Pith. sign in

REVIEW 3 major objections 4 minor 60 references

Well-posedness and large deviations for 2-D Stochastic Navier-Stokes equations with jumps

T0 review · 3 major / 4 minor · reviewed 2026-08-14 · deepseek-v4-flash

Challenge this review Re-run · record.json Download PDF Read on arXiv ↗ Review JSON

Pith's one-line read This paper proves that 2-D stochastic Navier–Stokes equations with multiplicative Lévy noise have unique global strong solutions under natural Lipschitz and linear-growth assumptions, and satisfy a Freidlin–Wentzell large deviation…

desk verdict The well-posedness half is credible and useful; the LDP half has a load-bearing gap: Assumption 3.1 is too weak for the uniform estimate (B.2), so Theorem 3.1 is not established as stated. read the letter →

arxiv 1908.06228 v3 pith:WB4ZMVKO submitted 2019-08-17 math.PR

Zdzislaw Brzezniak , Xuhui Peng , Jianliang Zhai This is my paper · ORCID
classification math.PR MSC 60H1560F1076D0676M35
keywords 2-DstochasticNavier-StokesequationsLévyprocessesmultiplicativejumpnoisePoissonrandommeasureGirsanovtheoremFreidlin-Wentzelllargedeviationprinciplestrongsolutionsweakconvergencemethod
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal

The pith

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The reading

The paper establishes three things for the 2-D stochastic Navier–Stokes equations driven by multiplicative Lévy noise: global strong well-posedness for both $H$-valued and $V$-valued initial data under the classical Lipschitz and linear-growth assumptions on the jump coefficient; a rigorous Girsanov theorem for Poisson random measures; and a Freidlin–Wentzell large deviation principle for the PDE-strong solutions. The large deviation statement says that as the small-noise parameter $\varepsilon$ goes to zero, the probability that the solution stays near a given path $k$ decays exponentially, and the exponent is the infimum of the relative entropy $L_T(g)$ over controls $g$ whose deterministic controlled Navier–Stokes solution equals $k$. A reader should care because jump noise is the natural model for abrupt, unpredictable events in fluid systems, and previous well-posedness results for this setting required extra conditions on the small jumps or higher integrability of the coefficient, while previous large deviation results were for probabilistically strong solutions rather than PDE-strong solutions. The proof removes those extra assumptions by combining a cut-off of the nonlinearity with a fixed-point argument and by supplying a self-contained Girsanov argument for the Poissonian control problem.

What carries the argument

The proof is carried by three interlocking pieces. First, the nonlinear term is truncated by a smooth cut-off function $\theta_m(\|y\|_{\Upsilon_t})$ and further localized with $\varphi_\delta$; this makes the auxiliary deterministic PDE uniformly coercive, so Picard iteration and the Banach fixed-point theorem give a unique solution for each stochastic forcing path, and the cut-off is later removed by stopping times and a priori estimates. Second, a Girsanov-type theorem for Poisson random measures, with density $M^\varepsilon_T(\psi)$ built from the control $\phi$, guarantees that under an equivalent probability measure the controlled process has the same law as the original noise-driven process; Lemma 4.3 uses this to identify the controlled SPDE's solution. Third, the weak-convergence criterion reduces the large deviation principle to two claims: continuity of the deterministic map $g\mapsto u^g$ on $S_N$, and convergence in law of controlled stochastic solutions to $G^0(\phi)$. The exponential-integrability class $H$ for the size functions $L_i$ is what makes the estimates uniform over the relative-entropy balls $S_N$.

What would settle it

A concrete check: let $Z=(0,1)$, $\nu(dz)=dz$, $L_i(z)=-\log z$, and $G(u,z)=L_1(z)u$, so that $\int_Z L_i^2\,d\nu<\infty$ but $\int_Z e^{\delta L_i^2}\,d\nu=\infty$ for all $\delta>0$. For this coefficient, compute whether the family $\{u^\varepsilon\}$ satisfies the large deviation principle with the rate function $I$ of Theorem 3.1: if it does, Assumption 3.1 is not necessary; if the Laplace upper or lower bound fails, the exponential-integrability condition is genuinely load-bearing.

