Distribution of the magnetic field relative to the plane of the Galaxy in the region of the Sagittarius spiral arm

A.G. Suqiasyan; A. M. Mickaelian; G.M. Paronyan; H.R. Andreasyan; R.R. Andreasyan

REVIEW 4 major objections 6 minor 24 references

Distribution of the magnetic field relative to the plane of the Galaxy in the region of the Sagittarius spiral arm

T0 review · 4 major / 6 minor · reviewed 2026-08-01 · deepseek-v4-flash

Challenge this review Re-run · record.json Download PDF Read on arXiv ↗ Review JSON

Pith's one-line read The paper argues that the Milky Way's magnetic field in the Sagittarius-arm region is coherent and directed toward the Sun above a plane 300 pc below the midplane, and reversed below it.

desk verdict Plausible sign-map evidence for a Sagittarius-arm field direction, but the h = -300 pc boundary and the 'solely southern halo' attribution are not established because RM is a line-of-sight integral and the distance model is unnamed. read the letter →

arxiv 2607.25587 v1 pith:WZF6Q6J5 submitted 2026-07-28 astro-ph.GA

R.R. Andreasyan , H.R. Andreasyan , A. M. Mickaelian , A.G. Suqiasyan , G.M. Paronyan This is my paper · ORCID

classification astro-ph.GA

keywords GalacticmagneticfieldFaradayrotationpulsarsSagittariusspiralarmhalomeasurereversalMilkyWaystructure

verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal

The pith

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The reading

The paper uses Faraday rotation measures from 492 pulsars and more than 2,700 extragalactic radio sources to map the direction of the Milky Way's magnetic field in the direction of the Sagittarius spiral arm. It claims that north of a plane 300 pc below the Galactic midplane, the field is coherent and points toward the Sun, while south of that plane the field is reversed and weaker. This is read as evidence that the Sagittarius arm's field is aligned with the northern halo field, that the southern halo field has the opposite direction, and that in the interarm region the halo field reaches the plane and reverses there. If true, it sharpens the two-component picture of the Galactic magnetic field: flat arm fields embedded in a halo field with opposite directions in the two hemispheres.

What carries the argument

The central observational tool is the Faraday rotation measure (RM), the wavelength-dependent rotation of polarized radio emission as it passes through magnetized ionized gas, which gives the line-of-sight integral of electron density times magnetic field. The paper maps the sign of RM for pulsars with |RM| > 200 rad/m² and for extragalactic radio sources, using the boundary between predominantly positive and predominantly negative RMs to define a plane at height h = -300 pc. The RM–DM relation then provides an estimate of the mean line-of-sight field strength in the arm.

What would settle it

Find pulsars below the h = -300 pc plane and more than 2 kpc from the Sun with |RM| > 200 rad/m² and positive sign; the proposed reversal predicts no such objects, since only the negative southern halo field should contribute there. Alternatively, a pulsar with an independently measured distance and a positive RM in that region would directly contradict the claimed sign geometry.

Watch

Extended reading notes

Core claim

In the direction of the Sagittarius spiral arm (Galactic longitudes 33° to 63°), the Milky Way's magnetic field has a sharp, ordered configuration relative to the Galactic plane. North of a plane 300 pc below the formal midplane, the field is coherent and points toward the Sun, and the Sagittarius arm lies entirely north of this plane with its field aligned to the northern halo field. South of this plane, the field direction is reversed, and the small absolute rotation measures there are attributed solely to the oppositely directed southern halo field. In the interarm gap between the local Orion arm and the Sagittarius arm, the halo field extends to the Galactic plane, where the direction re

Load-bearing premise

The load-bearing premise is that a pulsar's rotation measure sign records the direction of the large-scale magnetic field along the whole line of sight, so that the small negative RMs below h = -300 pc can be attributed solely to the oppositely directed southern halo field; if turbulent or other-arm contributions are not negligible, or if the distances used to place pulsars at height h are wrong, the sign maps do not prove the claimed geometry.

