Pith. sign in

REVIEW 3 major objections 4 minor 1 cited by

Diffusion Tensor MRI and Spherical-Deconvolution-Based Tractography on an Ultra-Low Field Portable MRI System

T0 review · 3 major / 4 minor · reviewed 2026-08-07 · deepseek-v4-flash

Challenge this review Re-run · record.json Download PDF Read on arXiv ↗ Review JSON

Pith's one-line read This paper claims that a 0.064 T portable MRI scanner, corrected for its inhomogeneous field, can reconstruct most major white matter tracts in healthy adults within clinically tolerable scan times.

desk verdict First plausible whole-brain tractography at 64 mT, but the abstract's 'strong correspondence' claims outrun the quantitative evidence; conditionally worth engaging. read the letter →

arxiv 2506.04473 v1 pith:WLFFEVKS submitted 2025-06-04 physics.med-ph

James Gholam , Phil Schmid , Joshua Ametepe , Alix Plumley , Leandro Beltrachini , Francesco Padormo , Rui Teixeira , Rafael OHalloran
show 6 more authors
Kaloian Petkov Klaus Engel Steven CR Williams Sean Deoni Mara Cercignani Derek K Jones
This is my paper · ORCID
classification physics.med-ph
keywords ultra-low-fieldMRIportablediffusiontensorimagingtractographysphericaldeconvolutionfibreorientationdistributionwhitematterpoint-of-care
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal

The pith

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The reading

Ultra-low-field MRI (0.064 T) has typically been considered too noisy and too distorted for diffusion tractography. This paper claims that a portable point-of-care scanner can nevertheless reconstruct most major white matter bundles in healthy adults in about one hour, using a 3D multi-shot diffusion-weighted fast spin-echo readout, a retrospective correction for the scanner's large static magnetic-field gradient, and spherical-deconvolution fibre orientation estimation. The recovered fractional anisotropy, mean diffusivity, and fibre orientation distributions are reported to show good agreement with 3 T reference scans in the same participants. If the claim holds, white-matter microstructure and connectivity could be measured on low-cost, portable systems, bringing diffusion tractography to settings and populations that lack access to high-field MRI.

What carries the argument

The pipeline rests on three components. The first is a 3D multi-shot diffusion-weighted fast spin-echo (DW-FSE) sequence that collects many echoes per excitation to offset the low signal-to-noise ratio, using isotropic 3 mm voxels and a non-Cartesian centre-out phase-encoding order. The second is a retrospective correction (Eq. 2) that models the scanner's inhomogeneous static B0 field as a spatially varying scalar factor a(r) multiplying the b-value, then rescales each voxel's signal using the b=0 image; this assumes the static gradient does not rotate the effective encoding direction. The third is multi-tissue constrained spherical deconvolution to estimate fibre orientation distributions, followed by anatomically constrained tractography and prior-based bundle segmentation to filter streamlines into anatomically meaningful tracts.

What would settle it

Using the measured static gradient (up to 1.4 mT/m at 8 cm from isocentre), compute the full b-matrix including the rotation of the encoding gradient for the 24.9 mT/m diffusion gradients, and re-fit the diffusion tensor without the scalar-only approximation; if peripheral FA values and the hemispheric tract-density asymmetry remain unchanged, the scalar correction is sufficient, and if they shift, the paper's central tractography results are biased in those regions.

Watch

Extended reading notes

Core claim

The central claim is that anatomically faithful tractography is achievable at 0.064 T on a commercially available portable MRI system, not just diagnostic diffusion imaging. Using 18 diffusion directions at b = 945 s/$mm^{2}$, a 3D multi-shot DW-FSE sequence, and the scalar b-value rescaling correction of Eq. (2), the authors reconstruct the arcuate, inferior longitudinal, inferior fronto-occipital, uncinate, and superior longitudinal fasciculi, the cingulum, the upper fornix, the corticospinal tract, and the corpus callosum. They also report that fibre orientation distributions from ultra-low-field data agree with high-field references, although the fODFs are blurred, show spurious grey-matter lobes, and contain a localised artifact that produces hemispheric asymmetry in tract density. The paper frames the result as the first successful demonstration of white-matter pathway reconstruction at 64 mT.

Load-bearing premise

The correction for the scanner's inhomogeneous magnetic field assumes the field gradient only rescales the strength of diffusion encoding and does not rotate its direction; near the edge of the field of view the static gradient is large enough that this could bias every corrected map and tractogram.

Editorial extensions

If this is right

  • Portable 0.064 T MRI can produce tractograms of major association, projection, and commissural bundles within a one-hour protocol.
  • Diffusion-weighted fast spin-echo, with isotropic resolution and long echo trains, is a viable tractography sequence at ultra-low field.
  • Automated ROI and prior-based tracking methods transfer to ULF data, reducing operator dependence in tract extraction.
  • ULF-derived FA and MD maps align with single-shell high-field data, though peripheral white matter shows reduced anisotropy from the elevated noise floor.
  • Tractometry at ULF is identified as the next target, contingent on reducing the remaining field-gradient and eddy-current artefacts.

Reading between the lines

Editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • The residual hemispheric asymmetry and localised hypointensity after the scalar correction suggest that a full b-matrix treatment, including rotation of the encoding direction, would remove the remaining bias; this can be tested on the same acquisition.
  • A participant-specific in vivo field map, instead of a phantom-derived one, would test whether the correction's stability assumption is the limiting factor at the periphery of the field of view.
  • The same acquisition and correction chain could be transferred to longitudinal or bedside studies in populations that cannot be scanned at high field, but five healthy adults is not enough to establish reproducibility across ages or pathology.
  • Pairing ULF tractography with other low-field quantitative contrasts could yield a multi-contrast microstructural battery on a single portable device.
Share X Bluesky LinkedIn Reddit HN

Signed reviews

No signed human review yet.

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, and a circularity audit.

Referee Report

3 major / 4 minor

Summary. The paper reports a feasibility study of diffusion tensor MRI and spherical-deconvolution tractography on a commercial 0.064 T portable scanner. Five healthy adults were scanned with a 3D diffusion-weighted fast spin-echo sequence (18 diffusion directions, b=945 s/mm²) and with a high-field 3 T reference protocol. The authors apply retrospective corrections for B0 inhomogeneity, perform DTI and multi-tissue CSD, and generate tractograms with manual ROIs, TractSeg, and tract-orientation mapping. They report that most major white matter bundles can be retrieved in clinically tolerable scan times, and that scalar maps and fibre orientation distributions show good agreement with high-field references, based on visual comparisons of a representative subject.

Significance. If substantiated, this would be a valuable demonstration that tractography is feasible at ultra-low field, with implications for accessible neuroimaging in resource-limited settings. The strengths of the paper include the use of a commercial scanner, a detailed acquisition and processing pipeline, multiple tractography approaches, and a high-field validation dataset from the same participants. The feasibility of retrieving major bundles is supported by the example tractograms. However, the comparative claims of 'strong correspondence' and 'good agreement' are currently supported only by qualitative visual assessment, and several methodological approximations (B0 correction, manual noise tuning) limit the strength of the conclusions. The paper is a promising proof-of-concept that requires quantitative validation or tempered claims.

major comments (3)
  1. [Abstract and Sections 3.1–3.2] The central comparative claim that ULF scalar maps and fODFs show 'strong correspondence' and 'good agreement' with high-field references rests entirely on visual inspection of a single representative subject. No quantitative metrics (e.g., voxelwise correlation, RMSE, Dice/bundle overlap, streamline counts, or FA/MD differences) are reported for the five participants, and no group-level statistics are provided. The Discussion itself concedes that 'the encouraging results shown must be validated against high field data in a range of populations before this approach can be endorsed,' which weakens the abstract's assertion of 'reliable tractography.' Please either provide quantitative comparative analyses across the full cohort or substantially temper the wording of the claims.
  2. [Section 2.3.2 and Appendix Eq. (8)] The B0 inhomogeneity correction assumes that the background gradient acts only as a scalar multiplicative scaling of the b-value, neglecting rotation of the effective encoding direction. The paper acknowledges that near the edge of the FOV (8 cm from isocentre) the static gradient is about 7% of the prescribed diffusion encoding gradient, where the 20:1 ratio used to justify negligible rotation does not hold. The residual spatially varying artifacts described in Section 3.3 (Figure 9) may in part reflect this neglected rotation. Please add a sensitivity analysis or apply a full spatially varying b-matrix correction to assess whether the scalar approximation biases FA, MD, or tractography in the affected regions; at minimum, state this limitation more prominently.
  3. [Section 2.3.5] The RESTORE tensor fitting uses noise levels that were 'initially estimated with the DIPY estimatesigma method, then manually adjusted to maximise visual consistency.' This introduces a subjective, undocumented step into the estimation of all DTI-derived metrics and, indirectly, tractography. The claim of 'robust assessments of white matter microstructure' in the abstract requires that results are not dependent on this manual adjustment. Please report the range of adjustments applied, perform a sensitivity analysis using only the automated estimate, or use a fully automated noise estimation procedure.
minor comments (4)
  1. [Section 2.2] The text says phase encoding was 'oversampled by 166%' and later that 'Oversampling ratios from 400% to 100% (Nyquist limit) were tested'; it would be clearer to define the oversampling factor explicitly and indicate which value was used for the reported results.
  2. [Section 2.3.2] The sentence 'this can lead to errors of 16.1% in the ADC' begins with a lowercase 'this' after a period; please correct the typo.
  3. [Section 2.3.4] Please specify how many voxels were manually selected for the corpus callosum response function and whether a single or multiple ROIs were used, for reproducibility.
  4. [Section 3.1] The comparison of fODFs in Figure 3 would be strengthened by reporting a quantitative measure of fODF similarity (e.g., angular correlation or cosine similarity) between ULF and HF, even if only for the representative subject.

