Pith. sign in

REVIEW 4 minor 274 references

Lecture notes on random matrix theory: the results, the applications, and the analytical tools

T0 review · 0 major / 4 minor · reviewed 2026-07-10 · grok-4.5

Challenge this review Re-run · record.json Download PDF Read on arXiv ↗ Review JSON

Pith's one-line read Classic random-matrix spectral laws can be derived transparently with the cavity method and then applied directly to nuclear spectra, ecosystem stability, PCA, and localisation.

desk verdict Solid, cavity-first lecture notes that re-derive the classic RMT laws and tools cleanly; useful reference, not a research claim. read the letter →

arxiv 2607.07868 v1 pith:VUHAX35E submitted 2026-07-08 cond-mat.dis-nn

Joseph W. Baron This is my paper · ORCID
classification cond-mat.dis-nn MSC 60B2015B5282B44 PACS 05.40.-a02.10.Yn05.45.Mt
keywords randommatrixtheorycavitymethodWignersemicircleellipticlawMarchenko-PasturAndersonlocalisationdynamicmean-fieldfreeprobability
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal

The pith

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The reading

These lecture notes show that the best-known results of random matrix theory—the semicircle law, the elliptic law, the Marchenko-Pastur law, the Kesten-McKay law, and the associated spacing statistics—can be obtained in a self-contained way by the cavity (block-inversion) method. Each law is then linked to a concrete application: nuclear energy-level spacings, May’s stability criterion for large ecosystems, principal-component analysis and the BBP transition, Anderson localisation on random regular graphs, and the spectra of complex networks. A second part re-derives the same results with the diagrammatic, replica, path-integral and supersymmetric formalisms, free probability and population dynamics, so that a practitioner can see when each tool is most useful. The notes therefore give both a pedagogical route into the classic theorems and a practical reference for choosing the right analytic method.

What carries the argument

The cavity (Schur-complement / block-inversion) method applied to the resolvent: deleting one row and column produces self-consistent equations for the diagonal Green functions that become deterministic by concentration of large sums, after which the Stieltjes inversion recovers the eigenvalue density.

What would settle it

For any of the ensembles (GOE, elliptic, Wishart, random-regular adjacency, …) compute the empirical resolvent or eigenvalue histogram at moderate but increasing N and check whether the deviation from the predicted density or outlier location scales as claimed; a systematic O(1) discrepancy that does not vanish would falsify the concentration step.

Watch

Extended reading notes

Core claim

In the large-N limit, under standard moment conditions on the matrix entries, the cavity equations for the resolvent close and concentrate, yielding the classic spectral densities (semicircle, elliptic, Marchenko-Pastur, Kesten-McKay, …) and the associated outlier eigenvalues and spacing statistics; the same densities control the listed applications once the appropriate random matrix is identified.

Load-bearing premise

The large-N concentration arguments (central-limit behaviour of cavity sums, vanishing of off-diagonal resolvent entries, tree-like factorisation on sparse graphs) remain uniformly valid for every ensemble and application treated.

Editorial extensions

If this is right

  • Nuclear level-spacing histograms should match the Wigner surmise once the spectrum is unfolded.
  • An ecosystem whose Jacobian has mean and variance exceeding the May thresholds will be unstable, with the nature of the instability (oscillatory versus exponential) fixed by whether the bulk ellipse or the outlier crosses the stability line.
  • PCA recovers a population spike only above the BBP threshold; below it the principal-component overlap vanishes and the sample spectrum is pure Marchenko-Pastur noise.
  • On a random regular graph the Anderson model exhibits a mobility edge separating extended bulk states from exponentially localised Lifshitz-tail states once the on-site disorder is large enough.
  • The same cavity equations supply the spectral edge that sets the epidemic threshold on a configuration-model network and the diffusion instability threshold of its Laplacian.

Reading between the lines

Editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • Because the notes deliberately juxtapose cavity, replica, supersymmetry and free-probability derivations of the same semicircle, a reader can treat them as a controlled comparison of analytic cost versus range of validity for any new disordered model.
  • The explicit DMFT treatment of the spherical p-spin and generalised Lotka-Volterra systems suggests that the same cavity-plus-mean-field pipeline can be reused for other high-dimensional non-linear dynamics whose linearised Jacobians are random.
  • The population-dynamics algorithm of the final section is presented as a numerical solver for the cavity equations; it therefore offers a practical route to spectral densities of sparse or non-homogeneous ensembles that lack closed-form solutions.
  • Finance applications of Marchenko-Pastur cleaning are given only briefly, yet the rotationally-invariant estimator formulae are complete enough that a practitioner could implement optimal shrinkage on real covariance matrices without further derivation.
Share X Bluesky LinkedIn Reddit HN

Signed reviews

No signed human review yet.

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, and a circularity audit.

Referee Report

0 major / 4 minor

Summary. These lecture notes derive the classic large-N spectral laws of random matrix theory (Wigner semicircle, Girko elliptic law and outliers, Marchenko-Pastur with BBP transition, Kesten-McKay, sparse-network spectra) primarily via the cavity/block-inversion method, then illustrate each law with a concrete application (nuclear level spacings, May ecosystems and Lotka-Volterra/neural stability, PCA and covariance cleaning, Anderson localisation on RRGs, network Laplacians). Part 2 re-derives the semicircle (and selected extensions) from first principles with diagrammatic, replica, supersymmetric and MSRJD path-integral methods, and adds free probability, population dynamics and Dyson Brownian motion. Exercises close most sections. The central claim is pedagogical: the cavity route is elementary and transparent under standard moment conditions, the same laws control the listed applications, and the advanced formalisms become useful in complementary regimes.

Significance. If the notes are adopted as a graduate reference they fill a genuine gap: a single, self-contained treatment that (i) derives the workhorse spectral laws with the cavity method rather than heavy combinatorics or replicas, (ii) immediately embeds each law in a modern application (ecology, finance, localisation, networks), and (iii) supplies a comparative toolkit of the advanced methods used in the disordered-systems literature. The derivations recover the known closed forms, numerical checks against single large matrices are shown throughout, and the exercises are well-chosen. The absence of free parameters or circular definitions, together with the explicit discussion of when each method is advantageous, makes the manuscript a high-value pedagogical resource for the cond-mat.dis-nn and adjacent communities.

minor comments (4)
  1. Throughout Part 1 the large-N concentration steps (CLT on cavity sums, vanishing of off-diagonal resolvent entries, tree-like factorisation) are invoked without quantitative error bounds or references to the rigorous literature that supplies them. A short paragraph or footnote in §II.D–F (and analogous places in §§III, V, VII) pointing to the relevant theorems would strengthen the notes without changing their pedagogical character.
  2. Figure captions and axis labels are occasionally terse (e.g. Figs. 7–11, 17–19). Adding the precise ensemble parameters and the meaning of solid/dashed curves would improve readability for students.
  3. A few typographical inconsistencies remain (Marčenko vs Marchenko, occasional missing spaces around equations). A light copy-edit pass would remove them.
  4. The population-dynamics section (XV) is very brief relative to the other advanced tools. A short worked example (e.g. the sparse ER cavity equations of §VIII) would make the method more immediately usable.

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged · score 0.0 of 10

No significant circularity: pedagogical re-derivations of classic RMT laws from block inversion, CLT concentration, and standard transforms, without fitted inputs or self-definitional loops.

full rationale

These are self-contained lecture notes. Part 1 derives the semicircle (II), elliptic law (III), DMFT order parameters (IV), Marchenko-Pastur/BBP (V), Coulomb-gas/DBM joint laws (VI), Kesten-McKay and localisation diagnostics (VII), and sparse-network spectra (VIII) by the cavity/block-inversion method plus large-N concentration of cavity sums and vanishing of off-diagonal resolvent entries. Each step starts from the definition of the resolvent (or Hermitised resolvent), applies the Schur complement, invokes CLT/moment conditions that are stated explicitly, and solves a closed equation for G(z) or C(z,z*); the density is then recovered by the inverse Stieltjes (or 2D) transform. No parameter is fitted to data and then re-presented as a prediction of that same data; numerical checks are comparisons, not calibration. Part 2 re-derives the same laws via diagrams, replicas, SUSY, path integrals, free probability, and population dynamics from first principles, again without circular definitions. Applications (nuclear spacings, May stability, PCA cleaning, Anderson IPR, etc.) use the derived spectra as inputs; they do not define the spectra in terms of the application outcomes. There is no load-bearing self-citation of an author-owned uniqueness theorem, no ansatz smuggled solely via self-citation, and no renaming of an empirical pattern as a new derivation. The concentration arguments lack quantitative error bounds, but that is a completeness/rigour issue, not circularity. Score 0 is therefore appropriate.