Watch

Extended reading notes

Core claim

The central claim is Theorem 3.1: under Assumption 3.1, for every $f\in L^2([0,T];H)$ and $u_0\in V$, the family of strong solutions $\{u^\varepsilon\}_{\varepsilon>0}$ satisfies a large deviation principle on $\Upsilon_T^V=D([0,T],V)\cap L^2([0,T],D(A))$ with the good rate function $I(k)=\inf\{L_T(g): g\in S,\ u^g=k\}$, where $S$ is the union over $N$ of relative-entropy balls $S_N=\{g:L_T(g)\le N\}$, $L_T(g)=\int_0^T\int_Z(g\log g-g+1)\,d\nu\,dt$, and $u^g$ is the unique solution of the deterministic controlled equation $\frac{d}{dt}u^g+Au^g+B(u^g)=f+\int_Z G(u^g,z)(g-1)\,\nu(dz)$, $u^g(0)=u_0$. Along the way the paper proves Theorems 2.1 and 2.2: global unique solutions in $D([0,\infty),H)\cap L^2_{\rm loc}([0,\infty),V)$ and in $D([0,\infty),V)\cap L^2_{\rm loc}([0,\infty),D(A))$ under only the Lipschitz and linear-growth conditions on the jump coefficient. The paper also states and proves a Girsanov-type theorem for Poisson random measures, which is the step that converts the control problem into the original noise law.

Load-bearing premise

The load-bearing extra premise for the large deviation theorem, beyond well-posedness, is that the jump coefficient's size functions belong to the class $H$, meaning $\int_\Gamma \exp(\delta L_i(z)^2)\,\nu(dz)<\infty$ for every finite-measure set $\Gamma$, since only square-integrability is enough for the well-posedness theorems but not for the uniform estimates over the relative-entropy balls.

Editorial extensions

If this is right

  • Under Assumption 3.1, the laws of $u^\varepsilon$ satisfy a large deviation principle on $\Upsilon_T^V$, so rare excursions from the deterministic Navier–Stokes flow are exponentially rare with a computable rate $I$.
  • The rate function is good: its sublevel sets are compact, and $I(k)=\infty$ when no admissible control drives the deterministic equation to $k$.
  • The zero-noise most likely path is the solution of the controlled equation (3.10) with the control $g$ minimizing $L_T(g)$.
  • The well-posedness theorems hold under only Lipschitz and linear growth of the jump coefficient; extra small-jump control and higher-moment assumptions are not needed for existence and uniqueness of global strong solutions.
  • The Girsanov theorem for Poisson random measures proved in Lemma 4.2 is a reusable rigorous step for weak-convergence proofs of large deviations for SPDEs driven by jumps.

Reading between the lines

Editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • An untested consequence is that the same cut-off and fixed-point mechanism, together with the Poisson Girsanov density, should remove the extra integrability assumptions in other dissipative SPDEs driven by Lévy noise, for example quasi-geostrophic or Landau–Lifshitz equations.
  • The gap between square-integrability for well-posedness and exponential integrability for the LDP suggests a boundary regime: a jump coefficient like $G(u,z)=(-\log z)u$ on $Z=(0,1)$ with $\nu(dz)=dz$ satisfies the well-posedness assumptions but not Assumption 3.1, and it is an open question whether the LDP still holds, perhaps with different scaling.
  • The rate function indicates a concrete importance-sampling scheme: replace the intensity $\nu(dz)dt$ by the tilted intensity $g(t,z)\nu(dz)dt$ with $g$ minimizing $L_T$; this could be tested numerically on a discretized 2D Navier–Stokes model to estimate rare-event probabilities.
  • Because the LDP holds in the joint space $D([0,T],V)\cap L^2([0,T],D(A))$, it should imply Laplace principles for continuous functionals of the solution such as enstrophy or dissipation, which is a stronger statement than an LDP in weaker path topologies.
Share X Bluesky LinkedIn Reddit HN

Signed reviews

No signed human review yet.

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, and a circularity audit.

Referee Report

3 major / 4 minor

Summary. The paper studies the 2D stochastic Navier-Stokes equations driven by multiplicative Lévy noise. It proves existence and uniqueness of global strong solutions in both the probabilistic and PDE senses under Lipschitz and linear growth assumptions on the jump coefficient (Theorems 2.1 and 2.2), proves a Girsanov-type theorem for Poisson random measures, and uses the weak-convergence framework of [19,18] to establish a Freidlin-Wentzell large deviation principle on the space Υ_V_T = D([0,T],V) ∩ L^2([0,T],D(A)) (Theorem 3.1). The rate function is defined through a deterministic skeleton equation (3.10).

