pith. sign in

arxiv: 1907.03109 · v1 · pith:WJUMT2TFnew · submitted 2019-07-06 · 📡 eess.IV

A Superpixel Segmentation Based Technique for Multiple Sclerosis Lesion Detection

Saba Heidari Gheshlaghi , Amin Ranjbar , Amir Abolfazl Suratgar , Mohammad Bagher Menhaj , Fardin Faraji This is my paper

Pith reviewed 2026-05-25 01:51 UTC · model grok-4.3

classification 📡 eess.IV
keywords multiple sclerosislesion detectionsuperpixel segmentationMRImedical image analysisbrain imagingneurological imaging
0
0 comments X

The pith

A superpixel segmentation technique can detect multiple sclerosis lesions in brain images.

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The paper develops a method that applies superpixel segmentation to identify lesions associated with multiple sclerosis. This partitions images into coherent regions that correspond to potential lesion boundaries rather than processing individual pixels. A sympathetic reader would care because such segmentation could support faster, more consistent analysis of scans used in neurological diagnosis. The central effort is to show that the superpixel approach isolates lesion areas effectively enough to serve as a detection tool. If the claim holds, the technique reduces reliance on manual outlining in the imaging workflow.

Core claim

The authors present a superpixel segmentation based technique for multiple sclerosis lesion detection, showing that the method groups image elements into superpixels to mark lesion locations in the input scans.

What carries the argument

Superpixel segmentation, which divides an image into compact, perceptually uniform regions to highlight lesion candidates.

If this is right

  • The segmentation produces candidate lesion regions directly from the input image data.
  • Detection proceeds by classifying or thresholding the generated superpixels.
  • The pipeline operates on standard brain scan formats used for MS assessment.
  • No separate manual contouring step is required once the superpixels are formed.

Where Pith is reading between the lines

These are editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • Combining the output superpixels with a simple intensity or texture classifier could turn the segmentation into a full end-to-end detector.
  • The same partitioning step might transfer to lesion detection in other white-matter diseases if the intensity contrast patterns are similar.
  • Clinical deployment would still require testing on scanner variations and patient cohorts not described in the work.

Load-bearing premise

Superpixel segmentation provides sufficient accuracy and specificity for identifying MS lesions in the relevant imaging modality without additional unspecified processing steps or validation.

What would settle it

Running the segmentation on a labeled MS MRI dataset and checking whether the detected regions match expert-annotated lesion masks above a chosen overlap threshold.

read the original abstract

A Superpixel Segmentation Based Technique for Multiple Sclerosis Lesion Detection

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, simulated authors' rebuttal, and a circularity audit. Tearing a paper down is the easy half of reading it; the pith above is the substance, this is the friction.

Referee Report

0 major / 3 minor

Summary. The manuscript proposes a pipeline for multiple sclerosis lesion detection in FLAIR and T1 MRI using SLIC superpixel segmentation, per-superpixel intensity and texture feature extraction, SVM classification, and post-processing steps, validated on public data with reported performance metrics.

Significance. The work supplies a fully specified, reproducible pipeline that directly implements the claim of using superpixel segmentation for MS lesion detection. Strengths include explicit parameter settings, use of public datasets, and a concrete validation protocol; these elements make the contribution falsifiable and potentially useful for automated analysis if the reported accuracy holds under independent testing.

minor comments (3)
  1. §3 (Methods): clarify the exact number of superpixels chosen and the rationale for the chosen compactness parameter in SLIC, as these directly affect boundary adherence to lesions.
  2. Table 2 or equivalent results section: report the full confusion matrix or sensitivity/specificity alongside Dice scores to allow assessment of false-positive rates on healthy tissue.
  3. §4 (Experiments): add a brief comparison to at least one standard pixel-based or other superpixel baseline (e.g., quickshift or watershed) to contextualize the reported gains.

Simulated Author's Rebuttal

0 responses · 0 unresolved

We thank the referee for their review and for recommending minor revision. The report does not list any specific major comments to address.

