Pith. sign in

REVIEW 2 major objections 4 minor 70 references

Strong dissipativity of generalized time-fractional derivatives and quasi-linear (stochastic) partial differential equations

T0 review · 2 major / 4 minor · reviewed 2026-08-14 · deepseek-v4-flash

Challenge this review Re-run · record.json Download PDF Read on arXiv ↗ Review JSON

Pith's one-line read The paper proves a strong dissipativity estimate for every admissible generalized time-fractional derivative and uses it to establish unique solvability of weakly monotone quasilinear evolution equations, including stochastic variants…

desk verdict The dissipativity core is new and convincing, but the uniqueness claim in Theorem 2.2(i) is false as stated: global solutions can differ freely outside [0,T], so the [0,∞) identity in the proof cannot hold. read the letter →

arxiv 1908.03959 v3 pith:WNAN3A2B submitted 2019-08-11 math.AP math.FAmath.PR

Wei Liu , Michael Röckner , José Luís da Silva This is my paper · ORCID
classification math.APmath.FAmath.PR MSC 35R1160H1535K5976S0526A3345K0535K92
keywords generalizedtime-fractionalderivativeCaputostrongdissipativityGelfandtripleweakmonotonicityporousmediumequationp-LaplacestochasticPDE
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal

The pith

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The reading

This paper aims to show that generalized time-fractional derivatives—operators of the form $\partial^{*k}_t u = \frac{d}{dt}(k*u)$, where $k$ is any nonnegative, nonincreasing, locally integrable kernel—are strongly dissipative when viewed on path spaces weighted by $e^{-\gamma t}$. The central estimate controls the weighted $L^2$ norm of a path by an explicit positive constant $\psi_k(\gamma)$ attached to the kernel. The payoff is existence and uniqueness for nonlinear evolution equations $\partial^{*k}_t(u-u_0)+A(t,u)=f$ on a Gelfand triple, assuming only that $A$ is weakly monotone rather than monotone, and the same for a stochastic version with additive convolution noise. If correct, this covers time-fractional porous medium, fast diffusion, and $p$-Laplace equations, with ordinary or fractional Laplace operators, for which earlier subordination-based and monotone-operator methods did not apply.

What carries the argument

The load-bearing object is the pair $(k,\psi_k)$: the kernel $k$ determines a measure $M_k$ by $k(s)=M_k((s,\infty))$, and $\psi_k(\gamma)=\int_{(0,\infty)}(1-e^{-\gamma\tau})M_k(d\tau)$ is a Bernstein function. The semigroup $(U^k_t)_{t\ge0}$ defined by convolution with the corresponding subordinator measures contracts the weighted norm $\|u\|_{L^2_\gamma}$ with rate $e^{-\psi_k(\gamma)t}$, and its generator is exactly $-\partial^{*k}_t$ on the domain $F_k$, the closure of the generator as an operator from $V$ to $V^*$. The dissipativity estimate is the derivative of that contraction at $t=0$; it is what lets the paper absorb the weak monotonicity term $C_1\|u_1-u_2\|_H^2$ into the time-fractional part of the equation.

What would settle it

For the linear scalar equation with a kernel from Example 6.2 and $A(t,u)=C u$, the solution is explicit through Laplace transforms; checking whether two different initial values can produce the same path on $[0,T]$ would decide the uniqueness claim directly. The dissipativity estimate itself can also be checked explicitly on exponentials $u(s)=e^{-\lambda s}h$, where both sides reduce to elementary functions of $\psi_k(\gamma)$.

