Pith. sign in

REVIEW 4 major objections 1 minor 48 references

EGS-SLAM: RGB-D Gaussian Splatting SLAM with Events

T0 review · 4 major / 1 minor · reviewed 2026-08-05 · deepseek-v4-flash

Pith's one-line read Event cameras fix motion blur for Gaussian-Splatting SLAM

desk verdict The full text we were sent is not EGS-SLAM; it's a pinching-antenna symbiotic radio paper, so the abstract is the only evidence available—and it reads as a plausible, well-scoped contribution that no one can actually verify. read the letter →

arxiv 2508.07003 v1 pith:W3SMYTDH submitted 2025-08-09 cs.RO

classification cs.RO
keywords GaussianSplattingSLAMeventcameramotionblurRGB-Dresponsefunctioncontinuoustrajectoryphotorealistic3Dreconstructionsimultaneouslocalizationandmapping
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal

The pith

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The reading

EGS-SLAM claims that fusing event-camera data with RGB-D images lets a Gaussian Splatting SLAM system keep tracking accurate and 3D reconstruction photorealistic even under persistent, severe motion blur — conditions where existing GS-SLAM systems degrade badly. The paper argues that motion blur is not merely a nuisance to be removed in post-processing, but a source of information: by explicitly modeling the camera's continuous trajectory during the exposure interval, the system can use the blur itself to constrain both tracking and mapping on a unified 3D Gaussian scene. It further introduces a learnable camera response function to align the dynamic ranges of event and image measurements, and a no-event loss to suppress ringing artifacts in the reconstruction. If this works, event-augmented GS-SLAM becomes a practical option for fast, blurry real-world motion, where ordinary RGB-D SLAM tends to fail.

What carries the argument

The central mechanism is the explicit continuous-trajectory exposure model: instead of assuming a single camera pose per frame, EGS-SLAM parameterizes the camera's pose as a continuous function of time over the exposure interval, so that motion-blurred image pixels and event measurements are both rendered through the same 3D Gaussian scene and optimized jointly. Supporting this are a learnable camera response function (CRF) that maps scene radiance to the image and event domains, and a no-event loss that suppresses ringing artifacts by discouraging reconstruction of ghost geometry in event-free regions.

What would settle it

Run EGS-SLAM on a sequence where blur is caused by independent scene motion (objects moving relative to a static or slowly moving camera) and check whether trajectory accuracy and reconstruction quality collapse; if they do, the load-bearing exposure-motion model is confirmed to be the source of the claimed robustness.

Watch

Extended reading notes

Core claim

EGS-SLAM is a GS-SLAM framework that jointly uses event streams and RGB-D frames to handle motion blur by modeling the camera pose as a continuous trajectory during each exposure period. Rather than treating blurred frames as corrupted inputs, it integrates the blur model into both the tracking and mapping optimization, allowing the 3D Gaussian scene to explain the blurred observations. A learnable camera response function aligns the radiometric responses of events and images, and a no-event loss penalizes spurious Gaussians that would otherwise create ringing artifacts. On a new dataset of synthetic and real blurred sequences, the paper reports that EGS-SLAM consistently outperforms existin

Load-bearing premise

The method assumes that all motion blur in the RGB-D frames comes from the camera's own continuous motion during the exposure interval, and that this trajectory can be recovered well enough from the fused event and RGB-D streams to deblur, track, and reconstruct accurately.

Editorial extensions

If this is right

  • GS-SLAM systems can remain accurate and photorealistic under severe motion blur if the blur is explicitly modeled as continuous camera motion during exposure.
  • Event streams, though sparse and discrete, can be effectively compensated by the dense RGB-D prior, making the fusion mutually beneficial.
  • The learnable CRF provides a principled way to align the dynamic ranges of event and image sensors, removing a recurring source of mismatch in event-RGB fusion.
  • A new benchmark with synthetic and real blurred sequences enables direct comparison of future event-aware GS-SLAM methods.
  • The approach suggests that blur, instead of being discarded, can act as an additional constraint that stabilizes tracking and mapping in high-motion scenarios.

