Pith. sign in

REVIEW 3 major objections 4 minor 50 references

New evidence for weak magnetic fields in Herbig Ae/Be stars

T0 review · 3 major / 4 minor · reviewed 2026-08-14 · deepseek-v4-flash

Challenge this review Re-run · record.json Download PDF Read on arXiv ↗ Review JSON

Pith's one-line read Five Herbig Ae/Be stars show longitudinal magnetic fields between 17 and 209 G, evidence that these young intermediate-mass stars are far less magnetic than their lower-mass T Tauri cousins.

desk verdict A competent measurement letter with new SVD epochs, but the abstract's claim of intrinsically weak HAeBe fields overreaches the sparse phase coverage and the projection geometry. read the letter →

arxiv 1908.02093 v1 pith:W4WOFT2I submitted 2019-08-06 astro-ph.SR

S. P. Järvinen , T. A. Carroll , S. Hubrig , I. Ilyin , M. Schöller This is my paper · ORCID
classification astro-ph.SR
keywords HerbigAe/BestarsmagneticfieldsspectropolarimetryStokesVsingularvaluedecompositionlongitudinalfieldpre-main-sequenceZeemansignature
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal

The pith

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The reading

The paper reports new spectropolarimetric detections of very weak longitudinal magnetic fields in five Herbig Ae/Be stars, with strengths from 17 to 209 G, and uses these results to argue that intermediate-mass pre-main-sequence stars generally carry much weaker magnetic fields than T Tauri stars, which often reach kilogauss strength. The measurements come from applying the Singular Value Decomposition technique to high-resolution Stokes V spectra, which extracts coherent Zeeman signatures from many spectral lines. A polarity reversal in HD 58647 from -121 G to +209 G within a day, and a similar reversal in HD 98922 between epochs, are presented as signs of organized, likely rotating fields. If the interpretation holds, magnetic fields in these stars are too weak to drive the standard magnetospheric accretion and angular momentum transport assumed for such disks.

What carries the argument

The central tool is the Singular Value Decomposition (SVD) technique for combining many spectral-line Stokes V profiles. It identifies the small number of eigenprofiles that capture the coherent Zeeman signal shared by all selected unblended lines, then builds a weighted mean line profile in which noisy spectral regions automatically receive lower weight. The longitudinal magnetic field is obtained from the first-order moment of this mean Stokes V profile through a standard velocity-weighted formula, yielding uncertainties of only a few gauss for fields of tens of gauss. This weighting is what makes weak-field measurements in Herbig Ae/Be stars possible.

What would settle it

Measure the radial velocities of the sharp line cores over many epochs and check whether they follow the star's rotation or the Keplerian orbital motion of surrounding material; the photospheric assumption requires the former. Alternatively, rerun the SVD analysis after excluding spectral lines formed in outflow or disk gas and see whether the Stokes V Zeeman signature remains.

Watch

Extended reading notes

Core claim

Using the SVD method on high-resolution Stokes V spectra of five Herbig Ae/Be stars, the authors report definite detections of longitudinal magnetic fields in all five: HD 58647 shows -121 +/- 11 G on one night and +209 +/- 10 G two nights later; HD 98922 changed from -33 +/- 4 G in 2011 to +28 +/- 7 G in 2016; HD 139614 shows 25 +/- 3 G; HD 165133 shows 97 +/- 9 G; and HD 190073 shows fields between 17 +/- 1 G and 34 +/- 2 G across four epochs. The authors interpret these values as further evidence that Herbig Ae/Be stars possess much weaker magnetic fields than T Tauri stars, whose fields reach kilogauss strength. They also argue that the large non-detection rate in earlier surveys, where many measurements had uncertainties above 100 G, may reflect measurement limits rather than genuinely non-magnetic stars.

Load-bearing premise

The measurement assumes that the sharp absorption cores in the line profiles are formed in the stellar photosphere; if they instead arise in a circumstellar disk, wind, or accretion flow, the detected Zeeman signatures do not measure a stellar magnetic field.

Editorial extensions

If this is right

  • Typical Herbig Ae/Be stars have longitudinal magnetic fields of tens to a few hundred gauss, an order of magnitude below the kilogauss fields measured in T Tauri stars.
  • Magnetospheric accretion models used for T Tauri stars, which require kilogauss fields to funnel gas onto the stellar surface, should not be assumed for Herbig Ae/Be systems.
  • The polarity change within one night in HD 58647 shows that even weak-field Herbig Be stars can host organized, rotationally structured magnetic fields.
  • Earlier non-detections in large Herbig Ae/Be surveys do not prove the absence of fields; most of those measurements had uncertainties worse than 100 G, and SVD-based reobservation can reveal fields below that level.
  • Determining rotation periods and field geometry for these stars requires multi-epoch monitoring, since a single snapshot longitudinal field depends strongly on the observer's viewing angle.

