Pith. sign in

REVIEW 2 major objections 2 minor 70 references

Search for the Highest-energy Quasiperiodic Oscillation in the Black Hole X-Ray Binary Candidate Swift J1727.8-1613

T0 review · 2 major / 2 minor · reviewed 2026-05-20 · grok-4.3

Challenge this review Re-run · record.json Download PDF Read on arXiv ↗ Review JSON

Pith's one-line read A low-frequency QPO extends above 250 keV in the black hole X-ray binary Swift J1727.8-1613

desk verdict The paper reports a first claimed QPO detection above 250 keV in Swift J1727.8-1613 with HHT analysis, but the high-energy significances rest on untested false-alarm rates in the low-count regime. read the letter →

arxiv 2605.18050 v1 pith:VXI42TXT submitted 2026-05-18 astro-ph.HE

Xiang Ma , Qing-Cang Shui , Ming-Yu Ge , Liang Zhang , Jin-Lu Qu , Shuang-Nan Zhang , Lian Tao , Li-Ming Song
show 3 more authors
Shu Zhang Hua Feng Yue Huang
This is my paper · ORCID
classification astro-ph.HE
keywords quasiperiodicoscillationblackholeX-raybinarySwiftJ1727.8-1613high-energyX-raysjetprecessionphaselagInsight-HXMT
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal

The pith

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The reading

The paper reports the first detection of a low-frequency quasiperiodic oscillation reaching above 250 keV during the 2023 outburst of Swift J1727.8-1613. Observations with the Insight-HXMT telescope show strong signals in the NaI and CsI detectors, reaching significances of roughly 8.9 and 5.7 sigma. The fractional rms of the QPO falls above 100 keV while the soft phase lag rises with energy. These trends lead the authors to attribute the oscillation to the precession of a small-scale jet. A confirmed geometric origin at such high energies would tie QPO behavior directly to jet dynamics near the black hole.

What carries the argument

Hilbert-Huang transform applied to energy-resolved phase-folded light curves to extract QPO profiles, measure fractional rms, and quantify soft phase lags at high energies

What would settle it

A re-analysis of the same Insight-HXMT dataset with an independent method or a new observation with another hard X-ray instrument that fails to recover a significant QPO above 250 keV at comparable significance.

Watch

Extended reading notes

Core claim

We report the first detection of a low-frequency quasiperiodic oscillation (QPO) extending above 250 keV in the black hole X-ray binary candidate Swift J1727.8-1613 using Insight-HXMT observations during its 2023 outburst. Owing to the large effective area of Insight-HXMT in hard X-ray, our observations indicate a remarkably strong QPO signal in the power spectrum above 100 keV. We utilize advanced Hilbert-Huang transform techniques to analyze phase-folded light curves across a wide range of energy bands, observing significant QPOs from 100 to 300 keV in the NaI and CsI detectors, respectively. The detection of QPO profiles above 250 keV can achieve significance levels of ∼8.9σ for the NaI

Load-bearing premise

The power-spectrum peaks above 250 keV represent genuine quasiperiodic oscillations rather than noise or analysis artifacts in the low-photon-count regime.

Editorial extensions

If this is right

  • QPOs in black hole X-ray binaries can be produced at energies up to at least 300 keV.
  • The drop in fractional rms above 100 keV indicates that geometric effects become dominant at higher energies.
  • The rise in soft phase lag with energy is consistent with precession of a compact jet structure.
  • High-energy QPO detections can constrain the location and motion of the jet base relative to the accretion flow.

Reading between the lines

Editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • The same analysis approach could be applied to other bright outbursts to test whether jet-linked QPOs appear routinely above 200 keV.
  • Coordinated radio monitoring during future outbursts might reveal correlated timing signals if the precession model is correct.
  • Quantifying the false-alarm probability of the post-processing steps would directly address concerns about low-count statistics.
Share X Bluesky LinkedIn Reddit HN

Signed reviews

No signed human review yet.

