Pith. sign in

REVIEW 3 major objections 5 minor 1 cited by

Non-radial solutions for the quasi-linear H\'enon type $N$-Laplacian Liouville equation

T0 review · 3 major / 5 minor · reviewed 2026-07-31 · deepseek-v4-flash

Challenge this review Re-run · record.json Download PDF Read on arXiv ↗

Pith's one-line read This paper shows that the quasi-linear weighted N-Laplacian Liouville equation gains non-radial solutions at a discrete ladder of explicit Hénon exponents, in every dimension N≥2.

desk verdict Genuinely new p=N result with a coherent bifurcation-approximation strategy, but the load-bearing kernel classification (Thm 1.2/1.4) is deferred to cited works — make the authors write it out before accepting. read the letter →

arxiv 2607.24012 v1 pith:WBRNVMFY submitted 2026-07-27 math.AP

Wei Dai , Lixiu Duan , Changfeng Gui , Yuan Li This is my paper · ORCID
classification math.AP MSC 35J9235B0635B3235B33
keywords LiouvilleequationN-LaplacianHénon-typebifurcationtheorynon-radialsolutionssymmetrybreakinglinearizedoperatorfinite-massclassification
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal

The pith

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The reading

This paper seeks to establish that symmetry breaks in the quasi-linear weighted Liouville equation −Δ_N u = |x|^{Nα} e^u: whenever the weight exponent α hits one of the discrete values α(k)=√(k(N−1)(k+N−2))/(N−1)−1 with k≥2, a branch of non-radial solutions grows out of the unique radial solution, in every dimension N≥2. If the theorem is right, it gives the exact location of symmetry breaking for this equation and extends the classical planar picture, where the ladder is simply α(k)=k−1, to the fully nonlinear N-Laplacian at the critical exponent p=N. The route is an approximation argument: the equation is first solved in balls of huge radius with a carefully chosen boundary value, bifurcation is proved there in spaces of functions with prescribed rotational symmetry, and a long sequence of uniform estimates—decay of normalized differences, a rigidity lemma for the scaling parameter, and a uniform lower bound separating the radial and non-radial branches—lets the ball solutions pass to the whole space. A second thread classifies all finite-mass solutions when −1<α<0, asserting they are exactly the explicit radial family and removing boundedness assumptions that earlier results needed.

What carries the argument

The machinery is built around the critical Hénon exponents α(k)=√(k(N−1)(k+N−2))/(N−1)−1, where the k-th angular eigenvalue λ_k=k(N+k−2) of the spherical Laplacian crosses the first radial eigenvalue of the linearized operator. At these exponents the kernel of the linearized N-Laplacian at the radial solution acquires extra modes from homogeneous harmonic polynomials of degree k; the paper classifies that kernel under a mild logarithmic-growth condition and uses the dimension jump to trigger bifurcation in the subspaces of O(N−1)-invariant (and, for even k, O(N−l)×O(l)-invariant) functions, where the spectral index changes by exactly one. To move from balls to the whole space, the paper prov

What would settle it

Solve (or numerically compute) the linearized equation at α=α(k), N=3, in the class liminf_{|x|→∞} v(x)/ln|x|=0. If the solution space has dimension different from 1+(N+2k−2)(N+k−3)!/((N−2)!k!), in particular if an extra mode exists that is not a linear combination of the scaling mode and the harmonic-polynomial modes, the kernel classification fails and the proof's later contradiction arguments lose their footing. A simpler spectral check: verify that in the ball approximation the first eigenvalue μ_ε(α) actually crosses −k(N+k−2) with derivative −2(N−1)(α+1), at a unique α_k^ε converging to

