pith. sign in

arxiv: 1907.10593 · v1 · pith:X2ZEOSORnew · submitted 2019-07-04 · 💻 cs.OH

Modeling and analysis of alternative distribution and Physical Internet schemes in urban area

Hao Jiang (RSM) , Eric Ballot , Shenle Pan (CGS i3) This is my paper

Pith reviewed 2026-05-25 02:33 UTC · model grok-4.3

classification 💻 cs.OH
keywords urban logisticsPhysical Internetdistribution schemesoptimization modelexternal impactsBordeauxsustainability
0
0 comments X

The pith

An optimization model finds the Physical Internet scheme improves urban distribution performance in Bordeaux when external costs are included.

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The paper develops a methodology to evaluate and optimize different urban distribution schemes by building an optimization model on top of an analytical representation of logistics flows. External impacts such as accidents, air pollution, climate change, noise and congestion are added to the cost calculations alongside traditional expenses. The model is used to select transportation means and compare schemes including the Physical Internet approach. Application to the Bordeaux urban area produces results indicating that the PI scheme delivers better overall performance than the alternatives examined.

Core claim

The central claim is that the Physical Internet scheme improves the performances of distribution, as shown by results from an optimization model applied to Bordeaux city that incorporates external impact costs and compares multiple distribution schemes.

What carries the argument

An optimization model built on an analytical model of logistics flows that selects transportation means and distribution schemes while accounting for external impact costs.

If this is right

  • Cities can use the model to identify distribution schemes that reduce combined internal and external costs.
  • Redesign of logistics networks can be evaluated as an alternative or complement to simply switching to clean vehicles.
  • The inclusion of external costs changes which scheme ranks as most efficient in urban settings.

Where Pith is reading between the lines

These are editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • The same modeling approach could be applied to other cities to test whether PI advantages hold outside Bordeaux.
  • If the model is accurate, regulators could use it to set incentives that favor PI-compatible infrastructure.
  • Extending the analytical model with time-varying demand data would allow evaluation of dynamic routing benefits.

Load-bearing premise

The analytical model used to build the optimization accurately represents real logistics flows, external impact costs, and scheme alternatives in the Bordeaux urban area.

What would settle it

Direct field measurements of total costs including external impacts under a deployed PI scheme in Bordeaux that show no net improvement over traditional schemes.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 1907.10593 by Eric Ballot, Hao Jiang (RSM), Shenle Pan (CGS i3).

Figure 1
Figure 1. Figure 1: Illustrating wholistic methodology of this study [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p004_1.png] view at source ↗
Figure 3
Figure 3. Figure 3: Total Distance of Different Schemes [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p011_3.png] view at source ↗
Figure 6
Figure 6. Figure 6: Total Cost of Different Schemes [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p012_6.png] view at source ↗
Figure 8
Figure 8. Figure 8: is the results of optimization compared with Simple PI scheme with small vehicles in [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p013_8.png] view at source ↗
Figure 10
Figure 10. Figure 10: Impact of Speed on Total Cost [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p014_10.png] view at source ↗
read the original abstract

Urban logistics is becoming more complicated and costlier due to new challenges in recent years. Since the main problem lies on congestion, the clean vehicle is not necessarily the most effective solution. There is thus a need to redesign the logistics networks in the city. This paper proposes a methodology to evaluate different distribution schemes in the city among which we find the most efficient and sustainable one. External impacts are added to the analysis of schemes, including accident, air pollution, climate change, noise, and congestion. An optimization model based on an analytical model is developed to optimize transportation means and distribution schemes. Results based on Bordeaux city show that PI scheme improves the performances of distribution.

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, simulated authors' rebuttal, and a circularity audit. Tearing a paper down is the easy half of reading it; the pith above is the substance, this is the friction.

Referee Report

2 major / 2 minor

Summary. The paper proposes a methodology to evaluate alternative urban distribution schemes, including Physical Internet (PI) variants, by incorporating external costs (accidents, air pollution, climate change, noise, congestion) into an optimization model built on an analytical representation of logistics flows. The model optimizes transportation means and scheme selection; results for Bordeaux are claimed to show that the PI scheme improves overall distribution performance relative to conventional alternatives.

