Pith. sign in

REVIEW 3 major objections 5 minor 120 references

Augmenting the availability of historical GDP per capita estimates through machine learning

T0 review · 3 major / 5 minor · reviewed 2026-08-15 · deepseek-v4-flash

Challenge this review Re-run · record.json Download PDF Read on arXiv ↗ Review JSON

Pith's one-line read Biographical records of famous historical figures contain enough economic signal to estimate GDP per capita for previously unmeasured countries and regions over the past 700 years, with out-of-sample accuracy of 90.1 percent.

desk verdict Useful dataset and honest modeling, but the biographical signal adds modestly over persistence and the transfer to poorly documented locations is the open question. read the letter →

arxiv 2505.09399 v1 pith:X2NFDD3M submitted 2025-05-14 econ.GN q-fin.EC

Philipp Koch , Viktor Stojkoski , César A. Hidalgo This is my paper · ORCID
classification econ.GNq-fin.EC
keywords economichistoryGDPpercapitaestimationmachinelearningelasticnetregressionbiographicaldataLittleDivergencehistoricaldevelopment
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal

The pith

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The reading

This paper tries to establish that the geography of famous historical lives—where people were born, died, and worked—contains enough information about local prosperity that a machine learning model can estimate GDP per capita for European and North American countries and regions over the past 700 years, including times and places with no existing income data. Trained on 1,336 known historical GDP observations and biographical features for more than half a million individuals, the elastic net model explains $R^2=90.1\%$ of the variance in out-of-sample income levels and misses by $22.6\%$ of observed GDP per capita on average. The authors argue the estimates are trustworthy because they correlate with four independent proxies of economic development—urbanization, body height, well-being, and church building activity—and because they reproduce the Little Divergence, the faster growth of northwestern Europe relative to southern Europe after 1300. If this holds, the method more than quadruples the available historical income data for the studied regions and turns biographical records into a quantitative source for long-run economic history.

What carries the argument

The machinery is a supervised feature-construction pipeline followed by elastic net regression. From a database of 562,962 biographies, each country and region receives, for every 50-year period, popularity-weighted counts of famous people born, died, immigrated, and emigrated, split into occupation categories; these counts are log-linearized and supplemented by the first five singular value decomposition factors for each of the four mobility types, economic complexity indices for each type, occupational diversity, and average ubiquity. The elastic net penalty ($\ell^1$ plus $\ell^2$ regularization) performs feature selection separately for five historical periods, and the previous period's GDP per capita enters as a persistence feature. The load-bearing mechanism is the correlation between where historically recorded individuals concentrate and local prosperity; the paper is explicit that this channel may be direct or indirect and does not need a causal identification.

What would settle it

Apply the model to a held-out set of regions for which new archival GDP estimates become available after the paper's training cutoff; if the full model's errors on those regions are no better than the persistence-plus-region baseline, or if it systematically overestimates the poorest regions, then the claim that biographical density generalizes to unlabeled locations would be undercut.

Watch

Extended reading notes

Core claim

The central claim is that fine-grained biographical data can serve as a legitimate proxy signal for historical income in Europe and North America between 1300 and 2000. The paper builds an elastic net regression for five historical periods, using roughly 250 to 300 candidate features per period: popularity-weighted counts of births, deaths, immigrants, and emigrants broken down by occupation, plus singular value decomposition factors, economic complexity indices, occupational diversity, and the previous period's GDP per capita. In a validation scheme that withholds all observations for a random $20\%$ of countries, the full model reaches $R^2=90.1\%$ and a mean absolute error of $22.6\%$ of observed GDP per capita, improving on a baseline that only uses persistence and supranational-region fixed effects (median $R^2$ rises from $86.2\%$ to $90.1\%$). The paper treats the correlation between biographical presence and wealth as sufficient, without requiring a causal direction: wealth may attract talent, talent may create wealth, or wealth may make talent historically visible. It validates the extrapolated estimates by reproducing the Little Divergence, showing that Atlantic-port regions drive much of it, and by finding similar correlations with urbanization, body height, well-being, and church construction for both data-covered and uncovered locations.

Load-bearing premise

The load-bearing premise is that the link between how many historically recorded famous people are associated with a place and that place's income is the same in places without existing GDP data as in places with it, even though the data-covered places are richer and better documented on average.

Editorial extensions

If this is right

  • The released dataset holds 4,364 out-of-sample GDP per capita estimates with confidence intervals, roughly quadrupling the number of location-year observations for Europe and North America between 1300 and 2000.
  • The estimates support within-country comparisons that were previously unavailable, such as Nuremberg versus other German regions in 1500, Amsterdam versus Rotterdam in 1600, and San Jose and Los Angeles versus Inner London in 1900.
  • Because the estimates reproduce the Little Divergence and tie much of it to regions with Atlantic ports, they strengthen the evidential base for accounts in which Atlantic trade and associated institutional change drove early modern European growth.
  • Correlations with body height, well-being, urbanization, and church building activity give independent, non-GDP evidence that the predicted income levels track material living standards rather than merely recording where famous people lived.
  • The bootstrapped confidence intervals make the new estimates usable in downstream quantitative history even though they are extrapolations.

