Pith. sign in

REVIEW 3 major objections 5 minor 31 references

A scaling limit for Vlasov equations with electrostatic fluctuations

T0 review · 3 major / 5 minor · reviewed 2026-08-06 · deepseek-v4-flash

Challenge this review Re-run · record.json Download PDF Read on arXiv ↗

Pith's one-line read Fine-scale electrostatic fluctuations of fixed variance produce a deterministic velocity diffusion term in the limiting Vlasov equation.

desk verdict Solid new scaling-limit theorem for stochastic Vlasov with gradient noise; the main proof holds up, but the blob construction's Lemma 5.7 overclaims exact equality of Q_N(0) and needs a one-line fix. read the letter →

arxiv 2507.09922 v1 pith:WDFXHJCV submitted 2025-07-14 math.PR math.AP

Franco Flandoli , Dejun Luo This is my paper · ORCID
classification math.PRmath.AP MSC 60H1535Q8382D10
keywords Vlasovequationplasmaelectrostaticfluctuationtransportnoisescalinglimitvelocitydiffusionstochastic
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal

The pith

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The reading

This paper studies a Vlasov equation — the kinetic equation for the plasma particle density $f(x,v,t)$ in a constant magnetic field — with a random electrostatic field added as transport noise in velocity, written in the Stratonovich convention. Its central claim is a scaling limit: when the noise is built from increasingly small-scale electrostatic fluctuations whose spatial covariance keeps a fixed, isotropic value at zero lag while its correlation length goes to zero, the random fluctuations do not average out or survive as a stochastic term in the limit. Instead, they generate a deterministic velocity-space Laplacian, so the limiting equation is the Vlasov equation plus a diffusion term $\kappa \Delta_v \bar f$ in velocity. The authors prove this for weak solutions starting from $L^1 \cap L^3$ initial data with finite kinetic energy, and give a physical construction of the noise from random blob-like density fluctuations. The result matters because it provides a rigorous mechanism by which small-scale plasma turbulence can act as a surrogate for collisions, producing velocity diffusion without any collisional operator.

What carries the argument

The argument runs on the Itô–Stratonovich corrector: writing the noise in Stratonovich form and converting to Itô form produces the Laplacian $\kappa \Delta_v f$, an operator the authors call a fake dissipation because for finite $N$ it is exactly cancelled by the martingale part in the energy balance. Under the scaling condition (1.6) the martingale term has second moment bounded by a constant times $\|Q_N\|_{L^{7/4}}$, which tends to zero, while the corrector survives unchanged. The noise construction in Section 5 is Gaussian but physically motivated by random blob-like density fluctuations; its covariance is $Q_N(x-y) = 2\tau\sigma_N^2 \sum_k \chi_N^2(k)|k|^{-2} (k\otimes k/|k|^2) e^{2\pi i k\cdot(x-y)}$, with $\chi_N^2(k)$ an averaged Fourier weight of the blob shape. The decisive tuning is $\sigma_N^2$ taken inversely proportional to the divergent sum $\sum \chi_N^2(k)/|k|^2$, which gives $Q_N(0) \to \frac{1}{3}\tau k_T^2 I_3$ and hence condition (1.6) with $\kappa = \frac{1}{6}\tau k_T^2$.

What would settle it

A direct check is to run the stochastic Vlasov equation (1.7) with the explicit noise of Example 2.4 or Section 5.3 for increasing $N$ and compare the velocity marginal with the solution of (1.4) using the value of $\kappa$ fixed by $Q_N(0)$; the theorem predicts the distance in $C([0,T], H^{-\varepsilon}_{x,v,\mathrm{loc}})$ goes to zero as $N\to\infty$. An even more specific calculation is the bound $E\bar M_t^2 \le C\,\|Q_N\|_{L^{7/4}}$, which the proof uses to kill the martingale: evaluating this second moment for a concrete family with $Q_N(0)=2\kappa I_3$ either confirms the vanishing rate or reveals a surviving stochastic term, refuting the claimed limit.

