Pith. sign in

REVIEW 3 major objections 5 minor 55 references

Evidence of oscillating `compact' Comptonized corona in GRS 1915+105: Insights into HFQPOs with AstroSat

T0 review · 3 major / 5 minor · reviewed 2026-08-07 · deepseek-v4-flash

Challenge this review Re-run · record.json Download PDF Read on arXiv ↗

Pith's one-line read The 70 Hz HFQPOs in GRS 1915+105 come from a compact, oscillating Comptonized corona near the black hole.

desk verdict Useful new dynamical HFQPO correlation, but the compact-corona claim rests on a model-dependent radius. read the letter →

arxiv 2506.00935 v1 pith:WBZHUW76 submitted 2025-06-01 astro-ph.HE

Sreehari Harikesh , Seshadri Majumder , Santabrata Das , Anuj Nandi This is my paper
classification astro-ph.HE
keywords GRS1915+105high-frequencyquasi-periodicoscillationsComptonizedcoronaAstroSataccretiondiskblackholeX-raybinariestimingthermalComptonization
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal

The pith

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The reading

The paper argues that the ~70 Hz high-frequency quasi-periodic oscillations (HFQPOs) seen in the black hole X-ray binary GRS 1915+105 are produced by a compact Comptonizing corona that oscillates near the black hole. Using AstroSat observations of four soft variability classes ($\delta$, $\kappa$, $\omega$, $\gamma$), the authors split each light curve into high-count-rate 'non-dips' and low-count-rate 'dips', and track spectral and timing properties in successive 32-second segments. They find that the HFQPO is present only in harder spectral states (photon index $\Gamma_{\mathrm{nth}} \lesssim 2$, hardness ratio $\mathrm{HR1}\gtrsim 1$) where the inner disk radius is small ($R_{\mathrm{in}} \lesssim 4\,r_g$), and absent in softer states ($\Gamma_{\mathrm{nth}} \gtrsim 2.2$, $R_{\mathrm{in}} \gtrsim 7\,r_g$). Broadband spectral modeling with thermal Comptonization and relativistic disk models places the Comptonizing region between about $2.8$ and $16\,r_g$. If correct, this links a specific fast timing signal to a measurable geometric quantity, the compactness of the corona, in an accreting black hole system.

What carries the argument

The argument is carried by three linked tools. Dynamic power spectra, computed in 32-second segments with 1 Hz frequency bins, locate the HFQPO in time and energy, and show that it is confined to the $6$--$25$ keV band. Time-resolved spectral fitting of the $3$--$25$ keV band with the thermal Comptonization model nthComp tracks the photon index $\Gamma_{\mathrm{nth}}$ and normalization $N_{\mathrm{nth}}$, revealing that the HFQPO appears whenever the spectrum is hard and the normalization is high. Broadband spectral fits using the relativistic disk model kerrd, with the black hole mass, distance, inclination, and spin fixed, provide the inner disk radius $R_{\mathrm{in}}$, which the authors interpret as the size of the Comptonizing corona; the pseudo-Newtonian diskpn model is used to set an upper bound on that size. The correlation structure among these quantities, with QPO power, $\mathrm{HR1}$, $N_{\mathrm{nth}}$, and luminosity rising together while $\Gamma_{\mathrm{nth}}$ and $R_{\mathrm{in}}$ fall, is what connects the timing signal to a compact coronal geometry.

What would settle it

A direct disproof would be an observation of ~70 Hz HFQPOs in GRS 1915+105 during a spectrally soft state ($\Gamma_{\mathrm{nth}} \gtrsim 2.2$) with a large inferred inner radius ($R_{\mathrm{in}} \gtrsim 7\,r_g$), or a re-analysis of the same data with free black hole spin or a different relativistic disk model that removes the $R_{\mathrm{in}}$ contrast between dips and non-dips.

Watch

Extended reading notes

Core claim

The central discovery is a consistent dynamical correlation, traced in 32-second segments, between the presence of the ~70 Hz HFQPO and the spectral and geometric state of the inner accretion flow. In the $\kappa$ and $\omega$ variability classes, which show alternating dips and non-dips, the HFQPO appears exactly in the non-dip intervals, where the thermal Comptonization photon index is harder ($\Gamma_{\mathrm{nth}} \lesssim 2$), the hardness ratio $\mathrm{HR1}$ is higher, and the inner disk radius returned by the relativistic kerrd model is smaller ($R_{\mathrm{in}} \lesssim 4\,r_g$). In the dip intervals the spectrum softens ($\Gamma_{\mathrm{nth}} \gtrsim 2.2$, $\mathrm{HR1}\lesssim 0.7$), the inferred radius grows to $\gtrsim 7\,r_g$, and the HFQPO is not detected. The same pattern holds for the $\delta$ and $\gamma$ classes, which remain in the hard, compact regime and show persistent HFQPOs. Modeling the $0.7$--$50$ keV spectra with thermal Comptonization plus a power law, and independently estimating the inner radius with kerrd and diskpn, the authors infer a corona size of roughly $2.8$--$16\,r_g$. They conclude that the ~70 Hz oscillations are the signature of a compact, oscillating Comptonized corona modulating the high-energy radiation, rather than an orbital or diskoseismic phenomenon.