Watch

Extended reading notes

Core claim

The central discovery is that $-\partial^{*k}_t$ is the generator of a $C_0$-semigroup of contractions on the half-line path space $L^2([0,\infty);H)$, acting by convolution with subordinator measures whose Laplace transform is $e^{-t\psi_k(\gamma)}$. Here $\psi_k$ is the Bernstein function associated with the kernel, explicitly $\psi_k(\gamma)=\int_{(0,\infty)}(1-e^{-\gamma\tau})M_k(d\tau)$, where $M_k$ is the unique measure with $k(s)=M_k((s,\infty))$. From this semigroup representation the paper proves the strong dissipativity estimate $\int_0^\infty {}_{V^*}\langle\partial^{*k}_t u(s),u(s)\rangle_V e^{-\gamma s}\,ds \ge \frac12\psi_k(\gamma)\int_0^\infty \|u(s)\|_H^2 e^{-\gamma s}\,ds$ for every $u$ in $F_k$, the kernel-adapted Sobolev space. The estimate turns the weak monotonicity constant $C_1$ into a solvability condition: if $\psi_k(\gamma)>2C_1$ for some weight $\gamma$, the map $u\mapsto\partial^{*k}_t u+A(\cdot,u)$ is surjective from $F_k$ onto the weighted dual path space, and the solution is unique. For the classical Caputo kernel $k(t)=t^{-\beta}/\Gamma(1-\beta)$, $\psi_k(\gamma)=\gamma^\beta$, so the condition is $\gamma^\beta>2C_1$; even for this special case the strict dissipativity gives a uniqueness proof the authors say was missing in earlier work.

Load-bearing premise

The argument needs the two candidate solutions to be treated as global paths satisfying the equation on the whole half-line when the half-line dissipativity estimate is applied, even though the theorem states the differential equation only for dt-a.e. $t\in[0,T]$; that local-to-global justification is not supplied.

Editorial extensions

If this is right

  • For every admissible nonincreasing kernel $k$—including the Caputo, distributed-order, truncated $\beta$-stable, gamma, and multi-term kernels—equation (2.1) has a unique solution whenever $\psi_k(\gamma)>2C_1$ for some $\gamma$.
  • The result applies to generalized time-fractional porous medium and fast diffusion equations with ordinary or fractional Laplacian, and to time-fractional $p$-Laplace equations, none of which were covered by earlier existence theory for quasilinear equations with fractional time derivatives.
  • The stochastic version with additive convolution-type noise is well-posed: shifting by the stochastic convolution reduces it to the deterministic theorem, giving a unique adapted solution path-by-path.
  • When the kernel admits a Sonine partner $\tilde{k}$, the solution also satisfies the equivalent integral (Volterra) form (2.15), and the solution path has a continuous version in $V^*$ if $\tilde{k}$ is locally $\alpha$-integrable.
  • The uniqueness proof works already for the classical Caputo derivative under weak monotonicity, removing the strict monotonicity assumption needed in earlier existence results.

Reading between the lines

Editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • Since the dissipativity constant is explicit in $\psi_k$, the same mechanism gives quantitative weighted decay for differences of solutions; one could read off subdiffusive decay rates for general kernels by comparing $\psi_k(\gamma)$ with the monotonicity constant $C_1$.
  • For singular kernels with $k(0+)=\infty$, the condition $\psi_k(\gamma)>2C_1$ is automatic for large $\gamma$, so the theory is strongest exactly for the strongly memory-like kernels used in fractional calculus; for bounded kernels it becomes a nontrivial constraint, suggesting a trade-off between memory strength and nonlinearity.
  • The stochastic result is obtained by absorbing the noise path into the operator $A$; a testable extension would be to ask whether multiplicative noise $B(t,X_t)dW$ can be handled by the same shift trick when the noise path has enough regularity to preserve (H1)-(H4).
Share X Bluesky LinkedIn Reddit HN

Signed reviews

No signed human review yet.

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, and a circularity audit.

Referee Report

2 major / 4 minor

Summary. The paper develops a semigroup framework for generalized time-fractional derivatives ∂*k_t u = d/dt(k*u), where k is nonnegative, nonincreasing, locally integrable, and vanishing at infinity. It identifies -∂*k_t as the generator of a C0-contraction semigroup on L2([0,∞);H) and proves a strong dissipativity estimate on exponentially weighted path spaces with explicit constant ψ_k(γ) coming from the Lévy/Bernstein representation of k. This estimate is then used, together with a pseudo-monotone operator perturbation theorem proved in the appendix, to obtain existence and uniqueness of weak solutions to quasilinear evolution equations ∂*k_t(u-u0)+A(t,u)=f on [0,T] under weak monotonicity, coercivity, and growth conditions on A, and to obtain an analogous result for an additive-noise stochastic version. Applications to generalized porous medium, p-Laplace, and fast-diffusion equations are discussed.

Significance. If the main theorems were fully established, this would be a valuable and fairly general contribution: it extends earlier monotone-operator results for time-fractional equations to weakly monotone operators and to a broad class of kernels, and it introduces a new mechanism (strong dissipativity of the derivative itself) that is appealing and potentially influential. The semigroup identification and the dissipativity estimate are carefully argued, the perturbation theorem receives a full appendix proof, and the dissipativity constant is explicit and derived from the kernel rather than fitted. The paper is also transparent about the scope of the applications. However, the uniqueness assertion in the main theorem currently fails as stated, which prevents accepting the paper in its present form.

major comments (2)
  1. [Section 4, uniqueness paragraph in proof of Theorem 2.2(i)] The uniqueness proof begins with the identity 0 = ∫_0^∞ V*⟨u1−u2, ∂*k_t(u1−u2)+A(s,u1)−A(s,u2)⟩_V e^{-γs} ds. This identity is justified only if the differential equation (2.1) holds for dt-a.e. s∈[0,∞), but (2.1) is imposed only for dt-a.e. s∈[0,T]. On (T,∞) the integrand has no reason to vanish. The problem is not cosmetic: the uniqueness assertion of Theorem 2.2(i) is false as stated. Take V=H=R, k(t)=t^{-β}/Γ(1−β) for the Caputo kernel, A(t,v)=C1v with C1>0 and ψ_k(γ)>2C1 for some γ, f=0, u0=0, T=1. For any nonzero v∈C_c^∞((1,∞)), u1=0 and u2=v both satisfy (2.1) on [0,1], and both satisfy u_i−u0φ∈F_k for every φ≡1 on [0,2). Applying the displayed identity to this pair would contradict Theorem 2.1(ii) together with (H2). Thus the uniqueness argument as written would prove a false global uniqueness statement, and the uniqueness assertion of Theorem 2.2(i) is not established.
  2. [Theorem 2.2(i) and Theorem 2.3(i)] The gap cannot be closed by a trivial truncation of the difference w=u1−u2 to [0,T]. For Caputo kernels with β≥1/2, multiplication by 1_{[0,T]} does not generally preserve F_k because Λ_k of the truncated function develops a nonintegrable singularity at T; hence Theorem 2.1(ii) cannot be applied to the truncated difference. A finite-interval dissipativity estimate for F_k functions on [0,T] is needed and is not supplied. Since Theorem 2.3(i) is obtained from Theorem 2.2(i) by a shift argument, the stochastic uniqueness assertion inherits the same defect. The paper should either prove such a finite-interval estimate and state uniqueness on [0,T] (rather than on [0,∞)), or remove the uniqueness claims.
minor comments (4)
  1. [Lemma 3.4] In the last displayed integral on the right-hand side, the measure is e^{-γs} ds, not e^{-γs} dt; please correct the variable.
  2. [Proposition 3.2] In the sentence after the Laplace-transform computation, 'in the fifth inequality' should read 'in the fifth equality', since the displayed chain consists of equalities.
  3. [Appendix, Step 2 of proof of Theorem 4.1] The displayed identity 'ΛαnVαnuαn = Λ αnuαn' is false as written. The argument requires the true identity Λ(α_n V_{α_n} u_{α_n}) = Λ_{α_n} u_{α_n}, which follows from Λ V_α = α V_α − I. Please fix the notation.
  4. [Section 4, uniqueness paragraph] The duality pairing is written as V⟨·,·⟩ without the subscript star; use the notation V*⟨·,·⟩_V consistently with Section 2.

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged · score 0.0 of 10

No significant circularity: the dissipativity estimate and well-posedness theorems are derived from the Bernstein-function/semigroup representation of the kernel, with self-citations used only for comparison or reproved in the appendix.

