Pith. sign in

REVIEW 3 major objections 3 minor 33 references

Solar H-alpha features with hot onsets. IV. Network fibrils

T0 review · 3 major / 3 minor · reviewed 2026-08-14 · deepseek-v4-flash

Challenge this review Re-run · record.json Download PDF Read on arXiv ↗ Review JSON

Pith's one-line read Many dark H-alpha fibrils spreading from network regions are cooling contrails left by rapid type II spicule heating events, according to statistical time-delay analysis of the H-alpha chromosphere.

desk verdict A serious, data-rich case for the contrail-fibril idea that stops short of proof because the statistics lack any null control for recurrent co-location. read the letter →

arxiv 1908.09315 v2 pith:W7PWFHDE submitted 2019-08-25 astro-ph.SR

Robert J. Rutten , Luc H. M. Rouppe van der Voort , Bart De Pontieu This is my paper · ORCID
classification astro-ph.SR
keywords solarchromosphereH-alphafibrilstypeIIspiculesrapidblue-shiftedexcursionsred-shiftednon-equilibriumhydrogenionizationnetworktime-delaystatistics
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal

The pith

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The reading

This paper tries to establish that many of the slender dark H-alpha fibrils spreading outward from solar network regions are cooling aftermaths of small, rapid heating events, not pre-existing cool structures. Using two high-resolution H-alpha sequences, the authors show that the moments when a pixel is darkest in the blue wing, marking a rapid blue-shifted excursion (RBE) and the on-disk signature of a type II spicule, are followed 2 to 5 minutes later by the moment when that same pixel is darkest in the H-alpha line core. They interpret this statistical dark-dark association as a causal chain: the heating event ionizes hydrogen along its track, and the subsequent recombination and slow non-equilibrium settling of the $n=2$ level of hydrogen overproduce H-alpha opacity, so the cooling track appears as a dark fibril. If true, the fibrilar appearance of the chromosphere around network is largely a map of recent small-scale heating, and the paper concludes that type II spicules are a major agent in producing network dark fibrils.

What carries the argument

The load-bearing mechanism is intermittent hydrogen ionization followed by delayed non-equilibrium H-alpha overopacity: a brief heating event, such as an RBE or RRE type II spicule or a smaller unresolved agent, ionizes hydrogen along a thin track, and as the gas cools the $n=2$ population controlling H-alpha extinction decays slowly because collisional detailed balance in Ly-alpha is slow at low temperature, so the track stays dark for minutes. The statistical instrument is the time-delay scatter analysis in Strous format, which compares blue-wing RBE darkening with line-core and red-core darkening at delays from 0 to 12 minutes; it is supplemented by darkest-pixel composite images and per-pixel delay histograms that isolate the 2 to 5 minute positive-delay peak and the recurrence of darkest RBE instances in 3 to 5 minute groups.

What would settle it

Take the darkest-pixel delay maps and shuffle the RBE occurrence times per pixel while keeping the same spatial mask; if the 2 to 5 minute positive-delay peak survives the shuffle at the same strength, the dark-dark association is not causal. A direct spatial test is also decisive: the delayed dark fibrils should lie along the continuation of the RBE track and retract toward the network root, so darkening at RBE pixels with no track-aligned extension, or appearing simultaneously with the RBE, would argue against the contrail interpretation.

Watch

Extended reading notes

Core claim

The central discovery claim is that the dark H-alpha fibrils around network are, to a large extent, the cooling aftermath of type II spicules, rapid, short-lived chromospheric jets seen on the disk as rapid blue-shifted and red-shifted excursions (RBEs and RREs), and of similar but smaller unresolved heating agents. Along a spicule track, hydrogen is heated and partially or fully ionized; when the gas cools, recombination together with slow collisional settling in the Ly-alpha line leaves the $n=2$ level of hydrogen overpopulated for minutes, producing a strong non-equilibrium increase in H-alpha extinction. That opacity excess makes the cooling track appear as a dark fibril, the chromospheric analogue of an airplane contrail. The evidence is statistical: in time-delay scatter diagrams, darkest-pixel maps, and delay histograms from two high-resolution H-alpha sequences, the darkest blue-wing RBE moments at a pixel are preferentially followed within 2 to 5 minutes by the darkest line-core or red-core darkening at that pixel, and the same locations build up dark-dark association in time-averaged images. On this basis the paper concludes that type II spicules represent a major agent in the production of dark fibrils around network.