Assumptions & free parameters 0 free parameters · 3 assumptions · 0 invented entities

As pure exposition the notes inherit the standard large-N assumptions of RMT (i.i.d. or weakly dependent entries with controlled moments, thermodynamic limit before spectral smoothing, tree-like factorisation on sparse graphs). No free parameters are fitted and no new entities are postulated.

assumptions (3)
  • domain assumption Matrix entries are independent (up to Hermiticity) with vanishing mean, variance O(1/N) and higher moments o(1/N); the empirical spectral measure concentrates.
    Invoked throughout Part 1 (e.g. Eqs. (18), (40), (164)) to justify cavity-sum concentration and universality.
  • domain assumption Off-diagonal resolvent elements are negligible in the large-N limit.
    Used repeatedly (II.F, III.F, V.C) to close the cavity equations; standard but not proved with error bounds here.
  • domain assumption Sparse graphs are locally tree-like so that cavity factorisation holds.
    Central to the Anderson and network sections (VII.C, VIII).

how reviews work

0 comments
Cite this review

Pith. "Pith review of Lecture notes on random matrix theory: the results, the applications, and the analytical tools." pith.science (2026). https://pith.science/paper/VUHAX35E

@misc{pith2026260707868,
  author       = {Pith},
  title        = {Pith review of: Lecture notes on random matrix theory: the results, the applications, and the analytical tools},
  year         = {2026},
  howpublished = {\url{https://pith.science/paper/VUHAX35E}},
  note         = {Machine review of arXiv:2607.07868}
}
read the original abstract

Random matrix theory has established itself as a theoretical cornerstone of the mathematical sciences over the past century. It has undeniable utility in areas of research as diverse as nuclear physics, finance, ecology and disordered systems. The purpose of these notes is twofold. First, the most famous and widely used classic results are derived in a pedagogical manner, mostly using the comparatively elementary and transparent cavity method. The significance of each result is then demonstrated in the context of a particular application. There are also some select exercises at the end of each section. In the second part of these notes, a reference guide of analytical techniques for the random-matrix/disordered-systems practitioner is provided. Introducing the diagrammatic, replica, path-integral, and supersymmetric formalisms from first principles, we rederive some of the aforementioned classic results, particularly focussing on the simplest one -- the semicircle law. Innovations such as the population dynamics method and the tools of free probability theory are also included. We discuss the merits of each analytical approach, and we highlight the contexts in which each becomes particularly useful.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2607.07868 by the authors.

Figure 1
Figure 1. FIG. 1: The eigenvalues of a square matrix of size [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p008_1.png] view at source ↗
Figure 2
Figure 2. FIG. 2: A (vastly incomplete) timeline of random matrix theory. [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p009_2.png] view at source ↗
Figure 3
Figure 3. FIG. 3: Histograms of the eigenvalues for a single symmetric Gaussian random matrix with [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p012_3.png] view at source ↗
Figures from the paper (38 more)
Figure 4
Figure 4. Figure 4: FIG. 4: Comparison of Im[ [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p018_4.png]
Figure 5
Figure 5. Figure 5: FIG. 5: Universality of the semicircle law. As long as the elements [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p020_5.png]
Figure 6
Figure 6. Figure 6: FIG. 6: Comparison of numerical diagonalisation results to the Wigner surmise in Eq. (32) for [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p023_6.png]
Figure 7
Figure 7. Figure 7: FIG. 7: Example eigenvalue spectra of the matrix [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p029_7.png]
Figure 8
Figure 8. Figure 8: FIG. 8: Comparison of [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p031_8.png]
Figure 9
Figure 9. Figure 9: FIG. 9: Tests of the uniform eigenvalue density given in Eq. (63). (Left) Integrated eigenvalue [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p036_9.png]
Figure 10
Figure 10. Figure 10: FIG. 10: Sketch of [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p038_10.png]
Figure 11
Figure 11. Figure 11: FIG. 11: The nature of the dynamics depending on the spectrum. (Top) Stable fixed point with [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p039_11.png]
Figure 12
Figure 12. Figure 12: FIG. 12: Schematic illustration of the idea of mean-field theory. [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p049_12.png]
Figure 13
Figure 13. Figure 13: FIG. 13: Relaxational dynamics of the system in Eq. (94) compared with the DMFT predictions [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p057_13.png]
Figure 14
Figure 14. Figure 14: FIG. 14: Power spectrum of fluctuations for the system in Eq. (94) compared with the DMFT [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p058_14.png]
Figure 15
Figure 15. Figure 15: FIG. 15: Solutions to Eq. (144) for various [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p063_15.png]
Figure 16
Figure 16. Figure 16: FIG. 16: (Left): Some quasi-1-dimensional data. The location of a point in the ( [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p068_16.png]
Figure 17
Figure 17. Figure 17: FIG. 17: Verification of the Marˇcenko-Pastur law and associated outlier in Eqs. (174) and (184). [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p074_17.png]
Figure 18
Figure 18. Figure 18: FIG. 18: Comparison of numerical diagonalisation results to Eq. (194). Numerical results are for [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p077_18.png]
Figure 19
Figure 19. Figure 19: FIG. 19: (Left) Comparison of the rescaled eigenvalues [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p081_19.png]
Figure 20
Figure 20. Figure 20: FIG. 20: Eigenvalues that form the Wigner semicircle can be thought of as ‘charged particles’ [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p089_20.png]
Figure 21
Figure 21. Figure 21: FIG. 21: Eigenvalue density for the potential [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p092_21.png]
Figure 22
Figure 22. Figure 22: FIG. 22: Eigenvalue density correlations in the cases [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p093_22.png]
Figure 23
Figure 23. Figure 23: FIG. 23: Illustration of the cavity factorisation on a tree-like graph. The highlighted node is [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p101_23.png]
Figure 24
Figure 24. Figure 24: FIG. 24: Kesten-McKay law for [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p103_24.png]
Figure 25
Figure 25. Figure 25: FIG. 25: The bulk and tail regions of the eigenvalue spectrum. Here, the prediction in Eq. (269) [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p106_25.png]
Figure 26
Figure 26. Figure 26: FIG. 26: The eigenvalue density (numerical results represented by bars) and the IPR (red crosses [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p107_26.png]
Figure 27
Figure 27. Figure 27: FIG. 27: Crossover from Wigner-Dyson statistics (in the continuous bulk part of the spectrum) [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p110_27.png]
Figure 28
Figure 28. Figure 28: FIG. 28: Eigenvalue density for [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p114_28.png]
Figure 29
Figure 29. Figure 29: FIG. 29: SIR dynamics and the associated eigenvalue spectra, with and without a network hub. [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p122_29.png]
Figure 30
Figure 30. Figure 30: FIG. 30: Eigenvalue density of the Laplacian matrix with [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p124_30.png]
Figure 31
Figure 31. Figure 31: FIG. 31: Turing instability on the 1D chain and the ER graph with [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p127_31.png]
Figure 32
Figure 32. Figure 32: FIG. 32: Eigenvalue density of the scaled adjacency matrix of a configuration model network. [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p129_32.png]
Figure 33
Figure 33. Figure 33: FIG. 33: Eigenvalue density of the sum of a GOE matrix and a standard Wischart matrix. The [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p145_33.png]
Figure 34
Figure 34. Figure 34: FIG. 34: Eigenvalue density of the product of a standard Wischart and a GOE matrix. The [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p147_34.png]
Figure 35
Figure 35. Figure 35: FIG. 35: (Top) The diagrammatic representation of the quartic term before pairing. (Bottom) [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p156_35.png]
Figure 36
Figure 36. Figure 36: FIG. 36: Possible planar Wick pairings for the second term in the expansion of [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p157_36.png]
Figure 37
Figure 37. Figure 37: FIG. 37: (Left) The order parameters [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p166_37.png]
Figure 38
Figure 38. Figure 38: FIG. 38: Critical temperature as a function of [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p167_38.png]
Figure 39
Figure 39. Figure 39: FIG. 39: Eigenvalue density of the GUE ensemble, with [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p185_39.png]
Figure 40
Figure 40. Figure 40: FIG. 40: The sum over all possible diagrams. Recognising the self-similarity of the series, this can [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p207_40.png]
Figure 41
Figure 41. Figure 41: FIG. 41: Eigenvalue density of the scaled adjacency matrices (left) with [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p212_41.png]

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

274 extracted references · 274 canonical work pages

  1. [1]

    It is also possible to make a perturbative expansion of the response functions in model parameters other than 1/Nusing the diagrammatic approach [56, 187] (see also the exercises)

    using the Keldysh dynamic formalism [248, 249]). It is also possible to make a perturbative expansion of the response functions in model parameters other than 1/Nusing the diagrammatic approach [56, 187] (see also the exercises). Here, we use the computation of the semicircle law to demonstrate the diagrammatic approach. Needless to say, the diagrammatic ...

    work page

  2. [2]

    Evaluation using Wick’s theorem We begin with Eq. (547). Writing the path integral explicitly, and consulting Eq. (549), we may write the disorder-averaged response functions (in the caseµ= 0 and Γ = 1) as * 1 N X k Rkk(T,0) + = Z D[x,ˆx] − i N X k xk(T)ˆxk(0) ! exp [S0 +S int],(572) where we identify the so-called ‘bare’ action and the interaction term r...

    work page

  3. [3]

    (574) is a daunting task

    Feynman diagrams as a combinatorial tool Keeping track of the huge variety of ‘Wick pairings’ in the sum in Eq. (574) is a daunting task. A useful strategy is to use Feynman diagrams, which help to identify the terms that are (non- )vanishing in the limitN→ ∞, as well as being a convenient bookkeeping tool. We have already seen that Wick pairings can vani...

    work page

  4. [4]

    The only Wick pairings that we need to consider pair solely hatted and unhatted dynamic variables

    work page

  5. [5]

    The only non-vanishing Wick pairings forN→ ∞correspond to planar diagrams with non-crossing and non-twisted arcs

    work page

  6. [6]

    One therefore sees that the sum in Eq

    The number of combinations of Wick pairings that are equivalent up to time ordering always exactly cancels a prefactor, allowing us to discard the labelling of the internal nodes in the Feynman diagrams. One therefore sees that the sum in Eq. (574) can be evaluated in the thermodynamic limit by considering the set of all planar rainbow diagrams. As a fina...