Significance. If the main results hold, the paper would improve on prior work by treating strong solutions in the PDE sense for the 2D Navier-Stokes equations with jumps, and it would provide a rigorous and self-contained proof of the Poisson Girsanov transformation needed for the weak-convergence approach. The fixed-point constructions and the a priori estimates in Sections 2 and 4 are extensive and mostly carefully organized. However, the central LDP theorem depends on the uniform estimate (B.2), and that estimate is not justified under the stated Assumption 3.1: the local exponential integrability condition defining the class H is strictly weaker than the global exponential integrability required by Lemma 3.4 of [19]. A concrete counterexample shows that (B.2) can fail under Assumption 3.1, and in that case the skeleton equation (3.10) may not be well-posed for some g ∈ S_N. Since Lemma 3.1, Proposition 3.3, and Proposition 4.1 all rely on this estimate, Theorem 3.1 is not established as stated. The gap appears repairable by strengthening the assumption on L_i to a global exponential integrability condition.

major comments (3)
  1. [Section 3.1 and Appendix B, Eq. (B.2)] Assumption 3.1 only requires L_i ∈ H, i.e. ∫_Γ exp(δL_i^2(z))ν(dz) < ∞ for every ν-finite set Γ. Under a σ-finite ν this is a purely local condition. The paper then invokes Lemma 3.4 of [19] to assert (B.2), namely that sup_{g∈S_N} ∫_0^T ∫_Z L_i(z)|g(t,z)-1|ν(dz)dt < ∞ for i=1,2,3. Lemma 3.4 of [19] requires a global exponential integrability condition such as ∫_Z exp(θρ(z)^2)ν(dz)<∞ for some θ>0. Local H-integrability does not imply this. For example, take Z=N, ν({n})=n^{-2}, and L(n)=n^{1/4}; then L∈L^2(ν) and L∈H, but ∑_n exp(δ n^{1/2})/n^2 = ∞ for every δ>0. Thus (B.2) cannot be derived from Assumption 3.1.
  2. [Lemma 3.1 / equation (3.10)] Because (B.2) is used at the start of the proof of Lemma 3.1 to ensure that the drift F(t,y)=∫_Z G(y,z)(g(t,z)-1)ν(dz) is integrable and locally Lipschitz, the claimed well-posedness of the skeleton equation for every g∈S_N is not established under Assumption 3.1. The failure is not merely technical: with G(y,z)=L(z)y, u0≠0, and the function g constructed in the previous counterexample (g(t,n_k)=2^{7k/4} on n_k=2^k and g=1 elsewhere), one has g∈S_N but ∫_0^T∫_Z L(z)|g(t,z)-1|ν(dz)dt=∞, so the right-hand side of (3.10) is infinite and no finite solution can exist. Lemma 3.1 should either be proved under the stated hypothesis or Assumption 3.1 should be strengthened to a global exponential integrability condition for L_i.
  3. [Propositions 3.3 and 4.1] Proposition 3.3, which verifies Claim-LDP-1, uses (B.2) at several essential points: in the estimates (3.24), (3.26), (3.28), and (3.32), and in the final Gronwall step. Lemma 4.4 and Lemma 4.5 similarly use (B.2) to control the stochastic and drift terms of the controlled equation (4.34). Therefore Claim-LDP-2 is also not justified as written. The whole weak-convergence argument for Theorem 3.1 collapses unless (B.2) is replaced by a valid estimate; a global exponential integrability assumption on L_i would restore it.
minor comments (4)
  1. [Abstract and Section 2] The abstract says the paper works under 'local Lipschitz and one-sided linear growth assumptions', but Theorems 2.1 and 2.2 are stated under global Lipschitz and linear growth conditions, namely (G-H1), (G-H2) and (G-V1), (G-V2). The wording should be aligned with the actual assumptions.
  2. [Section 2.2, equation (2.94)] In the Itô estimate for the proof of Theorem 2.2, the decomposition writes a sum over five terms J_i(t), but only J_2 through J_5 are defined; J_1 appears to be the initial condition term. Please correct the indexing.
  3. [Section 3.1, proof of Theorem 3.1] The proof invokes [55, Theorem 8] to obtain the measurable maps G^ε. It would help the reader if the hypotheses of that theorem were checked explicitly against the present setting, since the entire weak-convergence argument depends on this measurable-selection step.
  4. [Throughout] There are several typos and small notational slips, e.g. 'uniqueness element' in the proof of Theorem 2.2, the inconsistent notation U^N versus U_N around (3.18) and Section 4.2, and the unnumbered display '5∑_{i=1}' in (2.94). A careful proofreading pass is needed.

