Pith. sign in

REVIEW 3 major objections 5 minor 32 references

Uncooled Thermal Infrared Detection Near the Fundamental Limit Using a Nanomechanical Resonator with a Broadband Absorber

T0 review · 3 major / 5 minor · reviewed 2026-08-10 · deepseek-v4-flash

Challenge this review Re-run · record.json Download PDF Read on arXiv ↗

Pith's one-line read A nanomechanical IR detector reaches 27 pW/√Hz at room temperature

desk verdict Solid experimental demonstration of a nanomechanical IR detector with a clever readout-laser clearance; the headline D* is internally consistent, but the broadband absorptance claim outruns the measurement. read the letter →

arxiv 2501.03161 v2 pith:VX7PPBUE submitted 2025-01-06 physics.ins-det

Paolo Martini , Stefan Emminger , Kostas Kanellopulos , Niklas Luhmann , Markus Piller , Robert Greyson West , Silvan Schmid This is my paper · ORCID
classification physics.ins-det
keywords infrareddetectionnanomechanicalresonatorthermaldetectorFSIMabsorbernoiseequivalentpowerspecificdetectivitysiliconnitridemembranephotothermalback-action
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal

The pith

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The reading

The paper aims to show that a nanomechanical silicon nitride drum, coated with a thin platinum film, can detect infrared light at room temperature almost as well as physics allows. The key result is a noise equivalent power of $27\,\mathrm{pW}/\sqrt{\mathrm{Hz}}$ and a specific detectivity of $3.8\times10^9\,\mathrm{cm}\sqrt{\mathrm{Hz}}/\mathrm{W}$ in the best 1 mm resonator, within a factor of three of the thermal-fluctuation floor for a detector that absorbs 50% of the light. The broadband platinum absorber gives the device a flat response from near-IR to far-IR, unlike narrow-band metamaterial absorbers. A circular clearance in the platinum film lets the readout laser hit bare silicon nitride, removing the photothermal back-action that otherwise degrades frequency stability. If the claims hold, the device offers a practical route to uncooled IR sensing near the fundamental limit.

What carries the argument

The load-bearing object is a square 50 nm SiN membrane (1–3 mm side) coated with a roughly 3 nm Pt film that acts as a free-space impedance-matched (FSIM) absorber: a thin metal film with a nominal 50% absorptance over a wide infrared range. Absorbed IR changes the membrane temperature, which changes its stress and therefore its resonance frequency; that frequency shift is read out optically with a laser Doppler vibrometer and a phase-locked loop. The platinum film has a circular clearance where the readout laser hits the bare SiN, suppressing photothermal back-action noise from laser intensity fluctuations. The performance model combines the thermal time constant $\tau_{\mathrm{th}} = C/G$, the temperature responsivity $R_T = -\alpha_{\mathrm{th}}/(2(1-\nu))\,E/\sigma$, and noise terms (additive phase noise, temperature-fluctuation noise, photothermal back-action) into $\mathrm{NEP} = \sqrt{S_y}/(R_P\alpha)$.

What would settle it

Measure the absorptance spectrum of the same 3 nm Pt-on-SiN film from 1 micrometre out to terahertz wavelengths with a broadband source; if the spectrally averaged absorptance drops well below 0.47 outside the measured mid-IR window, or if a calibrated NEP measurement at those wavelengths degrades by more than the stated factor, the extended-range near-fundamental-limit claim is falsified.