Watch

Extended reading notes

Core claim

The central assertion is Theorem 1.6: at α=α(k) for k≥2, equation (1.1) has at least one continuum of non-radial solutions, invariant under O(N−1), bifurcating from the radial solution U_{α(k)}; when k is even there are at least ⌊N/2⌋ additional continua with O(N−l)×O(l) symmetry for l=1,...,⌊N/2⌋. Every solution on these branches obeys u∼ln|x|, |∇u|=O(|x|^{-1}) at infinity, and its total mass equals the radial value N (N^2/(N−1))^{N−1} (α+1)^{N−1} ω_N. The proof combines bifurcation on approximating balls with a limiting argument built on new uniform estimates: (ln R)^{-1}-type decay of the weighted Dirichlet integral of the normalized difference, fast pointwise decay of a second normalized

Load-bearing premise

The load-bearing premise is the classification of the kernel of the linearized operator at the radial solution: every solution of the linearized equation whose growth ratio v(x)/ln|x| has liminf 0 at infinity must be a linear combination of the scaling mode and, only at α=α(k), the harmonic-polynomial modes. The proof of this classification is summarized rather than written out, and the later contradiction arguments depend on it.

Editorial extensions

If this is right

  • The branches found at each α(k) form genuine continua: the bifurcation is global, not just local, so the non-radial solutions persist along connected sets in the function space.
  • For even k, the symmetry is organized: there are at least ⌊N/2⌋ distinct continua with different orthogonal symmetries, so a single critical exponent can spawn several geometrically different families.
  • The asymptotic behavior of every constructed solution is the same: logarithmic growth, |∇u|=O(|x|^{-1}), and the radial mass value. Hence mass and leading-order asymptotics do not distinguish radial from non-radial solutions; the difference is in the finer structure of the branch.
  • The singular-range classification closes a gap: for −1<α<0, finite mass alone forces the solution to be one of the explicit radial functions, with no boundedness or small-mass hypotheses.
  • When N=2 the formulas reduce to α(k)=k−1, reproducing the known planar result, which anchors the N-dimensional statements as the natural generalization.

Reading between the lines

Editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • A direct numerical test: in N=3 at α=α(2)=√3−1, a continuation in the O(2)-invariant subspace should show a branch emerging from the radial solution exactly at that exponent, and no bifurcation at nearby generic α; computing the kernel dimension of the linearized operator at that α should give exactly two (scale mode plus one harmonic-polynomial mode).
  • Because the rigidity of the scaling parameter is obtained from boundary-derivative information rather than from the invariance of the total mass, the same strategy may transfer to other scaling-invariant N-Laplacian Liouville-type equations (anisotropic or cone versions) where inversion-type transforms and integral representation formulas are unavailable.
  • The kernel classification, stated with details omitted, is the step I would probe first: if an extra solution of the linearized equation satisfying liminf v/ln|x|=0 existed beyond the listed modes, the identification of the limiting profile h as a single multiple A Z(x) would fail and the uniform lower bound would be in jeopardy.
  • The paper leaves implicit that the approximate bifurcation points α_n^k converge with a definite rate inherited from the first-eigenvalue asymptotics; tracking that rate numerically would give a concrete check of the link between the ball problems and the whole-space theorem.
Share X Bluesky LinkedIn Reddit HN

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, and a circularity audit.

Referee Report

3 major / 5 minor

Summary. The paper studies the weighted N-Laplacian Liouville equation -Δ_N u = |x|^{Nα} e^u in R^N for N≥2. The main result, Theorem 1.6, asserts that for the discrete values α(k) = √(k(N-1)(k+N-2))/(N-1) - 1, k≥2, there exist continua of non-radial solutions bifurcating from the explicit radial solution U_{α(k)}, with specified symmetry and asymptotic behavior, and with the exact total mass. The proof combines a classification of the kernel of the linearized operator (Theorems 1.2 and 1.4), a bifurcation analysis for approximate problems on balls, and a long sequence of uniform estimates (Section 4) to pass to the limit in R^N. The paper also proves a classification result for finite-mass solutions in the singular range α∈(-1,0) (Theorem 1.9).