Load-bearing premise

The delayed 2 to 5 minute darkening at RBE locations is caused by the RBE heating event itself, rather than by independent recurrent events that happen to occupy the same network pixels.

Editorial extensions

If this is right

  • If the claim is right, a large share of the slender dark fibrils around network are chronologically ordered traces of recent heating: a spicule launch first, a dark fibril minutes later, often retracting toward the network root.
  • Because RBEs live only about half a minute while their dark aftermaths persist for minutes, many more dark fibrils than spicules will be visible at any instant, resolving the apparent mismatch between sparse RBE detections and dense fibril scenes.
  • H-alpha fibril darkness becomes a history diagnostic rather than a temperature diagnostic: it records gas that was recently hot enough to ionize hydrogen, so modeling network fibrils requires time-dependent non-equilibrium hydrogen opacity and the local Ly-alpha radiation environment.
  • The chromosphere around network would have to be understood as a three-dimensional, time-dependent, intermittently heated domain rather than a slowly varying plane-parallel layer, with much of the heating occurring below current resolution.
  • The same delayed-opacity argument could extend to other H-alpha features such as Ellerman bombs, surges, filaments, and prominences, as the paper suggests.

Reading between the lines

Editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • If the causal chain holds, the dark fibril itself could be used as a high-cadence detector of prior heating history, with its darkness and decay time constraining the peak temperature and ionization fraction of the spicule that produced it.
  • A forward-modeling test would close the loop: simulate a single RBE track with time-dependent hydrogen kinetics, synthesize the H-alpha spectrum, and check whether a dark fibril appears 2 to 5 minutes later with the observed orientation and retraction.
  • The same time-delay statistics applied to diagnostics without Ly-alpha-controlled opacity, such as Ca ii 8542 Å or millimeter continua, could test whether the delayed darkening is specific to H-alpha's non-equilibrium mechanism or shared by other lines.
  • If the contrail interpretation survives, tracking the apparent motion and decay of dark fibrils could map the full trajectories and recurrence statistics of type II spicules more completely than the short-lived blue-wing detections, potentially informing coronal mass and energy budgets.
Share X Bluesky LinkedIn Reddit HN

Signed reviews

No signed human review yet.

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, and a circularity audit.

Referee Report

3 major / 3 minor

Summary. The paper analyzes two high-resolution SST/CRISP H-alpha image sequences of quiet-Sun network bordering a coronal hole, building on the earlier RBE/RRE catalogs of Rouppe van der Voort et al. (2009) and the single-event case of Rutten & Rouppe van der Voort (2017). It uses time-delay scatter diagrams, RBE-aligned stacked cutouts, darkest-pixel maps, delay histograms, and time-averaged comparisons to search for statistical associations between blue-wing RBE/RRE darkenings and dark H-alpha core or red-core features appearing a few minutes later. The authors interpret the resulting 2–5 min dark-dark associations as cooling, recombining gas outlining the tracks of intermittent type II spicule heating events, and conclude that type II spicules are a major agent in producing dark fibrils around network. The analysis is purely observational and correlation-based; no model is fitted and no machine-checked proofs or code are claimed, though the IDL tools and SHOWEX browser are referenced.

