Pith. sign in

REVIEW 3 major objections 4 minor 194 references

Sources of Inequity and Fairness Risks in Wellbeing Sensing

T0 review · 3 major / 4 minor · reviewed 2026-08-01 · deepseek-v4-flash

Challenge this review Re-run · record.json Download PDF Read on arXiv ↗ Review JSON

Pith's one-line read The paper argues that fairness in passive wellbeing sensing is shaped mainly by five situated sources of inequity—comfort with monitoring, device access, digital literacy, cultural familiarity, and behavioral regularity—so post-hoc identity

desk verdict Solid qualitative study with a useful taxonomy; the abstract's 'systematically' claims more than 14 researcher interviews can support. read the letter →

arxiv 2607.21527 v2 pith:VXVCVWC5 submitted 2026-07-23 cs.HC

Han Zhang , Vedant Das Swain , Koustuv Saha , Anind K. Dey , Jennifer Mankoff This is my paper · ORCID
classification cs.HC
keywords passivesensingwellbeingfairnessinequitylifecyclebehavioralinferencequalitativeinterviewsgovernance
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal

The pith

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The reading

This paper tries to establish that fairness in passive wellbeing sensing—smartphones and wearables that infer stress, depression, or cognitive load—is decided long before a model is trained. Through interviews with 14 researchers and practitioners across five countries, it identifies five situated sources of inequity that cut across identity categories: comfort with monitoring, device and sensor access, digital literacy, cultural familiarity, and behavioral regularity. It maps 15 fairness risks and corresponding mitigations across the full sensing lifecycle and argues that post-hoc identity-based audits miss the main pathways by which unfairness enters. If this account is right, fair practice requires lifecycle-wide attention to representation, burden, and procedural agency, backed by funders, publication venues, ethics boards, and deploying institutions.

What carries the argument

The carrying mechanism is a lifecycle model of the passive sensing pipeline, split into study planning, data preparation, modeling/system design, and deployment, with behavioral inference treated as a fairness-relevant intermediate stage. Within this model, the paper's central objects are the five situated sources of inequity (comfort with monitoring and vulnerability, device and sensor access, digital and data literacy, cultural or linguistic familiarity, and behavioral regularity) and the 15 risk–mitigation pairs, which together explain how representation, burden, and procedural agency get distributed unevenly across the system's lifetime.

What would settle it

A quantitative audit of a deployed sensing system that found identity-based attributes such as race or gender explain more variance in data missingness, dropout, or prediction error than the five situated factors—or a direct survey of data providers showing they do not experience monitoring comfort, device access, literacy, cultural familiarity, or behavioral regularity as sources of unequal treatment—would undercut the paper's central claim.

Watch

Extended reading notes

Core claim

The central discovery is an empirically grounded account of how fairness breaks down in passive wellbeing sensing. The authors interviewed 14 researchers and practitioners across five countries and found that fairness risks cluster around five situated sources of inequity rather than only around demographic identity. They synthesize 15 fairness risks paired with mitigation strategies spanning study planning, data preparation, modeling and system design, and deployment, treating behavioral inference as a distinct stage where unverified interpretations of sensor signals can silently propagate into model errors. The paper also reports that researchers widely recognize these risks but face struc

Load-bearing premise

The taxonomy rests on the assumption that 14 mostly academic researchers from five high-income countries can faithfully report how fairness risks arise—the paper itself notes that the analysis relies solely on researcher accounts rather than the lived experiences of data providers, end users, or domain experts.

Editorial extensions

If this is right

  • If the account is right, fairness audits that compare error rates across demographic groups will keep missing the inequities that matter most, because the operative fault lines are device access, monitoring comfort, literacy, cultural familiarity, and behavioral regularity.
  • Mitigation has to start before data collection: pilot analyses for dropout risk, explicit inclusion targets for situational subgroups, and burden-calibrated study designs.
  • Behavioral inference—converting raw signals into constructs like location entropy—must be validated against participants' lived experience rather than treated as routine preprocessing or feature engineering.
  • Deploying institutions such as hospitals, universities, and employers acquire ongoing obligations to monitor post-deployment disparities, provide meaningful recourse, and disclose system limitations.
  • Funders and publication venues should require fairness documentation and pre-registered protocols, because individual researcher goodwill is systematically overridden by existing incentive structures.

Reading between the lines

Editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • Beyond the paper: the five situated sources could be operationalized as measurable covariates—for example, dropout-risk scores based on monitoring comfort or device class—and fed into quantitative fairness audits, giving the interview findings a direct testable form.
  • Beyond the paper: the lifecycle-situated framing likely transfers to other longitudinal or sensor-heavy ML domains, such as workplace productivity analytics or digital phenotyping for clinical trials, where similar upstream inference and burden dynamics appear.
  • Beyond the paper: if behavioral regularity is as powerful a driver of model error as the interviews suggest, existing sensing datasets could be re-analyzed to check whether irregular-routine participants show systematically higher prediction error; that is a low-cost, direct test of the paper's central claim.
Share X Bluesky LinkedIn Reddit HN

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, and a circularity audit.

Referee Report

3 major / 4 minor

Summary. The paper reports semi-structured interviews with 14 passive-sensing researchers and practitioners across five countries (Australia, Canada, Japan, Korea, U.S.) to understand how fairness risks arise in wellbeing sensing beyond post-hoc identity-based model audits. It identifies five situated sources of inequity (comfort with monitoring/vulnerability, device/sensor access, digital/data literacy, cultural/linguistic familiarity, behavioral regularity), synthesizes 15 lifecycle-stage fairness risks with mitigation strategies (Table 1, Figure 1), and documents structural/institutional barriers that constrain fair practice. It concludes that fair passive sensing requires not only individual researcher effort but also ecosystem-level governance from funders, publication venues, IRBs, and deploying institutions. The paper includes the full interview protocol, participant demographics, and a detailed account of the thematic analysis process.

Significance. The contribution is potentially valuable: it extends fairness discourse beyond model-level audits to the full sensing lifecycle, grounds the discussion in practitioner accounts, and produces a concrete risk/mitigation table that could guide future work and governance. The study is transparent about its methods and limitations, and the thematic analysis uses multiple coding rounds with independent coding and discrepancy resolution, which supports credibility. The paper does not offer formal metrics or machine-checkable artifacts; its contribution is qualitative and interpretive. The main risk is that the strength of the central claim ('systematically shape fairness risks beyond identity-based attributes') exceeds what the evidence can support, given the small researcher-only, high-income-country sample and the absence of saturation or member-checking evidence.