Load-bearing premise

The inference rests on treating the inner disk radius from the kerrd model as the true size of the Comptonizing corona, and on the fixed black hole parameters (mass 12.4 solar masses, distance 8.6 kpc, spin 0.998) that set that radius, so if the corona is not co-spatial with the inner disk or those parameters are wrong, the compact oscillating corona does not follow from the data.

Editorial extensions

If this is right

  • In GRS 1915+105, a 32-second interval showing a ~70 Hz HFQPO will also show a hard thermal Comptonization spectrum ($\Gamma_{\mathrm{nth}} \lesssim 2$), $\mathrm{HR1}\gtrsim 1$, and an inner radius $R_{\mathrm{in}} \lesssim 4\,r_g$, while a soft interval ($\Gamma_{\mathrm{nth}} \gtrsim 2.2$, $R_{\mathrm{in}} \gtrsim 7\,r_g$) will not show the oscillation.
  • The Comptonizing corona in these states is compact, with size $2.8$--$16\,r_g$, and the smaller end of that range coincides with HFQPO detection.
  • The 70 Hz modulation is carried by Comptonized photons in the $6$--$25$ keV band, so the high-energy emission, not the thermal disk component, is the source of the oscillation.
  • The oscillation switches on and off on timescales of tens of seconds, faster than the viscous timescale, implying a sub-Keplerian accretion flow governs the inner region.

Reading between the lines

Editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • If the association is real and repeatable, the ~70 Hz frequency may be set by the size or oscillation mode of the compact corona rather than by orbital motion in the disk, a distinction that could be tested by searching a larger sample of GRS 1915+105 observations for the same hardness-radius threshold.
  • Re-fitting the same data with a freely varying black hole spin, or with an alternative relativistic disk model, would show whether the reported $R_{\mathrm{in}}$ contrast between dips and non-dips survives, or is an artifact of the fixed 0.998 spin assumption.
  • The same 32-second spectro-temporal tracking could be applied to archival RXTE data of GRS 1915+105 and other black hole X-ray binaries to test whether HFQPOs in those sources also require a compact, hard coronal geometry.
  • Because the current power-spectral analysis does not measure phase coherence across energy bands, a direct prediction of the oscillating-corona picture is that the 70 Hz modulation should show correlated time lags between soft and hard Comptonized photons; checking this would independently test the model.
Share X Bluesky LinkedIn Reddit HN

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, and a circularity audit.

Referee Report

3 major / 5 minor

Summary. The paper presents a dynamical spectro-temporal analysis of four AstroSat observations of GRS 1915+105 in the δ, κ, ω, and γ variability classes, all showing ~70 Hz high-frequency quasi-periodic oscillations (HFQPOs). The authors model broadband (0.7–50 keV) spectra with thermal Comptonization (nthComp) plus a power-law component, and use the relativistic disk model kerrd (with fixed spin 0.998) and the pseudo-Newtonian diskpn model to estimate the inner disk radius. They report that HFQPOs occur preferentially in high-count-rate 'non-dip' intervals, which have harder spectra (lower Γ_nth, higher HR1) and smaller kerrd inner radii (~3 rg), while 'dip' intervals are softer and have larger radii (~5–7 rg). They further report correlations of QPO strength with count rate, HR1, and nthComp normalization, and anti-correlations with Γ_nth, and conclude that a compact oscillating Comptonized corona modulates the high-energy radiation.

