REVIEW 1 cited by
Bias on Tensor-to-Scalar Ratio Inference With Estimated Covariance Matrices
Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.
This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.
SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event
T0 review · schema-true
One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.
pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp
abstract
We investigate simulation-based bandpower covariance matrices commonly used in cosmological parameter inferences such as the estimation of the tensor-to-scalar ratio $r$. We find that upper limits on $r$ can be biased low by tens of percent. The underestimation of the upper limit is most severe when the number of simulation realizations is similar to the number of observables. Convergence of the covariance-matrix estimation can require a number of simulations an order of magnitude larger than the number of observables, which could mean $\mathcal{O}(10\ 000)$ simulations. This is found to be caused by an additional scatter in the posterior probability of $r$ due to Monte Carlo noise in the estimated bandpower covariance matrix, in particular, by spurious non-zero off-diagonal elements. We show that matrix conditioning can be a viable mitigation strategy in the case that legitimate covariance assumptions can be made.
Forward citations
Cited by 1 Pith paper
-
CMB-S4: Foreground-Cleaning Pipeline Comparison for Measuring Primordial Gravitational Waves
For simulated CMB-S4 South Pole observations, three foreground-cleaning pipelines give comparable r constraints on simple foregrounds, but extended residual marginalization is needed to remove complex-foreground biase...
Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.