Significance. If Theorem 1.6 is correct, it is a substantial extension of the classical Prajapat–Tarantello classification/bifurcation result for N=2 to the N-Laplacian case, and it identifies the exact critical Hénon exponents α(k) for all N≥2. The paper is technically ambitious: it develops an approximation scheme with blowing-up boundary values, weighted Hardy-Sobolev inequalities on exterior domains, and delicate De Giorgi–Moser–Nash iteration arguments. The critical exponents are derived from the eigenvalue equation (N-1)(α+1)^2 = k(N+k-2), not imposed by normalization, so I see no circularity. However, the paper's central hinge is Theorem 1.2, a classification of ker L_{F,U_α} under the relaxed growth condition liminf_{|x|→∞} v/ln|x|=0. That theorem is stated without proof. Since Proposition 4.12 uses exactly this classification to identify the limiting profile as A Z(x) and then to obtain the sign contradiction with the Pohozaev identity, the main existence result is not fully established as written. The manuscript would be acceptable only after the omitted proof is supplied or replaced by a complete reduction with all asymptotic cases treated explicitly.

major comments (3)
  1. [Theorem 1.2 / Remark 1.3] The classification of solutions to the linearized equation (1.8) under the assumption v∈L∞_loc∩W^{1,N}_loc with liminf_{|x|→∞} v/ln|x|=0 is the load-bearing step of the paper. The proof is not written: Remark 1.3 defers to Theorem 1 of [47] and Theorem 5.1 of [10], asserting that the global boundedness assumption can be replaced by the liminf condition. This is a genuine gap, not a cosmetic one. The relaxed condition admits functions of logarithmic growth such as (ln r)^σ with 0<σ<1, which are excluded by the L∞ assumption in [10,47]; no indicial-root or asymptotic expansion argument is given to exclude such modes for (1.8). Proposition 4.12 invokes Theorem 1.4 at equation (4.126) to conclude h=A Z(x), and the sign of A drives the contradiction with the Pohozaev identity (4.115) through (4.133)-(4.134). If an additional kernel element with sublogarithmic growth existed, the conclusion h=
  2. [Section 5, Lemma 5.2 and Theorem 5.4] The passage from continua in the approximate balls to a continuum in R^N applies the estimates of Section 4 to arbitrary points on the continua ŽS_n^k, not only to the specially constructed nonradial solutions of Proposition 4.12. In particular, Proposition 4.1 and Proposition 4.12 require hypotheses of the form ∥e^{v_n}-e^{β_{α_n}}∥_γ≤A and inf_{∂B_1} v_n≥B. For points on ŽS_n^k these hypotheses are not explicitly verified. They can likely be forced by choosing δ>0 small enough in the definition of ŽS_n^k, since all points are then close to f_{n,α_n^k} in X; however this choice and the uniform verification should be stated. Without it, Lemma 5.2's precompactness and Theorem 5.4's exclusion of radial limits are not fully justified.
  3. [Theorem 1.1 / proof of radial uniqueness] The short proof of Theorem 1.1 assumes, without justification, that near r_0 one may take u(r)>v(r) and u'(r)>v'(r). Since u(r_0)=v(r_0) and u'(r_0)=v'(r_0) in the present setup, the sign of u-v to the right of r_0 is controlled by higher derivatives and cannot simply be assumed. The displayed contradiction (2.5) is valid once a strict sign of u-v (and a corresponding inequality for the integrals) is established, but the WLOG step is missing. This is not central to the main bifurcation theorem, but the proof should be corrected or the WLOG replaced by a standard ODE comparison argument.
minor comments (5)
  1. [Throughout] The notation β_α and e^{β_α} is sometimes written inconsistently as e^{βα} or e^{β_{α_n}}; please unify.
  2. [Lemma 3.3] The proof ends with 'This finishes our proof of Lemma 3.4.' — the lemma number is wrong; it should be Lemma 3.3.
  3. [Definition 1.5] The definition says 'there exists a point (α, ev_α)' and then 'v_α is a non-radial solution of (1.1)'; presumably the second factor should be e^{v_α}, the transformed function in the space X.
  4. [Equation (1.13) ff.] After (1.13), the text says 'We say v is a solution to (1.8)' but the displayed weak formulation is that of (1.13). The equation number should be corrected.
  5. [Proposition 4.5] The statement says the constant C is independent of n, R, and R_0, but the proof later chooses R_0 sufficiently large depending on the ellipticity constant C_2 and α; the final estimate (4.70) does depend on R_0 through the prefactor [ln R_0]^2. Please rephrase the independence claim precisely.