major comments (3)
  1. [Abstract; Findings (Situated Sources of Inequity); Limitations] The central claim that five situated sources 'systematically shape fairness risks beyond identity-based attributes' is stronger than the evidence presented. The empirical basis is 14 self-selected, network-recruited researchers/practitioners, 11 from academia, all in five high-income countries. The paper itself states that it 'relies solely on researcher accounts rather than the lived experiences of data providers, end users, or domain experts.' No saturation analysis or member checking is reported. A qualitative sample of this size and composition can identify plausible mechanisms and recurring concerns within the sample, but cannot establish that these five sources are the systematic drivers of inequity in passive sensing generally. This overreach matters because the governance implications in the Discussion rest on the systematicity of the identified sources. Please either temper the
  2. [Procedure (Part 3); Table 1; Figure 1] The lifecycle framing may be partially an artifact of the research instrument. Participants were asked in Part 2, 'Which step(s) in the pipeline present potential fairness risks?' and in Part 3 were asked to annotate their pipeline diagram using a draft lifecycle-aware fairness framework adapted from the authors' prior work (Zhang et al. 2023). The four-phase structure in Table 1 and Figure 1 closely mirrors this scaffold. The paper should explain how the analysis distinguished participant-emergent themes from responses elicited by the lifecycle prompts, and should explicitly acknowledge this potential confirmatory bias. This does not invalidate the findings, but it is load-bearing for the claim that the lifecycle taxonomy is empirically grounded rather than imposed by the interview design.
  3. [Recruitment & Participants; Limitations] The 'five countries' framing overstates diversity: all five are high-income countries, and the cultural/linguistic examples are drawn from international students or workers within those countries, not from low- or middle-income settings. Missing perspectives from data providers with disabilities, low-income users, or people under institutional surveillance may yield additional sources of inequity (e.g., accessibility barriers, coercion, stigma) not captured here. At minimum, the paper should describe the sample as 'researcher perspectives from five high-income countries' and qualify claims about cultural drivers to the contexts actually studied. This is a scope limitation, but it directly affects the completeness of the proposed taxonomy.
minor comments (4)
  1. [Data Analysis] The coding process is described in detail, but no inter-coder reliability statistic or saturation metric is reported. For a thematic analysis this is not mandatory, but one sentence on how the authors judged that themes were stable would strengthen the systematicity claim.
  2. [Table 1] The table is dense and mixes risks, mitigation strategies, and stakeholder actions. Consider separating the 'Potential Risks' and 'Mitigation Strategies' columns visually or using a full-page layout; the current format is hard to read in a two-column article.
  3. [Discussion and Conclusion] The reference to the authors' own prior framework (Zhang et al. 2023) is appropriate, but the degree to which that framework influenced the interview instrument and analysis should be stated in the main text, not only in the Procedure section.
  4. [Screening Survey Questions] The screening survey asks whether participants have 'explicitly considered fairness-related concerns.' This could prime later responses about fairness awareness; this is worth a sentence in Limitations as a potential social-desirability bias.

Circularity Check

1 steps flagged · score 2.0 of 10

Mild self-referentiality from using the authors' own 2023 framework as an interview prompt, but the central taxonomy is independent, quote-grounded coding output; no reduction-by-construction.

  1. other [Procedure (Interview Study), Part 3; Interview Questions appendix (Part 3: Opportunities & Feedback)]
    "In Part 3, participants revisited their pipeline diagrams to annotate fairness risks and mitigation strategies stage by stage, then provided feedback on a draft lifecycle-aware fairness framework adapted from prior work (Zhang et al. 2023)."

    The framework used as a validation prompt is the authors' own prior work (Zhang, Wang, Sheng, Xu, Mankoff, Dey 2023). Participants were asked to critique it, and the paper's synthesized lifecycle map partially echoes it, making the validation mildly self-referential. However, it is not load-bearing: the five sources and 15 risks are grounded in direct participant quotes (P2, P4, P7, P8, P11, P14, etc.) and emerged from three rounds of thematic coding across all interview parts; the paper also explicitly notes which risks arose unprompted versus only when probed. No quantitative prediction reduces to a fit.

full rationale

This is a qualitative interview study with no mathematical derivation, so the circularity test is whether the claimed findings reduce to their inputs. The central claims—five situated sources of inequity and 15 lifecycle fairness risks—are thematic-analysis outputs supported by participant quotes, and the paper describes them as emerging from iterative coding ('One author began by reading all transcripts... drafted an initial codebook'; 'Three rounds of collaborative coding followed'). The finding that risks 'accumulate and transform across the system lifecycle' could partly reflect the instrument, which asked participants to map risks onto pipeline stages, but the paper is transparent about elicitation effects (e.g., behavioral-inference risks surfaced only when explicitly probed, unlike other stages). The only self-citation is the adaptation of the authors' own 2023 fair-ubiquitous-computing framework in Part 3 as a feedback prompt; this makes the validation mildly self-referential but not load-bearing, because the taxonomy rests on participant accounts and the framework feedback is one input among many. The acknowledged limitations—14 interviewees, researcher-only accounts, high-income countries—are generalizability and correctness concerns, not circularity. Under the rubric, this is a normal honest non-finding of significant circularity, with one minor self-referential instrument element noted.

Assumptions & free parameters 0 free parameters · 4 assumptions · 0 invented entities

No numeric parameters or new entities. The empirical burden sits on qualitative sampling and interpretation assumptions listed above.

assumptions (4)
  • domain assumption Interview self-reports are treated as evidence about actual fairness risks and practices in passive sensing.
    The central findings (five sources, 15 risks) rest on participants' descriptions of their own studies; these descriptions are not independently verified (Limitations: 'analysis relies solely on researcher accounts').
  • domain assumption The five-phase Thematic Analysis by Braun and Clarke yields categories that accurately reflect participants' views.
    The coding process (three rounds, inter-coder consensus) is standard but no codebook or inter-rater reliability statistic is reported, so category stability is assumed (Data Analysis).
  • domain assumption A sample of 14 participants across five countries is sufficient to identify recurring patterns for a taxonomy.
    No saturation analysis is reported; the paper notes the sample 'is not intended to be statistically representative' (Limitations).
  • domain assumption Prior lifecycle fairness frameworks (e.g., Suresh & Guttag 2019; Selbst et al. 2019) and the authors' own 2023 framework provide a sound basis for the lifecycle structure.
    The interview instrument Part 3 uses a draft framework adapted from Zhang et al. 2023; conclusions inherit assumptions from that framework.

how reviews work

0 comments
Cite this review

Pith. "Pith review of Sources of Inequity and Fairness Risks in Wellbeing Sensing." pith.science (2026). https://pith.science/paper/VXVCVWC5

@misc{pith2026260721527,
  author       = {Pith},
  title        = {Pith review of: Sources of Inequity and Fairness Risks in Wellbeing Sensing},
  year         = {2026},
  howpublished = {\url{https://pith.science/paper/VXVCVWC5}},
  note         = {Machine review of arXiv:2607.21527}
}
read the original abstract

Passive sensing for wellbeing uses smartphones and wearables to continuously collect human behavioral data and applies ML/AI models to infer psychological states and behaviors (e.g., depression, cognitive load). These systems are increasingly adopted in high-stakes settings (e.g., hospitals, universities), yet fairness research remains limited---primarily to post-hoc, identity-based comparisons of model performance. However, passive sensing combines heterogeneous sensing infrastructures, indirect behavioral inference, and longitudinal deployment---characteristics that, while not exclusive to the domain, are jointly pronounced here and raise two underexplored questions: (1) what additional sources of inequity arise from these characteristics, and (2) how do such inequities propagate beyond algorithmic audits across the system lifecycle? To address this gap, we conducted semi-structured interviews with 14 researchers and practitioners across five countries, examining how fairness risks emerge and are negotiated across the full passive sensing lifecycle. Our findings empirically characterize five situated sources of inequity (e.g., comfort with monitoring, behavioral regularity) that systematically shape fairness risks beyond identity-based attributes. We further synthesize 15 fairness risks and corresponding mitigation strategies across the lifecycle, from study design to deployment. Finally, we identify structural barriers that constrain fair practice in reality, and argue that enabling fair passive sensing requires both individual researcher efforts and ecosystem-level governance support from funders, publication venues, and deploying institutions.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2607.21527 by the authors.