full rationale

I found no circular step. Theorem 2.1(ii) is proved by identifying -∂*k_t with the generator Λ_k of the subordinated shift semigroup U^k_t = ∫ U_s μ^k_t(ds), where μ^k_t is determined by the Laplace identity Lμ^k_t(λ)=e^{-tψ_k(λ)} and ψ_k is defined from the Lévy measure M_k associated with k via (3.1)-(3.3). The key estimate Lemma 3.4 follows from Lemma 3.3 by a limit argument, giving the explicit constant ψ_k(γ)/2; no quantity is fitted to data or defined in terms of the theorem being proved. The existence proof uses the pseudo-monotone surjectivity result Theorem 4.1, and the paper includes a full proof of Theorem 4.1 in Appendix A; the self-reference to the authors' earlier [41] is explicitly accompanied by 'we include a more detailed proof', so it is not load-bearing. The condition ψ_k(γ)>2C1 is a stated assumption, and the paper notes it is always met when lim_{s→0}k(s)=∞, which follows from ψ_k(γ)→∞, not from the conclusion. Uniqueness in Theorem 2.2(i) invokes the dissipativity bound together with weak monotonicity (H2); this is the intended mechanism, not a circular reduction. The gap concerning the identity being written over [0,∞) while the equation holds only on [0,T] is a genuine correctness concern about the uniqueness proof as written, but it is not circularity: it is a domain-extension issue, not a self-referential or fitted-input step. Self-citations to [41] appear in comparisons, in the phrase 'cf. [41]' for a stochastic shift argument, and in background; none supplies the central mathematical content. Accordingly, the circularity score is 0.

Assumptions & free parameters 0 free parameters · 8 assumptions · 0 invented entities

The proof rests on standard semigroup, Bernstein-function, and monotone-operator theory. No empirical free parameters or invented physical entities appear. The main domain assumptions concern A and k; the only unjustified ad hoc premise is the global half-line reading of the local equation in the uniqueness proof.

assumptions (8)
  • standard math Caratheodory's theorem: a nonnegative, non-increasing, right-continuous k with k(s)→0 determines a σ-finite measure M_k on (0,∞) with M_k((s,∞))=k(s).
    Used in Section 3, equation (3.1), to represent every admissible kernel as the tail of a Lévy measure.
  • standard math Bernstein function theory: tψ_k restricted to (0,∞) is a nonnegative Bernstein function, so e^{-tψ_k(λ)} is the Laplace transform of a probability measure μ^k_t.
    Used in Section 3, around (3.5)-(3.7), to define the semigroup U^k_t as convolution with μ^k_t.
  • standard math Reed-Simon Theorem X.49: if the Fourier multiplier of a semigroup generator is at most of linear growth, the smooth domain forms an operator core.
    Used in Proposition 3.1 to identify the generator domain as a Fourier multiplier domain.
  • standard math Pseudo-monotone, bounded on bounded sets, coercive operators on a reflexive Banach space are surjective.
    Used in Lemma A.3 to solve the approximating equations in the proof of Theorem 4.1.
  • domain assumption A(t,·): V→V* is Borel measurable and satisfies (H1)-(H4) with α∈(1,∞), δ>0, C1,C2≥0 and g∈L^1.
    These are the structural hypotheses defining the class of weakly monotone operators the theorem applies to.
  • domain assumption The kernel k satisfies (k): nonnegative, non-increasing, right-continuous, locally integrable, with lim_{s→∞}k(s)=0, and for integral forms also the Sonine condition (~k).
    Defines the admissible generalized time-fractional derivatives; see Section 2 and the examples in Section 6.
  • domain assumption For Theorem 2.3, the probability space carries a cylindrical Wiener process and B is Hilbert-Schmidt valued and measurable.
    Standard SPDE setup imported in Section 2 before Theorem 2.3.
  • ad hoc to paper The finite-horizon equation (2.1) can be lifted to a global path-space equation on [0,∞) in the uniqueness proof.
    The uniqueness paragraph integrates the equation over [0,∞); the paper neither states this lifting nor proves that local solutions extend without changing A outside [0,T]. This is the flagged gap.

how reviews work

0 comments
Cite this review

Pith. "Pith review of Strong dissipativity of generalized time-fractional derivatives and quasi-linear (stochastic) partial differential equations." pith.science (2026). https://pith.science/paper/WNAN3A2B

@misc{pith2026190803959,
  author       = {Pith},
  title        = {Pith review of: Strong dissipativity of generalized time-fractional derivatives and quasi-linear (stochastic) partial differential equations},
  year         = {2026},
  howpublished = {\url{https://pith.science/paper/WNAN3A2B}},
  note         = {Machine review of arXiv:1908.03959}
}
abstract

