Pith. sign in

REVIEW 3 major objections 5 minor 1 cited by

Spectral signatures of young radio galaxies

T0 review · 3 major / 5 minor · reviewed 2026-08-11 · deepseek-v4-flash

Challenge this review Re-run · record.json Download PDF Read on arXiv ↗ Review JSON

Pith's one-line read The paper argues that the turnover frequency of a young radio galaxy's integrated spectrum is fixed by host ISM density and independent of jet power, offering a new way to weigh the gas around these sources.

desk verdict Careful simulation study with useful morphology predictions, but the headline 'new probe of the ISM' claim is not yet calibrated because the paper itself concedes the turnover depends on cloud scales, not just density. read the letter →

arxiv 2412.14433 v2 pith:WSBECBLP submitted 2024-12-19 astro-ph.GA

Sophie A. Young , Ross J. Turner , Stanislav S. Shabala , Georgia S. C. Stewart , Patrick M. Yates-Jones This is my paper · ORCID
classification astro-ph.GA
keywords galaxies:jetsradiocontinuum:galaxiesISM:andoutflowsactivehydrodynamicsfree-freeabsorptionpeaked-spectrumsourcesspectralturnover
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal

The pith

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The reading

The paper uses three-dimensional hydrodynamic simulations of jets launched from an active galactic nucleus to argue that the radio spectrum of a young radio source carries a direct, measurable imprint of the gas it is plowing through. The central claim is that the frequency at which the integrated radio spectrum peaks is set by the density of the host galaxy's multiphase interstellar medium and does not depend on the power of the jet. If this holds, an observer needs only the turnover frequency and the linear size of a resolved young source to estimate the surrounding gas density, with no knowledge of jet power required. The simulations also show that a single continuous young jet can produce double-double morphology and high core prominence, so these commonly used restarted-source signatures do not by themselves prove multiple epochs of activity.

What carries the argument

The carrier of the argument is the combination of a three-dimensional hydrodynamic jet simulation with a synthetic radio pipeline: Lagrangian tracer particles track electron packets whose adiabatic and radiative losses set the synchrotron emissivity, and a free-free absorption optical depth is integrated along every line of sight through the simulated gas. The load-bearing identity is the free-free absorption coefficient $\alpha_\nu \propto n_e n_i \nu^{-2}$, which depends only on the absorbing gas and the observing frequency, so the spectral turnover carries no memory of jet power. The multiphase environment is built from a lognormal distribution of dense clouds in pressure equilibrium with hot diffuse gas inside a double-isothermal galaxy potential, matched to a $\beta$-profile for the surrounding cluster or group.

What would settle it

Compare two observed resolved peaked-spectrum sources matched in linear size and host ISM density but with jet powers differing by an order of magnitude: the paper predicts identical rest-frame turnover frequencies, so a systematic difference in $\nu_p$ would falsify the central claim.

Watch

Extended reading notes

Core claim

On the paper's own terms, the discovery is that free-free absorption of synchrotron emission by the clumpy multiphase ISM sets the turnover in the radio spectrum of young radio galaxies, and because the absorption coefficient depends on gas density, temperature and frequency but not on any jet property, the turnover frequency at a fixed source size tracks ISM density alone. The simulations reproduce the observed inverse correlation between peak frequency and source size and show that halving the central cloud density shifts the turnover to lower frequencies, while changing jet power by an order of magnitude leaves it unchanged. A second discovery is that the same dense clouds that produce the free-free screen also slow the jet and counterjet unevenly, creating lobe length and brightness asymmetries that persist to tens of kiloparsecs in poor-group environments but wash out in cluster environments.

Load-bearing premise

The simulations treat the jet as a slow, dense flow moving at a tenth of light speed and leave out radiative cooling; if real jets or cooling change how the dense clouds are shredded, the claimed density-only, jet-power-independent turnover could fail.

Editorial extensions

If this is right

  • A measured rest-frame turnover frequency and linear size for a resolved young source yield an estimate of the central ISM density without any assumption about jet power.
  • Young, continuously active sources can display double-double morphology and core prominence above 0.1, so restarted-source classifications based on these signs alone will include some false positives.
  • Lengthening asymmetries that persist to tens of kiloparsecs point to a poor-group environment rather than to a restart episode, because flat cluster profiles let the shorter jet catch up.
  • The simulations reproduce the observed $\nu_p \propto L_S^{-0.65}$ trend qualitatively, with lower ISM densities (150 cm$^{-3}$) giving better agreement with observed sources than 400 cm$^{-3}$.
  • High-resolution and surface-brightness-sensitive observations are needed to avoid misclassifying young sources; at high redshift the connecting bridge can drop below detectability, splitting a single source into unrelated components.