    work page

  7. [7]

    i X i Z dtψixi − σ2 T 2 X i Z dtˆx2 i (t) # ×exp

    Resummation of the diagrammatic series We employ one additional diagrammatic convention to simplify the notation when we perform sums over many diagrams. We denote a sum of planar diagrams by an edge with a double arrow, accompanied by a label for identification purposes. For example, let us take the surviving planar diagrams for the second-order term abo...

    work page

  8. [8]

    Initialise a populationG (cav) i with random complex values andi= 1,· · ·, N pop

    work page

Show all 274 references
  1. [9]

    For eachi, draw a value ofk i from the distributionkP k/p

  2. [10]

    For eachi, select at random a subsetS i of sizek i −1 from the rangej= 1,· · ·, N pop, and calculateG ′ i = 1 ω−iϵ− 1 p P j∈Si G(cav) j

  3. [11]

    Repeat from Step 2 until the quantityG cav =N −1 pop P i G(cav) i converges

  4. [12]

    Perform Steps 2 to 4 once more

    Once convergence has occurred, we begin the sampling phase. Perform Steps 2 to 4 once more. 213

  5. [13]

    Select a random subsetS j of sizek j from the rangel= 1,· · ·, N pop

    Draw a valuek j from the distributionP k. Select a random subsetS j of sizek j from the rangel= 1,· · ·, N pop. ComputeG j = 1 ω−iη− 1 p P l∈Sj G(cav) l

  6. [14]

    Compute the quantityG α = N −1 samp PNsamp j=1 Gj

    Repeat Step 7 a numberN samp times to obtain a set{G j}. Compute the quantityG α = N −1 samp PNsamp j=1 Gj

  7. [15]

    ComputeG(ω) = N −1 iter PNiter α=1 Gα

    Repeat Steps 6 to 8 a numberN iter times to obtain a set{G α}. ComputeG(ω) = N −1 iter PNiter α=1 Gα. This is our final estimate of the resolvent for a fixed valueω

  8. [16]

    The eigenvalue density is then obtained via ρ(ω) =π −1ImG(ω)

    Repeat Steps 1 to 9 for all desired values ofω. The eigenvalue density is then obtained via ρ(ω) =π −1ImG(ω). The results of performing this procedure are show in Fig. 41. To adapt the method for the Laplacian matrix, we instead use the update ruleG ′ i = 1 ω−iϵ+ 1 p P j∈Si 1 ...

  9. [17]

    M. L. Mehta,Random matrices, Vol. 142 (Elsevier, 2004)

    2004

  10. [18]

    R. Haq, A. Pandey, and O. Bohigas, Fluctuation properties of nuclear energy levels: Do theory and experiment agree?, Physical Review Letters48, 1086 (1982)

    1982

  11. [19]

    Weidenm¨ uller and G

    H. Weidenm¨ uller and G. Mitchell, Random matrices and chaos in nuclear physics: Nuclear structure, Reviews of Modern Physics81, 539 (2009)

    2009

  12. [20]

    R. M. May, Will a large complex system be stable?, Nature238, 413 (1972). 214

    1972

  13. [21]

    Allesina and S

    S. Allesina and S. Tang, The stability–complexity relationship at age 40: a random matrix perspective, Population Ecology57, 63 (2015)

    2015

  14. [22]

    J. Baik, G. Ben Arous, and S. P´ ech´ e, Phase transition of the largest eigenvalue for nonnull complex sample covariance matrices, Ann. Probab.33, 1643 (2005)

    2005

  15. [23]

    Laloux, P

    L. Laloux, P. Cizeau, M. Potters, and J.-P. Bouchaud, Random matrix theory and financial correla- tions, International Journal of Theoretical and Applied Finance3, 391 (2000)

    2000

  16. [24]

    Potters, J.-P

    M. Potters, J.-P. Bouchaud, and L. Laloux, Financial applications of random matrix theory: Old laces and new pieces, arXiv preprint physics/0507111 (2005)

    2005 arXiv

  17. [25]

    M´ ezard, G

    M. M´ ezard, G. Parisi, and M. A. Virasoro,Spin glass theory and beyond: An Introduction to the Replica Method and Its Applications, Vol. 9 (World Scientific Publishing Company, 1987)

    1987

  18. [26]

    Evers and A

    F. Evers and A. D. Mirlin, Anderson transitions, Reviews of Modern Physics80, 1355 (2008)

    2008

  19. [27]

    Bohigaset al.,Random matrix theories and chaotic dynamics, Tech

    O. Bohigaset al.,Random matrix theories and chaotic dynamics, Tech. Rep. (Paris-11 Univ., 91-Orsay (France). Inst. de Physique Nucleaire, 1991)

    1991

  20. [28]

    Bohigas and M.-J

    O. Bohigas and M.-J. Giannoni, Chaotic motion and random matrix theories, inMathematical and Computational Methods in Nuclear Physics: Proceedings of the Sixth Granada Workshop Held in Granada, Spain, October 3–8, 1983(Springer, 2005) pp. 1–99

    1983

  21. [29]

    Di Francesco, P

    P. Di Francesco, P. Ginsparg, and J. Zinn-Justin, 2d gravity and random matrices, Physics Reports 254, 1 (1995)

    1995

  22. [30]

    J. P. Keating and N. C. Snaith, Random matrix theory andζ(1/2+ it), Communications in Mathe- matical Physics214, 57 (2000)

    2000

  23. [31]

    A. M. Odlyzko, On the distribution of spacings between zeros of the zeta function, Mathematics of Computation48, 273 (1987)

    1987

  24. [32]

    Johansson, Non-intersecting paths, random tilings and random matrices, Probability theory and related fields123, 225 (2002)

    K. Johansson, Non-intersecting paths, random tilings and random matrices, Probability theory and related fields123, 225 (2002)

    2002

  25. [33]

    E. P. Wigner, Characteristic vectors of bordered matrices with infinite dimensions, Annals of Mathe- matics62, 548 (1955)

    1955

  26. [34]

    Wigner, Conference on neutron physics by time-of-flight, Oak Ridge National Lab

    E. Wigner, Conference on neutron physics by time-of-flight, Oak Ridge National Lab. Report ORNL- 2309 (1957)

    1957

  27. [35]

    E. P. Wigner, On the distribution of the roots of certain symmetric matrices, Annals of Mathematics 67, 325 (1958)

    1958

  28. [36]

    E. P. Wigner, Random matrices in physics, SIAM review9, 1 (1967)

    1967

  29. [37]

    E. P. Wigner, Characteristic vectors of bordered matrices with infinite dimensions i, inThe Collected Works of Eugene Paul Wigner: Part A: The Scientific Papers(Springer, 1993) pp. 524–540

    1993

  30. [38]

    D. V. Widder, The stieltjes transform, Transactions of the American Mathematical Society43, 7 (1938)

    1938

  31. [39]

    K¨ uhn, Spectra of sparse random matrices, Journal of Physics A: Mathematical and Theoretical41, 295002 (2008)

    R. K¨ uhn, Spectra of sparse random matrices, Journal of Physics A: Mathematical and Theoretical41, 295002 (2008). 215

    2008

  32. [40]

    Rogers, I

    T. Rogers, I. P. Castillo, R. K¨ uhn, and K. Takeda, Cavity approach to the spectral density of sparse symmetric random matrices, Physical Review E—Statistical, Nonlinear, and Soft Matter Physics78, 031116 (2008)

    2008

  33. [41]

    Gaudin, Sur la loi limite de l’espacement des valeurs propres d’une matrice ale´ atoire, Nuclear Physics25, 447 (1961)

    M. Gaudin, Sur la loi limite de l’espacement des valeurs propres d’une matrice ale´ atoire, Nuclear Physics25, 447 (1961)

    1961

  34. [42]

    Efetov, Supersymmetry and theory of disordered metals, advances in Physics32, 53 (1983)

    K. Efetov, Supersymmetry and theory of disordered metals, advances in Physics32, 53 (1983)

    1983

  35. [43]

    Erd˝ os, Universality of wigner random matrices: a survey of recent results, Russian Mathematical Surveys66, 507 (2011)

    L. Erd˝ os, Universality of wigner random matrices: a survey of recent results, Russian Mathematical Surveys66, 507 (2011)

    2011

  36. [44]

    A. D. Mirlin and Y. V. Fyodorov, Universality of level correlation function of sparse random matrices, Journal of Physics A: Mathematical and General24, 2273 (1991)

    1991

  37. [45]

    F. J. Dyson, Statistical theory of the energy levels of complex systems. i, Journal of Mathematical Physics3, 140 (1962)

    1962

  38. [46]

    F. J. Dyson, The threefold way. algebraic structure of symmetry groups and ensembles in quantum mechanics, Journal of Mathematical Physics3, 1199 (1962)

    1962

  39. [47]

    F. J. Dyson, Statistical theory of the energy levels of complex systems. iii, Journal of Mathematical Physics3, 166 (1962)

    1962

  40. [48]

    Bohigas, M.-J

    O. Bohigas, M.-J. Giannoni, and C. Schmit, Characterization of chaotic quantum spectra and univer- sality of level fluctuation laws, Physical review letters52, 1 (1984)

    1984

  41. [49]

    H. L. Montgomery, The pair correlation of zeros of the zeta function, inProc. Symp. Pure Math, Vol. 24 (1973) p. 1

    1973

  42. [50]

    Rajan and L

    K. Rajan and L. F. Abbott, Eigenvalue spectra of random matrices for neural networks, Physical review letters97, 188104 (2006)

    2006

  43. [51]

    Sompolinsky, A

    H. Sompolinsky, A. Crisanti, and H.-J. Sommers, Chaos in random neural networks, Physical review letters61, 259 (1988)

    1988

  44. [52]