Reading between the lines

Editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • If the photospheric-origin assumption holds, the same SVD pipeline applied to a larger magnitude-limited sample should recover a smooth distribution of longitudinal fields extending below 20 G; a blind survey of thirty or more Herbig Ae/Be stars could test whether the median field really is that low.
  • The polarity flip of roughly 330 G in HD 58647 within about a day implies a strongly tilted or small-scale field geometry; if a rotation period can be measured, the Stokes V phase curve would distinguish a dipolar field from a complex multipolar one.
  • Because the SVD method uses only the narrow, presumably photospheric line cores, masking out variable broad components before analysis would allow a clean test of whether accretion-related line variability contaminates the Zeeman signature.
Share X Bluesky LinkedIn Reddit HN

Signed reviews

No signed human review yet.

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, and a circularity audit.

Referee Report

3 major / 4 minor

Summary. The paper presents new HARPSpol spectropolarimetric observations of five Herbig Ae/Be stars and reports longitudinal magnetic field measurements obtained with the Singular Value Decomposition (SVD) technique. The authors report definite detections with low false-alarm probabilities, including the strongest field of 209 G in HD 58647, a weak field of 17 G in HD 190073, and polarity changes for HD 58647 and HD 98922. The paper interprets these results as further evidence that Herbig Ae/Be stars possess much weaker magnetic fields than T Tauri stars, whose fields are of kG order.

Significance. If the detections are correct, the paper provides useful new longitudinal-field measurements for a small sample of Herbig Ae/Be stars, a class for which accurate magnetic measurements remain challenging. The use of SVD with low measurement uncertainties and the display of diagnostic null profiles are strengths, and the reported false-alarm probabilities support the reality of the Stokes V signals. However, the central astrophysical conclusion that these stars have intrinsically weaker fields than T Tauri stars is not justified by the longitudinal-field measurements alone, because such measurements are strongly projection- and phase-dependent. The paper also relies on an unverified assumption that the sharp line cores of HD 58647 are photospheric. The individual measurements remain a useful contribution if the interpretation is appropriately qualified.

major comments (3)
  1. [Abstract; Sec. 4, Discussion] The claim that the results 'provide further evidence that Herbig Ae/Be stars possess much weaker magnetic fields than their lower mass counterpart T Tauri stars with magnetic fields of kG order' is not supported by the measured longitudinal fields alone. Equation (1) measures the disk-integrated line-of-sight component, and Sec. 4 correctly concedes that 'single snapshot observations are not sufficient' because of the strong dependence on viewing angle. For a dipolar field, a kG-order polar field can easily produce longitudinal fields of 17-209 G depending on inclination, obliquity, and rotation phase; the sparse sampling in Table 1 (one or two epochs per star) does not constrain the intrinsic field strength. The abstract and Discussion should be revised to state that the observations are consistent with weak longitudinal fields, not that they establish intrinsically weak surface fields.
  2. [Sec. 3.1, HD 58647] The assumption stated in Sec. 3.1 that 'the sharp cores observed in the line profiles are originating in the stellar photosphere' is load-bearing for the interpretation of the HD 58647 detection. The paper itself describes complex line profiles with sharp absorption components and a disk-wind model for this star (citing Kurosawa et al. 2016). If the sharp cores are formed in a circumstellar disk or wind rather than the photosphere, the Stokes V signal and the derived -121 G and +209 G values would not measure a stellar magnetic field. The authors should justify this assumption, for example by showing that the SVD signal is dominated by lines with photospheric origins or by comparing the observed Stokes V profile with a model that includes non-photospheric contamination.
  3. [Sec. 3.1; Table 1] The text says that the HD 58647 measurements 'show a change of polarity within one day' from -121 G to +209 G, but the tabulated heliocentric Julian dates are 57908.483 and 57910.467, which differ by about 1.98 days, not one day. In addition, the Table 1 entry for HJD 57911.468 lists no field value; the paper should state whether this observation was not usable or yielded a non-detection. These discrepancies should be corrected.
minor comments (4)
  1. [Abstract] The sentence 'In recent years Herbig Ae/Be stars receive considerable attention' would read better as 'have received considerable attention'.
  2. [References] In the reference for Järvinen et al. (2019), the author list contains 'Ilyin I.' twice.
  3. [References] The journal name 'Astronomsche Nachrichten' in Järvinen et al. (2016) is misspelled; it should be 'Astronomische Nachrichten'.
  4. [Sec. 3.6] The statement that only HD 139614 shows subexposure variability is based on Fig. 3, but the figure caption does not identify which star is shown until the main text; adding an explicit star name to the caption would improve clarity.