Reading between the lines

Editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • If the calibration holds, turnover frequency could serve as an ISM weighing tool for high-redshift peaked-spectrum samples where direct molecular gas tracers are impractical.
  • The jet-power independence is unlikely to survive unchanged if relativistic spines or radiative cooling change how jets destroy clouds; rerunning the pipeline with a relativistic jet treatment would test whether the density-only relation persists.
  • The demonstration that young continuous sources mimic restarted morphology implies that inferred restarted-source fractions in flux-limited samples may be overestimated, and additional spectral curvature metrics may separate the two populations.
  • The free-free turnover in these runs only persists while the source is inside the 2.5 kpc cloud region, so extending the absorbing cloud distribution or inclining the jet could push free-free turnovers to the larger sizes where observed peaked-spectrum sources live.
Share X Bluesky LinkedIn Reddit HN

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, and a circularity audit.

Referee Report

3 major / 5 minor

Summary. The paper presents hydrodynamic simulations of AGN jets propagating through a clumpy, multiphase ISM and into a surrounding cluster or group atmosphere, with synthetic radio observations constructed by combining synchrotron emission from Lagrangian tracer particles with free-free absorption along the line of sight. The authors study how jet–cloud interactions create persistent length and brightness asymmetries, how such asymmetries and the apparent core prominence can lead to misclassification of young sources as restarted or head-tail sources, and how the spectral turnover frequency depends on source size, ISM density, and jet power. They report that the peak frequency is lower for lower ISM density and independent of jet power, and propose that spectral turnover in resolved young sources provides a new probe of the ISM.

Significance. If the central claims hold, the paper would provide a novel observational route to estimating the gas density around young radio sources without needing to know the jet power, and would sharpen the interpretation of double-double morphologies and core prominence as restarted-source indicators. The forward-modeling pipeline is a genuine strength: the simulations self-consistently combine hydrodynamics, synchrotron emissivity with adiabatic and radiative losses, and free-free absorption, and the synthetic observations at different resolutions and redshifts give concrete, falsifiable predictions for survey classification. The qualitative reproduction of the observed inverse peak-frequency–size correlation and the demonstration that jet-power dependence does not appear in the tested cases are useful results. However, the interpretation of turnover as a calibrated ISM probe is not yet supported, because the paper itself concedes that the relation depends on the spatial distribution of the absorbing clouds.

major comments (3)
  1. [Section 6.1, abstract, Section 7(vi)] The central claim that spectral turnover provides a new probe of the ISM is not supported as stated. Section 6.1 explicitly concedes that the νp–LS relation 'is likely to also depend on the scales over which the clouds are distributed', and that the maximum cloud extent in the simulations is 2.5 kpc, limiting FFA turnover to source sizes of a few kpc. Because the free-free optical depth in Eq. (9) is a path integral over absorbing gas along each line of sight, at fixed mean density and source size different cloud covering factors, clumpiness scales, or radial extents will change τν and hence νp. Thus an observed (νp, LS) pair cannot be inverted to a unique ISM density without independent knowledge of the cloud geometry. This limitation is load-bearing for the abstract and conclusion (vi), so the claim should either be removed or substantially weakened to state that turnover depends on ISM density and geometry, and that the present simulations demonstrate the density dependence for one fixed cloud distribution.
  2. [Section 6.2, Figure 13] The jet-power independence of the peak frequency is tested with only two jet powers (1044 and 1043 erg s–1) in a single environment, and the shaded regions in Figure 13 represent fitting uncertainties only, not systematic variations of the environment or jet physics. The absence of explicit jet-power dependence in Eq. (9) makes the result unsurprising at the level of the absorption coefficient, but the simulations are needed to show that jet-induced cloud clearing does not break this dependence for the tested cases. The claim should be framed as applying to the parameter range explored, and the statement in Section 6.2 that 'the turnover frequency and general shape of the spectrum do not change with jet power' should be qualified accordingly.
  3. [Section 2.2, Section 4.2, Table 2] The simulation suite is very small for the breadth of the conclusions: one group environment, two ISM densities, two jet powers, and one lognormal fractal cloud realization (with two 90-degree rotations serving as additional realizations for morphology but not for the spectral analysis). The persistence of asymmetries in poor-group environments is demonstrated for a single group profile and a single host galaxy, and the νp–LS relation is derived from two density normalizations. The paper should state more explicitly that the quantitative results, particularly the proposed density calibration, are proof-of-concept and may shift when the cloud geometry, group profile, or jet velocity is varied.
minor comments (5)
  1. [Section 5.1] There is a typo: 'making it difficult to to draw conclusions' should read 'making it difficult to draw conclusions'.
  2. [Figures 10, 14, 15] Several figure labels and captions contain placeholder characters (e.g., '□' in density and surface brightness units), which should be replaced with proper superscripts or symbols in the production version.
  3. [Section 6.1] The statement that an ISM density of 150 cm–3 is 'perhaps more representative of the environments surrounding observed sources' is based on only two density normalizations and one cloud geometry; this sentence should be tempered to avoid overinterpreting the comparison with observational data.
  4. [Section 2.2] A brief quantitative statement about the expected effect of radiative cooling on the cloud ablation timescales, rather than only a qualitative reference to Antonuccio-Delogu & Silk (2008), would help the reader assess the robustness of the asymmetry results.
  5. [References] The citation to 'Stewart et al. 2024, private communication' for the smoothing-kernel method is not verifiable; if this method is described in a paper in preparation or in a thesis, that should be cited instead.

