pith. sign in

arxiv: 1410.0569 · v1 · pith:VSTLCMKDnew · submitted 2014-10-02 · 💻 cs.DL

Tweets vs. Mendeley readers: How do these two social media metrics differ?

classification 💻 cs.DL
keywords mendeleydifferimpactmetricstwitterusedacademicaltmetrics
0
0 comments X
read the original abstract

A set of 1.4 million biomedical papers was analyzed with regards to how often articles are mentioned on Twitter or saved by users on Mendeley. While Twitter is a microblogging platform used by a general audience to distribute information, Mendeley is a reference manager targeted at an academic user group to organize scholarly literature. Both platforms are used as sources for so-called altmetrics to measure a new kind of research impact. This analysis shows in how far they differ and compare to traditional citation impact metrics based on a large set of PubMed papers.

This paper has not been read by Pith yet.

discussion (0)

Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.