Pith. sign in

REVIEW

Eliciting Gestures for Novel Note-taking Interactions

Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.

This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.

SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event

T0 review · schema-true

One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.

pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp

arxiv 2112.12126 v1 pith:VTPL2XTF submitted 2021-12-22 cs.HC

classification cs.HC
keywords interactionsgestureslikenote-takingintelligentnovelparticipantsagreement
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal
0 comments
read the original abstract

Handwriting recognition is improving in leaps and bounds, and this opens up new opportunities for stylus-based interactions. In particular, note-taking applications can become a more intelligent user interface, incorporating new features like autocomplete and integrated search. In this work we ran a gesture elicitation study, asking 21 participants to imagine how they would interact with an imaginary, intelligent note-taking application. We report agreement on the elicited gestures, finding that while existing common interactions are prevalent (like double taps and long presses) a number of more novel interactions (like dragging selected items to hotspots or using annotations) were also well-represented. We discuss the mental models participants drew on when explaining their gestures and what kind of feedback users might need to move to more stylus-centric interactions.

Discussion (0). Sign in to comment.

Pith tools