Pith. sign in

REVIEW 2 major objections 4 minor 44 references

On the trend to global equilibrium for Kuramoto Oscillators

T0 review · 2 major / 4 minor · reviewed 2026-08-14 · deepseek-v4-flash

Challenge this review Re-run · record.json Download PDF Read on arXiv ↗ Review JSON

Pith's one-line read This paper claims that generic smooth data for the Kuramoto-Sakaguchi equation converge exponentially fast to the stable phase-locked state, with a quantified waiting time.

desk verdict A serious, genuinely new quantitative relaxation result whose explicit time scale currently rests on an unjustified dropped term in Corollary 5.1; worth refereeing, but only after a fix. read the letter →

arxiv 1908.07657 v1 pith:WWLOPVVR submitted 2019-08-21 math.AP

Javier Morales , David Poyato This is my paper · ORCID
classification math.AP MSC 34C1534D0635B4035Q7035Q8370F9992B2092B25
keywords KuramotomodelsynchronizationKuramoto-SakaguchiequationWassersteindistanceentropyproductionTalagrandinequalitylogarithmicSobolevorderparameter
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal

The pith

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The reading

This paper claims that, in the strong-coupling regime $W/K \leq C R_0^3$ (frequency spread small compared with coupling), any smooth solution of the Kuramoto-Sakaguchi equation starting from generic initial data converges exponentially fast to the unique stable phase-locked equilibrium. The convergence is measured in the quadratic Wasserstein distance, and the waiting time $T_0$ before the exponential tail is bounded by $(1/(K R_0^2)) \log(1 + W^{1/2}\|f_0\|_2 + 1/R_0)$. If this is right, it is the first quantitative relaxation rate for this equation from generic initial data, not just from initial data confined to an arc. It also yields a statistical statement for the finite-particle Kuramoto model: for a large random sample of $N$ oscillators, the empirical measure concentrates around the global equilibrium at a controlled rate with probability tending to one as $N$ grows.

What carries the argument

The load-bearing object is the fibered quadratic Wasserstein distance $W_{2,g}$, defined by gluing the usual quadratic Wasserstein distances between the conditional phase distributions on each frequency fiber, with the common frequency marginal $g$ held fixed. Because the Kuramoto-Sakaguchi equation is not a Wasserstein gradient flow, this distance supplies the replacement structure: it is ordered below the ambient $W_2$, it satisfies a dissipation-transportation inequality, and in the convex region it supports the local logarithmic Sobolev and Talagrand-type inequalities that produce the exponential tail. The other named mechanism is the dyadic subdivision of time by doublings of $R^2$, with intervals classified by whether dissipation is above or below a scale-dependent threshold, paired with sliding norms on sets transported by the continuity equation.

What would settle it

Evaluate inequality (5.34) with $R_0 = 0.9$ and $W/K = C R_0^3$: the first term equals $(10/3)(0.9)^2 \approx 2.7$, not the $1/30$ required to discard it, so checking this single inequality determines whether the proof's bound on the interval lengths, and hence on $T_0$, actually follows from the hypotheses.

Watch

Extended reading notes

Core claim

On the paper's own terms, the discovery is that the nonconvex relaxation splits into a transient and a tail. Before $T_0$, the order parameter $R(t)$ is forced upward by entropy production whenever dissipation is large, while a new instability estimate for antipodal equilibria drains mass out of the hemisphere opposite the mean phase whenever dissipation is small; sliding norms propagated along the characteristic flow shuttle information between the two regimes. After $T_0$, the solution lies in a region where local displacement convexity holds, and generalized logarithmic Sobolev and Talagrand-type inequalities for the fibered Wasserstein distance $W_{2,g}$ convert the exponential decay of dissipation into $W_2(f(t), f_\infty) \lesssim e^{-(1/40)K(t-T_0)}$. The limiting state is identified as the unique global equilibrium up to phase rotation.

Load-bearing premise

The waiting-time bound rests on dropping a term of size $(10/3)R_{k_0}^2$ in inequality (5.34) of Corollary 5.1; the stated hypotheses allow $R_0$ close to 1, where that term is about 3 and is not small enough to ignore.

