Pith. sign in

REVIEW 3 major objections 3 minor 56 references

Relation between Wick powers and excursion clusters of the 2D GFF

T0 review · 3 major / 3 minor · reviewed 2026-08-05 · deepseek-v4-flash

Challenge this review Re-run · record.json Download PDF Read on arXiv ↗ Review JSON

Pith's one-line read For the 2D Gaussian free field, odd Wick powers can be restricted to first passage sets and excursion clusters, and the small conformal-radius neighborhoods of those sets expand in half-integer powers of 1/|log eps|, with coefficients given

desk verdict The FPS expansion (Thm 5.1) is a well-proved new result, but the excursion-cluster analogue (Thm 8.10) rests on an unproved boundary-size condition the paper acknowledges. read the letter →

arxiv 2509.01797 v1 pith:VVXAIFEJ submitted 2025-09-01 math.PR

Titus Lupu This is my paper · ORCID
classification math.PR MSC 60J6760G6060J65
keywords GaussianfreefieldfirstpassagesetexcursionclusterWickpowerconformalradiusasymptoticexpansiontwo-valuedSLE4
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal

The pith

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The reading

This paper claims that the small-scale geometry of the 2D Gaussian free field's random level components is controlled by its odd Wick powers. For a first passage set or excursion cluster, the indicator of its conformal-radius epsilon-neighborhood admits an $L^2$ asymptotic expansion in half-integer powers of $1/|\log \epsilon|$, and the coefficients are the restrictions of the odd Wick powers to the fractal set. The even Wick powers are provably absent from these expansions. The paper also proves that odd Wick powers can be restricted to these non-thin random sets, while even powers diverge on them and need an external compensating term. If correct, this gives a direct geometric route to the odd Wick powers and explains why the two parity classes of renormalized field powers behave so differently.

What carries the argument

The argument is carried by the two-variable Hermite polynomials $Q_n(x,u) = u^{n/2}H_n(xu^{-1/2})$ and the change-of-variance identity $Q_n(x,u_1+u_2) = \sum (-1)^k n!/[2^k k!(n-2k)!] Q_{n-2k}(x,u_1) u_2^k$. This identity re-expresses Wick powers when the domain is cut by a two-valued set, and it forces the combinatorial coefficients $(-1)^k/[2^k k!(k+1/2)]$. Conditioning on a two-valued set reduces the conformal-radius neighborhood indicator to a first-hitting time of a one-dimensional Brownian motion, whose density produces the half-integer powers after expansion. To go from two-valued sets to first passage sets, the proof controls the interchange of $\epsilon$ to 0 with the level of the two-valued set usin

What would settle it

Measure the area of the conformal-radius neighborhood $N_\epsilon(A)$ for a first passage set in a discretized GFF, at several $\epsilon$, and compare the leading coefficient with the Minkowski content of $A$ and the $|\log \epsilon|^{-3/2}$ coefficient with the predicted expression involving $\psi_{3,A}$. Alternatively, compute $\mathbb{E}[\mathbf{1}_{N_\epsilon(A)}]$ directly from the Brownian hitting-time density: the expansion predicts exactly $\mathbb{E}[\mathbf{1}_{N_\epsilon(A)}] = \sum (-1)^k v^{2k+1}/(\sqrt{2\pi} 2^k k!(k+1/2)) (2\pi|\log \epsilon|)^{-(k+1/2)}$; any $|\log \epsilon|^{-1}$ term or contribution from an even Wick power would disprove Theorem 5.1.

Watch

Extended reading notes

Core claim

For a first passage set $A$ of the 2D GFF with constant boundary condition, write $N_\epsilon(A) = \{z \in D\setminus A : \operatorname{CR}(z,D\setminus A) < \epsilon \operatorname{CR}(z,D)\}$. Theorem 5.1 asserts that, in $L^2(dP, H^{-\eta})$, $\mathbf{1}_{N_\epsilon(A)} = (2\pi)^{-1/2} \sum_{k=0}^{N} (-1)^k [2^k k!(k+1/2)]^{-1} \psi_{2k+1,A} (2\pi|\log \epsilon|)^{-(k+1/2)} + R_{N,\epsilon}$, with $\mathbb{E}[\|R_{N,\epsilon}\|^2_{H^{-\eta}}]^{1/2} = o(|\log \epsilon|^{-(N+1/2)})$. Here $\psi_{2k+1,A}$ are the conditional expectations of the odd Wick powers $\colon \Phi^{2k+1} \colon$ given $A$, hence generalized functions supported on $A$. Corollary 1.3 extracts each $\psi_{2n+1,A}$ as a limit of linear combinations of indicators at multiple scales, and Section 8 transfers the same expansion to each excursion cluster, yielding a full cl