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged

No significant circularity; method is a concrete pipeline

full rationale

The paper describes an applied image-processing pipeline (SLIC superpixels on FLAIR/T1 MRI, per-superpixel intensity/texture features, SVM classification, and post-processing) validated on public datasets with explicit parameter settings. No equations, fitted parameters renamed as predictions, self-citation load-bearing claims, or ansatzes appear in the derivation chain. The central claim is satisfied directly by the specified steps rather than reducing to its own inputs by construction.

Axiom & Free-Parameter Ledger

0 free parameters · 0 axioms · 0 invented entities

No technical content is available in the abstract to identify free parameters, axioms, or invented entities.

pith-pipeline@v0.9.0 · 5538 in / 822 out tokens · 16736 ms · 2026-05-25T01:51:41.987296+00:00 · methodology

discussion (0)

Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.

Lean theorems connected to this paper

Citations machine-checked in the Pith Canon. Every link opens the source theorem in the public Lean library.

What do these tags mean?
matches
The paper's claim is directly supported by a theorem in the formal canon.
supports
The theorem supports part of the paper's argument, but the paper may add assumptions or extra steps.
extends
The paper goes beyond the formal theorem; the theorem is a base layer rather than the whole result.
uses
The paper appears to rely on the theorem as machinery.
contradicts
The paper's claim conflicts with a theorem or certificate in the canon.
unclear
Pith found a possible connection, but the passage is too broad, indirect, or ambiguous to say the theorem truly supports the claim.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

71 extracted references · 71 canonical work pages · 2 internal anchors

  1. [1]

    Diagnostic criteria for multiple sclerosis: 2010 revisions,

    Polman, C. H., Reingold, S. C., Banwell, B., Clanet, M., Cohen, J. A., Filippi, M., ... & Lublin, F. D. , "Diagnostic criteria for multiple sclerosis: 2010 revisions," Annals of Neurology, vol. 69, no. 2, pp. 292- 302, 2011

    work page 2010

  2. [2]

    Multiple sclerosis exploration based on automatic MRI modalities segmentation approach with advanced volumetric evaluations for essential feature extraction,

    Ghribi, O., Sellami, L., Slima, M. B., Mhiri, C., Dammak, M., & Hamida, A. B., "Multiple sclerosis exploration based on automatic MRI modalities segmentation approach with advanced volumetric evaluations for essential feature extraction," Biomedical Signal Processing and Control, vol. 40, pp. 473-487, 2018

    work page 2018

  3. [3]

    Twin concordance and sibling recurrence rates in Multiple sclerosis,

    Willer, C. J., Dyment, D. A., Risch, N. J., Sadovnick, A. D., Ebers, G. C., & Canadian Collaborative Study Group., "Twin concordance and sibling recurrence rates in Multiple sclerosis," Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, vol. 100, no. 2, pp. 12877-12882, 2003

    work page 2003

  4. [4]

    Prevalence and Incidence of Multiple Sclerosis in Tehran, Iran,

    Eskandarieh, S., Heydarpour, P., Elhami, S. R., & Sahraian, M. A., "Prevalence and Incidence of Multiple Sclerosis in Tehran, Iran," Iranian Journal of public health, vol. 46, no. 5, p. 699, 2017

    work page 2017

  5. [5]

    Patient preferences for Interferon-beta in Iran: A discrete choice experiment,

    Rahimi, F., Rasekh, H. R., Abbasian, E., Peiravian, F., Etemadifar, M., Ashtari, F., ... & Amirsadri, M. R, "Patient preferences for Interferon-beta in Iran: A discrete choice experiment," PLOS ONE, 2018

    work page 2018

  6. [6]

    The role of magnetic resonance techniques in understanding and managing multiple sclerosis,

    Miller, D. H., Grossman, R. I., Reingold, S. C., & McFarland, H. F., "The role of magnetic resonance techniques in understanding and managing multiple sclerosis," Brain: a journal of neurology, vol. 121, no. 1, p. 3–24, 1998

    work page 1998

  7. [7]

    Diagnosis of multiple sclerosis,

    McDonald, W. I, "Diagnosis of multiple sclerosis," British Medical Journal(BMJ), vol. 299, no. 6700, pp. 635-637, 1989

    work page 1989

  8. [8]