Reading between the lines

Editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • A natural extension would be to test the same pipeline in world regions beyond Europe and North America once biographical coverage is denser; the paper explicitly avoids this extrapolation, so success there is not established.
  • The finding that growth rates, unlike levels, could not be predicted better than the baseline suggests that biographical density tracks income levels more than income changes; future work with longer panels or better features might revisit this boundary.
  • The similar correlations between estimates and proxies for data-covered and uncovered locations offer a template for detecting selection bias in predictive historical reconstruction; an explicit reweighting or selection-correction step could turn that diagnostic into a fix.
Share X Bluesky LinkedIn Reddit HN

Signed reviews

No signed human review yet.

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, and a circularity audit.

Referee Report

3 major / 5 minor

Summary. The paper introduces a machine learning method, elastic net regression, that uses features derived from the biographies of 562,962 historical figures (births, deaths, occupations, popularity-weighted counts, SVD factors, economic complexity measures) to estimate historical GDP per capita for countries and regions in Europe and North America between 1300 and 2000. Training data consist of 1,336 known GDP per capita observations from the Maddison project and other regional sources; the model produces 4,364 out-of-sample estimates. The authors report out-of-sample R-squared of 90.1% versus 86.2% for a baseline model that uses lagged GDP and supranational region fixed effects, with mean absolute error improving from 29% to 22.6% of GDP per capita. They validate the estimates by reproducing the Little Divergence between northwestern and southern Europe, linking it to Atlantic trade, and by showing correlations with urbanization, body height, wellbeing, and church building activity. The paper also provides feature importance via Shapley values, robustness checks, and a public dataset and code repository.

Significance. If the estimates are reliable, this work materially expands the availability of historical GDP per capita data, especially at the regional level, and demonstrates a novel use of structured biographical data for economic history. The paper is commendable for shipping the full dataset, confidence intervals, and reproducible code, and for reporting out-of-sample performance against a nontrivial baseline. The external validations against multiple independent proxies and the replication of the Little Divergence are valuable and go beyond simple in-sample fit. However, the central claim depends on the stability of the biography-to-GDP mapping when applied to locations that are systematically poorer and less documented than the labeled training locations; the current evidence for this stability is correlational and indirect. The recursive use of model-generated lagged GDP as a feature also introduces a circularity risk that is not directly addressed. These issues do not invalidate the contribution but they need substantial additional analysis before the estimates can be taken at face value.

major comments (3)
  1. [Discussion, "countries and regions for which source data is available are not perfectly representative..."] The paper acknowledges that labeled locations have higher GDP per capita and more famous individuals than unlabeled locations, but the external validation in Fig. 3E-H and SI 5.3 only shows that correlations with proxies are similar for labeled and unlabeled observations. Correlation similarity does not establish that the learned slope and intercept are correct for poorly documented locations: an unlabeled rich region will simultaneously have high biography counts, high proxy values, and high predicted GDP, producing correlation without testing calibration at the low end. I request a direct calibration test, for example comparing predicted versus actual GDP in held-out low-GDP locations (or in the lower decile of the predicted distribution) and reporting bias and coverage of the confidence intervals there.
  2. [Materials and Methods, Elastic Net and Model performance] The lagged GDP per capita feature is a candidate predictor, and when source data are missing it is filled with the EN model's own estimates from the previous period (and similarly for the baseline model). This makes predictions for unlabeled location-periods recursively dependent on earlier model outputs, so the reported 90.1% R-squared partly reflects internal consistency of the imputation chain rather than independent information from biographies. The paper should report an ablation that excludes the lagged GDP feature entirely, and a variant that uses only source-data lags (without model-imputed lags), to quantify the marginal contribution of biographical features in the absence of recursive imputation.
  3. [Results, Model performance, Fig. 2C-D] The full model improves on the baseline by only about 4 percentage points in R-squared (86.2% to 90.1% at the median), and the paper itself reports in SI 5.5.8 that the method does not significantly improve growth-rate prediction. Given that the baseline already captures persistence and regional fixed effects, the incremental signal from biographical features is modest. The paper should clearly state the incremental contribution of the biography-derived features relative to lagged GDP and region dummies alone, and discuss whether the reported 22.6% MAE is economically meaningful for historical inference (e.g., by comparing it to the known uncertainty of Maddison estimates).
minor comments (5)
  1. [Robustness of our estimates, sixth item] There is a typo: "the use us of HPI" should read "the use of HPI."
  2. [Materials and Methods, Shapley values] The Shapley value equation contains a bracket typo: in the denominator, "|F]!" should be "|F|!".
  3. [Data, Data on historical figures] The text says "In a recent publication (37), we tested this proxy by randomly sampling 200 individuals," but reference 37 is listed as J. Mokyr, "Mobility, Creativity, and Technological Development," which does not appear to be the authors' own work. Please correct the citation to the authors' relevant paper (or clarify that the validation was done in this manuscript).
  4. [Model performance] The text reports R-squared for the log of GDP per capita but MAE for exponentiated estimates; this distinction should be stated in the main text, not only in the Methods, to avoid confusion when interpreting the 90.1% and 22.6% figures.
  5. [Introduction, paragraph 1] The claim "more than quadrupling the availability of historical economic output data" is supported by the ratio of 5,700 total observations to 1,336 source observations, but the wording could be made precise by stating that the number of location-year observations increases from 1,336 to 5,700.

Circularity Check

1 steps flagged · score 4.0 of 10

Recursive use of the model's own lagged estimates makes some 'out-of-sample' predictions self-feeding, but the biography signal is benchmarked independently.

  1. fitted input called prediction [Materials and Methods, Elastic Net; Results, Constructing the model]
    "If that is not available, we use the estimates of the EN model in the previous historical period. For regions with unavailable source data or EN model estimates for the previous period, we use instead the data or model estimates of the country that region is in."