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged · score 0.0 of 10

No significant circularity: the LDP is derived from the external Budhiraja-Dupuis-Maroulas weak-convergence framework applied to a solved skeleton equation and a Girsanov theorem proved in the paper, not from the paper's own assumptions by construction.

full rationale

Theorem 3.1 is not obtained by fitting or by a definitional identity. The rate function is the standard inf-over-controls contraction form; the skeleton equation (3.10) is solved in Lemma 3.1 and Appendix B using the Lipschitz/linear growth assumptions plus the external entropy bound (B.2) attributed to Lemma 3.4 of [19], and the controlled SPDE (4.34) is linked to the original equation via a Girsanov-type theorem (Lemma 4.2) proved inside the paper. The reduction to the measurable map G_epsilon uses the external Yamada-Watanabe result [55, Theorem 8], and the LDP criteria are the external weak-convergence results of [18,19]; none of these presuppose the LDP conclusion. Self-citations do appear, notably in delegating uniqueness in Theorem 2.1 to [13] or [12] and in quoting the uniform estimate (3.25) also from [56] and [54], but these are citations to prior published results and techniques rather than restatements of the present paper's outputs, and the same estimate is independently attributed to the non-overlapping source [19]. The skeptic's concern that Assumption 3.1's local exponential integrability may be insufficient for the global entropy bounds (B.2) is a potential correctness or rigor gap in the proof, not a circular dependency: it does not make any claimed prediction equivalent to an input by construction. There are no fitted parameters, no self-defined rate function that simply renames the assumptions, and no load-bearing chain in which the paper's own derived claims are used to prove themselves.

Assumptions & free parameters 0 free parameters · 7 assumptions · 0 invented entities

The central claim adds no new free parameters or entities. The load-bearing background is standard SPDE analysis; the only assumption tailored to this paper is the exponential integrability of the Lipschitz functions in Assumption 3.1, which is stronger than the L^2 conditions used for well-posedness.

assumptions (7)
  • standard math Stokes operator A on bounded smooth domain D has compact resolvent and eigenbasis; Gelfand triple V subset H subset V' holds.
    Section 2 setup; standard functional analytic framework for 2D Navier-Stokes on bounded smooth domains.
  • standard math Standard 2D Navier-Stokes bilinear estimates, Lemma 2.1 from Temam [50].
    Used throughout the fixed point estimates in Lemmas 2.2 through 2.5 and in Proposition 3.3.
  • standard math Ito formula for Hilbert-space SPDEs with compensated Poisson random measures, cited to [33] and [12].
    Used in the proofs of Lemmas 2.3, 2.5, 4.4, 4.5, and 4.8.
  • standard math Burkholder-Davis-Gundy inequalities for Poisson stochastic integrals, cited to Theorem 23.12 in [38].
    Used to control martingale terms in the well-posedness and tightness estimates.
  • standard math Yamada-Watanabe theorem for stochastic evolution equations driven by Poisson random measure, cited to [55, Theorem 8].
    Provides the measurable map G^epsilon used to define u^epsilon and the control process X^epsilon in Section 4.
  • standard math Weak convergence LDP criterion and compactness lemmas for Poisson-driven SPDEs from [19, Theorem 2.4, Lemmas 3.4 and 3.11].
    Framework for verifying the LDP via Claims LDP-1 and LDP-2.
  • ad hoc to paper Exponential integrability condition L_i in H from Assumption 3.1, i.e., for every nu-finite set Gamma the integral over Gamma of exp(delta h^2(z)) with respect to nu(dz) is finite.
    Imposed specifically for the large deviation estimates; not needed for Theorems 2.1 and 2.2 and stronger than L^2(nu).

