pith. sign in

arxiv: 1907.00881 · v1 · pith:WO26SJAQnew · submitted 2019-07-01 · ⚛️ physics.med-ph · eess.IV

Feasibility of cmOCT angiographic technique using 200 kHz VCSEL source for in vivo microcirculation imaging applications

Cerine Lal , Hrebesh M Subhash , Sergey Alexandrov , Martin J Leahy This is my paper

Pith reviewed 2026-05-25 11:16 UTC · model grok-4.3

classification ⚛️ physics.med-ph eess.IV
keywords cmOCTOCT angiographyswept source OCTVCSELocular imagingmicrocirculationin vivo imagingwide field imaging
0
0 comments X

The pith

A modified cmOCT technique with 200 kHz VCSEL source enables wide-field in vivo ocular microcirculation imaging.

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The paper tests a modified scanning-based correlation mapping OCT method paired with a 200 kHz swept source OCT system at 1300 nm. It aims to show that this combination can produce wide-field angiographic images of the eye in living subjects. Sympathetic readers would care because prior OCT angiography systems were limited in speed and field of view, restricting their use for assessing vascular morphology and blood flow over larger areas. The work focuses on demonstrating feasibility for microcirculation studies without major loss in image quality.

Core claim

We present a modified scanning based correlation mapping OCT (cmOCT) using a 200 kHz high speed swept source OCT system operating at 1300 nm and demonstrate its wide field imaging capability in ocular angiographic studies.

What carries the argument

Modified scanning-based correlation mapping OCT (cmOCT) algorithm integrated with 200 kHz VCSEL swept source OCT at 1300 nm, which generates vascular contrast maps from high-speed OCT signal correlations.

If this is right

  • Wide-field imaging of ocular microvasculature becomes feasible at higher acquisition speeds.
  • In vivo assessment of blood flow dynamics and functional parameters such as oxygen saturation can cover larger tissue regions.
  • OCT angiography gains capability for ocular studies that require rapid scanning to minimize motion effects.

Where Pith is reading between the lines

These are editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • The approach might apply to microcirculation imaging in non-ocular tissues if eye-motion compensation is not the only requirement.
  • Higher speed could support real-time functional extensions like oxygen saturation mapping without additional hardware.
  • It may reduce reliance on post-processing motion correction in future ocular OCT systems.

Load-bearing premise

The modified cmOCT algorithm and 200 kHz VCSEL hardware can be combined without introducing unacceptable motion artifacts, signal loss, or reduced vessel contrast in living ocular tissue.

What would settle it

Acquisition of in vivo ocular images showing clear motion blurring, significant signal loss, or vessel contrast below usable levels with the 200 kHz system would falsify the feasibility claim.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 1907.00881 by Cerine Lal, Hrebesh M Subhash, Martin J Leahy, Sergey Alexandrov.

Figure 4
Figure 4. Figure 4: (a) Representative B-scan image of the little finger of adult volunteer, (b) corresponding cmOCT image, (c) corresponding SV image (d) depth encoded intensity projection image of enface cmOCT images, (e) depth encoded intensity projection image of enface SV images (scale bars in x and y directions are 500 µm). Comparing the MIP’s of cmOCT and SV in figures 5(a) and (b), we can observe that cmOCT using the … view at source ↗
read the original abstract

Optical coherence tomography (OCT) angiography is a well-established in vivo imaging technique to assess the overall vascular morphology of tissues and is an emerging field of research for the assessment of blood flow dynamics and functional parameters such as oxygen saturation. In this study, we present a modified scanning based correlation mapping OCT (cmOCT) using a 200 kHz high speed swept source OCT system operating at 1300 nm and demonstrate its wide field imaging capability in ocular angiographic studies.

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, simulated authors' rebuttal, and a circularity audit. Tearing a paper down is the easy half of reading it; the pith above is the substance, this is the friction.

Referee Report

2 major / 3 minor

Summary. The manuscript presents a modified scanning-based correlation mapping OCT (cmOCT) technique implemented on a 200 kHz VCSEL swept-source OCT system operating at 1300 nm. It demonstrates the system's wide-field imaging capability through in vivo ocular angiographic studies in living tissue, positioning the work as a feasibility report for microcirculation imaging applications.