    The full model includes the GDP per capita from the end of the previous historical period as a candidate feature. For the 4,364 location-year combinations labeled 'out-of-sample estimates,' whenever the previous-period source value is missing, that feature is filled with the model's own earlier prediction. Thus the output for period t is partly a recursive transformation of the model's own output for period t-1, initialized by regional averages. The published unobserved GDP series is therefore not an independent feature-based prediction for each cell; a model-generated value is recycled as an input for the next period.

full rationale

The derivation is not globally circular: the central benchmark is an honest out-of-sample comparison against a baseline that already contains region-period fixed effects and lagged GDP, and the biography features improve the median R2 from 86.2% to 90.1%. The main circularity concern is localized to the construction of the lagged-GDP feature: both the baseline and full models impute missing lags from the model's own earlier estimates, so a substantial share of the 4,364 published estimates are functions of previous model outputs rather than solely of observed source data. This does not by construction force the central result, because the biography features still add predictive power beyond the baseline and the external proxy checks (urbanization, height, wellbeing, church building) are independent of the training labels. I also flag a citation-support issue: the sentence 'In a recent publication (37), we tested this proxy...' cites reference [37] (Mokyr 2005), which does not contain such a test; if the intended reference is the authors' own prior paper, the core birth/death-location proxy rests on a self-citation, though this is not the main source of circularity. Overall, the central claim retains independent grounding, but the recursive lag imputation introduces a genuine self-referential component in the out-of-sample estimates.

Assumptions & free parameters 5 free parameters · 5 assumptions · 0 invented entities

The central claim rests on the reliability of historical GDP estimates as ground truth, a stable correlation between biography density and income, the validity of birth and death places as life-history proxies, and the generalizability of the learned mapping to less-documented locations. The model also depends on a hierarchical imputation of lagged GDP that feeds the model's own estimates back into future predictions. No new physical or theoretical entities are introduced.

free parameters (5)
  • Birth window length = 150 years
    Features for each target year include individuals born in the preceding 150 years; the authors report that 75, 100, and 175-year windows give similar but slightly worse results (SI 5.5.3).
  • Minimum biography thresholds = 3 births/deaths up to 1600, 5 between 1650 and 1950, 10 in 2000
    Ad hoc exclusion rule to avoid noisy left-tail predictions; it determines which locations receive out-of-sample estimates.
  • Elastic net hyperparameters alpha and lambda = Tuned per five historical periods via 10-fold cross-validation, values in SI 5.1
    Regularization parameters are fitted to the source data, not derived from theory.
  • Number of SVD factors = 5 per matrix, 20 total
    Arbitrary cutoff for dimensionality-reduction features; no theory-based justification is given.
  • Regional rescaling to country means = n/a, procedure uses births and deaths as population proxies
    Regional predictions are adjusted to match population-weighted country means, so regional variation is constrained by country-level estimates.
assumptions (5)
  • domain assumption Maddison project GDP per capita estimates are treated as gold-standard ground truth despite known methodological debates.
    Data section acknowledges critiques (refs 73-75) but uses Maddison for coverage; all R2 values are against these estimates, not actual GDP.
  • domain assumption The presence and recorded fame of historical figures is positively correlated with GDP per capita through direct and indirect channels.
    Introduction states the method does not require identifying the causal channel, only a stable correlation mineable from biographical records.
  • domain assumption Places of birth and death are a sufficient proxy for where historical figures lived and contributed economically.
    Data section cites prior validation of 90% of 200 sampled biographies from the authors' earlier work; intermediate residences are ignored.
  • domain assumption Remaining Wikipedia coverage and language biases do not drive estimates after restricting to Europe and North America and to biographies in at least two languages.
    Authors provide robustness checks comparing English, non-English, and multi-language samples (SI 5.5.2), but the assumption remains untested for unobserved regions.
  • domain assumption Lagged GDP per capita can be imputed hierarchically from source data, model estimates, country values, or regional averages without introducing feedback that dominates predictions.
    Materials and Methods: previous-period GDP is a candidate feature and is filled from the model's own earlier estimates when unavailable, making predictions recursively dependent on the model.

how reviews work

0 comments
Cite this review

Pith. "Pith review of Augmenting the availability of historical GDP per capita estimates through machine learning." pith.science (2026). https://pith.science/paper/X2NFDD3M

@misc{pith2026250509399,
  author       = {Pith},
  title        = {Pith review of: Augmenting the availability of historical GDP per capita estimates through machine learning},
  year         = {2026},
  howpublished = {\url{https://pith.science/paper/X2NFDD3M}},
  note         = {Machine review of arXiv:2505.09399}
}
read the original abstract

Can we use data on the biographies of historical figures to estimate the GDP per capita of countries and regions? Here we introduce a machine learning method to estimate the GDP per capita of dozens of countries and hundreds of regions in Europe and North America for the past 700 years starting from data on the places of birth, death, and occupations of hundreds of thousands of historical figures. We build an elastic net regression model to perform feature selection and generate out-of-sample estimates that explain 90% of the variance in known historical income levels. We use this model to generate GDP per capita estimates for countries, regions, and time periods for which this data is not available and externally validate our estimates by comparing them with four proxies of economic output: urbanization rates in the past 500 years, body height in the 18th century, wellbeing in 1850, and church building activity in the 14th and 15th century. Additionally, we show our estimates reproduce the well-known reversal of fortune between southwestern and northwestern Europe between 1300 and 1800 and find this is largely driven by countries and regions engaged in Atlantic trade. These findings validate the use of fine-grained biographical data as a method to produce historical GDP per capita estimates. We publish our estimates with confidence intervals together with all collected source data in a comprehensive dataset.