Watch

Extended reading notes

Core claim

The paper's central claim is that a 50 nm square silicon nitride membrane resonator, coated with a roughly 3 nm platinum free-space impedance-matched (FSIM) absorber, works as an uncooled thermal infrared detector whose sensitivity approaches the fundamental thermodynamic limit. In the best 1 mm device, operated in the (2,2) mode, the measured noise equivalent power is $27\,\mathrm{pW}/\sqrt{\mathrm{Hz}}$ and the specific detectivity is $D^* = 3.8\times10^9\,\mathrm{cm}\sqrt{\mathrm{Hz}}/\mathrm{W}$, less than a factor of three below the theoretical room-temperature limit $D^* \approx 1.0\times10^{10}\,\mathrm{cm}\sqrt{\mathrm{Hz}}/\mathrm{W}$ for an ideal detector with 50% absorptance. The detector keeps this performance while covering an extended spectral range from near-infrared to far-infrared, because the metal-film absorber gives a nominally flat ~50% absorptance rather than a narrow resonant peak. The authors position the device among the most sensitive room-temperature IR detectors reported, on par with state-of-the-art optomechanical detectors using subwavelength metamaterial absorbers.

Load-bearing premise

The detection claims rest on the platinum film absorbing about 47% of infrared across the whole near-IR-to-far-IR range, but the paper only measures absorptance in the mid-infrared window that its optical fibre transmits.

Editorial extensions

If this is right

  • The same detector geometry should work as a broadband spectrometer element, because the flat 50% absorptance avoids spectral shaping by the absorber.
  • Only a factor of 1.4 in ultimate sensitivity is traded for broadband operation compared with a perfect 100% absorber.
  • Pointing the readout laser at the clearance suppresses photothermal back-action, leaving additive phase noise as the dominant noise source.
  • Smaller membranes respond faster ($\tau_{\mathrm{th}} = 14$ ms) and give the best NEP, so footprint and sensitivity align.
  • Trampoline resonators with the same FSIM absorber should push the detector closer to the fundamental limit.

Reading between the lines

Editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • If the absorptance remains flat beyond the measured fibre window, the same detector could serve as a broadband reference standard for IR power metrology without spectral calibration.
  • The mode-shape dependence of responsivity suggests that engineering the temperature field, for example placing the absorber where thermal isolation and displacement overlap, could improve sensitivity beyond what this geometry achieves.
  • The clearance trick could be transferred to other optomechanical detectors with absorbing coatings, wherever readout-light absorption creates back-action.
  • One testable extension is to repeat the NEP measurement with band-pass filters inside the claimed range; a flat D* versus wavelength would confirm the broadband claim.
Share X Bluesky LinkedIn Reddit HN

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, and a circularity audit.

Referee Report

3 major / 5 minor

Summary. The paper reports a nanomechanical silicon nitride membrane resonator with a platinum free-space impedance-matched (FSIM) absorber for uncooled thermal infrared detection. A circular clearance in the Pt absorber lets the readout laser hit the bare SiN, suppressing photothermal back-action; measurements in vacuum and an artificial thermal bath characterize thermal time constants, power responsivity, and frequency stability for 18 membranes of three sizes. For the best 1 mm resonator in the (2,2) mode, the authors report NEP = 27 pW/√Hz and D* = 3.8×10^9 cm√Hz/W, stating this is less than a factor of three below the fundamental thermal-fluctuation limit for a 50%-absorptance detector at room temperature, with an absorber claimed to be broadband from near-IR to far-IR. The results are compared with analytical models and FEM simulations, using material-parameter uncertainty bands.

Significance. If substantiated, the central claim is significant: a room-temperature, broadband, uncooled IR detector operating within a factor of three of the fundamental thermal-fluctuation limit would be a notable advance for nanomechanical sensing and could compete with state-of-the-art pyroelectric and optomechanical detectors. The design contribution of a clearance in the absorber to avoid photothermal back-action is elegant, is supported by a direct comparison of Allan deviations with and without the clearance, and is a transferable idea. The paper also offers a fairly complete characterization against analytical and FEM models with uncertainty bands, and uses machine-checkable formulas for the figures of merit. The main limitation is that the broadband and near-limit claims rest on an absorptance value measured only over the mid-IR window of the fiber-coupled source, and on a single best-performing device without reported uncertainties.