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged · score 0.0 of 10

No significant circularity; the peak-frequency result follows from the FFA coefficient and simulation tests, though the ISM-probe calibration is incomplete.

full rationale

The central derivation is self-contained and not circular. The peak-frequency result follows from the standard free-free absorption coefficient (Eq. 9), which has no explicit jet-power dependence; the simulations then test whether jet-cloud clearing changes the absorbing column for the two jet powers (Section 6.2, Fig. 13), so the claimed independence is a numerical result rather than a fitted input. The ISM-density dependence is likewise tested by varying n_w,0 between 150 and 400 cm^-3 in an otherwise fixed environment (Section 6.1). The comparison to the observed nu_p-LS data of O'Dea & Baum (1997) and Jeyakumar (2016) provides external grounding. Self-citations (e.g., Turner et al. 2023 for the 0.1c jet speed; Yates-Jones et al. 2022 for emissivity) are methodological and not load-bearing for the headline claim. The important caveat is that the paper itself concedes in Section 6.1 that the nu_p-LS relation 'is likely to also depend on the scales over which the clouds are distributed' and that the simulated absorbing clouds extend only to 2.5 kpc; therefore the proposed 'probe of the ISM' is not yet uniquely calibrated for arbitrary real ISM geometries. That is a validity/calibration limitation, not circularity: no equation is defined in terms of the target result, and no fitted parameter is relabelled as a prediction.

Assumptions & free parameters 5 free parameters · 6 assumptions · 0 invented entities

The central results depend on several chosen inputs: the cloud density normalization, the extent of the clumpy ISM, the FFA temperature cutoff, the fractal cloud scales, and the jet speed. These are not fitted to the observational relations the paper compares against; they are representative values from the literature. No new physical entities are introduced.

free parameters (5)
  • mean central warm cloud density nw,0 = 400 cm^-3 (reference), 150 cm^-3 (low-density run)
    Chosen by hand to represent ISM densities; the claimed ISM-density dependence of the turnover frequency is demonstrated by changing this parameter.
  • host galaxy radius rgal = 2.5 kpc
    Sets the spatial extent of the multiphase ISM and hence the source sizes over which FFA turnover appears; the paper notes this limits FFA signatures to a few kpc.
  • FFA temperature cutoff T_cut = 1.05e4 K
    Gas below this temperature is assumed neutral with zero free-free absorption; directly affects the optical depth and thus the predicted turnover frequency.
  • cloud fractal correlation scales = 20 to 250 pc
    Determines the clumpiness of the ISM encountered by the jets; affects the jet-cloud interaction details and asymmetries.
  • jet speed vjet = 0.1 c
    Chosen to approximate the average bulk velocity of a mildly relativistic spine-sheath jet; sets the jet density via Eq. (6) and the ram pressure balance in Eq. (11).
assumptions (6)
  • standard math Euler equations with ideal equation of state solved by PLUTO adequately model jet-environment interaction
    Section 2.2; standard compressible hydrodynamics.
  • domain assumption The multiphase ISM is represented by lognormal fractal clouds in pressure equilibrium with hot gas, without self-gravity
    Section 2.1.3, following Mukherjee et al. (2016); a simplified but common representation.
  • domain assumption Free-free absorption, not synchrotron self-absorption, dominates the spectral turnover
    Section 1; argued for the environments studied, following Bicknell et al. (2018).
  • domain assumption Non-relativistic jets at 0.1c capture the dynamics of relativistic spine-sheath jets
    Section 2.2; justified by mass-loading arguments from Turner et al. (2023).
  • domain assumption Radiative cooling is negligible because unmodelled feedback prevents catastrophic cooling
    Section 2.2; the authors state small-scale dynamics are likely missed.
  • ad hoc to paper Gas below 1.05e4 K is neutral and does not absorb free-free
    Section 2.3; a modeling cutoff consistent with Mukherjee et al. (2016).

how reviews work

0 comments
Cite this review

Pith. "Pith review of Spectral signatures of young radio galaxies." pith.science (2026). https://pith.science/paper/WSBECBLP

@misc{pith2026241214433,
  author       = {Pith},
  title        = {Pith review of: Spectral signatures of young radio galaxies},
  year         = {2026},
  howpublished = {\url{https://pith.science/paper/WSBECBLP}},
  note         = {Machine review of arXiv:2412.14433}
}
read the original abstract