Editorial extensions

If this is right

The magnetic field in the Sagittarius-arm region north of h = -300 pc is ordered and points toward the Sun, yielding large positive rotation measures.
South of h = -300 pc the field points away from the Sun, and the small negative rotation measures there are explained by the southern halo field alone.
In the interarm region between the Orion and Sagittarius arms, the halo field reaches down to the Galactic plane, where the direction reverses.
The estimated mean field strength in the Sagittarius arm is about 1.2–1.8 µG, based on the RM–DM slope.
The sign pattern seen in both pulsar and extragalactic-source RMs supports the two-component halo model with oppositely directed fields in the two Galactic hemispheres.

Reading between the lines

Editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

If the h = -300 pc boundary is real, it places a geometric constraint on dynamo models of the Galactic halo: the field reversal is not symmetric about the midplane in this arm direction, at least beyond 2 kpc from the Sun.
The same sign-mapping technique could be applied to other spiral arms, notably the Scutum-Crux arm where the paper notes a predominantly negative RM, to test whether each arm's field direction and vertical extent follow a common rule.
The apparent asymmetry in RM magnitudes between the northern and southern hemispheres suggests the southern halo field is either weaker, more tangled, or at a different distance; a dedicated survey with independent pulsar distance estimates could separate these possibilities.
The claim that the small RMs south of h = -300 pc are 'due solely' to the southern halo field is strong; future high-latitude RM data for background sources, combined with better electron-density models, could test whether other field components contribute there.

Share X Bluesky LinkedIn Reddit HN

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, and a circularity audit.

Desk Editor's Note

read the letter

For your radar: this is a short, old-school observational paper using public RM data (492 pulsars, 2700+ NVSS sources) to claim the Sagittarius arm lies north of h = -300 pc with its regular field pointing toward the Sun, and that south of that plane the small negative RMs come solely from the southern halo field. The sign maps (Figs. 2–3) are the real content, and the asymmetry above/below h = -300 pc is visually striking. That is a legitimate observation, and it is a genuine extension of the authors' earlier two-component model to a new region using newer catalogues. Credit where due: they use the globular-cluster RM dispersion to argue that pulsar-intrinsic RM is negligible, and they explicitly report that the RM-DM slope varies with cuts (A = 1.0–1.5). They do not hide that instability. The qualitative picture may well be right.

The soft spots are the ones the stress test names, and I think they land. First, RM is the integral of n_e B_parallel over the whole sightline, not a local label. A pulsar below h = -300 pc at d > 2 kpc spends most of its path north of that plane, so a negative RM cannot be attributed 'solely' to the southern halo field without a foreground model. That assertion in the Abstract and Sec. 6 is stronger than the data support. Second, the h coordinate comes from pulsar distances via an electron-density model that is never named or referenced. That makes the h = -300 pc boundary unreproducible. The distance model is load-bearing here: shifting distances by a few hundred pc reassigns pulsars across the boundary. Third, the quantitative result = 1.5 µG is just 1.23A from a linear fit, and the authors themselves say A varies. So the field-strength claim is not a measurement in any robust sense; it is a fitted value with selection dependence. Fourth, the interpretation leans on the authors' own two-component model, so the confirmation is partly circular. That is worth saying, but it is not disqualifying: the RM sign maps and the extragalactic-source latitude dependence (Table 1) are independent of the model, and the qualitative halo-reversal pattern is consistent with the Xu & Han toroid picture. I would not call the paper incoherent, and I disagree with any reading that treats the sign-map asymmetry as invented. The weakness is the interpretation step, not the data selection.

Who gets value from this: anyone working on Galactic-field models, pulsar RM catalogues, or synchrotron foregrounds. It is a short, testable hypothesis that could be sharpened with a stated distance model, a foreground subtraction, or a proper line-of-sight integration. I would rather see that as a revised paper than a desk-reject, but only with those additions. My bottom line: deserves a serious referee who can push for the missing model and a conservative rewrite of the 'solely' claim.

Referee Report

4 major / 6 minor

Summary. The paper analyzes Faraday rotation measures (RM) of pulsars and extragalactic radio sources in the Galactic longitude range 33° < l < 63° to infer the magnetic field structure in the Sagittarius spiral arm region. The authors propose that the Sagittarius arm lies north of the plane h = -300 pc (where h is the distance from the Galactic plane), that its regular magnetic field is directed toward the Sun, and that south of this plane the field is oppositely directed and due solely to the southern halo. The only quantitative estimate is <B_L> ≈ 1.5 µG, obtained from the slope of a linear RM-DM relation. The paper argues that the results confirm the two-component halo model previously proposed by the authors.