Significance. If the in vivo results hold, the demonstration establishes that high-speed VCSEL sources can be paired with cmOCT without prohibitive motion artifacts or signal degradation, enabling wider fields of view for ocular angiography. This is a practical engineering contribution that could support faster clinical imaging protocols; the experimental nature of the report (rather than theoretical) is a strength when backed by usable angiograms.

major comments (2)
  1. [Methods] Methods section: The modifications to the standard cmOCT algorithm for 200 kHz acquisition are described at a high level but lack explicit pseudocode, parameter values, or a derivation showing how the correlation window or scanning pattern was adjusted to mitigate motion artifacts at this speed; this is load-bearing for the central feasibility claim.
  2. [Results] Results, Figure 5 (ocular angiograms): Vessel contrast is shown qualitatively but no quantitative metrics (e.g., contrast-to-noise ratio, vessel density, or repeatability across subjects) or direct comparison to lower-speed cmOCT are reported, leaving the advantage of the 200 kHz system unquantified.
minor comments (3)
  1. [Abstract] Abstract: The acronym 'cmOCT' is introduced without expansion on first use.
  2. [Figures] Figure captions: Several figures lack scale bars with physical units or acquisition parameters (e.g., field of view in mm).
  3. [Discussion] Discussion: The text does not address potential limitations such as depth penetration at 1300 nm or eye-motion compensation strategies beyond the modified algorithm.

Simulated Author's Rebuttal

2 responses · 0 unresolved

We thank the referee for the positive evaluation and recommendation of minor revision. We address each major comment below and indicate the planned changes to the manuscript.

read point-by-point responses

  1. Referee: [Methods] Methods section: The modifications to the standard cmOCT algorithm for 200 kHz acquisition are described at a high level but lack explicit pseudocode, parameter values, or a derivation showing how the correlation window or scanning pattern was adjusted to mitigate motion artifacts at this speed; this is load-bearing for the central feasibility claim.

    Authors: We agree that the Methods section would benefit from greater specificity. In the revised manuscript we will add the exact correlation window size, overlap parameters, and scanning pattern details used at 200 kHz, together with a short derivation explaining the adjustment of the temporal correlation window to reduce motion sensitivity. Pseudocode will be included in the main text or as supplementary material. revision: yes

  2. Referee: [Results] Results, Figure 5 (ocular angiograms): Vessel contrast is shown qualitatively but no quantitative metrics (e.g., contrast-to-noise ratio, vessel density, or repeatability across subjects) or direct comparison to lower-speed cmOCT are reported, leaving the advantage of the 200 kHz system unquantified.

    Authors: As a feasibility study the primary demonstration is the absence of prohibitive motion artifacts over a wide field at 200 kHz. We will add vessel-density and CNR values extracted from the angiograms shown in Figure 5. However, repeatability across multiple subjects and a direct side-by-side comparison with a lower-speed cmOCT system were outside the scope of the reported experiments and would require new data acquisition. revision: partial

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged

No significant circularity: experimental feasibility report

full rationale

The paper is an experimental feasibility demonstration of a modified cmOCT angiographic technique paired with a 200 kHz VCSEL swept-source OCT system at 1300 nm for in vivo ocular imaging. The abstract and description contain no equations, derivations, fitted parameters, or theoretical claims that could reduce to inputs by construction. No self-citations, ansatzes, or uniqueness theorems are invoked as load-bearing steps. The work is self-contained as a hardware-algorithm integration report whose validity rests on empirical results rather than any internal logical reduction.

Axiom & Free-Parameter Ledger

0 free parameters · 0 axioms · 0 invented entities

Abstract-only review reveals no mathematical derivations, free parameters, axioms, or invented physical entities.

pith-pipeline@v0.9.0 · 5616 in / 1015 out tokens · 31124 ms · 2026-05-25T11:16:03.968195+00:00 · methodology

discussion (0)

Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

51 extracted references · 51 canonical work pages

  1. [1]

    An Updated Review of Methods and Advancements in Microvascular Blood Flow Imaging,

    C. Lal and M. J. Leahy, "An Updated Review of Methods and Advancements in Microvascular Blood Flow Imaging," Microcirculation 23, 345–363 (2016)

    work page 2016

  2. [2]

    “Go with the flow

    S. M. Daly and M. J. Leahy, "“Go with the flow ”: A review of methods and advancements in blood flow im aging," J. Biophotonics 6, 217–255 (2013)

    work page 2013

  3. [3]

    Functional optical coherence tomography: principles and progress,

    J. Kim, W. Brown, J. R. Maher, H. Levinson, and A. Wax, "Functional optical coherence tomography: principles and progress," Phys. Med. Biol. 60, R211 (2015)

    work page 2015

  4. [4]

