Pith. sign in

REVIEW 4 major objections 4 minor 65 references

von K\'arm\'an--Howarth and Corrsin equations closures through Liouville theorem

T0 review · 4 major / 4 minor · reviewed 2026-08-14 · deepseek-v4-flash

Pith's one-line read This paper derives parameter-free, non-diffusive closure formulas for the von Kármán–Howarth and Corrsin equations, showing that the energy cascade is a propagation of correlations at a scale-dependent speed.

desk verdict The new derivation fails because the assumed uniform law for the longitudinal increment contradicts homogeneity; the closure formulas are left as empirical models, not derived results. read the letter →

arxiv 1908.08946 v3 pith:VUN2YTYF submitted 2019-08-23 physics.flu-dyn physics.ao-ph

classification physics.flu-dynphysics.ao-ph PACS 47.27.Gs
keywords homogeneousisotropicturbulencevonKármán-HowarthequationCorrsinclosureproblemLiouvilletheoremenergycascadecorrelationpropagationself-similardecay
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal

The pith

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The reading

This paper aims to close the von Kármán–Howarth and Corrsin equations, the evolution equations for longitudinal velocity and temperature correlations in homogeneous isotropic turbulence, without eddy-viscosity assumptions. Using the Liouville theorem and a statistical-independence hypothesis between the velocity field and the material separation vectors, it derives algebraic formulas that express the triple-correlation transfer terms in terms of the second-order correlations and their gradients. The resulting closures are non-diffusive and parameter-free; they describe the energy cascade as a spatial propagation of correlations at speed $c_T = u\sqrt{(1-f)/2}$. The paper then shows that, under these closures, the Loitsianskii, Saffman–Birkhoff, and Corrsin invariants exist under stated decay conditions, and that self-similar decay can be described by the fluctuating intensities and correlation scales alone. A sympathetic reader would care because the derivation offers a first-principles route to closing two central equations of turbulence theory, free of fitted constants.

What carries the argument

The load-bearing machinery is the factorization $P=F\,P_\xi$ of the joint distribution into a velocity–temperature part and a material-separation part, together with the Liouville equation for $P_\xi$. With the separation vector concentrated on the sphere $|\xi|=r$ by the strongly peaked distribution (13), the longitudinal velocity difference $U=\dot\xi\cdot\xi/\xi$ is argued to be uniformly distributed on $(-U_S/2,\,U_S)$ (Eq. 26), giving $\langle U\rangle_\xi = \tfrac{1}{2}\sqrt{\langle U^2\rangle_\xi}$. That identity, combined with $\langle U^2\rangle_\xi=2u^2(1-f)$, converts the transfer terms into the closure formulas (46). The paper's claimed novelty is the exact relation (32) connecting spatial correlations computed with the velocity distribution function to those computed with the separation-line distribution function.

What would settle it

Measure the probability density of the longitudinal velocity increment at a fixed separation $r$ in high-Reynolds-number homogeneous isotropic turbulence, in an experiment or a direct numerical simulation. If the pdf is not flat over its support, or if $\langle U\rangle \neq \tfrac{1}{2}\sqrt{\langle U^2\rangle}$, then the closure formulas (46) fail quantitatively.

Watch

Extended reading notes

Core claim

On the paper's own terms, the central discovery is that the two unclosed transfer terms in the von Kármán–Howarth and Corrsin equations can be written exactly as $K(r)=u^3\sqrt{(1-f)/2}\,\partial f/\partial r$ and $G(r)=u\theta^2\sqrt{(1-f)/2}\,\partial f_\theta/\partial r$, where $f$ and $f_\theta$ are the longitudinal velocity and temperature correlations and $u$ and $\theta$ are their r.m.s. fluctuations. These formulas are derived, not postulated, from the Liouville equation for the joint distribution of velocity, temperature, and material separation, under the hypotheses of full statistical independence of the rapidly fluctuating separation vectors from the velocity and temperature fields, together with homogeneity, isotropy, and incompressibility. They contain no empirical constants and no second derivatives of the correlations, so the cascade is not a diffusion process but a wave-like spatial propagation with local speed $c_T = u\sqrt{(1-f)/2}$. The paper further claims that these closures reproduce the negative skewness of velocity differences, Kolmogorov's law, and scalar spectra, and that they lead to clean conditions for the Loitsianskii and Saffman–Birkhoff invariants.

