Pith. sign in

REVIEW

Male Under-performance in Undergraduate Engineering Mathematical Courses: Causes and Solution Strategy

Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.

This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.

SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event

T0 review · schema-true

One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.

pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp

arxiv 1907.00552 v5 pith:VXZ4QBBU submitted 2019-07-01 math.HO stat.AP

classification math.HOstat.AP
keywords coursesengineeringacrossidentifyimmediatemathematicalperformancesignificant
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal

Signed reviews

No signed human review yet.

0 comments
read the original abstract

There has been an increasing trend of females performing better than males academically across the mathematical engineering courses. To confirm this assumption, final marks of two independent samples of students from Calculus courses across all fields within Engineering at a local university of UAE are considered. A two-sample t-test indicates a significant difference in the performance between the two genders. Accordingly, a survey was designed to identify factors that may yield to this scenario. Analysis of the survey found that the time spend studying outside the classroom is a statistically significant factor contributing to the disparity between the gender performances. Based on these results, we propose immediate short-term solutions that can be applied by instructors to address this issue. This study advocates the need of continuous research at micro level to identify gender-based student performance variance. Such researches can assist in immediate intervention thereby leading to the bridging of such a gap.

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Pith tools