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

120 extracted references · 78 canonical work pages

  1. [1]

    The Impact of Machine Learning on Economics

    S. Athey, “The Impact of Machine Learning on Economics” in The Economics of Artificial Intelligence: An Agenda, National Bureau of Economic Research conference report., A. Agrawal, J. Gans, A. Goldfarb, National Bureau of Economic Research, Eds. (The University of Chicago Press, 2019), pp. 507–547

    2019

  2. [2]

    Athey, G

    S. Athey, G. W. Imbens, Machine Learning Methods That Economists Should Know About. Annu. Rev. Econ. 11, 685–725 (2019)

    2019

  3. [3]

    Jean, et al., Combining satellite imagery and machine learning to predict poverty

    N. Jean, et al., Combining satellite imagery and machine learning to predict poverty. Science 353, 790–794 (2016)

    2016

  4. [4]

    Ahn, et al., A human-machine collaborative approach measures economic development using satellite imagery

    D. Ahn, et al., A human-machine collaborative approach measures economic development using satellite imagery. Nat. Commun. 14, 6811 (2023)

    2023

  5. [5]

    G. Chi, H. Fang, S. Chatterjee, J. E. Blumenstock, Microestimates of wealth for all low - and middle-income countries. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. 119, e2113658119 (2022)

    2022

  6. [6]

    J. V. Henderson, A. Storeygard, D. N. Weil, Measuring Economic Growth from Outer Space. Am. Econ. Rev. 102, 994–1028 (2012)

    2012

  7. [7]

    Robinson, F

    C. Robinson, F. Hohman, B. Dilkina, A Deep Learning Approach for Population Estimation from Satellite Imagery in Proceedings of the 1st ACM SIGSPATIAL Workshop on Geospatial Humanities, (ACM, 2017), pp. 47–54

    2017

  8. [8]

    F. R. Stevens, A. E. Gaughan, C. Linard, A. J. Tatem, Disaggregating Census Data for Population Mapping Using Random Forests with Remotely-Sensed and Ancillary Data. PLOS ONE 10, e0107042 (2015)

    2015

Show all 120 references
  1. [9]

    M. C. Hansen, et al., High-Resolution Global Maps of 21st-Century Forest Cover Change. Science 342, 850–853 (2013)

    2013

  2. [10]

    Rolf, et al., A generalizable and accessible approach to machine learning with global satellite imagery

    E. Rolf, et al., A generalizable and accessible approach to machine learning with global satellite imagery. Nat. Commun. 12, 4392 (2021)

    2021

  3. [11]

    Burke, A

    M. Burke, A. Driscoll, D. B. Lobell, S. Ermon, Using satellite imagery to understand and promote sustainable development. Science 371, eabe8628 (2021)

    2021

  4. [12]

    Yu, et al., Meta-discoveries from a synthesis of satellite-based land-cover mapping 18 research

    L. Yu, et al., Meta-discoveries from a synthesis of satellite-based land-cover mapping 18 research. Int. J. Remote Sens. 35, 4573–4588 (2014)

    2014

  5. [13]

    C. A. Hidalgo, B. Klinger, A.-L. Barabási, R. Hausmann, The product space conditions the development of nations. Science 317, 482–487 (2007)

    2007

  6. [14]

    F. L. Pinheiro, D. Hartmann, R. Boschma, C. A. Hidalgo, The time and frequency of unrelated diversification. Res. Policy 104323 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.respol.2021.104323

    2021

  7. [15]

    Poncet, F

    S. Poncet, F. S. de Waldemar, Product Relatedness and Firm Exports in China. World Bank Econ. Rev. 29, 579–605 (2015)

    2015

  8. [16]

    C. A. Hidalgo, Economic complexity theory and applications. Nat. Rev. Phys. 3, 92–113 (2021)

    2021

  9. [17]

    J. L. van Zanden, B. van Leeuwen, Persistent but not consistent: The growth of national income in Holland 1347–1807. Explor. Econ. Hist. 49, 119–130 (2012)

    2012

  10. [18]

    S. N. Broadberry, B. M. S. Campbell, A. Klein, M. Overton, B. van Leeuwen, British economic growth, 1270-1870 (Cambridge University Press, 2015)

    2015

  11. [19]

    Palma, J

    N. Palma, J. Reis, From Convergence to Divergence: Portuguese Economic Growth, 1527 –

  12. [20]

    Malanima, The long decline of a leading economy: GDP in central and northern Italy, 1300-1913

    P. Malanima, The long decline of a leading economy: GDP in central and northern Italy, 1300-1913. Eur. Rev. Econ. Hist. 15, 169–219 (2011)

    2011

  13. [21]

    Pfister, Economic Growth in Germany, 1500–1850

    U. Pfister, Economic Growth in Germany, 1500–1850. J. Econ. Hist. 82, 1071–1107 (2022)

    2022

  14. [22]

    Malinowski, J

    M. Malinowski, J. L. van Zanden, Income and its distribution in preindustrial Poland. Cliometrica 11, 375–404 (2017)

    2017

  15. [23]

    Álvarez-Nogal, L

    C. Álvarez-Nogal, L. P. De La Escosura, The rise and fall of Spain (1270-1850). Econ. Hist. Rev. 66, 1–37 (2013)

    2013

  16. [24]