Load-bearing premise

The load-bearing premise is that, for each fixed separation distance, the longitudinal velocity difference has a flat probability distribution over its possible range, which produces the factor $1/2$ entering the closure formulas; if actual increment distributions are not flat, the central formulas fail.

Editorial extensions

If this is right

  • The von Kármán–Howarth and Corrsin equations become closed partial differential equations with no free empirical constants.
  • The energy cascade is reinterpreted as a spatial propagation of correlations at scale-dependent speed $c_T=u\sqrt{(1-f)/2}$, rather than as a diffusive process.
  • The longitudinal velocity-difference skewness is fixed at $H_3(0)=-3/7$, which the paper reports as being in good agreement with prior measurements and simulations.
  • Under self-similarity and the invariant conditions, decay reduces to ordinary differential equations for $u$, $\lambda_T$, $\theta$, and $\lambda_\theta$, giving explicit power laws such as $u^2\propto (1+4\nu t/\lambda_T^2(0))^{-5/2}$ when the Loitsianskii invariant holds.
  • The same closures imply Kolmogorov-like inertial-range behavior and scalar spectra consistent with Kolmogorov, Obukhov–Corrsin, and Batchelor scalings.

Reading between the lines

Editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • Editorial inference: the same Liouville-based route, if valid, should in principle produce analogous closures for anisotropic or inhomogeneous two-point statistics whenever a separation-vector distribution can be defined; the paper explicitly restricts itself to homogeneous isotropic turbulence.
  • Editorial inference: the flat-distribution assumption (26) is directly testable against measured or simulated probability densities of longitudinal velocity increments at fixed separations; a non-flat pdf would change the factor $1/2$ and hence shift every prediction quantitatively.
  • Editorial inference: if the equivalence (32) holds, surface-averaged second-order structure functions computed on spheres of radius $r$ must equal ensemble-averaged ones in fully developed isotropic turbulence, a quantitative prediction that simulations could check.
  • Editorial inference: the closure's success at reproducing known inertial-range results suggests it might also apply to other transported passive scalars, with the same square-root factor carried by the relevant correlation.
Share X Bluesky LinkedIn Reddit HN

Signed reviews

No signed human review yet.

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, and a circularity audit.

Referee Report

4 major / 4 minor

Summary. The manuscript claims to close the von Kármán–Howarth and Corrsin equations for homogeneous isotropic turbulence using the Liouville theorem together with an assumed statistical independence between the velocity/temperature fields and the material separation vector. It derives non-diffusive closure formulas, Eqs. (46), in which the triple correlations are expressed as products of the longitudinal correlation gradient and a scale-dependent propagation speed c_T = u sqrt((1-f)/2). The paper also analyzes Loitsianskii, Saffman–Birkhoff, and Corrsin invariants and the corresponding decay laws. The central derivation rests on the uniform distribution of the longitudinal velocity increment U, Eq. (26), and on the factorization P = F P_xi, Eq. (12).

Significance. If correct, the result would be significant: it would provide parameter-free, non-diffusive closures for the two classic two-point correlation equations, with testable consequences for the energy cascade and for invariant-based decay laws. The manuscript is clearly organized, states its assumptions explicitly, and the algebraic passage from Eq. (38) to Eq. (46) is internally consistent. However, the derivation fails at a load-bearing point: the assumed uniform law for U contradicts the definition of U together with homogeneity, and the closure formulas are essentially a restatement of that unsupported distributional ansatz. Because the central claim rests on this inconsistency, the paper cannot be accepted in its present form.