Significance. If the causal association is established, the paper would significantly change the standard picture of H-alpha network fibrils by identifying them as classifiable aftermaths of small-scale heating events, and it would strengthen the case that nonequilibrium hydrogen opacity, rather than static temperature structure, controls H-alpha fibril visibility. The paper has notable strengths: it reuses an independently defined RBE skeleton list, presents two complementary datasets, includes a resolution-degradation control (Fig. 7), separates network from internetwork areas (Fig. 10), and makes a specific, falsifiable prediction about the delay between wing and core darkening. However, the central claim currently rests on visual inspection of scatter contours and histograms without a statistical null model, so the significance of the result is conditional on additional controls.

major comments (3)
  1. [Section 5; Figs. 12–14] The central claim that the 2–5 min delayed H-alpha core darkening at RBE locations is caused by the preceding RBE heating event is not yet established because the delay statistics are never compared with a null model. Section 4 itself notes that RBEs recur every ~84 s at fixed network locations and that dynamic fibrils and RREs occupy the same pixels; under an independence-with-co-location null, a pixel with several recurrent events will have its deepest wing and deepest core events separated by an interval drawn from the event-rate distribution, and the [−2,+2] min exclusion gap biases the nearest allowed separation toward exactly the +2–5 min range emphasized in Fig. 14. The 26%/19% fill fractions and the 43%/27% "directly associated" percentages in Sect. 5 therefore do not demonstrate an excess over chance. I request a permutation or time-shift control, for example randomizing event times at fixed pixels or correlating darkest core maps with darkest wing maps shifted by a large fixed offset, with the resulting null distributions reported.
  2. [Figs. 9, 10, 12; Sect. 3] The "darkest value per pixel" constructs are affected by a common-seeing selection that is not controlled. The authors state that selecting the darkest value sequence-wide implies selecting moments of good seeing for both the wing and the core samples; because seeing quality varies on timescales comparable to the delays, two independent darkenings at the same pixel could both be selected preferentially on good-seeing frames and produce a spurious 2–5 min association even in the absence of a physical link. The resolution-degradation test in Fig. 7 addresses instantaneous scatter spurs, but not the sequence-wide extremal selection used in Figs. 9–12. Please add a control using seeing-matched random time pairs or restrict the extremal analysis to a fixed good-seeing subset.
  3. [Sect. 5; Figs. 8–11] The term "highly significant" is used repeatedly for the dark-dark spurs, but the paper provides no statistical significance measure. The Pearson and quadrant correlation coefficients are descriptive, and the Strous-format contours are binned densities without uncertainties. Given the strong spatial and temporal autocorrelation of the data, the apparent significance of the spurs cannot be judged visually. At minimum, the authors should report bootstrap confidence intervals on the quadrant coefficients or compare the spur strengths against the same quantities computed from time-shifted image pairs.
minor comments (3)
  1. [Abstract and throughout] The word "fibrilar" appears throughout; the standard spelling is "fibrillar." This should be corrected in the abstract, text, and figure captions.
  2. [Fig. 14] The y-axis label "px/bin" in the lower histograms is ambiguous; the caption defines the axis as a fraction of the network area, so the label should read "pixels per bin as fraction of network area" or similar.
  3. [Sect. 5] The sentence containing "mean RBE recurrence time of of 84 s" contains a duplicated "of" and should be corrected.

Circularity Check

1 steps flagged · score 6.0 of 10

The 2–5 min delay peak used to prove RBE-to-fibril causality is partly an artifact of the extreme-value selection and the ±2 min exclusion gap.

  1. other [Section 3, Figs. 12–14 (delay-histogram construction and interpretation)]
    "We excluded delays within the [−2, +2] min range because Fig. 13 shows that many RBEs have dark cores that would contribute same-feature sampling with self-correlation. The histograms show systematic patterns that differ strongly from a horizontal distribution for no association. Both panels show a peak to the right of the gap that implies a high probability that the core reached its darkest value a few minutes after the darkest RBE."