Reading between the lines

Editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • The continuous-trajectory model could be extended to rolling-shutter effects by allowing the pose curve to vary along image rows, an adaptation the paper does not explicitly explore.
  • Because the CRF is learned per dataset, the method may be sensitive to sensor-specific radiometric calibration; a testable extension is to evaluate with unseen camera models to check generalization.
  • The no-event loss hints that event-free regions carry strong negative evidence; this principle could improve other event-based reconstruction pipelines by penalizing spurious Gaussians outside the event field of view.
  • If the blur model holds, the same framework could support deblurring as a by-product, producing sharp virtual frames from the estimated trajectory and scene — a practical output the paper does not highlight.
Share X Bluesky LinkedIn Reddit HN

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, and a circularity audit.

Referee Report

4 major / 1 minor

Summary. The manuscript purports to present EGS-SLAM, an RGB-D Gaussian Splatting SLAM system that fuses event data with RGB-D inputs to handle severe motion blur. The abstract claims that the system explicitly models the camera's continuous trajectory during exposure, supports event- and blur-aware tracking and mapping on a unified 3D Gaussian Splatting scene, introduces a learnable camera response function, and uses a no-event loss to suppress ringing. It further claims consistent improvements over existing GS-SLAM systems in trajectory accuracy and photorealistic reconstruction, validated on a new synthetic and real dataset. However, the full text supplied for review is the manuscript of arXiv:2508.07002, 'Joint Transmit and Pinching Beamforming Optimization in Pinching Antenna-Assisted Symbiotic Radio Systems', which is a wireless-communications paper unrelated to SLAM, events, or Gaussian Splatting. Consequently, the only EGS-SLAM content available is the abstract; none of the method's equations, algorithms, experiments, tables, or evaluation protocols appear in the received text.

Significance. If the claimed system were fully described and validated, the contribution would be significant for the GS-SLAM community: motion blur is a known failure mode of RGB-D SLAM, and fusing event data with explicit continuous-exposure trajectory modeling is a plausible and timely remedy. The paper also promises open-source code, which would aid reproducibility. However, these potential strengths cannot be assessed from the supplied text. The abstract contains no quantitative results, no experimental protocol, no baselines, no ablations, and no equations. The verification blocker is total: as received, the manuscript does not contain the claimed paper.

major comments (4)
  1. [Full text (all sections)] The supplied full text is arXiv:2508.07002, a pinching-antenna symbiotic radio paper, not EGS-SLAM. None of the mechanisms named in the abstract—continuous camera trajectory during exposure, event-aware tracking/mapping on a unified 3D Gaussian Splatting scene, learnable camera response function, no-event loss—appear anywhere in the text. There is no derivation of the blur formation model, no event integration formulation, and no description of the joint optimization. The central claim of the paper is therefore without any supporting technical content in the received manuscript.
  2. [Abstract] The abstract's assertion that 'EGS-SLAM consistently outperforms existing GS-SLAM systems in both trajectory accuracy and photorealistic 3D Gaussian Splatting reconstruction' is unbacked by data. No tables, figures, or metrics (e.g., ATE, RPE, PSNR/SSIM/LPIPS) are provided, and there is no description of the comparison baselines, dataset construction, or evaluation protocol. A qualitative claim of this strength cannot be assessed from the abstract alone.
  3. [Abstract, 'continuous trajectory during exposure'] The load-bearing modeling assumption—that motion blur is caused by the camera's continuous motion during exposure and that this trajectory can be estimated from fused RGB-D plus event streams—is never formalized. Without the blur formation model, the trajectory parameterization, and the objective functions, there is no way to evaluate identifiability or the risks posed by rolling-shutter effects, scene motion, or residual radiometric mismatch. This is not a technical refutation of the idea; it is a statement that the received text provides no basis for checking it.
  4. [Abstract, 'learnable camera response function'] The learnable camera response function is a free parameter set whose parameterization, constraints, initialization, and regularization are unspecified. Because a learnable CRF can in principle absorb systematic errors between event and image radiometry, its design and ablation are critical to the claimed robustness. The supplied text contains no details that would allow this component to be evaluated.
minor comments (1)
  1. [Abstract] The abstract promises that source code will be available at a GitHub URL, but no code, dataset access, or repository snapshot is part of the submitted manuscript. As presented, the reproducibility artifacts are only a promise.