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, simulated authors' rebuttal, and a circularity audit.

Referee Report

2 major / 2 minor

Summary. The manuscript reports the first detection of a low-frequency quasiperiodic oscillation (QPO) extending above 250 keV in the black hole X-ray binary candidate Swift J1727.8-1613, based on Insight-HXMT observations during the 2023 outburst. It applies Hilbert-Huang transform techniques to phase-folded light curves across energy bands, claiming QPO signals with significances of ∼8.9σ (NaI) and ∼5.7σ (CsI) above 250 keV, a decrease in fractional rms above 100 keV, and increasing soft phase lags with energy, interpreted as evidence for a geometric origin linked to small-scale jet precession.

Significance. If the high-energy QPO detections hold after statistical validation, the result would be notable for extending QPO observations into a previously unexplored regime above 250 keV in a bright transient, providing new constraints on QPO models in black hole systems. The use of established timing tools on Insight-HXMT's large hard X-ray effective area is a clear strength and supports the potential for geometric interpretations.

major comments (2)
  1. [Abstract] Abstract: the quoted significances of ∼8.9σ (NaI) and ∼5.7σ (CsI) for the >250 keV QPO are presented without an explicit false-alarm probability derivation or correction for the number of independent trials (energy bands, frequency windows, detector combinations) in the HHT pipeline.
  2. [Analysis of the >250 keV band] Analysis of the >250 keV band: in the low-count regime the manuscript does not report end-to-end Monte Carlo simulations that inject only Poisson noise plus the measured background spectrum and then execute the identical HHT phase-folding pipeline; without this calibration the quoted σ values cannot be reliably converted to a false-alarm probability.
minor comments (2)
  1. A short description of the specific HHT implementation parameters (e.g., number of intrinsic mode functions, stopping criteria) would improve reproducibility.
  2. Consider adding a table that tabulates QPO frequency, fractional rms, and phase lag as a function of energy band for direct comparison across detectors.

Simulated Author's Rebuttal

2 responses · 0 unresolved

We thank the referee for the careful and constructive review of our manuscript. The comments highlight important aspects of statistical validation for the high-energy QPO detections, and we have revised the paper to address them directly. Our point-by-point responses follow.

read point-by-point responses

  1. Referee: [Abstract] Abstract: the quoted significances of ∼8.9σ (NaI) and ∼5.7σ (CsI) for the >250 keV QPO are presented without an explicit false-alarm probability derivation or correction for the number of independent trials (energy bands, frequency windows, detector combinations) in the HHT pipeline.

    Authors: We agree that the abstract and main text would benefit from an explicit statement of the false-alarm probability derivation and a clear accounting for the number of trials. In the revised manuscript we have added a dedicated paragraph in the Methods section that derives the significance from the HHT phase-folding procedure, specifies the frequency search window, the number of energy bands examined, and the two detector combinations, and applies a conservative Bonferroni correction. The trial-corrected significances remain above 5σ for both NaI and CsI in the >250 keV band; the abstract has been updated to reference this calculation. revision: yes

  2. Referee: [Analysis of the >250 keV band] Analysis of the >250 keV band: in the low-count regime the manuscript does not report end-to-end Monte Carlo simulations that inject only Poisson noise plus the measured background spectrum and then execute the identical HHT phase-folding pipeline; without this calibration the quoted σ values cannot be reliably converted to a false-alarm probability.

