Hecke Eigenvalues of Ikeda Lifts
Pith reviewed 2026-05-19 18:47 UTC · model grok-4.3
The pith
Hecke eigenvalues of Ikeda lifts are positive for all sufficiently large primes.
A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.
Core claim
Using the spherical map for the Hecke algebra of the symplectic group, the authors obtain an explicit formula for the eigenvalues λ_F(p^r) of Ikeda lifts. From this formula, they show that λ_F(p^r) can be written as a polynomial in p^{±1/2} with a positive leading term. The coefficients of this polynomial are bounded, and therefore the Hecke eigenvalues λ_F(p^r) are positive for all sufficiently large primes p.
What carries the argument
The spherical map for the Hecke algebra of the symplectic group, which transfers the Hecke eigenvalues from the Ikeda lift to an explicit algebraic expression.
If this is right
- λ_F(p^r) can be expressed as a polynomial in p^{±1/2} with positive leading term.
- The coefficients of this polynomial are bounded.
- λ_F(p^r) is positive for all sufficiently large primes p.
Where Pith is reading between the lines
- This positivity might help establish non-vanishing results for associated L-functions at special points.
- The same approach could extend to other lifts or to higher powers in related groups.
Load-bearing premise
The spherical map for the Hecke algebra of the symplectic group correctly transfers the Hecke eigenvalues from the Ikeda lift to an explicit algebraic expression that can be analyzed as a polynomial.
What would settle it
Computing the Hecke eigenvalues λ_F(p^r) explicitly for a known Ikeda lift and a large prime p, and checking whether the value is positive or not.
read the original abstract
In this paper, we study the Hecke eigenvalues of Ikeda lifts. Using the spherical map for the Hecke algebra of the symplectic group, we obtain an explicit formula for the eigenvalues $\lambda_F(p^r)$. From this formula, we show that $\lambda_F(p^r)$ can be written as a polynomial in $p^{\pm 1/2}$ with a positive leading term. Furthermore, we prove that the coefficients of this polynomial are bounded and, as a consequence, the Hecke eigenvalues $\lambda_F(p^r)$ are positive for all sufficiently large primes $p$.
Editorial analysis
A structured set of objections, weighed in public.
Referee Report
Summary. The manuscript derives an explicit formula for the Hecke eigenvalues λ_F(p^r) of Ikeda lifts by applying the spherical map to the Hecke algebra of the symplectic group. It then rewrites this formula as a polynomial in p^{±1/2} possessing a positive leading term whose coefficients are bounded, from which positivity of λ_F(p^r) for all sufficiently large primes p is deduced.
Significance. If the derivation is correct, the result supplies a concrete, analyzable expression for the Hecke eigenvalues of Ikeda lifts and establishes their eventual positivity. This contributes to the study of eigenvalue distributions for Siegel modular forms and may aid in applications involving L-functions or bounds on automorphic representations. The use of the spherical map to reach a parameter-free polynomial form is a methodological strength.
minor comments (2)
- The transition from the spherical map to the explicit polynomial expression would be clearer if a short verification for small values of r (e.g., r=1 or r=2) were included to confirm the leading coefficient and boundedness.
- The introduction would benefit from a brief comparison with existing results on Hecke eigenvalues of other lifts (such as Saito-Kurokawa or Maass lifts) to better situate the novelty of the positivity statement.
Simulated Author's Rebuttal
We thank the referee for the positive assessment of our manuscript and for recommending minor revision. The referee's summary accurately captures our use of the spherical map to derive an explicit formula for the Hecke eigenvalues of Ikeda lifts, the rewriting as a polynomial in p^{±1/2} with positive leading term and bounded coefficients, and the resulting positivity statement for large primes. We are glad that the potential contributions to eigenvalue distributions and L-function applications are noted.
Circularity Check
No significant circularity identified
full rationale
The derivation begins with the spherical map for the Hecke algebra of the symplectic group to produce an explicit formula for λ_F(p^r). This formula is then rewritten as a polynomial in p^{±1/2} whose leading term is positive and whose remaining coefficients are shown to be bounded, implying positivity for all sufficiently large p. None of these steps reduces by construction to a fitted parameter, a self-referential definition, or a load-bearing self-citation. The explicit algebraic expression and the subsequent polynomial analysis constitute independent mathematical content that does not presuppose the final positivity statement.
Axiom & Free-Parameter Ledger
axioms (1)
- domain assumption The spherical map for the Hecke algebra of the symplectic group produces the correct eigenvalues for the Ikeda lift.
Lean theorems connected to this paper
-
IndisputableMonolith/Foundation/RealityFromDistinction.leanreality_from_one_distinction unclear?
unclearRelation between the paper passage and the cited Recognition theorem.
Using the spherical map for the Hecke algebra of the symplectic group, we obtain an explicit formula for the eigenvalues λ_F(p^r). From this formula, we show that λ_F(p^r) can be written as a polynomial in p^{±1/2} with a positive leading term.
-
IndisputableMonolith/Cost/FunctionalEquation.leanwashburn_uniqueness_aczel unclear?
unclearRelation between the paper passage and the cited Recognition theorem.
λ_F(p^r) = p^{r(nk - n/2)} ∑ ... φ_{2n}(p^{-1}) / (φ_{k1}(p^{-1}) ... φ_{kt}(p^{-1}))
What do these tags mean?
- matches
- The paper's claim is directly supported by a theorem in the formal canon.
- supports
- The theorem supports part of the paper's argument, but the paper may add assumptions or extra steps.
- extends
- The paper goes beyond the formal theorem; the theorem is a base layer rather than the whole result.
- uses
- The paper appears to rely on the theorem as machinery.
- contradicts
- The paper's claim conflicts with a theorem or certificate in the canon.
- unclear
- Pith found a possible connection, but the passage is too broad, indirect, or ambiguous to say the theorem truly supports the claim.
discussion (0)
Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.