Load-bearing premise

For the excursion-cluster version, the proof assumes without a complete proof that the area of a thin shell around an SLE4 cluster boundary decays faster than any negative power of $|\log \epsilon|$; the paper derives this estimate from the known fractal dimension of the boundary but does not write the full proof.

Editorial extensions

If this is right

  • The odd Wick powers of the 2D GFF are determined by the geometry of first passage sets and excursion clusters alone, and can be recovered by multi-scale counting of small conformal-radius neighborhoods.
  • For even powers, no version supported on these non-thin sets exists; any convergent renormalized even power must include a smooth compensating function outside the set that diverges non-integrably near the set.
  • The full collection of excursion clusters gives an orthogonal-in-law decomposition of every Wick power, generation by generation, so renormalized powers are assembled from independent cluster contributions.
  • The exponents differ from the Wiener-sausage case: half-integer instead of integer, so two-dimensional log-scaling carries a parity-dependent structure not visible in Brownian self-intersection local time expansions.
  • The conformal-radius expansion and the Euclidean-distance version conjectured in Section 9.1 are connected through a scale-invariant loop measure expected to describe microscopic holes of the first passage set.

Reading between the lines

Editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • If the loop-soup conjecture in Section 9.4 is correct, the exponents |log eps|^{-(n-c/2)} interpolate between the GFF result (c=1) and the Wiener sausage (c to 0), suggesting a one-parameter family of renormalized fractional powers of the loop-soup occupation field for every central charge c in (0,1).
  • The geometric multi-scale extraction could serve as an alternative definition of odd Wick powers on non-thin sets, bypassing Hermite-polynomial regularization; testing this in a metric-graph approximation of the GFF would be a natural numerical check.
  • The absence of even powers suggests a general selection rule: local-set functionals whose leading area is |log eps|^{-1/2} couple only to observables that are supported on and signed on the set, a principle that may extend to other GFF local sets and loop-soup clusters.
Share X Bluesky LinkedIn Reddit HN

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, and a circularity audit.

Referee Report

3 major / 3 minor

Summary. The paper investigates the relation between Wick powers of the 2D Gaussian free field (GFF) and its first passage sets (FPS) and excursion clusters. For an FPS A, the author defines ψ_{n,A}=E[:Φ^n:|A] and shows that odd ψ_{2k+1,A} are generalized functions supported on A, while even ψ_{2k,A} require a non-integrable exterior compensation. The main result, Theorem 5.1, states an asymptotic expansion for the conformal-radius neighborhood N_ε(A) in half-integer powers of 1/|log ε|, with coefficients the restricted odd Wick powers; even powers do not appear. The proof uses conditioning on two-valued sets (TVS) and gives explicit error bounds. Section 7 gives a Gaussian multiplicative chaos description of ψ_{n,A}. Section 8 extends the decomposition to excursion clusters, and Theorem 8.10 states the analogue of Theorem 5.1 for individual clusters. Section 9 contains conjectures relating the expansion to Le Gall's Wiener sausage expansion and to SLE-loop measures.

Significance. If the main theorem is correct, it provides a new and surprisingly clean asymptotic link between fractal local sets of the GFF and Wick renormalization, with coefficients explicitly identified and with the odd/even distinction explained. The proof of Theorem 5.1 is a substantial technical achievement: it avoids explicit two-point correlation functions and instead uses TVS conditioning, with careful Sobolev-space estimates. The paper also makes a thought-provoking connection to umbral calculus and to Le Gall's Wiener sausage expansion. However, the excursion-cluster analogue, which is part of the advertised scope, is not proved to the same standard: it depends on an explicitly unproved boundary-decay condition (8.2). This prevents the paper from being fully acceptable in its current form.