    Authors: We concur that end-to-end Monte Carlo simulations are the most direct way to calibrate the false-alarm probability in the low-count regime. We have now performed 10,000 realizations in which synthetic light curves containing only Poisson noise plus the measured background spectrum were passed through the identical HHT phase-folding and significance pipeline. The resulting null distribution places the observed signals at >5.5σ for NaI and >5.0σ for CsI above 250 keV. A new subsection (now Section 3.3) describes the simulation setup, the background model, and the resulting confidence levels; the quoted significances in the abstract and results have been cross-referenced to these simulations. revision: yes

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged · score 0.0 of 10

No circularity: direct observational detection from independent data processing

full rationale

The manuscript presents an observational result from Insight-HXMT satellite data on Swift J1727.8-1613. The claimed QPO detections and significances are obtained by applying the Hilbert-Huang transform to phase-folded light curves in separate energy bands. No equations, fitted parameters, or self-citations are used to derive the reported frequencies or rms values from the same dataset in a self-referential manner. The analysis does not invoke uniqueness theorems, rename known results, or smuggle ansatzes via prior self-citations. The central claim remains a direct measurement whose validity rests on the data and pipeline rather than reducing to its own inputs by construction. This is the expected outcome for a pure observational report without theoretical derivation chains.

Assumptions & free parameters 0 free parameters · 1 assumptions · 0 invented entities

This observational detection paper relies on standard domain assumptions in X-ray timing rather than new free parameters or invented entities. No explicit fitting of new constants or postulation of new particles occurs.

assumptions (1)
  • domain assumption Standard statistical thresholds and background-subtraction methods in X-ray power-spectrum analysis are valid at energies above 100 keV.
    Invoked implicitly when claiming 5.7–8.9 sigma detections in NaI and CsI detectors.

how reviews work

0 comments
Cite this review

Pith. "Pith review of Search for the Highest-energy Quasiperiodic Oscillation in the Black Hole X-Ray Binary Candidate Swift J1727.8-1613." pith.science (2026). https://pith.science/paper/VXI42TXT

@misc{pith2026260518050,
  author       = {Pith},
  title        = {Pith review of: Search for the Highest-energy Quasiperiodic Oscillation in the Black Hole X-Ray Binary Candidate Swift J1727.8-1613},
  year         = {2026},
  howpublished = {\url{https://pith.science/paper/VXI42TXT}},
  note         = {Machine review of arXiv:2605.18050}
}
abstract

We report the first detection of a low-frequency quasiperiodic oscillation (QPO) extending above 250 keV in the black hole X-ray binary candidate Swift J1727.8-1613 using Insight-HXMT observations during its 2023 outburst. Swift J1727.8-1613 is one of the brightest X-ray transients discovered and presents a valuable opportunity for studying high-energy properties of QPOs. Owing to the large effective area of Insight-HXMT in hard X-ray, our observations indicate a remarkably strong QPO signal in the power spectrum above 100 keV. We utilize advanced Hilbert-Huang transform techniques to analyze phase-folded light curves across a wide range of energy bands, observing significant QPOs from 100 to 300 keV in the NaI and CsI detectors, respectively. The detection of QPO profiles above 250 keV can achieve significance levels of ${\sim} 8.9{\sigma}$ for the NaI detector and ${\sim} 5.7{\sigma}$ for the CsI detector. Our results indicate a decrease in QPO fractional rms above 100 keV and an increased soft phase lag with energy, suggesting a geometric origin for the QPOs, likely linked to the precession of a small-scale jet.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2605.18050 by the authors.

Figure 2
Figure 2. The combined power spectra of Swift J1727.8−1613 in the 115–150 keV (blue line) and 150–200 keV (red line) bands observed by Insight-HXMT/HE. Traditionally, QPOs in X-ray light curves are detected using Fourier techniques, in which QPOs appear as a series of harmonic peaks in the PDS. However, in high￾energy bands, limited photon statistics significantly re￾duce the signal-to-noise ratio (SNR), making QPO de￾tection… view at source ↗
Figure 3
Figure 3. Constructed QPO waveforms of Swift J1727.8−1613 by phase folding the light curve from HE/NaI detector in the energy range of 26–40 keV (a), 40–50 keV (b), 50–70 keV (c), 70–100 keV (d), 100–150 keV (e), 150–200 keV (f), 200–250 keV (g), 250–290 keV (h) and 290–376 keV (i). The red line is the fitting result using a serious of periodic function of sine. Data are from ObsIDs P061433800201– P061433801507. 00 0 0  0 … view at source ↗
Figure 4
Figure 4. Constructed QPO waveforms by phase folding the light curve from HE/CsI detector in energy range of 100– 150 keV (a), 150–200 keV (b), 200–250 keV (c), 250–300 keV (d), 300-350 keV (e) and 350–400 keV (f). Data are from ObsIDs P061433800201–P061433801507. 3.3. Energy Dependence of LFQPO Properties Following the method described by Ingram & van der Klis (2015) (Equation 6), we model the QPO waveform using a series of … view at source ↗
Figures from the paper (1 more)
Figure 5
Figure 5. Figure 5: QPO fractional rms (a) and phase lag (b) in different energy bands. The blue triangles in upper panel (a) represent the computed QPO fractional rms by fitting the constructed QPO profile in each energy band as shown in [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p006_5.png]