major comments (3)
  1. [Section IIIB and Supplementary 'Calculation of Platinum Absorptance'] The paper's broadband claim and the factor-of-three closeness to the fundamental limit depend on the absorptance value α = 0.47, but this α is the unweighted average of the FTIR-measured absorptance only over the spectral window transmitted by the IR optical fiber (white area in Supp. Fig. 1a; grey areas explicitly excluded). The FTIR data in Fig. 2c and Supp. Fig. 1b show clear spectral dependence and, as the Supplementary states, the Pt thickness is approximately 3 nm rather than the 5 nm needed for flat 50% absorptance. No measurement supports α ≈ 0.47 at near-IR wavelengths below approximately 2 μm or above approximately 25 μm, so the asserted 'near-IR to far-IR' (or THz) range and the corresponding statement that D* is only about three times below the fundamental limit across that extended range are extrapolations, not observations. Please either provide absorptance data or validated optical calculations covering the full claimed spectral range, or restrict the central claims to the measured mid-IR window.
  2. [Section IIID and Fig. 5] The headline values NEP = 27 pW/√Hz and D* = 3.8×10^9 cm√Hz/W are reported as point values without uncertainties, and the text in Section IIID states that 'performance varies strongly between different resonators' while the caption of Fig. 5 says 'minimal differences in performance between the different modes and dimensions.' If the best-performing device is selected from a set with strong device-to-device scatter, the factor-of-three closeness to the fundamental limit cannot be assessed without a quantitative measure of that scatter. Please provide the distribution of NEP and D* over the measured devices, or at least error bars propagated from the uncertainties in Sy, RP, and α through Eqs. (1) and (4).
  3. [Section IIIB] The responsivity is measured with a broadband IR source (Arclight-MIR) delivered through an optical fiber, with P = 7.5 μW stated as the impinging power. The absorptance used in the NEP calculation, α = 0.47, is an unweighted average over the fiber-transmitted spectral window. If the source spectrum is not flat within that window, the effective absorptance entering Eq. (1) differs from the unweighted average. The paper should specify the source spectral distribution and either weight α accordingly or show that the absorptance is sufficiently flat within the window that the unweighted average is a good approximation.
minor comments (5)
  1. [Section IIID and Fig. 5] The statement in Section IIID that 'performance varies strongly between different resonators' appears to conflict with the Fig. 5 caption that 'minimal differences in performance between the different modes and dimensions.' Please clarify whether the variation is among individual devices of the same geometry or among different modes and membrane sizes.
  2. [Section IIIA, Eqs. (7) and (16)] The symbol ε is used for emissivity in Eqs. (7) and (16), while α is used for absorptance in Eq. (1); the Supplementary and the text sometimes use these interchangeably. Please adopt consistent notation and state the assumption that the thermal emissivity equals the IR absorptance.
  3. [Abstract and Section IV] The phrases 'near-IR to far-IR' and 'to the terahertz regime' are used without quantitative wavelength bounds. Please specify the intended range or cite a reference for the FSIM bandwidth.
  4. [Fig. 2c caption] The caption of Fig. 2c does not explain the grey shaded regions; the Supplementary does, but the main-text figure should also state that these are wavelength ranges not transmitted by the IR optical fiber.
  5. [Section IIIA] The '90-10 method' for extracting the thermal time constant is not defined; a brief sentence describing the method would improve readability.

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged · score 0.0 of 10

No circularity: NEP and D* are computed from direct measurements and compared with the standard thermal-fluctuation limit, not derived from the claim itself.

full rationale

The derivation chain is self-contained: NEP = sqrt(Sy)/(RP*alpha) uses directly measured frequency stability Sy, measured responsivity RP, and FTIR-measured absorptance alpha = 0.47; D* = sqrt(A)/NEP then follows by definition. The theoretical comparison uses Eq. 17, D* = sqrt(epsilon/(32 sigma_SB k_B T^5)), a standard thermal-fluctuation benchmark that is also supported by the general IR-detector references [1-4] and does not incorporate the paper's measured values. Although several interpretive models (Eqs. 8, 10, 15) are cited to the authors' own prior work ([21], [25]), they are standard analytical results validated in the paper against FEM simulations and measured Allan deviations, and none of them is fitted to the target NEP/D* values. The principal caveat is evidentiary, not circular: alpha = 0.47 is averaged only over the fiber-transmitted mid-IR window, so the near-IR/far-IR broadband extension is extrapolated; this affects the strength of the claim but does not make the derivation equivalent to its inputs.

