Pith. sign in

REVIEW

Decentralizing Centralized Matching Markets: Implications from Early Offers in University Admissions

Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.

This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.

SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event

T0 review · schema-true

One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.

pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp

arxiv 2107.01532 v2 pith:WNP4L6UJ submitted 2021-07-04 econ.GN econ.THq-fin.EC

classification econ.GNecon.THq-fin.EC
keywords admissionsearlyuniversityassumptioncentralizationmatchingoffersoften
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal
0 comments
read the original abstract

The matching literature often recommends market centralization under the assumption that agents know their own preferences and that their preferences are fixed. We find counterevidence to this assumption in a quasi-experiment. In Germany's university admissions, a clearinghouse implements the early stages of the Gale-Shapley algorithm in real time. We show that early offers made in this decentralized phase, although not more desirable, are accepted more often than later ones. These results, together with survey evidence and a theoretical model, are consistent with students' costly learning about universities. We propose a hybrid mechanism to combine the advantages of decentralization and centralization. Published at The Journal of Political Economy under a new title, ``Preference Discovery in University Admissions: The Case for Dynamic Multioffer Mechanisms,'' available at https://doi.org/10.1086/718983 (Open Access).

Discussion (0). Sign in to comment.

Pith tools