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged · score 0.0 of 10

No significant circularity: the field measurements are computed from observed Stokes V profiles via a published moment formula, not from the paper's conclusion.

full rationale

The derivation chain in this paper is the measurement of longitudinal magnetic fields from spectropolarimetric observations. The fields are obtained from SVD-combined Stokes V profiles using the first-order moment formula of Mathys (1989), Eq. (1), with line masks based on stellar parameters and line lists. No parameter is fitted to the target claim that Herbig Ae/Be stars have weak magnetic fields, and the quoted field values are not constructed from any prior conclusion about field weakness. The SVD technique is cited from the authors' earlier work, but the method is presented transparently and the field values are computed directly from observed profiles; the self-citations are methodological, not load-bearing for the astrophysical conclusion. The paper's central interpretation, that the measured longitudinal fields imply intrinsically weaker fields than in T Tauri stars, rests on an astrophysical assumption about the relation between <B_z> and surface field strength, and the paper itself concedes that single snapshot observations are not sufficient owing to the geometric dependence of the longitudinal field. That is a limitation or correctness risk, not circularity. No equation in the paper reduces to its own input, and no fitted parameter is renamed as a prediction. The analysis is therefore self-contained as a measurement study, even if the broader conclusion may be debated on observational grounds.

Assumptions & free parameters 0 free parameters · 4 assumptions · 0 invented entities

No free parameters are fitted to the data; the fields are direct moment measurements. The main auxiliary assumptions are the validity of the SVD pipeline and the photospheric origin of the line cores. No new physical entities are introduced.

assumptions (4)
  • domain assumption SVD of Carroll et al. (2012) yields a mean Stokes V profile from which the first-moment formula (Eq. 1) recovers the true longitudinal field
    The entire measurement pipeline depends on this method being unbiased for weak fields; the paper cites earlier works by the same group rather than validating against external magnetic standards.
  • ad hoc to paper The sharp absorption cores in HD 58647 are photospheric
    Explicitly assumed in Section 3.1; not tested, and a third observation of this star yielded no usable measurement.
  • domain assumption FAP thresholds (definite detection below 1e-5) from Donati et al. 1992 classify the detections
    Used to label all detections as definite in Table 1; no independent significance calibration is presented.
  • domain assumption Literature Teff and log g for each star are appropriate for building the SVD line masks
    Masks are based on published parameters (e.g. Merín 2004, Montesinos et al. 2009, Folsom et al. 2012); wrong parameters would bias line selection and the mean Landé factor.

how reviews work

0 comments
Cite this review

Pith. "Pith review of New evidence for weak magnetic fields in Herbig Ae/Be stars." pith.science (2026). https://pith.science/paper/W4WOFT2I

@misc{pith2026190802093,
  author       = {Pith},
  title        = {Pith review of: New evidence for weak magnetic fields in Herbig Ae/Be stars},
  year         = {2026},
  howpublished = {\url{https://pith.science/paper/W4WOFT2I}},
  note         = {Machine review of arXiv:1908.02093}
}
read the original abstract

In recent years Herbig Ae/Be stars receive considerable attention as their disks are believed to be the sites of on-going planet formation. Confirming the presence of magnetic fields in these stars is critical for understanding the transport of angular momentum during the protostellar phase. Furthermore, magnetic fields set the conditions for strongly anisotropic accretion. In this study we present the results of our recent observing campaigns of a sample of Herbig Ae/Be stars aimed at measurements of their magnetic fields applying the Singular Value Decomposition method to high resolution spectropolarimetric observations. The strongest longitudinal magnetic field of 209 G is detected in the Herbig Be star HD 58647, whereas the weakest field of 17 G is measured in the Herbig Ae star HD 190073. A change of polarity is detected for HD 58647 and in the Herbig Be star HD 98922. The obtained results provide further evidence that Herbig Ae/Be stars possess much weaker magnetic fields than their lower mass counterpart T Tauri stars with magnetic fields of kG order.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 1908.02093 by the authors.

