pith. sign in

Integrity report for Traditional statistical representations outperform generative AI in identifying expert peer reviewers

A machine-verified record of the checks Pith has run against this paper: detector runs, findings, signed bundle events, and canonical identifiers.

arXiv:2605.18752 · pith:2026:WRFJYUNBLARGM4UG5QX2LG4VHQ

0Critical
0Advisory
5Detectors run
2026-05-20Last checked

Paper page arXiv integrity.json bundle.json

Detector runs

cited_work_retraction completed v1.0.0 · findings 0 · 2026-05-20 21:23:18.978324+00:00
doi_title_agreement completed v1.0.0 · findings 0 · 2026-05-20 08:01:22.657625+00:00
doi_compliance completed v1.0.0 · findings 0 · 2026-05-20 07:52:34.496903+00:00
ai_meta_artifact skipped v1.0.0 · findings 0 · 2026-05-20 00:33:31.760687+00:00
claim_evidence completed v1.0.0 · findings 0 · 2026-05-20 00:01:58.970925+00:00

Findings

No public integrity findings for this paper.

Signed record

The machine-readable record for this paper lives at /pith/WRFJYUNB/integrity.json. Pith Number bundles also include signed pith.integrity.v1 events where a Pith Number exists.