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged · score 0.0 of 10

No circularity identifiable: the supplied full text is an unrelated pinching-antenna paper (arXiv:2508.07002), so EGS-SLAM's derivation chain is absent and no reduction of claims to inputs can be exhibited.

full rationale

The stated target manuscript is arXiv:2508.07003 (EGS-SLAM), but the full text supplied is arXiv:2508.07002, a paper on joint transmit and pinching beamforming in symbiotic radio systems. None of EGS-SLAM's equations, fitting procedures, learnable CRF definition, continuous-exposure trajectory model, no-event loss, dataset description, or experimental comparisons are present in the provided text. The abstract alone makes ambitious claims, but the circularity pass requires quoting the paper's own derivation chain and exhibiting a specific reduction, e.g., an equation that is identical to its input by construction or a fitted parameter renamed as a prediction. No such reduction can be identified because the relevant manuscript content is missing. The mismatch is a verification blocker, not evidence of circular reasoning. Per the hard rules, absence of evidence and speculation about possible circularity cannot raise the score. Therefore the honest finding is no significant circularity, score 0.

Assumptions & free parameters 1 free parameters · 4 assumptions · 0 invented entities

Based on the abstract alone, the only explicitly fitted component is the learnable CRF. The trajectory model and the event-image fusion rely on domain assumptions about sensor synchronization, blur generation, and the validity of the underlying GS-SLAM framework. No new physical entities, particles, forces, or conserved quantities are introduced.

free parameters (1)
  • Learnable camera response function (CRF) parameters = unspecified (learned from data)
    The abstract states 'we introduce a learnable camera response function to align the dynamic ranges of events and images.' These parameters are fitted during optimization and are needed for the event-image alignment; no principled closed-form derivation is given in the abstract.
assumptions (4)
  • domain assumption Event data and RGB-D frames can be accurately time-synchronized and co-calibrated in a unified 3D Gaussian Splatting scene.
    The abstract says EGS-SLAM 'fuses event data with RGB-D inputs' on 'a unified 3D Gaussian Splatting scene'; no synchronization or calibration procedure is described in the abstract.
  • domain assumption Motion blur in the RGB-D images is caused by the camera's continuous motion during exposure and can be modeled by a continuous trajectory.
    The abstract says 'we explicitly model the camera's continuous trajectory during exposure' as the basis for blur-aware tracking and mapping; rolling shutter, scene motion, and other blur sources are not discussed in the abstract.
  • domain assumption A learnable CRF can align the dynamic ranges of events and images well enough for joint optimization.
    The abstract introduces 'a learnable camera response function to align the dynamic ranges of events and images'; its adequacy is not demonstrated in the abstract.
  • domain assumption Gaussian Splatting SLAM machinery carries over as valid prior technology when events are added.
    The abstract builds 'on a unified 3D Gaussian Splatting scene' and compares with 'existing GS-SLAM systems', meaning the 3D Gaussian Splatting representation and its optimization machinery are assumed from prior work.

how reviews work

0 comments
Cite this review

Pith. "Pith review of EGS-SLAM: RGB-D Gaussian Splatting SLAM with Events." pith.science (2026). https://pith.science/paper/W3SMYTDH

@misc{pith2026250807003,
  author       = {Pith},
  title        = {Pith review of: EGS-SLAM: RGB-D Gaussian Splatting SLAM with Events},
  year         = {2026},
  howpublished = {\url{https://pith.science/paper/W3SMYTDH}},
  note         = {Machine review of arXiv:2508.07003}
}
read the original abstract

Gaussian Splatting SLAM (GS-SLAM) offers a notable improvement over traditional SLAM methods, enabling photorealistic 3D reconstruction that conventional approaches often struggle to achieve. However, existing GS-SLAM systems perform poorly under persistent and severe motion blur commonly encountered in real-world scenarios, leading to significantly degraded tracking accuracy and compromised 3D reconstruction quality. To address this limitation, we propose EGS-SLAM, a novel GS-SLAM framework that fuses event data with RGB-D inputs to simultaneously reduce motion blur in images and compensate for the sparse and discrete nature of event streams, enabling robust tracking and high-fidelity 3D Gaussian Splatting reconstruction. Specifically, our system explicitly models the camera's continuous trajectory during exposure, supporting event- and blur-aware tracking and mapping on a unified 3D Gaussian Splatting scene. Furthermore, we introduce a learnable camera response function to align the dynamic ranges of events and images, along with a no-event loss to suppress ringing artifacts during reconstruction. We validate our approach on a new dataset comprising synthetic and real-world sequences with significant motion blur. Extensive experimental results demonstrate that EGS-SLAM consistently outperforms existing GS-SLAM systems in both trajectory accuracy and photorealistic 3D Gaussian Splatting reconstruction. The source code will be available at https://github.com/Chensiyu00/EGS-SLAM.

