REVIEW 1 cited by
pLUTo: Enabling Massively Parallel Computation in DRAM via Lookup Tables
Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.
This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.
SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event
T0 review · schema-true
One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.
pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp
abstract
Data movement between the main memory and the processor is a key contributor to execution time and energy consumption in memory-intensive applications. This data movement bottleneck can be alleviated using Processing-in-Memory (PiM). One category of PiM is Processing-using-Memory (PuM), in which computation takes place inside the memory array by exploiting intrinsic analog properties of the memory device. PuM yields high performance and energy efficiency, but existing PuM techniques support a limited range of operations. As a result, current PuM architectures cannot efficiently perform some complex operations (e.g., multiplication, division, exponentiation) without large increases in chip area and design complexity. To overcome these limitations of existing PuM architectures, we introduce pLUTo (processing-using-memory with lookup table (LUT) operations), a DRAM-based PuM architecture that leverages the high storage density of DRAM to enable the massively parallel storing and querying of lookup tables (LUTs). The key idea of pLUTo is to replace complex operations with low-cost, bulk memory reads (i.e., LUT queries) instead of relying on complex extra logic. We evaluate pLUTo across 11 real-world workloads that showcase the limitations of prior PuM approaches and show that our solution outperforms optimized CPU and GPU baselines by an average of 713$\times$ and 1.2$\times$, respectively, while simultaneously reducing energy consumption by an average of 1855$\times$ and 39.5$\times$. Across these workloads, pLUTo outperforms state-of-the-art PiM architectures by an average of 18.3$\times$. We also show that different versions of pLUTo provide different levels of flexibility and performance at different additional DRAM area overheads (between 10.2% and 23.1%). pLUTo's source code is openly and fully available at https://github.com/CMU-SAFARI/pLUTo.
Forward citations
Cited by 1 Pith paper
-
Clutch: High Performance Vector-Scalar Comparison using DRAM via Chunked Temporal Coding
Clutch accelerates vector-scalar comparisons in PuD systems via chunked temporal coding, delivering 2.9x throughput and 3.0x energy gains over prior bit-serial PuD while also mapping decision tree inference to PuD for...
Discussion (0). Sign in to comment.