Editorial extensions

If this is right

  • After $T_0$, the Wasserstein distance to the global equilibrium decays like $e^{-K(t-T_0)/40}$, and $T_0$ is at most a constant times $(1/(K R_0^2)) \log(1 + W^{1/2}\|f_0\|_2 + 1/R_0)$.
  • From $T_0$ onward the order parameter stays above $3/5$ and the mass outside a fixed arc around the mean phase decays as $e^{-K(t-T_0)/20}$.
  • For $N$ particles drawn independently from $f_0$, once $\log N$ is of order $(1/R_0^2) \log(1 + W^{1/2}\|f_0\|_2 + 1/R_0)$, with probability at least $1 - C_1 e^{-C_2 N^{1/2}}$ the particle configuration keeps at least $1 - (1/5)e^{-K(s-T_0)/20}$ of its mass in a time-dependent interval and its diameter contracts to $\max\{(4/5)e^{-K(t-s)/20}, 12W/K\}$ for all later times.
  • The equilibrium reached is unique up to phase rotation among stationary states whose phase support has diameter less than $\pi/2$.

Reading between the lines

Editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • If the $T_0$ scaling is sharp, the bottleneck for synchronization is the transient spent while the order parameter is small; experiments or simulations measuring the onset of locking at large $K$ should see the logarithmic term dominate, with a $K^{-1}R_0^{-2}$ prefactor rather than a pure exponential rate.
  • The sliding-norm mechanism, tracking $L^2$ norms on sets that move with the characteristic flow, appears transferable to other mean-field equations with explicit unstable equilibria, such as non-symmetric or weakly singular interaction kernels.
  • The concentration estimate suggests a specific finite-$N$ trade-off: $N$ must grow roughly like $\exp(C/R_0^2)$ before high-probability synchronization can be guaranteed before $T_0$; checking whether the $N^{1/2}$ in the probability exponent is optimal would be a natural numerical experiment.
Share X Bluesky LinkedIn Reddit HN

Signed reviews

No signed human review yet.

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, and a circularity audit.

Referee Report

2 major / 4 minor

Summary. This paper aims to prove a quantitative convergence rate to the stable equilibrium for the Kuramoto-Sakaguchi kinetic equation under a large-coupling condition W/K ≤ C R0^3. Theorem 1.1 states that after an explicit time T0 ≲ (K R0^2)^{-1} log(1 + W^{1/2}||f0||_2 + 1/R0), the solution is exponentially close in W2 to the unique (up to rotation) equilibrium. Corollary 1.1 translates this into a concentration estimate for empirical measures of the particle Kuramoto model, with probability 1 − C1 e^{-C2 √N}. The proof combines a fibered Wasserstein distance, entropy-production estimates, an instability estimate for antipodal equilibria, sliding L2 norms along characteristics, and a Desvillettes–Villani type subdivision into dyadic scales of the order parameter.

Significance. If the proof were complete, this would be the first quantitative relaxation rate for the Kuramoto-Sakaguchi equation from generic initial data, and the particle-system corollary would be a substantial addition. The paper is largely self-contained: the functional inequalities, the fibered-distance relation, the dissipation-transportation inequality, and the sliding-norm estimates are derived from the equation rather than fitted to the conclusion. The constructive nature of the estimates is a real strength. However, two load-bearing steps in Section 5 are not justified, so the central claim is currently not established.

major comments (2)
  1. [Section 5.1, after Eq. (5.2)] The assertion that (5.2) implies W/K ≤ C λ^2 (1−λ) R_k^2 for every k is incorrect. Since R_k ≥ R0 and the second part of (5.2) gives 1−λ ≤ (cos^2 α / 180) R0 = R0/240 with λ > 179/180, the claimed implication would require C R0^3 ≤ C λ^2 (1−λ) R0^2, i.e. R0 ≤ λ^2 (1−λ) ≤ R0/240, which is impossible for R0 ∈ (0,1]. Consequently Lemma 3.4 and Corollary 3.6 cannot be invoked on the dyadic intervals as written, and the key lower bound (5.4), R(t) ≥ λ R_k on [r_k, r_{k+1}), is unsupported. This bound is used throughout Section 5, including Corollary 5.1 and the estimate of T0.
  2. [Corollary 5.1 proof, passage from (5.34)] The first summand in (5.34) equals (10/3) R_{k0}^2, and the proof replaces it by 1/30 in the following display. This requires R_{k0} ≤ 1/10. Under the hypotheses of Theorem 1.1, R0 may be close to 1 and R_{k0} ≥ λ R0 > 179/180, so the summand can be approximately 0.833, which exceeds the right-hand side 1 − √2/2 ≈ 0.293 in (5.34). The subsequent lower bound on r_{k+1} − r_k therefore does not follow. Since the telescoping sum over the dyadic intervals in Section 5.2 is used to obtain T0, the explicit T0 estimate in Theorem 1.1 and the N* estimate in Corollary 1.1 rest on this unproved step. The gap may be repairable by a different choice of the offset s or by a stronger mass-decay estimate, but no such repair appears in the manuscript.
minor comments (4)
  1. [Throughout] There are several typos and OCR artifacts: 'Yo DA VID POYATO' on page 2, '/suppress Lojasiewicz' in references [24,29,30], 'G¨onwal' after (6.5), '/greaterorsimilar' in (5.38), and 'Collorary' in the Section 5.2 heading.
  2. [Proposition 3.1] The proof of the Benamou–Brenier representation for the fibered distance is omitted with a reference to standard gluing; a concise proof or a more precise citation would improve readability.
  3. [Corollary 5.1 statement] The statement 'for any k ≤ k*' should presumably read 'for any k0 ≤ k ≤ k*', since the subdivision and the dyadic sequence only start at k0.
  4. [Section 5.1, notation near (5.23) and (5.29)] The dependence of R_{k0} on t0 in the proof of Corollary 5.1 is introduced without comment; a brief explanation of why R_{k0} is the relevant scale for the attractor neighborhood would help the reader.