major comments (4)
  1. [Section 3, Eqs. (26)-(27)] The uniform distribution of U contradicts the definition of U in Eq. (10) together with the homogeneity hypothesis. U is the longitudinal velocity increment (u(t,x+xi)-u(t,x))·xi/|xi|. Under homogeneity, the expectation of u(t,x+xi) with respect to F equals the expectation of u(t,x), so <U> = 0 for every fixed xi, and therefore also after averaging with P_xi. Equation (27) instead gives <U>_xi = (1/2) sqrt(<U^2>_xi) > 0 whenever f(r) < 1. Thus Eq. (26) is not a consequence of isotropy and incompressibility; isotropy makes the direction xi/|xi| uniform on the sphere, not the amplitude U uniform. Since the closure (46) is linear in <U>_xi through Eq. (44), replacing the unjustified coefficient 1/2 with the homogeneity-required value 0 would give K = G = 0. This is an internal inconsistency, not merely a disagreement with empirical turbulence phenomenology.
  2. [Section 3, Eqs. (17)-(24)] The derivation of the support (-U_S/2, U_S) does not justify uniformity. Equation (17) asserts <dV/dt>_xi = 0 for finite separation vectors, but incompressibility only guarantees dV/dt = 0 in the infinitesimal-volume limit, not for finite xi; the representation in Eq. (20) with Ak and epsilon is itself an additional ansatz. Even if the proposed interval were accepted, a bounded support does not imply a flat distribution on that interval, so the argument does not establish Eq. (26).
  3. [Section 5, Eqs. (44)-(46)] The closure formula is algebraically forced by the uniform ansatz rather than derived from independent statistical principles. Substituting Eq. (45) into Eq. (27) converts Eq. (44) into Eq. (46); the square-root factor (1-f)/2 is exactly the content of the assumed uniform distribution. The paper offers no benchmark, consistency test, or independent argument that would distinguish this distribution from other laws with the same second moment, so the claimed proof from Liouville's theorem and statistical independence is not established.
  4. [Section 3, Eq. (12)] The factorization P = F P_xi is asserted as the crucial hypothesis of fully developed turbulence, but no argument is given for the statistical independence of xi from u and theta. Since this assumption is load-bearing for Eqs. (38)-(43), the statement in the Introduction and Conclusion that the present proof is 'more general and rigorous' than the earlier Lyapunov-based derivations is unsupported; the present derivation swaps one unproven ansatz for another.
minor comments (4)
  1. [Abstract and Introduction] The phrase 'exact relationship' used for Eq. (32) overstates the status of that relation, since it is obtained only under the delta-distribution model (13) and the fully developed chaos hypothesis.
  2. [Throughout] There are several typographical issues, including 'litarature' in the Introduction and the malformed email address 'nicola.dedivitiis@uni roma1.it'.
  3. [Section 5, Eq. (48)] The skewness H3 is said to be in agreement with literature data, but no comparison plot or quantitative benchmark is shown in this manuscript; the reader is referred to previous works, which limits the self-containedness of the validation claim.
  4. [Section 6, Eqs. (53)-(55)] The asymptotic conditions m > 4, n > 2, and m > 2 are stated as conditions for invariance, but the interplay with the arbitrary constants c_u and c_theta in Eq. (52) is only sketched; a more explicit derivation of the boundary-term vanishing would improve clarity.

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged · score 2.0 of 10

The closure formula (46) is derived from the paper's stated statistical assumptions rather than from a circular use of the target; the uniform-law step (26) is unsupported but is an assumption, not a circular reduction. Self-citations are corroborative, not load-bearing.

full rationale

The derivation chain is: statistical independence (12) and the peaked isotropic Pxi (13) lead through the Liouville equation to Eqs. (38)-(44), which express K and G as u^2(df/dr)<U>_xi and theta^2(df_theta/dr)<U>_xi. The closure (46) is then obtained by inserting Eq. (45) into the assumed uniform-distribution relation (27). Algebraically, Eq. (46) follows from Eqs. (44), (45), and (27) by construction, but this is a derivation from stated assumptions; Eqs. (46) are not fed back into the definition of U or of Pxi. The genuinely weak step is Section 3: the assertion that U is uniformly distributed on (-U_S/2, U_S), and hence that <U>_xi = (1/2) sqrt(<U^2>_xi), is not a consequence of isotropy or incompressibility and is in tension with homogeneity, which would give <U> = 0. This is a correctness risk and makes the claim of a rigorous derivation from the Liouville theorem doubtful, but it is an unsupported closure hypothesis rather than a circular reduction. The many citations to the author's own prior works [29-31,45,57,59] are used to assert that the same formulas were previously derived and validated; the present derivation does not rely on those citations, so the self-citation is not load-bearing. Accordingly, no significant circularity is identified.