Discussion (0). Sign in to comment.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

48 extracted references · 36 canonical work pages

  1. [1]

    6g internet of things: A comprehensive survey,

    D. C. Nguyen, M. Ding, P. N. Pathirana, A. Seneviratne, J. Li, D. Niyato, O. Dobre, and H. V . Poor, “6g internet of things: A comprehensive survey,”IEEE Internet of Things Journal, vol. 9, no. 1, pp. 359–383, 2022

  2. [2]

    To- ward 6g networks: Use cases and technologies,

    M. Giordani, M. Polese, M. Mezzavilla, S. Rangan, and M. Zorzi, “To- ward 6g networks: Use cases and technologies,”IEEE Communications Magazine, vol. 58, no. 3, pp. 55–61, 2020

  3. [3]

    Hardware impaired ambient backscatter noma systems: Reli- ability and security,

    X. Li, M. Zhao, M. Zeng, S. Mumtaz, V . G. Menon, Z. Ding, and O. A. Dobre, “Hardware impaired ambient backscatter noma systems: Reli- ability and security,”IEEE Transactions on Communications, vol. 69, no. 4, pp. 2723–2736, 2021

  4. [4]

    Symbiotic radio: A new communication paradigm for passive internet of things,

    R. Long, Y .-C. Liang, H. Guo, G. Yang, and R. Zhang, “Symbiotic radio: A new communication paradigm for passive internet of things,”IEEE Internet of Things Journal, vol. 7, no. 2, pp. 1350–1363, 2020

  5. [5]

    Symbiotic radio: Cognitive backscattering communications for future wireless networks,

    Y .-C. Liang, Q. Zhang, E. G. Larsson, and G. Y . Li, “Symbiotic radio: Cognitive backscattering communications for future wireless networks,” IEEE Transactions on Cognitive Communications and Networking, vol. 6, no. 4, pp. 1242–1255, 2020

  6. [6]

    Physical-layer authentication for ambient backscatter- aided noma symbiotic systems,

    X. Li, Q. Wang, M. Zeng, Y . Liu, S. Dang, T. A. Tsiftsis, and O. A. Dobre, “Physical-layer authentication for ambient backscatter- aided noma symbiotic systems,”IEEE Transactions on Communications, vol. 71, no. 4, pp. 2288–2303, 2023

  7. [7]

    A novel wireless communication paradigm for intelligent reflecting surface based symbiotic radio systems,

    M. Hua, Q. Wu, L. Yang, R. Schober, and H. V . Poor, “A novel wireless communication paradigm for intelligent reflecting surface based symbiotic radio systems,”IEEE Transactions on Signal Processing, vol. 70, pp. 550–565, 2022

  8. [8]

    Full-duplex backscatter communications in symbiotic radio systems,

    R. Long, H. Guo, L. Zhang, and Y .-C. Liang, “Full-duplex backscatter communications in symbiotic radio systems,”IEEE Access, vol. 7, pp. 21 597–21 608, 2019

Show all 48 references
  1. [9]

    Covert communications with enhanced physical layer security in ris-assisted cooperative networks,

    X. Li, M. Liu, S. Dang, N. C. Luong, C. Yuen, A. Nallanathan, and D. Niyato, “Covert communications with enhanced physical layer security in ris-assisted cooperative networks,”IEEE Transactions on Wireless Communications, vol. 24, no. 7, pp. 5605–5619, 2025

  2. [10]

    Backscatter communication assisted by reconfigurable intelligent sur- faces,

    Y .-C. Liang, Q. Zhang, J. Wang, R. Long, H. Zhou, and G. Yang, “Backscatter communication assisted by reconfigurable intelligent sur- faces,”Proceedings of the IEEE, vol. 110, no. 9, pp. 1339–1357, 2022

  3. [11]

