REVIEW 2 cited by
Understanding Decentralized Social Feed Curation on Mastodon
Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.
This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.
SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event
T0 review · schema-true
One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.
pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp
read the original abstract
As centralized social media platforms face growing concerns, more users are seeking greater control over their social feeds and turning to decentralized alternatives such as Mastodon. The decentralized nature of Mastodon creates unique opportunities for customizing feeds, yet user perceptions and curation strategies on these platforms remain unknown. This paper presents findings from a two-part interview study with 21 Mastodon users, exploring how they perceive, interact with, and manage their current feeds, and how we can better empower users to personalize their feeds on Mastodon. We use the qualitative findings of the first part of the study to guide the creation of Braids, a web-based prototype for feed curation. Results from the second part of our study, using Braids, highlighted opportunities and challenges for future research, particularly in using seamful design to enhance people's acceptance of algorithmic curation and nuanced trade-offs between machine learning-based and rule-based curation algorithms. To optimize user experience, we also discuss the tension between creating new apps and building add-ons in the decentralized social media realm.
Forward citations
Cited by 2 Pith papers
-
Seeing the Politics of Decentralized Social Media Protocols
A ten-component framework shows how four decentralized social media protocols allocate power over identity, curation, and infrastructure in different ways.
-
Understanding Community-Level Blocklists in Decentralized Social Media
Across 1,807 Mastodon instances and 12 moderator interviews, community-level blocklists vary widely in purpose and transparency, and moderators balance openness, safety, and context when using them.
Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.