    Krantz, Swedish GDP 1300-1560 : A Tentative Estimate

    O. Krantz, Swedish GDP 1300-1560 : A Tentative Estimate. Lund Pap. Econ. Hist. Gen. Issues 152 (2017)

    2017

  17. [25]

    Ridolfi, Six Centuries of Real Wages in France from Louis IX to Napoleon III: 1250 –1860

    L. Ridolfi, Six Centuries of Real Wages in France from Louis IX to Napoleon III: 1250 –1860. J. Econ. Hist. 79, 589–627 (2019)

    2019

  18. [26]

    Schön, O

    L. Schön, O. Krantz, New Swedish Historical National Accounts since the 16th Century in Constant and Current Prices. Lund Pap. Econ. Hist. Gen. Issues 140 (2015)

    2015

  19. [27]

    J. Bolt, J. L. van Zanden, Maddison style estimates of the evolution of the world economy. A new 2020 update. Maddison-Proj. Work. Pap. WP-15 (2020)

    2020

  20. [28]

    J. Bolt, J. L. van Zanden, The Maddison Project: collaborative research on historical national accounts: The Maddison Project. Econ. Hist. Rev. 67, 627–651 (2014)

    2014

  21. [29]

    Alvarez-Nogal, L

    C. Alvarez-Nogal, L. P. De La Escosura, The decline of Spain (1500-1850): conjectural estimates. Eur. Rev. Econ. Hist. 11, 319–366 (2007)

    2007

  22. [30]

    Enflo, A

    K. Enflo, A. Missiaia, Regional GDP estimates for Sweden, 1571–1850. Hist. Methods J. Quant. Interdiscip. Hist. 51, 115–137 (2018)

    2018

  23. [31]

    Laouenan, et al., A cross-verified database of notable people, 3500BC-2018AD

    M. Laouenan, et al., A cross-verified database of notable people, 3500BC-2018AD. Sci. Data 9, 290 (2022)

    2022

  24. [32]

    A. Z. Yu, S. Ronen, K. Hu, T. Lu, C. A. Hidalgo, Pantheon 1.0, a manually verified dataset of globally famous biographies. Sci. Data 3, 150075 (2016)

    2016

  25. [33]

    Long-Term Economic Growth and the History of Technology

    J. Mokyr, “Long-Term Economic Growth and the History of Technology” in Handbook of Economic Growth, (Elsevier, 2005), pp. 1113–1180

    2005

  26. [34]

    Akcigit, J

    U. Akcigit, J. Grigsby, T. Nicholas, The rise of Amercian ingenuity: Innovation and inventors of the Golden Age. NBER Work. Pap. 23047 (2017)

    2017

  27. [35]

    MacLaurin, P

    C. MacLaurin, P. Murdoch, An account of Sir Isaac Newton’s philosophical discoveries: in four book, 2nd Ed. (Printed for A. Millar, 1750)

  28. [36]

    Schich, et al., A network framework of cultural history

    M. Schich, et al., A network framework of cultural history. Science 345, 558–562 (2014)

    2014

  29. [37]

    Creativity and the Economy

    J. Mokyr, Mobility, Creativity, and Technological Development: David Hume, Immanuel Kant and the Economic Development of Europe in Session on “Creativity and the Economy”, German Association of Philosophy, (2005)

    2005

  30. [38]

    O’Hagan, K

    J. O’Hagan, K. J. Borowiecki, Birth Location, Migration, and Clustering of Important Composers: Historical Patterns. Hist. Methods J. Quant. Interdiscip. Hist. 43, 81–90 (2010)

    2010

  31. [39]

    P. Koch, V. Stojkoski, C. A. Hidalgo, The Role of Immigrants, Emigrants, and Locals in the 19 Historical Formation of European Knowledge Agglomerations. Reg. Stud. 1–15 (2023). https://doi.org/10.1080/00343404.2023.2275571

    2023

  32. [40]

    C. M. Cipolla, The Diffusion of Innovations in Early Modern Europe. Comp. Stud. Soc. Hist. 14, 46–52 (1972)

    1972

  33. [41]

    Miguelez, A

    E. Miguelez, A. Morrison, Migrant Inventors as Agents of Technological Change. J. Technol. Transf. (2022). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10961-022-09927-z

    2022 doi

  34. [42]

    Bahar, P

    D. Bahar, P. Choudhury, H. Rapoport, Migrant inventors and the technological advantage of nations. Res. Policy 49, 103947 (2020)

    2020

  35. [43]

    Bernstein, R

    S. Bernstein, R. Diamond, A. Jiranaphawiboon, T. McQuade, B. Pousada, The Contribution of High-Skilled Immigrants to Innovation in the United States. NBER Work. Pap. Ser. w30797 (2022). https://doi.org/10.3386/w30797

    2022 doi

  36. [44]

    Hornung, Immigration and the Diffusion of Technology: The Huguenot Diaspora in Prussia

    E. Hornung, Immigration and the Diffusion of Technology: The Huguenot Diaspora in Prussia. Am. Econ. Rev. 104, 84–122 (2014)

    2014

  37. [45]

    Ganguli, Immigration and Ideas: What Did Russian Scientists “Bring” to the United States? J

    I. Ganguli, Immigration and Ideas: What Did Russian Scientists “Bring” to the United States? J. Labor Econ. 33, S257–S288 (2015)

    2015

  38. [46]