Significance. If the analytical model and its parameterization are shown to be faithful to real Bordeaux flows and externality costs, the work would provide a concrete, quantitative comparison of scheme performance that includes sustainability metrics. This could inform city-level logistics planning. However, the absence of any reported validation, calibration data sources, or sensitivity analysis on the analytical expressions for travel times, load factors, and impact functions leaves the comparative ranking unsupported.

major comments (2)
  1. [Abstract and optimization model description] The central claim that 'PI scheme improves the performances of distribution' (abstract) rests on optimization outputs whose reliability cannot be assessed because no validation of the analytical model against observed Bordeaux logistics data, load factors, or external cost parameters is presented. Without such grounding, the ranking of schemes is not load-bearing.
  2. [Methodology / analytical model section] The analytical model is described as the foundation for the optimization, yet no equations, assumptions on travel-time functions, or external-impact cost formulations are supplied or tested. This prevents evaluation of whether the model accurately encodes real flows and externalities as required by the skeptic concern.
minor comments (2)
  1. Clarify the exact definition of the PI scheme versus the baseline schemes and list all decision variables and constraints in the optimization model.
  2. Provide the data sources used for Bordeaux flows, vehicle parameters, and externality unit costs.

Simulated Author's Rebuttal

2 responses · 0 unresolved

We thank the referee for the constructive comments. We address the major points below and commit to revisions that will improve the grounding and transparency of the model.

read point-by-point responses

  1. Referee: [Abstract and optimization model description] The central claim that 'PI scheme improves the performances of distribution' (abstract) rests on optimization outputs whose reliability cannot be assessed because no validation of the analytical model against observed Bordeaux logistics data, load factors, or external cost parameters is presented. Without such grounding, the ranking of schemes is not load-bearing.

    Authors: We agree that the absence of direct validation against observed Bordeaux flow data limits the strength of the comparative claims. External cost parameters follow standard values from the European literature on transport externalities, and load factors reflect typical urban freight values; however, no proprietary observed logistics data for Bordeaux were available to us. In revision we will add an explicit subsection listing all parameter sources, state the limitations clearly, and include a sensitivity analysis on load factors and externality costs to test whether the ranking of schemes remains stable. revision: yes

  2. Referee: [Methodology / analytical model section] The analytical model is described as the foundation for the optimization, yet no equations, assumptions on travel-time functions, or external-impact cost formulations are supplied or tested. This prevents evaluation of whether the model accurately encodes real flows and externalities as required by the skeptic concern.

    Authors: The analytical expressions for travel times, load factors, and external-impact costs are derived in Section 3, but we accept that they are not presented with sufficient explicit equations or assumption lists in the current text. We will revise Section 3 to include the complete set of equations, clearly state all functional assumptions (e.g., linear travel-time functions, constant load factors per scheme), and add a short paragraph discussing how the formulations approximate real urban flows. revision: yes

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged

No circularity: derivation self-contained against external benchmarks

full rationale

The abstract and available text describe an optimization model built on an analytical model for comparing distribution schemes in Bordeaux, with external impacts included. No equations, parameter-fitting steps, or self-citations are quoted that reduce any prediction to its own inputs by construction. The central claim (PI scheme superiority) rests on model outputs applied to city data, but without exhibited self-definitional loops, fitted inputs renamed as predictions, or load-bearing self-citations, the derivation does not collapse to tautology. This is the normal honest finding when no specific reduction is demonstrable from the text.

Axiom & Free-Parameter Ledger

0 free parameters · 1 axioms · 0 invented entities

The central claim rests on an unspecified analytical model whose accuracy is taken as given; no free parameters, axioms, or invented entities are visible in the abstract.

axioms (1)
  • domain assumption The analytical model captures all relevant logistics dynamics and external impact costs for Bordeaux
    Invoked when the optimization model is developed from the analytical model

pith-pipeline@v0.9.0 · 5641 in / 1135 out tokens · 36851 ms · 2026-05-25T02:33:16.027260+00:00 · methodology

discussion (0)

Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

15 extracted references · 15 canonical work pages

  1. [1]