    Aljadeff, M

    J. Aljadeff, M. Stern, and T. Sharpee, Transition to chaos in random networks with cell-type-specific connectivity, Physical review letters114, 088101 (2015)

    2015

  45. [53]

    Molgedey, J

    L. Molgedey, J. Schuchhardt, and H. G. Schuster, Suppressing chaos in neural networks by noise, Physical review letters69, 3717 (1992)

    1992

  46. [54]

    Haake, F

    F. Haake, F. Izrailev, N. Lehmann, D. Saher, and H.-J. Sommers, Statistics of complex levels of random matrices for decaying systems, Zeitschrift f¨ ur Physik B Condensed Matter88, 359 (1992)

    1992

  47. [55]

    Feinberg and A

    J. Feinberg and A. Zee, Non-hermitian random matrix theory: Method of hermitian reduction, Nuclear Physics B504, 579 (1997)

    1997

  48. [56]

    R. M. May,Stability and complexity in model ecosystems, Vol. 6 (Princeton university press, 2001)

    2001

  49. [57]

    M. A. Nowak and W. Tarnowski, Probing non-orthogonality of eigenvectors in non-hermitian matrix models: diagrammatic approach, Journal of High Energy Physics2018, 1 (2018)

    2018

  50. [58]

    V. L. Girko, Circular law, Theory of Probability & Its Applications29, 694 (1985)

    1985

  51. [59]

    Girko, Elliptic law, Theory of Probability & Its Applications30, 677 (1986)

    V. Girko, Elliptic law, Theory of Probability & Its Applications30, 677 (1986). 216

    1986

  52. [60]

    R. A. Janik, M. A. Nowak, G. Papp, and I. Zahed, Non-hermitian random matrix models, Nuclear Physics B501, 603 (1997)

    1997

  53. [61]

    H. J. Sommers, A. Crisanti, H. Sompolinsky, and Y. Stein, Spectrum of large random asymmetric matrices, Physical review letters60, 1895 (1988)

    1988

  54. [62]

    Rogers, Universal sum and product rules for random matrices, Journal of mathematical physics51 (2010)

    T. Rogers, Universal sum and product rules for random matrices, Journal of mathematical physics51 (2010)

    2010

  55. [63]

    Benaych-Georges and R

    F. Benaych-Georges and R. R. Nadakuditi, The eigenvalues and eigenvectors of finite, low rank per- turbations of large random matrices, Advances in Mathematics227, 494 (2011)

    2011

  56. [64]

    O’Rourke and D

    S. O’Rourke and D. Renfrew, Low rank perturbations of large elliptic random matrices, (2014)

    2014

  57. [65]

    J. W. Baron, T. J. Jewell, C. Ryder, and T. Galla, Eigenvalues of random matrices with generalized correlations: A path integral approach, Physical Review Letters128, 120601 (2022)

    2022

  58. [66]

    J. W. Baron, T. J. Jewell, C. Ryder, and T. Galla, Breakdown of random-matrix universality in persistent lotka-volterra communities, Physical Review Letters130, 137401 (2023)

    2023

  59. [67]

    S. F. Edwards and R. C. Jones, The eigenvalue spectrum of a large symmetric random matrix, Journal of Physics A: Mathematical and General9, 1595 (1976)

    1976

  60. [68]

    Ikeda, Bose–einstein-like condensation of deformed random matrix: a replica approach, Journal of Statistical Mechanics: Theory and Experiment2023, 023302 (2023)

    H. Ikeda, Bose–einstein-like condensation of deformed random matrix: a replica approach, Journal of Statistical Mechanics: Theory and Experiment2023, 023302 (2023)

    2023

  61. [69]

    J. Hu, D. R. Amor, M. Barbier, G. Bunin, and J. Gore, Emergent phases of ecological diversity and dynamics mapped in microcosms, Science378, 85 (2022)

    2022

  62. [70]

    G. J. Rodgers, K. Austin, B. Kahng, and D. Kim, Eigenvalue spectra of complex networks, Journal of Physics A: Mathematical and General38, 9431 (2005)

    2005

  63. [71]

    J. W. Baron, Eigenvalue spectra and stability of directed complex networks, Physical Review E106, 064302 (2022)

    2022

  64. [72]

    J. W. Baron, Path-integral approach to sparse non-hermitian random matrices, Physical Review E 111, 034217 (2025)

    2025

  65. [73]

    Valigi, J

    P. Valigi, J. W. Baron, I. Neri, G. Biroli, and C. Cammarota, Eigenvalue spectral tails and localisation properties of asymmetric networks, Journal of Physics A: Mathematical and Theoretical58, 455002 (2025)

    2025

  66. [74]

    J. W. Baron and T. Galla, Dispersal-induced instability in complex ecosystems, Nature communica- tions11, 6032 (2020)

    2020

  67. [75]

    Allesina, J

    S. Allesina, J. Grilli, G. Barab´ as, S. Tang, J. Aljadeff, and A. Maritan, Predicting the stability of large structured food webs, Nature communications6, 7842 (2015)

    2015

  68. [76]

    Poley, T

    L. Poley, T. Galla, and J. W. Baron, Eigenvalue spectra of finely structured random matrices, Physical Review E109, 064301 (2024)

    2024

  69. [77]

    Barab´ as, M

    G. Barab´ as, M. J. Michalska-Smith, and S. Allesina, Self-regulation and the stability of large ecological networks, Nature ecology & evolution1, 1870 (2017)

    2017

  70. [78]

    Pigani, D

    E. Pigani, D. Sgarbossa, S. Suweis, A. Maritan, and S. Azaele, Delay effects on the stability of large 217 ecosystems, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences119, e2211449119 (2022)

    2022

  71. [79]

    Gravel, F

    D. Gravel, F. Massol, and M. A. Leibold, Stability and complexity in model meta-ecosystems, Nature communications7, 12457 (2016)

    2016

  72. [80]

    Bunin, Interaction patterns and diversity in assembled ecological communities, arXiv preprint arXiv:1607.04734 (2016)

    G. Bunin, Interaction patterns and diversity in assembled ecological communities, arXiv preprint arXiv:1607.04734 (2016)

    2016 arXiv

  73. [81]

    Galla, Dynamically evolved community size and stability of random lotka-volterra ecosystems (a), Europhysics Letters123, 48004 (2018)

    T. Galla, Dynamically evolved community size and stability of random lotka-volterra ecosystems (a), Europhysics Letters123, 48004 (2018)

    2018

  74. [82]

    Stone, The feasibility and stability of large complex biological networks: a random matrix approach, Scientific reports8, 1 (2018)

    L. Stone, The feasibility and stability of large complex biological networks: a random matrix approach, Scientific reports8, 1 (2018)

    2018

  75. [83]

    Biroli, G

    G. Biroli, G. Bunin, and C. Cammarota, Marginally stable equilibria in critical ecosystems, New Journal of Physics20, 083051 (2018)

    2018

  76. [84]

    Gardiner,Stochastic methods, Vol

    C. Gardiner,Stochastic methods, Vol. 4 (Springer Berlin Heidelberg, 2009)

    2009

  77. [85]

    Bunin, Ecological communities with lotka-volterra dynamics, Physical Review E95, 042414 (2017)

    G. Bunin, Ecological communities with lotka-volterra dynamics, Physical Review E95, 042414 (2017)

    2017

  78. [86]

    F. Roy, G. Biroli, G. Bunin, and C. Cammarota, Numerical implementation of dynamical mean field theory for disordered systems: Application to the lotka–volterra model of ecosystems, Journal of Physics A: Mathematical and Theoretical52, 484001 (2019)

    2019

  79. [87]

    Altieri, F

    A. Altieri, F. Roy, C. Cammarota, and G. Biroli, Properties of equilibria and glassy phases of the random lotka-volterra model with demographic noise, Physical Review Letters126, 258301 (2021)

    2021

  80. [88]

    Altieri, G

    A. Altieri, G. Biroli, and C. Cammarota, Dynamical mean-field theory and aging dynamics, Journal of Physics A: Mathematical and Theoretical53, 375006 (2020)

    2020

  81. [89]

    Crisanti, H

    A. Crisanti, H. Horner, and H.-J. Sommers, The spherical p-spin interaction spin-glass model: the dynamics, Zeitschrift f¨ ur Physik B Condensed Matter92, 257 (1993)

    1993

  82. [90]

    D. A. Sakthivadivel, Magnetisation and mean field theory in the ising model, SciPost Physics Lecture Notes , 035 (2022)

    2022

  83. [91]

    Sompolinsky and A

    H. Sompolinsky and A. Zippelius, Dynamic theory of the spin-glass phase, Physical Review Letters 47, 359 (1981)

    1981

  84. [92]

    Sompolinsky and A

    H. Sompolinsky and A. Zippelius, Relaxational dynamics of the edwards-anderson model and the mean-field theory of spin-glasses, Physical Review B25, 6860 (1982)

    1982

  85. [93]

    De Dominicis, Dynamics as a substitute for replicas in systems with quenched random impurities, Phys

    C. De Dominicis, Dynamics as a substitute for replicas in systems with quenched random impurities, Phys. Rev. B18, 4913 (1978)

    1978

  86. [94]

    P. C. Martin, E. D. Siggia, and H. A. Rose, Statistical dynamics of classical systems, Physical Review A8, 423 (1973)

    1973

  87. [95]

    H.-K. Janssen, On a lagrangean for classical field dynamics and renormalization group calculations of dynamical critical properties, Zeitschrift f¨ ur Physik B Condensed Matter23, 377 (1976)

    1976

  88. [96]