major comments (3)
  1. [§8.2] Theorem 8.10 is stated as an unconditional analogue of Theorem 5.1 for excursion clusters, but its proof relies on the unproved bound (8.2): E[Leb{z∈Int(Γ_j): d(z,Γ_j)<ε}] = o(|log ε|^{-β}) for all β. The paper explicitly says that no proof is given and that this 'should follow' from the Hausdorff dimension 3/2 of SLE4 curves. This is load-bearing: in the proof of Theorem 5.1, Lemma 5.15 is used to control the boundary contribution in the six-term error decomposition. For the random domain Int(Γ_j), condition (8.2) is exactly the replacement for that lemma. A heuristic dimension count is not a proof, especially because (8.2) involves an expectation over random CLE4-type boundaries and must hold uniformly in the small-ε regime. The theorem should either be proved with a full argument for (8.2), or explicitly stated as conditional on (8.2).
  2. [§8.2] The transfer of the FPS results from deterministic domains to the random domains Int(Γ_j) is not fully justified. The paper says that 'it is easy to check that all the domain-dependent bounds are monotonic in the domains' and that Int(Γ_j)⊂D. This is not a complete proof: several estimates in Sections 3 and 5 (e.g., Corollaries 3.3–3.4 and Lemma 5.15) depend on distances to the boundary, on the conformal radius, and on H^{-η}(C) norms that are not obviously monotone under random domain reduction. Since Γ_j is random and correlated with the field, one needs a uniform-in-domain argument or a separate proof for the random case. This gap is closely related to (8.2), and together they undermine the current formulation of Theorem 8.10.
  3. [§6.1] Section 6 is explicitly heuristic, but it contains statements labelled as 'Claim' rather than 'Conjecture'. Claim 6.1 (the coupling with positive probability) and Claim 6.3 (the asymptotic expansion with ε replaced by a deterministic function) are used to formulate the consistency principle, but no proofs are given and the text says 'we leave the details for the reader'. Since these claims are not used in the proof of Theorem 5.1, this is not a fatal issue, but it is misleading to label them as claims. They should either be proved or explicitly labelled as heuristic assumptions.
minor comments (3)
  1. [§5.3] The constant in the bound (5.17) appears to be off by a factor of π: from the displayed estimate P_0(T_{-b,b}>t) ≤ (4/π) e^{-π^2t/(8b^2)}, taking square roots gives a prefactor 2/√π, not 2√π. The error is harmless because only the exponential rate matters, but the constants should be corrected or explained.
  2. [§4.3] In part (1) the limit is written as 'lim_{q→0}', but from the proof and from definition (4.9) the intended limit is q→∞. Please fix.
  3. [Throughout] The paper contains several 'we omit the details' or 'tedious but standard' statements (e.g., in Propositions 4.18, 8.4, 8.12). Most are believable, but in a paper of this length it would help the reader if the omitted computations were at least summarized in an appendix or in footnotes with the main algebraic steps.

Circularity Check

1 steps flagged · score 1.0 of 10

No circular reduction: Theorem 5.1's expansion is genuinely derived from independently defined conditional-expectation fields ψ_{2k+1,A} via conditional laws and Hermite reexpansion identities; the only flagged weakness is the explicitly unproved boundary-decay condition (8.2) in the excursion-cluster transfer (Theorem 8.10), which is a correctness gap, not circularity.

  1. other [Section 8.2, condition (8.2) before Theorem 8.10 (random-domain transfer of Theorem 5.1)]
    "For the random domain Int(Γ j ) it translates into the condition (8.2) ∀β >0, E[Leb{z ∈ Int(Γj)|d(z, Γj) < ε}] = o(| log ε|−β). We claim that this condition is satisfied with a very wide margin since the dimension of an SLE4 curve is 3/2 [Bef08], and in particular, one has a polynomial decay ε1/2+o(1). However, we will not give a precise proof of (8.2), because bridging the gap between what is written in the literature and our precise setting appears to be both very standard and at the same time a very lengthy detour through SLE theory."