Significance. If the central inference is correct, the paper provides a rare, time-resolved link between the presence of HFQPOs and spectral parameters (hardness, Comptonization normalization, and inferred inner radius) in GRS 1915+105, extending previous static analyses to 32-second dynamical timescales. The accumulated dip/non-dip spectral fits are well executed, with reduced chi-square near unity, and the full-band QPO detection at 5.6σ is solid. However, the headline physical conclusion—a 'compact' oscillating corona—rests on two fragile steps: equating the kerrd inner disk radius with the Comptonizing corona size, and adopting a maximal-spin prior that forces Rin near 3 rg. The alternative diskpn model gives radii of 14–17 rg with comparable fit quality, so the data do not by themselves establish compactness. The dynamical correlations in Fig. 5 are also presented without quantified uncertainties or significance levels. These issues make the empirical associations credible but the interpretive claim premature.

major comments (3)
  1. [§3.1, Table 1; §4] The 'compact' corona conclusion depends on the kerrd model with spin fixed to a = 0.998. Table 1 shows that the alternative diskpn model (Model-2) yields Rin ≈ 14.6–16.6 rg for the same observations, with comparable goodness of fit (e.g., for the ω class, kerrd χ²/dof = 1.08 versus diskpn χ²/dof = 1.13). The abstract's quoted range 2.8–16 rg spans both possibilities, but the central claim in §4 that HFQPOs occur at Rin ≲ 4 rg and are absent at Rin ≳ 7 rg is taken specifically from the kerrd values. Because the spin is fixed rather than fitted, the small radii are largely imposed by assumption, not measured. The authors should either fit the spin (or at least show how Rin and the conclusions vary with spin) or explicitly state that the compactness inference is conditional on maximal spin; otherwise the claim is not supported by the data.
  2. [§4] The sentence 'We associate the inner disc radius with the size of a Compton corona' is a load-bearing assumption that is not justified. kerrd models the thermal disk emission and returns a disk inner edge; the Comptonizing region need not be co-spatial with the inner disk (e.g., it could be a corona above the disk or an extended hot flow). The paper's physical conclusion—that a compact corona oscillates to produce the HFQPO—requires this identification, but no argument or test is provided. At minimum, the authors should discuss alternative geometries and state what observations or model comparisons could distinguish co-spatial versus extended corona configurations.
  3. [§3.2, Figure 5] The dynamical spectral analysis fits the 32-second spectra with nthComp alone over 3–25 keV, while the full-band analysis in §3.1 shows that an additional power-law component is required (for the ω class, χ²/dof improves from 2.11 to 1.15 upon adding powerlaw). If the power-law component contributes non-negligibly in the 3–25 keV band, then the time-dependent Γ_nth and N_nth values may be biased, and the reported anti-correlation and correlation with count rate could reflect degeneracy between nthComp and the omitted power-law rather than physical changes in the Comptonizing corona. In addition, Fig. 5 shows no error bars or significance estimates for the 32-second parameters; the text mentions larger uncertainties during dips but does not quantify them. The authors should provide uncertainties and, if possible, a check of the dynamic fits with both components included or with a fixed power-law contribution.
minor comments (5)
  1. [Table 1 and Table 2 captions] The model definitions are inconsistent between tables: Table 1 lists Model-1 as constant*Tbabs*edge*smedge(nthComp+powerlaw), while Table 2 lists Model-1 without the constant. Please harmonize the notation.
  2. [§3.2] The definitions of HR1 and HR2 are given in the text, but the phrase 'hardness ratios' should also specify whether they are count-rate ratios or flux ratios, and the energy bands should be stated consistently with Fig. 5 panels.
  3. [Figure 5] The dynamic PDS panel would benefit from a color bar with quantitative units and from clearly marking the times when HFQPO is formally detected versus not detected, since the text states detection in non-dips and non-detection in dips.
  4. [§1 and §3.1] The phrase 'softer variability classes' is used even though the non-dip spectra are relatively hard (Γ_nth ~1.8). This terminology should be clarified to avoid confusion between variability class names and spectral state.
  5. [General] There are several text extraction/formatting artifacts in the provided manuscript (e.g., title spacing, 'L ATEX', garbled table columns). Please ensure the final version is cleanly typeset.

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged · score 0.0 of 10

No significant circularity: the dynamic associations are data-driven, and the corona-size identification is an openly stated assumption rather than a fitted prediction.

full rationale

The paper's central inference is an observed association between HFQPO presence and spectrally harder states with smaller kerrd inner radius, built from independent timing and spectral fits. No equation is derived from itself: the 32 s dynamical analysis is a new measurement, and the QPO is re-detected in the paper's own PDS rather than imported as a fitted result. The 'compact corona' interpretation is explicitly premised on an assumption, 'We associate the inner disc radius with the size of a Compton corona' (Section 4), which makes the conclusion model-dependent: kerrd with spin fixed to 0.998 gives ~3-4 rg while diskpn gives ~15 rg for the same data. However, the paper reports both models and does not present either as a prediction or as a first-principles derivation; this is a correctness risk about model dependence, not circularity. Self-citations to Sreehari et al. (2020) and Majumder et al. (2022) supply the prior HFQPO detections and the corona hypothesis, but the present work re-detects the HFQPOs in its own power spectra and adds new dynamical correlations, so those citations are supporting evidence rather than an unverified internal premise. The acknowledged limitation that the 32 s dynamic spectra are modelled with nthComp alone (Section 4) is transparent and does not hide a circular reduction. Accordingly, no circular step is present.