Assumptions & free parameters 0 free parameters · 6 assumptions · 0 invented entities

No free parameters appear in the final closure; instead, the derivation imports several unproven statistical assumptions. The most consequential is the uniform distribution of the longitudinal velocity increment U, which fixes the coefficient sqrt((1-f)/2). The factorization and delta-spike P_xi are additional strong assumptions. No new physical entities are introduced.

assumptions (6)
  • domain assumption P(t,u,theta,x,xi) factorizes as F(t,u,theta) P_xi(t,x,xi) (Eq 12)
    The paper calls this the crucial point of fully developed turbulence; statistical independence of material separation from velocity and temperature fields is assumed, not derived.
  • ad hoc to paper P_xi is a Dirac delta concentrated on |xi|=r: P_xi = (1/(4 pi r^2)) delta(xi-r) (Eq 13)
    Separation vectors are forced to lie exactly on a sphere of radius r at every instant; this is a modeling ansatz not implied by the dynamics.
  • ad hoc to paper The longitudinal velocity difference U is uniformly distributed on (-US/2, US) (Eq 26)
    Uniformity is asserted from isotropy and incompressibility, but isotropy alone gives an arcsine-type distribution for a directional component; no evidence supports uniformity.
  • domain assumption Navier-Stokes dynamics can be reduced to a finite-dimensional manifold so that Ruelle-Takens bifurcation theory applies (Section 2)
    The paper invokes Ref [49] to justify treating the infinite-dimensional velocity space as finite-dimensional; this is a major reduction.
  • domain assumption Time scales of xi are completely separated from those of u and theta, so xi and (u, theta) are statistically uncorrelated (Section 2)
    This separation underlies the factorization and the claim that K and G arise only from the P_xi rate; it is not proven in this paper.
  • standard math Standard calculus of Dirac delta distributions, including Eq (68) integration by parts
    The Appendix states standard distributional identities used in the derivation.

how reviews work

0 comments
Cite this review

Pith. "Pith review of von K\'arm\'an--Howarth and Corrsin equations closures through Liouville theorem." pith.science (2026). https://pith.science/paper/VUN2YTYF

@misc{pith2026190808946,
  author       = {Pith},
  title        = {Pith review of: von K\'arm\'an--Howarth and Corrsin equations closures through Liouville theorem},
  year         = {2026},
  howpublished = {\url{https://pith.science/paper/VUN2YTYF}},
  note         = {Machine review of arXiv:1908.08946}
}
read the original abstract

In this communication, the closure formulas of von K\'arm\'an--Howarth and Corrsin equations are obtained through the Liouville theorem and the hypothesis of homogeneous isotropic incompressible turbulence. Such closures, based on the concept that, in fully developed turbulence, contiguous fluid particles trajectories continuously diverge, are of non--diffusive nature, and express a correlations spatial propagation phenomenon between the several scales which occurs with a propagation speed depending on length scale and velocity standard deviation. These closure formulas coincide with those just obtained in previous works through the finite scale Lyapunov analysis of the fluid act of motion. Here, unlike the other articles, the present study does not use the Lyapunov theory, and provides the closures showing first an exact relationship between the pair spatial correlations calculated with the velocity distribution function and those obtained using the material separation line distribution function. As this analysis does not adopt the Lyapunov theory, this does not need the definition and/or the existence of the Lyapunov exponents. Accordingly, the present proof of the closures results to be more general and rigorous than that presented in the other works, corroborating the previous results. Finally, the conditions of existence of invariants in isotropic turbulence are studied by means of the proposed closures. In the presence of such invariants and self--similarity, the sole evolution of velocity and temperature standard deviations and of the correlation scales is shown to be adequate to fairly describe the isotropic turbulence.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 1908.08946 by the authors.

Figure 1
Figure 1. Scheme of the proposed analysis. rate of separation lines distribution function, where the latter is formally expressed by means of the Liouville theorem. Hence, the present analysis does not require the Lyapunov theory and results to be more general and rigorous than the formulations presented in [29, 30, 31, 45], showing that the Lyapunov theory is a sufficient analytical tool for achieving the same formulas, corr… view at source ↗

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

65 extracted references · 41 canonical work pages

  1. [1]

    , On the Statistical Theory of Isotropic Turbulence., Proc

    von K ´arm´an, T., Howarth, L. , On the Statistical Theory of Isotropic Turbulence., Proc. Roy. Soc. A, 164, 14, 192, (1938)

  2. [2]

    , The Theory of Homogeneous Turbulence

    Batchelor, G.K. , The Theory of Homogeneous Turbulence . Cam- bridge University Press, Cambridge, (1953)

  3. [3]

    , The Decay of Isotropic Temperature Fluctuations in an Isotropic Turbulence, Journal of Aeronautical Science, 18, pp