We investigate the evolution of active galactic nucleus jets on kiloparsec-scales due to their interaction with the clumpy interstellar medium (ISM) of the host galaxy and, subsequently, the surrounding circumgalactic environment. Hydrodynamic simulations of this jet-environment interaction are presented for a range of jet kinetic powers, peak densities of the multiphase ISM, and scale radii of the larger-scale environment -- characteristic of either a galaxy cluster or poor group. Synthetic radio images are generated by considering the combination of synchrotron radiation from the jet plasma and free-free absorption from the multiphase ISM. We find that jet propagation is slowed by interactions with a few very dense clouds in the host galaxy ISM, producing asymmetries in lobe length and brightness which persist to scales of tens of kpc for poor group environments. The classification of kiloparsec-scale jets is highly dependent on surface brightness sensitivity and resolution. Our simulations of young active sources can appear as restarted sources, showing double-double lobe morphology, high core prominence (CP > 0.1), and the expected radio spectra for both the inner- and outer-lobe components. We qualitatively reproduce the observed inverse correlation between peak frequency and source size, and find that the peak frequency of the integrated radio spectrum depends on ISM density but not the jet power. Spectral turnover in resolved young radio sources therefore provides a new probe of the ISM.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2412.14433 by the authors.

Figure 1
Figure 1. Density profiles for the diffuse gas in a galaxy cluster (red) and poor group (blue), each comprising an isothermal β-profile (dashed lines) and double isothermal galaxy profile (grey dotted). 2.1.3 Host galaxy scales – dense clouds The warm clouds of the multiphase ISM are assumed to follow a lognormal density distribution, following the approach of Mukherjee et al. (2016). A lognormal fractal cube was gener￾ated u… view at source ↗
Figure 2
Figure 2. Midplane density slice for the ‘reference’ simulation (n400-Q44) at a source age of 1 Myr. axis compared to the reference simulation and has the effect of changing the density profile encountered by the jet as it proceeds through the host galaxy. The effect of the rotated environment is discussed in detail in Section 4.1 [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p006_2.png] view at source ↗
Figure 3
Figure 3. Midplane density slice for all simulations at source ages of 0.5, 1, 1.5, and 2 Myr [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p007_3.png] view at source ↗
Figures from the paper (12 more)
Figure 4
Figure 4. Figure 4: Synthetic radio emission for all simulations at source ages of 0.5, 1, 1.5, and 2 Myr. The observing frequency is 1.4 GHz with a beam FWHM of 0.3 arcsec; contours are spaced logarithmically by 1.1 dex between 0.1 and 3000 mJy beam–1 [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_…
Figure 5
Figure 5. Figure 5: Total source size as a function of source age for all simulations. 1 2 4 6 8 10 20 40 60 Source size (kpc) 1024 1025 1026 1.4 GHz Luminosity (W Hz −1) n400-Q44 n400-Q44-noclouds n150-Q44 n400-Q44-group n400-Q43 [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p009_5.png]
Figure 6
Figure 6. Figure 6: Total source luminosity at 1.4 GHz as a function of source size for all simulations. Rotated environment simulations (n400-Q44-xaxis and n400- Q44-yaxis) are not included for clarity; these show very similar evolution to n400-Q44. Vertical markers are shown every 0.2 M…
Figure 7
Figure 7. Figure 7: shows the evolution of the cloud mass for the north and south dense clouds. For both simulations considered here, the northern cloud loses mass faster than the southern cloud, due to the fact that it is completely ablated by the jet during the head-on interaction. Conv…
Figure 9
Figure 9. Figure 9: shows the lobe brightness ratio (BR) for each simulation as a function of total source size. Excluding emission from within the host galaxy (i.e. r < 2.5 kpc), this is defined as the 1.4 GHz radio power of the primary lobe divided by that of the secondary lobe. As with…
Figure 8
Figure 8. Figure 8: Length asymmetry between jet and counterjet, defined as l(primary jet)/l(counterjet) for jet length l. We note that the primary jet is always the longer of the two jets; this is the southern jet for simulation n400-Q44-xaxis, and the northern jet for the remaining simu…
Figure 10
Figure 10. Figure 10: First column: Midplane density slice for simulations n400-Q44 (at t = 3.5 Myr, top row) and n400-Q44-group (at t = 3.0 Myr, bottom row). Second column: Synthetic surface brightness at a redshift of z = 0.05. Red contours represent emission detected by LOFAR at 150 MHz…
Figure 11
Figure 11. Figure 11: Core prominence, defined as P1.4 GHz(r < 2.5 kpc) / P1.4 GHz(whole source), for our simulations as a function of their total source size. connected northern component, with the morphology caused by lobe asymmetries and the diffuse large-scale environment. The degree o…
Figure 12
Figure 12. Figure 12: Example synchrotron radio spectra for (L-R) n400-Q44, n150-Q44, and n400-Q43 simulations. Spectra are shown for total source sizes of 1.5, 3, 4.5, and 7 kpc. signatures will be possible for more realistic gas–jet geometries, such as jets which are inclined with respec…
Figure 13
Figure 13. Figure 13: Evolution of (rest-frame) peak frequency with source size for simulations with different ISM densities (top, n400-Q44 and n150-Q44) and jet powers (bottom, n400-Q44 and n400-Q43). Shaded regions represent uncertainty in peak frequency values. Blue points represent the…
Figure 14
Figure 14. Figure 14: Midplane density slices in the xz (left), yz (middle), and xy (right) planes for the northern (top row) and southern (bottom row) clouds at t = 0, overlaid with a jet cylinder of radius 0.1 kpc [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p018_14.png]
Figure 15
Figure 15. Figure 15: Surface brightness along the jet axis (x = 0) for the sources shown in [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p019_15.png]