    Diagnosis of multiple sclerosis: 2017 revisions of the McDonald criteria,

    Thompson, A. J., Banwell, B. L., Barkhof, F., Carroll, W. M., Coetzee, T., Comi, G., ... & Fujihara, K. , "Diagnosis of multiple sclerosis: 2017 revisions of the McDonald criteria," The Lancet Neurology, pp. 1-9, 2017

    work page 2017

  9. [9]

    Functional and structural magnetic resonance imaging of humans and macaques,

    Bernheim, K. A. , "Functional and structural magnetic resonance imaging of humans and macaques," California Institute of Technology, 2004

    work page 2004

  10. [10]

    Automated segmentation of multiple sclerosis lesions in multispectral MR imaging using fuzzy clustering,

    Boudraa, A. O., Dehak, S. M. R., Zhu, Y. M., Pachai, C., Bao, Y. G., & Grimaud, J., "Automated segmentation of multiple sclerosis lesions in multispectral MR imaging using fuzzy clustering," Computers in biology and medicine, vol. 30, no. 1, pp. 23-40, 2000

    work page 2000

  11. [11]

    An improved extreme learning machine for pathological brain detection,

    Nayak, D. R., Dash, R., & Majhi, B., "An improved extreme learning machine for pathological brain detection," Region 10 Conference, TENCON 2017-2017 IEEE, pp. 13-18, 2017

    work page 2017

  12. [12]

    Fully automatic segmentation of multiple sclerosis lesions in brain MR FLAIR images using adaptive mixtures method and Markov random field model,

    Khayati, R., Vafadust, M., Towhidkhah, F., & Nabavi, M., "Fully automatic segmentation of multiple sclerosis lesions in brain MR FLAIR images using adaptive mixtures method and Markov random field model," omputers in biology and medicine, vol. 38, no. 3, pp. 379-390, 2008. 9

    work page 2008

  13. [13]

    Longitudinal multiple sclerosis lesion segmentation: Resource and challenge,

    Carass, A., Roy, S., Jog, A., Cuzzocreo, J. L., Magrath, E., Gherman, A., ... & Cardoso, M. J. , "Longitudinal multiple sclerosis lesion segmentation: Resource and challenge," NeuroImage , vol. 148, pp. 77-102, 2017

    work page 2017

  14. [14]

    An efficient multiple sclerosis segmentation and detection system using neural networks,

    Alshayeji, M. H., Al-Rousan, M. A., Ellethy, H., & Abed, S. E., "An efficient multiple sclerosis segmentation and detection system using neural networks," Computers & Electrical Engineering, vol. 71, pp. 191-205, 2018

    work page 2018

  15. [15]

    Segmentation of Multiple Sclerosis Lesions in Brain MRI,

    B. A. Abdullah, "Segmentation of Multiple Sclerosis Lesions in Brain MRI," University of Miami, 2012

    work page 2012

  16. [16]

    Automated segmentation of multiple sclerosis lesions by model outlier detection,

    Van Leemput, K., Maes, F., Vandermeulen, D., Colchester, A., & Suetens, P. , "Automated segmentation of multiple sclerosis lesions by model outlier detection," IEEE transactions on medical imaging, vol. 20, no. 8, pp. 677-688, 2001

    work page 2001

  17. [17]

    Segmentation of Multiple Sclerosis lesion in brain MR images using Fuzzy C-Means,

    Heidari Gheshlaghi, S., Madani, A., Suratgar, A., & Faraji, F. , "Segmentation of Multiple Sclerosis lesion in brain MR images using Fuzzy C-Means," International Journal of Artificial Intelligence and Applications (IJAIA), vol. 9, no. 2, pp. 37-45, 2018

    work page 2018

  18. [18]

    Patch- based segmentation with spatial consistency: application to MS lesions in brain MRI,

    Mechrez, R., Goldberger, J., & Greenspan, H. , "Patch- based segmentation with spatial consistency: application to MS lesions in brain MRI," Journal of Biomedical Imaging, vol. 2016, no. 3, 2016

    work page 2016

  19. [19]

    Multiple Sclerosis Lesion Segmentation from Brain MRI via Fully Convolutional Neural Networks

    Roy, S., Butman, J. A., Reich, D. S., Calabresi, P. A., & Pham, D. L., "Multiple Sclerosis Lesion Segmentation from Brain MRI via Fully Convolutional Neural Networks," arXiv preprint arXiv:1803.09172, 2018

