its hypotheses. No step in the paper, on inspection, equates a predicted quantity with a fitted input or derives the main theorem from a self-citation standing in for the result.

Assumptions & free parameters 0 free parameters · 6 assumptions · 0 invented entities

No free parameters are fitted to data: mu is a fixed material constant, and D and C are derived constants from inequalities. No new physical entities, forces, or dimensions are introduced. The functional F is a mathematical construction, not a postulated physical quantity. The proofs rely on standard PDE machinery plus positivity and torus assumptions.

assumptions (6)

standard math Sobolev embeddings, Gagliardo-Nirenberg interpolation, Poincare inequality, and elliptic regularity on the torus T^d for d=2,3.
Used throughout the a priori estimates, for example in Lemmas 3.5, 3.8, 5.1, and 6.4.
standard math Maximal L^p regularity for linear parabolic equations (Amann's theorem) and standard elliptic regularity on the torus.
Used in Lemma 4.6 to bootstrap regularity of the approximate temperature theta_n from source terms theta_n div u_{n,t}.
standard math Aubin-Lions compactness lemma and Schaefer fixed point theorem for the half-Galerkin approximation.
Used in Proposition 4.2 and Lemma 4.8 to construct approximate solutions and pass to the limit n to infinity.
standard math Helmholtz decomposition of vector fields into divergence-free and curl-free parts on the torus.
Theorem 6.1 states and proves the torus version; the asymptotic analysis relies on this decomposition.
domain assumption The spatial domain is a flat torus with periodic boundary conditions, and all physical constants except mu are normalized to 1.
Remark 1.1 explicitly restricts the analysis to T^d to avoid boundary technicalities; the results are not claimed for general bounded domains.
domain assumption Temperature remains positive throughout the evolution; approximate solutions satisfy theta_n > 0 by the maximum principle.
The heat equation is divided by theta and log theta is used; positivity is part of Definition 2.1 and Proposition 4.2.

how reviews work

0 comments

Cite this review

Pith. "Pith review of Existence, uniqueness, and long-time asymptotic behavior of regular solutions in multidimensional thermoelasticity." pith.science (2026). https://pith.science/paper/VSQNV2LN

@misc{pith2026250720794,
  author       = {Pith},
  title        = {Pith review of: Existence, uniqueness, and long-time asymptotic behavior of regular solutions in multidimensional thermoelasticity},
  year         = {2026},
  howpublished = {\url{https://pith.science/paper/VSQNV2LN}},
  note         = {Machine review of arXiv:2507.20794}
}

read the original abstract

We study a simplified nonlinear thermoelasticity model on two- and three-dimensional tori. A novel functional involving the Fisher information associated with temperature is introduced, extending the previous one-dimensional approach from the first two authors (SIAM J.\ Math.\ Anal.\ \textbf{55} (2023), 7024--7038)) to higher dimensions. Using this functional, we prove global/local existence of unique regular solutions for small/large initial data. Furthermore, we analyze the asymptotic behavior as time approaches infinity and show that the temperature stabilizes to a constant state, while the displacement naturally decomposes into two distinct components: a divergence-free part oscillating indefinitely according to a homogeneous wave equation and a curl-free part converging to zero. Analogous results for the Lam\'e operator are also stated.

Review history (2 revisions) →

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Forward citations

Cited by 1 Pith paper

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score. Full citation record

Nonlinear Fisher information, corresponding functional inequalities and applications
math.AP 2025-09 conditional novelty 6.0 of 10

A new nonlinear Fisher information identity is used to prove global existence for the critical 1D Keller-Segel system with D=(1+u)^{-2}, S=u(1+u)^{-1}.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

22 extracted references · 22 canonical work pages · cited by 1 Pith paper

[16]

Jiang, R

S. Jiang, R. Racke, Evolution Equations in Thermoelasticity, Chapman & Hall/CRC Mono- graphs and Surveys in Pure and Applied Mathematics 112, Chapman & Hall/CRC, Boca Raton, FL, 2000

work page 2000
[1]

Adams and J

R. Adams and J. Fournier , Sobolev Spaces, Pure and Applied Mathematics (Amsterdam), 140; Elsevier/Academic Press, Amsterdam, 2003

work page 2003
[2]

Alikakos, An application of the invariance principle to reaction-diffusion equations

N. Alikakos, An application of the invariance principle to reaction-diffusion equations. J. Dif- ferential Equations33 (1979), 201-225

work page 1979
[3]

Amann, Linear and quasilinear parabolic problems, I

H. Amann, Linear and quasilinear parabolic problems, I. Birkhäuser Verlag, Basel, 1995

work page 1995
[4]

P. M. Bies , Decay of solutions of non-homogeneous hyperbolic equations, Math. Methods Appl. Sci. 48 (2025), 6375–6380

work page 2025
[5]

P. M. Bies , T. Cieślak, Global-in-time regular unique solutions with positive temperature to the 1d thermoelasticity, SIAM J. Math. Anal.55 (2023), 7024–7038

work page 2023
[6]

P. M. Bies , T. Cieślak, Time-asymptotics of a heated string, Math. Ann.391 (2025), 5941– 5964

work page 2025
[7]