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged · score 0.0 of 10

No significant circularity: α(k) is derived from the spectral equation (N−1)(α+1)^2=λ_k; the kernel classification is deferred to external references [47,10]; no fitted parameter is renamed as a prediction.

full rationale

The derivation chain is not circular. The critical values α(k) are not fitted to the desired non-radial solutions; they are obtained from the eigenvalue relation (3.45), namely (N−1)(α+1)^2 = λ_k = k(N+k−2), together with the limiting eigenvalue μ_1(α)=−(N−1)(α+1)^2 quoted from Theorem 5.1 of [10]. The bifurcation conclusion Theorem 5.4 follows from a compactness/continuum argument (Lemmas 5.1–5.3) using the uniform lower bound (4.118), which in turn uses Theorem 1.4. Theorem 1.4 is derived from Theorem 1.2 and the kernel identity (2.10). Theorem 1.2 is an external classification result: Remark 1.3 states that the proof is 'similar to Theorem 1 of [47] and Theorem 5.1 of [10]' and omits details. That is a possible rigor gap, not circularity: the cited classification is independent of the paper's existence claim, and the cited works do not contain the target bifurcation result. The self-citations to [13] are methodological templates ('following the methods in Gladiali, Grossi and Neves [26] (see also [13])'), not load-bearing theorem imports. There is no parameter fit, no normalization inserted to force the conclusion, and no renaming of a known empirical pattern. The strongest circularity risk—a possible sublogarithmically growing mode in the liminf-kernel of Theorem 1.2—would be a mathematical error in an omitted proof, not a circular reduction of the conclusion to its hypotheses.

Assumptions & free parameters 1 free parameters · 6 assumptions · 0 invented entities

No data-fitting constants appear: the critical α(k) is derived from an eigenvalue equation. The main structural burden is delegated classification/regularity results from [10,47,48] plus the asserted extension of L∞-bounded kernel classification to a liminf growth condition. The proof also chooses a technical weight γ for the working space, but the final theorem is stated independently of that choice.

free parameters (1)
  • γ, weight exponent in the working space X=W^{1,N}∩L∞_γ = N(α+1)+1/2
    Chosen by hand in (1.16) from the admissible interval (N(α+1), N^2(α+1)/(N−1)); every uniform estimate in §4 is expressed in this norm. The final theorem is independent of this choice, so it is a proof parameter, not a fitted constant.
assumptions (6)
  • ad hoc to paper Classification of the linearized equation at the standard bubble (Theorem 1 in [47], Theorem 5.1 in [10]) and its transfer to the liminf-condition setting in Theorem 1.2 without a written proof.
    Invoked in Remark 1.3 and used through Theorem 1.4 to identify the limiting element h as AZ in Proposition 4.12. The claimed weakening of v∈L∞ to liminf v/ln|x|=0 is the load-bearing unproved step.
  • domain assumption Eigenvalue crossing: for the approximate ball problem, the first eigenvalue μ_1^{ε_n}(α) of the radial linearized problem crosses −λ_k=−k(N+k−2) exactly once at α_n^k→α(k).
    Lemma 3.5/Prop 3.6; spectral decomposition via spherical harmonics plus [45,46]. Needed to define bifurcation points; if multiplicity or crossing differs, branches need not exist.
  • standard math Regularity estimates for degenerate/quasilinear elliptic operators: Lieberman boundary regularity, Tolksdorf gradient estimates, Gilbarg-Trudinger interior estimates, and Sobolev/Moser-Trudinger exponents.
    Used throughout Section 4 for compactness and pointwise decay (Propositions 4.2, 4.10).
  • standard math Weighted (truncated) Hardy-Sobolev inequalities (4.40) and (4.79) hold for the claimed test-function classes in exterior domains.
    Proved in Propositions 4.4 and 4.7 by Fubini/polar-coordinate estimates; the nontrivial input is that they replace the critical embedding that fails for p=N.
  • domain assumption Pohozaev identity (3.9) holds for weak N-Laplacian solutions of the approximate problem.
    Lemma 3.3, derived by elliptic regularization. Used in Props 4.11/4.12 to force λ=1 and A=0 contradictions.
  • standard math The total mass identity of [21] (Lemma 6.4): finite-mass solutions have fixed mass N(N^2/(N−1))^{N−1}(α+1)^{N−1}ω_N.
    Used to extract the fixed-mass assertion in Theorem 1.6 and in singular-case classification.