Assumptions & free parameters 0 free parameters · 4 assumptions · 0 invented entities

No new physical postulates or entities are introduced. The results rest on established thin-film absorption theory (Hilsum), standard nanomechanical resonator models, thermal fluctuation noise theory, and the authors' design of a laser clearance, which is a geometric modification rather than a new physical entity.

assumptions (4)
  • domain assumption Free-space impedance-matched thin metal films absorb up to 50% of incident IR over a broad spectral range (Hilsum [28]).
    Invoked in the abstract and Section III.A to claim the Pt FSIM absorber gives broadband absorption with nominal 50% absorptance.
  • domain assumption The temperature responsivity model RT = -alpha_th/(2(1-nu)) E/sigma (Eq. 9) describes the frequency shift per unit temperature for a stressed membrane.
    Used to compute the theoretical power responsivity (Eq. 8) and is from ref [21].
  • standard math The thermal fluctuation noise formula (Eq. 15) and the derived detectivity limit D* = sqrt(epsilon/(32 sigma_SB k_B T^5)) (Eq. 17) are the correct fundamental limits for a thermal detector.
    Standard statistical thermodynamics result from ref [21], used as the benchmark for the paper's 'near fundamental limit' claim.
  • domain assumption The heat capacity and thermal conductance of the membrane stack are given by Eqs. (5)-(7), using material parameters for thin SiN and Pt films.
    Used to model tau_th and G; the paper states that the Pt thermal conductivity is uncertain and gives a range, but uses mean values.

how reviews work

0 comments
Cite this review

Pith. "Pith review of Uncooled Thermal Infrared Detection Near the Fundamental Limit Using a Nanomechanical Resonator with a Broadband Absorber." pith.science (2026). https://pith.science/paper/VX7PPBUE

@misc{pith2026250103161,
  author       = {Pith},
  title        = {Pith review of: Uncooled Thermal Infrared Detection Near the Fundamental Limit Using a Nanomechanical Resonator with a Broadband Absorber},
  year         = {2026},
  howpublished = {\url{https://pith.science/paper/VX7PPBUE}},
  note         = {Machine review of arXiv:2501.03161}
}
read the original abstract

This paper introduces a thermal infrared detector utilizing a nano-optomechanical silicon nitride (SiN) resonator, equipped with a free-space impedance-matched (FSIM) absorber composed of a platinum (Pt) thin film, offering a broadband spectral absorptance on average of 47%. To reduce photothermal back-action caused by intensity fluctuations of the readout laser, the FSIM absorber incorporates a circular clearance for the laser. The study provides a comprehensive characterization of the thermal time constant, power responsivity, and frequency stability of the resonators, with experimental results compared to analytical models and finite element method (FEM) simulations. The fastest thermal response is observed for the smallest 1 mm resonators, with a thermal time constant tau_th = 14 ms. The noise equivalent power (NEP) of the resonators is assessed, showing that the smallest 1 mm resonators exhibit the best sensitivity, with NEP = 27 pW/sqrt(Hz) and a respective specific detectivity of D* = 3.8e9 cm sqrt(Hz)/W. This is less than three times below the theoretical maximum for an ideal IR detector with 50% absorptance. This places our resonators among the most sensitive room-temperature IR detectors reported to date offering an extended spectral range from the near-IR to far-IR. This work underscores the potential of nano-optomechanical resonators for high-performance IR sensing applications.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2501.03161 by the authors.