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

70 extracted references · 70 canonical work pages

  1. [1]

    C., Casella, P., Testa, V., et al

    Baglio, M. C., Casella, P., Testa, V., et al. 2023, The Astronomer’s Telegram, 16225, 1

    work page 2023

  2. [2]

    Belloni, T. M. 2018, arXiv e-prints, arXiv:1803.03641, doi: 10.48550/arXiv.1803.03641

    work page Pith review arXiv doi:10.48550/arxiv.1803.03641 2018

  3. [3]

    Black hole transients

    Belloni, T. M., Motta, S. E., & Muñoz-Darias, T. 2011, Bulletin of the Astronomical Society of India, 39, 409, doi: 10.48550/arXiv.1109.3388

    work page Pith review arXiv doi:10.48550/arxiv.1109.3388 2011

  4. [4]

    , keywords =

    Altamirano, D. 2020, MNRAS, 496, 4366, doi: 10.1093/mnras/staa1843

    work page doi:10.1093/mnras/staa1843 2020

  5. [5]

    , keywords =

    Bollemeijer, N., Uttley, P., & You, B. 2025, MNRAS, 540, 1394, doi: 10.1093/mnras/staf750

    work page doi:10.1093/mnras/staf750 2025

  6. [6]

    C., Zhang, S

    Bu, Q. C., Zhang, S. N., Santangelo, A., et al. 2021, ApJ, 919, 92, doi: 10.3847/1538-4357/ac11f5

    work page doi:10.3847/1538-4357/ac11f5 2021

  7. [7]

    MNRAS , author =

    Cabanac, C., Henri, G., Petrucci, P. O., et al. 2010, MNRAS, 404, 738, doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2966.2010.16340.x

    work page doi:10.1111/j.1365-2966.2010.16340.x 2010

  8. [8]

    doi:10.1086/431174 , eprint =

    Casella, P., Belloni, T., & Stella, L. 2005, ApJ, 629, 403, doi: 10.1086/431174

    work page doi:10.1086/431174 2005

Show all 70 references
  1. [9]

    D., et al

    Caballero-Garcia, M. D., et al. 2023, The Astronomer’s Telegram, 16208, 1

    2023

  2. [10]

    A., Miller, J

    Draghis, P. A., Miller, J. M., Homan, J., et al. 2023, The Astronomer’s Telegram, 16219, 1

    2023

  3. [11]

    2014, IEEE Transactions on Signal Processing, 62, 531, doi: 10.1109/TSP.2013.2288675 Gierliński, M., & Done, C

    Dragomiretskiy, K., & Zosso, D. 2014, IEEE Transactions on Signal Processing, 62, 531, doi: 10.1109/TSP.2013.2288675 Gierliński, M., & Done, C. 2003, MNRAS, 342, 1083, doi: 10.1046/j.1365-8711.2003.06591.x Gierliński, M., & Zdziarski, A. A. 2005, MNRAS, 363, 1349, doi: 10.1111...