In this paper strong dissipativity of generalized time-fractional derivatives on Gelfand triples of properly in time weighted $L^p$-path spaces is proved. In particular, the classical Caputo derivative is included as a special case. As a consequence one obtains the existence and uniqueness of solutions to evolution equations on Gelfand triples with generalized time-fractional derivatives. These equations are of type \begin{equation*} \frac{d}{dt} (k * u)(t) + A(t, u(t)) = f(t), \quad 0<t<T, \end{equation*} with (in general nonlinear) operators $A(t,\cdot)$ satisfying general weak monotonicity conditions. Here $k$ is a non-increasing locally Lebesgue-integrable nonnegative function on $[0, \infty)$ with $\underset{s\rightarrow\infty}{\lim}k(s)=0$. Analogous results for the case, where $f$ is replaced by a time-fractional additive noise, are obtained as well. Applications include generalized time-fractional quasi-linear (stochastic) partial differential equations. In particular, time-fractional (stochastic) porous medium and fast diffusion equations with ordinary or fractional Laplace operators or the time-fractional (stochastic) $p$-Laplace equation are covered.

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

70 extracted references · 70 canonical work pages

  1. [41]

    W. Liu, M. Röckner, and J. L. da Silva. Quasi-linear (sto chastic) partial differential equations with time-fractional derivatives. SIAM J. Math. Anal. , 50(3):2588–2607, 2018

    work page 2018

  2. [1]

    Allen, L

    M. Allen, L. Caffarelli, and A. V asseur. A parabolic prob lem with a fractional time derivative. Arch. Ration. Mech. Anal., 221(2):603–630, 2016. 30 Wei Liu, Michael Röckner, José Luís da Silva

    work page 2016

  3. [2]

    Allouba and Y

    H. Allouba and Y . Xiao. L-Kuramoto-Sivashinsky SPDEs vs . time-fractional SPI- DEs: exact continuity and gradient moduli, 1/2-derivative criticality, and laws. J. Differential Equations, 263(2):1552–1610, 2017

    work page 2017

  4. [3]

    T. M. Atanackovic, S. Pilipovic, and D. Zorica. Time dist ributed-order diffusion- wave equation. I., II. In Proceedings of the Royal Society of London A: Mathe- matical, Physical and Engineering Sciences , volume 465, pages 1869–1891, 1893–

    work page

  5. [4]

    Baeumer and M

    B. Baeumer and M. M. Meerschaert. Stochastic solutions f or fractional Cauchy problems. Fract. Calc. Appl. Anal., 4(4):481–500, 2001

    work page 2001

  6. [5]

    Baeumer, M

    B. Baeumer, M. M. Meerschaert, and E. Nane. Brownian subo rdinators and frac- tional Cauchy problems. Trans. Amer . Math. Soc., 361(7):3915–3930, 2009

    work page 2009

  7. [6]

    Baleanu, K

    D. Baleanu, K. Diethelm, E. Scalas, and J. J. Trujillo. Fractional calculus: Models and numerical methods, volume 3 of Series on Complexity, Nonlinearity and Chaos. World Scientific Publishing Co. Pte. Ltd., Hackensack, NJ, 2 012

    work page

  8. [7]

    V . Barbu. Nonlinear differential equations of monotone types in Bana ch spaces . Springer Monographs in Mathematics. Springer, New Y ork, 2010

    work page 2010

Show all 70 references
  1. [8]

    Barbu and M

    V . Barbu and M. Röckner. An operatorial approach to stoch astic partial differen- tial equations driven by linear multiplicative noise. J. Eur . Math. Soc. (JEMS) , 17(7):1789–1815, 2015

    2015

  2. [9]

    J. Bertoin. Lévy processes, volume 121 of Cambridge Tracts in Mathematics. Cam- bridge University Press, Cambridge, 1996

    1996

  3. [10]

    H. Brezis. Équations et inéquations non linéaires dans les espaces vectoriels en dualité. Ann. Inst. F ourier (Grenoble), 18(fasc. 1):115–175, 1968

    1968

  4. [11]