    Reconfigurable intelligent surface assisted mimo symbiotic radio networks,

    Q. Zhang, Y .-C. Liang, and H. V . Poor, “Reconfigurable intelligent surface assisted mimo symbiotic radio networks,”IEEE Transactions on Communications, vol. 69, no. 7, pp. 4832–4846, 2021

  4. [12]

    Realizing spectrum and power sharing with wi-fi: A ris-assisted symbiotic radio perspective,

    H. Chen, R. Long, Y .-C. Liang, and G. Zhou, “Realizing spectrum and power sharing with wi-fi: A ris-assisted symbiotic radio perspective,” IEEE Journal on Selected Areas in Communications, pp. 1–1, 2025

  5. [13]

    Movable antennas for wireless communi- cation: Opportunities and challenges,

    L. Zhu, W. Ma, and R. Zhang, “Movable antennas for wireless communi- cation: Opportunities and challenges,”IEEE Communications Magazine, vol. 62, no. 6, pp. 114–120, 2024

  6. [14]

    Fluid antenna systems,

    K.-K. Wong, A. Shojaeifard, K.-F. Tong, and Y . Zhang, “Fluid antenna systems,”IEEE Transactions on Wireless Communications, vol. 20, no. 3, pp. 1950–1962, 2021

  7. [15]

    Movable antenna enabled symbiotic radio systems: An opportunity for mutualism,

    C. Zhou, B. Lyu, C. You, and Z. Liu, “Movable antenna enabled symbiotic radio systems: An opportunity for mutualism,”IEEE Wireless Communications Letters, vol. 13, no. 10, pp. 2752–2756, 2024

  8. [16]

    Primary rate maximiza- tion in movable antennas empowered symbiotic radio communications,

    B. Lyu, H. Liu, W. Hong, S. Gong, and F. Tian, “Primary rate maximiza- tion in movable antennas empowered symbiotic radio communications,” in2024 IEEE 99th Vehicular Technology Conference (VTC2024-Spring), 2024, pp. 1–6

  9. [17]

    Channel modeling and characteristics for 6g wireless communications,

    H. Jiang, M. Mukherjee, J. Zhou, and J. Lloret, “Channel modeling and characteristics for 6g wireless communications,”IEEE Network, vol. 35, no. 1, pp. 296–303, 2021

  10. [18]

    Intelligent reflecting surfaces: Physics, propagation, and pathloss modeling,

    O. ¨Ozdogan, E. Bj ¨ornson, and E. G. Larsson, “Intelligent reflecting surfaces: Physics, propagation, and pathloss modeling,”IEEE Wireless Communications Letters, vol. 9, no. 5, pp. 581–585, 2020

  11. [19]

    Pinching antenna: Using a dielectric waveguide as an antenna,

    H. O. Y . Suzuki and K. Kawai, “Pinching antenna: Using a dielectric waveguide as an antenna,”NTT DOCOMO Technical J, vol. 23, no. 3, pp. 5–12, 2022

  12. [20]

    Flexible-antenna systems: A pinching-antenna perspective,

    Z. Ding, R. Schober, and H. Vincent Poor, “Flexible-antenna systems: A pinching-antenna perspective,”IEEE Transactions on Communications, pp. 1–1, 2025

  13. [21]

    Resource allocation for pinching-antenna systems: State-of-the-art, key techniques and open issues,

    M. Zeng, J. Wang, O. A. Dobre, Z. Ding, G. K. Karagiannidis, R. Schober, and H. V . Poor, “Resource allocation for pinching-antenna systems: State-of-the-art, key techniques and open issues,” 2025. [Online]. Available: https://arxiv.org/abs/2506.06156

  14. [22]

    Modeling and beamforming optimization for pinching-antenna systems,

    Z. Wang, C. Ouyang, X. Mu, Y . Liu, and Z. Ding, “Modeling and beamforming optimization for pinching-antenna systems,” 2025. [Online]. Available: https://arxiv.org/abs/2502.05917 JOURNAL OF LATEX CLASS FILES, VOL. 18, NO. 9, SEPTEMBER 2024 13

  15. [23]

    Deep learning optimization of two- state pinching antennas systems,

    O. G. Karagiannidis, V . E. Galanopoulou, P. D. Diamantoulakis, Z. Ding, and O. Dobre, “Deep learning optimization of two- state pinching antennas systems,” 2025. [Online]. Available: https: //arxiv.org/abs/2507.06222

  16. [24]

    Pinching- antenna systems (pass): Architecture designs, opportunities, and outlook,

    Y . Liu, Z. Wang, X. Mu, C. Ouyang, X. Xu, and Z. Ding, “Pinching- antenna systems (pass): Architecture designs, opportunities, and outlook,” 2025. [Online]. Available: https://arxiv.org/abs/2501.18409

  17. [25]

    Joint transmit and pinching beamforming for pinching antenna systems (pass): Optimization-based or learning-based?