Watch

Extended reading notes

Core claim

The paper establishes two theorems. Theorem 1.1 shows that the stochastic Vlasov equation (1.3), with transport noise of gradient type in space and divergence-free in velocity, admits weak solutions for initial data $f_0 \in (L^1 \cap L^3)(\mathbb{T}^3 \times \mathbb{R}^3)$ with finite kinetic energy; the solutions preserve $L^p$ bounds and have bounded moments of kinetic energy. Theorem 1.2 is the scaling limit: for any sequence of smooth noises whose covariance functions $Q_N$ satisfy $Q_N(0)=2\kappa I_3$ for every $N$ and $\|Q_N\|_{L^r} \to 0$ for every $r \in [1,\infty)$, any convergent subsequence of weak solutions of the stochastic equation converges, in $C([0,T], H^{-\varepsilon}_{x,v,\mathrm{loc}})$, to weak solutions of the deterministic Vlasov equation with velocity diffusion $\partial_t \bar f + v\cdot\nabla_x \bar f + (E_{\bar\rho}+B v \times e_3)\cdot\nabla_v \bar f = \kappa \Delta_v \bar f$. The diffusion coefficient is exactly the fixed zero-lag covariance of the fluctuations, so the pointwise variance of the random electric field determines the limiting transport coefficient while the vanishing of $\|Q_N\|_{L^r}$ removes the martingale term.

Load-bearing premise

The load-bearing premise is that every approximating noise keeps exactly the same isotropic pointwise variance $Q_N(0)=2\kappa I_3$ while its spatial correlation length shrinks to zero; the physical construction of Section 5.3 realizes this only by tuning the blob intensity $\sigma_N^2$ against a divergent spectral sum, and if that balance is broken the limiting diffusion coefficient changes or disappears.

Editorial extensions

If this is right

  • If the central claim is right, the averaged description of a plasma under fine-scale electrostatic fluctuations is the deterministic Vlasov equation with velocity diffusion $\kappa \Delta_v \bar f$; fine-scale turbulence acts like an effective collision term.
  • The diffusion coefficient is fixed by the pointwise variance of the fluctuations ($Q_N(0)=2\kappa I_3$) rather than by the detailed shape of the density blobs, provided the spectral mass spreads to ever higher frequencies; this is a concrete, parameter-free prediction for the turbulent transport coefficient.
  • The convergence is only along subsequences because uniqueness of weak solutions to (1.4) is open; establishing uniqueness would upgrade the statement to convergence of the whole sequence.
  • In the limit, the total mechanical energy evolves as $d/dt(K(\bar f)+V(\bar f))=6\kappa\|\bar f\|_{L^1}$, so the mean kinetic energy grows linearly in time with rate set by $\kappa$ — a quantitative signature observable in particle or field simulations.

Reading between the lines

Editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • Beyond the paper, the same Itô–Stratonovich mechanism should produce velocity diffusion for other kinetic equations with velocity-space transport noise, such as Vlasov–Poisson without the imposed magnetic field, since the proof only needs the velocity-space divergence-free structure and the fixed zero-lag covariance.
  • Beyond the paper, the construction suggests a measurement recipe for kinetic plasma simulations: hold the pointwise electric-field variance fixed while shrinking the correlation length, and the measured velocity-space diffusion coefficient should approach the value set by $Q_N(0)$, independent of the blob profile.
  • Beyond the paper, the open uniqueness question for (1.4) leaves room for selection effects: different subsequences of the same noise family could in principle converge to different weak limits, so it would be informative to search for examples of non-uniqueness or for a uniqueness proof under stronger regularity.
  • Beyond the paper, the diffusive equation provides a rigorous starting point for the statistical-mechanics question of whether turbulence can replace collisions in driving a collisionless plasma toward equilibrium; whether those equilibria are Maxwellian or belong to the non-Maxwellian spectra discussed in the turbulence literature is left open here.
Share X Bluesky LinkedIn Reddit HN

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, and a circularity audit.

Referee Report

3 major / 5 minor

Summary. The manuscript studies a Vlasov-type equation on T^3 × R^3 with a constant magnetic field, perturbed by a Stratonovich transport noise whose spatial part is a gradient field modelling electrostatic fluctuations. Theorem 1.1 states weak existence for the stochastic equation under L1 ∩ L3 initial data with finite kinetic energy, using a regularized Green function, a stochastic-flow representation, energy/potential estimates, and a tightness argument. Theorem 1.2 then states that, for any sequence of smooth noises whose covariance Q_N satisfies Q_N(0) = 2κ I_3 for every N and ||Q_N||_{L^r} → 0, every convergent subsequence of weak solutions converges in C([0,T], H^{-ε}_{x,v,loc}) to a weak solution of the deterministic Vlasov equation with an added κ Δ_v term. Section 5 provides a physical motivation based on random density blobs and a Donsker-type argument, and attempts to construct noises satisfying (1.6). The central conditional statement is plausible and the estimates in Sections 3 and 4 are coherent, but the physical construction in Section 5.3 has a normalization gap: Lemma 5.7 only establishes a limit for Q_N(0), not the exact equality required by (1.6).