Significance. If established, the result would provide an observational constraint on the vertical structure of the Galactic magnetic field and its relation to spiral arms. The use of both pulsars and extragalactic sources is a strength, as is the relatively large sample. However, the central claims are not supported by the present analysis: RM is treated as a local field-direction indicator despite being a line-of-sight integral, the electron-density distance model is not specified, and the quantitative field estimate is a fitted slope with substantial scatter. The extragalactic RM sign pattern is suggestive but is also not quantitatively modeled. The paper is therefore more a set of interesting sign maps than a demonstrated field geometry.

major comments (4)

[Sec. 4, Figs. 2-3; Eq. (2)] The sign of RM is the line integral of n_e B_parallel along the entire path from the pulsar to the observer, not a local measurement of the field at the pulsar's (d,h) position. For a pulsar at d > 2 kpc and h < -300 pc, the sightline passes through h > -300 pc for most of its length, including the volume the paper assigns to the Sagittarius arm. Attributing the negative RM of such pulsars 'solely' to the southern halo field (Abstract, Sec. 6) is therefore unjustified without a quantitative foreground model or a distance-resolved RM gradient. The paper should model the RM integral for a three-dimensional field (disk, northern and southern halos, spiral arms) and demonstrate that the observed sign patterns cannot be produced without the proposed h = -300 pc reversal.
[Secs. 2-3] The height h is computed from pulsar distances, but the electron-density model used to convert dispersion measure to distance is never named. This makes the h = -300 pc geometry unreproducible. Distance uncertainties of a few hundred pc are comparable to the offset of the proposed boundary from the plane, so the sign separation in Figs. 2-3 may be sensitive to the distance model. The authors must specify the model (e.g., NE2001 or YMW16), report distance uncertainties, and show that the sign separation persists under distance perturbations.
[Sec. 4, Eq. (5), Fig. 4] The quantitative field estimate is the fitted slope A of the RM-DM relation, <B_L> = 1.23 A. The paper reports that A varies from 1.0 to 1.5 under different cuts, corresponding to <B_L> from 1.23 to 1.845 µG, so the central value is unstable. Moreover, the stated 'σ = 0.11' is not a physical uncertainty on the field strength; it is a scatter about a fit performed under one constraint. The RM-DM fit can be biased by distance-dependent selection and by the same line-of-sight mixing criticized above. A well-defined fitting procedure, all data cuts, and a realistic error budget are needed before this can be quoted as a measurement.
[Secs. 4 and 6; refs [8,11]] The interpretation is circular: the data are interpreted with the two-component halo model proposed earlier by the authors in [8,11], and the same model is then said to be confirmed. This does not provide an independent test. To break the circularity, the model should be fitted to the full RM dataset (pulsars and extragalactic sources) with free parameters and compared to alternatives (e.g., a disk-only field, a di-polar halo, or a model with no Sagittarius-arm field) using standard model-comparison statistics.

minor comments (6)

[Eq. (2)] The constant α is garbled and dimensionally inconsistent with the numerical value 1.23 in Eq. (5). Use the standard expression with α = 0.812 rad m^-2 cm^3 pc^-1 µG^-1 and state units explicitly.
[Sec. 3, reference [17]] The text cites 'Georgelin & Georgelin' for the location of the Sagittarius arm, but reference [17] is Sun et al. 2024. Please correct the citation or add the original Georgelin & Georgelin reference.
[Secs. 2-3, Abstract] The number of pulsars used is inconsistent: the Abstract says 492 pulsars, Sec. 2 says RMs are known for 1,990 pulsars, and Sec. 3 quotes 328 and 496 pulsars at the two RM thresholds. Please reconcile these counts throughout.
[Sec. 3] The longitude range '-560 < l < -260' should presumably be '-56° < l < -26°'; please clarify the notation.
[Fig. 5 and Table 1] The latitude bins in Table 1 are difficult to parse, and the row 'b -50÷50' appears twice. Define bin edges unambiguously, e.g., b in 5° increments from b = 5° to 55°.
[Sec. 2] Typos: 'in micro gasses (µG)' should be 'in microgauss'; 'sm-3' should be 'cm^-3'.