    C. d. Dominicis, Techniques de renormalisation de la th´ eorie des champs et dynamique des ph´ enomenes critiques, inJ. Phys., Colloq, Vol. 37 (1976) p. 247

    1976

  89. [97]

    D. J. Thouless, P. W. Anderson, and R. G. Palmer, Solution of’solvable model of a spin glass’, 218 Philosophical Magazine35, 593 (1977)

    1977

  90. [98]

    Onsager, Electric moments of molecules in liquids, Journal of the American Chemical Society58, 1486 (1936)

    L. Onsager, Electric moments of molecules in liquids, Journal of the American Chemical Society58, 1486 (1936)

    1936

  91. [99]

    L. F. Cugliandolo and J. Kurchan, Analytical solution of the off-equilibrium dynamics of a long-range spin-glass model, Physical Review Letters71, 173 (1993)

    1993

  92. [100]

    Opper and S

    M. Opper and S. Diederich, Phase transition and 1/f noise in a game dynamical model, Physical review letters69, 1616 (1992)

    1992

  93. [101]

    H. D. Young, R. A. Freedman, T. Sandin, and A. L. Ford,University physics, Vol. 9 (Addison-Wesley Reading, MA, 1996)

    1996

  94. [102]

    T. Galla, Intrinsic fluctuations in stochastic delay systems: Theoretical description and application to a simple model of gene regulation, Physical Review E—Statistical, Nonlinear, and Soft Matter Physics 80, 021909 (2009)

    2009

  95. [103]

    Brett and T

    T. Brett and T. Galla, Stochastic processes with distributed delays: Chemical langevin equation¡? format?¿ and linear-noise approximation, Physical Review Letters110, 250601 (2013)

    2013

  96. [104]

    D. J. Gross and M. M´ ezard, The simplest spin glass, Nuclear Physics B240, 431 (1984)

    1984

  97. [105]

    Binder and A

    K. Binder and A. P. Young, Spin glasses: Experimental facts, theoretical concepts, and open questions, Reviews of Modern physics58, 801 (1986)

    1986

  98. [106]

    T. R. Kirkpatrick and D. Thirumalai, p-spin-interaction spin-glass models: Connections with the structural glass problem, Physical Review B36, 5388 (1987)

    1987

  99. [107]

    Castellani and A

    T. Castellani and A. Cavagna, Spin-glass theory for pedestrians, Journal of Statistical Mechanics: Theory and Experiment2005, P05012 (2005)

    2005

  100. [108]

    D. R. Reichman and P. Charbonneau, Mode-coupling theory, Journal of Statistical Mechanics: Theory and Experiment2005, P05013 (2005)

    2005

  101. [109]

    Greenacre, P

    M. Greenacre, P. J. Groenen, T. Hastie, A. I. d’Enza, A. Markos, and E. Tuzhilina, Principal compo- nent analysis, Nature Reviews Methods Primers2, 100 (2022)

    2022

  102. [110]

    L. R. Goldberg, The structure of phenotypic personality traits., American psychologist48, 26 (1993)

    1993

  103. [111]

    Frani´ c, D

    S. Frani´ c, D. Borsboom, C. V. Dolan, and D. I. Boomsma, The big five personality traits: psychological entities or statistical constructs?, Behavior genetics44, 591 (2014)

    2014

  104. [112]

    Van Der Maaten, E

    L. Van Der Maaten, E. O. Postma, H. J. Van Den Herik,et al., Dimensionality reduction: A compar- ative review, Journal of Machine Learning Research10, 1 (2009)

    2009

  105. [113]

    Paul and A

    D. Paul and A. Aue, Random matrix theory in statistics: A review, Journal of Statistical Planning and Inference150, 1 (2014)

    2014

  106. [114]

    V. A. Marˇ cenko and L. A. Pastur, Distribution of eigenvalues for some sets of random matrices, Mathematics of the USSR-Sbornik1, 457 (1967)

    1967

  107. [115]

    Bun, J.-P

    J. Bun, J.-P. Bouchaud, and M. Potters, Cleaning large correlation matrices: tools from random matrix theory, Physics Reports666, 1 (2017)

    2017

  108. [116]

    Potters and J.-P

    M. Potters and J.-P. Bouchaud,A first course in random matrix theory: for physicists, engineers and 219 data scientists(Cambridge University Press, 2020)

    2020

  109. [117]

    Laloux, P

    L. Laloux, P. Cizeau, J.-P. Bouchaud, and M. Potters, Noise dressing of financial correlation matrices, Physical review letters83, 1467 (1999)

    1999

  110. [118]

    Markowitz, Modern portfolio theory, Journal of Finance7, 77 (1952)

    H. Markowitz, Modern portfolio theory, Journal of Finance7, 77 (1952)

    1952

  111. [119]

    H. M. Markowitz,Portfolio selection: efficient diversification of investments(Yale university press, 2008)

    2008

  112. [120]

    H. M. Markowitz, Portfolio theory: as i still see it, Annu. Rev. Financ. Econ.2, 1 (2010)

    2010

  113. [121]

    J. Bun, R. Allez, J.-P. Bouchaud, and M. Potters, Rotational invariant estimator for general noisy matrices, IEEE Transactions on Information Theory62, 7475 (2016)

    2016

  114. [122]

    Ledoit and M

    O. Ledoit and M. Wolf, Spectrum estimation: A unified framework for covariance matrix estimation and pca in large dimensions, Journal of Multivariate Analysis139, 360 (2015)

    2015

  115. [123]

    Ledoit and M

    O. Ledoit and M. Wolf, Nonlinear shrinkage estimation of large-dimensional covariance matrices, The Annals of Statistics40, 1024 (2012)

    2012

  116. [124]

    Ledoit and S

    O. Ledoit and S. P´ ech´ e, Eigenvectors of some large sample covariance matrix ensembles, Probability Theory and Related Fields151, 233 (2011)

    2011

  117. [125]

    F. J. Dyson, A brownian-motion model for the eigenvalues of a random matrix, Journal of Mathemat- ical Physics3, 1191 (1962)

    1962

  118. [126]

    F. J. Dyson, Statistical theory of the energy levels of complex systems. ii, Journal of Mathematical Physics3, 157 (1962)

    1962

  119. [127]

    F. J. Dyson and M. L. Mehta, Statistical theory of the energy levels of complex systems. iv, Journal of Mathematical Physics4, 701 (1963)

    1963

  120. [128]

    M. L. Mehta and F. J. Dyson, Statistical theory of the energy levels of complex systems. v, Journal of Mathematical Physics4, 713 (1963)

    1963

  121. [129]

    Kawabata, K

    K. Kawabata, K. Shiozaki, M. Ueda, and M. Sato, Symmetry and topology in non-hermitian physics, Physical Review X9, 041015 (2019)

    2019

  122. [130]

    R. S. Palais, The classification of real division algebras, The American Mathematical Monthly75, 366 (1968)

    1968

  123. [131]

    Risken, Fokker-planck equation, inThe Fokker-Planck equation: methods of solution and applica- tions(Springer, 1989) pp

    H. Risken, Fokker-planck equation, inThe Fokker-Planck equation: methods of solution and applica- tions(Springer, 1989) pp. 63–95

    1989

  124. [132]

    D. J. Griffiths and D. F. Schroeter,Introduction to quantum mechanics(Cambridge university press, 2018)

    2018

  125. [133]

    Dumitriu and A

    I. Dumitriu and A. Edelman, Matrix models for beta ensembles, Journal of Mathematical Physics43, 5830 (2002)

    2002

  126. [134]

    Allez, J.-P

    R. Allez, J.-P. Bouchaud, and A. Guionnet, Invariant beta ensembles and the gauss-wigner crossover, Physical review letters109, 094102 (2012)

    2012

  127. [135]

    Br´ ezin and A

    E. Br´ ezin and A. Zee, Universality of the correlations between eigenvalues of large random matrices, Nuclear Physics B402, 613 (1993). 220

    1993

  128. [136]

    Erd˝ os and H.-T

    L. Erd˝ os and H.-T. Yau, Universality of local spectral statistics of random matrices, Bulletin of the American Mathematical Society49, 377 (2012)

    2012

  129. [137]

    Stoffregen, J

    U. Stoffregen, J. Stein, H.-J. St¨ ockmann, M. Ku´ s, and F. Haake, Microwave billiards with broken time reversal symmetry, Physical review letters74, 2666 (1995)

    1995

  130. [138]

    Rehemanjiang, M

    A. Rehemanjiang, M. Allgaier, C. Joyner, S. M¨ uller, M. Sieber, U. Kuhl, and H.-J. St¨ ockmann, Microwave realization of the gaussian symplectic ensemble, Physical review letters117, 064101 (2016)

    2016

  131. [139]

    P. So, S. M. Anlage, E. Ott, and R. N. Oerter, Wave chaos experiments with and without time reversal symmetry: Gue and goe statistics, Physical review letters74, 2662 (1995)

    1995

  132. [140]

    S. N. Majumdar, C. Nadal, A. Scardicchio, and P. Vivo, Index distribution of gaussian random ma- trices, Physical review letters103, 220603 (2009)

    2009

  133. [141]

    Cavagna, J

    A. Cavagna, J. P. Garrahan, and I. Giardina, Index distribution of random matrices with an application to disordered systems, Physical Review B61, 3960 (2000)

    2000

  134. [142]

    S. N. Majumdar and G. Schehr, Top eigenvalue of a random matrix: large deviations and third order phase transition, Journal of Statistical Mechanics: Theory and Experiment2014, P01012 (2014)

    2014

  135. [143]