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged · score 1.0 of 10

No significant circularity; the derivation chain is self-contained, with minor subjective steps but no constructional equivalence.

full rationale

The paper's derivation chain was examined for circular reductions. The B0 inhomogeneity correction (Eq. 2, Appendix Eq. 8) is not circular: the scaling factor a(r) is estimated from a separately acquired phantom fieldmap and the b=0 image, and the corrected signal is a deterministic algebraic function of those measured inputs; it is not fitted to the tractography outcome or to the scalar maps being claimed. The response function used for CSD is estimated from manually selected corpus callosum voxels, which is a standard model assumption rather than a parameter fitted to the target prediction; the fODFs are subsequently compared against an independent high-field reference, so they do not reduce to their own input. The manual adjustment of noise levels 'to maximise visual consistency' and the reliance on visual inspection for the HF comparison are subjective and weaken the evidence, but they do not make any claimed result equivalent by construction to its inputs. The self-citations (e.g., refs. 4, 11, 47) are background reports on earlier ULF-DWI/DTI work and are not load-bearing for the present tractography claim, nor is any 'uniqueness theorem' invoked. The absence of quantitative tractography or scalar-map agreement metrics is a correctness/validity limitation, not a circularity. Overall, no prediction or first-principles result in the paper is constructed from the target it is supposed to derive; the central feasibility claim rests on example tractograms and independent HF reference data. Score 1 reflects minor non-circular subjectivity, not circularity.

Assumptions & free parameters 3 free parameters · 4 assumptions · 0 invented entities

The central claim depends on standard diffusion MRI models (mono-exponential signal, constrained spherical deconvolution) and on scanner-specific corrections whose assumptions are only partially validated. No new physical entities are introduced; the main free choices are manual adjustment of noise level, response function voxels, and acquisition oversampling.

free parameters (3)
  • Noise sigma for RESTORE tensor fitting = Not specified
    Section 2.3.5 states noise levels were initially estimated with DIPY estimatesigma, then manually adjusted to maximise visual consistency. This hand-tuned input affects FA and MD maps and downstream fODFs.
  • Phase oversampling ratio = 166% final; range 400% to 100% tested
    Section 2.2 describes testing oversampling ratios and choosing the final value based on artifact appearance and scan time trade-offs. This is an acquisition parameter chosen by the authors.
  • Response function seed voxels = Manual corpus callosum midline selection
    Section 2.3.4: single-fibre response functions were estimated from manually selected voxels in the corpus callosum. This choice directly shapes the MSMT-CSD fODFs used for tractography.
assumptions (4)
  • domain assumption The diffusion signal follows a mono-exponential Stejskal-Tanner model, S = S0 exp(-bD), at b = 945 s/mm2.
    Used in Section 2.3.2 and the Appendix Eq. 8 to derive the B0 correction, and in the DTI fit. This ignores non-Gaussian diffusion and exchange effects, which are usually small at this b-value but still an idealization.
  • domain assumption The effect of the static B0 gradient on diffusion encoding is fully described by a scalar b-value scaling with negligible rotation of the encoding direction.
    Stated in Section 2.3.2 and Appendix Eqs. 4-8. The authors acknowledge rotation is nonzero and depends on the ratio of gradients; at 8 cm from isocentre the static gradient is about 7% of the prescribed gradient, weakening the stated 20:1 ratio justification.
  • domain assumption The phantom-acquired B0 fieldmap remains valid for all in vivo scans and throughout the long acquisition.
    The prospective fieldmap is described in Section 2.2. The scanner center frequency is recentered between DWI pairs to address drift, but the spatial field-gradient map is assumed stable and participant-independent.
  • domain assumption Response functions estimated from corpus callosum voxels are representative single-fibre responses for all white matter in MSMT-CSD.
    Section 2.3.4 uses manual corpus callosum midline selection for response function estimation. If these voxels contain crossing fibres or partial voluming, the deconvolution and resulting fODFs will be biased.