Circularity Check

2 steps flagged · score 6.0 of 10

The Sagittarius-arm field geometry is obtained by re-interpreting new RM sign maps through the authors' own two-component halo model [8,11], and the quoted field strength is the fitted RM-DM slope; both reduce to inputs rather than independent predictions.

self citation load bearing [Section 4, p.7 (interpretation of Figs. 2-3)]
"The distribution of pulsar rotation measures ... fits well with the two-component magnetic field model of the Galaxy proposed earlier in [8; 11] ... If this model is applied to the region studied in this paper ... then the following can be concluded. The Sagittarius spiral arm is located above of the line h = -300 pc."

The two-component model with opposite north/south halo directions is the authors' own prior model (refs [8,11]). The paper uses this model as the interpretive key for the new sign maps, and from it concludes the very geometry (arm north of h=-300, southern halo alone producing small negative RMs) that the model assumes. Without an independent derivation or falsification test, the 'confirmation' in Sec. 6 ('both of these results fit well into the model ... [11]') is a self-citation chain rather than an external constraint.
fitted input called prediction [Section 4, p.8 (RM-DM regression, Fig.4)]
"From formula 5, it follows that the average value of the magnetic induction component on line of sight can be calculated using the formula ‹B_L› = 1.23A, where A is the linear approximation parameter of the RM-DM relationship. In Figure 4, this parameter is A=1.216, yielding ‹B_L› = 1.5µG. For the various constraints mentioned, the value of parameter A varies within the range of 1.0-1.5."

The numerical field strength is not an independent prediction: by Eq. (5) it is exactly 1.23 times the fitted slope A of the selected RM-DM regression. The paper itself notes that the slope changes with the chosen cuts (A=1.0-1.5), so the quoted 1.5 µG (and its 'σ=0.11') reduces by construction to the fitted parameter and its selection, not to a first-principles result.

full rationale

The empirical sign maps in Figs. 1-3 and the external NVSS data in Fig. 5 are real observations, but the paper's central claim — that the Sagittarius arm lies north of h=-300 with a field toward the Sun and that the southern negative RMs come 'solely' from the opposite southern-halo field — is obtained by applying the authors' own two-component halo model [8,11] to those maps. This is a self-citation-load-bearing interpretation rather than an independent test. The only quantitative field estimate is the fitted RM-DM slope converted by Eq. (5), so it is a fit, not a prediction. No alternative model (e.g., turbulent/local foreground, different distance model) is tested, and the h=-300 boundary is read from the same data it is then used to interpret. These factors make the derivation partially circular; however, the data themselves are independent and the model is not a definitional identity, so a mid-range score of 6 is appropriate rather than 8-10.

Assumptions & free parameters 4 free parameters · 6 assumptions · 0 invented entities

The central geometric picture ('arm north of -300 pc, field toward the Sun; southern halo alone south of -300 pc') is not derived from a closed-form calculation. It depends on hand-chosen RM thresholds, a by-eye boundary, an unspecified distance/electron-density model, and a RM-DM fit with selection-dependent slope. The only invented entity is the h=-300 pc boundary itself, which is a data-driven construct rather than an independent physical scale.

free parameters (4)

RM selection thresholds |RM|>200 and |RM|>300 rad m^-2 = 200 and 300 rad m^-2
Chosen by hand to ensure that turbulent-field contributions (estimated as <200 rad/m2 in Section 2) do not flip RM signs; this selection determines which pulsars enter Figures 2 and 3.
Boundary plane h = -300 pc = -300 pc
Drawn by eye from the sign-transition in Figures 2-3; used as the cut separating the Sagittarius arm from the southern halo. No formal fit, uncertainty, or independent justification is given.
RM-DM linear slope A = 1.216 (range 1.0-1.5)
Linear-regression slope of RM versus DM for pulsars with RM>0, DM<450 (Figure 4). It sets <B_L> = 1.23 A = 1.5 µG, and the authors note that different constraints change A substantially.
Fit constraint DM<450 = 450 pc cm^-3
One of the 'acceptable constraints' used for the RM-DM fit in Figure 4; not derived from a physical criterion, and the paper states that different constraints yield significantly different slopes.