    Diodato, A

    D. Diodato, A. Morrison, S. Petralia, Migration and invention in the Age of Mass Migration. J. Econ. Geogr. 22, 477–498 (2022)

    2022

  39. [47]

    K. J. Borowiecki, K. Graddy, Immigrant artists: Enrichment or displacement? J. Econ. Behav. Organ. 191, 785–797 (2021)

    2021

  40. [48]

    K. J. Borowiecki, Are composers different? Historical evidence on conflict-induced migration (1816-1997). Eur. Rev. Econ. Hist. 16, 270–291 (2012)

    2012

  41. [49]

    Acemoglu, S

    D. Acemoglu, S. Johnson, J. Robinson, The Rise of Europe: Atlantic Trade, Institutional Change, and Economic Growth. Am. Econ. Rev. 95, 546–579 (2005)

    2005

  42. [50]

    Little Divergence

    A. M. de Pleijt, J. L. van Zanden, Accounting for the “Little Divergence”: What drove economic growth in pre-industrial Europe, 1300–1800? Eur. Rev. Econ. Hist. 20, 387–409 (2016)

    2016

  43. [51]

    Henriques, N

    A. Henriques, N. Palma, Comparative European Institutions and the Little Divergence, 1385 –

  44. [52]

    Fochesato, Origins of Europe’s north-south divide: Population changes, real wages and the ‘little divergence’ in early modern Europe

    M. Fochesato, Origins of Europe’s north-south divide: Population changes, real wages and the ‘little divergence’ in early modern Europe. Explor. Econ. Hist. 70, 91–131 (2018)

    2018

  45. [53]

    R. C. Allen, The Great Divergence in European Wages and Prices from the Middle Ages to the First World War. Explor. Econ. Hist. 38, 411–447 (2001)

    2001

  46. [54]

    Buringh, The Population of European Cities from 700 to 2000: Social and Economic History

    E. Buringh, The Population of European Cities from 700 to 2000: Social and Economic History. Res. Data J. Humanit. Soc. Sci. 6, 1–18 (2021)

    2021

  47. [55]

    Baten, M

    J. Baten, M. Blum, Why are you tall while others are short? Agricultural production and other proximate determinants of global heights. Eur. Rev. Econ. Hist. 18, 144–165 (2014)

    2014

  48. [56]

    A composite view of well-being since 1820

    A. Rijpma, “A composite view of well-being since 1820” in How Was Life?, J. L. Van Zanden, J. Baten, M. Mira d’Ercole, A. Rijpma, M. P. Timmer, Eds. (OECD, 2014), pp. 249 –269

    2014

  49. [57]

    Buringh, B

    E. Buringh, B. M. S. Campbell, A. Rijpma, J. L. Van Zanden, Church building and the economy during Europe’s ‘Age of the Cathedrals’, 700–1500 CE. Explor. Econ. Hist. 76, 101316 (2020)

    2020

  50. [58]

    Swedish Regional GDP 1855–2000: Estimations and General Trends in the Swedish Regional System

    K. Enflo, M. Henning, L. Schön, “Swedish Regional GDP 1855–2000: Estimations and General Trends in the Swedish Regional System” in Research in Economic History, (Emerald Group Publishing, 2014), pp. 47–89

    2000

  51. [59]

    Delefortrie, J

    N. Delefortrie, J. Morice, Les revenus départementaux en 1864 et en 1954. Population 15, 721 (1960)

    1960

  52. [60]

    M. P. Squicciarini, N. Voigtländer, Human Capital and Industrialization: Evidence from the Age of Enlightenment *. Q. J. Econ. 130, 1825–1883 (2015)

    2015

  53. [61]

    Geary, T

    F. Geary, T. Stark, Regional GDP in the UK, 1861-1911: new estimates: Regional GDP. Econ. Hist. Rev. 68, 123–144 (2015)

    2015

  54. [62]

    Office for National Statistics

    Office for National Statistics, Historical Regional GDP 1968 to 1970 and 1971 to 1996. Office for National Statistics. Deposited 2016

    1968

  55. [63]

    Felice, The roots of a dual equilibrium: GDP, productivity, and structural change in the Italian regions in the long run (1871–2011)

    E. Felice, The roots of a dual equilibrium: GDP, productivity, and structural change in the Italian regions in the long run (1871–2011). Eur. Rev. Econ. Hist. (2018). 20 https://doi.org/10.1093/ereh/hey018

    2018 doi

  56. [64]

    Badia-Miró, J

    M. Badia-Miró, J. Guilera, P. Lains, Reconstruction of the Regional GDP of Portugal, 1890 -

  57. [65]

    Buyst, Reversal of Fortune in a Small, Open Economy: Regional GDP in Belgium, 1896 -

    E. Buyst, Reversal of Fortune in a Small, Open Economy: Regional GDP in Belgium, 1896 -

  58. [66]

    Eurostat

    Eurostat, Gross domestic product (GDP) at current market prices by NUTS 2 regions. Eurostat. Deposited 2023

    2023

  59. [67]

    Office for National Statistics

    Office for National Statistics, Regional gross domestic product: all ITL regions. Office for National Statistics. Deposited 2022

    2022

  60. [68]

    Bureau of Economic Analysis

    Bureau of Economic Analysis, Gross Domestic Product by Metropolitan Area. Bureau of Economic Analysis. Deposited 2018

    2018

  61. [69]

    Statistics Canada

    Statistics Canada, Metropolitan gross domestic product. Statistics Canada. Deposited 2014