how reviews work

0 comments
Cite this review

Pith. "Pith review of Diffusion Tensor MRI and Spherical-Deconvolution-Based Tractography on an Ultra-Low Field Portable MRI System." pith.science (2026). https://pith.science/paper/WLFFEVKS

@misc{pith2026250604473,
  author       = {Pith},
  title        = {Pith review of: Diffusion Tensor MRI and Spherical-Deconvolution-Based Tractography on an Ultra-Low Field Portable MRI System},
  year         = {2026},
  howpublished = {\url{https://pith.science/paper/WLFFEVKS}},
  note         = {Machine review of arXiv:2506.04473}
}
read the original abstract

Ultra-low-field (ULF) MRI is emerging as an alternative modality to high-field (HF) MRI due to its lower cost, minimal siting requirements, portability, and enhanced accessibility factors that enable large-scale deployment. Although ULF-MRI exhibits lower signal-to-noise ratio (SNR), advanced imaging and data-driven denoising methods enabled by high-performance computing have made contrasts like diffusion-weighted imaging (DWI) feasible at ULF. This study investigates the potential and limitations of ULF tractography, using data acquired on a 0.064 T commercially available mobile point-of-care MRI scanner. The results demonstrate that most major white matter bundles can be successfully retrieved in healthy adult brains within clinically tolerable scan times. This study also examines the recovery of diffusion tensor imaging (DTI)-derived scalar maps, including fractional anisotropy and mean diffusivity. Strong correspondence is observed between scalar maps obtained with ULF-MRI and those acquired at high field strengths. Furthermore, fibre orientation distribution functions reconstructed from ULF data show good agreement with high-field references, supporting the feasibility of using ULF-MRI for reliable tractography. These findings open new opportunities to use ULF-MRI in studies of brain health, development, and disease progression particularly in populations traditionally underserved due to geographic or economic constraints. The results show that robust assessments of white matter microstructure can be achieved with ULF-MRI, effectively democratising microstructural MRI and extending advanced imaging capabilities to a broader range of research and clinical settings where resources are typically limited.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2506.04473 by the authors.

Figure 1
Figure 1. Schematic description of the processing pipeline employed to generate corrected and combined [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p005_1.png] view at source ↗
Figure 2
Figure 2. Comparison of quantitative diffusion be￾tween high- (B,D, and F) and ultra-low-field (A, C, and E) measures obtained in the same subject in sagittal, coronal and axial planes. High field measures used 30 directions at b=1200 s /mm 2 . A,B: diffusion encoded colour maps, weighted by FA. Distinct asymmetry is observed between left and right hemispheres in ULF data. This may arise from different spatial noise depen￾den… view at source ↗
Figure 3
Figure 3. Comparison of fibre orientation distribution plots computed in the same representative subject [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p010_3.png] view at source ↗
Figures from the paper (6 more)
Figure 4
Figure 4. Figure 4: Fibre ODFs and major association tracts retrieved at ULF using manual ROI selection; (A,B) [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p011_4.png]
Figure 5
Figure 5. Figure 5: Cinematic renderings of wholebrain tractography obtained using TractSeg, showing how they [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p012_5.png]
Figure 6
Figure 6. Figure 6: Whole-brain automated tracking conducted with TractSeg. [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p013_6.png]
Figure 7
Figure 7. Figure 7: Selection of major WM tracts in a single hemisphere of the brain retrieved using automated [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p014_7.png]
Figure 8
Figure 8. Figure 8: TractSeg-derived tracking of the superior longitudinal fasciculus, reconstructing the SLF I [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p014_8.png]
Figure 9
Figure 9. Figure 9: Localised artifact (white arrow) in fODF maps (A) and corresponding hypointensity visible in [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p015_9.png]