how reviews work

0 comments
Cite this review

Pith. "Pith review of Well-posedness and large deviations for 2-D Stochastic Navier-Stokes equations with jumps." pith.science (2026). https://pith.science/paper/WB4ZMVKO

@misc{pith2026190806228,
  author       = {Pith},
  title        = {Pith review of: Well-posedness and large deviations for 2-D Stochastic Navier-Stokes equations with jumps},
  year         = {2026},
  howpublished = {\url{https://pith.science/paper/WB4ZMVKO}},
  note         = {Machine review of arXiv:1908.06228}
}
abstract

The aim of this paper is threefold. Firstly, we prove the existence and the uniqueness of a global strong (in both the probabilistic and the PDE senses) $\mathrm{H}^{1}_2$-valued solution to the 2D stochastic Navier-Stokes equations (SNSEs) driven by a multiplicative L\'evy noise under the natural Lipschitz on balls and linear growth assumptions on the jump coefficient. Secondly, we prove a Girsanov-type theorem for Poisson random measures and apply this result to a study of the well-posedness of the corresponding stochastic controlled problem for these SNSEs. Thirdly, we apply these results to establish a Freidlin-Wentzell-type large deviation principle for the solutions of these SNSEs by employing the weak convergence method introduced in papers [16][18].

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

60 extracted references · 60 canonical work pages

  1. [19]

    Budhiraja, J

    A. Budhiraja, J. Chen and P.Dupuis, Large Deviations for Stochastic Partial Differential Equations Driven by a Poisson Random Measure, Stoch. Process. Appl. 123 (2013) 523- 560

    work page 2013

  2. [1]

    de Acosta, A general non-convex large deviation result with a pplications to stochastic equations, Probab

    A. de Acosta, A general non-convex large deviation result with a pplications to stochastic equations, Probab. Theory Relat. Fields, (2000), 483-521

    work page 2000

  3. [2]

    de Acosta, Large deviations for vector valued L´ evy proces ses, Stoch

    A. de Acosta, Large deviations for vector valued L´ evy proces ses, Stoch. Process. Appl., 51 (1994), 75-115

    work page 1994

  4. [3]

    Bao and C

    J. Bao and C. Yuan, Large deviations for neutral functional SD Es with jumps, Stochas- tics, 87 (2015), 48-70

    work page 2015

  5. [4]

    Barczy, Z

    M. Barczy, Z. Li and G. Pap, Yamada-Watanabe Results for Sto chastic Differential Equations with Jumps. Int. J. Stoch. Anal. 28, (2015), Art. ID 460472, 23 pp

    work page 2015

  6. [5]

    Basse-O’Connor and J

    A. Basse-O’Connor and J. Rosi´ nski, On the uniform convergen ce of random series in Skorohod space and representations of c` adl` ag infinitely divisible processes. Ann. Probab. 41 (2013), 4317-4341

    work page 2013

  7. [6]

    Bensoussan and R

    A. Bensoussan and R. Temam, Equations stochastiques du type Navier-Stokes, J. Funct. Anal. 13, (1973), 195-222

    work page 1973

  8. [7]

    Bessaih, E

    H. Bessaih, E. Hausenblas and P.A. Razafimandimby, Strong solut ions to stochastic hydrodynamical systems with multiplicative noise of jump type. Nonlinear Differ. Equ. Appl. NoDEA 22, (2015), 1661-1697

    work page 2015

Show all 60 references
  1. [8]

    Bichteler, Stochastic Integration with Jumps

    K. Bichteler, Stochastic Integration with Jumps. Encyclopedia o f Mathematics and Its Applications 89. Cambridge Univ. Press, Cambridge, 2002

    2002

  2. [9]

    Brze´ zniak and S

    Z. Brze´ zniak and S. Cerrai Large deviations principle for the invariant measures of th e 2D stochastic Navier-Stokes equations on a torus , J. Funct. Anal. 273, no. 6, 1891–1930 (2017)

    2017

  3. [10]

    Brze´ zniak, B

    Z. Brze´ zniak, B. Goldys, P. Imkeller, S. Peszat, E. Priola and J . Zabczyk: Time irreg- ularity of generalized Ornstein-Uhlenbeck processes. C. R. Acad. Sci. Paris Ser. I 348, 273-276 (2010)