Significance. If Theorem 1.2 holds, it is a useful addition to the Itô–Stratonovich scaling-limit literature and a rigorous illustration of how small-scale electrostatic fluctuations can generate velocity diffusion in a Vlasov plasma. The proof has real strengths: the energy identity (3.7), the uniform L^p and kinetic-energy bounds, and the martingale-vanishing estimate in Section 4 are explicit and convincing, and Example 2.4 gives a simple Fourier noise that satisfies the theorem's hypothesis exactly. The main caveat is that κ is not an emergent coefficient: it is prescribed by the zero-lag covariance condition Q_N(0) = 2κ I_3, and in the physical blob model it appears only at a critical reciprocal scaling between blob intensity and the divergent spectral sum. The paper is therefore stronger as a conditional rigorous result than as a demonstration that diffusion appears generically from electrostatic fluctuations.

major comments (3)
  1. [Section 5.3, Lemma 5.7] Lemma 5.7 asserts that the covariance Q_N constructed from blob perturbations satisfies condition (1.6) under the assumption of Lemma 5.5. However, Lemma 5.5 proves only the limit Q_N(0) -> (1/3)τ k_T^2 I_3 as N -> ∞; condition (1.6) requires the exact equality Q_N(0) = 2κ I_3 for every N. The gap can be closed by choosing σ_N^2 = 6κ/(τ ∑_{k∈Z_0^3} χ_N^2(k)/|k|^2), with k_T^2 = 3κ/τ, but this normalization is not stated. As written, the physical noise of Section 5.3 cannot be substituted into Theorem 1.2, so the advertised physical conclusion depends on the reader supplying a tuning that is absent from the text.
  2. [Abstract and Section 1.2, Theorem 1.2] The paper presents κ Δ_v as something that 'emerges' from electrostatic fluctuations. Under condition (1.6), κ is exactly the coefficient fixed by Q_N(0) = 2κ I_3; it is not a limit extracted from otherwise generic data. Moreover, the construction in Section 5.3 makes κ a critical-scaling parameter: if σ_N^2 is proportional to the reciprocal of the divergent spectral sum with any exponent different from one, Q_N(0) tends to 0 or ∞ and the limiting equation changes qualitatively. The interpretation in the abstract and Section 5.4 should therefore be qualified: the result proves diffusion for a specific critical family of noises, not for generic electrostatic fluctuations.
  3. [Section 3, around (3.12), and Section 4] The proof of Theorem 1.1 delegates the joint tightness of the densities and Brownian motions to an omitted argument (cf. [10, Section 2]), and the proof of Theorem 1.2 delegates the convergence of all non-martingale terms to 'Section 2' (which actually contains only preparatory lemmas). These are standard arguments in this literature, but they are load-bearing for the weak formulations, which contain stochastic integrals. The authors should either include the details or give a precise statement of which theorem in [10] is being used.
minor comments (5)
  1. [Section 3.2, Lemma 3.6] In the estimate of the stochastic term I4, the displayed Fourier transform is written as F(Eρδr · ∇v fδr), but the term being estimated is σk · ∇v fδr; this typo makes the argument hard to follow.
  2. [Section 4, martingale argument] The notation \bar M_t is used for the martingale part of the N-th equation, although it is not the limit; using M^N_t would be clearer.
  3. [Section 5.2] The background density and the total density both use the symbol ρ, and the time-discretized perturbation is written with an undefined sequence ρ_n; the heuristic section would benefit from explicit notational separation.
  4. [Remark 4.1 and abstract] The abstract's 'diffusion emerges' should be accompanied by an explicit 'along subsequences' qualifier, since Remark 4.1 notes that uniqueness of (1.4) is open.
  5. [Section 5.3, Lemma 5.5] The proof uses θ^T_ℓ(k) and bθ without defining the Fourier transform convention; a short sentence on this would help the reader verify the factor in (5.3).