Assumptions & free parameters 4 free parameters · 5 assumptions · 1 invented entities

The central inference rests on fitted spectral parameters (Γ_nth, N_nth, kTe, R_in) and on assumptions about source parameters, spectral decomposition, and the physical interpretation of R_in as corona size. There are no genuinely universal constants derived here, and the invented oscillating corona has no falsifiable handle outside the correlations used to support it.

free parameters (4)
  • Γ_nth (nthComp photon index) = 1.68-1.92 (static); 1.77-1.78 in non-dips; 1.99-2.06 in dips
    Fitted to broadband and 32-second spectra; the reported anti-correlation with count rate and QPO presence is the central empirical result.
  • N_nth (nthComp normalization) = 5.6-10 (static Table 1); 6-10 in kappa/omega segments
    Fitted normalization of thermal Comptonization; correlates with count rate and non-dip segments.
  • R_in (inner disk radius from kerrd) = 2.87-3.72 r_g (non-dips or static); 5.35-6.69 r_g (dips)
    Fitted inner radius; interpreted as corona size, central to the compact corona inference; depends on fixed spin, mass, distance, and inclination.
  • kTe (electron temperature) = 2.13-2.89 keV
    Fitted thermal Comptonization temperature; used to characterize the Comptonizing medium.
assumptions (5)
  • domain assumption Distance = 8.6 kpc, black hole mass = 12.4 M_sun, inclination = 65 degrees, and spin a = 0.998 (for kerrd) are assumed from literature.
    Used to convert model normalizations into physical inner radii and luminosities (Section 3.1). Wrong values shift absolute scales though not the state-dependent contrast.
  • domain assumption The absorbed spectral model Tbabs*edge*smedge*(nthComp+powerlaw) with gain corrections adequately represents the source and instrumental response.
    The broadband fits require these components to reach reduced chi-square near unity (Section 3.1); the decomposition into two additive continua is model dependent.
  • ad hoc to paper The inner disk radius from kerrd equals the size of the Comptonizing corona.
    Stated in Section 4 as 'We associate the inner disc radius with the size of a Compton corona'; no independent evidence establishes co-spatiality.
  • ad hoc to paper The 32-second dynamic fits using only nthComp (excluding the power-law component) track the same thermal Comptonization component as the full-band model.
    Section 3.2 restricts the dynamic energy range to 3-25 keV and drops the power-law to reduce noise; this assumes the excluded component does not bias Γ_nth and N_nth.
  • domain assumption QPO detection significance in each 32-second segment is sufficient to classify presence or absence.
    Dynamic PDS in Figure 5 are shown color-coded but no per-segment significance thresholds are given (Section 3.2).
invented entities (1)
  • Compact oscillating Comptonized corona
    purpose: Proposed source of 70 Hz HFQPO modulation; oscillates at about 70 Hz and Comptonizes soft photons.
    The paper infers this entity from correlations between QPO presence, spectral hardness, and inner radius in a single source; no independent observable or mechanism is provided beyond the same data.

how reviews work

0 comments
Cite this review

Pith. "Pith review of Evidence of oscillating `compact' Comptonized corona in GRS 1915+105: Insights into HFQPOs with AstroSat." pith.science (2026). https://pith.science/paper/WBZHUW76

@misc{pith2026250600935,
  author       = {Pith},
  title        = {Pith review of: Evidence of oscillating `compact' Comptonized corona in GRS 1915+105: Insights into HFQPOs with AstroSat},
  year         = {2026},
  howpublished = {\url{https://pith.science/paper/WBZHUW76}},
  note         = {Machine review of arXiv:2506.00935}
}
abstract