    Corrsin S. , The Decay of Isotropic Temperature Fluctuations in an Isotropic Turbulence, Journal of Aeronautical Science, 18, pp. 417–423, no. 12, (1951)

  4. [4]

    , On the Spectrum of Isotropic Temperature Fluctuations in an Isotropic Turbulence, Journal of Applied Physics , 22, pp

    Corrsin S. , On the Spectrum of Isotropic Temperature Fluctuations in an Isotropic Turbulence, Journal of Applied Physics , 22, pp. 469– 473, no. 4, (1951), DOI: 10.1063/1.1699986

  5. [5]

    Eyink G. L. & Sreenivasan K.R. , Onsager and the theory of hydrodynamic turbulence, Rev. Mod. Phys. , 78, 87-135, (2006)

  6. [6]

    , On the distribution of energy in the spectrum of turbulent flow., Dokl

    Obukhov A.M. , On the distribution of energy in the spectrum of turbulent flow., Dokl. Akad. Nauk CCCP , 32, (1941), pp. 22–24

  7. [7]

    , Zur statistischen Theorie der Turbulenz, Z

    Heisenberg W. , Zur statistischen Theorie der Turbulenz, Z. Physik , 124, (1948), pp. 628–657

  8. [8]

    Aero- naut

    Kovasznay L.S., Spectrum of Locally Isotropic Turbulence, J. Aero- naut. Sci. , 15, (1948), pp. 745–753

Show all 65 references
  1. [9]

    Ellison T.H., Zur The Universal Small-Scale Spectrum of Turbulence at High Reynolds Number, in Mecanique de la turbulence, Colloque international, Marseilles, Paris, CNRS , 113–121, (1961)

  2. [10]

    Pao Y. H. , Structure of turbulent velocity and scalar fields at large wave numbers, Physics of Fluids , 8, (1965), 1063. 24

  3. [11]

    , Diffusion Approximation to Inertial Energy Transfer in Isotropic Turbulence, Phys

    Leith C. , Diffusion Approximation to Inertial Energy Transfer in Isotropic Turbulence, Phys. Fluids , 10, pp. 1409–1416, (1967), http://dx.doi.org/10.1063/1.1762300

  4. [12]

    , Symmetries and the approach to statistical equilibrium in isotropic turbulence, Physics of Fluids , 31, 2395–2397, (1998)

    Clark T.T, Zemach C. , Symmetries and the approach to statistical equilibrium in isotropic turbulence, Physics of Fluids , 31, 2395–2397, (1998)

  5. [13]

    and Nazarenko S

    Connaughton C. and Nazarenko S. , Warm cascades and anoma- lous scaling in a diffusion model of turbulence, Phys. Rev. Letters , 92, 4, (2004), DOI:https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevLett.92.044501

  6. [14]

    , Reassessment of the classical turbilence closures: the Leith diffusion model., J

    Clark T.T, Rubinstein R., Weinstock J. , Reassessment of the classical turbilence closures: the Leith diffusion model., J. Turbul. , 10(35), 1–23, (2009)

  7. [15]

    , Zur Deutung der dreifachen Geschwindigkeitskorre- lationen der isotropen Turbulenz, Dtsch

    Hasselmann K. , Zur Deutung der dreifachen Geschwindigkeitskorre- lationen der isotropen Turbulenz, Dtsch. Hydrogr. Z, 11, 5, 207-217, (1958)

  8. [16]

    , Isotropic turbulence in the field of turbulent viscosity, JETP Lett., 8, 406–411, (1969)

    Millionshtchikov M. , Isotropic turbulence in the field of turbulent viscosity, JETP Lett., 8, 406–411, (1969)

  9. [17]

    , Closure of the two-point correlation equa- tion as a basis for Reynolds stress models, Appl

    Oberlack M., Peters N. , Closure of the two-point correlation equa- tion as a basis for Reynolds stress models, Appl. Sci. Res. , 51, 533–539, (1993)

  10. [18]

    Baev M. K. & Chernykh G. G. , On Corrsin equation closure, Journal of Engineering Thermophysics , 19, pp. 154–169, no. 3, (2010), DOI: 10.1134/S1810232810030069

  11. [19]

    , Group analysis of the von K´ arm´ an- Howarth equation

    Khabirov S.V., Unal G. , Group analysis of the von K´ arm´ an- Howarth equation. Part I. Submodels., Communications in Nonlinear Science and Numerical Simulation. 7, 3, 18, 2002