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Forward citations

Cited by 1 Pith paper

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score. Full citation record

  1. Connection between steep radio spectral slopes and dust extinction in QSOs: evidence for outflow-driven shocks in dusty QSO

    astro-ph.GA 2025-01 conditional novelty 6.0 of 10

    QSOs with higher dust extinction preferentially show steep radio spectra and fewer peaked SEDs, linking radio emission to outflow-driven shocks.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

83 extracted references · 8 canonical work pages · cited by 1 Pith paper

  1. [1]

    , " * write output.state after.block = add.period write newline

    ENTRY address archivePrefix author booktitle chapter doi edition editor eprint howpublished institution journal key month note number organization pages publisher school series title type volume year label extra.label sort.label short.list INTEGERS output.state before.all mid.sentence after.sentence after.block FUNCTION init.state.consts #0 'before.all :=...

  2. [2]

    write newline

    " write newline "" before.all 'output.state := FUNCTION format.doi doi empty "" "doi:" doi * if FUNCTION format.eprint eprint empty "" archivePrefix empty "" archivePrefix ":" * if eprint field.or.null * if FUNCTION format.pid eprint empty format.doi format.eprint if FUNCTION n.dashify 't := "" t empty not t #1 #1 substring "-" = t #1 #2 substring "--" = ...

  3. [3]

    2002, http://dx.doi.org/10.1046/j.1365-8711.2002.05638.x , 335, 610

    Alexander , P. 2002, http://dx.doi.org/10.1046/j.1365-8711.2002.05638.x , 335, 610

    arXiv 2002

  4. [4]

    W., Dunn , R

    Allen , S. W., Dunn , R. J. H., Fabian , A. C., Taylor , G. B., & Reynolds , C. S. 2006, http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2966.2006.10778.x , 372, 21

    arXiv 2006

  5. [6]

    M., Lim , P

    Astropy Collaboration , Price-Whelan , A. M., Lim , P. L., et al. 2022, http://dx.doi.org/10.3847/1538-4357/ac7c74 , 935, 167

    doi:10.3847/1538-4357/ac7c74 2022

  6. [7]

    D., Williams , D

    Baldi , R. D., Williams , D. R. A., McHardy , I. M., et al. 2018, http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/mnras/sty342 , 476, 3478

    doi:10.1093/mnras/sty342 2018

  7. [9]

    Bicknell , G. V. 1984, http://dx.doi.org/10.1086/162577 , 286, 68

    doi:10.1086/162577 1984

  8. [10]

    1994, http://dx.doi.org/10.1086/173748 , 422, 542

    ---. 1994, http://dx.doi.org/10.1086/173748 , 422, 542

    doi:10.1086/173748 1994

Show all 83 references
  1. [11]

    V., Dopita , M

    Bicknell , G. V., Dopita , M. A., & O'Dea , C. P. O. 1997, http://dx.doi.org/10.1086/304400 , 485, 112

    1997 doi

  2. [12]

    V., Mukherjee , D., Wagner , A

    Bicknell , G. V., Mukherjee , D., Wagner , A. Y., Sutherland , R. S., & Nesvadba , N. P. H. 2018, http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/mnras/sty070 , 475, 3493

    2018 doi

  3. [13]

    2017, http://dx.doi.org/10.1051/0004-6361/201730932 , 606, A98

    Brienza , M., Godfrey , L., Morganti , R., et al. 2017, http://dx.doi.org/10.1051/0004-6361/201730932 , 606, A98

    2017 doi

  4. [14]

    2020, http://dx.doi.org/10.1051/0004-6361/202037457 , 638, A29

    Brienza , M., Morganti , R., Harwood , J., et al. 2020, http://dx.doi.org/10.1051/0004-6361/202037457 , 638, A29

    2020 doi

  5. [15]

    R., Gaensler , B

    Callingham , J. R., Gaensler , B. M., Ekers , R. D., et al. 2015, http://dx.doi.org/10.1088/0004-637X/809/2/168 , 809, 168

    2015 doi

  6. [16]

    R., Ekers , R

    Callingham , J. R., Ekers , R. D., Gaensler , B. M., et al. 2017, http://dx.doi.org/10.3847/1538-4357/836/2/174 , 836, 174

    2017 doi

  7. [17]

    1976, , 49, 137

    Cavaliere , A., & Fusco-Femiano , R. 1976, , 49, 137

    1976

  8. [18]