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Forward citations

Cited by 1 Pith paper

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score. Full citation record

  1. GenTract: Generative Global Tractography

    cs.CV 2025-11 conditional novelty 6.0 of 10

    A generative model that creates entire brain streamline tracts conditioned on whole-brain diffusion MRI, achieving higher precision than prior tractography methods, particularly on degraded data.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

52 extracted references · 49 canonical work pages · cited by 1 Pith paper

  1. [1]

    & Leemans, A

    Dell’Acqua, F., Descoteaux, M. & Leemans, A. Handbook of Diffusion MR Tractography: Imaging Methods, Biophysical Models, Algorithms and Applications.Handbook of Diffusion MR Tractogra- phy: Imaging Methods, Biophysical Models, Algorithms and Applications,1–727 (Jan. 2024)

    work page 2024

  2. [2]

    J., Pajevic, S

    Catani, M., Howard, R. J., Pajevic, S. & Jones, D. K. Virtual in Vivo interactive dissection of white matter fasciculi in the human brain.NeuroImage17,77–94.issn: 10538119.https://pubmed. ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/12482069/(1 2002)

    work page arXiv 2002

  3. [3]

    M., Bastiani, M., Veraart, J., Garyfallidis, E

    Tax, C. M., Bastiani, M., Veraart, J., Garyfallidis, E. & Irfanoglu, M. O. What’s new and what’s next in diffusion MRI preprocessing.NeuroImage249.issn: 1095-9572.https://pubmed.ncbi. nlm.nih.gov/34965454/(Apr. 2022). 16

    work page arXiv 2022

  4. [4]

    Tensors and Tracts at 64 mTinISMRM Workshop on Diffusion MRI: From Research to Clinic(Amsterdam, The Netherlands, 2022)

    Plumley, A.et al. Tensors and Tracts at 64 mTinISMRM Workshop on Diffusion MRI: From Research to Clinic(Amsterdam, The Netherlands, 2022)

    work page 2022

  5. [5]

    Diffusion Tensor Imaging at 0.05 TinProceedings of the International Society for Magnetic Resonance in Medicine 2024(2024)

    Ding, Y.et al. Diffusion Tensor Imaging at 0.05 TinProceedings of the International Society for Magnetic Resonance in Medicine 2024(2024)

    work page 2024

  6. [6]

    Jones, D. K. Optimal Approaches to Diffusion MRI Acquisition.Diffusion MRI,250–271.https: //academic.oup.com/book/24921/chapter/188777735(Nov. 2010)

    work page arXiv 2010

  7. [7]

    A.et al.Abstract 57: Deployment of Portable, Bedside, Low-Field Magnetic Resonance Imaging for Evaluation of Stroke Patients.Stroke51.issn: 0039-2499.https://www.ahajournals

    Cahn, B. A.et al.Abstract 57: Deployment of Portable, Bedside, Low-Field Magnetic Resonance Imaging for Evaluation of Stroke Patients.Stroke51.issn: 0039-2499.https://www.ahajournals. org/doi/10.1161/str.51.suppl.1.57(Suppl-1 Feb. 2020)

    work page doi:10.1161/str.51.suppl.1.57(suppl-1

  8. [8]

    org/doi/10.1161/str.55.suppl.1.128(Suppl-1 Feb

    Sorby-Adams, A.et al.Abstract 128: Multi-Direction Diffusion Weighted Imaging on Portable, Low-Field Magnetic Resonance Imaging.Stroke55.issn: 0039-2499.https://www.ahajournals. org/doi/10.1161/str.55.suppl.1.128(Suppl-1 Feb. 2024)

    work page doi:10.1161/str.55.suppl.1.128(suppl-1

Show all 52 references
  1. [9]

    Squashing peanuts and smashing pumpkins

    Jones, D. K. & Basser, P. J. “Squashing peanuts and smashing pumpkins”: How noise distorts diffusion-weighted MR data.Magnetic Resonance in Medicine52,979–993.issn: 1522-2594.https: / / onlinelibrary . wiley . com / doi / full / 10 . 1002 / mrm . 20283 % 20https : / / onlineli...

    doi

  2. [10]

    J.et al.Spherical Deconvolution of Multichannel Diffusion MRI Data with Non-Gaussian Noise Models and Spatial Regularization.PLOS ONE10,e0138910.issn: 1932-6203

    Canales-Rodr ´ ıguez, E. J.et al.Spherical Deconvolution of Multichannel Diffusion MRI Data with Non-Gaussian Noise Models and Spatial Regularization.PLOS ONE10,e0138910.issn: 1932-6203. https://journals.plos.org/plosone/article?id=10.1371/journal.pone.0138910(10 Oct. 2015)