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged · score 0.0 of 10

No circularity: the quantitative convergence estimates are derived from the equation and proved inequalities; self-citations are background only.

full rationale

The paper's derivation chain is self-contained. Theorem 1.1 and Corollary 2.1 are obtained from explicit differential inequalities proved in the text: the dissipation bounds in Theorem 3.1 and Corollary 3.1, the entropy production estimates in Lemma 2.1 and Proposition 3.4, the lower bound on the order parameter in Corollary 3.6, the instability estimate for antipodal equilibria in Proposition 4.1, the sliding norm estimate in Lemma 4.1, and the dyadic subdivision analysis in Section 5. The specific self-citations ([22], [32], [38]) are not load-bearing: the fibered Wasserstein distance is defined in Definition 3.1 and its needed properties are either proved (Lemma 3.1, Proposition 3.2, Corollary 3.2) or derived from standard references; the instability estimate is not imported from [22] but proved as a refined version in Proposition 4.1; the Wasserstein stability estimate in Lemma 6.3 is proved directly rather than merely cited. No parameter is fitted to data and no 'prediction' is equivalent to an input by construction. The only substantive concern, raised by the skeptic pass, is a quantitative hypothesis check in Corollary 5.1: passing from (5.34) to the next display appears to require R_{k0} ≤ 1/10, which is not guaranteed by the stated hypotheses. That is a possible correctness gap in an estimate of interval lengths, not a circularity: it does not make the conclusion identical to an assumption or to a fitted parameter. The derivation remains independent of its inputs, so the circularity score is 0.

Assumptions & free parameters 0 free parameters · 6 assumptions · 0 invented entities

No data are fitted; the only inputs are the assumptions in Theorem 1.1. The axioms listed are background results from optimal transport and well-posedness theory. The smallness constants in the proof are universal and absorb all other choices, so they are not counted as free parameters.

assumptions (6)
  • domain assumption Classical well-posedness: for f0 in C^1(T×R) and g compactly supported, there is a unique global-in-time classical solution to (1.2).
    Invoked in Theorem 1.1 and throughout the paper; standard in the Kuramoto literature but not proved in this work.
  • standard math Benamou-Brenier representation and derivative formulas for W2 along absolutely continuous curves.
    Used in Sections 3.1 and 3.2, cited to [2], [4], and [43].
  • standard math Completeness of (Pg(T×R), W2,g).
    Used in Step 1 of Theorem 1.1 to define f∞ as the W2,g limit; follows from completeness of W2 on P(T).
  • domain assumption Mean-field limit of the particle system (1.1) to the Kuramoto-Sakaguchi equation.
    Background for Corollary 1.1, cited to Lancellotti [28].
  • domain assumption Centered frequency distribution (1.13).
    Stated as a standing assumption necessary for existence of stationary states.
  • standard math Monotone rearrangement property of one-dimensional optimal transport used to propagate diameter bounds along displacement interpolation.
    Used in Proposition 3.3 to keep the π/2 diameter bound along the interpolation.

how reviews work

0 comments
Cite this review

Pith. "Pith review of On the trend to global equilibrium for Kuramoto Oscillators." pith.science (2026). https://pith.science/paper/WWLOPVVR

@misc{pith2026190807657,
  author       = {Pith},
  title        = {Pith review of: On the trend to global equilibrium for Kuramoto Oscillators},
  year         = {2026},
  howpublished = {\url{https://pith.science/paper/WWLOPVVR}},
  note         = {Machine review of arXiv:1908.07657}
}
read the original abstract

In this paper, we study the convergence to the stable equilibrium for Kuramoto oscillators. Specifically, we derive estimates on the rate of convergence to the global equilibrium for solutions of the Kuramoto-Sakaguchi equation in a large coupling strength regime from generic initial data. As a by-product, using the stability of the equation in the Wasserstein distance, we quantify the rate at which discrete Kuramoto oscillators concentrate around the global equilibrium. In doing this, we achieve a quantitative estimate in which the probability that the oscillators will concentrate at the given rate tends to one as the number of oscillators increases. Among the essential steps in our proof are: 1) An entropy production estimate inspired by the formal Riemannian structure of the space of probability measures, first introduced by F. Otto in [35]; 2) A new quantitative estimate on the instability of equilibria with antipodal oscillators based on the dynamics of norms of the solution in sets evolving by the continuity equation; 3) The use of generalized local logarithmic Sobolev and Talagrand type inequalities, similar to the ones derived by F. Otto and C. Villani in [36]; 4) The study of a system of coupled differential inequalities, by a treatment inspired by the work of L. Desvillettes and C. Villani [13]. Since the Kuramoto-Sakaguchi equation is not a gradient flow with respect to the Wasserstein distance, we derive such inequalities under a suitable fibered transportation distance.

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

44 extracted references · 43 canonical work pages

  1. [22]

    Ha, Y.-H

    S.-Y. Ha, Y.-H. Kim, J. Morales, and J. Park, Emergence of phase concentration for the Kuramoto– Sakaguchi equation, Physica D (2019), doi:10.1016/j.physd.2019.132154

    work page arXiv 2019

  2. [32]

    Morales, Least action principles with applications to gradient flows and kinetic equations, Ph.D

    J. Morales, Least action principles with applications to gradient flows and kinetic equations, Ph.D. thesis, The University of Texas at Austin, May 2017

    work page 2017

  3. [38]

    Poyato, Filippov flows and mean-field limits in the kinetic singular K uramoto model , 2019, arXiv:1903.01305

    D. Poyato, Filippov flows and mean-field limits in the kinetic singular K uramoto model , 2019, arXiv:1903.01305

    arXiv 2019

  4. [1]

    J. A. Acebr´ on, L. L. Bonilla, C. J. P. P´ erez-Vicente, F. Ritort, and R. Spigler, The Kuramoto model: A simple paradigm for synchronization phenomena , Rev. Mod. Phys. 77 (2005), no. 1, 137–185

    work page 2005

  5. [2]

    Ambrosio, N

    L. Ambrosio, N. Gigli, and G. Savar´ e, Gradient flows in metric spaces and in the space of probabilit y measures, Birkh¨ auser, Basel, 2008

    work page 2008

  6. [3]

    Arenas, A

    A. Arenas, A. D´ ıaz-Guilera, J. Kurths, Y. Moreno, and C. Zhou, Synchronization in complex networks , Phys. Rep. 469 (2008), no. 3, 93–153

    work page 2008

  7. [4]

    Benamou and Y

    J.-D. Benamou and Y. Brenier, A computational fluid mechanics solution to the Monge–Kanto rovich mass transfer problem, Numer. Math. 84 (2000), no. 3, 375–393

    work page 2000

  8. [5]

    Benedetto, E

    D. Benedetto, E. Caglioti, and U. Montemagno, On the complete phase concentration for the Kuramoto model in the mean field limit , Commun. Math. Sci. 13 (2015), no. 7, 1775–1786

    work page 2015

Show all 44 references
  1. [6]

    Boissard, Probl` emes dinteraction discret-continu et distances de Wasserstein, Ph.D

    E. Boissard, Probl` emes dinteraction discret-continu et distances de Wasserstein, Ph.D. thesis, Universit´ e de Toulouse III, December 2011

    2011

  2. [7]

    , Simple bounds for convergence of empirical and occupation m easures in 1-Wasserstein distance, Electron. J. Probab. 16 (2011), no. 83, 2296–2333

    2011

  3. [8]

    Bolley, A

    F. Bolley, A. Guillin, and C. Villani, Quantitative concentration inequalities for empirical me asures on non-compact spaces, Probab. Theory Relat. Fields 137 (2007), no. 3–4, 541–593

    2007

  4. [9]

    Breakspear, S

    M. Breakspear, S. Heitmann, and A. Dafferstshofer, Generative models of cortical oscillations: neurobi- ological implications of the Kuramoto model , Front. Hum. Neurosci. 4 (2010), 190

    2010

  5. [10]

    J. A. Carrillo, Y.-P. Choi, S.-Y. Ha, M.-J. Kang, and Kim Y ., Contractivity of transport distances for the kinetic Kuramoto equation , J. Stat. Phys. 156 (2014), no. 2, 395–415

    2014

  6. [11]

    J. A. Carrillo, F. James, F. Lagouti` ere, and V. Vauchele t, The Filippov characteristic flow for the aggregation equation with mildly singular potentials , J. Differential Equations 260 (2016), no. 1, 304– 338

    2016

  7. [12]

    Choi, S.-Y

    Y.-P. Choi, S.-Y. Ha, S. Jung, and Y. Kim, Asymptotic formation and orbital stability of phase-locke d states for the Kuramoto model , Physica D 241 (2012), no. 7, 735–754

    2012

  8. [13]

    Desvillettes and C

    L. Desvillettes and C. Villani, On the trend to global equilibrium for spatially inhomogene ous kinetic systems: The Boltzmann equation , Invent. Math. 159 (2005), no. 2, 245–316

    2005

  9. [14]

    Dietert, Stability and bifurcation for the Kuramoto model , J

    H. Dietert, Stability and bifurcation for the Kuramoto model , J. Math. Pures Appl. 105 (2016), no. 4, 451–489

    2016

  10. [15]

    , Stability of partially locked states in the Kuramoto model t hrough Landau damping with Sobolev regularity, 2017, arXiv:1707.03475

    2017 arXiv

  11. [16]

    Dietert and Fernandez B., The mathematics of asymptotic stability in the Kuramoto mod el, Proc

    H. Dietert and Fernandez B., The mathematics of asymptotic stability in the Kuramoto mod el, Proc. R. Soc. A 474 (2018), 20180467

    2018

  12. [17]

    Dietert, B

    H. Dietert, B. Fernandez, and D. G´ erard-Varet, Landau Damping to Partially Locked States in the Kuramoto Model, Commun. Pure Appl. Math. 71 (2018), no. 5, 953–993

    2018

  13. [18]

    Dobrushin, Vlasov equations, Funct

    R. Dobrushin, Vlasov equations, Funct. Anal. Appl. 13 (1979), no. 2, 115–123

    1979

  14. [19]

    Fournier and A

    N. Fournier and A. Guillin, On the rate of convergence in Wasserstein distance of the emp irical measure, Probab. Theory Relat. Fields 162 (2015), no. 3–4, 707–738

    2015

  15. [20]

    S.-Y. Ha, T. Y. Ha, and J.-H. Kim, On the complete synchronization of the Kuramoto phase model , Physica D 239 (2010), no. 17, 1692–1700

    2010

  16. [21]

    S.-Y. Ha, H. K. Kim, and S. W. Ryoo, Emergence of phase-locked states for the Kuramoto model in a large coupling regime, Commun. Math. Sci. 14 (2016), no. 4, 1073–1091

    2016

  17. [23]

    S.-Y. Ha, D. Ko, J. Park, and X. Zhang, Collective synchronization of classical and quantum oscil lators, EMS Surv. Math. Sci. 3 (2016), no. 2, 209–267

    2016

  18. [24]

    S.-Y. Ha, Z. Li, and X. Xue, Formation of phase-locked states in a population of locally interacting Kuramoto oscillators, J. Differential Equations 255 (2013), no. 10, 3053–3070

    2013

  19. [25]

    Jordan, D

    R. Jordan, D. Kinderlehrer, and F. Otto, The variational formulation of the Fokker-Planck equation , J. Stat. Phys. 29 (1998), no. 1, 1–17

    1998

  20. [26]

    Kuramoto, Self-entrainment of a population of coupled non-linear osc illators, International Sympo- sium on Mathematical Problems in Theoretical Physics (H