Figure 1
Figure 1. Overview of fairness risks and mitigation strategies across the passive sensing lifecycle. The lifecycle spans four [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p002_1.png] view at source ↗

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

194 extracted references · 3 linked inside Pith

  1. [1]

    Using thematic analysis in psychology , journal =

    Braun, Virginia and Clarke, Victoria , year =. Using thematic analysis in psychology , journal =

  2. [2]

    interactions , year=

    Contextual design , author=. interactions , year=

  3. [3]

    Adjunct proceedings of the 2023 ACM international joint conference on pervasive and ubiquitous computing & the 2023 ACM international symposium on wearable computing , pages=

    A framework for designing fair ubiquitous computing systems , author=. Adjunct proceedings of the 2023 ACM international joint conference on pervasive and ubiquitous computing & the 2023 ACM international symposium on wearable computing , pages=

    2023

  4. [4]

    Big data's disparate impact , author=. Calif. L. Rev. , volume=. 2016 , publisher=

    2016

  5. [5]

    Proceedings of the 29th ACM symposium on virtual reality software and technology , pages=

    Cognitive load measurement with physiological sensors in virtual reality during physical activity , author=. Proceedings of the 29th ACM symposium on virtual reality software and technology , pages=

  6. [6]

    2022 10th International Conference on Affective Computing and Intelligent Interaction (ACII) , pages=

    Advancing the understanding and measurement of workplace stress in remote information workers from passive sensors and behavioral data , author=. 2022 10th International Conference on Affective Computing and Intelligent Interaction (ACII) , pages=. 2022 , organization=

    2022

  7. [7]

    Proceedings of the 13th EAI international conference on pervasive computing technologies for healthcare , pages=

    Passive mobile sensing and psychological traits for large scale mood prediction , author=. Proceedings of the 13th EAI international conference on pervasive computing technologies for healthcare , pages=

  8. [8]

    Sensors , volume=

    Passive sensing of prediction of moment-to-moment depressed mood among undergraduates with clinical levels of depression sample using smartphones , author=. Sensors , volume=. 2020 , publisher=

    2020

Show all 194 references
  1. [9]

    International Journal of Marketing Studies , volume=

    The comparative study of the relationship between smartphone choice and socio-economic indicators , author=. International Journal of Marketing Studies , volume=

  2. [10]

    Proceedings of the 2018 10th International Conference on Information Management and Engineering , pages=

    Smart4gap: Factors that influence smartphone security decisions in developing and developed countries , author=. Proceedings of the 2018 10th International Conference on Information Management and Engineering , pages=

    2018

  3. [11]

    2024 , school=

    Toward the integration of behavioral sensing and artificial intelligence , author=. 2024 , school=

    2024

  4. [12]

    JMIR mHealth and uHealth , volume=

    Predicting early warning signs of psychotic relapse from passive sensing data: an approach using encoder-decoder neural networks , author=. JMIR mHealth and uHealth , volume=. 2020 , publisher=

    2020

  5. [13]

    Proceedings of the 2022 CHI conference on human factors in computing systems , pages=

    Semantic gap in predicting mental wellbeing through passive sensing , author=. Proceedings of the 2022 CHI conference on human factors in computing systems , pages=

    2022

  6. [14]

    Proceedings of the ACM on Interactive, Mobile, Wearable and Ubiquitous Technologies , volume=

    Prediction of mood instability with passive sensing , author=. Proceedings of the ACM on Interactive, Mobile, Wearable and Ubiquitous Technologies , volume=. 2019 , publisher=

    2019

  7. [15]

    Proceedings of the 2019 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems , pages=

    Continuous alertness assessments: Using EOG glasses to unobtrusively monitor fatigue levels In-The-Wild , author=. Proceedings of the 2019 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems , pages=

    2019

  8. [16]

    Proceedings of the ACM on Human-computer Interaction , volume=

    Burnout and the quantified workplace: tensions around personal sensing interventions for stress in resident physicians , author=. Proceedings of the ACM on Human-computer Interaction , volume=. 2022 , publisher=

    2022

  9. [17]

    Proceedings of the ACM on Interactive, Mobile, Wearable and Ubiquitous Technologies , volume=

    Differentiating higher and lower job performers in the workplace using mobile sensing , author=. Proceedings of the ACM on Interactive, Mobile, Wearable and Ubiquitous Technologies , volume=. 2019 , publisher=

    2019

  10. [18]

    IEEE Pervasive Computing , volume=

    Assessing the impact of commuting on workplace performance using mobile sensing , author=. IEEE Pervasive Computing , volume=. 2021 , publisher=

    2021

  11. [19]

    JMIR mental health , volume=

    Toward tailoring just-in-time adaptive intervention systems for workplace stress reduction: exploratory analysis of intervention implementation , author=. JMIR mental health , volume=. 2024 , publisher=

    2024

  12. [20]

    Journal of information processing , volume=

    Sensing and changing human behavior for workplace wellness , author=. Journal of information processing , volume=. 2019 , publisher=

    2019

  13. [21]

    ACM Transactions on Computing for Healthcare , volume=

    Food, mood, context: Examining college students’ eating context and mental well-being , author=. ACM Transactions on Computing for Healthcare , volume=. 2022 , publisher=

    2022

  14. [22]

    Proceedings of the 2014 ACM international joint conference on pervasive and ubiquitous computing , pages=

    StudentLife: assessing mental health, academic performance and behavioral trends of college students using smartphones , author=. Proceedings of the 2014 ACM international joint conference on pervasive and ubiquitous computing , pages=

    2014

  15. [23]

    JMIR formative research , volume=

    Fairness in mobile phone--based mental health assessment algorithms: Exploratory study , author=. JMIR formative research , volume=. 2022 , publisher=

    2022

  16. [24]

    2012 , howpublished=

    Figma: The Collective Interface Design Tool , author=. 2012 , howpublished=

    2012

  17. [25]

    2018 , howpublished=

    Federal Policy for the Protection of Human Subjects ('Common Rule') , author =. 2018 , howpublished=

    2018

  18. [26]

    Journal of Building Engineering , volume=

    Spatial distribution of CO2 impact on the indoor air quality of classrooms within a university , author=. Journal of Building Engineering , volume=. 2024 , publisher=

    2024

  19. [27]

    Window performance for human thermal comfort , author=

  20. [28]

    2013 , howpublished=

    Thermal Environmental Conditions for Human Occupancy , author=. 2013 , howpublished=

    2013

  21. [29]

    The morality of law , author=

  22. [30]

    (No Title) , year=

    Due process in the administrative state , author=. (No Title) , year=

  23. [31]

    2020 , institution=

    Exploring fairness in machine learning for international development , author=. 2020 , institution=

    2020

  24. [32]

    Proceedings of the ACM on Human-Computer Interaction , volume=

    Being trustworthy is not enough: How untrustworthy artificial intelligence (AI) can deceive the end-users and gain their trust , author=. Proceedings of the ACM on Human-Computer Interaction , volume=. 2023 , publisher=

    2023

  25. [33]

    International Journal of Human--Computer Interaction , volume =

    Human-centered artificial intelligence: Reliable, safe & trustworthy , author =. International Journal of Human--Computer Interaction , volume =. 2020 , publisher =

    2020

  26. [34]

    Artificial Intelligence , volume =

    Explanation in artificial intelligence: Insights from the social sciences , author =. Artificial Intelligence , volume =. 2019 , publisher =

    2019

  27. [35]

    Proceedings of the Conference on Fairness, Accountability, and Transparency , pages =