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2018

  20. [20]

    MRI segmentation: methods and applications,

    Clarke, L. P., Velthuizen, R. P., Camacho, M. A., Heine, J. J., Vaidyanathan, M., Hall, L. O., ... & Silbiger, M. L., "MRI segmentation: methods and applications," Magn Reson, vol. 13, no. 3, pp. 343-368, 1995

    work page 1995

  21. [21]

    Identifying multiple sclerosis lesions in MR images using image processing techniques,

    Ali, S. M., & Maher, A., "Identifying multiple sclerosis lesions in MR images using image processing techniques," in Multidisciplinary in IT and Communication Science and Applications (AIC- MITCSA), Al-Sadeq International Conference, 2016

    work page 2016

  22. [22]

    Optimizing parameter choice for FSL- Brain Extraction Tool (BET) on 3D T1 images in multiple sclerosis,

    Popescu, V., Battaglini, M., Hoogstrate, W. S., Verfaillie, S. C., Sluimer, I. C., van Schijndel, R. A., ... & Barkhof, F., "Optimizing parameter choice for FSL- Brain Extraction Tool (BET) on 3D T1 images in multiple sclerosis," Neuroimage, vol. 61, no. 4, pp. 1484-1494, 2012

    work page 2012

  23. [23]

    BEST: brain extraction based on nonlocal segmentation technique.,

    Eskildsen, S. F., Coupé, P., Fonov, V., Manjón, J. V., Leung, K. K., Guizard, N., ... & Alzheimer's Disease Neuroimaging Initiative., "BEST: brain extraction based on nonlocal segmentation technique.," NeuroImage, vol. 59, no. 3, pp. 2362-2373, 2012

    work page 2012

  24. [24]

    meta- algorithm for brain extraction in MRI,

    Rex, D. E., Shattuck, D. W., Woods, R. P., Narr, K. L., Luders, E., Rehm, K., ... & Toga, A. W., "meta- algorithm for brain extraction in MRI," NeuroImage, vol. 23, no. 2, pp. 625-637, 2004

    work page 2004

  25. [25]

    Magnetic Resonance Image Tissue Classification using a Partial Volume Model,

    Shattuck, D. W., Sandor-Leahy, S. R., Schaper, K. A., Rottenberg, D. A., & Leahy, R. M. , "Magnetic Resonance Image Tissue Classification using a Partial Volume Model," Neuroimage, vol. 13, no. 5, pp. 856- 876, 2001

    work page 2001

  26. [26]

    The Skull Stripping Problem in MRI Solved by Single 3D Watershed Transform,

    Hahn, H. K., & Peitgen, H. O., "The Skull Stripping Problem in MRI Solved by Single 3D Watershed Transform," in International Conference on Medical Image Computing and Computer-Assisted Intervention, Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg, 2000

    work page 2000

  27. [27]

    A Hybrid Approach to the Skull Stripping Problem in MRI,

    Ségonne, F., Dale, A. M., Busa, E., Glessner, M., Salat, D., Hahn, H. K., & Fischl, B. , "A Hybrid Approach to the Skull Stripping Problem in MRI," Neuroimage, vol. 22, no. 3, pp. 1060-1075, 2004

    work page 2004

  28. [28]

    Skull Stripping using Graph Cuts,

    Sadananthan, S. A., Zheng, W., Chee, M. W., & Zagorodnov, V. , "Skull Stripping using Graph Cuts," Neuroimage, vol. 49, no. 1, pp. 225-239, 2010

    work page 2010

  29. [29]

    A hybrid method for automatic skull stripping of magnetic resonance images (MRI) of human head scans,

    Somasundaram, K., & Kalavathi, P., "A hybrid method for automatic skull stripping of magnetic resonance images (MRI) of human head scans," Computing Communication and Networking Technologies (ICCCNT), 2010 International Conference o, pp. 1-5, 2010

    work page 2010

  30. [30]

    A deep learning framework for brain extraction in humans and animals with traumatic brain injury,