Boyer, P

F. Boyer, P. F abrie, Mathematical Tools for the Study of the Incompressible Navier-Stokes Equations and Related Models, Applied Mathematical Sciences 183, Springer, New York, 2013

work page 2013

Show all 22 references

[8]

Christoforou, M

C. Christoforou, M. Galanopoulou, A. Tza v aras, Measure-valued solutions for the equa- tions of polyconvex adiabatic thermoelasticity, Discr. Contin. Dyn. Syst.39 (2019), 6175–6206

2019
[9]

Cieślak, M

T. Cieślak, M. Fuest, K. Hajduk, M. Sierżęga, On existence of global solutions for the 3D chemorepulsion system, Z. Anal. Anwend.43 (2024), 49–65

2024
[10]

Cieślak , M

T. Cieślak , M. Galić , B. Muha , A model in one-dimensional thermoelasticity, Nonlinear Anal. 216 (2022), Paper No. 112703, 21 pp

2022
[11]

Cieślak, B

T. Cieślak, B. Muha, S. Trifunović, Global weak solutions in nonlinear 3d thermoelasticity, Calc. Var.63 (2024), Paper No. 26, 36 pp

2024
[12]

C. M. Dafermos , L. Hsiao, Development of singularities in solutions of the equations of non- linear thermoelasticity, Quart. Appl. Math.,44 (1986), 463–474. 29

1986
[13]

L. C. Ev ans, Partial Differential Equations, Graduate Studies in Mathematics 19, American Mathematical Society, Providence, RI, 2020

2020
[14]

Fuest , Global solutions near homogeneous steady states in a multidimensional population model with both predator- and prey-taxis, SIAM J

M. Fuest , Global solutions near homogeneous steady states in a multidimensional population model with both predator- and prey-taxis, SIAM J. Math. Anal.52 (2020), 5865–5891

2020
[15]

Hrusa , S

W. Hrusa , S. A. Messaoudi , On formation of singularities in one-dimensional nonlinear thermoelasticity, Arch. Ration. Mech. Anal.,111 (1990), 135–151

1990
[17]

Koch, Slow decay in linear thermoelasticity, Quart

H. Koch, Slow decay in linear thermoelasticity, Quart. Appl. Math.58(4) (2000), 601–612

2000
[18]

Lebeau, E

G. Lebeau, E. Zuazua, Decay rates for the three-dimensional linear system of thermoelasticity, Arch. Ration. Mech. Anal.148(3) (1999), 179–231

1999
[19]

Lunardi , Analytic semigroups and optimal regularity in parabolic problems

A. Lunardi , Analytic semigroups and optimal regularity in parabolic problems. Birkhäuser, Berlin, 1995

1995
[20]

Moser, On Harnack’s theorem for elliptic differential equations, Comm

J. Moser, On Harnack’s theorem for elliptic differential equations, Comm. Pure Appl. Math. 14 (1961), 577-591

1961
[21]

Slaughter, The Linearized Theory of Elasticity, Birkhäuser Boston, Boston, MA, 2002

W.S. Slaughter, The Linearized Theory of Elasticity, Birkhäuser Boston, Boston, MA, 2002

2002
[22]

Slemrod, Global existence, uniqueness, and asymptotic stability of classical smooth solutions in one-dimensional non-linear thermoelasticity, Arch

M. Slemrod, Global existence, uniqueness, and asymptotic stability of classical smooth solutions in one-dimensional non-linear thermoelasticity, Arch. Ration. Mech. Anal.,76 (1981), 97–133. 30

1981

Pith tools

Reviewed August 15, 2026 · model on record in the stance chip above.

[1] [16]

Jiang, R

S. Jiang, R. Racke, Evolution Equations in Thermoelasticity, Chapman & Hall/CRC Mono- graphs and Surveys in Pure and Applied Mathematics 112, Chapman & Hall/CRC, Boca Raton, FL, 2000

work page 2000

[2] [1]

Adams and J

R. Adams and J. Fournier , Sobolev Spaces, Pure and Applied Mathematics (Amsterdam), 140; Elsevier/Academic Press, Amsterdam, 2003

work page 2003

[3] [2]

Alikakos, An application of the invariance principle to reaction-diffusion equations

N. Alikakos, An application of the invariance principle to reaction-diffusion equations. J. Dif- ferential Equations33 (1979), 201-225

work page 1979

[4] [3]

Amann, Linear and quasilinear parabolic problems, I

H. Amann, Linear and quasilinear parabolic problems, I. Birkhäuser Verlag, Basel, 1995

work page 1995

[5] [4]

P. M. Bies , Decay of solutions of non-homogeneous hyperbolic equations, Math. Methods Appl. Sci. 48 (2025), 6375–6380

work page 2025

[6] [5]

P. M. Bies , T. Cieślak, Global-in-time regular unique solutions with positive temperature to the 1d thermoelasticity, SIAM J. Math. Anal.55 (2023), 7024–7038

work page 2023

[7] [6]

P. M. Bies , T. Cieślak, Time-asymptotics of a heated string, Math. Ann.391 (2025), 5941– 5964

work page 2025

[8] [7]

Boyer, P

F. Boyer, P. F abrie, Mathematical Tools for the Study of the Incompressible Navier-Stokes Equations and Related Models, Applied Mathematical Sciences 183, Springer, New York, 2013

work page 2013