We present, for the first time, an in-depth dynamical analysis of the spectro-temporal properties of the soft variability classes ($\delta$, $\kappa$, $\omega$, and $\gamma$) of GRS 1915+105 during the detection of $\sim$70 Hz High-Frequency Quasi-periodic Oscillations (HFQPOs) using AstroSat data. The wide-band spectra ($0.7-50$ keV) are well described by thermal Comptonization along with an extended power-law component. Additionally, power spectra ($0.01-500$ Hz) indicate that Comptonized photons ($6-25$ keV) primarily contribute to the HFQPOs. Our findings reveal that high (low) count rates referred to as `non-dips' (`dips') in the light curves of the variability classes correspond to the detection (non-detection) of HFQPOs. Accumulated `non-dips' (`dips') spectra are modelled separately using thermal Comptonization (\texttt{nthComp}) as well as \texttt{kerrd} which indicates harder spectra and smaller inner disc radius during the detection of HFQPOs. We conduct dynamical analyses (every 32 s) to trace the presence of HFQPOs, and variations in thermal Comptonization parameters ($\Gamma_{\rm nth}$ and ${\rm N}_{\rm nth}$). Moreover, we observe a positive correlation of `non-dips' with QPO strength, ${\rm HR}1$, and ${\rm N}_{\rm nth}$, while $\Gamma_{\rm nth}$ shows an anti-correlation, suggesting that high-energy photons from the Comptonized corona are responsible for the HFQPOs. Furthermore, we estimate the size of the Comptonized corona using \texttt{kerrd} and \texttt{diskpn} to be $\sim 2.8 - 16$ $r_{\rm g}$. Thus, we infer that a `compact' oscillating corona likely modulates the high-energy radiation, exhibiting the $70$ Hz HFQPOs in GRS 1915$+$105.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2506.00935 by the authors.

Figure 1
Figure 1. Variation of (a) photon count rate as observed with MAXI and (b) the hardness ratio (HR) with time. Dashed vertical lines denote different variability classes as observed by AstroSat and the corresponding light curves are shown at the inset of panel (a). (c) Power spectral distribution in rms-frequency space is plotted for ω class observation (Orbit 10394, MJD 57995.40). At the insets, PDS in different energy band a… view at source ↗
Figure 2
Figure 2. Left: Power density spectrum (PDS) and energy spectral distribution obtained by co-adding data from the ‘dips’ segments of the light curve in the ω class (orbit 10394) of GRS 1915 + 105 are shown in the top and bottom panels, respectively. Right: Corresponding results obtained from the ‘non-dips’ segments of the light curve. See the text for details. the thermally Comptonized cloud represented by nthComp. The relati… view at source ↗
Figure 3
Figure 3. Correlations between parameters of nthComp and powerlaw components of Model-1 are presented for the ‘dips’ segment of the ω class variability. In addition to the contours, we also show the distribution of each parameter on the top. The powerlaw parameters, such as ΓPL and NPL, are positively correlated and both of them are anti-correlated with the nthComp parameters (Γnth, kTe and Nnth). See the text for details. is… view at source ↗
Figures from the paper (2 more)
Figure 4
Figure 4. Figure 4: Same as [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p006_4.png]
Figure 5
Figure 5. Figure 5: Dynamical variation of spectro-temporal parameters for ω class (left) and κ class (right) are shown. The count rate (kcts/s), νQPO (Hz), HR1, HR2, Γnth, Nnth, Rin(rg) and L (LEdd) are presented successively from top to bottom panels for ω and κ classes. The spectral pa…

Discussion (0). Sign in to comment.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

55 extracted references · 21 canonical work pages

  1. [1]

    K., Nandi A., Girish V., Ramadevi M

    Agrawal V. K., Nandi A., Girish V., Ramadevi M. C., 2018, @doi [ ] 10.1093/mnras/sty1005 , http://adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2018MNRAS.477.5437A 477, 5437

    work page doi:10.1093/mnras/sty1005 2018

  2. [2]

    Altamirano D., Belloni T., 2012, @doi [ ] 10.1088/2041-8205/747/1/L4 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2012ApJ...747L...4A 747, L4

    doi:10.1088/2041-8205/747/1/l4 2012

  3. [3]

    M., et al., 2017, @doi [ ] 10.3847/1538-4365/aa7a0e , http://adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2017ApJS..231...10A 231, 10

    Antia H. M., et al., 2017, @doi [ ] 10.3847/1538-4365/aa7a0e , http://adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2017ApJS..231...10A 231, 10

    doi:10.3847/1538-4365/aa7a0e 2017

  4. [4]

    P., Nandi A., 2023, @doi [ ] 10.1093/mnras/stad2072 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2023MNRAS.525..489A 525, 489

    Athulya M. P., Nandi A., 2023, @doi [ ] 10.1093/mnras/stad2072 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2023MNRAS.525..489A 525, 489

    doi:10.1093/mnras/stad2072 2023

  5. [5]