    The histogram peak is produced by the operational definition, not measured as a causal delay. The delay is the difference between each pixel's sequence-wide darkest blue-wing time and its darkest core time, with all delays inside [−2,+2] min discarded. Under the appropriate no-association null of independent occurrence times, the two extreme times are each approximately uniform over the observing window, so the conditional density of D = T_core − T_wing given |D|>2 is proportional to T−|D|, with its maximum exactly at |D| = 2 min and a symmetric linear decay. That is precisely the 'peak to the right of the gap' and 'decays reach symmetry beyond six minutes' reported by the paper.

full rationale

This is not a globally circular paper: RBE identification comes from the independent Pub A skeleton list, the nonequilibrium-overopacity interpretation is imported from external simulations (Carlsson & Stein 2002; Leenaarts et al. 2007), and no model parameters are fitted to the data. The central causal claim, however, leans heavily on the delay histograms in Fig. 14, which are built by selecting per-pixel sequence-wide extremes and then discarding delays within ±2 min. The resulting histogram shape—peaks immediately outside the gap and symmetric decay beyond ~6 min—is the shape imposed by the extreme-value-plus-gap construction under a null of independent event times. The paper compares this against a 'horizontal' no-association distribution and reads the gap-adjacent peak as evidence that the darkest core follows the darkest RBE by 2–5 min. That inference is partially circular: the peak location is forced by the selection procedure. Fixed-lag scatter spurs, case examples, and time-averaged maps retain some independent evidentiary content, so the circularity is partial rather than total; the score is 6.

Assumptions & free parameters 3 free parameters · 3 assumptions · 0 invented entities

The central correlation result is not derived from a model with fitted parameters; it is an observational statistical association. The parameters listed are analysis choices (seeing thresholds, delay window, mask thresholds) that shape the statistics. The physical interpretation imports assumptions from prior simulations about H-alpha opacity and from prior identification of RBEs as type II spicules; these are domain assumptions, not circularly derived here.

free parameters (3)
  • Seeing quality thresholds = 25% (data A), 33% (data B) worst images discarded
    Chosen by hand to balance image sharpness against statistics. Affects all whole-sequence analyses; the paper tests the effect of degraded resolution qualitatively (Fig. 7) but does not assess sensitivity to the exact threshold values.
  • Delay window for aftermath sampling = 2 to 5 min positive delay
    Chosen post hoc to capture the peaks in Fig. 14 and based on the Pub B case. The fill fractions (26% and 19%) depend on this window; the paper does not report how they change with window bounds.
  • Network versus internetwork mask thresholds = Brightness threshold on a 200-pixel boxcar-smoothed time-averaged image at +0.4 Å
    Adopted by inspection to separate network from internetwork. The exact threshold is not specified numerically, and the mask affects the scatter statistics in Figs. 10-12, 15-16.
assumptions (3)
  • domain assumption RBEs in the outer blue wing of H-alpha are on-disk manifestations of type II spicules.
    The whole study treats RBE tracks as hot launch events; if this identification is wrong, the aftermath interpretation weakens. Cited in the Introduction and used throughout.
  • domain assumption H-alpha extinction is set by the n=2 population with strong temperature dependence and nonequilibrium overopacity in cooling gas, as in the simulations of Carlsson & Stein (2002) and Leenaarts et al. (2007).
    The interpretation that cooling ionized gas produces dark H-alpha fibrils relies on these published simulation results; this paper does not verify them for the observed events.
  • domain assumption The temporal correlation between darkest wing and darkest core pixels reflects causal links rather than spatial co-location of recurrent independent features.
    The delay histograms in Fig. 14 and the resolution test in Fig. 7 support it, but no explicit null hypothesis is tested. This is the weakest premise in the causal chain.

how reviews work

0 comments
Cite this review

Pith. "Pith review of Solar H-alpha features with hot onsets. IV. Network fibrils." pith.science (2026). https://pith.science/paper/W7PWFHDE

@misc{pith2026190809315,
  author       = {Pith},
  title        = {Pith review of: Solar H-alpha features with hot onsets. IV. Network fibrils},
  year         = {2026},
  howpublished = {\url{https://pith.science/paper/W7PWFHDE}},
  note         = {Machine review of arXiv:1908.09315}
}
read the original abstract

Even in quiet areas underneath coronal holes the solar chromosphere contains ubiquitous heating events. They tend to be small scale and short lived, hence difficult to identify. Here we do not address their much-debated contribution to outer-atmosphere heating, but their aftermaths. We performed a statistical analysis of high-resolution observations in the Balmer H-alpha line to suggest that many slender dark H-alpha fibrils spreading out from network represent cooling gas that outlines tracks of preceding rapid type II spicule events or smaller similar but as yet unresolved heating agents in which the main gas constituent, hydrogen, ionizes at least partially. Subsequent recombination then causes dark H-alpha fibrils enhanced by nonequilibrium overopacity. We suggest that the extraordinary fibrilar appearance of the H-alpha chromosphere around network results from intermittent, frequent small-scale prior heating.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 1908.09315 by the authors.