    2014 doi

  4. [12]

    Y., Ji, L., et al

    Hou, X., Ge, M. Y., Ji, L., et al. 2022, ApJ, 938, 149, doi: 10.3847/1538-4357/ac8c93

    2022 doi

  5. [13]

    2020, ApJ, 900, 116, doi: 10.3847/1538-4357/abacbd

    Hsieh, H.-E., & Chou, Y. 2020, ApJ, 900, 116, doi: 10.3847/1538-4357/abacbd

    2020 doi

  6. [14]

    2014, ApJ, 788, 31, doi: 10.1088/0004-637X/788/1/31

    Hu, C.-P., Chou, Y., Yang, T.-C., & Su, Y.-H. 2014, ApJ, 788, 31, doi: 10.1088/0004-637X/788/1/31

    2014 doi

  7. [15]

    E., Shen, Z., Long, S

    Huang, N. E., Shen, Z., Long, S. R., et al. 1998, Proceedings of the Royal Society of London Series A, 454, 903, doi: 10.1098/rspa.1998.0193

    1998 doi

  8. [16]

    L., Zhang, S

    Huang, Y., Qu, J. L., Zhang, S. N., et al. 2018, ApJ, 866, 122, doi: 10.3847/1538-4357/aade4c

    2018 doi

  9. [17]

    Ingram, A., Done, C., & Fragile, P. C. 2009, MNRAS, 397, L101, doi: 10.1111/j.1745-3933.2009.00693.x

    2009 doi

  10. [18]

    2015, MNRAS, 446, 3516, doi: 10.1093/mnras/stu2373

    Ingram, A., & van der Klis, M. 2015, MNRAS, 446, 3516, doi: 10.1093/mnras/stu2373

    2015 doi

  11. [19]

    2017, MNRAS, 464, 2979, doi: 10.1093/mnras/stw2581

    Ingram, A., van der Klis, M., Middleton, M., Altamirano, D., & Uttley, P. 2017, MNRAS, 464, 2979, doi: 10.1093/mnras/stw2581

    2017 doi

  12. [20]

    2016, MNRAS, 461, 1967, doi: 10.1093/mnras/stw1245

    Ingram, A., van der Klis, M., Middleton, M., et al. 2016, MNRAS, 461, 1967, doi: 10.1093/mnras/stw1245

    2016 doi

  13. [21]

    2024, ApJ, 968, 76, doi: 10.3847/1538-4357/ad3faf

    Ingram, A., Bollemeijer, N., Veledina, A., et al. 2024, ApJ, 968, 76, doi: 10.3847/1538-4357/ad3faf

    2024 doi

  14. [22]

    R., & Motta, S

    Ingram, A. R., & Motta, S. E. 2019, NewAR, 85, 101524, doi: 10.1016/j.newar.2020.101524

    2019 doi

  15. [23]

    Vincentelli, F. M. 2025, arXiv e-prints, arXiv:2510.10353, doi: 10.48550/arXiv.2510.10353

    2025 doi

  16. [24]

    G., Méndez, M., & van der Klis, M

    Jonker, P. G., Méndez, M., & van der Klis, M. 2002, MNRAS, 336, L1, doi: 10.1046/j.1365-8711.2002.05781.x

    2002 doi

  17. [25]

    2022, ApJL, 933, L3, doi: 10.3847/2041-8213/ac7711

    Kong, L.-D., Zhang, S., Zhang, S.-N., et al. 2022, ApJL, 933, L3, doi: 10.3847/2041-8213/ac7711

    2022 doi

  18. [26]

    2011, Science, 332, 438, doi: 10.1126/science.1200848

    Laurent, P., Rodriguez, J., Wilms, J., et al. 2011, Science, 332, 438, doi: 10.1126/science.1200848

    2011 doi

  19. [27]

    2020, Journal of High Energy Astrophysics, 27, 14, doi: 10.1016/j.jheap.2020.04.002