    P., Radhika D., Agrawal V

    Athulya M. P., Radhika D., Agrawal V. K., Ravishankar B. T., Naik S., Mandal S., Nandi A., 2022, @doi [ ] 10.1093/mnras/stab3614 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2022MNRAS.510.3019A 510, 3019

    doi:10.1093/mnras/stab3614 2022

  6. [6]

    M., Altamirano D., 2013, @doi [ ] 10.1093/mnras/stt500 , http://adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2013MNRAS.432...10B 432, 10

    Belloni T. M., Altamirano D., 2013, @doi [ ] 10.1093/mnras/stt500 , http://adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2013MNRAS.432...10B 432, 10

    doi:10.1093/mnras/stt500 2013

  7. [7]

    R., van der Klis M., van Paradijs J., 1997, @doi [ ] 10.1086/310944 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/1997ApJ...488L.109B 488, L109

    Belloni T., M \'e ndez M., King A. R., van der Klis M., van Paradijs J., 1997, @doi [ ] 10.1086/310944 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/1997ApJ...488L.109B 488, L109

    work page doi:10.1086/310944 1997

  8. [8]

    Belloni T., Klein-Wolt M., M \'e ndez M., van der Klis M., van Paradijs J., 2000, , http://adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2000A

    work page 2000

Show all 55 references
  1. [9]

    Belloni T., M \'e ndez M., S \'a nchez-Fern \'a ndez C., 2001, @doi [ ] 10.1051/0004-6361:20010480 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2001A&A...372..551B 372, 551

    2001 doi

  2. [10]

    Belloni T., Soleri P., Casella P., M \'e ndez M., Migliari S., 2006, @doi [ ] 10.1111/j.1365-2966.2006.10286.x , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2006MNRAS.369..305B 369, 305

    2006

  3. [11]

    M., Bhattacharya D., Caccese P., Bhalerao V., Vadawale S., Yadav J

    Belloni T. M., Bhattacharya D., Caccese P., Bhalerao V., Vadawale S., Yadav J. S., 2019, @doi [ ] 10.1093/mnras/stz2143 , 489, 1037

    2019 doi

  4. [12]

    G., 1995, @doi [ ] 10.1086/176610 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/1995ApJ...455..623C 455, 623

    Chakrabarti S., Titarchuk L. G., 1995, @doi [ ] 10.1086/176610 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/1995ApJ...455..623C 455, 623

    1995 doi

  5. [13]

    K., Nandi A., Chatterjee A

    Chakrabarti S. K., Nandi A., Chatterjee A. K., Choudhury A. K., Chatterjee U., 2005, @doi [ ] 10.1051/0004-6361:20041662 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2005A&A...431..825C 431, 825

    2005 doi

  6. [14]

    Cui W., 1999, @doi [ ] 10.1086/312296 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/1999ApJ...524L..59C 524, L59

    1999 doi

  7. [15]

    N., Chen W., 1998, @doi [ ] 10.1086/311092 , http://adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/1998ApJ...492L..53C 492, L53

    Cui W., Zhang S. N., Chen W., 1998, @doi [ ] 10.1086/311092 , http://adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/1998ApJ...492L..53C 492, L53

    1998 doi

  8. [16]

    Das S., Chattopadhyay I., Nandi A., Molteni D., 2014, @doi [ ] 10.1093/mnras/stu864 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2014MNRAS.442..251D 442, 251

    2014 doi

  9. [17]

    K., 2024, @doi [ ] 10.1093/mnras/stae181 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2024MNRAS.528.3964D 528, 3964

    Debnath S., Chattopadhyay I., Joshi R. K., 2024, @doi [ ] 10.1093/mnras/stae181 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2024MNRAS.528.3964D 528, 3964

    2024 doi

  10. [18]

    S., Jain P., 2023, @doi [ ] 10.1093/mnras/stad2075 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2023MNRAS.524.2721D 524, 2721

    Dhaka R., Misra R., Yadav J. S., Jain P., 2023, @doi [ ] 10.1093/mnras/stad2075 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2023MNRAS.524.2721D 524, 2721

    2023 doi

  11. [19]

    K., Das S., Maity D., Nandi A., 2019, @doi [ ] 10.1093/mnras/stz1933 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2019MNRAS.488.2412D 488, 2412

    Dihingia I. K., Das S., Maity D., Nandi A., 2019, @doi [ ] 10.1093/mnras/stz1933 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2019MNRAS.488.2412D 488, 2412

    2019 doi

  12. [20]