Figure 1
Figure 1. Schematic representation of the IR measurement setup. T.c. stands for temperature controller. Inset: optical microscope picture of a [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p003_1.png] view at source ↗
Figure 2
Figure 2. Thermal and optical behaviour of 50 nm thick membranes [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p004_2.png] view at source ↗
Figure 3
Figure 3. Steady-state power responsivity RP/α for square membranes resonators. a) Comparison between the analytical models for a distributed source (solid line) and a point-like source (dashed line), alongside FEM simulations (COMSOL Multiphysics) for an IR beam with a 600 µm diameter (rhombuses). b) Experimental measurements (crosses) compared to the distributed source model. The blue band indicates the model’s uncertainty … view at source ↗
Figures from the paper (4 more)
Figure 4
Figure 4. Figure 4: Frequency stability study by means of Allan deviations. a) [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p006_4.png]
Figure 5
Figure 5. Figure 5: The noise equivalent power (NEP) and specific detectivity (D*) of membranes optimized for the second and third harmonic modes. [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p007_5.png]
Figure 1
Figure 1. Figure 1: FTIR spectra of 1 mm membrane covered with a thin Pt layer. a) Reflectance (green line) and transmittance (red line) spectra used [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p009_1.png]
Figure 2
Figure 2. Figure 2: Normalized power responsivity and modeshape relations. a) Normalized responsivity results from FEM simulations when scanning [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p010_2.png]

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

32 extracted references · 31 canonical work pages

  1. [1]

    Infrared detectors: an overview

    Antoni Rogalski. Infrared detectors: an overview. Infrared physics & technology, 43(3-5):187–210, 2002

    work page 2002

  2. [2]

    Detectors—figures of merit

    Panos G Datskos and Nickolay V Lavrik. Detectors—figures of merit. Encyclopedia of Optical Engineering , 349(57), 2003

    work page 2003

  3. [3]

    Can the 300-k radiating background noise limit be attained by uncooled thermal imagers? In Infrared Tech- nology and Applications XXX , volume 5406, pages 437–446

    Paul W Kruse. Can the 300-k radiating background noise limit be attained by uncooled thermal imagers? In Infrared Tech- nology and Applications XXX , volume 5406, pages 437–446. SPIE, 2004

    work page 2004

  4. [4]

    Superconducting bolometer for far-infrared fourier transform spectroscopy

    JT Skidmore, J Gildemeister, AT Lee, MJ Myers, and PL Richards. Superconducting bolometer for far-infrared fourier transform spectroscopy. Applied physics letters , 82(3):469–471, 2003

    work page 2003

  5. [5]

    H. H. Cary. Infrared radiation detector employing tensioned foil to receive radiation. Patent US3 457412A, 7, 1969

    work page 1969

  6. [6]

    Uncooled ir imaging array based on quartz microresonators

    John R Vig, RL Filler, and Y Kim. Uncooled ir imaging array based on quartz microresonators. Journal of Microelectrome- chanical Systems, 5(2):131–137, 1996

    work page 1996

  7. [7]

    Nanome- chanical torsional resonators for frequency-shift infrared ther- mal sensing

    XC Zhang, EB Myers, JE Sader, and ML Roukes. Nanome- chanical torsional resonators for frequency-shift infrared ther- mal sensing. Nano letters, 13(4):1528–1534, 2013

    work page 2013

  8. [8]

    Photothermal infrared spectroscopy of airborne samples with mechanical string resonators

    Shoko Yamada, Silvan Schmid, Tom Larsen, Ole Hansen, and Anja Boisen. Photothermal infrared spectroscopy of airborne samples with mechanical string resonators. Analytical chem- istry, 85(21):10531–10535, 2013

    work page 2013

Show all 32 references
  1. [9]

    High performance nems resonant in- frared detector based on an aluminum nitride nano-plate res- onator

    Y Hui and M Rinaldi. High performance nems resonant in- frared detector based on an aluminum nitride nano-plate res- onator. In 2013 Transducers & Eurosensors XXVII: The 17th International Conference on Solid-State Sensors, Actuators and Microsystems (TRANSDUCERS & EUROSENSORS...