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged · score 2.0 of 10

No significant circularity: the scaling-limit proof is self-contained, the limiting diffusion coefficient is prescribed by hypothesis rather than derived, and the Section 5.3 exact-normalization gap is a fixable correctness issue, not a circular step.

full rationale

The central result (Theorem 1.2) is a conditional scaling limit, not a circular derivation. Hypothesis (1.6) fixes Q_N(0)=2kappa I_3 for every N; the approximating Ito equations (1.7) therefore contain the fixed corrector kappa Delta_v f^N from the start. Section 4 proves that the stochastic martingale term vanishes via the Ito isometry together with ||Q_N||_{L^r} to 0, while the deterministic transport terms and the corrector pass to the limit. Thus the limiting kappa is exactly the prescribed input kappa; the paper does not claim to derive kappa from first principles, and the theorem's content is the convergence of the nonlinear Vlasov dynamics to the viscous limit, established by the estimates in Sections 3-4. The existence result Theorem 1.1 is proved self-containedly in Section 3 using regularization, energy evolution, tightness, and Skorohod representation. The earlier Ito-Stratonovich works [10,11,16,25] and the identity cited from [13, (2.3)] are motivational or technical; the load-bearing estimates (Horst-Hunze lemmas, Ito isometry, compactness) are external or proved in the text. The only noteworthy issue is a gap in Section 5.3: Lemma 5.7 asserts condition (1.6) from Lemma 5.5, but Lemma 5.5 yields only Q_N(0) to (1/3) tau k_T^2 I_3; exact equality for every N would require the explicit normalization sigma_N^2 = 3 kappa / (tau sum chi_N^2/|k|^2), which is not stated. This is a fixable completeness error, not a circular step. Remark 4.1's non-uniqueness is an acknowledged limitation, not a circularity.

Assumptions & free parameters 1 free parameters · 6 assumptions · 0 invented entities

No data fitting is present; the only parameter, kappa, is prescribed by the noise covariance and not estimated from experiments. The paper introduces a stochastic forcing model and a random-blob ansatz, but no new particles, forces, or unobserved physical entities.

free parameters (1)
  • kappa = positive constant, left unspecified
    The isotropic noise intensity QN(0)=2 kappa I3 in eq (1.6) becomes the velocity diffusion coefficient in the limit (1.4). It is an input parameter of the noise model, not fitted to data; in Section 5.3 it is written as kappa = tau k_T^2 / 6, where k_T^2 is assumed to exist as a positive finite limit.
assumptions (6)
  • standard math Stratonovich transport noise with Q(0)=2 kappa I3 has Ito form with the fake dissipation kappa Delta_v f dt (Wong-Zakai and Ito-Stratonovich correction).
    Used to write (1.3) and to make the diffusion survive the scaling limit; see the paragraph after (1.1) and eq (1.3).
  • standard math Smooth regularized Green kernel G_delta admits a stochastic flow of diffeomorphisms with measure preservation.
    Invoked in Proposition 3.1, relying on [23] and [8]; used in the energy identity (3.7).
  • domain assumption The a priori estimates require f0 in L1 intersect L3 with finite kinetic energy plus uniform potential energy bounds in (3.4).
    The L3 condition is used in Lemma 3.6 and in the convergence of the nonlinear Vlasov term through Horst-Hunze Lemmas 2.1 to 2.3.
  • domain assumption The limit equation (1.4) is assumed to have at least one weak solution in the given regularity class, but uniqueness is not assumed or proved.
    Explicitly admitted after Theorem 1.2 and in Remark 4.1; this limits the conclusion to subsequential convergence.
  • ad hoc to paper Physical modeling: density perturbations are decomposed into a slowly varying part plus fast blob perturbations R_n theta_{L_n}(.-X_n) with independent, uniformly distributed centers, and the accumulated field is approximated by sqrt(tau) partial_t W via Donsker.
    Section 5.2 labels this heuristic; it motivates the noise class but is not part of Theorem 1.2.
  • domain assumption Scaling condition (1.6): QN(0)=2 kappa I3 for all N and ||QN||_{L^r} tends to 0.
    This is the exact mechanism that makes the martingale vanish while diffusion remains; physically it requires tuning sigma_N^2 against a divergent spectral sum, as shown in Lemma 5.7.