    2014

  62. [70]

    Deposited 2013

    State Statistics Services Ukraine, Валовий регіональний продукт. Deposited 2013

    2013

  63. [71]

    Deposited 2023

    Belstat, Gross regional product at current prices. Deposited 2023

    2023

  64. [72]

    Deposited 2020

    Rosstat, Gross Regional Product at current basic prices per capita (1998-2019). Deposited 2020

    1998

  65. [73]

    Prados De La Escosura, International Comparisons of Real Product, 1820–1990: An Alternative Data Set

    L. Prados De La Escosura, International Comparisons of Real Product, 1820–1990: An Alternative Data Set. Explor. Econ. Hist. 37, 1–41 (2000)

    2000

  66. [74]

    M. J. Klasing, P. Milionis, Quantifying the evolution of world trade, 1870–1949. J. Int. Econ. 92, 185–197 (2014)

    2014

  67. [75]

    Pomeranz, The great divergence: China, Europe, and the making of the modern world economy, First Princeton Classics Paperback Edition (Princeton University Press, 2021)

    K. Pomeranz, The great divergence: China, Europe, and the making of the modern world economy, First Princeton Classics Paperback Edition (Princeton University Press, 2021)

    2021

  68. [76]

    Maddison

    R. Inklaar, H. de Jong, J. Bolt, J. L. Van Zanden, Rebasing “Maddison”: new income comparisons and the shape of long-run economic development. Gron. Growth Dev. Cent. Res. Memo. 174 (2018)

    2018

  69. [77]

    Hube, Bias in Wikipedia in Proceedings of the 26th International Conference on World Wide Web Companion - WWW ’17 Companion, (ACM Press, 2017), pp

    C. Hube, Bias in Wikipedia in Proceedings of the 26th International Conference on World Wide Web Companion - WWW ’17 Companion, (ACM Press, 2017), pp. 717–721

    2017

  70. [78]

    Dittus, M

    M. Dittus, M. Graham, Mapping Wikipedia’s Geolinguistic Contours. Digit. Cult. Soc. 5, 147– 164 (2019)

    2019

  71. [79]

    Pfeil, P

    U. Pfeil, P. Zaphiris, C. S. Ang, Cultural Differences in Collaborative Authoring of Wikipedia. J. Comput.-Mediat. Commun. 12, 88–113 (2006)

    2006

  72. [80]

    E. S. Callahan, S. C. Herring, Cultural bias in Wikipedia content on famous persons. J. Am. Soc. Inf. Sci. Technol. 62, 1899–1915 (2011)

    2011

  73. [81]

    Halavais, D

    A. Halavais, D. Lackaff, An Analysis of Topical Coverage of Wikipedia. J. Comput.-Mediat. Commun. 13, 429–440 (2008)

    2008

  74. [82]

    Chesney, An empirical examination of Wikipedia’s credibility

    T. Chesney, An empirical examination of Wikipedia’s credibility. First Monday 11 (2006)

    2006

  75. [83]

    Giles, Internet encyclopaedias go head to head

    J. Giles, Internet encyclopaedias go head to head. Nature 438, 900–901 (2005)

    2005

  76. [84]

    Serafinelli, G

    M. Serafinelli, G. Tabellini, Creativity over time and space: A historical analysis of European cities. J. Econ. Growth 27, 1–43 (2022)

    2022

  77. [85]

    De La Croix, O

    D. De La Croix, O. Licandro, The longevity of famous people from Hammurabi to Einstein. J. Econ. Growth 20, 263–303 (2015)

    2015

  78. [86]

    C. A. Hidalgo, R. Hausmann, The building blocks of economic complexity. PNAS 106, 10570–10575 (2009)

    2009

  79. [87]

    Balland, et al., The new paradigm of economic complexity

    P.-A. Balland, et al., The new paradigm of economic complexity. Res. Policy 51, 104450 (2022)

    2022

  80. [88]

    Stojkoski, Z

    V. Stojkoski, Z. Utkovski, L. Kocarev, The Impact of Services on Economic Complexity: Service Sophistication as Route for Economic Growth. PLOS ONE 11, e0161633 (2016)

    2016

  81. [89]

    Koch, Economic complexity and growth: Can value-added exports better explain the link? Econ

    P. Koch, Economic complexity and growth: Can value-added exports better explain the link? Econ. Lett. 198, 109682 (2021)

    2021

  82. [90]

    Domini, Patterns of specialization and economic complexity through the lens of universal exhibitions, 1855-1900

    G. Domini, Patterns of specialization and economic complexity through the lens of universal exhibitions, 1855-1900. Explor. Econ. Hist. 101421 (2022). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eeh.2021.101421

    2022

  83. [91]

    R. Hausmann, et al., The Atlas of economic complexity: Mapping paths to prosperity (Center for International Development, Harvard University and Harvard Kennedy School and Macro 21 Connections, MIT and Massachusetts Institute of Technology, 2011)

    2011

  84. [92]

    Stojkoski, P

    V. Stojkoski, P. Koch, C. A. Hidalgo, Multidimensional economic complexity and inclusive green growth. Commun. Earth Environ. 4, 130 (2023)

    2023

  85. [93]

    I. M. Weber, G. Semieniuk, T. Westland, J. Liang, What You Exported Matters: Persistence in Productive Capabilities across Two Eras of Globalization. UMass Amherst Econ. Dep. Work. Pap. Ser. 2021–02 (2021)

    2021

  86. [94]