    Ebisawa K., \.Z ycki P., Kubota A., Mizuno T., Watarai K.-y., 2003, @doi [ ] 10.1086/378586 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2003ApJ...597..780E 597, 780

    2003 doi

  13. [22]

    C., et al., 2005, @doi [ ] 10.1051/0004-6361:20042250 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2005A&A...435..995H 435, 995

    Hannikainen D. C., et al., 2005, @doi [ ] 10.1051/0004-6361:20042250 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2005A&A...435..995H 435, 995

    2005 doi

  14. [23]

    Homan J., Wijnands R., van der Klis M., Belloni T., van Paradijs J., Klein-Wolt M., Fender R., M \'e ndez M., 2001, @doi [ ] 10.1086/318954 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2001ApJS..132..377H 132, 377

    2001 doi

  15. [24]

    M., Wijnands R., van der Klis M., Belloni T., Steeghs D., Lewin W

    Homan J., Miller J. M., Wijnands R., van der Klis M., Belloni T., Steeghs D., Lewin W. H. G., 2005, @doi [ ] 10.1086/424994 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2005ApJ...623..383H 623, 383

    2005 doi

  16. [25]

    Huppenkothen D., et al., 2019, @doi [ ] 10.3847/1538-4357/ab258d , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2019ApJ...881...39H 881, 39

    2019 doi

  17. [26]

    Janiuk A., Czerny B., Siemiginowska A., 2000, @doi [ ] 10.1086/312911 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2000ApJ...542L..33J 542, L33

    2000 doi

  18. [27]

    Kato S., 2004, @doi [ ] 10.1093/pasj/56.5.L25 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2004PASJ...56L..25K 56, L25

    2004 doi

  19. [28]

    Kato S., Fukue J., 1980, , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/1980PASJ...32..377K 32, 377

    1980

  20. [29]

    P., Pooley G

    Klein-Wolt M., Fender R. P., Pooley G. G., Belloni T., Migliari S., Morgan E. H., van der Klis M., 2002, @doi [ ] 10.1046/j.1365-8711.2002.05223.x , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2002MNRAS.331..745K 331, 745

    2002

  21. [30]

    Kotrlov \'a A., et al., 2020, @doi [ ] 10.1051/0004-6361/201937097 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2020A&A...643A..31K 643, A31

    2020 doi

  22. [31]

    Majumder S., Sreehari H., Aftab N., Katoch T., Das S., Nandi A., 2022, @doi [ ] 10.1093/mnras/stac615 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2022MNRAS.512.2508M 512, 2508

    2022 doi

  23. [32]

    G., Nandi A., 2024, @doi [ ] 10.1093/mnras/stad3465 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2024MNRAS.527.4739M 527, 4739

    Majumder P., Dutta B. G., Nandi A., 2024, @doi [ ] 10.1093/mnras/stad3465 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2024MNRAS.527.4739M 527, 4739

    2024 doi

  24. [33]

    G., Nandi A., 2025, @doi [ ] 10.1093/mnras/staf698 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2025MNRAS.540...37M 540, 37

    Majumder P., Dutta B. G., Nandi A., 2025, @doi [ ] 10.1093/mnras/staf698 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2025MNRAS.540...37M 540, 37

    2025 doi

  25. [34]

    Merloni A., Vietri M., Stella L., Bini D., 1999, @doi [ ] 10.1046/j.1365-8711.1999.02307.x , http://adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/1999MNRAS.304..155M 304, 155

    1999

  26. [35]

    Migliari S., Belloni T., 2003, @doi [ ] 10.1051/0004-6361:20030484 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2003A&A...404..283M 404, 283

    2003 doi

  27. [37]

    H., Remillard R

    Morgan E. H., Remillard R. A., Greiner J., 1997b, @doi [ ] 10.1086/304191 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/1997ApJ...482..993M 482, 993

    doi

  28. [38]

    Musoke G., Liska M., Porth O., van der Klis M., Ingram A., 2023, @doi [ ] 10.1093/mnras/stac2754 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2023MNRAS.518.1656M 518, 1656

    2023 doi

  29. [39]

    R., Chakrabarti S

    Naik S., Rao A. R., Chakrabarti S. K., 2002, @doi [Journal of Astrophysics and Astronomy] 10.1007/BF02702284 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2002JApA...23..213N 23, 213

    2002 doi

  30. [40]

    G., Rao A

    Nandi A., Manickam S. G., Rao A. R., Chakrabarti S. K., 2001, @doi [ ] 10.1046/j.1365-8711.2001.04339.x , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2001MNRAS.324..267N 324, 267

    2001

  31. [41]