assumptions (6)

standard math Standard RM-DM relation <B_L> = 1.23 × RM/DM (Eq. 5)
Assumes a uniform electron density along the path and that all RM is produced by the large-scale field; used to convert the fitted slope into magnetic induction.
domain assumption Pulsar proper rotation measures (RM0) are negligible
Supported for four globular clusters (Section 2), then generalized to all pulsars; if RM0 is not negligible for some pulsars, the sign interpretation changes.
domain assumption Turbulent-field contribution to RM is <200 rad m^-2 for coherence length <100 pc, ne=1 cm^-3, B=2 µG
Used to justify using only pulsars with |RM|>200 rad/m2; the estimate is a rough upper bound from reference [14], not a measured bound for these specific sightlines.
domain assumption Positive RM implies B points toward the observer over the entire path; negative implies away
Requires ne>0 along the path and no cancellation; in multi-arm sightlines, exactly the cancellation the paper invokes for low latitudes could also affect high-latitude RM signs.
domain assumption An electron-density model converts DM to distance d and height h, but no model is cited
Figures 2-3 place pulsars in d-h space, so the geometric boundary h=-300 pc depends entirely on an unspecified electron-density model; this is a reproducibility and validity gap.
domain assumption The region 33 degrees < l < 63 degrees contains the main part of the Sagittarius spiral arm
Arm assignment is taken from the Georgelin & Georgelin map as reproduced in reference [17]; if the arm location is misidentified, the arm-specific conclusions do not follow.

how reviews work

0 comments

Cite this review

Pith. "Pith review of Distribution of the magnetic field relative to the plane of the Galaxy in the region of the Sagittarius spiral arm." pith.science (2026). https://pith.science/paper/WZF6Q6J5

@misc{pith2026260725587,
  author       = {Pith},
  title        = {Pith review of: Distribution of the magnetic field relative to the plane of the Galaxy in the region of the Sagittarius spiral arm},
  year         = {2026},
  howpublished = {\url{https://pith.science/paper/WZF6Q6J5}},
  note         = {Machine review of arXiv:2607.25587}
}

abstract

Faraday rotation data for 492 pulsars and more than 2,700 extragalactic radio sources were used to study the magnetic field, in detail, in the direction of Galactic longitude $33^o$ <l< $63^o$, which partially covers the Sagittarius spiral arm region. It was proposed that the Sagittarius spiral arm lies north of the h=-300 pc plane, where h is the distance from the Galactic plane. The (-) sign indicates that this plane is located in the southern hemisphere of the Galaxy. The magnetic field of the Sagittarius spiral arm is directed toward the Sun. This direction is close to the direction of the magnetic field of the northern hemisphere halo. The small absolute value of the rotation measures in the region south of the h=-300 pc plane is due solely to the contribution of the magnetic field of the southern hemisphere halo, which is directed opposite to the field of the northern hemisphere halo and the direction of the field in the Sagittarius arm. In the interarm region between the local Orion arm and the Sagittarius arm, the halo magnetic field extends to the Galactic plane, where a reversal of the magnetic fields of the halos of the northern and southern hemispheres occurs.

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

24 extracted references · 1 linked inside Pith

[1]

Byurakan Astrophysical Observatory randrasy@bao.sci.am hasmik.andreasyan@gmail.com andranik.suqiasyan.1995@mail.ru paronyan_gurgen@yahoo.com (corresponding author) Abstract. Faraday rotation data for 492 pulsars and more than 2,700 extragalactic radio sources were used to study the magnetic field, in detail, in the direction of Galactic longitude 330 < l ...

1995
[2]

Studying the magnetic field of our galaxy, as well as other galaxies, is very important for understanding all the active processes occurring in galaxies

Introduction: The magnetic field of our Galaxy was discovered in 1949 [1] using observational data on the interstellar polarization of starlight. Studying the magnetic field of our galaxy, as well as other galaxies, is very important for understanding all the active processes occurring in galaxies. For example, the motion of cosmic rays in the Galaxy is e...

