pith. sign in

arxiv: 2603.13845 · v2 · pith:WH3PW3M6new · submitted 2026-03-14 · ⚛️ physics.optics

Optical Resonances: From Eigenmodes to Scattering Features

Ilya Karavaev , Kirill Koshelev , Andrey Bogdanov This is my paper

Pith reviewed 2026-05-15 11:47 UTC · model grok-4.3

classification ⚛️ physics.optics
keywords electromagnetic resonanceseigenmodesscattering featuresnanophotonicsbound states in the continuumanapoleslattice resonancesmetasurfaces
0
0 comments X

The pith

Electromagnetic resonances are distinguished as eigenmodes of open systems from their scattering manifestations in experiments.

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

This Perspective proposes a unified framework for electromagnetic resonances by separating their nature as eigenmodes of open systems from the scattering features observed in experiments. This matters because many phenomena in nanophotonics arise from interference among multiple channels rather than single mode excitation, leading to effects like bound states in the continuum that are hard to interpret without the distinction. The framework traces how resonances change from single particles to oligomers and periodic structures, showing the influence of geometry, materials, and dimensionality. A sympathetic reader cares because it creates a shared language that replaces platform-specific concepts in plasmonics, photonic crystals, and metasurfaces, aiding the design of efficient light-confining structures.

Core claim

The paper claims that electromagnetic resonances should be understood as eigenmodes of open systems, distinct from their experimental appearances as scattering features. Resonances evolve from isolated particles to coupled oligomers and periodic structures, with roles played by geometry, material response, and dimensionality. Particular attention is paid to interference-driven phenomena such as bound states in the continuum, lattice resonances, anapoles, and superscattering, which cannot always be linked to a single eigenmode. By clarifying the relationship between eigenmodes, scattering channels, and interference effects, the framework offers a coherent language for resonant phenomena and 1

What carries the argument

The distinction between eigenmodes of open systems and scattering features, serving to unify descriptions of resonant behavior across nanophotonic platforms.

Load-bearing premise

That distinguishing eigenmodes of open systems from scattering features creates a coherent and applicable language across all nanophotonic platforms without losing key insights.

What would settle it

An experimental observation of a strong resonance peak whose frequency and width cannot be matched to any calculated eigenmode pole in the scattering matrix would challenge the framework.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2603.13845 by Andrey Bogdanov, Ilya Karavaev, Kirill Koshelev.

Figure 1
Figure 1. Figure 1: Classification of electromagnetic resonances and scattering ef [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p011_1.png] view at source ↗
Figure 2
Figure 2. Figure 2: Approaches to resonance excitation and characterization. [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p012_2.png] view at source ↗
Figure 3
Figure 3. Figure 3: Fabrication and measurement back-action on observable reso [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p013_3.png] view at source ↗
read the original abstract

Electromagnetic resonances play a central role in nanophotonics by enabling efficient confinement of electromagnetic energy and enhanced light-matter interaction. Traditionally, resonant phenomena have been described using platform-specific concepts developed within distinct research communities, including photonic crystals, plasmonics, and dielectric metasurfaces. In this Perspective, we propose a unified framework that distinguishes electromagnetic resonances as eigenmodes of open systems from their experimentally observed manifestations as scattering features. We show how resonances evolve from isolated particles to coupled oligomers and periodic structures, highlighting the roles of geometry, material response, and dimensionality. Particular attention is given to interference-driven phenomena such as bound states in the continuum, lattice resonances, anapoles, and superscattering, some of which cannot always be associated with a single eigenmode. By clarifying the relationship between eigenmodes, scattering channels, and interference effects, this Perspective provides a coherent language for interpreting resonant phenomena and identifies key challenges and opportunities for designing robust resonant photonic systems.

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, simulated authors' rebuttal, and a circularity audit. Tearing a paper down is the easy half of reading it; the pith above is the substance, this is the friction.

Referee Report

0 major / 2 minor

Summary. The manuscript is a Perspective proposing a unified framework for electromagnetic resonances in nanophotonics. It distinguishes resonances as eigenmodes of open systems from their experimentally observed manifestations as scattering features. The work traces the evolution of resonances from isolated particles through coupled oligomers to periodic structures, emphasizing geometry, material response, and dimensionality. It examines interference-driven effects including bound states in the continuum, lattice resonances, anapoles, and superscattering, noting that some phenomena cannot be tied to a single eigenmode. The central aim is to supply a coherent language across platforms (photonic crystals, plasmonics, dielectric metasurfaces) and to outline design challenges and opportunities.