    Y. Kuramoto, Self-entrainment of a population of coupled non-linear osc illators, International Sympo- sium on Mathematical Problems in Theoretical Physics (H. Araki, ed.), Lecture Notes in Physics, vol. 30, Springer-Verlag, Kyoto, Japan, 1975, pp. 420–422

    1975

  21. [27]

    , Chemical Oscillations, waves and turbulence , Springer-Verlag, Berlin, 1984. 73

    1984

  22. [28]

    Lancellotti, On the Vlasov limit for systems of nonlinearly coupled oscillators without noise, Transport Theor

    C. Lancellotti, On the Vlasov limit for systems of nonlinearly coupled oscillators without noise, Transport Theor. Stat. Phys. 34 (2005), 523–535

    2005

  23. [29]

    Z. Li, X. Xue, and D. Yu, On the /suppress lojasiewicz exponent of Kuramoto model, J. Math. Phys. 56 (2015), no. 2, 022704

    2015

  24. [30]

    /suppress Lojasiewicz,Une propri´ et´ e topologique des sous-ensembles analytiques r´ eels, Les ´Equations aux D´ eriv´ ees Partielles, vol

    S. /suppress Lojasiewicz,Une propri´ et´ e topologique des sous-ensembles analytiques r´ eels, Les ´Equations aux D´ eriv´ ees Partielles, vol. 117, Coll. du CNRS, Paris, 1962, pp. 87–89

    1962

  25. [31]

    S. C. Manrubia, A. S. Mikhailov, and D. H. Zanette, Emergence of Dynamical Order. Synchronization Phenomena in Complex Systems , World Scientific Lecture Notes in Complex System, vol. 2, Wo rld Scientific, 2004

    2004

  26. [33]

    Neunzert, An introduction to the nonlinear Boltzmann–Vlasov equatio n, Kinetic Theories and the Boltzmann Equation (C

    H. Neunzert, An introduction to the nonlinear Boltzmann–Vlasov equatio n, Kinetic Theories and the Boltzmann Equation (C. Cercignani, ed.), Lecture Notes in M athematics, vol. 1048, Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg, 1984, pp. 60–110

    1984

  27. [34]

    Otto, Evolution of microstructure in unstable porous media: A rel axational approach, Comm

    F. Otto, Evolution of microstructure in unstable porous media: A rel axational approach, Comm. Pure Appl. Math. 52 (1999), no. 7, 873–915

    1999

  28. [35]

    , The geometry of dissipative evolution equations: the porou s medium equation , Comm. Part. Differ. Equat. 26 (2001), no. 1–2, 101–174

    2001

  29. [36]

    Otto and C

    F. Otto and C. Villani, Generalization of an Inequality by Talagrand and Links with the Logarithmic Sobolev Inequality, J. Funct. Anal 173 (2000), no. 2, 361–400

    2000

  30. [37]

    Pikovsky, M

    A. Pikovsky, M. Rosenblum, and J. Kurths, Synchronization: A universal concept in nonlinear science s, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, 2001

    2001

  31. [39]

    S. H. Strogatz, From Kuramoto to Crawford: exploring the onset of synchroni zation in populations of coupled oscillators, Physica D 143 (2000), no. 1–2, 1–20

    2000

  32. [40]

    J. L. van Hemmen and W. F. Wreszinski, Lyapunov function for the Kuramoto model of nonlinearly coupled oscillators, J. Stat. Phys. 72 (1993), no. 1–2, 145–166

    1993

  33. [41]

    V. S. Varadarajan, On the convergence of sample probability distributions , Sankhya 19 (1958), no. 1–2, 23–26

    1958

  34. [42]

    S. R. S. Varadhan, Probability theory, Courant Lecture Notes, vol. 7, American Mathematical Soci ety, Basel, 2001

    2001

  35. [43]

    Villani, Optimal transport: old and new , Grundlehren der mathematischen Wissenschaften, vol

    C. Villani, Optimal transport: old and new , Grundlehren der mathematischen Wissenschaften, vol. 338 , Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg, 2009

    2009

  36. [44]

    Modeling Na- ture

    P. Villegas, P. Moretti, and M. A. Mu˜ noz, Frustrated hierarchical synchronization and emergent com - plexity in the human connectome network , Sci. Rep. 4 (2014), 5990. (Javier Morales) CSCAMM, 4141 CSIC 8169 P aint Branch Drive University of Mary land Col- lege P ark, MD 20...

    2014

Pith tools

Reviewed August 14, 2026 · model on record in the stance chip above.