    Fairness and abstraction in sociotechnical systems , author =. Proceedings of the Conference on Fairness, Accountability, and Transparency , pages =

  28. [36]

    Washington Law Review , volume =

    Privacy as contextual integrity , author =. Washington Law Review , volume =

  29. [37]

    arXiv preprint arXiv:1901.10002 , year =

    A framework for understanding unintended consequences of machine learning , author =. arXiv preprint arXiv:1901.10002 , year =

    1901 arXiv

  30. [38]

    Annual review of clinical psychology , volume=

    Ambulatory assessment , author=. Annual review of clinical psychology , volume=. 2013 , publisher=

    2013

  31. [39]

    Proceedings of the 2024 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems , pages=

    Learning about social context from smartphone data: Generalization across countries and daily Life moments , author=. Proceedings of the 2024 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems , pages=

    2024

  32. [40]

    Perspectives on Psychological Science , volume=

    Using smartphones to collect behavioral data in psychological science: Opportunities, practical considerations, and challenges , author=. Perspectives on Psychological Science , volume=. 2016 , publisher=

    2016

  33. [41]

    Ecological momentary assessment , author=. Annu. Rev. Clin. Psychol. , volume=. 2008 , publisher=

    2008

  34. [42]

    BMC psychiatry , volume=

    Reactivity to smartphone-based ecological momentary assessment of depressive symptoms (MoodMonitor): protocol of a randomised controlled trial , author=. BMC psychiatry , volume=. 2016 , publisher=

    2016

  35. [43]

    Journal of medical Internet research , volume=

    Compliance with mobile ecological momentary assessment protocols in children and adolescents: a systematic review and meta-analysis , author=. Journal of medical Internet research , volume=. 2017 , publisher=

    2017

  36. [44]

    ACM Computing Surveys (CSUR) , volume=

    The experience sampling method on mobile devices , author=. ACM Computing Surveys (CSUR) , volume=. 2017 , publisher=

    2017

  37. [45]

    Proceedings of the conference on fairness, accountability, and transparency , pages=

    Problem formulation and fairness , author=. Proceedings of the conference on fairness, accountability, and transparency , pages=

  38. [46]

    Proceedings of the 2023 AAAI/ACM Conference on AI, Ethics, and Society , pages=

    Sociotechnical harms of algorithmic systems: Scoping a taxonomy for harm reduction , author=. Proceedings of the 2023 AAAI/ACM Conference on AI, Ethics, and Society , pages=

    2023

  39. [47]

    Bulletin of the World Health Organization , volume=

    The preamble of the constitution of the World Health Organization , author=. Bulletin of the World Health Organization , volume=. 2002 , publisher=

    2002

  40. [48]

    The Lancet Child & Adolescent Health , volume=

    Making every school a health-promoting school , author=. The Lancet Child & Adolescent Health , volume=. 2021 , publisher=

    2021

  41. [49]

    2022 , publisher=

    WHO guidelines on mental health at work , author=. 2022 , publisher=

    2022

  42. [50]

    Proceedings of the conference on fairness, accountability, and transparency , pages=

    Actionable recourse in linear classification , author=. Proceedings of the conference on fairness, accountability, and transparency , pages=

  43. [51]

    Proceedings of the ACM on human-computer interaction , volume=

    WeBuildAI: Participatory framework for algorithmic governance , author=. Proceedings of the ACM on human-computer interaction , volume=. 2019 , publisher=

    2019

  44. [52]

    International conference on machine learning , pages=

    Preventing fairness gerrymandering: Auditing and learning for subgroup fairness , author=. International conference on machine learning , pages=. 2018 , organization=

    2018

  45. [53]

    Everyone wants to do the model work, not the data work

    “Everyone wants to do the model work, not the data work”: Data Cascades in High-Stakes AI , author=. proceedings of the 2021 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems , pages=

    2021

  46. [54]

    Patterns , volume=

    Data and its (dis) contents: A survey of dataset development and use in machine learning research , author=. Patterns , volume=. 2021 , publisher=

    2021

  47. [55]

    Proceedings of the 1st ACM Conference on Equity and Access in Algorithms, Mechanisms, and Optimization , pages=

    A framework for understanding sources of harm throughout the machine learning life cycle , author=. Proceedings of the 1st ACM Conference on Equity and Access in Algorithms, Mechanisms, and Optimization , pages=

  48. [56]

    npj Digital Medicine , volume =

    Characterizing the Clinical Relevance of Digital Phenotyping Data Quality with Applications to a Cohort with Schizophrenia , author =. npj Digital Medicine , volume =. 2018 , doi =

    2018

  49. [57]

    AJOB empirical bioethics , volume=

    Ethical and regulatory challenges of research using pervasive sensing and other emerging technologies: IRB perspectives , author=. AJOB empirical bioethics , volume=. 2017 , publisher=

    2017

  50. [58]

    Extended Abstracts of the 2019 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems , pages=

    The tesserae project: Large-scale, longitudinal, in situ, multimodal sensing of information workers , author=. Extended Abstracts of the 2019 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems , pages=

    2019

  51. [59]

    Royal society open science , volume=

    Human-centred artificial intelligence for mobile health sensing: challenges and opportunities , author=. Royal society open science , volume=. 2023 , publisher=

    2023

  52. [60]

    Proceedings of the ACM on Interactive, Mobile, Wearable and Ubiquitous Technologies , volume=

    EduSense: Practical classroom sensing at Scale , author=. Proceedings of the ACM on Interactive, Mobile, Wearable and Ubiquitous Technologies , volume=. 2019 , publisher=

    2019

  53. [61]

    2014 IEEE Healthcare Innovation Conference (HIC) , pages=

    Using phone-based activity monitors to promote physical activity in older adults: A pilot study , author=. 2014 IEEE Healthcare Innovation Conference (HIC) , pages=. 2014 , organization=

    2014

  54. [62]

    Journal of medical Internet research , volume=

    Exploring the experiences of community-dwelling older adults on using wearable monitoring devices with regular support from community health workers, nurses, and social workers: qualitative descriptive study , author=. Journal of medical Internet research , volume=. 2024 , publisher=

    2024

  55. [63]

    The Journal of Frailty & Aging , volume=

    Wearable technologies for healthy ageing: prospects, challenges, and ethical considerations , author=. The Journal of Frailty & Aging , volume=. 2024 , publisher=

    2024

  56. [64]

    Computer , volume=

    Tracking mental well-being: Balancing rich sensing and patient needs , author=. Computer , volume=. 2014 , publisher=

    2014

  57. [65]

    Proceedings of the 2015 ACM international joint conference on pervasive and ubiquitous computing , pages=

    MyBehavior: automatic personalized health feedback from user behaviors and preferences using smartphones , author=. Proceedings of the 2015 ACM international joint conference on pervasive and ubiquitous computing , pages=

    2015

  58. [66]

    arXiv preprint arXiv:1812.10394 , year=

    Extraction of behavioral features from smartphone and wearable data , author=. arXiv preprint arXiv:1812.10394 , year=

    arXiv

  59. [67]

    Proceedings of the ACM on Interactive, Mobile, Wearable and Ubiquitous Technologies , volume=

    ComFeel: Productivity is a matter of the senses too , author=. Proceedings of the ACM on Interactive, Mobile, Wearable and Ubiquitous Technologies , volume=. 2020 , publisher=

    2020

  60. [68]

    arXiv preprint arXiv:2411.09706 , year=

    AI-driven feedback loops in digital technologies: Psychological impacts on user behaviour and well-being , author=. arXiv preprint arXiv:2411.09706 , year=

    arXiv

  61. [69]