1949
[3]

The ATNF pulsar catalogue 2025 contains various data for approximately 4,000 pulsars

Data used: For the study, we use data from the ATNF pulsar catalogue 2025, as well as Faraday rotation data for 37,543 extragalactic radio sources from [13]. The ATNF pulsar catalogue 2025 contains various data for approximately 4,000 pulsars. In this catalogue, Faraday rotation measures are known for 1,990 pulsars. The data for these pulsars, as well as ...

2025
[4]

This makes it possible to identify clearly distinguishable regions of large-scale

The Galactic distribution of large absolute RM values of pulsars: We used data from pulsars with large rotation measures to study the distribution of RM signs in the Galaxy magnetic fields. This makes it possible to identify clearly distinguishable regions of large-scale. It was constructed the distribution of rotation-measure signs of pulsars in the plan...
[5]

The coordinates are d and h, as in the fig.2, but on this picture the mark RM200 indicates that 100 rad/m2 <│RM│<200rad/m2, and the mark RM100 indicates that 0 <│RM│<100rad/m2

The Galactic distribution of pulsars with │RM│< 200rad/m2: To study the distribution of pulsars with rotation measures |RM| < 200rad / m2 located in the region (330 < l < 630), we construct figure 3. The coordinates are d and h, as in the fig.2, but on this picture the mark RM200 indicates that 100 rad/m2 <│RM│<200rad/m2, and the mark RM100 indicates that...

2024
[6]

The resulting catalogue of RM values covers the sky area north of declination −400

The Galactic distribution of signs of RMs of extragalactic radio sources: In [13], the NRAO VLA Sky Survey (NVSS) data were reanalyzed to derive rotation measures (RMs) toward 37,543 polarized radio sources. The resulting catalogue of RM values covers the sky area north of declination −400. We use the RM data from this catalogue to study the distribution ...
[7]

Conclusions. Faraday rotation data on 492 pulsars and more than 2700 extragalactic radio sources were used in a detailed study of the magnetic field in the direction of galactic longitude 330 <l< 630, which includes the Sagittarius spiral arm region. The magnetic field in the region north of the plane h = -300 pc is well ordered and directed toward the su...
[8]

Hiltner, Science 109, 166 (1949)

W.A. Hiltner, Science 109, 166 (1949)

1949

Show all 24 references

[9]

Rev., 75, 1169

Fermi, E., 1949, Phis. Rev., 75, 1169

1949
[10]

O., 1950, Phis

Kiepenheuer, K. O., 1950, Phis. Rev., 79, 738

1950
[11]

R. M. Crutcher, ARA&A 50, 29 (2012)

2012
[12]

C. L. Bennett, D. Larson, J. L. Weiland, N. Jarosik, G. Hinshaw, N. Odegard, K. M. Smith, R. S. Hill, B. Gold, M. Halpern, E. Komatsu, M. R. Nolta, L. Page, D. N. Spergel, E. Wollack, J. Dunkley, A. Kogut, M. Limon, S. S. Meyer, G. S. Tucker, and E. L. Wright, ApJS 208, 20 (20...

2013 arXiv
[13]

R. M. Crutcher, B. Wandelt, C. Heiles, E. Falgarone, and T. H. Troland, ApJ 725, 466 (2010)

2010
[14]

Simard-Normandin and P

M. Simard-Normandin and P. P. Kronberg, ApJ 242, 74 (1980)

1980
[15]

R.; Makarov, A

Andreasyan, R. R.; Makarov, A. N., 1988, Afz, 28, 419

1988
[16]

Jun Xu, J. L. Han, Weicong Jing, 2025,OJAp, 854248. arXiv:2512.16159

2025
[17]

N., 1974

Manchester, R. N., 1974. ApJ, 188, 637

1974
[18]

R.; Makarov, A

Andreasyan, R. R.; Makarov, A. N., 1989, Ap, Vol.30, P. 101

1989
[19]

