Pith. sign in

REVIEW 1 cited by

Inverse initial problem under Nash strategy for stochastic reaction-diffusion equations with dynamic boundary conditions

Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.

This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.

SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event

T0 review · schema-true

One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.

pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp

arxiv 2410.10007 v1 pith:WUZSSI4A submitted 2024-10-13 math.AP

classification math.AP
keywords equationsconditionsinitialstochasticbackwardboundarydynamicforward
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal
0 comments
read the original abstract

In this paper, we study a multi-objective inverse initial problem with a Nash strategy constraint for forward stochastic reaction-diffusion equations with dynamic boundary conditions, where both the volume and surface equations are influenced by randomness. The objective is twofold: first, we maintain the state close to prescribed targets in fixed regions using two controls; second, we determine the history of the solution from observations at the final time. To achieve this, we establish new Carleman estimates for forward and backward equations, which are used to prove an interpolation inequality for a coupled forward-backward stochastic system. Consequently, we obtain two results: backward uniqueness and a conditional stability estimate for the initial conditions.

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Forward citations

Cited by 1 Pith paper

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score. Full citation record

  1. Insensitizing controls for stochastic parabolic equations with dynamic boundary conditions

    math.OC 2024-11 reject novelty 6.0 of 10

    The authors attempt to prove existence of insensitizing controls for a stochastic heat equation with dynamic boundary conditions, but a key Carleman-to-observability step in the proof is invalid.

Pith tools