    Proceedings of the 2023 ACM conference on fairness, accountability, and transparency , pages=

    Can workers meaningfully consent to workplace wellbeing technologies? , author=. Proceedings of the 2023 ACM conference on fairness, accountability, and transparency , pages=

    2023

  62. [70]

    The American Journal of Bioethics , volume=

    Returning individual research results from digital phenotyping in psychiatry , author=. The American Journal of Bioethics , volume=. 2024 , publisher=

    2024

  63. [71]

    Proceedings of the ACM on Interactive, Mobile, Wearable and Ubiquitous Technologies , volume=

    A multisensor person-centered approach to understand the role of daily activities in job performance with organizational personas , author=. Proceedings of the ACM on Interactive, Mobile, Wearable and Ubiquitous Technologies , volume=. 2019 , publisher=

    2019

  64. [72]

    npj Mental Health Research , volume=

    Developing personalized algorithms for sensing mental health symptoms in daily life , author=. npj Mental Health Research , volume=. 2025 , publisher=

    2025

  65. [73]

    JMIR mHealth and uHealth , volume=

    Identifying behavioral phenotypes of loneliness and social isolation with passive sensing: statistical analysis, data mining and machine learning of smartphone and fitbit data , author=. JMIR mHealth and uHealth , volume=. 2019 , publisher=

    2019

  66. [74]

    Journal of Medical Internet Research , volume=

    The relation between passively collected GPS mobility metrics and depressive symptoms: systematic review and meta-analysis , author=. Journal of Medical Internet Research , volume=. 2024 , publisher=

    2024

  67. [75]

    NPJ Digital Medicine , volume=

    The comprehensive clinical benefits of digital phenotyping: from broad adoption to full impact , author=. NPJ Digital Medicine , volume=. 2025 , publisher=

    2025

  68. [76]

    Journal of medical Internet research , volume=

    Sensing apps and public data sets for digital phenotyping of mental health: systematic review , author=. Journal of medical Internet research , volume=. 2022 , publisher=

    2022

  69. [77]

    Frontiers in digital health , volume=

    Wearable, environmental, and smartphone-based passive sensing for mental health monitoring , author=. Frontiers in digital health , volume=. 2021 , publisher=

    2021

  70. [78]

    JMIR mental health , volume=

    mHealth for schizophrenia: patient engagement with a mobile phone intervention following hospital discharge , author=. JMIR mental health , volume=. 2016 , publisher=

    2016

  71. [79]

    , author=

    CrossCheck: Integrating self-report, behavioral sensing, and smartphone use to identify digital indicators of psychotic relapse. , author=. Psychiatric rehabilitation journal , volume=. 2017 , publisher=

    2017

  72. [80]

    Proceeding of the 11th annual international conference on Mobile systems, applications, and services , pages=

    Moodscope: Building a mood sensor from smartphone usage patterns , author=. Proceeding of the 11th annual international conference on Mobile systems, applications, and services , pages=

  73. [81]

    Journal of medical Internet research , volume=

    Mental health and behavior of college students during the COVID-19 pandemic: longitudinal mobile smartphone and ecological momentary assessment study, part II , author=. Journal of medical Internet research , volume=. 2021 , publisher=

    2021

  74. [82]

    Journal of medical Internet research , volume=

    Mental health and behavior of college students during the early phases of the COVID-19 pandemic: Longitudinal smartphone and ecological momentary assessment study , author=. Journal of medical Internet research , volume=. 2020 , publisher=

    2020

  75. [83]

    Journal of Biomedical Informatics , volume=

    Digital phenotyping of mental health using multimodal sensing of multiple situations of interest: a systematic literature review , author=. Journal of Biomedical Informatics , volume=. 2023 , publisher=

    2023

  76. [84]

    Psychiatry Research , pages=

    Smartphone digital phenotyping in mental health disorders: A review of raw sensors utilized, machine learning processing pipelines, and derived behavioral features , author=. Psychiatry Research , pages=. 2025 , publisher=

    2025

  77. [85]

    npj Digital Medicine , volume=

    Advancing digital sensing in mental health research , author=. npj Digital Medicine , volume=. 2024 , publisher=

    2024

  78. [86]

    Artificial Intelligence Review , volume=

    Digital phenotypes and digital biomarkers for health and diseases: a systematic review of machine learning approaches utilizing passive non-invasive signals collected via wearable devices and smartphones , author=. Artificial Intelligence Review , volume=. 2024 , publisher=

    2024

  79. [87]

    IEEE Access , volume=

    Smartphone sensing for the well-being of young adults: A review , author=. IEEE Access , volume=. 2020 , publisher=

    2020

  80. [88]

    Frontiers in ICT , volume=

    AWARE: mobile context instrumentation framework , author=. Frontiers in ICT , volume=. 2015 , publisher=

    2015

  81. [89]

    Current opinion in behavioral sciences , volume=

    Smartphone sensing methods for studying behavior in everyday life , author=. Current opinion in behavioral sciences , volume=. 2017 , publisher=

    2017

  82. [90]

    Journal of personalized medicine , volume=

    Accuracy in wrist-worn, sensor-based measurements of heart rate and energy expenditure in a diverse cohort , author=. Journal of personalized medicine , volume=. 2017 , publisher=

    2017

  83. [91]

    Annual review of clinical psychology , volume=

    Personal sensing: understanding mental health using ubiquitous sensors and machine learning , author=. Annual review of clinical psychology , volume=. 2017 , publisher=

    2017

  84. [92]

    Journal of biomedical informatics , volume=

    Systematic review of smartphone-based passive sensing for health and wellbeing , author=. Journal of biomedical informatics , volume=. 2018 , publisher=

    2018

  85. [93]

    Proceedings of the 2019 chi conference on human factors in computing systems , pages=

    Guidelines for human-AI interaction , author=. Proceedings of the 2019 chi conference on human factors in computing systems , pages=

    2019

  86. [94]

    Proceedings of the conference on fairness, accountability, and transparency , pages=

    Model cards for model reporting , author=. Proceedings of the conference on fairness, accountability, and transparency , pages=

  87. [95]

    Proceedings of the 2020 CHI conference on human factors in computing systems , pages=

    Co-designing checklists to understand organizational challenges and opportunities around fairness in AI , author=. Proceedings of the 2020 CHI conference on human factors in computing systems , pages=

    2020

  88. [96]

    Proceedings of the 2019 CHI conference on human factors in computing systems , pages=

    Improving fairness in machine learning systems: What do industry practitioners need? , author=. Proceedings of the 2019 CHI conference on human factors in computing systems , pages=

    2019

  89. [97]

    Proceedings of the 2018 chi conference on human factors in computing systems , pages=

    Fairness and accountability design needs for algorithmic support in high-stakes public sector decision-making , author=. Proceedings of the 2018 chi conference on human factors in computing systems , pages=

    2018

  90. [98]

    NPJ digital medicine , volume=

    Digital twins for health: a scoping review , author=. NPJ digital medicine , volume=. 2024 , publisher=

    2024

  91. [99]

    JMIR mHealth and uHealth , volume=

    Ethical development of digital phenotyping tools for mental health applications: Delphi study , author=. JMIR mHealth and uHealth , volume=. 2021 , publisher=

    2021

  92. [100]

    Extended Abstracts of the 2019 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems , pages=