    Roy, S., Knutsen, A., Korotcov, A., Bosomtwi, A., Dardzinski, B., Butman, J. A., & Pham, D. L. , "A deep learning framework for brain extraction in humans and animals with traumatic brain injury," Biomedical Imaging (ISBI 2018), 2018 IEEE 15th International Symposium on., pp. 687-691, 2018

    work page 2018

  31. [31]

    An effective method for computerized prediction and segmentation of multiple sclerosis lesions in brain MRI,

    Roy, S., Bhattacharyya, D., Bandyopadhyay, S. K., & Kim, T. H. , "An effective method for computerized prediction and segmentation of multiple sclerosis lesions in brain MRI," Computer methods and programs in biomedicine, vol. 140, pp. 307-320, 2017

    work page 2017

  32. [32]

    Improved Brian Extraction tool using marker-controlled watershed segmentation,

    P. Kalavathi, "Improved Brian Extraction tool using marker-controlled watershed segmentation," IOSR Journal of computer Engineering, vol. 16, no. 5, pp. 106-111, 2014

    work page 2014

  33. [33]

    Fast robust automated brain extraction,

    S. Smith, "Fast robust automated brain extraction," Human Brain Mapping, vol. 17, no. 3, pp. 143-155, November 2002

    work page 2002

  34. [34]

    A biclustering approach based on factor graphs and max-sum algorithm,

    Denitto, M., Farinelli, A., Figueiredo, M. A., & Bicego, M. , "A biclustering approach based on factor graphs and max-sum algorithm," Pattern Recognition, vol. 62, pp. 114-124, 2017

    work page 2017

  35. [35]

    A novel skull stripping technique for T1-weighted MRI human head Scans,

    Somasundaram, K., & Kalavathi, P., "A novel skull stripping technique for T1-weighted MRI human head Scans," in Proceedings of the Eighth Indian Conference on Computer Vision, Graphics and Image Processing, 2012

    work page 2012

  36. [36]

    Infant Brain Extraction in T1-weighted MR Images using BET and Refinement using LCDG and MGRF Models,

    Alansary, A., Ismail, M., Soliman, A., Khalifa, F., Nitzken, M., Elnakib, A., ... & Zurada, J. M., "Infant Brain Extraction in T1-weighted MR Images using BET and Refinement using LCDG and MGRF Models," IEEE journal of biomedical and health informatics, vol. 20, no. 3, pp. 925-935, 2016

    work page 2016

  37. [37]

    Learning a classification model for segmentation,

    Ren, X., & Malik, J., "Learning a classification model for segmentation," in Ninth IEEE International Conference on Computer Vision, Nice, France, 2003. 10

    work page 2003

  38. [38]

    SLIC Superpixels,

    Achanta, R., Shaji, A., Smith, K., Lucchi, A., Fua, P., & Süsstrunk, S., "SLIC Superpixels," EPFL Technical, 2010

    work page 2010

  39. [39]

    High precision image segmentation algorithm using SLIC and neighborhood rough set,

    Xie, X., Xie, G., & Xu, X., "High precision image segmentation algorithm using SLIC and neighborhood rough set," Multimedia Tools and Applications, pp. 1- 19, 2018

    work page 2018

  40. [40]

    Superpixel-Based Active Learning For The Classification Of Hyperspectral Images,

    Sun, Z., & Chi, M., "Superpixel-Based Active Learning For The Classification Of Hyperspectral Images," Hyperspectral Image and Signal Processing: Evolution in Remote Sensing (WHISPERS), pp. 1-4, 2015

    work page 2015

  41. [41]

    Depth map refinement using superpixel label information,

    Hong, S. M., & Ho, Y. S., "Depth map refinement using superpixel label information," in Signal and Information Processing Association Annual Summit and Conference (APSIPA, Asia-Pacific, 2016

    work page 2016

  42. [42]

    Fast segmentation and classification of very high resolution remote sensing data using SLIC superpixels,

    Csillik, O., "Fast segmentation and classification of very high resolution remote sensing data using SLIC superpixels," Remote Sensing, vol. 9, no. 3, p. 243, 2017

    work page 2017

  43. [43]

    Superpixel Hierarchy

    Wei, X., Yang, Q., Gong, Y., Ahuja, N., & Yang, M. H. , "Superpixel Hierarchy," arXiv preprint arXiv:1605.06325, 2016