    A., Lee J

    Neilsen J., Remillard R. A., Lee J. C., 2011, @doi [ ] 10.1088/0004-637X/737/2/69 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2011ApJ...737...69N 737, 69

    2011 doi

  32. [43]

    A., Wagoner R

    Nowak M. A., Wagoner R. V., Begelman M. C., Lehr D. E., 1997, @doi [ ] 10.1086/310534 , http://adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/1997ApJ...477L..91N 477, L91

    1997 doi

  33. [44]

    J., McClintock J

    Reid M. J., McClintock J. E., Steiner J. F., Steeghs D., Remillard R. A., Dhawan V., Narayan R., 2014, @doi [ ] 10.1088/0004-637X/796/1/2 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2014ApJ...796....2R 796, 2

    2014 doi

  34. [45]

    A., Morgan E

    Remillard R. A., Morgan E. H., McClintock J. E., Bailyn C. D., Orosz J. A., 1999, @doi [ ] 10.1086/307606 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/1999ApJ...522..397R 522, 397

    1999 doi

  35. [46]

    R., Fabian A

    Ross R. R., Fabian A. C., Brandt W. N., 1996, @doi [ ] 10.1093/mnras/278.4.1082 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/1996MNRAS.278.1082R 278, 1082

    1996 doi

  36. [47]

    P., Stewart G

    Singh K. P., Stewart G. C., Westergaard N. J., Bhattacharayya S., Chandra et al. S., 2017, @doi [Journal of Astrophysics and Astronomy] 10.1007/s12036-017-9448-7 , http://adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2017JApA...38...29S 38, 29

    2017 doi

  37. [48]

    T., Iyer N., Agrawal V

    Sreehari H., Ravishankar B. T., Iyer N., Agrawal V. K., Katoch T. B., Mandal S., Nand i A., 2019, @doi [ ] 10.1093/mnras/stz1327 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2019MNRAS.487..928S 487, 928

    2019 doi

  38. [49]

    K., Mandal S., Ramadevi M

    Sreehari H., Nandi A., Das S., Agrawal V. K., Mandal S., Ramadevi M. C., Katoch T., 2020, @doi [ ] 10.1093/mnras/staa3135 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2020MNRAS.499.5891S 499, 5891

    2020 doi

  39. [50]

    E., 2001, @doi [ ] 10.1086/321720 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2001ApJ...554L.169S 554, L169

    Strohmayer T. E., 2001, @doi [ ] 10.1086/321720 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2001ApJ...554L.169S 554, L169

    2001 doi

  40. [51]

    Sukov \'a P., Janiuk A., 2015, @doi [ ] 10.1093/mnras/stu2544 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2015MNRAS.447.1565S 447, 1565

    2015 doi

  41. [52]

    E., Chen X., Swank J

    Taam R. E., Chen X., Swank J. H., 1997, @doi [ ] 10.1086/310812 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/1997ApJ...485L..83T 485, L83

    1997 doi

  42. [53]

    Titarchuk L., Seifina E., 2009, @doi [ ] 10.1088/0004-637X/706/2/1463 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2009ApJ...706.1463T 706, 1463

    2009 doi

  43. [54]

    Vilhu O., Nevalainen J., 1998, @doi [ ] 10.1086/311709 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/1998ApJ...508L..85V 508, L85

    1998 doi

  44. [55]

    Vilhu O., Poutanen J., Nikula P., Nevalainen J., 2001, @doi [ ] 10.1086/320489 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2001ApJ...553L..51V 553, L51

    2001 doi

  45. [56]

    M., et al., 2023, @doi [ ] 10.1038/s41586-022-05648-3 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2023Natur.615...45V 615, 45

    Vincentelli F. M., et al., 2023, @doi [ ] 10.1038/s41586-022-05648-3 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2023Natur.615...45V 615, 45

    2023 doi

  46. [57]

    A., 2014, @doi [ ] 10.1093/mnras/stu1525 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2014MNRAS.444.1113Z 444, 1113

    Zdziarski A. A., 2014, @doi [ ] 10.1093/mnras/stu1525 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2014MNRAS.444.1113Z 444, 1113

    2014 doi

  47. [58]

    A., Gierli \'n ski M., Rao A

    Zdziarski A. A., Gierli \'n ski M., Rao A. R., Vadawale S. V., Miko ajewska J., 2005, @doi [ ] 10.1111/j.1365-2966.2005.09112.x , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2005MNRAS.360..825Z 360, 825

    2005

Pith tools

Reviewed August 7, 2026 · model on record in the stance chip above.