  12. [20]

    , Group analysis of the von K´ arm´ an- Howarth equation

    Khabirov S.V., Unal G. , Group analysis of the von K´ arm´ an- Howarth equation. Part II. Physical invariant solutions, Communica- tions in Nonlinear Science and Numerical Simulation. 7, 19, 30, 2002

  13. [21]

    A., Mellor G

    Domaradzki J. A., Mellor G. L. , A simple turbulence closure hypothesis for the triple-velocity correlation functions in homogen eous isotropic turbulence, Jour. of Fluid Mech. , 140, 45–61, (1984). 25

  14. [22]

    , On a model equation for probability density in semi- empirical turbulence transfer theory

    Onufriev, A. , On a model equation for probability density in semi- empirical turbulence transfer theory. In: The Notes on Turbulen ce. Nauka, Moscow, (1994)

  15. [23]

    A Chorin-Type Formula for Solu- tions to a Closure Model for the von K´ arm´ an-Howarth Equation, J

    Grebenev V.N., Oberlack M. A Chorin-Type Formula for Solu- tions to a Closure Model for the von K´ arm´ an-Howarth Equation, J. Nonlinear Math. Phys. , 12, 1, 19, (2005)

  16. [24]

    A Geometric Interpretation of the Second-Order Structure Function Arising in Turbulence, Mathematical Physics, Analysis and Geometry , 12, 1, 1-18, (2009)

    Grebenev V.N., Oberlack M. A Geometric Interpretation of the Second-Order Structure Function Arising in Turbulence, Mathematical Physics, Analysis and Geometry , 12, 1, 1-18, (2009)

  17. [25]

    A., Danaila L., and Djenidi L

    Thiesset F., Antonia R. A., Danaila L., and Djenidi L. , K´ arm´ an–Howarth closure equation on the basis of a universal ed dy viscosity, Phys. Rev. E , 88, 011003(R), (2013), doi: 10.1103/Phys- RevE.88.011003

  18. [26]

    George W. K. , A theory for the self-preservation of temperature fluctuations in isotropic turbulence. Technical Report 117, Turbu lence Research Laboratory, January (1988)

  19. [27]

    George W. K. , ”Self-preservation of temperature fluctuations in isotropic turbulence,” in Studies in Turbulence, Springer, Berlin, (1992)

  20. [28]

    A., Smalley R

    Antonia R. A., Smalley R. J., Zhou T., Anselmet F., Danaila L. , Similarity solution of temperature structure functions in decaying homogeneous isotropic turbulence, Phys. Rev. E , 69, 016305, (2004), DOI: 10.1103/PhysRevE.69.016305

  21. [29]

    , Lyapunov Analysis for Fully Developed Homogeneous Isotropic Turbulence, Theoretical and Computational Fluid Dynamics , (2011), DOI: 10.1007/s00162-010-0211-9

    de Divitiis, N. , Lyapunov Analysis for Fully Developed Homogeneous Isotropic Turbulence, Theoretical and Computational Fluid Dynamics , (2011), DOI: 10.1007/s00162-010-0211-9

  22. [30]

    , Finite Scale Lyapunov Analysis of Temperature Fluc- tuations in Homogeneous Isotropic Turbulence, Appl

    de Divitiis, N. , Finite Scale Lyapunov Analysis of Temperature Fluc- tuations in Homogeneous Isotropic Turbulence, Appl. Math. Modell. , (2014), DOI: 10.1016/j.apm.2014.04.016

  23. [31]

    , von K´ arm´ an–Howarth and Corrsin equations clo- sure based on Lagrangian description of the fluid motion, An- nals of Physics , vol

    de Divitiis N. , von K´ arm´ an–Howarth and Corrsin equations clo- sure based on Lagrangian description of the fluid motion, An- nals of Physics , vol. 368, May 2016, Pages 296-309, (2016), DOI: 10.1016/j.aop.2016.02.010. 26

  24. [32]

    , On sta- tistical correlations between velocity increments and locally averag ed dissipation in homogeneous turbulence, Phys

    Chen S., Doolen G.D., Kraichnan R.H., She Z-S. , On sta- tistical correlations between velocity increments and locally averag ed dissipation in homogeneous turbulence, Phys. Fluids A , 5, pp. 458–463, (1992)