how reviews work

0 comments
Cite this review

Pith. "Pith review of A scaling limit for Vlasov equations with electrostatic fluctuations." pith.science (2026). https://pith.science/paper/WDFXHJCV

@misc{pith2026250709922,
  author       = {Pith},
  title        = {Pith review of: A scaling limit for Vlasov equations with electrostatic fluctuations},
  year         = {2026},
  howpublished = {\url{https://pith.science/paper/WDFXHJCV}},
  note         = {Machine review of arXiv:2507.09922}
}
read the original abstract

We consider a Vlasov equation for a plasma with a given constant magnetic field, and introduce a white noise perturbation of the electric field in the electrostatic approximation, with a discussion of the motivations of such random perturbation. We prove that diffusion in velocity emerges in a suitable scaling limit of the noise, and also discuss the physical relevance of this result.

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

31 extracted references · 28 canonical work pages

  1. [10]

    Flandoli, L

    F. Flandoli, L. Galeati, D. Luo. Scaling limit of stochastic 2D Euler equations with trans- port noises to the deterministic Navier-Stokes equations. J. Evol. Equ. 21 (2021), no. 1, 567–600. 25

    work page 2021

  2. [1]

    A. Agresti. Delayed blow-up and enhanced diffusion by transport noise for systems of reaction-diffusion equations. Stoch. Partial Differ. Equ. Anal. Comput. 12 (2024), no. 3, 1907–1981

    work page 2024

  3. [2]

    Bardos, N

    C. Bardos, N. Besse. Diffusion limit of the Vlasov equation in the weak turbulent regime. J. Math. Phys. 62 (2021), no. 10, Paper No. 101505, 36 pp

    work page 2021

  4. [3]

    Bodineau, I

    T. Bodineau, I. Gallagher, L. Saint-Raymond. The Brownian motion as the limit of a deterministic system of hard-spheres. Invent. Math. 203 (2016), 493–553

    work page 2016

  5. [4]

    Brze´ zniak, F

    Z. Brze´ zniak, F. Flandoli. Almost sure approximation of Wong–Zakai type for stochastic partial differential equations. Stochastic Process. Appl. 55 (1995), no. 2, 329–358

    work page 1995

  6. [5]

    Butori, F

    F. Butori, F. Flandoli, E. Luongo. On the Itˆ o-Stratonovich Diffusion Limit for the Mag- netic Field in a 3D Thin Domain, arXiv:2401.15701

    arXiv

  7. [6]

    Butori, E

    F. Butori, E. Luongo. Mean-Field Magnetohydrodynamics Models as Scaling Limits of Stochastic Induction Equations. arXiv:2406.07206

    arXiv

  8. [7]

    Carigi, E

    G. Carigi, E. Luongo. Dissipation properties of transport noise in the two-layer quasi- geostrophic model. J. Math. Fluid Mech. 25 (2023), no. 2, Paper No. 28, 27 pp

    work page 2023

Show all 31 references
  1. [8]

    Coghi, F

    M. Coghi, F. Flandoli, Propagation of chaos for interacting particles subject to environ- mental noise. Ann. Appl. Probab. 26 (2016), no. 3, 1407–1442

    2016

  2. [9]

    R. J. Ewart, M. L. Nastac, P. J. Bilbao, A. A. Schekochihin. Relaxation to universal non- Maxwellian equilibria in a collisionless plasma. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 122 (2025), no. 17, Paper No. e2417813122

    2025

  3. [11]

    Flandoli, L

    F. Flandoli, L. Galeati, D. Luo. Eddy heat exchange at the boundary under white noise turbulence. Philos. Trans. Roy. Soc. A 380 (2022), no. 2219, Paper No. 20210096, 13 pp

    2022

  4. [12]

    Flandoli, L

    F. Flandoli, L. Galeati, D. Luo. Quantitative convergence rates for scaling limit of SPDEs with transport noise. J. Differential Equations 394 (2024), 237–277

    2024

  5. [13]

    Flandoli, D

    F. Flandoli, D. Luo. High mode transport noise improves vorticity blow-up control in 3D Navier-Stokes equations. Probab. Theory Related Fields 180 (2021), no. 1–2, 309–363