    H., Pratt , G

    Croston , J. H., Pratt , G. W., B \"o hringer , H., et al. 2008, http://dx.doi.org/10.1051/0004-6361:20079154 , 487, 431

    2008 doi

  9. [19]

    J., Springel , V., White , S

    Croton , D. J., Springel , V., White , S. D. M., et al. 2006, http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2966.2005.09675.x , 365, 11

    2006

  10. [20]

    J., & Krause , M

    English , W., Hardcastle , M. J., & Krause , M. G. H. 2016, http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/mnras/stw1407 , 461, 2025

    2016 doi

  11. [21]

    Fabian , A. C. 2012, http://dx.doi.org/10.1146/annurev-astro-081811-125521 , 50, 455

    2012 doi

  12. [23]

    2012, http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2966.2012.21479.x , 425, 438

    Gaibler , V., Khochfar , S., Krause , M., & Silk , J. 2012, http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2966.2012.21479.x , 425, 438

    2012

  13. [24]

    2012, http://dx.doi.org/10.1088/0004-637X/746/1/94 , 746, 94

    Gaspari , M., Ruszkowski , M., & Sharma , P. 2012, http://dx.doi.org/10.1088/0004-637X/746/1/94 , 746, 94

    2012 doi

  14. [25]

    J., G \"u rkan , G., van Weeren , R

    Hardcastle , M. J., G \"u rkan , G., van Weeren , R. J., et al. 2016, http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/mnras/stw1763 , 462, 1910

    2016 doi

  15. [26]

    J., Williams , W

    Hardcastle , M. J., Williams , W. L., Best , P. N., et al. 2019, http://dx.doi.org/10.1051/0004-6361/201833893 , 622, A12

    2019 doi

  16. [27]

    R., Millman, K

    Harris, C. R., Millman, K. J., van der Walt, S. J., et al. 2020, http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/s41586-020-2649-2 Nature , 585, 357

    2020 doi

  17. [28]

    Hunter , J. D. 2007, http://dx.doi.org/10.1109/MCSE.2007.55 Comput. Sci. Eng. , 9, 90

    2007 doi

  18. [29]

    2016, http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/mnras/stw181 , 458, 3786

    Jeyakumar , S. 2016, http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/mnras/stw181 , 458, 3786

    2016 doi

  19. [30]

    2020, http://dx.doi.org/10.1051/0004-6361/201936955 , 638, A34

    Jurlin , N., Morganti , R., Brienza , M., et al. 2020, http://dx.doi.org/10.1051/0004-6361/201936955 , 638, A34

    2020 doi

  20. [31]

    R., & Alexander , P

    Kaiser , C. R., & Alexander , P. 1997, http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/mnras/286.1.215 , 286, 215

    1997 doi

  21. [32]

    F., Allison , J

    Kerrison , E. F., Allison , J. R., Moss , V. A., Sadler , E. M., & Rees , G. A. 2024, http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/mnras/stae1796

    2024 doi

  22. [33]

    1962, http://dx.doi.org/10.1086/108756 , 67, 471

    King , I. 1962, http://dx.doi.org/10.1086/108756 , 67, 471

    1962 doi

  23. [34]

    2016, in Positioning and Power in Academic Publishing: Players, Agents and Agendas , ed

    Kluyver , T., Ragan-Kelley , B., P \'e rez , F., et al. 2016, in Positioning and Power in Academic Publishing: Players, Agents and Agendas , ed. F. Loizides & B. Schmidt (Netherlands: IOS Press), 87

    2016

  24. [35]

    2005, http://dx.doi.org/10.1051/0004-6361:20041191 , 431, 45

    Krause , M. 2005, http://dx.doi.org/10.1051/0004-6361:20041191 , 431, 45

    2005 doi

  25. [36]

    V., & Dopita , M

    Kuncic , Z., Bicknell , G. V., & Dopita , M. A. 1998, http://dx.doi.org/10.1086/311202 , 495, L35

    1998 doi

  26. [37]

    G., & Brighenti , F

    Mathews , W. G., & Brighenti , F. 2003, http://dx.doi.org/10.1146/annurev.astro.41.090401.094542 , 41, 191

    2003

  27. [38]

    2007, http://dx.doi.org/10.1086/513316 , 170, 228

    Mignone , A., Bodo , G., Massaglia , S., et al. 2007, http://dx.doi.org/10.1086/513316 , 170, 228

    2007 doi

  28. [39]

    V., Sutherland , R., & Wagner , A

    Mukherjee , D., Bicknell , G. V., Sutherland , R., & Wagner , A. 2016, http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/mnras/stw1368 , 461, 967

    2016 doi

  29. [40]

    V., Wagner , A

    Mukherjee , D., Bicknell , G. V., Wagner , A. Y., Sutherland , R. S., & Silk , J. 2018, http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/mnras/sty1776 , 479, 5544

    2018 doi

  30. [42]