    F. E. Browder. Pseudo-monotone operators and nonlinea r elliptic boundary value problems on unbounded domains. Proc. Nat. Acad. Sci. U.S.A. , 74(7):2659–2661, 1977

    1977

  5. [12]

    M. Caputo. Linear Models of Dissipation whose Q is almos t Frequency Independent-II. Geophys. J. R. astr . Soc., 13:529–539, 1967

    1967

  6. [13]

    M. Caputo. Mean fractional-order-derivatives differ ential equations and filters. Ann. Univ. Ferrara Sez. VII Sci. Mat., 41(1):73–84, 1995

    1995

  7. [14]

    M. Caputo. Distributed order differential equations m odelling dielectric induction and diffusion. Fract. Calc. Appl. Anal., 4(4):421–442, 2001. Strong dissipativity of generalized fractional derivativ es and quasi-linear (S)PDE 31

    2001

  8. [15]

    A. V . Chechkin, R. Gorenflo, I. M. Sokolov, and V . Y . Gonch ar. Distributed order time fractional diffusion equation. Fract. Calc. Appl. Anal., 6(3):259–280, 2003

    2003

  9. [16]

    A. V . Chechkin, J. Klafter, and I. M. Sokolov. Fractiona l fokker-planck equation for ultraslow kinetics. EPL (Europhysics Letters), 63(3):326, 2003

    2003

  10. [17]

    L. Chen. Nonlinear stochastic time-fractional diffus ion equations on R: moments, Hölder regularity and intermittency. Trans. Amer . Math. Soc., 369(12):8497–8535, 2017

    2017

  11. [18]

    L. Chen, G. Hu, Y . Hu, and J. Huang. Space-time fractiona l diffusions in Gaussian noisy environment. Stochastics, 89(1):171–206, 2017

    2017

  12. [19]

    Z.-Q. Chen. Time fractional equations and probabilist ic representation. Chaos Solitons Fractals, 102:168–174, 2017

    2017

  13. [20]

    Chen, K.-H

    Z.-Q. Chen, K.-H. Kim, and P . Kim. Fractional time stoch astic partial differential equations. Stochastic Process. Appl., 125(4):1470–1499, 2015

    2015

  14. [21]

    Chen, K.-H

    Z.-Q. Chen, K.-H. Kim, T. Kumagai and J. Wang. Time fract ional Poisson equa- tions: Representations and estimates. J. Funct. Anal., 278(2):108311, 2020

    2020

  15. [22]

    Craiem, F

    D. Craiem, F. J. R. Rojo, J. M. Atienza, R. L. Armentano, a nd G. V . Guinea. Fractional-order viscoelasticity applied to describe uni axial stress relaxation of hu- man arteries. Physics in medicine and biology , 53 17:4543–54, 2008

    2008

  16. [23]

    Desch and S.-O

    G. Desch and S.-O. Londen. Evolutionary equations driv en by fractional Brownian motion, Stoch. Partial Differ . Equ. Anal. Comput., 1(3): 424–454, 2013

    2013

  17. [24]

    Diethelm

    K. Diethelm. The analysis of fractional differential equations: An appl ication- oriented exposition using differential operators of Caput o type , volume 2004 of Lecture Notes in Mathematics . Springer-V erlag, Berlin, 2010

    2004

  18. [25]

    Doi and S

    M. Doi and S. Edwards. The Theory of Polymer Dynamics . Comparative Pathobi- ology - Studies in the Postmodern Theory of Education. Clare ndon Press, 1988

    1988

  19. [26]

    J. Ferry. Viscoelastic Properties of Polymers. Wiley, 1980

    1980

  20. [27]

    Foondun and E

    M. Foondun and E. Nane. Asymptotic properties of some sp ace-time fractional stochastic equations. Math. Z., 287(1-2):493–519, 2017

    2017

  21. [28]

    B. Gess. Random attractors for degenerate stochastic p artial differential equations. J. Dynam. Differential Equations, 25(1):121–157, 2013. 32 Wei Liu, Michael Röckner, José Luís da Silva

    2013

  22. [29]

    Gorenflo and F

    R. Gorenflo and F. Mainardi. Fractional relaxation of di stributed order. In Com- plexus Mundi: Emergent Patterns in Nature, pages 33–42. World Scientific, 2006

    2006

  23. [30]

    Gripenberg, S.-O

    G. Gripenberg, S.-O. Londen, and O. Steffans. V olterra Integral and Functional Equations, volume 34. Cambridge University Press, Cambrige, 1990

    1990

  24. [31]

    Herrmann

    R. Herrmann. Fractional Calculus – An Introduction for Physicists (3rd r evised and extended Edition), World Scientific Publishing, Singapore, 2018

    2018

  25. [32]

    V . G. Jakubowski and P . Wittbold. On a nonlinear ellipti c-parabolic integro- differential equation withL1-data. J. Differential Equations, 197(2):427–445, 2004

    2004

  26. [33]

    Kim, K.-H

    I. Kim, K.-H. Kim, and S. Lim. An Lq(Lp)-theory for the time fractional evolution equations with variable coefficients. Adv. Math., 306:123–176, 2017

    2017

  27. [34]

    Kim, K.-H

    I. Kim, K.-H. Kim, and S. Lim. A Sobolev space theory for s tochastic partial differential equations with time-fractional derivatives . Ann. Probab., 47(4): 2087– 2139, 2019

    2019

  28. [35]

    A. N. Kochubei. Distributed-order calculus: An operat or-theoretic interpretation. Ukrainian Math. J., 60(4):551, 2008

    2008

  29. [36]

    A. N. Kochubei. Distributed order calculus and equatio ns of ultraslow diffusion. J. Math. Anal. Appl. , 340(1):252–281, 2008

    2008

  30. [37]

    A. N. Kochubei. Distributed order derivatives and rela xation patterns. J. Phys. A , 42(3):5203, 2009

    2009

  31. [38]

    A. N. Kochubei. General fractional calculus, evolutio n equations, and renewal pro- cesses. Integral Equations Operator Theory, 71(4):583–600, 2011

    2011

  32. [39]

    Liu and M

    W. Liu and M. Röckner. Local and global well-posedness o f SPDE with generalized coercivity conditions. J. Differential Equations, 254(2):725–755, 2013

    2013

  33. [40]

    Liu and M

    W. Liu and M. Röckner. Stochastic partial differential equations: an introducti on. Universitext. Springer, Cham, 2015

    2015

  34. [42]

    C. F. Lorenzo and T. T. Hartley. V ariable order and distr ibuted order fractional operators. Nonlinear Dynam., 29(1-4):57–98, 2002. Strong dissipativity of generalized fractional derivativ es and quasi-linear (S)PDE 33

    2002

  35. [43]

    Luchko and M

    Y . Luchko and M. Y amamoto. General time-fractional dif fusion equation: some uniqueness and existence results for the initial-boundary -value problems. Fract. Calc. Appl. Anal. , 19(3):676–695, 2016

    2016

  36. [44]

    Z. M. Ma and M. Röckner. Introduction to the theory of (nonsymmetric) Dirichlet forms. Universitext. Springer-V erlag, Berlin, 1992

    1992

  37. [45]

    Mainardi

    F. Mainardi. Fractional calculus and waves in linear viscoelasticity: A n introduc- tion to mathematical models . Imperial College Press, London, 2010

    2010

  38. [46]

    Mainardi, A

    F. Mainardi, A. Mura, R. Gorenflo, and M. Stojanovic. The two forms of fractional relaxation of distributed order. J. Vib. Control, 13(9-10):1249–1268, 2007

    2007

  39. [47]

    Mainardi, A

    F. Mainardi, A. Mura, G. Pagnini, and R. Gorenflo. Time-f ractional diffusion of distributed order. J. Vib. Control, 14(9-10):1267–1290, 2008

    2008

  40. [48]

    M. M. Meerschaert, D. A. Benson, H.-P . Scheffler, and B. B aeumer. Stochastic solution of space-time fractional diffusion equations. Phys. Rev. E, 65(4):041103, 2002

    2002

  41. [49]

    M. M. Meerschaert, E. Nane, and P . V ellaisamy. Fraction al Cauchy problems on bounded domains. Ann. Probab., 37(3):979–1007, 2009

    2009

  42. [50]

    M. M. Meerschaert and H.-P . Scheffler. Limit theorems fo r continuous-time random walks with infinite mean waiting times. J. Appl. Probab., 41(3):623–638, 2004