how reviews work

0 comments
Cite this review

Pith. "Pith review of Non-radial solutions for the quasi-linear H\'enon type $N$-Laplacian Liouville equation." pith.science (2026). https://pith.science/paper/WBRNVMFY

@misc{pith2026260724012,
  author       = {Pith},
  title        = {Pith review of: Non-radial solutions for the quasi-linear H\'enon type $N$-Laplacian Liouville equation},
  year         = {2026},
  howpublished = {\url{https://pith.science/paper/WBRNVMFY}},
  note         = {Machine review of arXiv:2607.24012}
}
abstract

In this paper, we investigate the following quasi-linear weighted $N$-Laplacian Liouville equation \begin{equation*}\label{0} -\Delta_N u=|x|^{N\alpha}e^{u}, \qquad x\in \R^N, \end{equation*} where $N \geq 2$. For $\al>0$, by carefully studying the linearized problem and applying the approximation method and bifurcation theory, we prove that, when the parameter $\alpha$ equals to the critical values $\alpha(k):=\frac{\sqrt{k(N-1)(k+N-2)}}{N-1}-1$ for $k \geq 2$, there exist non-radial solutions $u$ (bifurcating from $U_{\alpha(k)}$) to the above quasi-linear H\'enon type Liouville equation such that $u\sim \ln|x|$, $|\nabla u|= O(|x|^{-1})$ at $\infty$ and $\int_{\R^N}|x|^{N\alpha}e^{u}\md x=N\left(\frac{N^2}{N-1}\right)^{N-1}(\alpha+1)^{N-1}\omega_N$. One should note that, $\alpha(k)=k-1$ for $k\geq2$ when $N=2$. Our results successfully extend the existence result of J. Prajapat and G. Tarantello in \cite{PT} concerning the $2$-dimension and Laplacian case (i.e., $N=2$) to the more general $N$-dimension and $N$-Laplacian cases ($N\geq 2$), and extend the results of F. Gladiali, M. Grossi, and S. L. N. Neves in \cite{GGN} and the authors in \cite{DDGL} from $1<p<N$ to the much more complicated limiting case $p=N$. We introduced some new ideas and overcame a series of crucial difficulties, including the nonlinearity nature of the $N$-Laplacian $\Delta_N$, the lack of Green integral representation formula and critical weighted Sobolev embedding inequality, the absence of Kelvin type transforms for linearized/difference equations, the invariance of the total mass under scalings of $u$, and the signs-changing and divergence (to $-\infty$) at $\infty$ of the solutions, which makes the suitable choices of the approximate problems, the (normalized) approximate function sequences and the working space to be quite difficult.