    X. Xu, X. Mu, Y . Liu, and A. Nallanathan, “Joint transmit and pinching beamforming for pinching antenna systems (pass): Optimization-based or learning-based?” 2025. [Online]. Available: https://arxiv.org/abs/2502.08637

  18. [26]

    Channel estimation for pinching-antenna systems (pass),

    J. Xiao, J. Wang, and Y . Liu, “Channel estimation for pinching-antenna systems (pass),”IEEE Communications Letters, pp. 1–1, 2025

  19. [27]

    Array gain for pinching- antenna systems (pass),

    C. Ouyang, Z. Wang, Y . Liu, and Z. Ding, “Array gain for pinching- antenna systems (pass),”IEEE Communications Letters, vol. 29, no. 6, pp. 1471–1475, 2025

  20. [28]

    Los blockage in pinching-antenna systems: Curse or blessing?

    Z. Ding and H. V . Poor, “Los blockage in pinching-antenna systems: Curse or blessing?”IEEE Wireless Communications Letters, pp. 1–1, 2025

  21. [29]

    Energy-efficient design for downlink pinching-antenna systems with qos guarantee,

    M. Zeng, J. Wang, G. Zhou, F. Fang, and X. Wang, “Energy-efficient design for downlink pinching-antenna systems with qos guarantee,” IEEE Transactions on Vehicular Technology, pp. 1–5, 2025

  22. [30]

    Energy- efficient resource allocation for noma-assisted uplink pinching-antenna systems,

    M. Zeng, X. Li, J. Wang, G. Huang, O. A. Dobre, and Z. Ding, “Energy- efficient resource allocation for noma-assisted uplink pinching-antenna systems,”IEEE Wireless Communications Letters, pp. 1–1, 2025

  23. [31]

    Performance analysis of pinching- antenna systems,

    D. Tyrovolas, S. A. Tegos, P. D. Diamantoulakis, S. Ioannidis, C. K. Liaskos, and G. K. Karagiannidis, “Performance analysis of pinching- antenna systems,”IEEE Transactions on Cognitive Communications and Networking, pp. 1–1, 2025

  24. [32]

    Terahertz band: The last piece of rf spectrum puzzle for communication systems,

    H. Elayan, O. Amin, B. Shihada, R. M. Shubair, and M.-S. Alouini, “Terahertz band: The last piece of rf spectrum puzzle for communication systems,”IEEE Open Journal of the Communications Society, vol. 1, pp. 1–32, 2020

  25. [33]

    Deep learning based wavenumber domain channel estimation for holographic mimo communications,

    J. Wang, X. Mei, J. Xiao, X. Li, P. Zhu, A. Nallanathan, and C. Yuen, “Deep learning based wavenumber domain channel estimation for holographic mimo communications,”IEEE Transactions on Vehicular Technology, pp. 1–6, 2025

  26. [34]

    Capacity of noncoherent time-selective rayleigh-fading channels,

    Y . Liang and V . Veeravalli, “Capacity of noncoherent time-selective rayleigh-fading channels,”IEEE Transactions on Information Theory, vol. 50, no. 12, pp. 3095–3110, 2004

  27. [35]

    Reconfigurable intelligent surface empowered symbiotic radio over broadcasting signals,

    X. Xu, Y .-C. Liang, G. Yang, and L. Zhao, “Reconfigurable intelligent surface empowered symbiotic radio over broadcasting signals,”IEEE Transactions on Communications, vol. 69, no. 10, pp. 7003–7016, 2021

  28. [36]

    Intelligent reflecting surface (irs)-aided covert wireless communications with delay constraint,

    X. Zhou, S. Yan, Q. Wu, F. Shu, and D. W. K. Ng, “Intelligent reflecting surface (irs)-aided covert wireless communications with delay constraint,”IEEE Transactions on Wireless Communications, vol. 21, no. 1, pp. 532–547, 2022