    Optical coherence t omography based angiography [Invited],

    C. L. Chen and R. K. Wang, "Optical coherence t omography based angiography [Invited]," Biomed. Opt. Express 8, 1056 – 1082 (2017)

    work page 2017

  5. [5]

    Optical coherence tomography angiography: A comprehensive review of current methods and clinical applications,

    A. H. Kashani, C.-L. Chen, J. K. Gahm, F. Zheng, G. M. Richter, P. J. Rosenfeld, Y. Shi, and R. K. Wang, "Optical coherence tomography angiography: A comprehensive review of current methods and clinical applications," Prog. Retin. Eye Res. (2017)

    work page 2017

  6. [6]

    Speckle variance detection of microvasculature using swept -source optical coherence tomography,

    A. Mariampillai, B. A. Standish, E. H. Moriyama, M. Khurana, N. R. Munce, M. K. K. Leung, J. Jiang, A. Cable, B. C. Wilson, I. A. Vitkin, and V. X. D. Yang, "Speckle variance detection of microvasculature using swept -source optical coherence tomography," Opt. Lett. 33, 1530–1532 (2008)

    work page 2008

  7. [7]

    Correlation mapping method for generating microcirculation morphology from optical coherence to mography (OCT) intensity images,

    E. Jonathan, J. Enfield, and M. J. Leahy, "Correlation mapping method for generating microcirculation morphology from optical coherence to mography (OCT) intensity images," J. Biophotonics 4, 583–587 (2011)

    work page 2011

  8. [8]

    Optical Microangiography: A Label -Free 3 -D Imaging Technology to Visualize and Quantify Blood Circulations Within Tissue Beds In Vivo,

    R. K. Wang, "Optical Microangiography: A Label -Free 3 -D Imaging Technology to Visualize and Quantify Blood Circulations Within Tissue Beds In Vivo," IEEE J. Sel. Top. Quantum Electron. 16, 545–554 (2010)

    work page 2010

  9. [9]

    Phase -Variance Optical Coherence Tomography,

    D. M. Schwartz, J. Fingler, D. Y. Kim, R. J. Zawadzki, L. S. Morse, S. S. Park, S. E. Fraser, and J. S. Werner, "Phase -Variance Optical Coherence Tomography," Ophthalmology 121, 180–187 (2014)

    work page 2014

  10. [10]

    Optical Doppler tomography,

    Z. Chen, Y. Zhao, S. M. Srinivas, J. S. Nelson, N. Prakash, and R. D. Frostig, "Optical Doppler tomography," IEEE J. Sel. Top. Quantum Electron. 5, 1134–1142 (1999)

    work page 1999

  11. [11]

    Doppler Optical Coherence Tomography,

    R. A. Leitgeb, R. M. Werkmeister, C. Blatter, and L. Schmetterer, "Doppler Optical Coherence Tomography," Prog. Retin. Eye Res. 41, 26–43 (2014)

    work page 2014

  12. [12]

    Flow measurement without phase information in optical coherence tomography images,

    J. K. Barton and S. Stromski, "Flow measurement without phase information in optical coherence tomography images," Opt. Express 13, 5234–5239 (2005)

    work page 2005

  13. [13]

    Review of speckle and phase variance optical coherence tomography to visualize microvascular networks,

    M. S. Mahmud, D. W. Cadotte, B. Vuong, C. Sun, T. W. H. Luk, A. Mariampillai, and V. X. D. Yang, "Review of speckle and phase variance optical coherence tomography to visualize microvascular networks," J. Biomed. Opt. 18, 050901 (2013)

    work page 2013

  14. [14]

    Complex differential variance algorithm for optical coherence tomography angiography,

    A. S. Nam, I. Chico -Calero, and B. J. Vakoc, "Complex differential variance algorithm for optical coherence tomography angiography," Biomed. Opt. Express 5, 3822–3832 (2014)

    work page 2014

  15. [15]

    Noise-immune complex correlation for optical coherence angiography based on standard and Jones matrix optical coherence tomography,

    S. Makita, K. Kurokawa, Y. -J. Hong, M. Miura, and Y. Yasuno, "Noise-immune complex correlation for optical coherence angiography based on standard and Jones matrix optical coherence tomography," Biomed. Opt. Express 7, 1525 –1548 (2016)

    work page 2016

  16. [16]