  25. [33]

    , Numerical simulation of three- dimensional homogeneous isotropic turbulence., Phys

    Orszag S.A., Patterson G.S. , Numerical simulation of three- dimensional homogeneous isotropic turbulence., Phys. Rev. Lett. , 28, 76–79, (1972)

  26. [34]

    Orszag S.A., Yakhot V

    Panda R., Sonnad V., Clementi E. Orszag S.A., Yakhot V. , Turbulence in a randomly stirred fluid, Phys. Fluids A , 1(6), 1045– 1053, (1989)

  27. [35]

    , Effects of the similarity model in finite-difference LES of isotropic turbulence using a lagrangian dyna mic mixed model, Flow Turbul

    Anderson R., Meneveau C. , Effects of the similarity model in finite-difference LES of isotropic turbulence using a lagrangian dyna mic mixed model, Flow Turbul. Combust. , 62, pp. 201–225, (1999)

  28. [36]

    , On the representation of backscat- ter in dynamic localization models, Phys

    Carati D., Ghosal S., Moin P. , On the representation of backscat- ter in dynamic localization models, Phys. Fluids , 7(3), pp. 606–616, (1995)

  29. [37]

    , Decaying turbulence in an active–gridgenerated flow and comparisons with large–eddy simu la- tion., J

    Kang H.S., Chester S., Meneveau C. , Decaying turbulence in an active–gridgenerated flow and comparisons with large–eddy simu la- tion., J. Fluid Mech. 480, pp. 129–160, (2003)

  30. [38]

    Batchelor, G. K. , Small-scale variation of convected quantities like temperature in turbulent fluid. Part 1. General discussion and the case of small conductivity, Journal of Fluid Mechanics , 5, (1959), pp. 113– 133

  31. [39]

    K., Howells I

    Batchelor G. K., Howells I. D., Townsend A. A. , Small-scale variation of convected quantities like temperature in turbulent fluid . Part 2. The case of large conductivity, Journal of Fluid Mechanics , 5, (1959), pp. 134–139

  32. [40]

    Obukhov, A. M. , The structure of the temperature field in a turbu- lent flow. Dokl. Akad. Nauk. , CCCP, 39, (1949), pp. 391

  33. [41]

    H., Schwarz W

    Gibson, C. H., Schwarz W. H. , The Universal Equilibrium Spectra of Turbulent Velocity and Scalar Fields, Journal of Fluid Mechanics , 16, (1963), pp. 365–384 27

  34. [42]

    , Passive scalar statistics in high- P´ eclet-number grid turbulence, Journal of Fluid Mechanics , 358, (1998), pp

    Mydlarski, L., W arhaft, Z. , Passive scalar statistics in high- P´ eclet-number grid turbulence, Journal of Fluid Mechanics , 358, (1998), pp. 135–175

  35. [43]

    M., Rogallo R

    Chasnov, J., Canuto V. M., Rogallo R. S. , Turbulence spec- trum of strongly conductive temperature field in a rapidly stirred flu id. Phys. Fluids A , 1, pp. 1698-1700, (1989), doi:10.1063/1.857535

  36. [44]

    A., Sreenivasan K

    Donzis D. A., Sreenivasan K. R., Yeung P. K. , The Batchelor Spectrum for Mixing of Passive Scalars in Isotropic Turbulence, Flow, Turbulence and Combustion , 85, pp. 549–566, no. 3–4, (2010), DOI: 10.1007/s10494-010-9271-6

  37. [45]

    , Statistical Lyapunov theory based on bifurcation anal- ysis of energy cascade in isotropic homogeneous turbulence: a phy sical– mathematical review, Entropy, vol

    de Divitiis N. , Statistical Lyapunov theory based on bifurcation anal- ysis of energy cascade in isotropic homogeneous turbulence: a phy sical– mathematical review, Entropy, vol. 21, issue 5, p. 520, 2019, DOI: 10.3390/e21050520

  38. [46]

    Loitsianskii, L. G. , Einige Grundgesetze einer isotropen turbulenten Stromung., Arbeiten d. Zentr. Aero-Hydrdyn , 440 (1939)

  39. [47]

    Saffman, P. G. , The large-scale structure of homogeneous turbu- lence. Journal of Fluid Mechanics , 27(3), 581-593. (1967)

  40. [48]