Figure 1
Figure 1. Full-field overviews for data A (upper row) and data B (lower row). First column: Hα blue-wing intensity at ∆λ=−0.8 Å. Second column: Hα line-center intensity 4 min later. Third column: Hα red-core intensity at ∆λ=+0.4 Å about 6 min after the first column. Each panel is bytescaled independently. The data A images start at the best-seeing moment. The data B images sample the Pub B PHE, contrail fiber, and return afte… view at source ↗
Figure 2
Figure 2. Seeing quality for data A (upper row) and data B (lower row). First column: root mean square contrast variation against time for the wide-band Hα image sequences. The rms units are arbitrary per data set. The solid horizontal lines show thresholds for discarding the worst images (25% for data A, 33% for data B). The dashed lines show the mean rms for the remaining images. Other panels: corresponding image center cut… view at source ↗
Figure 3
Figure 3. Example sequences of RBEs and their aftermaths from data A in the form of Hα image cutouts. The images can be zoomed in per pdf viewer and the online movie versions can be inspected and enlarged. The ∆λ and ∆t values are specified at the top of each panel, the time steps (it) and seeing quality (rms) are at the bottom. Rows: seven cases a−g in time order. First column: RBE skeleton taken from Pub A (white) overlaid … view at source ↗
Figures from the paper (11 more)
Figure 4
Figure 4. Figure 4: Stacked Hα image cutouts for data A. Before addition, all seeing-passed image cutouts are centered on the center of the RBE skeleton (plus) and rotated to point the skeleton to the right, away from the network to the left. Rows: averaged Hα samplings at ∆λ = −0.8, 0.0 …
Figure 5
Figure 5. Figure 5: Strous-format scatter analysis for data B. Images: Simultaneous blue- and red-wing images at ∆λ =±0.8 Å at the best-seeing moment (highest square in the lower graph of [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p008_5.png]
Figure 6
Figure 6. Figure 6: initiates our time-delay scatter analysis by employing it to the six images in [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p008_6.png]
Figure 7
Figure 7. Figure 7: Time-delay scatter analysis at good and poor resolution in data B. First row: images in the blue wing of Hα at ∆λ=−0.8 Å. Second row: images at Hα line-center taken 4 min later. Third row: scatter diagrams for each image pair above with the same axes as in Figs. 6 and …
Figure 8
Figure 8. Figure 8: Full-sequence time-delay scatter analysis for data A (upper two rows) and data B (lower two rows). In each pair the upper row shows the pixel-by-pixel correlation for Hα line-center intensity before or after the Hα blue wing intensity at ∆λ =−0.8 Å. The lower row per p…
Figure 9
Figure 9. Figure 9: Time-delay scatter analysis for the darkest RBE moments in data A (left two columns) and data B (right two columns). First row: Hα images at ∆λ=−0.8 Å constructed by selecting the darkest value for each pixel throughout the entire observation duration. The first pair o…
Figure 11
Figure 11. Figure 11: Figures 9 and 10 tested whether darkest core pixels follow on darkest blue-wing pixels. We now reverse this question into asking instead to what extent any darkest core pixels relate to preceding RBEs. We also add red-wing RREs to this question. The identical images i…
Figure 12
Figure 12. Figure 12: Sequence-wide dark-dark comparisons for data A (upper row) and data B (lower row) network only. First column: darkest value per network pixel during the whole sequence at ∆λ =−0.8 Å. The lower image is the same as the third image in [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_…
Figure 14
Figure 14. Figure 14: Histograms of sampling delays for data A (left) and data B (right). The latter cover a twice longer delay range than shown here. Upper row: delays corresponding to the image pairs in [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p014_14.png]
Figure 15
Figure 15. Figure 15: compares temporal means over the entire image se￾quences except for poor-seeing moments. In this averaging specific pixel-intensity combinations build up signature when they are persistent or repeat in place, not when they appear briefly only once or appear at a rando…
Figure 16
Figure 16. Figure 16: Full-sequence scatter analysis for data A (upper row) and data B lower row). Format as in [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p016_16.png]