    Social media as a passive sensor in longitudinal studies of human behavior and wellbeing , author=. Extended Abstracts of the 2019 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems , pages=

    2019

  93. [101]

    , author=

    Machine Learning Approaches for Depression Detection on Social Media: A Systematic Review of Biases and Methodological Challenges. , author=. Journal of Behavioral Data Science , volume=

  94. [102]

    Proceedings of the ACM on Human-Computer Interaction , volume=

    Towards Human-Centered Early Prediction Models for Academic Performance in Real-World Contexts , author=. Proceedings of the ACM on Human-Computer Interaction , volume=. 2025 , publisher=

    2025

  95. [103]

    Proceedings of the 2020 conference on fairness, accountability, and transparency , pages=

    Algorithmic realism: expanding the boundaries of algorithmic thought , author=. Proceedings of the 2020 conference on fairness, accountability, and transparency , pages=

    2020

  96. [104]

    Proceedings of the 2023 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems , pages=

    Is this AI trained on credible data? The effects of labeling quality and performance bias on user trust , author=. Proceedings of the 2023 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems , pages=

    2023

  97. [105]

    Proceedings of the 2023 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems , pages=

    A hunt for the snark: Annotator diversity in data practices , author=. Proceedings of the 2023 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems , pages=

    2023

  98. [106]

    Proceedings of the 2021 ACM conference on fairness, accountability, and transparency , pages=

    Towards accountability for machine learning datasets: Practices from software engineering and infrastructure , author=. Proceedings of the 2021 ACM conference on fairness, accountability, and transparency , pages=

    2021

  99. [107]

    Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences , volume=

    Reimagining the machine learning life cycle to improve educational outcomes of students , author=. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences , volume=. 2023 , publisher=

    2023

  100. [108]

    Computational Statistics and Mathematical Modeling Methods in Intelligent Systems: Proceedings of 3rd Computational Methods in Systems and Software 2019, Vol

    The comparison of machine-learning methods XGBoost and LightGBM to predict energy development , author=. Computational Statistics and Mathematical Modeling Methods in Intelligent Systems: Proceedings of 3rd Computational Methods in Systems and Software 2019, Vol. 2 3 , pages=....

    2019

  101. [109]

    Biometrics , pages=

    Random-effects models for longitudinal data , author=. Biometrics , pages=. 1982 , publisher=

    1982

  102. [110]

    IEEE signal processing magazine , volume=

    Mean squared error: Love it or leave it? A new look at signal fidelity measures , author=. IEEE signal processing magazine , volume=. 2009 , publisher=

    2009

  103. [111]

    Proceedings of the ACM on Interactive, Mobile, Wearable and Ubiquitous Technologies , volume=

    GLOBEM: Cross-Dataset Generalization of Longitudinal Human Behavior Modeling , author=. Proceedings of the ACM on Interactive, Mobile, Wearable and Ubiquitous Technologies , volume=. 2023 , publisher=

    2023

  104. [112]

    Proceedings of the ACM on Interactive, Mobile, Wearable and Ubiquitous Technologies , volume=

    n-gage: Predicting in-class emotional, behavioural and cognitive engagement in the wild , author=. Proceedings of the ACM on Interactive, Mobile, Wearable and Ubiquitous Technologies , volume=. 2020 , publisher=

    2020

  105. [113]

    Scientific Data , volume=

    Understanding occupants’ behaviour, engagement, emotion, and comfort indoors with heterogeneous sensors and wearables , author=. Scientific Data , volume=. 2022 , publisher=

    2022

  106. [114]

    Journal of clinical epidemiology , volume=

    False discovery rate control is a recommended alternative to Bonferroni-type adjustments in health studies , author=. Journal of clinical epidemiology , volume=. 2014 , publisher=

    2014

  107. [115]

    Genetics , volume=

    Quantitative trait loci analysis using the false discovery rate , author=. Genetics , volume=. 2005 , publisher=

    2005

  108. [116]

    Journal of the Royal statistical society: series B (Methodological) , volume=

    Controlling the false discovery rate: a practical and powerful approach to multiple testing , author=. Journal of the Royal statistical society: series B (Methodological) , volume=. 1995 , publisher=

    1995

  109. [117]

    The annals of mathematical statistics , pages=

    On a test of whether one of two random variables is stochastically larger than the other , author=. The annals of mathematical statistics , pages=. 1947 , publisher=

    1947

  110. [118]

    1992 , publisher=

    Individual comparisons by ranking methods , author=. 1992 , publisher=

    1992

  111. [119]

    Journal of the American Association of Nurse Practitioners , volume=

    Health and academic success: A look at the challenges of first-generation community college students , author=. Journal of the American Association of Nurse Practitioners , volume=. 2016 , publisher=

    2016

  112. [120]

    ACM Transactions on Accessible Computing , volume=

    Impact of Online Learning in the Context of COVID-19 on Undergraduates with Disabilities and Mental Health Concerns , author=. ACM Transactions on Accessible Computing , volume=. 2022 , publisher=

    2022

  113. [121]

    Journal of psychiatry & neuroscience: JPN , volume=

    Why is depression more prevalent in women? , author=. Journal of psychiatry & neuroscience: JPN , volume=. 2015 , publisher=

    2015

  114. [122]

    Current opinion in Psychiatry , volume=

    Postpartum depression among immigrant women , author=. Current opinion in Psychiatry , volume=. 2010 , publisher=

    2010

  115. [123]

    Journal of College Counseling , volume=

    First-generation undergraduate students' social support, depression, and life satisfaction , author=. Journal of College Counseling , volume=. 2013 , publisher=

    2013

  116. [124]

    2022 ACM Conference on Fairness, Accountability, and Transparency , pages=

    Towards fair unsupervised learning , author=. 2022 ACM Conference on Fairness, Accountability, and Transparency , pages=

    2022

  117. [125]

    Proceedings of the ACM on Interactive, Mobile, Wearable and Ubiquitous Technologies , volume=

    Leveraging collaborative-filtering for personalized behavior modeling: a case study of depression detection among college students , author=. Proceedings of the ACM on Interactive, Mobile, Wearable and Ubiquitous Technologies , volume=. 2021 , publisher=

    2021

  118. [126]

    Proceedings of the ACM on Interactive, Mobile, Wearable and Ubiquitous Technologies , volume=

    Joint modeling of heterogeneous sensing data for depression assessment via multi-task learning , author=. Proceedings of the ACM on Interactive, Mobile, Wearable and Ubiquitous Technologies , volume=. 2018 , publisher=

    2018

  119. [127]

    Proceedings of the ACM on Interactive, Mobile, Wearable and Ubiquitous Technologies , volume=

    Leveraging routine behavior and contextually-filtered features for depression detection among college students , author=. Proceedings of the ACM on Interactive, Mobile, Wearable and Ubiquitous Technologies , volume=. 2019 , publisher=

    2019

  120. [128]

    Proceedings of the ACM on Interactive, Mobile, Wearable and Ubiquitous Technologies , volume=

    Tracking depression dynamics in college students using mobile phone and wearable sensing , author=. Proceedings of the ACM on Interactive, Mobile, Wearable and Ubiquitous Technologies , volume=. 2018 , publisher=

    2018

  121. [129]

    Journal of medical Internet research , volume=

    Mobile phone sensor correlates of depressive symptom severity in daily-life behavior: an exploratory study , author=. Journal of medical Internet research , volume=. 2015 , publisher=

    2015

  122. [130]