Significance. If the proposed distinction proves robust, the Perspective offers a valuable synthesis that could reduce platform-specific fragmentation in nanophotonics. By clarifying relationships among eigenmodes, scattering channels, and interference, it may facilitate more consistent interpretation of resonant phenomena and guide the design of robust photonic systems. As a conceptual contribution without new derivations, data, or falsifiable predictions, its significance rests on adoption rather than immediate technical impact; the absence of machine-checked proofs or reproducible code is consistent with the Perspective format.

minor comments (2)
  1. [Abstract] The abstract states that the framework 'identifies key challenges and opportunities' but does not enumerate them; a brief explicit list in the final paragraph would strengthen the closing.
  2. [Figures] Figure captions (where present) could more consistently reference the eigenmode-versus-scattering-feature distinction to reinforce the central narrative.

Simulated Author's Rebuttal

0 responses · 0 unresolved

We thank the referee for their positive evaluation of the manuscript and the recommendation to accept. The report contains no major comments.

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged

No significant circularity in conceptual perspective

full rationale

The manuscript is a Perspective article proposing a conceptual distinction between eigenmodes of open systems and observed scattering features. It contains no derivations, equations, fitted parameters, or new predictions. The central claim is a synthesis of established literature across nanophotonics platforms, with no load-bearing steps that reduce by construction to self-citations, definitions, or inputs. All references to prior work serve as external context rather than unverified self-referential justification.

Axiom & Free-Parameter Ledger

0 free parameters · 0 axioms · 0 invented entities

The paper is a conceptual perspective without introducing new mathematical parameters, axioms, or entities; it relies on existing concepts in the field.

pith-pipeline@v0.9.0 · 5462 in / 1090 out tokens · 54710 ms · 2026-05-15T11:47:53.163464+00:00 · methodology

discussion (0)

Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.

Lean theorems connected to this paper

Citations machine-checked in the Pith Canon. Every link opens the source theorem in the public Lean library.

What do these tags mean?
matches
The paper's claim is directly supported by a theorem in the formal canon.
supports
The theorem supports part of the paper's argument, but the paper may add assumptions or extra steps.
extends
The paper goes beyond the formal theorem; the theorem is a base layer rather than the whole result.
uses
The paper appears to rely on the theorem as machinery.
contradicts
The paper's claim conflicts with a theorem or certificate in the canon.
unclear
Pith found a possible connection, but the passage is too broad, indirect, or ambiguous to say the theorem truly supports the claim.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

63 extracted references · 63 canonical work pages

  1. [1]

    Both, S., and Weiss, T. (2021). Resonant states and their role in nanophotonics. Semicond. Sci. Tech.37, 013002. doi:10.1088/1361-6641/ac3290

    work page doi:10.1088/1361-6641/ac3290 2021

  2. [2]

    Koshelev, K., and Kivshar, Y . (2021). Dielectric Resonant Metaphotonics. ACS Photonics8, 102–112. doi:10.1021/acsphotonics.0c01315

    work page doi:10.1021/acsphotonics.0c01315 2021

  3. [3]

    Y ang, S.C., Kobori, H., He, C.L., Lin, M.H., Chen, H.Y ., Li, C., Kanehara, M., Teranishi, T., and Gwo, S. (2010). Plasmon hybridization in individual gold nanocrystal dimers: direct observation of bright and dark modes. Nano Lett.10, 632–637

    work page 2010

  4. [4]

    Luk’Y anchuk, B., Zheludev, N.I., Maier, S.A., Halas, N.J., Nordlander, P ., Giessen, H., and Chong, C.T. (2010). The fano resonance in plasmonic nanostructures and metamaterials. Nat. Mater9, 707–715

    work page 2010

  5. [5]

    Magnusson, R., and Ko, Y .H. (2016). Guided-mode resonance nanophotonics: fundamen- tals and applications. In Nanoengineering: fabrication, properties, optics, and devices XIII vol. 9927. SPIE pp. 992702

    work page 2016

  6. [6]

    Evlyukhin, A.B., Reinhardt, C., Seidel, A., Luk’yanchuk, B.S., and Chichkov, B.N. (2010). Optical response features of si-nanoparticle arrays. Phys. Rev. B82, 045404

    work page 2010

  7. [7]