    2021

  6. [14]

    Flandoli, D

    F. Flandoli, D. Luo. On the Boussinesq hypothesis for a stochastic Proudman-Taylor model. SIAM J. Math. Anal. 56 (2024), no. 3, 3886–3923

    2024

  7. [15]

    Flandoli, E

    F. Flandoli, E. Luongo. Stochastic partial differential equations in fluid mechanics. Lecture Notes in Mathematics, 2330. Springer, Singapore, 2023

    2023

  8. [16]

    L. Galeati. On the convergence of stochastic transport equations to a deterministic parabolic one. Stoch. Partial Differ. Equ. Anal. Comput. 8 (2020), no. 4, 833–868

    2020

  9. [17]

    Horst, On the classical solutions of the initial value problem for the unmodified nonlinear Vlasov equation

    E. Horst, On the classical solutions of the initial value problem for the unmodified nonlinear Vlasov equation. I. General theory. Math. Methods Appl. Sci. 3 (1981), no. 2, 229–248

    1981

  10. [18]

    Horst, On the classical solutions of the initial value problem for the unmodified nonlinear Vlasov equation

    E. Horst, On the classical solutions of the initial value problem for the unmodified nonlinear Vlasov equation. II. Special cases. Math. Methods Appl. Sci. 4 (1982), no. 1, 19–32

    1982

  11. [19]

    Horst, R

    E. Horst, R. Hunze, Weak solutions of the initial value problem for the unmodified non- linear Vlasov equation. Math. Methods Appl. Sci. 6 (1984), no. 2, 262–279

    1984

  12. [20]

    W. Huang. Scaling limits of stochastic transport equations on manifolds. Stoch. Partial Differ. Equ. Anal. Comput. (2025). https://doi.org/10.1007/s40072-025-00362-3

    2025 doi

  13. [21]

    I. H. Hutchinson. Electron holes in phase space: What they are and why they matter. Phys. Plasmas 24 (2017), no. 5, Paper No. 055601

    2017

  14. [22]

    I. H. Hutchinson. Kinetic solitary electrostatic structures in collisionless plasma: Phase- space holes. Rev. Mod. Phys. 96 (2024), no. 4, Paper No. 045007

    2024

  15. [23]

    H. Kunita. Stochastic flows and stochastic differential equations. Vol. 24, Cambridge Uni- versity Press, 1997

    1997

  16. [24]

    C. Liu, D. Luo. Scaling Limit and Large Deviation for 3D Globally Modified Stochastic Navier-Stokes Equations with Transport Noise. arXiv:2412.20752

    arXiv

  17. [25]

    D. Luo. Convergence of stochastic 2D inviscid Boussinesq equations with transport noise to a deterministic viscous system. Nonlinearity 34 (2021), no. 12, 8311–8330

    2021

  18. [26]

    D. Luo, B. Xie, G. Zhao. Quantitative estimates for SPDEs on the full space with transport noise and Lp-initial data. Siam J. Math. Anal. (2025), accepted, see arXiv:2410.21855

    2025 arXiv

  19. [27]

    M. L. Nastac, R. J. Ewart, J. Juno, M. Barnes, A. A. Schekochihin. Universal fluctuation spectrum of Vlasov-Poisson turbulence. arXiv:2503.17278

    arXiv

  20. [28]

    Z. Qiu, C. Sun. Stochastic Landau-Lifshitz-Bloch equation with transport noise: well- posedness, dissipation enhancement. J. Stat. Phys. 191 (2024), no. 4, Paper No. 43, 29 pp

    2024

  21. [29]

    S. Serfaty. Mean field limit for Coulomb-type flows. Duke Math. J. 169 (2020), 2887–2935

    2020

  22. [30]

    Simon, Compact sets in the space Lp(0, T; B)

    J. Simon, Compact sets in the space Lp(0, T; B). Ann. Mat. Pura Appl. 146 (1987), 65–96

    1987

  23. [31]

    Zhang, J

    J. Zhang, J. Huang. Convergence rates and central limit theorem for 3-D stochastic frac- tional Boussinesq equations with transport noise. Phys. D 470 (2024), part A, Paper No. 134406, 18 pp. 26

    2024

Pith tools

Reviewed August 6, 2026 · model on record in the stance chip above.