    URL https://www.cnbc.com/2018/11/11/alibaba-singles-day-2018-record-sales-on- largest-shopping-event-day.html (accessed 4.16.19)

    • Alibaba Singles Day 2018: Record sales on largest shopping event day [WWW Document], n.d. URL https://www.cnbc.com/2018/11/11/alibaba-singles-day-2018-record-sales-on- largest-shopping-event-day.html (accessed 4.16.19). • Anand, N., Van Duin Hogeschool Rotterdam, J., Tavasszy, L., Quak, H., van Duin, R., Tavasszy, L.,

    work page 2018

  2. [2]

    Procedia -Social Behav

    The use of light electric vehicles in urban freight View project CITYLAB City Logistics in Living Laboratories View project City logistics modeling efforts: Trends and gaps -A review. Procedia -Social Behav. Sci. 39, 101–115. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sbspro.2012.03.094 • Archetti, C., Savelsbergh, M., Speranza, G.,

    work page doi:10.1016/j.sbspro.2012.03.094 2012

  3. [3]

    Dynamic Pickup and Delivery Problem. Eur. [Hao Jiang, Eric Ballot, Shenle Pan] 16 J. Oper. Res. 202, 8–15. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ejor.2009.04.024 • Browne, M., Allen, J., Leonardi, J.,

    work page doi:10.1016/j.ejor.2009.04.024 2009

  4. [4]

    IATSS Res

    Evaluating the use of an urban consolidation centre and electric vehicles in central London. IATSS Res. 35, 1–6. https://doi.org/10.1016/J.IATSSR.2011.06.002 • Cleophas, C., Cottrill, C., Ehmke, J.F., Tierney, K.,

    work page doi:10.1016/j.iatssr.2011.06.002 2011

  5. [5]

    Collaborative urban transportation: Recent advances in theory and practice. Eur. J. Oper. Res. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ejor.2018.04.037 • Crainic, T.G., Ricciardi, N., Storchi, G.,

    work page doi:10.1016/j.ejor.2018.04.037 2018

  6. [6]

    Advanced freight transportation systems for congested urban areas. Transp. Res. Part C Emerg. Technol. 12, 119–137. https://doi.org/10.1016/J.TRC.2004.07.002 • Cuda, R.,

    work page doi:10.1016/j.trc.2004.07.002 2004

  7. [7]

    https://doi.org/10.3390/su9081324 • Hemmelmayr, V.C., Gabriel, T.,

    work page doi:10.3390/su9081324

  8. [8]

    https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cor.2012.04.007 • Kin, B., Spoor, J., Verlinde, S., Macharis, C., Van Woensel, T.,

    Computers & Operations Research An adaptive large neighborhood search heuristic for Two-Echelon Vehicle Routing Problems arising in city logistics 39, 3215–3228. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cor.2012.04.007 • Kin, B., Spoor, J., Verlinde, S., Macharis, C., Van Woensel, T.,

    work page doi:10.1016/j.cor.2012.04.007 2012

  9. [9]

    Case Stud

    Modelling alternative distribution set-ups for fragmented last mile transport: Towards more efficient and sustainable urban freight transport. Case Stud. Transp. Policy 6, 125–132. https://doi.org/10.1016/J.CSTP.2017.11.009 • Lin, J., Chen, Q., Kawamura, K., Lin, J., Chen, Q., Kawamura, K., n.d. Sustainability SI: Logistics Cost and Environmental Impact A...

    work page doi:10.1016/j.cstp.2017.11.009 2017

  10. [10]

    The 4 A’s of sustainable city distribution: Innovative solutions and challenges ahead. Int. J. Sustain. Transp. 11, 59–71. https://doi.org/10.1080/15568318.2016.1196404 • Michael Browne, by, Sweet, M., Woodburn, A., Allen, J., Browne, M.,

    work page doi:10.1080/15568318.2016.1196404 2016

  11. [11]

    • Pillac, V., Gendreau, M., Guéret, C., Medaglia, A.L.,

    Physical Internet Foundations, in: 14th IFAC Symposium on Information Control Problems in Manufacturing and Then Information Control Problems in Manufacturing, Bucharest, Romania (2012). • Pillac, V., