Error and Inference: an outsider stand on a frequentist philosophy
classification
📊 stat.ME
keywords
errorfrequentistinferencealternativesapproacharisbayesianbook
read the original abstract
This note is an extended review of the book Error and Inference, edited by Deborah Mayo and Aris Spanos, about their frequentist and philosophical perspective on testing of hypothesis and on the criticisms of alternatives like the Bayesian approach.
This paper has not been read by Pith yet.
discussion (0)
Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.