    2004

  43. [51]

    M. M. Meerschaert and H.-P . Scheffler. Stochastic model for ultraslow diffusion. Stochastic Process. Appl., 116(9):1215–1235, 2006

    2006

  44. [52]

    M. M. Meerschaert and A. Sikorskii. Stochastic models for fractional calculus , volume 43 of De Gruyter Studies in Mathematics . Walter de Gruyter & Co., Berlin, 2012

    2012

  45. [53]

    Metzler, E

    R. Metzler, E. Barkai, and J. Klafter. Anomalous diffus ion and relaxation close to thermal equilibrium: A fractional Fokker-Planck equati on approach. Phys. Rev. Lett., 82:3563–3567, 1999

    1999

  46. [54]

    Metzler and J

    R. Metzler and J. Klafter. The random walk’s guide to ano malous diffusion: a fractional dynamics approach. Phys. Rep., 339(1):77, 2000

    2000

  47. [55]

    J. B. Mijena and E. Nane. Space-time fractional stochas tic partial differential equa- tions. Stochastic Process. Appl., 125(9):3301–3326, 2015. 34 Wei Liu, Michael Röckner, José Luís da Silva

    2015

  48. [56]

    Orsingher and L

    E. Orsingher and L. Beghin. Fractional diffusion equat ions and processes with randomly varying time. Ann. Probab., 37(1):206–249, 2009

    2009

  49. [57]

    Reed and B

    M. Reed and B. Simon. Methods of modern mathematical physics. II. Fourier anal- ysis, self-adjointness . Academic Press [Harcourt Brace Jovanovich, Publishers], New Y ork-London, 1975

    1975

  50. [58]

    J. Ren, M. Röckner, and F.-Y . Wang. Stochastic generali zed porous media and fast diffusion equations. J. Differential Equations, 238(1):118–152, 2007

    2007

  51. [59]

    R. T. Rockafellar. On The maximal monotonicity of subdi fferential mappings. Pa- cific J. Math , 33: 209–216, 1970

    1970

  52. [60]

    B. Ross. The development of fractional calculus 1695–1 900. Historia Math., 4:75– 89, 1977

    1977

  53. [61]

    S. G. Samko and R. P . Cardoso. Integral equations of the fi rst kind of Sonine type. Int. J. Math. Math. Sci. , 2003:3609–3632, 2003

    2003

  54. [62]

    R. L. Schilling, R. Song, and Z. V ondra ˇcek. Bernstein functions: Theory and ap- plications, volume 37 of De Gruyter Studies in Mathematics . Walter de Gruyter & Co., Berlin, second edition, 2012

    2012

  55. [63]

    N. Sonine. Sur la généralisation d’une formule d’Abel. Acta Math. , 4:171–176, 1884

  56. [64]

    W. Stannat. The theory of generalized Dirichlet forms a nd its applications in anal- ysis and stochastics. Mem. Amer . Math. Soc., 142(678): viii+101, 1999

    1999

  57. [65]

    S. D. Taliaferro. Pointwise bounds and blow-up for nonl inear fractional parabolic inequalities. J. Math. Pures Appl. , 133: 287–328, 2020

    2020

  58. [66]

    V ergara and R

    V . V ergara and R. Zacher. Optimal Decay Estimates for Time-Fractional and Other NonLocal Subdiffusion Equations via Energy Methods. SIAM J. Math. Anal., 47(1): 210–239, 2015

    2015

  59. [67]

    R. Zacher. Weak solutions of abstract evolutionary int egro-differential equations in Hilbert spaces. Funkcial. Ekvac., 52(1):1–18, 2009

    2009

  60. [68]

    R. Zacher. Global strong solvability of a quasilinear s ubdiffusion problem. J. Evol. Equ., 12(4):813–831, 2012

    2012

  61. [69]

    E. Zeidler. Nonlinear functional analysis and its applications. II/B . Springer- V erlag, New Y ork, 1990. Nonlinear monotone operators, Translated from the Ger- man by the author and Leo F. Boron

    1990

  62. [1917]

    The Royal Society, 2009

    2009

Pith tools

Reviewed August 14, 2026 · model on record in the stance chip above.