    Koshelev, K.L., Sadrieva, Z.F ., Shcherbakov, A.A., Kivshar, Y .S., and Bogdanov, A.A. (2023). Bound states in the continuum in photonic structures. Phys.-Usp93, 528–553

    work page 2023

  8. [8]

    Maiman, T.H. (1960). Stimulated Optical Radiation in Ruby. Nature187, 493–494. URL: https://www.nature.com/articles/187493a0. doi:10.1038/187493a0

    work page doi:10.1038/187493a0 1960

  9. [9]

    Kogelnik, H., and Shank, C.V. (1971). Stimulated Emission in a Periodic Structure. Appl. Phys. Lett.18, 152–154. doi:10.1063/1.1653605

    work page doi:10.1063/1.1653605 1971

  10. [10]

    Kazarinov, R.F ., Sokolova, Z.N., and Suris, R.A. (1976). Theory of plane optical resonators with distributed feedback. Zh. Tekh. Fiz.46, 229–239

    work page 1976

  11. [11]

    Sakoda, K. (1995). Optical transmittance of a two-dimensional triangular photonic lattice. Phys. Rev. B51, 4672–4675. URL:https://link.aps.org/doi/10.1103/PhysRevB.51

    work page doi:10.1103/physrevb.51 1995

  12. [12]

    doi:10.1103/PhysRevB.51.4672

    work page doi:10.1103/physrevb.51.4672

  13. [13]

    Tikhodeev, S.G., Y ablonskii, A.L., Muljarov, E.A., Gippius, N.A., and Ishihara, T. (2002). Quasiguided modes and optical properties of photonic crystal slabs. Phys. Rev. B66, 045102. URL:https://link.aps.org/doi/10.1103/PhysRevB.66.045102. doi:10.1103/ PhysRevB.66.045102

    work page doi:10.1103/physrevb.66.045102 2002

  14. [14]

    Maier, S.A., Brongersma, M.L., Kik, P .G., Meltzer, S., Requicha, A.a.G., and Atwater, H.A. (2001). Plasmonics—A Route to Nanoscale Optical Devices. Adv. Mater.13, 1501–1505. URL:https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/abs/10.1002/1521-4095%28200110%2913% 3A19%3C1501%3A%3AAID-ADMA1501%3E3.0.CO%3B2-Z. doi:10.1002/1521-4095(200110)13: 19<1501::AID-ADMA1501>3.0.CO;2-Z

    work page doi:10.1002/1521-4095 2001

  15. [15]

    Williams, B.S., Kumar, S., Callebaut, H., Hu, Q., and Reno, J.L. (2003). Terahertz quantum- cascade laser atλ≈100µm using metal waveguide for mode confinement. Appl. Phys. Lett. 83, 2124–2126. URL:https://doi.org/10.1063/1.1611642. doi:10.1063/1.1611642. 14

    work page doi:10.1063/1.1611642 2003

  16. [16]

    Khurgin, J.B. (2015). How to deal with the loss in plasmonics and metamaterials. Nat. Nanotechnol.10, 2–6. doi:10.1038/nnano.2014.310

    work page doi:10.1038/nnano.2014.310 2015

  17. [17]

    Lalanne, P ., Hugonin, J., and Chavel, P . (2006). Optical properties of deep lamellar Grat- ings: A coupled Bloch-mode insight. J. Lightwave Technol.24, 2442–2449. URL:https: //ieeexplore.ieee.org/document/1643804. doi:10.1109/JLT.2006.874555

    work page doi:10.1109/jlt.2006.874555 2006

  18. [18]

    Kuznetsov, A.I., Miroshnichenko, A.E., Fu, Y .H., Zhang, J., and Luk’Y anchuk, B. (2012). Magnetic light. Sci. Rep.2, 492. URL:https://www.nature.com/articles/srep00492

    work page 2012

  19. [19]

    Won, R. (2019). Into the ‘Mie-tronic’ era. Nat. Photonics13, 585–587. URL:https://doi. org/10.1038/s41566-019-0512-5. doi:10.1038/s41566-019-0512-5

    work page doi:10.1038/s41566-019-0512-5 2019

  20. [20]