    An Informal Conceptual Introduction to Turbulence: Second Edition of An Informal Introduction to Turbulence , Springer Science & Business Media, (2009)

    Tsinober, A. An Informal Conceptual Introduction to Turbulence: Second Edition of An Informal Introduction to Turbulence , Springer Science & Business Media, (2009)

  41. [49]

    , Commun

    Ruelle, D., Takens, F. , Commun. Math Phys. 20, 167, (1971)

  42. [50]

    , Roads to turbulence in dissipative dynamical systems Rev

    Eckmann, J.P. , Roads to turbulence in dissipative dynamical systems Rev. Mod. Phys. 53, 643–654, (1981)

  43. [51]

    , Nonlinear Oscillations, Dynamical Systems, and Bifurcations of Vector Fields

    Guckenheimer, J., Holmes, P. , Nonlinear Oscillations, Dynamical Systems, and Bifurcations of Vector Fields . Springer, (1990)

  44. [52]

    , Bifurcations analysis of turbulent energy cascade, Annals of Physics , (2015), DOI: 10.1016/j.aop.2015.01.017

    de Divitiis N. , Bifurcations analysis of turbulent energy cascade, Annals of Physics , (2015), DOI: 10.1016/j.aop.2015.01.017

  45. [53]

    Ottino, J. M. The kinematics of mixing: stretching, chaos, and transport, Cambridge Texts in Applied Mathematics, New York, (1989). 28

  46. [54]

    Ottino, J. M. , Mixing, Chaotic Advection, and Turbulence., Annu. Rev. Fluid Mech. 22, 207–253, (1990)

  47. [55]

    , Introduction to nonlinear science , Cambridge University Press, (1995)

    Nicolis, G. , Introduction to nonlinear science , Cambridge University Press, (1995)

  48. [56]

    , 10.1002/mma.5886

    Wei, Yunfeng & Chen, Caisheng & Chen, Qiang & Yang, Hongwei., Liouville–type theorem for nonlinear elliptic equations in- volving p –Laplace–type Grushin operators., Mathematical Methods in the Applied Sciences. , 10.1002/mma.5886

  49. [57]

    , Statistics of finite scale local Lyapunov exponents in fully developed homogeneous isotropic turbulence, Advances in Math- ematical Physics , vol

    de Divitiis N. , Statistics of finite scale local Lyapunov exponents in fully developed homogeneous isotropic turbulence, Advances in Math- ematical Physics , vol. 2018, Article ID 2365602, 12 pages, (2018), https://doi.org/10.1155/2018/2365602

  50. [58]

    , Geometric Measure Theory , Springer–Verlag, 1969

    Federer, H. , Geometric Measure Theory , Springer–Verlag, 1969

  51. [59]

    de Divitiis, N. , Self-Similarity in Fully Developed Homogeneous Isotropic Turbulence Using the Lyapunov Analysis, Theoretical and Computational Fluid Dynamics , (2012), DOI: 10.1007/s00162-010- 0213-7

  52. [60]

    , The Principles of Quantum Mechanics (4th ed.), Oxford at the Clarendon Press, ISBN 978-0-19-852011-5

    Dirac P. , The Principles of Quantum Mechanics (4th ed.), Oxford at the Clarendon Press, ISBN 978-0-19-852011-5

  53. [61]

    , The Fourier Transform and Its Applications (2nd ed.), McGraw-Hill

    Bracewell R. , The Fourier Transform and Its Applications (2nd ed.), McGraw-Hill

  54. [62]

    B., Weber H

    Arfken G. B., Weber H. J. , Mathematical Methods for Physicists (5th ed.), Boston, Massachusetts: Academic Press, ISBN 978-0 -12- 059825-0

  55. [63]

    D., Lifshitz, M , Fluid Mechanics

    Landau, L. D., Lifshitz, M , Fluid Mechanics . Pergamon London, England, 1959

  56. [64]

    Proudman, I., & Reid, W. H. , On the decay of a normally dis- tributed and homogeneous turbulent velocity field, Phil. Trans. R. Soc. Lond., A 247(926), 163–189. (1954). 29

  57. [65]

    K., & Proudman, I

    Batchelor, G. K., & Proudman, I. , The large-scale structure of homogeneous turbulence. Phil. Trans. R. Soc. Lond. , A 248(949), 369–

Pith tools

Reviewed August 14, 2026 · model on record in the stance chip above.