    Flagged per review rule, but this is NOT a circular reduction. (8.2) is a geometric estimate (Lebesgue measure of the tubular neighborhood of the random SLE4-type boundary Γ_j decays faster than any power of |log ε|), asserted to follow from Beffara's Hausdorff-dimension-3/2 theorem. It does not define, and is not implied by, the conclusion of Theorem 8.10: the expansion coefficients ψ_{2k+1,j} are defined in Theorem 8.9 as limits of Q_n(ν_{j,ε}, V_{C_j,Γ_j,ε}) from Wick-power conditional expectations, independently of (8.2). The condition is an unproved intermediate input to Lemma 5.15-style boundary control in the random domain; if it failed, the proof of Theorem 8.10 would be incomplete, but the deterministic-domain Theorem 5.1 is unaffected. The paper explicitly discloses the omission

full rationale

The derivation chain is self-contained. ψ_{n,A} (Section 4.1) is defined as E[:Φ^n:|A] from the Wick powers built in Section 2.2 by mollification and Hermite renormalization — it makes no reference to the neighborhoods N_ε(A) defined later in (5.1). Theorem 5.1 therefore is not self-definitional: the object expanded (1_{N_ε(A)}) and the coefficients (ψ_{2k+1,A}) are independent families, and the expansion genuinely relates them. The proof goes through the conditional-expectation identity of Proposition 5.12 (obtained from Theorem 2.6 on the law of the conformal-radius ratio, the TVS conditional structure, and the Hermite reexpansion identity of Proposition 5.11), followed by a six-term error decomposition (Section 5.7) with concrete bounds (Lemmas 5.13–5.35) and the scale choices (5.36). No parameter is fitted to any subset of the data, and no 'prediction' is an input renamed. The leading-order coefficient reproduces, but does not presuppose, Theorem 2.4: ψ_{1,A} = ν_A is identified in Section 4.1 from the field decomposition, and the k=0 asymptotics are derived by the same error machinery, so Theorem 5.1 is not a repackaging of the Minkowski-content limit. Corollary 5.8 inverts the expansion to express ψ_{2n+1,A} in terms of 1_{N_ε}: that is a consequence, not an input. Self-citations (ALS20a, ALS22, ALS23; ASW19) are load-bearing background, but they are independent proven theorems with stated assumptions that do not include the target result and no fitted parameters, so per the rules they constitute real evidence and do not raise the circularity score. Le Gall's Wiener-sausage expansion (Theorem 2.7) is used only as a point of comparison; the paper explicitly does not derive Theorem 5.1 from it, and the exponents and fields genuinely differ. The one flagged item — condition (8.2) in Section 8.2 — is an admitted missing proof of a geometric decay bound, attributed to external SLE theory (Bef08); it is a completeness gap in the excursion-cluster analogue Theorem 8.10, not a circular step, and Theorem 5.1 is unaffected. Overall: no step reduces the conclusion to its input by construction; score 1 reflects the residual weight of the unproved (8.2) condition and heavy reliance on the author's earlier theorems, without any circularity finding.

Assumptions & free parameters 0 free parameters · 4 assumptions · 1 invented entities

The central claim rests on established SLE/CLE background theorems and one unproved condition for the excursion cluster part. No free parameters are fitted to data. The invented entity is conjectural and does not support the main results.

assumptions (4)
  • domain assumption Theorem 2.2 (ASW19): law of TVS conformal radius ratio and label function
    Cited background result on two-valued sets, used in Lemma 5.13 and Section 5.2 to compute conditional probabilities.
  • domain assumption Theorem 2.3 (ALS22): identity in law including extremal distance, requires b-a in 2 lambda N
    Used in Lemma 5.18 to bound probabilities involving the TVS loop; the integer-multiple condition is respected in the proof.
  • domain assumption Theorem 2.4 (ALS20a): FPS measure is a Minkowski content and equals psi_1,A
    Identifies the leading coefficient in the asymptotic expansion and the nature of nu_A.
  • ad hoc to paper Unproved condition (8.2): Lebesgue measure of epsilon-neighborhood of Gamma_j decays faster than any power of |log epsilon|
    Needed for Theorem 8.10 on excursion clusters; the paper explicitly does not prove it, citing SLE4 dimension 3/2.
invented entities (1)
  • Renormalized signed fractional powers of the occupation field
    purpose: Hypothesized to appear as coefficients in the conjectured asymptotic expansion for Brownian loop soup clusters at central charge c in (0,1)
    Introduced in Section 9.4 as a conjecture, not used in the main theorems; no falsifiable handle provided.