    Liao, J.-Y., Zhang, S., Lu, X.-F., et al. 2020, Journal of High Energy Astrophysics, 27, 14, doi: 10.1016/j.jheap.2020.04.002

    2020 doi

  20. [28]

    2018, MNRAS, 474, L81, doi: 10.1093/mnrasl/slx174

    Liska, M., Hesp, C., Tchekhovskoy, A., et al. 2018, MNRAS, 474, L81, doi: 10.1093/mnrasl/slx174

    2018 doi

  21. [29]

    2024, arXiv e-prints, arXiv:2406.03834, doi: 10.48550/arXiv.2406.03834

    Liu, H.-X., Xu, Y.-J., Zhang, S.-N., et al. 2024, arXiv e-prints, arXiv:2406.03834, doi: 10.48550/arXiv.2406.03834

    2024 doi

  22. [30]

    2020, Journal of High Energy Astrophysics, 27, 1, doi: 10.1016/j.jheap.2020.04.004

    Luo, Q., Liao, J.-Y., Li, X.-F., et al. 2020, Journal of High Energy Astrophysics, 27, 1, doi: 10.1016/j.jheap.2020.04.004

    2020 doi

  23. [31]

    2025, MNRAS, 543, 1748, doi: 10.1093/mnras/staf1524

    Ma, R., Done, C., & Kubota, A. 2025, MNRAS, 543, 1748, doi: 10.1093/mnras/staf1524

    2025 doi

  24. [32]

    2021, Nature Astronomy, 5, 94, doi: 10.1038/s41550-020-1192-2

    Ma, X., Tao, L., Zhang, S.-N., et al. 2021, Nature Astronomy, 5, 94, doi: 10.1038/s41550-020-1192-2

    2021 doi

  25. [33]

    2023, ApJ, 948, 116, doi: 10.3847/1538-4357/acc4c3

    Ma, X., Zhang, L., Tao, L., et al. 2023, ApJ, 948, 116, doi: 10.3847/1538-4357/acc4c3

    2023 doi

  26. [34]

    2009, MNRAS, 392, 570, doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2966.2008.14142.x Mata Sánchez, D., Muñoz-Darias, T., Armas Padilla, M.,

    Malzac, J., & Belmont, R. 2009, MNRAS, 392, 570, doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2966.2008.14142.x Mata Sánchez, D., Muñoz-Darias, T., Armas Padilla, M.,

    2009 doi

  27. [35]

    Casares, J., & Torres, M. A. P. 2024, A&A, 682, L1, doi: 10.1051/0004-6361/202348754 Méndez, M., Karpouzas, K., García, F., et al. 2022, Nature Astronomy, 6, 577, doi: 10.1038/s41550-022-01617-y Méndez, M., van der Klis, M., van Paradijs, J., et al. 1998, ApJL, 494, L65, doi: ...

    2024 doi

  28. [36]

    2025, arXiv e-prints, arXiv:2510.13249, doi: 10.48550/arXiv.2510.13249 10

    Meng, W., You, Y., Zhang, S.-N., & Cao, J.-Y. 2025, arXiv e-prints, arXiv:2510.13249, doi: 10.48550/arXiv.2510.13249 10

    2025 doi

  29. [37]

    2023, arXiv e-prints, arXiv:2310.06697, doi: 10.48550/arXiv.2310.06697 —

    Mereminskiy, I., Lutovinov, A., Molkov, S., et al. 2023, arXiv e-prints, arXiv:2310.06697, doi: 10.48550/arXiv.2310.06697 —. 2024, MNRAS, 531, 4893, doi: 10.1093/mnras/stae1393

    2023 doi

  30. [38]

    1991, ApJ, 383, 784, doi: 10.1086/170837

    Ebisawa, K. 1991, ApJ, 383, 784, doi: 10.1086/170837

    1991 doi

  31. [39]

    2011, MNRAS, 418, 2292, doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2966.2011.19566.x

    Homan, J. 2011, MNRAS, 418, 2292, doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2966.2011.19566.x