    C. A. Tracy and H. Widom, Level-spacing distributions and the airy kernel, Communications in Mathematical Physics159, 151 (1994)

    1994

  136. [144]

    Ashcroft, N

    N. Ashcroft, N. Mermin,et al., Solid state physics. hrw international editions (1976)

    1976

  137. [145]

    Kittel and P

    C. Kittel and P. McEuen,Introduction to solid state physics(John Wiley & Sons, 2018)

    2018

  138. [146]

    N. F. Mott, The basis of the electron theory of metals, with special reference to the transition metals, Proceedings of the Physical Society. Section A62, 416 (1949)

    1949

  139. [147]

    P. W. Andersonet al., Absence of diffusion in certain random lattices, Physical review109, 1492 (1958)

    1958

  140. [148]

    Chulaevsky and Y

    V. Chulaevsky and Y. Suhov, A brief history of anderson localization, inMulti-scale Analysis for Random Quantum Systems with Interaction(Springer New York, New York, NY, 2014) pp. 3–26

    2014

  141. [149]

    S. F. Edwards and P. W. Anderson, Theory of spin glasses, Journal of Physics F: Metal Physics5, 965 (1975)

    1975

  142. [150]

    Lagendijk, B

    A. Lagendijk, B. v. Tiggelen, and D. S. Wiersma, Fifty years of anderson localization, Physics today 62, 24 (2009)

    2009

  143. [151]

    D. P. Arovas, E. Berg, S. A. Kivelson, and S. Raghu, The hubbard model, Annual review of condensed matter physics13, 239 (2022)

    2022

  144. [152]

    N. C. Wormaldet al., Models of random regular graphs, London mathematical society lecture note series , 239 (1999)

    1999

  145. [153]

    Abou-Chacra, D

    R. Abou-Chacra, D. Thouless, and P. Anderson, A selfconsistent theory of localization, Journal of Physics C: Solid State Physics6, 1734 (1973)

    1973

  146. [154]

    M´ ezard and G

    M. M´ ezard and G. Parisi, The bethe lattice spin glass revisited, The European Physical Journal B-Condensed Matter and Complex Systems20, 217 (2001)

    2001

  147. [155]

    F. L. Metz, I. Neri, and T. Rogers, Spectral theory of sparse non-hermitian random matrices, Journal 221 of Physics A: Mathematical and Theoretical52, 434003 (2019)

    2019

  148. [156]

    J. S. Yedidia, W. T. Freeman, Y. Weiss,et al., Understanding belief propagation and its generaliza- tions, Exploring artificial intelligence in the new millennium8, 0018 (2003)

    2003

  149. [157]

    V. A. Susca, P. Vivo, and R. K¨ uhn, Cavity and replica methods for the spectral density of sparse symmetric random matrices, SciPost Physics Lecture Notes , 033 (2021)

    2021

  150. [158]

    Kesten,Symmetric random walks on groups(Cornell University, 1958)

    H. Kesten,Symmetric random walks on groups(Cornell University, 1958)

    1958

  151. [159]

    B. D. McKay, The expected eigenvalue distribution of a large regular graph, Linear Algebra and its applications40, 203 (1981)

    1981

  152. [160]

    Biroli and R

    G. Biroli and R. Monasson, A single defect approximation for localized states on random lattices, Journal of Physics A: Mathematical and General32, L255 (1999)

    1999

  153. [161]

    Pietracaprina, V

    F. Pietracaprina, V. Ros, and A. Scardicchio, Forward approximation as a mean-field approximation for the anderson and many-body localization transitions, Physical Review B93, 054201 (2016)

    2016

  154. [162]

    Weibull, A statistical theory of strength of materials, IVB-Handl

    W. Weibull, A statistical theory of strength of materials, IVB-Handl. (1939)

    1939

  155. [163]

    Kim and A

    Y. Kim and A. B. Harris, Density of states of the random-hopping model on a cayley tree, Physical Review B31, 7393 (1985)

    1985

  156. [164]

    G. J. Rodgers and A. J. Bray, Density of states of a sparse random matrix, Physical Review B37, 3557 (1988)

    1988

  157. [165]

    Semerjian and L

    G. Semerjian and L. F. Cugliandolo, Sparse random matrices: the eigenvalue spectrum revisited, Journal of Physics A: Mathematical and General35, 4837 (2002)

    2002

  158. [166]

    Lifshitz, Energy spectrum structure and quantum states of disordered condensed systems, Soviet Physics Uspekhi7, 549 (1965)

    I. Lifshitz, Energy spectrum structure and quantum states of disordered condensed systems, Soviet Physics Uspekhi7, 549 (1965)

    1965

  159. [167]

    Khorunzhiy, W

    O. Khorunzhiy, W. Kirsch, and P. M¨ uller, Lifshitz tails for spectra of erd˝ os-r´ enyi random graphs, The Annals of Applied Probability , 295 (2006)

    2006

  160. [168]

    Bapst and G

    V. Bapst and G. Semerjian, Lifshitz tails on the bethe lattice: a combinatorial approach, Journal of Statistical Physics145, 51 (2011)

    2011

  161. [169]

    Biroli, G

    G. Biroli, G. Semerjian, and M. Tarzia, Anderson model on bethe lattices: density of states, localization properties and isolated eigenvalue, Progress of Theoretical Physics Supplement184, 187 (2010)

    2010

  162. [170]

    A. D. Mirlin, Y. V. Fyodorov, F.-M. Dittes, J. Quezada, and T. H. Seligman, Transition from localized to extended eigenstates in the ensemble of power-law random banded matrices, Physical Review E 54, 3221 (1996)

    1996

  163. [171]

    M. R. Zirnbauer, Anderson localization and non-linear sigma model with graded symmetry, Nuclear Physics B265, 375 (1986)

    1986

  164. [172]

    Mirlin and F

    A. Mirlin and F. Evers, Multifractality and critical fluctuations at the anderson transition, Physical Review B62, 7920 (2000)

    2000

  165. [173]

    N. F. Mott and W. Twose, The theory of impurity conduction, Advances in physics10, 107 (1961)

    1961

  166. [174]

    Abrahams, P

    E. Abrahams, P. W. Anderson, D. C. Licciardello, and T. V. Ramakrishnan, Scaling theory of local- ization: Absence of quantum diffusion in two dimensions, Physical Review Letters42, 673 (1979). 222

    1979

  167. [175]

    Slevin and T

    K. Slevin and T. Ohtsuki, Critical exponent for the anderson transition in the three-dimensional orthogonal universality class, New Journal of Physics16, 015012 (2014)

    2014

  168. [176]

    P. P. Poduval and S. Das Sarma, Anderson localization in doped semiconductors, Physical Review B 107, 174204 (2023)

    2023

  169. [177]

    Siegrist, P

    T. Siegrist, P. Jost, H. Volker, M. Woda, P. Merkelbach, C. Schlockermann, and M. Wuttig, Disorder- induced localization in crystalline phase-change materials, Nature materials10, 202 (2011)

    2011

  170. [178]

    T. Ying, Y. Gu, X. Chen, X. Wang, S. Jin, L. Zhao, W. Zhang, and X. Chen, Anderson localization of electrons in single crystals: Li x fe7se8, Science advances2, e1501283 (2016)

    2016

  171. [179]

    Bragaglia, F

    V. Bragaglia, F. Arciprete, W. Zhang, A. M. Mio, E. Zallo, K. Perumal, A. Giussani, S. Cecchi, J. E. Boschker, H. Riechert,et al., Metal-insulator transition driven by vacancy ordering in gesbte phase change materials, Scientific reports6, 23843 (2016)

    2016

  172. [180]

    Segev, Y

    M. Segev, Y. Silberberg, and D. N. Christodoulides, Anderson localization of light, Nature Photonics 7, 197 (2013)

    2013

  173. [181]

    D. H. White, T. A. Haase, D. J. Brown, M. D. Hoogerland, M. S. Najafabadi, J. L. Helm, C. Gies, D. Schumayer, and D. A. Hutchinson, Observation of two-dimensional anderson localisation of ultra- cold atoms, Nature communications11, 4942 (2020)

    2020

  174. [182]

    Roy and D

    S. Roy and D. E. Logan, Fock-space correlations and the origins of many-body localization, Physical Review B101, 134202 (2020)

    2020

  175. [183]

    Tarzia, Many-body localization transition in hilbert space, Physical Review B102, 014208 (2020)

    M. Tarzia, Many-body localization transition in hilbert space, Physical Review B102, 014208 (2020)

    2020

  176. [184]

    D. M. Basko, I. L. Aleiner, and B. L. Altshuler, Metal–insulator transition in a weakly interacting many-electron system with localized single-particle states, Annals of physics321, 1126 (2006)

    2006

  177. [185]

    B. L. Altshuler, Y. Gefen, A. Kamenev, and L. S. Levitov, Quasiparticle lifetime in a finite system: A nonperturbative approach, Physical review letters78, 2803 (1997)

    1997

  178. [186]

    Parameswaran and R

    S. Parameswaran and R. Vasseur, Many-body localization, symmetry and topology, Reports on Progress in Physics81, 082501 (2018)

    2018

  179. [187]

    Smith, A

    J. Smith, A. Lee, P. Richerme, B. Neyenhuis, P. W. Hess, P. Hauke, M. Heyl, D. A. Huse, and C. Monroe, Many-body localization in a quantum simulator with programmable random disorder, Nature Physics12, 907 (2016)

    2016

  180. [188]

    J. Z. Imbrie, On many-body localization for quantum spin chains, Journal of Statistical Physics163, 998 (2016)

    2016

  181. [189]