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

33 extracted references · 33 canonical work pages

  1. [1]

    Antolin, P., Schmit, D., Pereira, T. M. D., De Pontieu, B., & De Moortel, I. 2018, ApJ, 856, 44 ADS

    work page 2018

  2. [2]

    Avrett, E. H. & Loeser, R. 2008, ApJS, 175, 229 ADS

    work page 2008

  3. [3]

    Bray, R. J. & Loughhead, R. E. 1974, The solar chromosphere, ed. R. J. Bray & R. E. Loughhead ADS

    work page 1974

  4. [4]

    H., Gudiksen, B

    Carlsson, M., Hansteen, V . H., Gudiksen, B. V ., Leenaarts, J., & De Pontieu, B. 2016, A&A, 585, A4 ADS

    work page 2016

  5. [5]

    & Stein, R

    Carlsson, M. & Stein, R. F. 1997, ApJ, 481, 500 ADS

    work page 1997

  6. [6]

    & Stein, R

    Carlsson, M. & Stein, R. F. 2002, ApJ, 572, 626 ADS

    work page 2002

  7. [7]

    2018, ApJ, 857, 73 ADS De Pontieu, B., De Moortel, I., Martínez-Sykora, J., & McIntosh, S

    Chintzoglou, G., De Pontieu, B., Martínez-Sykora, J., et al. 2018, ApJ, 857, 73 ADS De Pontieu, B., De Moortel, I., Martínez-Sykora, J., & McIntosh, S. W. 2017, ApJL, 845, L18 ADS De Pontieu, B., Hansteen, V . H., Rouppe van der V oort, L., van Noort, M., &

    work page 2018

  8. [8]

    2007a, ApJ, 655, 624 ADS De Pontieu, B., McIntosh, S., Hansteen, V

    Carlsson, M. 2007a, ApJ, 655, 624 ADS De Pontieu, B., McIntosh, S., Hansteen, V . H., et al. 2007b, PASJ, 59, S655 ADS De Pontieu, B., McIntosh, S. W., Carlsson, M., et al. 2011, Science, 331, 55 ADS

    work page 2011

Show all 33 references
  1. [9]

    2006, ApJL, 647, L73 ADS

    Carlsson, M. 2006, ApJL, 647, L73 ADS

    2006

  2. [10]

    Henriques, V . M. J., Kuridze, D., Mathioudakis, M., & Keenan, F. P. 2016, ApJ, 820, 124 ADS

    2016

  3. [11]

    J., Solanki, S

    Jafarzadeh, S., Rutten, R. J., Solanki, S. K., et al. 2017, ApJS, 229, 11 ADS Jefferies, J. T. & Thomas, R. N. 1959, ApJ, 129, 401 ADS Langangen, Ø., De Pontieu, B., Carlsson, M., et al. 2008, ApJL, 679, L167 ADS

    2017

  4. [12]

    Leenaarts, J., Carlsson, M., Hansteen, V ., & Rutten, R. J. 2007, A&A, 473, 625 ADS

    2007

  5. [13]

    2012, ApJ, 749, 136 ADS

    Leenaarts, J., Carlsson, M., & Rouppe van der V oort, L. 2012, ApJ, 749, 136 ADS

    2012

  6. [14]

    2015, ApJ, 802, 136 ADS

    Leenaarts, J., Carlsson, M., & Rouppe van der V oort, L. 2015, ApJ, 802, 136 ADS

    2015

  7. [15]