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Forward citations

Cited by 1 Pith paper

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score. Full citation record

  1. Optimal Rigidity and Classification Results for the $k$-Hessian Equation of Lane--Emden Type

    math.AP 2026-08 accept novelty 8.0 of 10

    For sigma_k(-D^2u)=u^p in R^n, the paper proves all nonnegative entire solutions vanish for the previously open exponent range, and identifies the critical exponent as the sharp Liouville threshold.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

50 extracted references · 4 linked inside Pith · cited by 1 Pith paper

  1. [13]

    W. Dai, L. Duan, C. Gui and Y. Li,Non-radial solutions for the critical quasi-linear H´ enon equation involving p-Laplacian inR N , Proc. London Math. Soc.,132(2026), no. 4, e70148, 61 pp

    2026

  2. [47]

    Takahashi,Nondegeneracy of the entire solution for theN-Laplace Liouville equation, Funkcial

    F. Takahashi,Nondegeneracy of the entire solution for theN-Laplace Liouville equation, Funkcial. Ekvac.,67 (2024), no. 2, 217–227

    2024

  3. [10]

    Ciraolo, P

    G. Ciraolo, P. Esposito and X. Li,On the classification of solutions to a class ofN-Liouville equations inR N , arXiv:2604.10050, 21 pp

    arXiv

  4. [1]

    Ambrosetti and J

    A. Ambrosetti and J. L. Gamez,Branches of positive solutions for some semilinear Schrodinger equations, Math. Z.,224(1997), no. 3, 347–362

    1997

  5. [2]

    Ambrosetti and A

    A. Ambrosetti and A. Malchiodi,Nonlinear Analysis and Semilinear Elliptic Problems, Cambridge Stud. Adv. Math., 2007, vol. 104, Cambridge University Press

    2007

  6. [3]

    Bonheure, J

    D. Bonheure, J. B. Casteras and F. Gladiali,Bifurcation analysis of the Hardy-Sobolev equation, J. Differential Equations,296(2021), 759–798

    2021

  7. [4]

    D. Cao, W. Dai and G. Qin,Super poly-harmonic properties, Liouville theorems and classification of nonnegative solutions to equations involving higher-order fractional Laplacians, Trans. Amer. Math. Soc.,374(2021), no. 7, 4781-4813

    2021

  8. [5]

    D. Cao, S. Peng and S. Yan,Infinitely many solutions forp-Laplacian equation involving critical Sobolev growth, J. Funct. Anal.,262(2012), no. 6, 2861–2902

    2012

Show all 50 references
  1. [6]

    Cao,Nontrivial solution of semilinear elliptic equation with critical exponent inR 2, Comm

    D. Cao,Nontrivial solution of semilinear elliptic equation with critical exponent inR 2, Comm. Partial Differential Equations,17(1992), no. 3-4, 407-435

    1992

  2. [7]

    S.-Y. A. Chang and P. C. Yang,On uniqueness of solutions ofn-th order differential equations in conformal geometry, Math. Res. Lett.,4(1997), 91-102

    1997

  3. [8]

    W. Chen, W. Dai and G. Qin,Liouville type theorems, a priori estimates and existence of solutions for critical and super-critical order Hardy-H´ enon type equations inRn, Math. Z.,303(2023), Paper No. 104, 36 pp

    2023

  4. [9]

    Chen and C

    W. Chen and C. Li,Classification of solutions of some nonlinear elliptic equations, Duke Math. J.,63(1991), no. 3, 615–623

    1991

  5. [11]

    Ciraolo and X

    G. Ciraolo and X. Li,Classification of solutions to the anisotropicN-Liouville equation inR N , Int. Math. Res. Not. IMRN, (2024), no. 19, 12824–12856

    2024

  6. [12]

    Ciraolo, F

    G. Ciraolo, F. Pacella and C. Polvara,Symmetry breaking and instability for semilinear elliptic equations in spherical sectors and cones, J. Math. Pures Appl.,187(2024), no. 9, 138–170

    2024

  7. [14]

    W. Dai, C. Gui and Y. Luo,Anisotropic FinslerN-Laplacian Liouville Equation in Convex Cones, preprint, arXiv:2407.04987, 38 pp

    arXiv

  8. [15]

    W. Dai, C. Gui, Y. Hu and S. Peng,Nonlinear Neumann boundary problems forn-Laplacian Liouville equation on a half space, preprint, arXiv:2602.06414, 49 pp

  9. [16]

    W. Dai, Z. Liu and B. Sciunzi,Classification of solutions to−∆u=e −2u in the half-space, Revista Mat. Iberoam., 42(2026), no. 3, 1039–1058