    J. Z. Imbrie, Diagonalization and many-body localization for a disordered quantum spin chain, Physical review letters117, 027201 (2016)

    2016

  182. [190]

    J.-y. Choi, S. Hild, J. Zeiher, P. Schauß, A. Rubio-Abadal, T. Yefsah, V. Khemani, D. A. Huse, I. Bloch, and C. Gross, Exploring the many-body localization transition in two dimensions, Science 352, 1547 (2016)

    2016

  183. [191]

    Bordia, H

    P. Bordia, H. P. L¨ uschen, S. S. Hodgman, M. Schreiber, I. Bloch, and U. Schneider, Coupling identical one-dimensional many-body localized systems, Physical review letters116, 140401 (2016). 223

    2016

  184. [192]

    Schreiber, S

    M. Schreiber, S. S. Hodgman, P. Bordia, H. P. L¨ uschen, M. H. Fischer, R. Vosk, E. Altman, U. Schnei- der, and I. Bloch, Observation of many-body localization of interacting fermions in a quasirandom optical lattice, Science349, 842 (2015)

    2015

  185. [193]

    Newman,Networks(Oxford university press, 2018)

    M. Newman,Networks(Oxford university press, 2018)

    2018

  186. [194]

    Beel, Google scholar’s ranking algorithm: an introductory overview, (2009)

    J. Beel, Google scholar’s ranking algorithm: an introductory overview, (2009)

    2009

  187. [195]

    Ediger, K

    D. Ediger, K. Jiang, J. Riedy, D. A. Bader, C. Corley, R. Farber, and W. N. Reynolds, Massive social network analysis: Mining twitter for social good, in2010 39th international conference on parallel processing(IEEE, 2010) pp. 583–593

    2010

  188. [196]

    A. J. O’malley and P. V. Marsden, The analysis of social networks, Health services and outcomes research methodology8, 222 (2008)

    2008

  189. [197]

    Pastor-Satorras, C

    R. Pastor-Satorras, C. Castellano, P. Van Mieghem, and A. Vespignani, Epidemic processes in complex networks, Reviews of modern physics87, 925 (2015)

    2015

  190. [198]

    Starnini, F

    M. Starnini, F. Baumann, T. Galla, D. Garcia, G. I˜ niguez, M. Karsai, J. Lorenz, and K. Sznajd-Weron, Opinion dynamics: Statistical physics and beyond, arXiv preprint arXiv:2507.11521 (2025)

    2025 arXiv

  191. [199]

    Pilosof, M

    S. Pilosof, M. A. Porter, M. Pascual, and S. K´ efi, The multilayer nature of ecological networks, Nature ecology & evolution1, 0101 (2017)

    2017

  192. [200]

    Mungan, S

    M. Mungan, S. Sastry, K. Dahmen, and I. Regev, Networks and hierarchies: How amorphous materials learn to remember, Physical review letters123, 178002 (2019)

    2019

  193. [201]

    Akara-pipattana and O

    P. Akara-pipattana and O. Evnin, Random matrices with row constraints and eigenvalue distributions of graph laplacians, Journal of Physics A: Mathematical and Theoretical56, 295001 (2023)

    2023

  194. [202]

    Bordenave and P

    C. Bordenave and P. Caputo, Large deviations of empirical neighborhood distribution in sparse random graphs, Probability Theory and Related Fields163, 149 (2015)

    2015

  195. [203]

    J. W. Baron, Classes of non-gaussian random matrices: Long-range eigenvalue correlations and non- ergodic extended eigenvectors, Europhysics Letters151, 21002 (2025)

    2025

  196. [204]

    L. Tang, Y. Zhou, L. Wang, S. Purkayastha, L. Zhang, J. He, F. Wang, and P. X.-K. Song, A review of multi-compartment infectious disease models, International Statistical Review88, 462 (2020)

    2020

  197. [205]

    D. S. Dean, An approximation scheme for the density of states of the laplacian on random graphs, Journal of Physics A: Mathematical and General35, L153 (2002)

    2002

  198. [206]

    J. W. Baron, Persistent individual bias in a voter model with quenched disorder, Physical Review E 103, 052309 (2021)

    2021

  199. [207]

    Prigogine and R

    I. Prigogine and R. Lefever, Symmetry breaking instabilities in dissipative systems. ii, The Journal of Chemical Physics48, 1695 (1968)

    1968

  200. [208]

    A. M. Zhabotinsky, Belousov-zhabotinsky reaction, Scholarpedia2, 1435 (2007)

    2007

  201. [209]

    R. A. Satnoianu, M. Menzinger, and P. K. Maini, Turing instabilities in general systems, Journal of mathematical biology41, 493 (2000)

    2000

  202. [210]

    Turing, The chemical basis of morphogenesis, Phil Trans R Soc B237, 37 (1952)

    A. Turing, The chemical basis of morphogenesis, Phil Trans R Soc B237, 37 (1952)

    1952

  203. [211]

    J. D. da Silva, D. Tapias, P. Sollich, and F. Metz, Spectral properties, localization transition and 224 multifractal eigenvectors of the laplacian on heterogeneous networks, SciPost Physics18, 047 (2025)

    2025

  204. [212]

    Br´ ezin, C

    E. Br´ ezin, C. Itzykson, G. Parisi, and J.-B. Zuber, Planar diagrams, Communications in Mathematical Physics59, 35 (1978)

    1978

  205. [213]

    J. A. Mingo and R. Speicher,Free probability and random matrices, Vol. 35 (Springer, 2017)

    2017

  206. [214]

    D. Voiculescu, Symmetries of some reduced free product c*-algebras, inOperator Algebras and their Connections with Topology and Ergodic Theory: Proceedings of the OATE Conference held in Bu¸ steni, Romania, Aug. 29–Sept. 9, 1983(Springer, 1983) pp. 556–588

    1983

  207. [215]

    Voiculescu, Limit laws for random matrices and free products, Inventiones mathematicae104, 201 (1991)

    D. Voiculescu, Limit laws for random matrices and free products, Inventiones mathematicae104, 201 (1991)

    1991

  208. [216]

    Voiculescu, Addition of certain non-commuting random variables, Journal of functional analysis 66, 323 (1986)

    D. Voiculescu, Addition of certain non-commuting random variables, Journal of functional analysis 66, 323 (1986)

    1986

  209. [217]

    Voiculescu, Multiplication of certain non-commuting random variables, Journal of Operator Theory , 223 (1987)

    D. Voiculescu, Multiplication of certain non-commuting random variables, Journal of Operator Theory , 223 (1987)

    1987

  210. [218]

    Nica and R

    A. Nica and R. Speicher,Lectures on the combinatorics of free probability, Vol. 13 (Cambridge Uni- versity Press, 2006)

    2006

  211. [219]

    Burda and A

    Z. Burda and A. Swiech, Quaternionicrtransform and non-hermitian random matrices, Phys. Rev. E92, 052111 (2015)

    2015

  212. [220]

    R. A. Janik, M. A. Nowak, G. Papp, J. Wambach, and I. Zahed, Non-hermitian random matrix models: Free random variable approach, Physical Review E55, 4100 (1997)

    1997

  213. [221]

    Burda, R

    Z. Burda, R. Janik, and M. Nowak, Multiplication law and s transform for non-hermitian random matrices, Physical Review E—Statistical, Nonlinear, and Soft Matter Physics84, 061125 (2011)

    2011

  214. [222]

    Kamenev and M

    A. Kamenev and M. M´ ezard, Level correlations in disordered metals: The replicaσmodel, Physical Review B60, 3944 (1999)

    1999

  215. [223]

    Sherrington and S

    D. Sherrington and S. Kirkpatrick, 50 years of spin glass theory, Nature Reviews Physics , 1 (2025)

    2025

  216. [224]

    Verbaarschot and M

    J. Verbaarschot and M. Zirnbauer, Critique of the replica trick, Journal of Physics A: Mathematical and General18, 1093 (1985)

    1985

  217. [225]

    M. R. Zirnbauer, Another critique of the replica trick, arXiv preprint cond-mat/9903338 (1999)

    1999 arXiv

  218. [226]

    Parisi, Infinite number of order parameters for spin-glasses, Physical Review Letters43, 1754 (1979)

    G. Parisi, Infinite number of order parameters for spin-glasses, Physical Review Letters43, 1754 (1979)

    1979

  219. [227]

    Parisi, The order parameter for spin glasses: a function on the interval 0-1, Journal of Physics A: Mathematical and General13, 1101 (1980)

    G. Parisi, The order parameter for spin glasses: a function on the interval 0-1, Journal of Physics A: Mathematical and General13, 1101 (1980)

    1980

  220. [228]

    Parisi, Order parameter for spin-glasses, Physical Review Letters50, 1946 (1983)

    G. Parisi, Order parameter for spin-glasses, Physical Review Letters50, 1946 (1983)

    1946

  221. [229]

    Talagrand, The parisi formula, Annals of mathematics , 221 (2006)

    M. Talagrand, The parisi formula, Annals of mathematics , 221 (2006)

    2006

  222. [230]

    Gradenigo, M

    G. Gradenigo, M. C. Angelini, L. Leuzzi, and F. Ricci-Tersenghi, Solving the spherical p-spin model with the cavity method: equivalence with the replica results, Journal of Statistical Mechanics: Theory and Experiment2020, 113302 (2020)

    2020

  223. [231]

    Franz and F

    S. Franz and F. Tria, A note on the guerra and talagrand theorems for mean field spin glasses: the 225 simple case of spherical models, Journal of statistical physics122, 313 (2006)

    2006

  224. [232]