Figure 1
Figure 1. SVD Stokes I (bottom), V (middle), and diagnostic null (N) profiles (top) for the five Herbig Ae/Be stars in our sample. high resolution HARPS spectra of this star show traces of splitting and lines belonging to different elements exhibit dif￾ferent shapes of their profiles, suggesting that some elements are inhomogeneously distributed on the stellar surface. The interferometric study by Kraus et al. (2008) indicate… view at source ↗
Figure 2
Figure 2. Overplotted SVD Stokes I profiles for our sample stars with multiple observations. 6140 6142 6144 6146 6148 6150 0.8 0.9 1.0 1.1 1.2 6140 6142 6144 6146 6148 6150 Wavelength [Å] 0.8 0.9 1.0 1.1 1.2 I/IC [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p005_2.png] view at source ↗
Figure 3
Figure 3. Bottom: Two overplotted subexposures for HD 139614 separated by 37 min. Top: Difference between the two spectra expanded by a factor of 3. The detected differences in the line profiles indicate that the star is probably pulsating. stars are poorly known (e.g. Hubrig et al. 2011a,b). The ob￾served light variations in these stars are likely of stochas￾tic nature and caused by fluctuating disk accretion. Multi￾epoch ro… view at source ↗

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

50 extracted references · 49 canonical work pages

  1. [1]

    Acke B., Waelkens C., 2004, , 427, 1009

    work page 2004

  2. [2]

    Alecian E., Neiner C., Mathis S., Catala C., Kochukhov O., Landstreet J., 2013a, , 549, L8

    work page

  3. [3]

    Alecian E., et al., 2013b, , 429, 1001

    work page

  4. [4]

    Appenzeller I., et al., 1998, The Messenger, 94, 1

    work page 1998

  5. [5]

    E., 2006, , 641, 949

    Banerjee R., Pudritz R. E., 2006, , 641, 949

    work page 2006

  6. [6]

    D., Simon T., Najita J

    Brittain S. D., Simon T., Najita J. R., Rettig T. W., 2007, , 659, 685

    work page 2007

  7. [7]

    Carmona A., et al., 2017, , 598, 118

    work page 2017

  8. [8]

    A., Strassmeier K

    Carroll T. A., Strassmeier K. G., Rice J. B., K\"unstler A., 2012, , 548, 95

    work page 2012

Show all 50 references
  1. [9]

    Catala C., et al., 2007, , 462, 293

    2007

  2. [10]

    L., 2007, , 134, 1368

    Chen L., de Grijs R., Zhao J. L., 2007, , 134, 1368

    2007

  3. [11]

    R., Hubrig S., 2012, Astronomische Nachrichten, 333, 34

    Cowley C. R., Hubrig S., 2012, Astronomische Nachrichten, 333, 34

    2012

  4. [12]

    E., 1992, , 265, 669

    Donati J.-F., Semel M., Rees D. E., 1992, , 265, 669

    1992

  5. [13]

    D., Rees D

    Donati J.-F., Semel M., Carter B. D., Rees D. E., Collier Cameron A., 1997, , 291, 658

    1997

  6. [14]

    A., Lane B

    Eisner J. A., Lane B. F., Hillenbrand L. A., Akeson R. L., Sargent A. I., 2004, , 613, 1049

    2004

  7. [15]

    P., Bagnulo S., Wade G

    Folsom C. P., Bagnulo S., Wade G. A., Alecian E., Landstreet J. D., Marsden S. C., Waite I. A., 2012, , 422, 2072

    2012

  8. [16]

    A., et al., 1996, , 120, 157

    Grady C. A., et al., 1996, , 120, 157

    1996

  9. [17]

    M., Kuhn J

    Harrington D. M., Kuhn J. R., 2009, , 180, 138

    2009

  10. [18]

    V., 2004, , 428, L1

    Hubrig S., Sch \"o ller M., Yudin R. V., 2004, , 428, L1

    2004

  11. [19]

    V., Sch\"oller M., Pogodin M

    Hubrig S., Yudin R. V., Sch\"oller M., Pogodin M. A., 2006, , 446, 1089

    2006

  12. [20]

    A., Yudin R

    Hubrig S., Pogodin M. A., Yudin R. V., Sch\"oller M., Schnerr R. S., 2007, , 463, 1039

    2007

  13. [21]

    Hubrig S., et al., 2009, , 502, 283

    2009

  14. [22]

    Hubrig S., et al., 2011a, , 525, L4

  15. [23]

    Hubrig S., et al., 2011b, , 536, A45

  16. [24]

    F., Elkin V

    Hubrig S., Castelli F., Gonz \'a lez J. F., Elkin V. G., Mathys G., Cowley C. R., Wolff B., Sch \"o ller M., 2012, , 542, 31

