REVIEW 1 cited by
Learning Fair Decisions with Factor Models: Applications to Annuity Pricing
Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.
This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.
SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event
T0 review · schema-true
One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.
pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp
read the original abstract
Fairness-aware statistical learning is essential for mitigating discrimination against protected attributes such as gender, race, and ethnicity in data-driven decision-making. This is particularly critical in high-stakes applications like insurance underwriting and annuity pricing, where biased business decisions can have significant financial and social consequences. Factor models are commonly used in these domains for risk assessment and pricing; however, their predictive outputs may inadvertently introduce or amplify bias. To address this, we propose a Fair Decision Model that incorporates fairness regularization to mitigate outcome disparities. Specifically, the model is designed to ensure that expected decision errors are balanced across demographic groups - a criterion we refer to as Decision Error Parity. We apply this framework to annuity pricing based on mortality modelling. An empirical analysis using Australian mortality data demonstrates that the Fair Decision Model can significantly reduce decision error disparity while also improving predictive accuracy compared to benchmark models, including both traditional and fair factor models.
Forward citations
Cited by 1 Pith paper
-
Marginal Fairness: Fair Decision-Making under Risk Measures
A decision rule based on distortion risk measures can be made marginally fair by projecting its weighting function onto the subspace with zero sensitivity to protected attributes.
Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.