    Ouyang, Y .H., Luan, H.Y ., Zhao, Z.W., Mao, W.Z., and Ma, R.M. (2024). Singular dielectric nanolaser with atomic-scale field localization. Nature632, 287–293

    work page 2024

  21. [21]

    Mie, G. (1908). Beitr ¨age zur optik tr ¨uber medien, speziell kolloidaler metall ¨osungen. An- nalen der Physik330, 377–445

    work page 1908

  22. [22]

    Zalogina, A., Carletti, L., Rudenko, A., Moloney, J.V., Tripathi, A., Lee, H.C., Shadrivov, I., Park, H.G., Kivshar, Y ., and Kruk, S.S. (2023). High-harmonic generation from a subwave- length dielectric resonator. Sci. Adv9, eadg2655

    work page 2023

  23. [23]

    Hentschel, M., Koshelev, K., Sterl, F ., Both, S., Karst, J., Shamsafar, L., Weiss, T., Kivshar, Y ., and Giessen, H. (2023). Dielectric mie voids: confining light in air. Light: Sci. Appl.12, 3

    work page 2023

  24. [24]

    Hamidi, M., Koshelev, K., Gladyshev, S., Valero, A.C., Hentschel, M., Giessen, H., Kivshar, Y ., and Weiss, T. (2025). Quasi-babinet principle in dielectric resonators and mie voids. Phys. Rev. Research7, 013136

    work page 2025

  25. [25]

    Lu, Z., Koshelev, K.L., Tonkaev, P ., Chen, Z., Liu, D., Y ang, W., Kivshar, Y ., and Lu, Y . (2026). Light–matter interaction in van der Waals heterostructures with Mie voids. Advanced Photonics8, 026002. doi:10.1117/1.AP.8.2.026002

    work page doi:10.1117/1.ap.8.2.026002 2026

  26. [26]

    Savchenkov, A.A., Matsko, A.B., Ilchenko, V.S., and Maleki, L. (2007). Optical resonators with ten million finesse. Opt. Express15, 6768–6773. doi:10.1364/OE.15.006768

    work page doi:10.1364/oe.15.006768 2007

  27. [27]

    Foreman, M.R., Sedlmeir, F ., Schwefel, H.G., and Leuchs, G. (2016). Dielectric tuning and coupling of whispering gallery modes using an anisotropic prism. J. Opt. Soc. Am. B33, 2177–2195

    work page 2016

  28. [28]

    Mayer, K.M., and Hafner, J.H. (2011). Localized Surface Plasmon Resonance Sensors. Chem. Rev.111, 3828–3857. URL:https://doi.org/10.1021/cr100313v. doi:10.1021/ cr100313v

    work page doi:10.1021/cr100313v 2011

  29. [29]

    Silveirinha, M., and Engheta, N. (2006). Tunneling of electromagnetic energy through subwavelength channels and bends usingϵ-near-zero materials. Phys. Rev. Lett.97, 157403. URL:https://link.aps.org/doi/10.1103/PhysRevLett.97.157403. doi:10. 1103/PhysRevLett.97.157403

    work page doi:10.1103/physrevlett.97.157403 2006

  30. [30]

    Reshef, O., De Leon, I., Alam, M.Z., and Boyd, R.W. (2019). Nonlinear optical effects in epsilon-near-zero media. Nat. Rev. Mater.4, 535–551. doi:10.1038/s41578-019-0120-5. 15

    work page doi:10.1038/s41578-019-0120-5 2019

  31. [31]

    Silveirinha, M.G. (2014). Trapping light in open plasmonic nanostructures. Phys. Rev. A89. doi:10.1103/PhysRevA.89.023813

    work page doi:10.1103/physreva.89.023813 2014

  32. [32]

    Lei, D.Y ., Fern ´andez-Dom´ınguez, A.I., Sonnefraud, Y ., Appavoo, K., Haglund Jr, R.F ., Pendry, J.B., and Maier, S.A. (2012). Revealing plasmonic gap modes in particle-on-film systems using dark-field spectroscopy. ACS Nano6, 1380–1386

    work page 2012

  33. [33]

    Chong, K.E., Hopkins, B., Staude, I., Miroshnichenko, A.E., Dominguez, J., Decker, M., Neshev, D.N., Brener, I., and Kivshar, Y .S. (2014). Observation of fano resonances in all- dielectric nanoparticle oligomers. Small10, 1985–1990

    work page 2014

  34. [34]