    2026

  10. [17]

    Dai and G

    W. Dai and G. Qin,Liouville type theorem for critical order H´ enon-Lane-Emden type equations on a half space and its applications, J. Funct. Anal.,281(2021), no. 10, Paper No. 109227, 37 pp

    2021

  11. [18]

    Dai and G

    W. Dai and G. Qin,Liouville type theorems for fractional and higher order H´ enon-Hardy type equations via the method of scaling spheres, Int. Math. Res. Not. IMRN,2023(2023)., no. 11, 9001–9070

    2023

  12. [19]

    Denis, C

    B. Denis, C. Jean-Baptiste and G. Francesca,Bifurcation analysis of the Hardy-Sobolev equation, J. Differential Equations,296(2021), 759–798

    2021

  13. [20]

    Esposito,A classification result for the quasi-linear Liouville equation, Ann

    P. Esposito,A classification result for the quasi-linear Liouville equation, Ann. Inst. H. Poincar´ e Anal. Non Lin´ eaire.,35(2018), no. 3, 781–801

    2018

  14. [21]

    Esposito,Isolated singularities for then-Liouville equation, Calc

    P. Esposito,Isolated singularities for then-Liouville equation, Calc. Var. Partial Differential Equations.,60 (2021), no. 4, Paper No. 137, 17 pp

    2021

  15. [22]

    Figalli and R

    A. Figalli and R. Neumayer,Gradient stability for the Sobolev inequality: the casep≥2, J. Eur. Math. Soc.,21 (2019), no. 2, 319–354

    2019

  16. [23]

    Figalli and Y

    A. Figalli and Y. Zhang,Sharp gradient stability for the Sobolev inequality, Duke Math. J.,171(2022), no. 12, 2407–2459

    2022

  17. [24]

    Gilbarg and N

    D. Gilbarg and N. S. Trudinger,Elliptic partial differential equations of second order, Springer-Verlag, Berlin- New York (1977)

    1977

  18. [25]

    Gladiali,A global bifurcation result for a semilinear elliptic equation, J

    F. Gladiali,A global bifurcation result for a semilinear elliptic equation, J. Math. Anal. Appl.,369(2010), no. 1, 306–311. 60 WEI DAI, LIXIU DUAN, CHANGFENG GUI, YUAN LI

    2010

  19. [26]

    Gladiali, M

    F. Gladiali, M. Grossi and S. L. N. Neves,Nonradial solutions for the H´ enon equation inR N , Adv. Math.,249 (2013), 1–36

    2013

  20. [27]

    Gladiali, M

    F. Gladiali, M. Grossi, F. Pacella and P. N. Srikanth,Bifurcation and symmetry breaking for a class of semilinear elliptic equations in an annulus, Calc. Var. Partial Differential Equations,40(2011), no. 3-4, 295–317

    2011

  21. [28]

    Gladiali and F

    F. Gladiali and F. Pacella,Bifurcation and asymptotic analysis for a class of supercritical elliptic problems in an exterior domain, Nonlinearity,24(2011), no. 5, 1575–1594

    2011

  22. [29]

    C. Gui, F. Hang and A. Moradifam,The sphere covering inequality and its dual, Comm. Pure Appl. Math.,73 (2020), no. 12, 2685-2707

    2020

  23. [30]

    C. Gui, A. Jevnikar and A. Moradifam,Symmetry and uniqueness of solutions to some Liouville-type equations and systems, Comm. Partial Differential Equations,43(2018), no. 3, 428–447

    2018

  24. [31]

    Gui and A

    C. Gui and A. Moradifam,The sphere covering inequality and its applications, Invent. Math.,214(2018), no. 3, 1169–1204

    2018

  25. [32]

    Jiang and J

    Q. Jiang and J. Xiong,Existence of non-radial entire solutions for the H´ enon equation beyond even exponents, preprint, arXiv: 2606.31670, 21 pp

    arXiv

  26. [33]