    JMIR mHealth and uHealth , volume=

    Mobile sensing and support for people with depression: a pilot trial in the wild , author=. JMIR mHealth and uHealth , volume=. 2016 , publisher=

    2016

  123. [131]

    introspection: refining prediction of clinical depression via smartphone sensing data , author=

    Behavior vs. introspection: refining prediction of clinical depression via smartphone sensing data , author=. 2016 IEEE wireless health (WH) , pages=. 2016 , organization=

    2016

  124. [132]

    Proceedings of the ACM on Human-Computer Interaction , volume=

    A Systematic Literature Review on Equity and Technology in HCI and Fairness: Navigating the Complexities and Nuances of Equity Research , author=. Proceedings of the ACM on Human-Computer Interaction , volume=. 2025 , publisher=

    2025

  125. [133]

    Proceedings of the 2015 ACM international joint conference on pervasive and ubiquitous computing , pages=

    Trajectories of depression: unobtrusive monitoring of depressive states by means of smartphone mobility traces analysis , author=. Proceedings of the 2015 ACM international joint conference on pervasive and ubiquitous computing , pages=

    2015

  126. [134]

    Proceedings of the 2022 ACM Conference on Fairness, Accountability, and Transparency , pages=

    Female, white, 27? bias evaluation on data and algorithms for affect recognition in faces , author=. Proceedings of the 2022 ACM Conference on Fairness, Accountability, and Transparency , pages=

    2022

  127. [135]

    Proceedings of the 2024 ACM Conference on Fairness, Accountability, and Transparency , pages=

    Auditing work: exploring the New York City algorithmic bias audit regime , author=. Proceedings of the 2024 ACM Conference on Fairness, Accountability, and Transparency , pages=

    2024

  128. [136]

    Proceedings of the 2025 ACM Conference on Fairness, Accountability, and Transparency , pages=

    Auditing Political Exposure Bias: Algorithmic Amplification on Twitter/X During the 2024 US Presidential Election , author=. Proceedings of the 2025 ACM Conference on Fairness, Accountability, and Transparency , pages=

    2024

  129. [137]

    Journal of personality assessment , volume=

    Comparison of Beck Depression Inventories-IA and-II in psychiatric outpatients , author=. Journal of personality assessment , volume=. 1996 , publisher=

    1996

  130. [138]

    Advances in neural information processing systems , volume=

    GLOBEM dataset: multi-year datasets for longitudinal human behavior modeling generalization , author=. Advances in neural information processing systems , volume=

  131. [139]

    Digital Society , volume=

    Examining Ethical and Social Implications of Digital Mental Health Technologies Through Expert Interviews and Sociotechnical Systems Theory , author=. Digital Society , volume=. 2024 , publisher=

    2024

  132. [140]

    Proceedings of the 2022 ACM Conference on Fairness, Accountability, and Transparency , pages=

    Towards a multi-stakeholder value-based assessment framework for algorithmic systems , author=. Proceedings of the 2022 ACM Conference on Fairness, Accountability, and Transparency , pages=

    2022

  133. [141]

    Journal of neuroengineering and rehabilitation , volume=

    It’s not about the capture, it’s about what we can learn”: a qualitative study of experts’ opinions and experiences regarding the use of wearable sensors to measure gait and physical activity , author=. Journal of neuroengineering and rehabilitation , volume=. 2021 , publisher=

    2021

  134. [142]

    Proceedings of the 2023 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems , pages=

    Algorithmic power or punishment: Information worker perspectives on passive sensing enabled ai phenotyping of performance and wellbeing , author=. Proceedings of the 2023 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems , pages=

    2023

  135. [143]

    Proceedings of the ACM on Human-Computer Interaction , volume=

    Sensing wellbeing in the workplace, why and for whom? envisioning impacts with organizational stakeholders , author=. Proceedings of the ACM on Human-Computer Interaction , volume=. 2023 , publisher=

    2023

  136. [144]

    2023 , publisher=

    Fairness and machine learning: Limitations and opportunities , author=. 2023 , publisher=

    2023

  137. [145]

    Proceedings of the ACM on Interactive, Mobile, Wearable and Ubiquitous Technologies , volume=

    Uncovering bias in personal informatics , author=. Proceedings of the ACM on Interactive, Mobile, Wearable and Ubiquitous Technologies , volume=. 2023 , publisher=

    2023

  138. [146]

    Proceedings of the 2023 CHI conference on human factors in computing systems , pages=

    Complex daily activities, country-level diversity, and smartphone sensing: A study in denmark, italy, mongolia, paraguay, and uk , author=. Proceedings of the 2023 CHI conference on human factors in computing systems , pages=

    2023

  139. [147]

    modeling personalidad: In-the-wild mobile data analysis in five countries suggests cultural impact on personality models , author=

    Modeling personality vs. modeling personalidad: In-the-wild mobile data analysis in five countries suggests cultural impact on personality models , author=. Proceedings of the ACM on Interactive, Mobile, Wearable and Ubiquitous Technologies , volume=. 2019 , publisher=

    2019

  140. [148]

    Cureus , volume=

    Drug-induced hyperthermia review , author=. Cureus , volume=. 2022 , publisher=

    2022

  141. [149]

    EClinicalMedicine , volume=

    The effect of prescription and over-the-counter medications on core temperature in adults during heat stress: a systematic review and meta-analysis , author=. EClinicalMedicine , volume=. 2024 , publisher=

    2024

  142. [150]

    Autonomic Neuroscience , volume=

    Thermoregulatory disorders and illness related to heat and cold stress , author=. Autonomic Neuroscience , volume=. 2016 , publisher=

    2016

  143. [151]

    New England Journal of Medicine , volume=

    Machine learning in medicine , author=. New England Journal of Medicine , volume=. 2019 , publisher=

    2019

  144. [152]

    International conference on machine learning , pages=

    On calibration of modern neural networks , author=. International conference on machine learning , pages=. 2017 , organization=

    2017

  145. [153]

    Machine learning for healthcare conference , pages=

    What clinicians want: contextualizing explainable machine learning for clinical end use , author=. Machine learning for healthcare conference , pages=. 2019 , organization=

    2019

  146. [154]

    ACM Transactions on Computer-Human Interaction (TOCHI) , volume=

    Detecting depression and predicting its onset using longitudinal symptoms captured by passive sensing: a machine learning approach with robust feature selection , author=. ACM Transactions on Computer-Human Interaction (TOCHI) , volume=. 2021 , publisher=

    2021

  147. [155]

    Current Psychology , volume=

    The influence of classroom seating arrangement on children’s cognitive processes in primary school: the role of individual variables , author=. Current Psychology , volume=. 2022 , publisher=

    2022

  148. [156]

    Support for learning , volume=

    Seating arrangements that promote positive academic and behavioural outcomes: A review of empirical research , author=. Support for learning , volume=. 2008 , publisher=

    2008

  149. [157]

    Building acoustics , volume=

    The effects of noise on children at school: A review , author=. Building acoustics , volume=. 2003 , publisher=

    2003

  150. [158]

    Indoor air , volume=

    Association between substandard classroom ventilation rates and students’ academic achievement , author=. Indoor air , volume=. 2011 , publisher=

    2011

  151. [159]

    Hvac&R Research , volume=

    The effects of moderately raised classroom temperatures and classroom ventilation rate on the performance of schoolwork by children (RP-1257) , author=. Hvac&R Research , volume=. 2007 , publisher=

    2007

  152. [160]