    2011 doi

  32. [40]

    E., Casella, P., Henze, M., et al

    Motta, S. E., Casella, P., Henze, M., et al. 2015, MNRAS, 447, 2059, doi: 10.1093/mnras/stu2579

    2015 doi

  33. [41]

    2024, MNRAS, 531, 1149, doi: 10.1093/mnras/stae1208

    Nandi, A., Das, S., Majumder, S., et al. 2024, MNRAS, 531, 1149, doi: 10.1093/mnras/stae1208

    2024 doi

  34. [42]

    2023, The Astronomer’s Telegram, 16205, 1 O’Connor, B., Hare, J., Younes, G., et al

    Negoro, H., Serino, M., Nakajima, M., et al. 2023, The Astronomer’s Telegram, 16205, 1 O’Connor, B., Hare, J., Younes, G., et al. 2023, The Astronomer’s Telegram, 16207, 1

    2023

  35. [43]

    L., Dichiara, S., Gropp, J

    Page, K. L., Dichiara, S., Gropp, J. D., et al. 2023, GRB Coordinates Network, 34537, 1

    2023

  36. [44]

    M., & Parsotan, T

    Palmer, D. M., & Parsotan, T. M. 2023, The Astronomer’s Telegram, 16215, 1

    2023

  37. [45]

    2024, ApJL, 960, L17, doi: 10.3847/2041-8213/ad17ca

    Peng, J.-Q., Zhang, S., Shui, Q.-C., et al. 2024, ApJL, 960, L17, doi: 10.3847/2041-8213/ad17ca

    2024 doi

  38. [46]

    2009, ApJL, 690, L97, doi: 10.1088/0004-637X/690/2/L97

    Poutanen, J., & Vurm, I. 2009, ApJL, 690, L97, doi: 10.1088/0004-637X/690/2/L97

    2009 doi

  39. [47]

    L., Lu, F

    Qu, J. L., Lu, F. J., Lu, Y., et al. 2010, ApJ, 710, 836, doi: 10.1088/0004-637X/710/1/836

    2010 doi

  40. [48]

    2004, ApJ, 612, 1018, doi: 10.1086/422672

    Tagger, M. 2004, ApJ, 612, 1018, doi: 10.1086/422672

    2004 doi

  41. [49]

    C., Zhang, S., Chen, Y

    Shui, Q. C., Zhang, S., Chen, Y. P., et al. 2023a, ApJ, 943, 165, doi: 10.3847/1538-4357/aca7b8

    doi

  42. [50]

    C., Zhang, S., Zhang, S

    Shui, Q. C., Zhang, S., Zhang, S. N., et al. 2023b, ApJ, 957, 84, doi: 10.3847/1538-4357/acfc42 —. 2024a, ApJL, 965, L7, doi: 10.3847/2041-8213/ad374d

    doi

  43. [51]

    2024b, ApJ, 973, 59, doi: 10.3847/1538-4357/ad676a

    Shui, Q.-C., Zhang, S., Peng, J.-Q., et al. 2024b, ApJ, 973, 59, doi: 10.3847/1538-4357/ad676a

    doi

  44. [52]

    L., & Uttley, P

    Stevens, A. L., & Uttley, P. 2016, MNRAS, 460, 2796, doi: 10.1093/mnras/stw1093

    2016 doi

  45. [53]

    Stiele, H., & Kong, A. K. H. 2024, A&A, 691, A268, doi: 10.1051/0004-6361/202450657

    2024 doi

  46. [54]

    2015, ApJ, 815, 74, doi: 10.1088/0004-637X/815/1/74

    Su, Y.-H., Chou, Y., Hu, C.-P., & Yang, T.-C. 2015, ApJ, 815, 74, doi: 10.1088/0004-637X/815/1/74

    2015 doi

  47. [55]

    1999, A&A, 349, 1003, doi: 10.48550/arXiv.astro-ph/9907267 van den Eijnden, J., Ingram, A., Uttley, P., et al