    2012

  17. [25]

    Hubrig S., Ilyin I., Sch \"o ller M., Lo Curto G., 2013, Astronomische Nachrichten, 334, 1093

    2013

  18. [26]

    A., Sch\"oller M., Ilyin I., 2015, , 449, L118

    Hubrig S., Carroll T. A., Sch\"oller M., Ilyin I., 2015, , 449, L118

    2015

  19. [27]

    arvinen S. P., Carroll T. A., Hubrig S., Sch\

    J\"arvinen S. P., Carroll T. A., Hubrig S., Sch\"oller M., Ilyin I., Korhonen H., Pogodin M., Drake N. A., 2015, , 584, 15

    2015

  20. [28]

    arvinen S. P., Hubrig S., Sch\

    J\"arvinen S. P., Hubrig S., Sch\"oller M., Ilyin I., Carroll T. A., Korhonen H., 2016, Astronomsche Nachrichten, 337, 329

    2016

  21. [29]

    P., et al., 2018, , 858, 18

    J\"arvinen S. P., et al., 2018, , 858, 18

    2018

  22. [30]

    arvinen S. P., Carroll T. A., Hubrig S., Ilyin I., Sch\

    J\"arvinen S. P., Carroll T. A., Hubrig S., Ilyin I., Sch\"oller M., Ilyin I., Drake N. A., Pogodin M. A., 2019, , 486, 5499

    2019

  23. [31]

    Kraus S., et al., 2008, , 489, 1157

    2008

  24. [32]

    Kupka F., Dubernet M.-L., VAMDC Collaboration, 2011, Baltic Astronomy, 20, 503

    2011

  25. [33]

    Kurosawa R., et al., 2016, , 457, 2236

    2016

  26. [34]

    Mathys G., 1989, Fundam. Cosm. Phys., 13, 143

    1989

  27. [35]

    Mathys G., 1994, , 108, 547

    1994

  28. [36]

    Matter A., et al., 2014, , 561, 26

    2014

  29. [37]

    Matter A., et al., 2016, , 586, 11

    2016

  30. [38]

    Thesis, Universidad Aut\'onoma, Madrid, Spain, http://www.laeff.inta.es/EXPORT/thesis/bmerin\_thesis.pdf

    Mer\'in B., 2004, Ph.D. Thesis, Universidad Aut\'onoma, Madrid, Spain, http://www.laeff.inta.es/EXPORT/thesis/bmerin\_thesis.pdf

    2004

  31. [39]

    Montesinos B., Eiroa C., Mora A., Mer\'in B., 2009, , 495, 901

    2009

  32. [40]

    C., Vink J

    Mottram J. C., Vink J. S., Oudmaijer R. D., Patel M., 2007, , 377, 1363

    2007

  33. [41]

    L., Stempels H

    Ryabchikova T., Piskunov N., Kurucz R. L., Stempels H. C., Heiter U., Pakhomov Y., Barklem P. S., 2015, , 90, 054005

    2015

  34. [42]

    Snik F., Jeffers S., Keller C., Piskunov N., Kochukhov O., Valenti J., Johns-Krull C., 2008, SPIE Conf.\ Series, 7014, E22

    2008

  35. [43]

    A., Pringle J

    Tout C. A., Pringle J. E., 1995, , 272, 528

    1995

  36. [44]

    S., de Winter D., P\'erez M

    Th\'e P. S., de Winter D., P\'erez M. R., 1994, , 104, 351

    1994

  37. [45]

    E., de Winter D., Tjin A Djie H

    van den Ancker M. E., de Winter D., Tjin A Djie H. R. E., 1998, , 330, 145

    1998

  38. [46]

    S., Drew J

    Vink J. S., Drew J. E., Harries T. J., Oudmaijer R. D., 2002, , 337, 356

    2002

  39. [47]

    A., et al., 2005, , 442, L31

    Wade G. A., et al., 2005, , 442, L31

    2005

  40. [48]

    A., Bagnulo S., Drouin D., Landstreet J

    Wade G. A., Bagnulo S., Drouin D., Landstreet J. D., Monin D., 2007, , 376, 1145

    2007

  41. [49]

    Wallenquist ., 1939, Annals of the Bosscha Observatory Lembang (Java) Indonesia, 5, 1

    1939

  42. [50]

    Zwintz K., Guenther D., Kallinger T., 2008, CoAst, 157, 256

    2008

Pith tools

Reviewed August 14, 2026 · model on record in the stance chip above.