pith. sign in

arxiv: 1703.05923 · v2 · pith:WMBEXQ74new · submitted 2017-03-17 · 🧮 math.AG

Some non-special cubic fourfolds

classification 🧮 math.AG
keywords cubicdivisornoether-lefschetzdivisorsfourfoldsapolarconsideredconsisting
0
0 comments X
read the original abstract

In [1309.1899], Ranestad and Voisin showed, quite surprisingly, that the divisor in the moduli space of cubic fourfolds consisting of cubics "apolar to a Veronese surface" is not a Noether-Lefschetz divisor. We give an independent proof of this by exhibiting an explicit cubic fourfold X in the divisor and using point counting methods over finite fields to show X is Noether-Lefschetz general. We also show that two other divisors considered in [ibid.] are not Noether-Lefschetz divisors.

This paper has not been read by Pith yet.

discussion (0)

Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.