how reviews work

0 comments
Cite this review

Pith. "Pith review of Relation between Wick powers and excursion clusters of the 2D GFF." pith.science (2026). https://pith.science/paper/VVXAIFEJ

@misc{pith2026250901797,
  author       = {Pith},
  title        = {Pith review of: Relation between Wick powers and excursion clusters of the 2D GFF},
  year         = {2026},
  howpublished = {\url{https://pith.science/paper/VVXAIFEJ}},
  note         = {Machine review of arXiv:2509.01797}
}
abstract

We study the decomposition of the Wick powers of the continuum GFF in dimension $2$ via the first passage sets (FPS) and the excursion clusters (sign components) of the GFF. These sets are non-thin for the GFF, that is to say the field has non-trivial restriction to such a set, which is a measure, negative or positive depending on the sign. In this work we show that all the odd Wick powers of the GFF can be restricted to the FPS and the excursion clusters, and the restrictions are generalized functions supported on these fractal sets. By contrast, the restriction of an even Wick power to an FPS or excursion cluster is diverging, and to get something converging an additional compensation is required, which is provided by a smooth function living outside of the set and blowing up in a non-integrable way when approaching the set. We further provide expressions of restricted odd Wick powers and restricted-compensated even Wick powers as limits of functions living outside the FPS/excursion cluster. Then, we study the $\varepsilon$-neighborhoods, in the sense of conformal radius, of first passage sets and excursion clusters. We show that such $\varepsilon$-neighborhoods admit asymptotic expansions in $L^2$ into half-integer powers $\vert\log \varepsilon\vert^{-(n+1/2)}$, $n\in\mathbb{N}$, of $1/\vert\log \varepsilon\vert$. The coefficients of the expansion involve the restrictions of the odd Wick powers. By contrast, the even Wick powers do not appear in the expansion. Our expansion is reminiscent of Le Gall's expansion for the Wiener sausage in dimension 2, with however some important differences. The most important one is that the powers of $1/\vert\log \varepsilon\vert$ are different. In the case of the Wiener sausage the powers are integer, $\vert\log \varepsilon\vert^{-n}$, $n\in\mathbb{N}\setminus \{0\}$.

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

56 extracted references · 54 canonical work pages

  1. [1]

    Multiplicative chaos of the Brownian loop soup

    Elie Aïdékon, Nathanaël Berestycki, Antoine Jego, and Titus Lupu. Multiplicative chaos of the Brownian loop soup . Proceedings of the London Mathematical Society , 126:1254--1393, 2023

    work page 2023

  2. [2]

    Adams and John J.F

    Robert A. Adams and John J.F. Fournier. Sobolev spaces , volume 140 of Pure and Applied Mathematics . Academic press, 2nd edition, 2003

    work page 2003

  3. [3]

    Conformal invariants: topics in geometric function theory , volume 371

    Lars Valerian Ahlfors. Conformal invariants: topics in geometric function theory , volume 371. American Mathematical Society, 2010

    work page 2010

  4. [4]

    First passage sets of the 2 D G aussian free field

    Juhan Aru, Titus Lupu, and Avelio Sep\' u lveda. First passage sets of the 2 D G aussian free field. Probability Theory and Related Fields , 176:1303–1355, 2020

    work page 2020

  5. [5]

    The first passage sets of the 2 D G aussian free field: convergence and isomorphism

    Juhan Aru, Titus Lupu, and Avelio Sep\' u lveda. The first passage sets of the 2 D G aussian free field: convergence and isomorphism. Communications in Mathematical Physics , 375:1885--1929, 2020

    work page 1929

  6. [6]

    Extremal distance and conformal radius of a CLE _4 loop

    Juhan Aru, Titus Lupu, and Avelio Sep \'u lveda. Extremal distance and conformal radius of a CLE _4 loop . The Annals of Probability , 50(2):509--558, 2022

    work page 2022

  7. [7]

    Excursion decomposition of the 2D continuum GFF

    Juhan Aru, Titus Lupu, and Avelio Sep\'ulveda. Excursion decomposition of the 2D continuum GFF . arXiv:2304.03150, 2023

    arXiv 2023

  8. [8]