    Fan, S., and Joannopoulos, J.D. (2002). Analysis of guided resonances in photonic crystal slabs. Phys. Rev. B65, 235112. doi:10.1103/PhysRevB.65.235112

    work page doi:10.1103/physrevb.65.235112 2002

  35. [35]

    Kravets, V.G., Kabashin, A.V., Barnes, W.L., and Grigorenko, A.N. (2018). Plasmonic Sur- face Lattice Resonances: A Review of Properties and Applications. Chem. Rev.118, 5912–

    work page 2018

  36. [36]

    doi:10.1021/acs.chemrev.8b00243

    work page doi:10.1021/acs.chemrev.8b00243

  37. [37]

    Koshelev, K., Lepeshov, S., Liu, M., Bogdanov, A., and Kivshar, Y . (2018). Asymmetric metasurfaces with high-q resonances governed by bound states in the continuum. Phys. Rev. Lett.121, 193903

    work page 2018

  38. [38]

    Miroshnichenko, A.E., Evlyukhin, A.B., Yu, Y .F ., Bakker, R.M., Chipouline, A., Kuznetsov, A.I., Luk’yanchuk, B., Chichkov, B.N., and Kivshar, Y .S. (2015). Nonradiating anapole modes in dielectric nanoparticles. Nat. Commun.6, 8069

    work page 2015

  39. [39]

    Ruan, Z., and Fan, S. (2010). Superscattering of Light from Subwavelength Nanostructures. Phys. Rev. Lett.105, 013901. doi:10.1103/PhysRevLett.105.013901

    work page doi:10.1103/physrevlett.105.013901 2010

  40. [40]

    Kerker, M., Wang, D.S., and Giles, C. (1983). Electromagnetic scattering by magnetic spheres. J. Opt. Soc. Am.73, 765–767

    work page 1983

  41. [41]

    Limonov, M.F ., Rybin, M.V., Poddubny, A.N., and Kivshar, Y .S. (2017). Fano resonances in photonics. Nat. Photonics11, 543–554

    work page 2017

  42. [42]

    K ¨uhne, J., Wang, J., Weber, T., K ¨uhner, L., Maier, S.A., and Tittl, A. (2021). Fabrication robustness in bic metasurfaces. Proc. SPIE10, 4305–4312

    work page 2021

  43. [43]

    Chen, Z., Yin, X., Jin, J., Zheng, Z., Zhang, Z., Wang, F ., He, L., Zhen, B., and Peng, C. (2022). Observation of miniaturized bound states in the continuum with ultra-high quality factors. Sci. Bull.67, 359–366. doi:10.1016/j.scib.2021.10.020

    work page doi:10.1016/j.scib.2021.10.020 2022

  44. [44]

    Liu, Z., Xu, Y ., Lin, Y ., Xiang, J., Feng, T., Cao, Q., Li, J., Lan, S., and Liu, J. (2019). High- $Q$ Quasibound States in the Continuum for Nonlinear Metasurfaces. Phys. Rev. Lett.123, 253901. doi:10.1103/PhysRevLett.123.253901

    work page doi:10.1103/physrevlett.123.253901 2019

  45. [45]

    Jin, J., Yin, X., Ni, L., Solja ˇci´c, M., Zhen, B., and Peng, C. (2019). Topologically enabled ultrahigh-Q guided resonances robust to out-of-plane scattering. Nature574, 501–504. doi: 10.1038/s41586-019-1664-7

    work page doi:10.1038/s41586-019-1664-7 2019

  46. [46]

    Khanikaev, A.B., and Al `u, A. (2024). Topological photonics: Robustness and beyond. Nat. Commun.15, 931. doi:10.1038/s41467-024-45194-2

    work page doi:10.1038/s41467-024-45194-2 2024

  47. [47]

    Kajfez, D. (2003). Random and systematic uncertainties of reflection-type q-factor measure- ment with network analyzer. IEEE Trans. Microw. Theory Techn.51, 512–519. 16

    work page 2003

  48. [48]

    Sinev, I.S., Koshelev, K., Liu, Z., Rudenko, A., Ladutenko, K., Shcherbakov, A., Sadrieva, Z., Baranov, M., Itina, T., Liu, J., Bogdanov, A.A., and Kivshar, Y . (2021). Observation of Ultrafast Self-Action Effects in Quasi-BIC Resonant Metasurfaces. Nano Lett.21, 8848–

    work page 2021

  49. [49]

    doi:10.1021/acs.nanolett.1c03257

    work page doi:10.1021/acs.nanolett.1c03257

  50. [50]