    2010

  4. [11]

    Brze´ zniak, E

    Z. Brze´ zniak, E. Hausenblas and P.A. Razafimandimby, Stochastic Reaction-diffusion Equations Driven by Jump Processes, Potential Anal. 49, no. 1, 131-201 (2018)

    2018

  5. [12]

    Brze´ zniak, E

    Z. Brze´ zniak, E. Hausenblas and J. Zhu, 2-D stochastic Navier-Stokes equations driven by jump noise. Nonlinear Anal. 79, (2013), 122-139. 77

    2013

  6. [13]

    Brze´ zniak, W

    Z. Brze´ zniak, W. Liu and J. Zhu, Strong solutions for SPDE with locally monotone coefficients driven by L´ evy noise.Nonlinear Anal. Real World Appl. 17, (2014), 283-310

    2014

  7. [14]

    Brze´ zniak, U

    Z. Brze´ zniak, U. Manna and J. Zhai,Large Deviations for a Stochastic Landau-Lifshitz- Gilbert Equation Driven by Pure Jump Noise , in preparation

  8. [15]

    Brze´ zniak and A

    Z. Brze´ zniak and A. Millet, On the stochastic strichartz estima tes and the stochastic nonlinear Schr¨ odinger equation on a compact riemannian manifold.Potential Anal., 41, (2014), 269-315

    2014

  9. [16]

    Brze´ zniak and E

    Z. Brze´ zniak and E. Motyl,Existence of martingale solutions of the stochastic Navier - Stokes equations in unbounded 2D and 3D-domains , J. Differential Equations, 254, 1627- 1685 (2013)

    2013

  10. [17]

    Brze´ zniak, M

    Z. Brze´ zniak, M. Ondrej´ at and J. Zhai,Poisson random measure and its applications to LDP , working title, in preparation

  11. [18]

    Budhiraja, P.Dupuis and V

    A. Budhiraja, P.Dupuis and V. Maroulas, Variational represent ations for continuous time processes, Annales de l’Institut Henri Poincar´ e(B) Probabilit´ es Statistiques 47(3) (2011) 725-747

    2011

  12. [20]

    Chueshov and A

    I. Chueshov and A. Millet, Stochastic 2-D Hydrodynamics Type S ystems: Well Posed- ness and Large Deviations. Appl. Math. Optim. 61(2010) 379–420

    2010

  13. [21]

    Da Prato and J

    G. Da Prato and J. Zabczyk, Stochastic Equations in Infinite Dim ensions, Cambridge Univ. Press, 1992

    1992

  14. [22]

    de Bouard and A

    A. de Bouard and A. Debussche, A stochastic nonlinear Schr¨ o dinger equation with multiplicative noise, Commun. Math. Phys. , 205, (1999), 161-181

    1999

  15. [23]

    Debussche, The stochastic nonlinear Schr ¨ odinger equation inH 1, Stoch

    A., de Bouard and A. Debussche, The stochastic nonlinear Schr ¨ odinger equation inH 1, Stoch. Anal. Appl. , 21, (2003), 97-126

    2003

  16. [24]

    Dong and Y

    Z. Dong and Y. Xie, Global solutions of stochastic 2-D Navier-St okes equations with L´ evy noise.Science in China Series A: Mathematics 52, (2009), 1497-1524

    2009

  17. [25]

    Z. Dong, J. Xiong, J. Zhai and T. Zhang, A moderate deviation p rinciple for 2-D stochastic Navier-Stokes equations driven by multiplicative L´ evy noises. J. Funct. Anal. 272 (2017), 227-254

    2017

  18. [26]

    Dong and J

    Z. Dong and J. Zhai, Martingale solutions and Markov selection of stochastic 3D Navier- Stokes equations with jump. J. Differential Equations 250 (2011), 2737-2778

    2011

  19. [27]

    Doob, Stochastic Processes, John Wiley & Sons Inc., New Yo rk, 1953 78

    J.L. Doob, Stochastic Processes, John Wiley & Sons Inc., New Yo rk, 1953 78

    1953

  20. [28]

