Pith. sign in

REVIEW 2 cited by

Precision modelling of the matter power spectrum in a Planck-like Universe

Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.

This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.

SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event

T0 review · schema-true

One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.

pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp

arxiv 1807.00040 v2 pith:VV3ECEHH submitted 2018-06-29 astro-ph.CO

classification astro-ph.CO
keywords omegamodelpowerspectrummatterparameterssimulationsalpha
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal

Signed reviews

No signed human review yet.

0 comments
abstract

We use a suite of high-resolution $N$-body simulations and state-of-the-art perturbation theory to improve the code halofit, which predicts the nonlinear matter power spectrum. We restrict attention to parameters in the vicinity of the Planck Collaboration's best fit. On large-scales ($k\lesssim 0.07 h/{\rm Mpc}$), our model evaluates the 2-loop calculation from the Multi-point Propagator Theory of Bernardeau et al.(2012). On smaller scales ($k \gtrsim 0.7 h/{\rm Mpc}$), we transition to a smoothing-spline-fit model, that characterises the differences between the Takahashi et al. (2012) recalibration of halofit2012 and our simulations. We use an additional suite of simulations to explore the response of the power spectrum to variations in the cosmological parameters. In particular, we examine: the time evolution of the dark energy equation of state ($w_0$, $w_a$); the matter density $\Omega_m$; the physical densities of CDM and baryons $(\omega_c,\omega_b)$; and the primordial power spectrum amplitude $A_s$, spectral index $n_s$, and its running $\alpha$. We construct correction functions, which improve halofit's dependence on cosmological parameters. Our newly calibrated model reproduces all of our data with $\lesssim1\%$ precision. Including various systematic errors, such as choice of $N$-body code, resolution, and through inspection of the scaled second order derivatives, we estimate the accuracy to be $\lesssim3\%$ over the hyper-cube: $w_0\in\{-1.05,-0.95\}$, $w_a\in\{-0.4,0.4\}$, $\Omega_{\rm m,0}\in\{0.21,0.4\}$, $\omega_{\rm c}\in\{0.1,0.13\}$, $\omega_{\rm b}\in\{2.0,2.4\}$, $n_{\rm s}\in\{0.85,1.05\}$, $A_s\in\{1.72\times 10^{-9},2.58\times 10^{-9}\}$, $\alpha\in\{-0.2,0.2\}$ up to $k=9.0 h/{\rm Mpc}$ and out to $z=3$. Outside of this range the model reverts to halofit2012.

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Forward citations

Cited by 2 Pith papers

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score. Full citation record

  1. Modelling the matter bispectrum at small scales in modified gravity

    astro-ph.CO 2019-09 conditional novelty 5.0 of 10

    No existing matter-bispectrum model is accurate enough for Stage IV lensing surveys across the tested modified gravity theories, and a halo-model-corrected fitting formula is the most accurate option tested.

  2. Beyond {\Lambda}CDM with the SKA Observatory -- II: Unveiling the Secrets of the Early Universe

    astro-ph.CO 2026-07 accept novelty 3.5 of 10

    Updated SKAO-AA4 forecasts show multi-tracer HI+galaxy analyses can reach σ(f_local_NL)≲1 and improve αs bounds by tens of percent when combined with future CMB, while foregrounds and GR light-cone effects remain the ...

Pith tools