    1932 doi

  3. [11]

    Diffusion-Weighted Imaging at 0.064 TinProceedings of the International Society for Magnetic Resonance in Medicine 2022(2022)

    O’Halloran, R.et al. Diffusion-Weighted Imaging at 0.064 TinProceedings of the International Society for Magnetic Resonance in Medicine 2022(2022)

    2022

  4. [12]

    J.et al.N4ITK: Improved N3 Bias Correction.IEEE transactions on medical imaging 29,1310.issn: 02780062.https : / / pmc

    Tustison, N. J.et al.N4ITK: Improved N3 Bias Correction.IEEE transactions on medical imaging 29,1310.issn: 02780062.https : / / pmc . ncbi . nlm . nih . gov / articles / PMC3071855/(6 June 2010)

    2010

  5. [13]

    & Jones, D

    Leemans, A. & Jones, D. K. The B-matrix must be rotated when correcting for subject motion in DTI data.Magnetic resonance in medicine61,1336–1349.issn: 1522-2594.https://pubmed. ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/19319973/(6 2009)

    2009

  6. [14]

    Iglesias, J. E.et al.Joint super-resolution and synthesis of 1 mm isotropic MP-RAGE volumes from clinical MRI exams with scans of different orientation, resolution and contrast.NeuroIm- age237,118206.issn: 1053-8119.https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/ S105381192...

    2021

  7. [15]

    Iglesias, J. E.et al.Quantitative Brain Morphometry of Portable Low-Field-Strength MRI Us- ing Super-Resolution Machine Learning.Radiology306.doi: 10.1148/radiol.220522, e220522.issn: 0033-8419.https://doi.org/10.1148/radiol.220522(3 Nov. 2022)

    doi

  8. [16]

    Iglesias, J. E.et al.SynthSR: A public AI tool to turn heterogeneous clinical brain scans into high-resolution T1-weighted images for 3D morphometry.Science Advances9.doi: 10.1126/sci- adv.add3607, eadd3607.https://doi.org/10.1126/sciadv.add3607(5 Nov. 2023)

    doi

  9. [17]

    E., Tournier, J

    Smith, R. E., Tournier, J. D., Calamante, F. & Connelly, A. Anatomically-constrained tractography: Improved diffusion MRI streamlines tractography through effective use of anatomical information. NeuroImage62,1924–1938.issn: 1053-8119 (3 Sept. 2012)

    1924

  10. [18]

    L., Neelin, P., Peters, T

    Collins, D. L., Neelin, P., Peters, T. M. & Evans, A. C. Automatic 3D intersubject registration of MR volumetric data in standardized Talairach space.Journal of computer assisted tomography. issn: 0363-8715.https://www.scienceopen.com/document?vid=25d2ff94- 4ac7- 4b7c- 8afc- b...

    1994

  11. [19]

    & Sereno, M

    Dale, A., Fischl, B. & Sereno, M. I. Cortical Surface-Based Analysis: I. Segmentation and Surface Reconstruction.NeuroImage9,179–194 (1999)

    1999

  12. [20]

    Fischl, B., Sereno, M. I. & Dale, A. Cortical Surface-Based Analysis: II: Inflation, Flattening, and a Surface-Based Coordinate System.NeuroImage9,195–207 (1999)

    1999

  13. [21]

    & Dale, A

    Fischl, B., Liu, A. & Dale, A. M. Automated manifold surgery: constructing geometrically accurate and topologically correct models of the human cerebral cortex.IEEE Medical Imaging20,70–80 (Jan. 2001). 17

    2001

  14. [22]

    Fischl, B.et al.Whole brain segmentation: automated labeling of neuroanatomical structures in the human brain.Neuron33,341–355 (2002)

    2002

  15. [23]

    Fischl, B.et al.Sequence-independent segmentation of magnetic resonance images.NeuroImage 23.Mathematics in Brain Imaging, S69–S84.issn: 1053-8119.http://www.sciencedirect.com/ science/article/B6WNP-4DCMGVT-2/2/7eee26326dc63f931b826eac33becc8b(2004)

    2004

  16. [24]

    D.et al.MRtrix3: A fast, flexible and open software framework for medical image processing and visualisation.NeuroImage202,116137.issn: 1053-8119 (Nov