  29. [37]

    Limits of reliable communica- tion with low probability of detection on awgn channels,

    B. A. Bash, D. Goeckel, and D. Towsley, “Limits of reliable communica- tion with low probability of detection on awgn channels,”IEEE Journal on Selected Areas in Communications, vol. 31, no. 9, pp. 1921–1930, 2013

  30. [38]

    Deep learning for joint pilot design and channel estimation in symbiotic radio communications,

    Z. Wang, H. Xu, L. Zhao, X. Chen, and A. Zhou, “Deep learning for joint pilot design and channel estimation in symbiotic radio communications,” IEEE Wireless Communications Letters, vol. 11, no. 10, pp. 2056–2060, 2022

  31. [39]

    Multiuser commu- nications with movable-antenna base station: Joint antenna positioning, receive combining, and power control,

    Z. Xiao, X. Pi, L. Zhu, X.-G. Xia, and R. Zhang, “Multiuser commu- nications with movable-antenna base station: Joint antenna positioning, receive combining, and power control,”IEEE Transactions on Wireless Communications, vol. 23, no. 12, pp. 19 744–19 759, 2024

  32. [40]

    A learning-aided flexible gradient descent approach to miso beamforming,

    Z. Yang, J.-Y . Xia, J. Luo, S. Zhang, and D. G ¨und¨uz, “A learning-aided flexible gradient descent approach to miso beamforming,”IEEE Wireless Communications Letters, vol. 11, no. 9, pp. 1895–1899, 2022

  33. [41]

    Online deep neural network for optimization in wireless communications,

    J. Gao, C. Zhong, G. Y . Li, and Z. Zhang, “Online deep neural network for optimization in wireless communications,”IEEE Wireless Communications Letters, vol. 11, no. 5, pp. 933–937, 2022

  34. [42]

    Wideband beamform- ing for ris assisted near-field communications,

    J. Wang, J. Xiao, Y . Zou, W. Xie, and Y . Liu, “Wideband beamform- ing for ris assisted near-field communications,”IEEE Transactions on Wireless Communications, vol. 23, no. 11, pp. 16 836–16 851, 2024

  35. [43]

    Multicast precoding for multigateway multibeam satellite systems with feeder link interfer- ence,

    J. Wang, L. Zhou, K. Yang, X. Wang, and Y . Liu, “Multicast precoding for multigateway multibeam satellite systems with feeder link interfer- ence,”IEEE Transactions on Wireless Communications, vol. 18, no. 3, pp. 1637–1650, 2019

  36. [44]

    Differential evolution: A survey of the state-of-the-art,

    S. Das and P. N. Suganthan, “Differential evolution: A survey of the state-of-the-art,”IEEE Transactions on Evolutionary Computation, vol. 15, no. 1, pp. 4–31, 2011

  37. [45]

    Movable antenna-aided secure full- duplex multi-user communications,

    J. Ding, Z. Zhou, and B. Jiao, “Movable antenna-aided secure full- duplex multi-user communications,”IEEE Transactions on Wireless Communications, vol. 24, no. 3, pp. 2389–2403, 2025

  38. [46]

    Joint active and passive beamforming opti- mization for intelligent reflecting surface assisted swipt under qos con- straints,

    Q. Wu and R. Zhang, “Joint active and passive beamforming opti- mization for intelligent reflecting surface assisted swipt under qos con- straints,”IEEE Journal on Selected Areas in Communications, vol. 38, no. 8, pp. 1735–1748, 2020

  39. [47]

    Joint beamforming design in multi-cluster miso noma reconfigurable intelligent surface-aided down- link communication networks,

    Y . Li, M. Jiang, Q. Zhang, and J. Qin, “Joint beamforming design in multi-cluster miso noma reconfigurable intelligent surface-aided down- link communication networks,”IEEE Transactions on Communications, vol. 69, no. 1, pp. 664–674, 2021

  40. [48]

    Rate maximization for downlink pinching-antenna systems,

    Y . Xu, Z. Ding, and G. K. Karagiannidis, “Rate maximization for downlink pinching-antenna systems,”IEEE Wireless Communications Letters, vol. 14, no. 5, pp. 1431–1435, 2025

Pith tools

Reviewed August 5, 2026 · model on record in the stance chip above.