    Proceedings of the ACM on Human-Computer Interaction , volume=

    How computers see gender: An evaluation of gender classification in commercial facial analysis services , author=. Proceedings of the ACM on Human-Computer Interaction , volume=. 2019 , publisher=

    2019

  153. [161]

    Proceedings of the 2021 ACM conference on fairness, accountability, and transparency , pages=

    Measurement and fairness , author=. Proceedings of the 2021 ACM conference on fairness, accountability, and transparency , pages=

    2021

  154. [162]

    Proceedings of the AAAI conference on artificial intelligence , volume=

    Fair inference on outcomes , author=. Proceedings of the AAAI conference on artificial intelligence , volume=

  155. [163]

    Early engagement and new technologies: Opening up the laboratory , pages=

    Value sensitive design and information systems , author=. Early engagement and new technologies: Opening up the laboratory , pages=. 2013 , publisher=

    2013

  156. [164]

    ACM Transactions on information systems (TOIS) , volume=

    Bias in computer systems , author=. ACM Transactions on information systems (TOIS) , volume=. 1996 , publisher=

    1996

  157. [165]

    Proceedings of the 2021 AAAI/ACM Conference on AI, Ethics, and Society , pages=

    What's fair about individual fairness? , author=. Proceedings of the 2021 AAAI/ACM Conference on AI, Ethics, and Society , pages=

    2021

  158. [166]

    Proceedings of the AAAI conference on artificial intelligence , volume=

    Path-specific counterfactual fairness , author=. Proceedings of the AAAI conference on artificial intelligence , volume=

  159. [167]

    Advances in neural information processing systems , volume=

    Counterfactual fairness , author=. Advances in neural information processing systems , volume=

  160. [168]

    Proceedings of the 3rd innovations in theoretical computer science conference , pages=

    Fairness through awareness , author=. Proceedings of the 3rd innovations in theoretical computer science conference , pages=

  161. [169]

    Advances in neural information processing systems , volume=

    On fairness and calibration , author=. Advances in neural information processing systems , volume=

  162. [170]

    Big data , volume=

    Fair prediction with disparate impact: A study of bias in recidivism prediction instruments , author=. Big data , volume=. 2017 , publisher=

    2017

  163. [171]

    Advances in neural information processing systems , volume=

    Equality of opportunity in supervised learning , author=. Advances in neural information processing systems , volume=

  164. [172]

    Communications of the ACM , volume=

    The (im) possibility of fairness: Different value systems require different mechanisms for fair decision making , author=. Communications of the ACM , volume=. 2021 , publisher=

    2021

  165. [173]

    The philosophical review , volume=

    Justice as fairness , author=. The philosophical review , volume=. 1958 , publisher=

    1958

  166. [174]

    Proceedings of the ACM on interactive, mobile, wearable and ubiquitous technologies , volume=

    Generalization and personalization of mobile sensing-based mood inference models: an analysis of college students in eight countries , author=. Proceedings of the ACM on interactive, mobile, wearable and ubiquitous technologies , volume=. 2023 , publisher=

    2023

  167. [175]

    npj Mental Health Research , volume=

    Measuring algorithmic bias to analyze the reliability of AI tools that predict depression risk using smartphone sensed-behavioral data , author=. npj Mental Health Research , volume=. 2024 , publisher=

    2024

  168. [176]

    arXiv preprint arXiv:2303.15585 , year=

    Beyond accuracy: a critical review of fairness in machine learning for mobile and wearable computing , author=. arXiv preprint arXiv:2303.15585 , year=

  169. [177]

    Proceedings of the ACM on Human-Computer Interaction , volume=

    Where responsible AI meets reality: Practitioner perspectives on enablers for shifting organizational practices , author=. Proceedings of the ACM on Human-Computer Interaction , volume=. 2021 , publisher=

    2021

  170. [178]

    Proceedings of the 2021 ACM conference on fairness, accountability, and transparency , pages=

    Algorithmic impact assessments and accountability: The co-construction of impacts , author=. Proceedings of the 2021 ACM conference on fairness, accountability, and transparency , pages=

    2021

  171. [179]

    Proceedings of the 2020 CHI conference on human factors in computing systems , pages=

    Questioning the AI: informing design practices for explainable AI user experiences , author=. Proceedings of the 2020 CHI conference on human factors in computing systems , pages=

    2020

  172. [180]

    Proceedings of the 2020 conference on fairness, accountability, and transparency , pages=

    Towards a critical race methodology in algorithmic fairness , author=. Proceedings of the 2020 conference on fairness, accountability, and transparency , pages=

    2020

  173. [181]

    Proceedings of the 2022 ACM conference on fairness, accountability, and transparency , pages=

    The values encoded in machine learning research , author=. Proceedings of the 2022 ACM conference on fairness, accountability, and transparency , pages=

    2022

  174. [182]

    Conference on fairness, accountability and transparency , pages=

    Fairness in machine learning: Lessons from political philosophy , author=. Conference on fairness, accountability and transparency , pages=. 2018 , organization=

    2018

  175. [183]

    Proceedings of the 2020 conference on fairness, accountability, and transparency , pages=

    Toward situated interventions for algorithmic equity: lessons from the field , author=. Proceedings of the 2020 conference on fairness, accountability, and transparency , pages=

    2020

  176. [184]

    Communications of the ACM , volume=

    Datasheets for datasets , author=. Communications of the ACM , volume=. 2021 , publisher=

    2021

  177. [185]

    Proceedings of the conference on fairness, accountability, and transparency , pages=

    A taxonomy of ethical tensions in inferring mental health states from social media , author=. Proceedings of the conference on fairness, accountability, and transparency , pages=

  178. [186]

    Proceedings of the 2020 conference on fairness, accountability, and transparency , pages=

    Closing the AI accountability gap: Defining an end-to-end framework for internal algorithmic auditing , author=. Proceedings of the 2020 conference on fairness, accountability, and transparency , pages=

    2020

  179. [187]

    Proceedings of the 2019 AAAI/ACM Conference on AI, Ethics, and Society , pages=

    Actionable auditing: Investigating the impact of publicly naming biased performance results of commercial ai products , author=. Proceedings of the 2019 AAAI/ACM Conference on AI, Ethics, and Society , pages=

    2019

  180. [188]

    Conference on fairness, accountability and transparency , pages=

    Gender shades: Intersectional accuracy disparities in commercial gender classification , author=. Conference on fairness, accountability and transparency , pages=. 2018 , organization=

    2018

  181. [189]

    ACM computing surveys (CSUR) , volume=

    A survey on bias and fairness in machine learning , author=. ACM computing surveys (CSUR) , volume=. 2021 , publisher=

    2021

  182. [190]

    Translation tutorial: 21 fairness definitions and their politics , author=. Proc. conf. fairness accountability transp., new york, usa , volume=

  183. [191]

    Public law , volume=

    Health insurance portability and accountability act of 1996 , author=. Public law , volume=

    1996

  184. [192]

    Neuropsychopharmacology , volume=

    Opportunities and challenges in the collection and analysis of digital phenotyping data , author=. Neuropsychopharmacology , volume=. 2021 , publisher=

    2021

  185. [193]

    Jama , volume=

    Digital phenotyping: technology for a new science of behavior , author=. Jama , volume=. 2017 , publisher=

    2017

  186. [194]

    Proceedings of the 2015

    Wang, Rui and Harari, Gabriella and Hao, Peilin and Zhou, Xia and Campbell, Andrew T , year =. Proceedings of the 2015

    2015

Pith tools

Reviewed August 1, 2026 · model on record in the stance chip above.