L., 2024, ApJ, 966, 240

Xu, J.; Han, J. L., 2024, ApJ, 966, 240

2024
[20]

R.; Stil, J

Taylor, A. R.; Stil, J. M. and Sunstrum, C., 2009, ApJ, 702:1230–1236

2009
[21]

R. J. Rand and S. R. Kulkarni, ApJ, 343, 760 (1989)

1989
[22]

Andreasyan, R.R.; Paronyan, G.M.; Sukiasyan, A.G.,2022, ComBAO, 69, 265

2022
[23]

R.; Mikhailov, E

Andreasyan, R. R.; Mikhailov, E. A.; Andreasyan, H. R, 2020, ARep.; Volume 64, Issue 3, p.189-198

2020
[24]

Sun, Yan ; Yang, Ji; Zhang, Shaobo et all.; 2024; The ApJ Letters, Volume 977, Issue 2, id.L35, 8 pp

2024

Pith tools

Reviewed August 1, 2026 · model on record in the stance chip above.

[1] [1]

Byurakan Astrophysical Observatory randrasy@bao.sci.am hasmik.andreasyan@gmail.com andranik.suqiasyan.1995@mail.ru paronyan_gurgen@yahoo.com (corresponding author) Abstract. Faraday rotation data for 492 pulsars and more than 2,700 extragalactic radio sources were used to study the magnetic field, in detail, in the direction of Galactic longitude 330 < l ...

1995

[2] [2]

Studying the magnetic field of our galaxy, as well as other galaxies, is very important for understanding all the active processes occurring in galaxies

Introduction: The magnetic field of our Galaxy was discovered in 1949 [1] using observational data on the interstellar polarization of starlight. Studying the magnetic field of our galaxy, as well as other galaxies, is very important for understanding all the active processes occurring in galaxies. For example, the motion of cosmic rays in the Galaxy is e...

1949

[3] [3]

The ATNF pulsar catalogue 2025 contains various data for approximately 4,000 pulsars

Data used: For the study, we use data from the ATNF pulsar catalogue 2025, as well as Faraday rotation data for 37,543 extragalactic radio sources from [13]. The ATNF pulsar catalogue 2025 contains various data for approximately 4,000 pulsars. In this catalogue, Faraday rotation measures are known for 1,990 pulsars. The data for these pulsars, as well as ...

2025

[4] [4]

This makes it possible to identify clearly distinguishable regions of large-scale

The Galactic distribution of large absolute RM values of pulsars: We used data from pulsars with large rotation measures to study the distribution of RM signs in the Galaxy magnetic fields. This makes it possible to identify clearly distinguishable regions of large-scale. It was constructed the distribution of rotation-measure signs of pulsars in the plan...

[5] [5]

The coordinates are d and h, as in the fig.2, but on this picture the mark RM200 indicates that 100 rad/m2 <│RM│<200rad/m2, and the mark RM100 indicates that 0 <│RM│<100rad/m2

The Galactic distribution of pulsars with │RM│< 200rad/m2: To study the distribution of pulsars with rotation measures |RM| < 200rad / m2 located in the region (330 < l < 630), we construct figure 3. The coordinates are d and h, as in the fig.2, but on this picture the mark RM200 indicates that 100 rad/m2 <│RM│<200rad/m2, and the mark RM100 indicates that...

2024

[6] [6]

The resulting catalogue of RM values covers the sky area north of declination −400

The Galactic distribution of signs of RMs of extragalactic radio sources: In [13], the NRAO VLA Sky Survey (NVSS) data were reanalyzed to derive rotation measures (RMs) toward 37,543 polarized radio sources. The resulting catalogue of RM values covers the sky area north of declination −400. We use the RM data from this catalogue to study the distribution ...

[7] [7]

Conclusions. Faraday rotation data on 492 pulsars and more than 2700 extragalactic radio sources were used in a detailed study of the magnetic field in the direction of galactic longitude 330 <l< 630, which includes the Sagittarius spiral arm region. The magnetic field in the region north of the plane h = -300 pc is well ordered and directed toward the su...

[8] [8]

Hiltner, Science 109, 166 (1949)

W.A. Hiltner, Science 109, 166 (1949)

1949