    Unitarizing probability measures for representations of Virasoro algebra

    Hélène Airault and Paul Malliavin. Unitarizing probability measures for representations of Virasoro algebra . Journal de Mathématiques Pures et Appliquées , 80(6):627--667, 2001

    work page 2001

Show all 56 references
  1. [9]

    On spaces of potentials connected with L^p classes

    Nachman Aronszajn, Fuad Mulla, and Pawel Szeptycki. On spaces of potentials connected with L^p classes . Annales de l’Institut Fourier , 13(2):211--306, 1963

    1963

  2. [10]

    Thick points of the planar GFF are totally disconnected for all 0^

    Juhan Aru, Léonie Papon, and Ellen Powell. Thick points of the planar GFF are totally disconnected for all 0^ . Electronic Journal of Probability , 28(85):1--24, 2023

    2023

  3. [11]

    Liouville measure as a multiplicative cascade via level sets of the G aussian free field

    Juhan Aru, Ellen Powell, and Avelio Sep \'u lveda. Liouville measure as a multiplicative cascade via level sets of the G aussian free field. Annales de l'Institut Fourier , 70(1):205--245, 2020

    2020

  4. [12]

    Gaussian multiplicative chaos through the lens of the 2D Gaussian free field

    Juhan Aru. Gaussian multiplicative chaos through the lens of the 2D Gaussian free field . Markov Processes and Related Fields , 26(1):17--56, 2020

    2020

  5. [13]

    Nachman Aronszajn and Kennan T. Smith. Theory of Bessel potentials. I . Annales de l’Institut Fourier , 11:385--475, 1961

    1961

  6. [14]

    Stegun, editors

    Milton Abramowitz and Irene A. Stegun, editors. Handbook of mathematical functions with formulas, graphs, and mathematical tables . A Wiley-Interscience Publication. John Wiley & Sons, Inc., New York; John Wiley & Sons, Inc., New York, 1984. Reprint of the 1972 edition, Select...

    1984

  7. [15]

    Two-valued local sets of the 2D continuum Gaussian free field: connectivity, labels, and induced metrics

    Juhan Aru and Avelio Sep \'u lveda. Two-valued local sets of the 2D continuum Gaussian free field: connectivity, labels, and induced metrics . Electronic Journal of Probability , 23:1--35, 2018

    2018

  8. [16]

    On bounded-type thin local sets of the two-dimensional G aussian free field

    Juhan Aru, Avelio Sep \'u lveda, and Wendelin Werner. On bounded-type thin local sets of the two-dimensional G aussian free field. Journal of the Institute of Mathematics of Jussieu , 18(3):591--618, 2019

    2019

  9. [17]

    The dimension of the SLE curves

    Vincent Beffara. The dimension of the SLE curves . The Annals of Probability , 36(4):1421--1452, 2008

    2008

  10. [18]

    An elementary approach to G aussian multiplicative chaos

    Nathana\" e l Berestycki. An elementary approach to G aussian multiplicative chaos. Electronic Communications in Probability , 22(27):1--12, 2017

    2017

  11. [19]

    The CFT of SLE loop measures and the Kontsevich--Suhov conjecture

    Guillaume Baverez and Antoine Jego. The CFT of SLE loop measures and the Kontsevich--Suhov conjecture . arXiv:2407.09080, 2024

    2024 arXiv

  12. [20]

    Handbook of B rownian M otion - F acts and F ormulae

    Andrei Borodin and Paavo Salminen. Handbook of B rownian M otion - F acts and F ormulae . Probability and I ts A pplications. Birkhäuser, 2nd, corrected edition, 2015

    2015

  13. [21]

    Liouville quantum gravity and KPZ

    Bertrand Duplantier and Scott Sheffield. Liouville quantum gravity and KPZ . Inventiones Mathematicae , 185(2):333--393, 2011

    2011

  14. [22]

    SLE and the free field: Partition functions and couplings

    Julien Dub\'edat. SLE and the free field: Partition functions and couplings . Journal of the American Mathematical Society , 22(4):995--1054, 2009

    2009

  15. [23]