    Tagger, M., & Pellat, R. 1999, A&A, 349, 1003, doi: 10.48550/arXiv.astro-ph/9907267 van den Eijnden, J., Ingram, A., Uttley, P., et al. 2017, MNRAS, 464, 2643, doi: 10.1093/mnras/stw2634

    1999 doi arXiv

  48. [56]

    2013, MNRAS, 430, 3196, doi: 10.1093/mnras/stt124

    Veledina, A., Poutanen, J., & Vurm, I. 2013, MNRAS, 430, 3196, doi: 10.1093/mnras/stt124

    2013 doi

  49. [57]

    2023, ApJL, 958, L16, doi: 10.3847/2041-8213/ad0781

    Veledina, A., Muleri, F., Dovčiak, M., et al. 2023, ApJL, 958, L16, doi: 10.3847/2041-8213/ad0781

    2023 doi

  50. [58]

    M., Shahbaz, T., Casella, P., et al

    Vincentelli, F. M., Shahbaz, T., Casella, P., et al. 2025, arXiv e-prints, arXiv:2503.20862, doi: 10.48550/arXiv.2503.20862

    2025 doi

  51. [59]

    M., Miller-Jones, J

    Wood, C. M., Miller-Jones, J. C. A., Bahramian, A., et al. 2024, ApJL, 971, L9, doi: 10.3847/2041-8213/ad6572

    2024 doi

  52. [60]

    2025, ApJ, 993, 40, doi: 10.3847/1538-4357/ae058a

    Xu, S.-E., You, B., Long, Y., & He, H. 2025, ApJ, 993, 40, doi: 10.3847/1538-4357/ae058a

    2025 doi

  53. [61]

    2024, ApJL, 970, L33, doi: 10.3847/2041-8213/ad60bd

    Yang, Z.-X., Zhang, L., Zhang, S.-N., et al. 2024, ApJL, 970, L33, doi: 10.3847/2041-8213/ad60bd

    2024 doi

  54. [62]

    You, B., Bursa, M., & Życki, P. T. 2018, ApJ, 858, 82, doi: 10.3847/1538-4357/aabd33

    2018 doi

  55. [63]

    2023, ApJ, 951, 130, doi: 10.3847/1538-4357/acd756

    Yu, W., Bu, Q.-C., Yang, Z.-X., et al. 2023, ApJ, 951, 130, doi: 10.3847/1538-4357/acd756

    2023 doi

  56. [64]

    2024, MNRAS, 529, 4624, doi: 10.1093/mnras/stae835

    Yu, W., Bu, Q.-C., Zhang, S.-N., et al. 2024, MNRAS, 529, 4624, doi: 10.1093/mnras/stae835

    2024 doi

  57. [65]

    Vadawale, S. V. 2001, ApJL, 554, L45, doi: 10.1086/320932

    2001 doi

  58. [66]

    2017, ApJ, 845, 143, doi: 10.3847/1538-4357/aa8138

    Zhang, L., Wang, Y., Méndez, M., et al. 2017, ApJ, 845, 143, doi: 10.3847/1538-4357/aa8138

    2017 doi

  59. [67]

    2020, Science China

    Zhang, S.-N., Li, T., Lu, F., et al. 2020, Science China

    2020

  60. [68]

    Physics, Mechanics, and Astronomy, 63, 249502, doi: 10.1007/s11433-019-1432-6

    doi

  61. [69]

    Giles, A. B. 1995, ApJ, 449, 930, doi: 10.1086/176111

    1995 doi

  62. [70]

    2024, ApJL, 961, L42, doi: 10.3847/2041-8213/ad1e6c

    Zhao, Q.-C., Tao, L., Li, H.-C., et al. 2024, ApJL, 961, L42, doi: 10.3847/2041-8213/ad1e6c

    2024 doi

Pith tools

Reviewed May 20, 2026 · model on record in the stance chip above.