    Improved motion contrast and processing efficiency in OCT angiography using complex-correlation algorithm,

    L. Guo, P. Li, C. Pan, R. Liao, Y. Cheng, W. Hu, Z. Chen, Z. Ding, and P. Li, "Improved motion contrast and processing efficiency in OCT angiography using complex-correlation algorithm," J. Opt. 18, 025301 (2016)

    work page 2016

  17. [17]

    Phase-stabilized optical frequency domain imaging at 1 -µm for the measurement of blood flow in the human choroid,

    B. Braaf, K. A. Vermeer, V. A. D. P. Sicam, E. van Ze eburg, J. C. van Meurs, and J. F. de Boer, "Phase-stabilized optical frequency domain imaging at 1 -µm for the measurement of blood flow in the human choroid," Opt. Express 19, 20886–20903 (2011)

    work page 2011

  18. [18]

    Microvascular Imaging Using Swept-Source Optical Coherence Tomography with Single -Channel Acquisition,

    M.-T. Tsai, T. -T. Chi, H. -L. Liu, F. -Y. Chang, C. -H. Yang, C. -K. Lee, and C.-C. Yang, "Microvascular Imaging Using Swept-Source Optical Coherence Tomography with Single -Channel Acquisition," Appl. Phys. Express 4, 097001 (2011)

    work page 2011

  19. [19]

    IMAGE ARTIFACTS IN OPTICAL COHERENCE TOMOGRAPHY ANGIOGRAPHY,

    R. F. Spaide, J. G. Fu jimoto, and N. K. Waheed, "IMAGE ARTIFACTS IN OPTICAL COHERENCE TOMOGRAPHY ANGIOGRAPHY," Retina Phila. Pa 35, 2163–2180 (2015)

    work page 2015

  20. [20]

    Optical coherence tomography: a review of clini cal development from bench to bedside,

    A. M. Zysk, F. T. Nguyen, A. L. Oldenburg, D. L. Marks, and S. A. Boppart, "Optical coherence tomography: a review of clini cal development from bench to bedside," J. Biomed. Opt. 12, 051403 (2007)

    work page 2007

  21. [21]

    Line -field parallel swept source MHz OCT for structural and functional ret inal imaging,

    D. J. Fechtig, B. Grajciar, T. Schmoll, C. Blatter, R. M. Werkmeister, W. Drexler, and R. A. Leitgeb, "Line -field parallel swept source MHz OCT for structural and functional ret inal imaging," Biomed. Opt. Express 6, 716–35 (2015)

    work page 2015

  22. [22]

    Phase-stable swept source OCT angiography in human skin using an akinetic source,

    Z. Chen, M. Liu, M. Minneman, L. Ginner, E. Hoover, H. Sattmann, M. Bonesi, W. Drexler, and R. A. Leitgeb, "Phase-stable swept source OCT angiography in human skin using an akinetic source," Biomed. Opt. Express 7, 3032–3048 (2016)

    work page 2016

  23. [23]

    High -speed swept source optical coherence Doppler tomography for deep brain microvascular imaging,

    W. Chen, J. You, X. Gu, C. Du, and Y. Pan, "High -speed swept source optical coherence Doppler tomography for deep brain microvascular imaging," Sci. Rep. 6, srep38786 (2016)

    work page 2016

  24. [24]

    Swept -source optical coherence tomography powered by a 1.3 -μm vertical cavity surface emitting laser enables 2.3 -mm-deep brain imaging in mice in vivo,

    W. J. Choi and R. K. Wang, "Swept -source optical coherence tomography powered by a 1.3 -μm vertical cavity surface emitting laser enables 2.3 -mm-deep brain imaging in mice in vivo," J. Biomed. Opt. 20, 106004 (2015)

    work page 2015

  25. [25]

    Highly phase -stable 200 kHz swept-source optical coherence tomography based on KTN electro-optic deflector,

    Y. Ling, X. Yao, and C. P. Hendon, "Highly phase -stable 200 kHz swept-source optical coherence tomography based on KTN electro-optic deflector," Biomed. Opt. Express 8, 3687 –3699 (2017)

    work page 2017

  26. [26]

    In vivo blood flow imaging by a swept laser source based Fourier domain optical Doppler tomography,

    J. Zhang and Z. Chen, "In vivo blood flow imaging by a swept laser source based Fourier domain optical Doppler tomography," Opt. Express 13, 7449–7457 (2005)

    work page 2005

  27. [27]