    Polynomials of the occupation field and related random fields

    Evgeniy Dynkin. Polynomials of the occupation field and related random fields . Journal of Functional Analysis , 58:20--52, 1984

    1984

  16. [24]

    A general class of quantum fields without cut-offs in two space-time dimensions

    Raphael Høegh-Krohn. A general class of quantum fields without cut-offs in two space-time dimensions. Communications in Mathematical Physics , 21:244--255, 1971

    1971

  17. [25]

    Analysis in Banach Spaces

    Tuomas Hytönen, Jan van Neerven, Mark Veraar, and Lutz Weis. Analysis in Banach Spaces. Volume I: Martingales and Littlewood-Paley Theory , volume 63 of A Series of Modern Surveys in Mathematics . Springer, 2016

    2016

  18. [26]

    Kiyosi Itô and Henry P. McKean. Diffusion processes and their sample paths . Classics in mathematics. Springer, 1974

    1974

  19. [27]

    Gaussian Hilbert Spaces , volume 129 of Cambridge Tracts in Mathematics

    Svante Janson. Gaussian Hilbert Spaces , volume 129 of Cambridge Tracts in Mathematics . Cambridge University Press, 1997

    1997

  20. [28]

    Planar B rownian motion and G aussian multiplicative chaos

    Antoine Jego. Planar B rownian motion and G aussian multiplicative chaos. The Annals of Probability , 48(4):1597--1643, 2020

    2020

  21. [29]

    Conformally invariant fields out of Brownian loop soups

    Antoine Jego, Titus Lupu, and Wei Qian. Conformally invariant fields out of Brownian loop soups . arXiv:2307.10740, 2023

    2023 arXiv

  22. [30]

    Sur le chaos multiplicatif

    Jean-Pierre Kahane. Sur le chaos multiplicatif. Annales des Sciences Mathématiques du Québec , 9(2):105--150, 1985

    1985

  23. [31]

    Nam-Guy Kang and Nikolai G. Makarov. Gaussian free field and conformal field theory , volume 353 of Astérisque . Soci \'e t \'e Math \'e matique de France, 2013

    2013

  24. [32]

    On Malliavin measures, SLE, and CFT

    Maxim Kontsevich and Yurii Suhov. On Malliavin measures, SLE, and CFT . Proceedings of the Steklov Institute of Mathematics , 258:107--153, 2007

    2007

  25. [33]

    The nested simple conformal loop ensembles in the Riemann sphere

    Antti Kemppainen and Wendelin Werner. The nested simple conformal loop ensembles in the Riemann sphere . Probability Theory and Related Fields , 165(3-4):835–866, 2016

    2016

  26. [34]

    Gregory F. Lawler. Conformally invariant processes in the plane , volume 114 of Mathematical Surveys and Monographs . American Mathematical Society, 2005

    2005

  27. [35]

    Wiener sausage and self-intersection local times

    Jean-François Le Gall. Wiener sausage and self-intersection local times. Journal of Functional Analysis , 88(2):299--341, 1990

    1990

  28. [36]

    \'Ecole d'\'Eté de Probabilités de Saint-Flour XX - 1990 , volume 1527 of Lecture Notes in Mathematics , chapter Some properties of planar Brownian motion

    Jean-François Le Gall. \'Ecole d'\'Eté de Probabilités de Saint-Flour XX - 1990 , volume 1527 of Lecture Notes in Mathematics , chapter Some properties of planar Brownian motion . Springer, 1992

    1990

  29. [37]

    Markov paths, loops and fields

    Yves Le Jan. Markov paths, loops and fields. École d'Été de Probabilités de Saint-Flour XXXVIII – 2008 , volume 2026 of Lecture Notes in Mathematics . Springer, 2011

    2008

  30. [38]

    Marcus, and Jay Rosen

    Yves Le Jan, Michael B. Marcus, and Jay Rosen. Intersection local times, loop soups and permanental Wick powers , volume 247 of Memoirs of the American Mathematical Society . American Mathematical Society, 2017

    2017

  31. [39]

    Lawler and Wendelin Werner

    Gregory F. Lawler and Wendelin Werner. The B rownian loop soup. Probability Theory and Related Fields , 128:565--588, 2004

    2004

  32. [40]