    J. R. de Almeida and D. J. Thouless, Stability of the sherrington-kirkpatrick solution of a spin glass model, Journal of Physics A: Mathematical and General11, 983 (1978)

    1978

  225. [233]

    Crisanti and H.-J

    A. Crisanti and H.-J. Sommers, The spherical p-spin interaction spin glass model: the statics, Zeitschrift f¨ ur Physik B Condensed Matter87, 341 (1992)

    1992

  226. [234]

    Edwards and M

    S. Edwards and M. Warner, The effect of disorder on the spectrum of a hermitian matrix, Journal of Physics A: Mathematical and General13, 381 (1980)

    1980

  227. [235]

    C. M. Bender and S. A. Orszag,Advanced mathematical methods for scientists and engineers: Asymp- totic methods and perturbation theory, Vol. 1 (Springer, 1999)

    1999

  228. [236]

    Barrat, The p-spin spherical spin glass model, arXiv preprint cond-mat/9701031 (1997)

    A. Barrat, The p-spin spherical spin glass model, arXiv preprint cond-mat/9701031 (1997)

    1997 arXiv

  229. [237]

    Zamponi, Mean field theory of spin glasses, arXiv preprint arXiv:1008.4844 (2010)

    F. Zamponi, Mean field theory of spin glasses, arXiv preprint arXiv:1008.4844 (2010)

    2010 arXiv

  230. [238]

    Patil, F

    N. Patil, F. Aguirre-Lopez, and J.-P. Bouchaud, The spectral boundary of block structured random matrices, Journal of Physics: Complexity (2024)

    2024

  231. [239]

    Agliari, F

    E. Agliari, F. Alemanno, A. Barra, and A. Fachechi, On the marchenko–pastur law in analog bipartite spin-glasses, Journal of Physics A: Mathematical and Theoretical52, 254002 (2019)

    2019

  232. [240]

    Charbonneau, E

    P. Charbonneau, E. Marinari, G. Parisi, F. Ricci-tersenghi, G. Sicuro, F. Zamponi, and M. Mezard, Spin glass theory and far beyond: replica symmetry breaking after 40 years(World Scientific, 2023)

    2023

  233. [241]

    Y. V. Fyodorov, B. A. Khoruzhenko, and H.-J. Sommers, Almost-hermitian random matrices: eigen- value density in the complex plane, Physics Letters A226, 46 (1997)

    1997

  234. [242]

    Y. V. Fyodorov, B. A. Khoruzhenko, and H.-J. Sommers, Almost hermitian random matrices: crossover from wigner-dyson to ginibre eigenvalue statistics, Physical review letters79, 557 (1997)

    1997

  235. [243]

    A. D. Mirlin and Y. V. Fyodorov, Distribution of local densities of states, order parameter function, and critical behavior near the anderson transition, Physical review letters72, 526 (1994)

    1994

  236. [244]

    A. D. Mirlin and Y. V. Fyodorov, Statistical properties of one-point green functions in disordered systems and critical behavior near the anderson transition, Journal de Physique I4, 655 (1994)

    1994

  237. [245]

    Verbaarschot, The supersymmetric method in random matrix theory and applications to qcd, in AIP Conference Proceedings, Vol

    J. Verbaarschot, The supersymmetric method in random matrix theory and applications to qcd, in AIP Conference Proceedings, Vol. 744 (American Institute of Physics, 2004) pp. 277–362

    2004

  238. [246]

    J. A. Zuk, Introduction to the supersymmetry method for the gaussian random-matrix ensembles, arXiv preprint cond-mat/9412060 (1994)

    1994 arXiv

  239. [247]

    Guhr, Supersymmetry in random matrix theory, arXiv preprint arXiv:1005.0979 (2010)

    T. Guhr, Supersymmetry in random matrix theory, arXiv preprint arXiv:1005.0979 (2010)

    2010 arXiv

  240. [248]

    Berazin,The method of second quantization, Vol

    F. Berazin,The method of second quantization, Vol. 24 (Elsevier, 2012)

    2012

  241. [249]

    Y. V. Fyodorov and A. D. Mirlin, On the density of states of sparse random matrices, Journal of Physics A: Mathematical and General24, 2219 (1991)

    1991

  242. [250]

    Verbaarschot, H

    J. Verbaarschot, H. Weidenm¨ uller, and M. Zirnbauer, Grassmann integration in stochastic quantum physics: The case of compound-nucleus scattering, Physics Reports129, 367 (1985)

    1985

  243. [251]

    T. R. W¨ urfel, M. J. Crumpton, and Y. V. Fyodorov, Mean left-right eigenvector self-overlap in the real ginibre ensemble, Random Matrices: Theory and Applications13, 2450017 (2024). 226

    2024

  244. [252]

    J. T. Chalker and B. Mehlig, Eigenvector statistics in non-hermitian random matrix ensembles, Phys- ical review letters81, 3367 (1998)

    1998

  245. [253]

    R. P. Feynman, The principle of least action in quantum mechanics, inFeynman’s thesis—a new approach to quantum theory(World Scientific, 2005) pp. 1–69

    2005

  246. [254]

    R. P. Feynman, Space-time approach to non-relativistic quantum mechanics, Reviews of modern physics20, 367 (1948)

    1948

  247. [255]

    R. P. Feynman, Space-time approach to quantum electrodynamics, Phys. Rev.76, 769 (1949)

    1949

  248. [256]

    Altland and B

    A. Altland and B. D. Simons,Condensed Matter Field Theory(Cambridge University Press, 2010)

    2010

  249. [257]

    Onsager and S

    L. Onsager and S. Machlup, Fluctuations and irreversible processes, Physical Review91, 1505 (1953)

    1953

  250. [258]

    Doi, Second quantization representation for classical many-particle system, Journal of Physics A: Mathematical and General9, 1465 (1976)

    M. Doi, Second quantization representation for classical many-particle system, Journal of Physics A: Mathematical and General9, 1465 (1976)

    1976

  251. [259]

    Peliti, Path integral approach to birth-death processes on a lattice, Journal de Physique46, 1469 (1985)

    L. Peliti, Path integral approach to birth-death processes on a lattice, Journal de Physique46, 1469 (1985)

    1985

  252. [260]

    J. W. Baron and T. Galla, Stochastic fluctuations and quasipattern formation in reaction-diffusion systems with anomalous transport, Physical Review E99, 052124 (2019)

    2019

  253. [261]

    Galla, Generating-functional analysis of random lotka-volterra systems: A step-by-step guide, arXiv preprint arXiv:2405.14289 (2024)

    T. Galla, Generating-functional analysis of random lotka-volterra systems: A step-by-step guide, arXiv preprint arXiv:2405.14289 (2024)

    2024 arXiv

  254. [262]

    J. A. Hertz, Y. Roudi, and P. Sollich, Path integral methods for the dynamics of stochastic and disordered systems, Journal of Physics A: Mathematical and Theoretical50, 033001 (2016)

    2016

  255. [263]

    Altland and A

    A. Altland and A. Kamenev, Wigner-dyson statistics from the keldyshσ-model, Phys. Rev. Lett.85, 5615 (2000)

    2000

  256. [264]

    Kamenev and A

    A. Kamenev and A. Andreev, Electron-electron interactions in disordered metals: Keldysh formalism, Physical Review B60, 2218 (1999)

    1999

  257. [265]

    Kamenev and A

    A. Kamenev and A. Levchenko, Keldysh technique and non-linearσ-model: basic principles and applications, Advances in Physics58, 197 (2009)

    2009

  258. [266]

    Kuczala and T

    A. Kuczala and T. O. Sharpee, Eigenvalue spectra of large correlated random matrices, Physical Review E94, 050101 (2016)

    2016

  259. [267]

    G. ’t Hooft, A planar diagram theory for strong interactions, inThe Large N Expansion In Quantum Field Theory And Statistical Physics: From Spin Systems to 2-Dimensional Gravity(World Scientific,

  260. [268]

    Aguirre-L´ opez, Heterogeneous mean-field analysis of the generalized lotka–volterra model on a network, Journal of Physics A: Mathematical and Theoretical57, 345002 (2024)

    F. Aguirre-L´ opez, Heterogeneous mean-field analysis of the generalized lotka–volterra model on a network, Journal of Physics A: Mathematical and Theoretical57, 345002 (2024)

    2024

  261. [269]

    J. I. Park, D.-S. Lee, S. H. Lee, and H. J. Park, Incorporating heterogeneous interactions for ecological biodiversity, Physical Review Letters133, 198402 (2024)

    2024

  262. [270]

    Poley, T

    L. Poley, T. Galla, and J. W. Baron, Interaction networks in persistent lotka-volterra communities, Physical Review E111, 014318 (2025)

    2025

  263. [271]

    Rogers,New results on the spectral density of random matrices, Ph.D

    T. Rogers,New results on the spectral density of random matrices, Ph.D. thesis, King’s College London 227 (2010)

    2010

  264. [272]

    Livan, M

    G. Livan, M. Novaes, and P. Vivo, Introduction to random matrices theory and practice, Monograph Award63, 914 (2018)

    2018

  265. [273]

    A. M. Mambuca, C. Cammarota, and I. Neri, Dynamical systems on large networks with predator-prey interactions are stable and exhibit oscillations, Physical Review E105, 014305 (2022)

    2022

  266. [274]

    Rogers, C

    T. Rogers, C. P. Vicente, K. Takeda, and I. P. Castillo, Spectral density of random graphs with topological constraints, Journal of Physics A: Mathematical and Theoretical43, 195002 (2010)

    2010

Pith tools

Reviewed July 10, 2026 · model on record in the stance chip above.