    2013

  2. [10]

    to the detection of visible [11], IR [12], and terahertz (THz) radiation [13, 14]. To maximize the amount of absorbed IR light, a widely used strategy is to exploit the optical properties of metama- terials, such as plasmonic antennas, which reach almost 100% absorptance [13, ...

  3. [11]

    A fast and sensitive room-temperature graphene nanomechanical bolometer

    Andrew Blaikie, David Miller, and Benjamín J Alemán. A fast and sensitive room-temperature graphene nanomechanical bolometer. Nature communications, 10(1):4726, 2019

    2019

  4. [12]

    Thermal ir de- tection with nanoelectromechanical silicon nitride trampoline resonators

    Markus Piller, Johannes Hiesberger, Elisabeth Wistrela, Paolo Martini, Niklas Luhmann, and Silvan Schmid. Thermal ir de- tection with nanoelectromechanical silicon nitride trampoline resonators. IEEE Sensors Journal, 23(2):1066–1071, 2023

    2023

  5. [13]

    Nanoelectromechanical infrared spectroscopy with in situ separation by thermal desorption: Nems-ir-td.ACS sensors, 8(4):1462–1470, 2023

    Niklas Luhmann, Robert G West, Josiane P Lafleur, and Silvan Schmid. Nanoelectromechanical infrared spectroscopy with in situ separation by thermal desorption: Nems-ir-td.ACS sensors, 8(4):1462–1470, 2023

    2023

  6. [14]

    Micromechanical bolometers for subterahertz detection at room temperature

    Leonardo Vicarelli, Alessandro Tredicucci, and Alessandro Pi- tanti. Micromechanical bolometers for subterahertz detection at room temperature. ACS photonics, 9(2):360–367, 2022

    2022

  7. [15]

    Thermodynamically limited uncooled infrared detector using an ultra-low mass perforated subwavelength absorber

    Avijit Das, Merlin L Mah, John Hunt, and Joseph J Talghader. Thermodynamically limited uncooled infrared detector using an ultra-low mass perforated subwavelength absorber. Optica, 10(8):1018–1028, 2023

    2023

  8. [16]

    High detectivity terahertz radia- tion sensing using frequency-noise-optimized nanomechanical resonators

    Chang Zhang, Eeswar K Yalavarthi, Mathieu Giroux, Wei Cui, Michel Stephan, Ali Maleki, Arnaud Weck, Jean-Michel Mé- nard, and Raphael St-Gelais. High detectivity terahertz radia- tion sensing using frequency-noise-optimized nanomechanical resonators. arXiv preprint arXiv:2401....

    2024 arXiv

  9. [17]

    Plasmonic and metamaterial structures as electromagnetic absorbers

    Yanxia Cui, Yingran He, Yi Jin, Fei Ding, Liu Yang, Yuqian Ye, Shoumin Zhong, Yinyue Lin, and Sailing He. Plasmonic and metamaterial structures as electromagnetic absorbers. Laser & Photonics Reviews, 8(4):495–520, 2014

    2014

  10. [18]

    Wavelength-or polarization-selective thermal infrared detectors for multi-color or polarimetric imaging using plasmonics and metamaterials

    Shinpei Ogawa and Masafumi Kimata. Wavelength-or polarization-selective thermal infrared detectors for multi-color or polarimetric imaging using plasmonics and metamaterials. Materials, 10(5):493, 2017

    2017

  11. [20]

    Metamate- rial technologies for miniaturized infrared spectroscopy: Light sources, sensors, filters, detectors, and integration

    Jingxuan Wei, Zhihao Ren, and Chengkuo Lee. Metamate- rial technologies for miniaturized infrared spectroscopy: Light sources, sensors, filters, detectors, and integration. Journal of Applied Physics, 128(24), 2020

    2020

  12. [21]

    Fundamentals of Nanomechanical Resonators

    Silvan Schmid, Luis Guillermo Villanueva, and Michael Lee Roukes. Fundamentals of Nanomechanical Resonators . Springer International Publishing, 2023