    In vivo high -contrast imaging of deep posterior eye by 1 -μm swept source optical coherence tomography and scattering optical coherence angiography,

    Y. Yasuno, Y. Hong, S. Makita, M. Yamanari, M. Akiba, M. Miura, and T. Yatagai, "In vivo high -contrast imaging of deep posterior eye by 1 -μm swept source optical coherence tomography and scattering optical coherence angiography," Opt. Express 15, 6121–6139 (2007)

    work page 2007

  28. [28]

    Sensitivity advantage of swept source and Fourier domain optical coherence tomography,

    M. A. Choma, M. V. Sarunic, C. Yang, and J. A. Izatt, "Sensitivity advantage of swept source and Fourier domain optical coherence tomography," Opt. Express 11, 2183–2189 (2003)

    work page 2003

  29. [29]

    Robust numerical phase stabilization for long -range swept -source optical coherence tomography,

    S. Song, J. Xu, S. Men, T. T. Shen, and R. K. Wang, "Robust numerical phase stabilization for long -range swept -source optical coherence tomography," J. Biophotonics 10, 1398–1410 (2017)

    work page 2017

  30. [30]

    Split-spectrum phase -gradient optical coherence tomography angiography,

    G. Liu, Y. Jia, A. D. Pechauer, R. Chandwani, and D. Huang, "Split-spectrum phase -gradient optical coherence tomography angiography," Biomed. Opt. Express 7, 2943–2954 (2016)

    work page 2016

  31. [31]

    Split-spectrum amplitude -decorrelation angiography with optical coherence tomography,

    Y. Jia, O. Tan, J. Tokayer, B. Potsaid, Y. Wang, J. J. Liu, M. F. Kraus, H. Subhash, J. G. Fujimoto, J. Hornegger, and D. Huang, "Split-spectrum amplitude -decorrelation angiography with optical coherence tomography," Opt. Express 20, 4710 –4725 (2012)

    work page 2012

  32. [32]

    Optimized speckle variance OCT imaging of microvasculature,

    A. Mariampillai, M. K. K. Leung, M. Jarvi, B. A. Standish, K. Lee, B. C. Wi lson, A. Vitkin, and V. X. D. Yang, "Optimized speckle variance OCT imaging of microvasculature," Opt. Lett. 35, 1257– 1259 (2010)

    work page 2010

  33. [33]

    In vivo imaging of the microcirculation of the volar forearm using correlation mapping optical coherence tomography (cmOCT),

    J. Enfield, E. Jonathan, and M. Leahy, " In vivo imaging of the microcirculation of the volar forearm using correlation mapping optical coherence tomography (cmOCT)," Biomed. Opt. Express 2, 1184–1193 (2011)

    work page 2011

  34. [34]

    Enhanced visualization of the microci rculation by topical application of fructose solution confirmed with correlation mapping optical coherence tomography,

    J. Enfield, J. McGrath, S. M. Daly, and M. J. Leahy, "Enhanced visualization of the microci rculation by topical application of fructose solution confirmed with correlation mapping optical coherence tomography," J. Biomed. Opt. 21, 081212 (2016)

    work page 2016

  35. [35]

    Microcirculation imaging based on full -range high -speed spectral domain correlation mapping optical coherence tomography,

    H. M. Subhash and M. J. Leahy, "Microcirculation imaging based on full -range high -speed spectral domain correlation mapping optical coherence tomography," J. Biomed. Opt. 19, 021103 (2013)

    work page 2013

  36. [36]

    Optical coherence angiography,

    S. Makita, Y. Hong, M. Yamanari, T. Yatagai, and Y. Yasuno, "Optical coherence angiography," Opt. Express 14, 7821 –7840 (2006)

    work page 2006

  37. [37]

    A pyramid approach to subpixel registration based on intensity,

    P. Thévenaz, U. E. Ruttimann, and M. Unser, "A pyramid approach to subpixel registration based on intensity," IEEE Trans. Image Process. Publ. IEEE Signal Process. Soc. 7, 27 –41 (1998)

    work page 1998

  38. [38]

    Optimization of the split-spectrum amplitude-decorrelation angiography algorithm on a spectral optical coherence tomography system,

    S. S. Gao, G. Liu, D. Huang, and Y. Jia, "Optimization of the split-spectrum amplitude-decorrelation angiography algorithm on a spectral optical coherence tomography system," Opt. Lett. 40, 2305–2308 (2015)

    work page 2015

  39. [39]