    Y. Y. Li and M. Zhu,Uniqueness theorems through the method of moving spheres, Duke Math. J.,80(1995), no. 2, 383-417

    1995

  27. [34]

    G. M. Lieberman,Boundary regularity for solutions of degenerate elliptic equations, Nonlinear Anal.,12(1988), no. 11, 1203–1219

    1988

  28. [35]

    C. S. Lin,A classification of solutions of a conformally invariant fourth order equation inR n +, Comment. Math. Helv.,73(1998), 206-231

    1998

  29. [36]

    Liouville,Sur l’´ equation aux d´ eriv´ ees partielles∂2 logλ/∂u∂v±2λa 2 = 0, J

    J. Liouville,Sur l’´ equation aux d´ eriv´ ees partielles∂2 logλ/∂u∂v±2λa 2 = 0, J. Math.,18(1853), 71-72

  30. [37]

    A. I. Nazarov and N. V. Rastegaev,Non-radial minimizers for Hardy-Sobolev inequalities in non-convex cones, preprint, arXiv:2507.04470v1

    arXiv

  31. [38]

    V. H. Nguyen,Improved singular Moser-Trudinger and their extremal functions, Potential Analysis,53(2020), no. 1, 55–58

    2020

  32. [39]

    Pistoia and E

    A. Pistoia and E. Serra,Multi-peak solutions for the H´ enon equation with slightly subcritical growth, Math. Z., 256(2007), no. 1, 75–97

    2007

  33. [40]

    Pistoia and G

    A. Pistoia and G. Vaira,Nondegeneracy of the bubble for the criticalp-Laplace equation, Proc. Roy. Soc. Edinburgh Sect. A.,151(2021), no. 1, 151–168

    2021

  34. [41]

    Prajapat and G

    J. Prajapat and G. Tarantello,On a class of elliptic problems inR 2: symmetry and uniqueness results, Proc. Roy. Soc. Edinburgh Sect. A.,131(2001), no. 4, 967–985

    2001

  35. [42]

    P. H. Rabinowitz,Some global results for nonlinear eigenvalue problems, J. Funct. Anal.,7(1971), 487–513

    1971

  36. [43]

    Serrin,Local behavior of solutions of quasilinear equations, Acta Math.,111(1964), 247–302

    J. Serrin,Local behavior of solutions of quasilinear equations, Acta Math.,111(1964), 247–302

    1964

  37. [44]

    Smets, J

    D. Smets, J. Su and M. Willem,Non-radial ground states for the H´ enon equation, Commun. Contemp. Math.,4 (2002), no. 3, 467–480

    2002

  38. [45]

    Smoller and A

    J. Smoller and A. Wasserman,Symmetry-breaking for solutions of semilinear elliptic equations with general bound- ary conditions, Comm. Math. Phys.,105(1986), no. 3, 415–441

    1986

  39. [46]

    Smoller and A

    J. Smoller and A. Wasserman,Bifurcation and symmetry-breaking, Invent. Math.,100(1990), no. 1, 63–95

    1990

  40. [48]

    Tolksdorf,Regularity for more general class of quasilinear elliptic equations, J

    P. Tolksdorf,Regularity for more general class of quasilinear elliptic equations, J. Differ. Equ.,51(1984), no. 1, 126–150

    1984

  41. [49]

    Wei and X

    J. Wei and X. Xu,Classification of solutions of higher order conformally invariant equations, Math. Ann.,313 (1999), no. 2, 207-228

    1999

  42. [50]

    Willem,Bifurcation, symmetry and Morse theory, Boll

    M. Willem,Bifurcation, symmetry and Morse theory, Boll. Unione Mat. Ital. B.,3(1989), no. 1, 17–27. School of Mathematical Sciences, Beihang University (BUAA), Beijing 100191, P. R. China, and Key Laboratory of Mathematics, Informatics and Behavioral Semantics, Ministry of Edu...

    1989

Pith tools

Reviewed July 31, 2026 · model on record in the stance chip above.