    Tournier, J. D.et al.MRtrix3: A fast, flexible and open software framework for medical image processing and visualisation.NeuroImage202,116137.issn: 1053-8119 (Nov. 2019)

    2019

  17. [25]

    C., Jones, D

    Chang, L. C., Jones, D. K. & Pierpaoli, C. RESTORE: Robust estimation of tensors by outlier rejection.Magnetic Resonance in Medicine53,1088–1095.issn: 07403194./doi/pdf/10.1002/ mrm.20426%20https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/abs/10.1002/mrm.20426%20https: //onlinelibrary.wile...

    doi

  18. [26]

    W., Lu, Y

    Chung, S. W., Lu, Y. & Henry, R. G. Comparison of bootstrap approaches for estimation of uncer- tainties of DTI parameters.NeuroImage33,531–541.issn: 1053-8119 (2 Nov. 2006)

    2006

  19. [27]

    & Fischl, B

    Yendiki, A., Koldewyn, K., Kakunoori, S., Kanwisher, N. & Fischl, B. Spurious group differences due to head motion in a diffusion MRI study.NeuroImage88,79–90.issn: 1053-8119 (Mar. 2014)

    2014

  20. [28]

    Garyfallidis, E.et al.Dipy, a library for the analysis of diffusion MRI data.Frontiers in Neuroin- formatics8,71423.issn: 16625196 (FEB Feb. 2014)

    2014

  21. [29]

    Koay, C. G. & Basser, P. J. Analytically exact correction scheme for signal extraction from noisy magnitude MR signals.Journal of Magnetic Resonance179,317–322.issn: 1090-7807 (2 Apr. 2006)

    2006

  22. [30]

    Park, S., Witten, J. M. & Myers, K. J. Singular vectors of a linear imaging system as efficient channels for the Bayesian ideal observer.IEEE Transactions on Medical Imaging28,657–668. issn: 02780062 (5 May 2009)

    2009

  23. [31]

    D., Dhollander, T., Connelly, A

    Jeurissen, B., Tournier, J. D., Dhollander, T., Connelly, A. & Sijbers, J. Multi-tissue constrained spherical deconvolution for improved analysis of multi-shell diffusion MRI data.NeuroImage103, 411–426.issn: 1095-9572.https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/25109526/(Dec. 2014)

    2014

  24. [32]

    E.et al.Tracking neuronal fiber pathways in the living human brain.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America96,10422–10427.issn: 0027-8424

    Conturo, T. E.et al.Tracking neuronal fiber pathways in the living human brain.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America96,10422–10427.issn: 0027-8424. https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/10468624/(18 Aug. 1999)

    1999

  25. [33]

    & Mansi, T

    Comaniciu, D., Engel, K., Georgescu, B. & Mansi, T. Shaping the future through innovations: From medical imaging to precision medicine.Medical Image Analysis33,19–26.issn: 1361-8415 (Oct. 2016)

    2016

  26. [34]

    Dappa, E.et al.Cinematic rendering – an alternative to volume rendering for 3D computed tomog- raphy imaging.Insights into Imaging7,849–856.issn: 18694101.https://link.springer.com/ articles/10.1007/s13244- 016- 0518- 1%20https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/ s13244-016-0...

    doi

  27. [35]

    Magnetic Resonance Imaging30,1323–1341.issn: 0730-725X (9 Nov

    Fedorov, A.et al.3D Slicer as an image computing platform for the Quantitative Imaging Network. Magnetic Resonance Imaging30,1323–1341.issn: 0730-725X (9 Nov. 2012)

    2012

  28. [36]

    & Lorensen, B.The Visualization Toolkit (4th ed.)isbn: 978-1-930934- 19-1 (Kitware, 2006)

    Schroeder, W., Martin, K. & Lorensen, B.The Visualization Toolkit (4th ed.)isbn: 978-1-930934- 19-1 (Kitware, 2006)

    2006

  29. [37]

    & Maier-Hein, K

    Wasserthal, J., Neher, P. & Maier-Hein, K. H. TractSeg - Fast and accurate white matter tract segmentation.NeuroImage183,239–253.issn: 1053-8119 (Dec. 2018)

    2018

  30. [38]

    Wasserthal, J., Neher, P. F. & Maier-Hein, K. H. Tract orientation mapping for bundle-specific tractography.Lecture Notes in Computer Science (including subseries Lecture Notes in Artificial Intelligence and Lecture Notes in Bioinformatics)11072 LNCS,36–44.issn: 16113349.https...