    2023

  13. [22]

    Ultrathin 2 nm gold as impedance-matched ab- sorber for infrared light

    Niklas Luhmann, Dennis Høj, Markus Piller, Hendrik Kähler, Miao-Hsuan Chien, Robert G West, Ulrik Lund Andersen, and Silvan Schmid. Ultrathin 2 nm gold as impedance-matched ab- sorber for infrared light. Nature communications, 11(1):2161, 2020

    2020

  14. [23]

    Schemes for tracking resonance fre- 8 quency for micro-and nanomechanical resonators

    Hajrudin Beši ´c, Alper Demir, Johannes Steurer, Niklas Luh- mann, and Silvan Schmid. Schemes for tracking resonance fre- 8 quency for micro-and nanomechanical resonators. Physical Re- view Applied, 20(2):024023, 2023

    2023

  15. [24]

    The detectivity of infrared photodetectors

    S Nudelman. The detectivity of infrared photodetectors. Ap- plied Optics, 1(5):627–636, 1962

    1962

  16. [25]

    Frequency fluctuations in nanomechanical silicon nitride string resonators

    Pedram Sadeghi, Alper Demir, Luis Guillermo Villanueva, Hendrik Kähler, and Silvan Schmid. Frequency fluctuations in nanomechanical silicon nitride string resonators. Physical Review B, 102(21):214106, 2020

    2020

  17. [26]

    All material parameter-based un- certainty is represented in the plot through the colored blue band

    to 14.5 Wm−1 K [27]. All material parameter-based un- certainty is represented in the plot through the colored blue band. The other material parameters for SiN and Pt used for the model are reported in Table I. Building on the findings of Luhmann et al. [19], based on the impe...

  18. [27]

    Performance of detectors for visible and infrared radiation

    R Clark Jones. Performance of detectors for visible and infrared radiation. Advances in Electronics and Electron Physics , 5:1– 96, 1953

    1953

  19. [28]

    West, and Silvan Schmid

    Kostas Kanellopulos, Friedrich Ladinig, Stefan Emminger, Paolo Martini, Robert G. West, and Silvan Schmid. Compar- ative analysis of nanomechanical resonators: Sensitivity, re- sponse time, and practical considerations in photothermal sens- ing, 2024. https://arxiv.org/abs/2406.03295

    2024 arXiv

  20. [29]

    Thermal and electrical conductivity of a suspended platinum nanofilm

    Xing Zhang, Huaqing Xie, Motoo Fujii, Hiroki Ago, Koji Takahashi, Tatsuya Ikuta, Hidekazu Abe, and Tetsuo Shimizu. Thermal and electrical conductivity of a suspended platinum nanofilm. Applied Physics Letters, 86(17), 2005

    2005

  21. [30]

    Thermal and electrical properties of a suspended nanoscale thin film

    X Zhang, HQ Xie, M Fujii, H Ago, K Takahashi, T Ikuta, H Abe, and T Shimizu. Thermal and electrical properties of a suspended nanoscale thin film. International journal of ther- mophysics, 28:33–43, 2007

    2007

  22. [32]

    Laser-based measurements for time and frequency domain ap- plications: a handbook

    Pasquale Maddaloni, Marco Bellini, and Paolo De Natale. Laser-based measurements for time and frequency domain ap- plications: a handbook . CRC Press, 2013

    2013

  23. [33]

    Understanding fundamental trade-offs in nanomechanical resonant sensors

    Alper Demir. Understanding fundamental trade-offs in nanomechanical resonant sensors. Journal of Applied Physics , 129(4), 2021. Supplementary Information: Uncooled Thermal Infrared Detection Near the Fundamental Limit Using a Nanomechanical Resonator with a Broadband Absorber...

    2021 arXiv

  24. [34]

    C. Hilsum. Infrared absorption of thin metal films. J. Opt. Soc. Am., 44(3):188–191, Mar 1954

    1954

Pith tools

Reviewed August 10, 2026 · model on record in the stance chip above.