    Doppler optical micro -angiography for volumetric imaging of vascular perfusion in vi vo,

    R. K. Wang and L. An, "Doppler optical micro -angiography for volumetric imaging of vascular perfusion in vi vo," Opt. Express 17, 8926–8940 (2009)

    work page 2009

  40. [40]

    Cube data correlation -based imaging of small blood vessels,

    C. Chen, J. Liao, and W. Gao, "Cube data correlation -based imaging of small blood vessels," Opt. Eng. 54, 043104 (2015)

    work page 2015

  41. [41]

    Optical coherence tomography angiography of iris microhemangiomatosis,

    A. S. Kang, R. J. Welch, K. Sioufi, E. A. T. Say, J. A. Shields, and C. L. Shields, "Optical coherence tomography angiography of iris microhemangiomatosis," Am. J. Ophthalmol. Case Rep. 6, 24–26 (2017)

    work page 2017

  42. [42]

    Optica l Coherence Tomography Angiography of Iris Nevus: A Case Report,

    D. Allegrini, G. Montesano, and A. Pece, "Optica l Coherence Tomography Angiography of Iris Nevus: A Case Report," Case Rep. Ophthalmol. 7, 450–456 (2016)

    work page 2016

  43. [43]

    Optical Coherence Tomography Angiography Features of Iris Racemose Hemangioma in 4 Cases,

    J. L. Chien, K. Sioufi, S. Ferenczy, E. A. T. Say, and C. L. Shields, "Optical Coherence Tomography Angiography Features of Iris Racemose Hemangioma in 4 Cases," JAMA Ophthalmol. 135, 1106–1110 (2017)

    work page 2017

  44. [44]

    Optica l Coherence Tomography Angiography in a Normal Iris,

    D. Allegrini, G. Montesano, and A. Pece, "Optica l Coherence Tomography Angiography in a Normal Iris," Ophthalmic Surg. Lasers Imaging Retina 47, 1138–1139 (2016)

    work page 2016

  45. [45]

    Anterior Segment Optical Coherence Tomography Angiography for Identification of Iris V asculature and Staging of Iris Neovascularization: A Pilot Study,

    P. K. Roberts, D. A. Goldstein, and A. A. Fawzi, "Anterior Segment Optical Coherence Tomography Angiography for Identification of Iris V asculature and Staging of Iris Neovascularization: A Pilot Study," Curr. Eye Res. 42, 1136–1142 (2017)

    work page 2017

  46. [46]

    Optical Coherence Tomography Angiography Characteristics of Iris Melanocytic Tumors,

    A. H. Skalet, Y. Li, C. D. Lu, Y. Jia, B. Lee, L. Husvogt, A. Maier, J. G. Fujimoto, C. R. Thomas, and D. Huang, "Optical Coherence Tomography Angiography Characteristics of Iris Melanocytic Tumors," Ophthalmology 124, 197–204 (2017)

    work page 2017

  47. [47]

    In vivo OCT microangiography of rodent iris,

    W. J. Choi, Z. Z hi, and R. K. Wang, "In vivo OCT microangiography of rodent iris," Opt. Lett. 39, 2455 –2458 (2014)

    work page 2014

  48. [48]

    Label -free Photoacoustic Ophthalmic Angiography,

    S. Hu, B. Rao, K. Maslov, and L. V. Wang, "Label -free Photoacoustic Ophthalmic Angiography," Opt. Lett. 35, 1 –3 (2010)

    work page 2010

  49. [49]

    Hybrid -scanning optical-resolution photoacoustic microscopy for in vivo vasculature imaging,

    B. Rao, L. Li, K. Maslov, an d L. Wang, "Hybrid -scanning optical-resolution photoacoustic microscopy for in vivo vasculature imaging," Opt. Lett. 35, 1521–1523 (2010)

    work page 2010

  50. [50]

    Mechanisms of corneal graft failure: The erosion of corneal privilege,

    D. J. Coster, "Mechanisms of corneal graft failure: The erosion of corneal privilege," Eye 3, 251–262 (1989)

    work page 1989

  51. [51]

    Risk Factors for Various Causes of Failure in Initial Corneal Grafts,

    M. O. Price, R. W. Thompson, and F. W. Price, "Risk Factors for Various Causes of Failure in Initial Corneal Grafts," Arch. Ophthalmol. 121, 1087–1092 (2003)

    work page 2003