    Nandi , S., & Saikia , D. J. 2012, http://dx.doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.1208.1941 Bull. Astron. Soc. India , 40, 121

    2012 doi arXiv

  31. [43]

    F., Frenk , C

    Navarro , J. F., Frenk , C. S., & White , S. D. M. 1996, http://dx.doi.org/10.1086/177173 , 462, 563

    1996 doi

  32. [44]

    O'Dea , C. P. 1998, http://dx.doi.org/10.1086/316162 , 110, 493

    1998 doi

  33. [45]

    P., & Baum , S

    O'Dea , C. P., & Baum , S. A. 1997, http://dx.doi.org/10.1086/118241 , 113, 148

    1997 doi

  34. [46]

    P., & Saikia , D

    O'Dea , C. P., & Saikia , D. J. 2021, http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00159-021-00131-w , 29, 3

    2021 doi

  35. [47]

    2016, http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/asna.201512257 Astron

    Orienti , M. 2016, http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/asna.201512257 Astron. Nachr. , 337, 9

    2016 doi

  36. [48]

    2011, http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2966.2010.17789.x , 411, 1547

    Padovani , P. 2011, http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2966.2010.17789.x , 411, 1547

    2011

  37. [49]

    2024, http://dx.doi.org/10.1051/0004-6361/202348624 , 684, A45

    Perucho , M. 2024, http://dx.doi.org/10.1051/0004-6361/202348624 , 684, A45

    2024 doi

  38. [50]

    2019, http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/mnras/sty2912 , 482, 3718

    Perucho , M., Mart \' , J.-M., & Quilis , V. 2019, http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/mnras/sty2912 , 482, 3718

    2019 doi

  39. [51]

    Planck Collaboration , Ade , P. A. R., Aghanim , N., et al. 2016, http://dx.doi.org/10.1051/0004-6361/201525830 , 594, A13

    2016 doi

  40. [52]

    S., Croton , D

    Raouf , M., Shabala , S. S., Croton , D. J., Khosroshahi , H. G., & Bernyk , M. 2017, http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/mnras/stx1598 , 471, 658

    2017 doi

  41. [53]

    Readhead , A. C. S., Taylor , G. B., Xu , W., et al. 1996, http://dx.doi.org/10.1086/176996 , 460, 612

    1996 doi

  42. [54]

    E., Turner , R

    Rodman , P. E., Turner , R. J., Shabala , S. S., et al. 2019, http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/mnras/sty3070 , 482, 5625

    2019 doi

  43. [55]

    R., Parma , P., Fanti , C., & Fanti , R

    Ruiter de de Ruiter, H. R., Parma , P., Fanti , C., & Fanti , R. 1990, , 227, 351

    1990

  44. [56]

    M., Jenkins , C

    Sadler , E. M., Jenkins , C. R., & Kotanyi , C. G. 1989, http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/mnras/240.3.591 , 240, 591

    1989 doi

  45. [57]

    A., Bower , R

    Schaye , J., Crain , R. A., Bower , R. G., et al. 2015, http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/mnras/stu2058 , 446, 521

    2015 doi

  46. [58]

    P., de Bruyn , A

    Schoenmakers , A. P., de Bruyn , A. G., R \"o ttgering , H. J. A., van der Laan , H., & Kaiser , C. R. 2000, http://dx.doi.org/10.1046/j.1365-8711.2000.03430.x , 315, 371

    2000

  47. [59]

    2009, http://dx.doi.org/10.1088/0004-637X/699/1/525 , 699, 525

    Shabala , S., & Alexander , P. 2009, http://dx.doi.org/10.1088/0004-637X/699/1/525 , 699, 525

    2009 doi

  48. [60]

    S., Ash , S., Alexander , P., & Riley , J

    Shabala , S. S., Ash , S., Alexander , P., & Riley , J. M. 2008, http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2966.2008.13459.x , 388, 625

    2008

  49. [61]

    S., Jurlin , N., Morganti , R., et al

    Shabala , S. S., Jurlin , N., Morganti , R., et al. 2020, http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/mnras/staa1172 , 496, 1706

    2020 doi

  50. [62]

    W., R \"o ttgering , H

    Shimwell , T. W., R \"o ttgering , H. J. A., Best , P. N., et al. 2017, http://dx.doi.org/10.1051/0004-6361/201629313 , 598, A104

    2017 doi

  51. [63]

    2013, http://dx.doi.org/10.1088/0004-637X/772/2/112 , 772, 112

    Silk , J. 2013, http://dx.doi.org/10.1088/0004-637X/772/2/112 , 772, 112

    2013 doi

  52. [64]

    Snellen , I. A. G., Schilizzi , R. T., de Bruyn , A. G., et al. 1998, http://dx.doi.org/10.1051/aas:1998281 , 131, 435

    1998 doi

  53. [65]

    Stewart , G. S. C., Turner , R. J., & Shabala , S. S. 2024, private communication