    Dupuis, R.S

    P. Dupuis, R.S. Ellis, A Weak Convergence Approach to the Theory of Large Deviations. Wiley, New York, 1997

    1997

  21. [29]

    Feng and T

    J. Feng and T. Kurtz, Large Deviations for Stochastic Processes, Math. Surveys Monogr. vol. 131, American Mathematical Society, Providence, RI, 2006

    2006

  22. [30]

    Fernando, E

    P. Fernando, E. Hausenblas and P. Razafimandimby, Irreducib ility and exponential mixing of some stochastic hydrodynamical systems driven by pure j ump noise. Comm. Math. Phys. 348, (2016), 535-565

    2016

  23. [31]

    Flandoli, Dissipativity and invariant measures for stochastic Navier-Stokes equations, Nonlinear Differential Equations Appl

    F. Flandoli, Dissipativity and invariant measures for stochastic Navier-Stokes equations, Nonlinear Differential Equations Appl. , 1, (1994), 403-426

    1994

  24. [32]

    Flandoli and D

    F. Flandoli and D. Gatarek, Martingale and stationary solutions for stochastic Navier- Stokes equations. Probab. Theory Relat. Fields 102, (1995), 367-391

    1995

  25. [33]

    Gy¨ ongy and N

    I. Gy¨ ongy and N. V. Krylov, On stochastics equations with respect to semimartingales. II. Itˆ o formula in Banach spaces. Stochastics 6, no. 3-4, 153-173 (1981/82)

    1981

  26. [34]

    Hairer and J.C

    M. Hairer and J.C. Mattingly, Ergodicity of the 2-D Navier-Stoke s equation with de- generate stochastic forcing, Ann. of Math. , 164, (2006), 993-1032

    2006

  27. [35]

    Ikeda and S

    N. Ikeda and S. Watanabe, Stochastic Differential Equations a nd Diffusion Processes, North-Holland Publishing Co., Amsterdam, 1981

    1981

  28. [36]

    Iscoe, M.B

    I. Iscoe, M.B. Marcus, D. McDonald, M. Talagrand and J. Zinn, C ontinuity ofl2-valued Ornstein-Uhlenbeck processes, Ann. Probab. 18 (1990) 68-84

    1990

  29. [37]

    Jacod and A.N

    J. Jacod and A.N. Shiryaev, Limit Theorems for Stochastic Processes , Springer-Verlag, 1987

    1987

  30. [38]

    Kallenberg, Foundations of Modern Probability , Springer-Verlag, 1997

    O. Kallenberg, Foundations of Modern Probability , Springer-Verlag, 1997

    1997

  31. [39]

    Liu and M

    W. Liu and M. R¨ ockner, SPDE in Hilbert space with locally monotone efficients, J. Funct. Anal., 11, (2010), 2902-2922

    2010

  32. [40]

    Liu and J.L

    Y. Liu and J.L. Zhai, A note on time regularity of generalized Ornst ein-Uhlenbeck processes with cylindrical stable noise. C. R. Acad. Sci. Paris Ser. I 350, (2012), 97-100

    2012

  33. [41]

    Liu and J.L

    Y. Liu and J.L. Zhai, Time Regularity of Generalized Ornstein-Uhlen beck Processes with Lvy Noises in Hilbert Spaces, J. Theor. Probab. , (2016), 843-866

    2016

  34. [42]

    Priola and J

    E. Priola and J. Zabczyk, Structural properties of semilinear S PDEs driven by cylin- drical stable process, Probab. Theory Relat. Fields 149 (2011) 97-137

    2011

  35. [43]

    Mikulevicius and B.L

    R. Mikulevicius and B.L. Rozovskii, Global L2-solutions of stochastic Navier-Stokes equations, Ann. Probab., 33 (1) (2005), 137-176. 79

    2005

  36. [44]

    Motyl, Stochastic hydrodynamic-type evolution equations driven by L´ evy noise in 3D unbounded domains - abstract framework and applications, Stoch

    E. Motyl, Stochastic hydrodynamic-type evolution equations driven by L´ evy noise in 3D unbounded domains - abstract framework and applications, Stoch. Process. Appl. 124, (2014), 2052-2097

    2014

  37. [45]

    Peszat, J

    S. Peszat, J. Zabczyk, Time regularity of solutions to linear equ ations with Levy noise in infinite dimensions. Stoch. Process. Appl. 123, (2013), 719-751