    J., Reardon, K., Carlsson, M., & Hansteen, V

    Leenaarts, J., Rutten, R. J., Reardon, K., Carlsson, M., & Hansteen, V . 2010, ApJ, 709, 1362 ADS

    2010

  8. [16]

    J., Sütterlin, P., Carlsson, M., & Uitenbroek, H

    Leenaarts, J., Rutten, R. J., Sütterlin, P., Carlsson, M., & Uitenbroek, H. 2006, A&A, 449, 1209 ADS

    2006

  9. [17]

    Lockyer, J. N. 1868, Proceedings of the Royal Society of London Series I, 17, 131 ADS Martínez-Sykora, J., De Pontieu, B., De Moortel, I., Hansteen, V . H., & Carlsson, M. 2018, ApJ, 860, 116 ADS

    2018

  10. [18]

    Pereira, T. M. D. 2019, Advances in Space Research, 63, 1434 ADS

    2019

  11. [19]

    Pietarila, A., Hirzberger, J., Zakharov, V ., & Solanki, S. K. 2009, A&A, 502, 647 ADS Rouppe van der V oort, L., Leenaarts, J., De Pontieu, B., Carlsson, M., & Vissers, G. 2009, ApJ, 705, 272 ADS (Pub A) Rouppe van der V oort, L. H. M., De Pontieu, B., Hansteen, V . H., Carls...

    2009

  12. [20]

    Rutten, R. J. 2006, in Astron. Soc. Pacific Conf. Series, V ol. 354, Solar MHD Theory and Observations: A High Spatial Resolution Perspective, ed. J. Leibacher, R. F. Stein, & H. Uitenbroek, 276 ADS

    2006

  13. [21]

    Rutten, R. J. 2016, A&A, 590, A124 ADS

    2016

  14. [22]

    Rutten, R. J. & Rouppe van der V oort, L. H. M. 2017, A&A, 597, A138 ADS (Pub B)

    2017

  15. [23]

    Rutten, R. J. & Uitenbroek, H. 1991, SoPh, 134, 15 ADS

    1991

  16. [24]

    Rutten, R. J. & Uitenbroek, H. 2012, A&A, 540, A86 ADS

    2012

  17. [25]

    B., Bjelksjo, K., Korhonen, T

    Scharmer, G. B., Bjelksjo, K., Korhonen, T. K., Lindberg, B., & Petterson, B. 2003, in Proc. SPIE, V ol. 4853, Innovative Telescopes and Instrumentation for Solar Astrophysics, ed. S. L. Keil & S. V . Avakyan, 341–350 ADS

    2003

  18. [26]

    B., Narayan, G., Hillberg, T., et al

    Scharmer, G. B., Narayan, G., Hillberg, T., et al. 2008, ApJL, 689, L69 ADS

    2008

  19. [27]

    Schoolman, S. A. 1972, SoPh, 22, 344 ADS

    1972

  20. [28]

    H., Rouppe van der V oort, L., & De Pontieu, B

    Sekse, D. H., Rouppe van der V oort, L., & De Pontieu, B. 2012, ApJ, 752, 108 ADS

    2012

  21. [29]

    2016, ApJ, 817, 124 ADS

    Skogsrud, H., Rouppe van der V oort, L., & De Pontieu, B. 2016, ApJ, 817, 124 ADS

    2016

  22. [30]

    Strous, L. H. 1994, PhD thesis, PhD Thesis, Utrecht University, (1994) ADS

    1994

  23. [31]

    Thomas, R. N. 1957, ApJ, 125, 260 ADS

    1957

  24. [32]

    & Rouppe van der V oort, L

    Vissers, G. & Rouppe van der V oort, L. 2012, ApJ, 750, 22 ADS

    2012

  25. [33]

    2013, ApJ, 767, 17 ADS Article number, page 19 of 19

    Yurchyshyn, V ., Abramenko, V ., & Goode, P. 2013, ApJ, 767, 17 ADS Article number, page 19 of 19

    2013

Pith tools

Reviewed August 14, 2026 · model on record in the stance chip above.