    Liu, Z., Yin, X., Bogdanov, A., Nie, Y ., Zuo, Y ., Li, H., Wang, F ., and Peng, C. (2025). Optical multistability in a compact microcavity enabled by near-exceptional coupling. doi: 10.48550/arXiv.2511.12037.arXiv:2511.12037

    work page doi:10.48550/arxiv.2511.12037.arxiv:2511.12037 2025

  51. [51]

    Leykam, D., and Flach, S. (2018). Perspective: photonic flatbands. APL Photonics3

    work page 2018

  52. [52]

    Sun, K., Cai, Y ., Kivshar, Y ., and Han, Z. (2025). Flatband high-q metasurfaces inspired by coupled-resonator optical waveguides. Advanced Photonics7, 056008–056008

    work page 2025

  53. [53]

    Murai, S., Abujetas, D.R., Liu, L., Castellanos, G.W., Giannini, V., S´anchez-Gil, J.A., Tanaka, K., and G ´omez Rivas, J. (2022). Engineering bound states in the continuum at telecom wavelengths with non-bravais lattices. Laser Photonics Rev.16, 2100661

    work page 2022

  54. [54]

    Wang, W., Srivastava, Y .K., Tan, T.C., Wang, Z., and Singh, R. (2023). Brillouin zone folding driven bound states in the continuum. Nat. Commun.14, 2811

    work page 2023

  55. [55]

    Tselikov, G.I., Minnekhanov, A.A., Ermolaev, G.A., Tikhonowski, G.V., Kazantsev, I.S., Dyubo, D.V., Panova, D.A., Tselikov, D.I., Popov, A.A., Mazitov, A.B. et al. (2025). Tunable nanostructuring for van der waals materials. ACS Nano

    work page 2025

  56. [56]

    Munkhbat, B., K ¨uc ¸¨uk¨oz, B., Baranov, D.G., Antosiewicz, T.J., and Shegai, T.O. (2023). Nanostructured transition metal dichalcogenide multilayers for advanced nanophotonics. Laser Photonics Rev.17, 2200057

    work page 2023

  57. [57]

    Huang, L., Jin, R., Zhou, C., Li, G., Xu, L., Overvig, A., Deng, F ., Chen, X., Lu, W., Al `u, A. et al. (2023). Ultrahigh-q guided mode resonances in an all-dielectric metasurface. Nat. Commun.14, 3433

    work page 2023

  58. [58]

    Chen, X., Leng, R., Liu, K., Guo, C., Zhu, Z., Qin, S., and Zhang, J. (2023). High quality factor resonant metasurface with etchless lithium niobate. Opt. Laser Technol.161, 109163

    work page 2023

  59. [59]

    Reshef, O., Saad-Bin-Alam, M., Huttunen, M.J., Carlow, G., Sullivan, B.T., M ´enard, J.M., Dolgaleva, K., and Boyd, R.W. (2019). Multiresonant high-q plasmonic metasurfaces. Nano Lett.19, 6429–6434

    work page 2019

  60. [60]

    Zhou, Y ., Guo, S., Overvig, A.C., and Alu, A. (2023). Multiresonant nonlocal metasurfaces. Nano Lett.23, 6768–6775

    work page 2023

  61. [61]

    Huang, S.H., Su, H.P ., Chen, C.Y ., Lin, Y .C., Y ang, Z., Shi, Y ., Song, Q., and Wu, P .C. (2024). Microcavity-assisted multi-resonant metasurfaces enabling versatile wavefront engineering. Nat. Commun.15, 9658

    work page 2024

  62. [62]

    Cheng, M., Chen, X., Zhang, J., Y e, X., and Ai, B. (2025). Closing the loop in next-generation sensing through shadow sphere lithography, plasmonics, and artificial intelligence. Chem. Soc. Rev

    work page 2025

  63. [63]

    Gladyshev, S., Karamanos, T.D., Kuhn, L., Beutel, D., Weiss, T., Rockstuhl, C., and Bog- danov, A. (2023). Inverse design of all-dielectric metasurfaces with accidental bound states in the continuum. Proc. SPIE12, 3767–3779. 17

    work page 2023