    Hartmann, M

    D. Hartmann, M. R. Guevara, C. Jara-Figueroa, M. Aristarán, C. A. Hidalgo, Linking Economic Complexity, Institutions, and Income Inequality. World Dev. 93, 75–93 (2017)

    2017

  87. [95]

    Lapatinas, The effect of the Internet on economic sophistication: An empirical analysis

    A. Lapatinas, The effect of the Internet on economic sophistication: An empirical analysis. Econ. Lett. 174, 35–38 (2019)

    2019

  88. [96]

    J. P. Romero, C. Gramkow, Economic complexity and greenhouse gas emissions. World Dev. 139, 105317 (2021)

    2021

  89. [97]

    H. Zou, T. Hastie, Regularization and Variable Selection Via the Elastic Net. J. R. Stat. Soc. Ser. B Stat. Methodol. 67, 301–320 (2005)

    2005

  90. [98]

    Bairoch, J

    P. Bairoch, J. Batou, P. Chèvre, La population des villes européennes de 800 à 1850 (Librairie Droz, 1988)

    1988

  91. [99]

    J. E. Dittmar, Information Technology and Economic Change: The Impact of The Printing Press. Q. J. Econ. 126, 1133–1172 (2011)

    2011

  92. [100]

    J. B. De Long, A. Shleifer, Princes and Merchants: European City Growth before the Industrial Revolution. J. Law Econ. 36, 671–702 (1993)

    1993

  93. [101]

    Mokyr, C

    J. Mokyr, C. Ó Gráda, Height and Health in the United Kingdom 1815–1860: Evidence from the East India Company Army. Explor. Econ. Hist. 33, 141–168 (1996)

    1996

  94. [102]

    H. J. Brinkman, J. W. Drukker, B. Slot, Height and income: A new method for the estimation of historical national income series. Explor. Econ. Hist. 25, 227–264 (1988)

    1988

  95. [103]

    R. H. Steckel, Height and Per Capita Income. Hist. Methods J. Quant. Interdiscip. Hist. 16, 1–7 (1983)

    1983

  96. [104]

    Acemoglu, D

    D. Acemoglu, D. Cantoni, S. Johnson, J. A. Robinson, The Consequences of Radical Reform: The French Revolution. Am. Econ. Rev. 101, 3286–3307 (2011)

    2011

  97. [105]

    J. C. Smith, Nuremberg, a Renaissance city, 1500-1618, 1st ed (Published for the Archer M. Huntington Art Gallery, the University of Texas at Austin [by the] University of Texas Press, 1983)

    1983

  98. [106]

    J. C. Smith, Netherlandish Artists and Art in Renaissance Nuremberg. Simiolus Neth. Q. Hist. Art 20, 153 (1990)

    1990

  99. [107]

    S. O. Becker, L. Woessmann, Was Weber Wrong? A Human Capital Theory of Protestant Economic History. Q. J. Econ. 124, 531–596 (2009)

    2009

  100. [108]

    S. O. Becker, S. Pfaff, J. Rubin, Causes and consequences of the Protestant Reformation. Explor. Econ. Hist. 62, 1–25 (2016)

    2016

  101. [109]

    Cantoni, The Economic Effects of the Protestant Reformation: Testing the Weber Hypothesis in the German Lands

    D. Cantoni, The Economic Effects of the Protestant Reformation: Testing the Weber Hypothesis in the German Lands. J. Eur. Econ. Assoc. 13, 561–598 (2015)

    2015

  102. [110]

    R. C. Nash, Urbanization in the Colonial South: Charleston, South Carolina, as a Case Study. J. Urban Hist. 19, 3–29 (1992)

    1992

  103. [111]

    A. L. Slap, F. Towers, D. R. Goldfield, Eds., Confederate cities: the urban South during the Civil War era (The University of Chicago Press, 2015)

    2015

  104. [112]

    A. S. Pereira, The Opportunity of a Disaster: The Economic Impact of the 1755 Lisbon Earthquake. J. Econ. Hist. 69, 466 (2009)

    2009

  105. [113]

    A value for n-person games

    L. Shapley, “A value for n-person games” in Contributions to the Theory of Games (AM- 28). Volume 2, (Princeton University Press, 1953), pp. 307–317

    1953

  106. [114]

    S. M. Lundberg, S.-I. Lee, A Unified Approach to Interpreting Model Predictions. Adv. Neural Inf. Process. Syst. 30 (2017)

    2017

  107. [115]

    Rozemberczki, et al., The Shapley Value in Machine Learning

    B. Rozemberczki, et al., The Shapley Value in Machine Learning. (2022). https://doi.org/10.48550/ARXIV.2202.05594

    2022 doi arXiv

  108. [116]

    Singular Value Decomposition and Least Squares Solutions

    G. H. Golub, C. Reinsch, “Singular Value Decomposition and Least Squares Solutions” in Handbook for Automatic Computation, F. L. Bauer, et al., Eds. (Springer Berlin Heidelberg, 1971), pp. 134–151

    1971

  109. [1800]

    J. Econ. Growth (2022). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10887-022-09213-5

    2022 doi

  110. [1850]

    J. Econ. Hist. 79, 477–506 (2019)

    2019

  111. [1980]

    UB Econ. - Work. Pap. 12/280 (2012)

    2012

  112. [2000]

    SSRN Electron. J. (2009). https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.1586762

    2009 doi

Pith tools

Reviewed August 15, 2026 · model on record in the stance chip above.