    2018 doi

  31. [39]

    B.et al.The importance of correcting for signal drift in diffusion MRI.Magnetic Resonance in Medicine77,285–299.issn: 15222594 (1 Jan

    Vos, S. B.et al.The importance of correcting for signal drift in diffusion MRI.Magnetic Resonance in Medicine77,285–299.issn: 15222594 (1 Jan. 2017)

    2017

  32. [40]

    L., Skare, S

    Andersson, J. L., Skare, S. & Ashburner, J. How to correct susceptibility distortions in spin- echo echo-planar images: Application to diffusion tensor imaging.NeuroImage20,870–888.issn: 10538119.https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/14568458/(2 Oct. 2003). 18

    2003

  33. [41]

    Andersson, J. L. & Sotiropoulos, S. N. An integrated approach to correction for off-resonance effects and subject movement in diffusion MR imaging.NeuroImage125,1063–1078.issn: 1053-8119 (Jan. 2016)

    2016

  34. [42]

    L., Graham, M

    Andersson, J. L., Graham, M. S., Zsoldos, E. & Sotiropoulos, S. N. Incorporating outlier detec- tion and replacement into a non-parametric framework for movement and distortion correction of diffusion MR images.NeuroImage141,556–572.issn: 1053-8119 (Nov. 2016)

    2016

  35. [43]

    M.et al.Advances in functional and structural MR image analysis and implementation as FSL.NeuroImage23 Suppl 1.issn: 1053-8119.https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/15501092/ (SUPPL

    Smith, S. M.et al.Advances in functional and structural MR image analysis and implementation as FSL.NeuroImage23 Suppl 1.issn: 1053-8119.https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/15501092/ (SUPPL. 1 2004)

    2004

  36. [44]

    issn: 10959572.https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC5159209/(Nov

    Veraart, J.et al.Denoising of diffusion MRI using random matrix theory.NeuroImage142,394. issn: 10959572.https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC5159209/(Nov. 2016)

    2016

  37. [45]

    Kellner, E., Dhital, B., Kiselev, V. G. & Reisert, M. Gibbs-ringing artifact removal based on local subvoxel-shifts.Magnetic Resonance in Medicine76,1574–1581.issn: 15222594.https://pubmed. ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/26745823/(5 Nov. 2016)

    2016

  38. [46]

    Dhollander, T., Raffelt, D. & Connelly, A.Unsupervised 3-tissue response function estimation from single-shell or multi-shell diffusion MR data without a co-registered T1 imageinISMRM Work- shop on Breaking the Barriers of Diffusion MRI(2016).https : / / www . researchgate . n...

    2016

  39. [47]

    Connectomics at 64 mTinProceedings of the International Society for Magnetic Resonance in Medicine 2024(2024)

    Planchuelo-Gomez, A.et al. Connectomics at 64 mTinProceedings of the International Society for Magnetic Resonance in Medicine 2024(2024)

    2024

  40. [48]

    Balaji, S.et al.Magnetization transfer imaging using non-balanced SSFP at ultra-low field.Magnetic Resonance in Medicine.issn: 15222594 (2025)

    2025

  41. [49]

    Lena, B.et al. Reproducibility and repeatability of rapid T1 mapping of brain tissues at 64 mT: a multicenter studyinProceedings of the International Society for Magnetic Resonance in Medicine 2025(2025)

    2025

  42. [50]

    C., Walker, L

    Chang, L. C., Walker, L. & Pierpaoli, C. Informed RESTORE: A method for robust estima- tion of diffusion tensor from low redundancy datasets in the presence of physiological noise ar- tifacts.Magnetic Resonance in Medicine68,1654–1663.issn: 15222594./doi / pdf / 10 . 1002 / mr...

    doi

  43. [51]

    Zhou, X.et al.Reduction of ringing and blurring artifacts in fast spin-echo imaging.Journal of Magnetic Resonance Imaging3,803–807.issn: 15222586 (5 1993)

    1993

  44. [52]

    Oouchi, H.et al.Diffusion Anisotropy Measurement of Brain White Matter Is Affected by Voxel Size: Underestimation Occurs in Areas with Crossing Fibers.AJNR: American Journal of Neuroradiology 28,1102.issn: 01956108.https : / / pmc . ncbi . nlm . nih . gov / articles / PMC81341...

    2007

Pith tools

Reviewed August 7, 2026 · model on record in the stance chip above.