    2013

  38. [46]

    Priola, J

    E. Priola, J. Zabczyk, Structural properties of semilinear SPD Es driven by cylindrical stable process. Probab. Theory Relat. Fields 149,(2011), 97-137

    2011

  39. [47]

    R¨ ockner and T, Zhang, Stochastic evolution equations of j ump type: existence, uniqueness and large deviation principles, Potential Anal., 26, (2007), 255-279

    M. R¨ ockner and T, Zhang, Stochastic evolution equations of j ump type: existence, uniqueness and large deviation principles, Potential Anal., 26, (2007), 255-279

    2007

  40. [48]

    Sritharan and P

    S.S. Sritharan and P. Sundar, Large deviation for the two dimen sional Navier-Stokes equations with multiplicative noise, Stoch. Process. Appl. 116, (2006), 1636-1659

    2006

  41. [49]

    Swi¸ ech and J

    A. Swi¸ ech and J. Zabczyk, Large deviations for stochastic PD E with L´ evy noise, J. Funct. Anal., 260, (2011), 674-723

    2011

  42. [50]

    Temam, Navier-Stokes equations

    R. Temam, Navier-Stokes equations. Theory and numerical analysis , Reprint of the 1984 edition. AMS Chelsea Publishing, Providence, RI, 2001. xiv+408 pp

    1984

  43. [51]

    Wang, J.L

    R. Wang, J.L. Zhai and T.S. Zhang, A moderate deviation principle for 2-D stochastic Navier-Stokes equations. J. Differential Equations , 258, (2015), 3363-3390

    2015

  44. [52]

    Xiong and J.L

    J. Xiong and J.L. Zhai, Large deviations for locally monotone stoc hastic partial differ- ential equations driven by L´ evy noise,Bernoulli, 24, (2018), no. 4A, 2842-2874

    2018

  45. [53]

    Xu and T

    T. Xu and T. Zhang, Large Deviation principles for 2-D stochast ic Navier-Stokes equa- tions driven by L´ evy processes,J. Funct. Anal. 257, (2009), 1519-1545

    2009

  46. [54]

    X. Yang, J. Zhai and T. Zhang, Large deviations for SPDEs of j ump type, Stochastics and Dynamics 2015 (15) Article ID 1550026, 30 pages, DOI: 10.1142/S0219493715500264

    2015 doi

  47. [55]

    Zhao, Yamada-Watanabe theorem for stochastic evolutionequation driven by Poisson Random Measure, ISRN Probability and Statistics 2014 (2014) Article ID 982190, 7 pages

    H. Zhao, Yamada-Watanabe theorem for stochastic evolutionequation driven by Poisson Random Measure, ISRN Probability and Statistics 2014 (2014) Article ID 982190, 7 pages

    2014

  48. [56]

    J. Zhai, T. Zhang, Large deviations for 2-D stochastic Navier- Stokes equations driven by multiplicative L´ evy noises.Bernoulli, 21, (2015), 2351-2392

    2015

  49. [57]

    Zhang, Clark-Ocone formula and variational representatio n for Poisson functionals

    X. Zhang, Clark-Ocone formula and variational representatio n for Poisson functionals. Ann. Probab. 37 (2009) 506-529

    2009

  50. [58]

    compensated Poisson random mea- sures and related topics

    J.(iahui) Zhu, A study of SPDES w.r.t. compensated Poisson random mea- sures and related topics . Ph.D. thesis, University of York, 2010. 80

    2010

  51. [59]

    Brze´ zniak and E

    J.(iahui) Zhu, Z. Brze´ zniak and E. HausenblasMaximal inequality of Stochastic convo- lution driven by Poisson random measure on Banach spaces , Ann. Inst. Henri Poincar´ e Probab. Stat. 53, no. 2, 937-956 (2017)

    2017

  52. [60]

    Brze´ zniak and W

    J.(iahui) Zhu, Z. Brze´ zniak and W. Liu, Maximal inequalities and ex ponential esti- mates for stochastic convolutions driven by L´ evy-type processes in Banach spaces with application to stochastic quasi-geostrophic equations, submitted 81

Pith tools

Reviewed August 14, 2026 · model on record in the stance chip above.