    2024

  54. [66]

    S., & Bicknell , G

    Sutherland , R. S., & Bicknell , G. V. 2007, http://dx.doi.org/10.1086/520640 , 173, 37

    2007 doi

  55. [67]

    S., & Dopita , M

    Sutherland , R. S., & Dopita , M. A. 2017, http://dx.doi.org/10.3847/1538-4365/aa6541 , 229, 34

    2017 doi

  56. [68]

    Tanner , R., & Weaver , K. A. 2022, http://dx.doi.org/10.3847/1538-3881/ac4d23 , 163, 134

    2022 doi

  57. [69]

    2014, http://dx.doi.org/10.1051/0004-6361/201423585 , 566, A1

    Tempel , E., Tamm , A., Gramann , M., et al. 2014, http://dx.doi.org/10.1051/0004-6361/201423585 , 566, A1

    2014 doi

  58. [70]

    J., & de Kool , M

    Tingay , S. J., & de Kool , M. 2003, http://dx.doi.org/10.1086/376600 , 126, 723

    2003 doi

  59. [71]

    J., Macquart , J

    Tingay , S. J., Macquart , J. P., Collier , J. D., et al. 2015, http://dx.doi.org/10.1088/0004-6256/149/2/74 , 149, 74

    2015 doi

  60. [72]

    J., Rogers , J

    Turner , R. J., Rogers , J. G., Shabala , S. S., & Krause , M. G. H. 2018, http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/mnras/stx2591 , 473, 4179

    2018 doi

  61. [73]

    J., & Shabala , S

    Turner , R. J., & Shabala , S. S. 2015, http://dx.doi.org/10.1088/0004-637X/806/1/59 , 806, 59

    2015 doi

  62. [74]

    2019, http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/mnras/stz922 , 486, 1225

    ---. 2019, http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/mnras/stz922 , 486, 1225

    2019 doi

  63. [75]

    J., Yates-Jones , P

    Turner , R. J., Yates-Jones , P. M., Shabala , S. S., Quici , B., & Stewart , G. S. C. 2023, http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/mnras/stac2998 , 518, 945

    2023 doi

  64. [76]

    2006, http://dx.doi.org/10.1086/500288 , 640, 691

    Vikhlinin , A., Kravtsov , A., Forman , W., et al. 2006, http://dx.doi.org/10.1086/500288 , 640, 691

    2006 doi

  65. [77]

    E., et al

    Virtanen , P., Gommers , R., Oliphant , T. E., et al. 2020, http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/s41592-019-0686-2 Nat. Methods , 17, 261

    2020 doi

  66. [78]

    Vries de de Vries, N., Snellen , I. A. G., Schilizzi , R. T., & Mack , K. H. 2009, http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/asna.200811159 Astron. Nachr. , 330, 214

    2009 doi

  67. [79]

    Y., & Bicknell , G

    Wagner , A. Y., & Bicknell , G. V. 2011, http://dx.doi.org/10.1088/0004-637X/728/1/29 , 728, 29

    2011 doi

  68. [80]

    Y., Bicknell , G

    Wagner , A. Y., Bicknell , G. V., & Umemura , M. 2012, http://dx.doi.org/10.1088/0004-637X/757/2/136 , 757, 136

    2012 doi

  69. [81]

    Y., Bicknell , G

    Wagner , A. Y., Bicknell , G. V., Umemura , M., Sutherland , R. S., & Silk , J. 2016, http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/asna.201512287 Astron. Nachr. , 337, 167

    2016 doi

  70. [82]

    2023, http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/mnras/stad1396 , 523, 1104

    Weinberger , R., Su , K.-Y., Ehlert , K., et al. 2023, http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/mnras/stad1396 , 523, 1104

    2023 doi

  71. [83]

    M., Shabala , S

    Yates-Jones , P. M., Shabala , S. S., & Krause , M. G. H. 2021, http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/mnras/stab2917 , 508, 5239

    2021 doi

  72. [84]

    M., Shabala , S

    Yates-Jones , P. M., Shabala , S. S., Power , C., et al. 2023, http://dx.doi.org/10.1017/pasa.2023.10 , 40, e014

    2023 doi

  73. [85]

    M., Turner , R

    Yates-Jones , P. M., Turner , R. J., Shabala , S. S., & Krause , M. G. H. 2022, http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/mnras/stac385 , 511, 5225

    2022 doi

  74. [86]

    1996, http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/mnras/278.2.488 , 278, 488

    Zhao , H. 1996, http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/mnras/278.2.488 , 278, 488

    1996 doi

  75. [87]

    write newline

    " write newline "" before.all 'output.state := FUNCTION format.archive archivePrefix empty "" archivePrefix ":" * if FUNCTION format.primaryClass primaryClass empty "" " [" primaryClass * "]" * if FUNCTION format.eprint eprint empty pages empty not booktitle empty not or or ""...

Pith tools

Reviewed August 11, 2026 · model on record in the stance chip above.