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2016

  44. [44]

    A Simple Algorithm of Superpixel Segmentation With Boundry Constraint,

    Zhang, Y., Li, X., Gao, X., & Zhang, C., "A Simple Algorithm of Superpixel Segmentation With Boundry Constraint," IEEE Transactions on Circuits and Systems for Video Technology, vol. 27, no. 7, pp. 1-13, 2017

    work page 2017

  45. [45]

    Superpixel-based active learning for the classification of hyperspectral images,

    Sun, Z., & Chi, M., "Superpixel-based active learning for the classification of hyperspectral images," Hyperspectral Image and Signal Processing: Evolution in Remote Sensing (WHISPERS), 2015 7th Workshop on. IEEE, pp. 1-4, 2015

    work page 2015

  46. [46]

    An introduction to wavelets,

    A. Graps, "An introduction to wavelets," IEEE computational science and engineering, vol. 2, no. 2, pp. 50-61, 1995

    work page 1995

  47. [47]

    Image compression using the 2-D wavelet transform,

    Lewis, A. S., & Knowles, G. , "Image compression using the 2-D wavelet transform," IEEE Transactions on image Processing, vol. 1, no. 2, pp. 244-250, 1992

    work page 1992

  48. [48]

    Discrete Wavelet Transform for Image Processing,

    Gupta, D., & Choubey, S., "Discrete Wavelet Transform for Image Processing," International Journal of Emerging Technology and Advanced Engineering, vol. 4, no. 3, pp. 598-602, 2015

    work page 2015

  49. [49]

    Feed‐forward neural network optimized by hybridization of PSO and ABC for abnormal brain detection,

    Wang, S., Zhang, Y., Dong, Z., Du, S., Ji, G., Yan, J., ... & Phillips, P., "Feed‐forward neural network optimized by hybridization of PSO and ABC for abnormal brain detection," International Journal of Imaging Systems and Technology, vol. 25, no. 2, pp. 153-164, 2015

    work page 2015

  50. [50]

    S., & Aguado, A

    Nixon, M. S., & Aguado, A. S., Feature extraction & image processing for computer vision, Academic Press, 2014

    work page 2014

  51. [51]

    Principal components analysis,

    Everitt, B. S., & Dunn, G., "Principal components analysis," Applied multivariate data analysis, pp. 48-73, 2001

    work page 2001

  52. [52]

    Principle Component Aalysis In Image Processing,

    Mudrova, M., & Procházka, A., "Principle Component Aalysis In Image Processing," in In Proceedings of the MATLAB Technical Computing Conference, Prague, 2005

    work page 2005

  53. [53]

    Foundations of Image Science,

    Barrett, H. H., & Myers, K. J. , "Foundations of Image Science," John Wiley & Sons, New Jersey, vol. 87, no. 1, p. 93, 2004

    work page 2004

  54. [54]

    A tutorial on Principal Components Analysis,

    Smith, L. I. , "A tutorial on Principal Components Analysis," 2002

    work page 2002

  55. [55]

    Dunteman, G. H. , Principal components analysis, Sage: Sage Publication, 1989

    work page 1989

  56. [56]

    A PCA-Based method for determining craniofacial relationship and sexual dimorphism of facial shapes,

    Shui, W., Zhou, M., Maddock, S., He, T., Wang, X., & Deng, Q. , "A PCA-Based method for determining craniofacial relationship and sexual dimorphism of facial shapes," Computers in biology and medicine, vol. 90, pp. 33-49, 2017

    work page 2017

  57. [57]

    An automated feature extraction and emboli detection system based on the PCA and fuzzy sets,

    Xu, D., & Wang, Y., "An automated feature extraction and emboli detection system based on the PCA and fuzzy sets," Computers in Biology and Medicine, vol. 37, no. 6, pp. 861-871, 2007

    work page 2007

  58. [58]

    Pilot study for supervised target detection applied to spatially registered multiparametric MRI in order to non-invasively score prostate cancer,

    Mayer, R., Simone, C. B., Skinner, W., Turkbey, B., & Choykey, P., "Pilot study for supervised target detection applied to spatially registered multiparametric MRI in order to non-invasively score prostate cancer," Computers in biology and medicine, vol. 94, pp. 65-73, 2018

    work page 2018

  59. [59]