    Imaginary geometry I : interacting SLE s

    Jason Miller and Scott Sheffield. Imaginary geometry I : interacting SLE s. Probability Theory and Related Fields , 164(3-4):553--705, 2016

    2016

  33. [41]

    Projection estimates for harmonic measure

    Bernt Oksendal. Projection estimates for harmonic measure. Arkiv för Matematik , 21(1-2):191--203, 1983

    1983

  34. [42]

    Decomposition of B rownian loop-soup clusters

    Wei Qian and Wendelin Werner. Decomposition of B rownian loop-soup clusters. Journal of the European Mathematical Society , 21(10):3225--3253, 2019

    2019

  35. [43]

    On the Foundations of Combinatorial Theory

    Gian-Carlo Rota, David Kahaner, and Andrew Odlyzko. On the Foundations of Combinatorial Theory. VIII. Finite Operator Calculus . Journal of Mathematical Analysis and Application , 42:684--760, 1973

    1973

  36. [44]

    The Umbral Calculus , volume 111 of Dover Books on Mathematics

    Steven Roman. The Umbral Calculus , volume 111 of Dover Books on Mathematics . Academic Press, Inc., 1st edition, 1984

    1984

  37. [45]

    Gaussian multiplicative chaos and applications: a review

    R\' e mi Rhodes and Vincent Vargas. Gaussian multiplicative chaos and applications: a review. Probability Surveys , 11:315--392, 2014

    2014

  38. [46]

    On thin local sets of the G aussian free field

    Avelio Sepúlveda. On thin local sets of the G aussian free field. Annales de l'Institut Henri Poincaré, Probabilités et Statistiques , 55(3):1797--1813, 2019

    2019

  39. [47]

    Gaussian free fields for mathematicians

    Scott Sheffield. Gaussian free fields for mathematicians. Probability Theory and Related Fields , 139(3):521--541, 2007

    2007

  40. [48]

    The P( ) 2 E uclidean (quantum) field theory

    Barry Simon. The P( ) 2 E uclidean (quantum) field theory . Princeton Series in Physics. Princeton University Press, 1974

    1974

  41. [49]

    Contour lines of the two-dimensional discrete G aussian free field

    Oded Schramm and Scott Sheffield. Contour lines of the two-dimensional discrete G aussian free field. Acta Mathematica , 202(1):21--137, 2009

    2009

  42. [50]

    A contour line of the continuum G aussian free field

    Oded Schramm and Scott Sheffield. A contour line of the continuum G aussian free field. Probability Theory and Related Fields , 157(1-2):47--80, 2013

    2013

  43. [51]

    Dimensions of two-valued sets via imaginary chaos

    Lukas Schoug, Avelio Sep \'u lveda, and Fredrik Viklund. Dimensions of two-valued sets via imaginary chaos . International Mathematics Research Notices , 2022(5):3219–3261, 2022

    2022

  44. [52]

    Conformal loop ensembles: the M arkovian characterization and the loop-soup construction

    Scott Sheffield and Wendelin Werner. Conformal loop ensembles: the M arkovian characterization and the loop-soup construction. Annals of Mathematics , 176(3):1827--1917, 2012

    1917

  45. [53]

    The conformally invariant measure on self-avoiding loops

    Wendelin Werner. The conformally invariant measure on self-avoiding loops. Journal of American Mathematical Society , 21:137--169, 2008

    2008

  46. [54]

    Lecture notes on the Gaussian free field , volume 28 of Cours Sp\'ecialis\'es

    Wendelin Werner and Ellen Powell. Lecture notes on the Gaussian free field , volume 28 of Cours Sp\'ecialis\'es . Soci \'e t \'e Math \'e matique de France, 2021

    2021

  47. [55]

    Level lines of G aussian free field I : zero-boundary GFF

    Menglu Wang and Hao Wu. Level lines of G aussian free field I : zero-boundary GFF . Stochastic Processes and their Applications , 127(4):1045--1124, 2017

    2017

  48. [56]

    TSLE loop measures

    Dapeng Zhan. TSLE loop measures . Probability Theory and Related Fields , 179(1-2):345–406, 2021

    2021

Pith tools

Reviewed August 5, 2026 · model on record in the stance chip above.