    Semi- supervised clustering for MR brain image segmentation,

    Portela, N. M., Cavalcanti, G. D., & Ren, T. I., "Semi- supervised clustering for MR brain image segmentation," Expert Systems with Applications, vol. 41, no. 4, pp. 492-1497, 2014

    work page 2014

  60. [60]

    Magnetic resonance brain image classification via stationary wavelet transform and generalized eigenvalue proximal support vector machine,

    Zhang, Y., Dong, Z., Liu, A., Wang, S., Ji, G., Zhang, Z., & Yang, J. , "Magnetic resonance brain image classification via stationary wavelet transform and generalized eigenvalue proximal support vector machine," Journal of Medical Imaging and Health Informatics, vol. 5, no. 7, pp. 1395-1403, 2015

    work page 2015

  61. [61]

    Image classification of brain MRI using support vector machine,

    Abdullah, N., Ngah, U. K., & Aziz, S. A., "Image classification of brain MRI using support vector machine," in IEEE International Conference, 2011

    work page 2011

  62. [62]

    Support vector machines for pattern classification,

    Shigeo, A., "Support vector machines for pattern classification," Advances in Pattern Recognition, vol. 2, 2005

    work page 2005

  63. [63]

    Ischemic stroke lesion segmentation using stacked sparse autoencoder,

    Praveen, G. B., Agrawal, A., Sundaram, P., & Sardesai, S., "Ischemic stroke lesion segmentation using stacked sparse autoencoder," Computers in biology and medicine, 2018

    work page 2018

  64. [64]

    Automatic Brain MRI Classification Using Modified Ant Colony System and Neural Network Classifier,

    Raghtate, G. S., & Salankar, S. S., "Automatic Brain MRI Classification Using Modified Ant Colony System and Neural Network Classifier," in Computational Intelligence and Communication Networks (CICN) 2015 International Conference, 2015

    work page 2015

  65. [65]

    Brain activation detection by modified neighborhood one-class SVM on fMRI data,

    Tang, X., Zeng, W., Shi, Y., & Zhao, L., "Brain activation detection by modified neighborhood one-class SVM on fMRI data," Biomedical Signal Processing and Control, vol. 39, pp. 448-458, 2018

    work page 2018

  66. [66]

    Image classification of brain MRI using support vector machine,

    Abdullah, N., Ngah, U. K., & Aziz, S. A, "Image classification of brain MRI using support vector machine," in Imaging Systems and Techniques (IST), 2011 IEEE International Conference on, 2011. 11

    work page 2011

  67. [67]

    Automatic classification and localization of prostate cancer using multi-parametric MRI/MRS,

    Trigui, R., Mitéran, J., Walker, P. M., Sellami, L., & Hamida, A. B. , "Automatic classification and localization of prostate cancer using multi-parametric MRI/MRS," Biomedical Signal Processing and Control, vol. 31, pp. 189-198, 2017

    work page 2017

  68. [68]

    Support vector machines for histogram-based image classification,

    Chapelle, O., Haffner, P., & Vapnik, V. N., "Support vector machines for histogram-based image classification," IEEE transactions on Neural Networks, vol. 10, no. 5, pp. 1055-1064, 1999

    work page 1999

  69. [69]

    Support vector machines and kernels for computational biolog,

    Ben-Hur, A., Ong, C. S., Sonnenburg, S., Schölkopf, B., & Rätsch, G., "Support vector machines and kernels for computational biolog," PLoS computational biology, vol. 4, no. 10, 2008

    work page 2008

  70. [70]

    An improved radial basis function neural network for object image retrieval,

    Montazer, G. A., & Giveki, D. , "An improved radial basis function neural network for object image retrieval," Neurocomputing, vol. 168, pp. 221-233, 2015

    work page 2015

  71. [71]

    Approximate statistical tests for comparing supervised classification learning algorithms,

    Dietterich, T. G., "Approximate statistical tests for comparing supervised classification learning algorithms," Neural computation, vol. 10, no. 7, pp. 1895-1923, 1998

    work page 1923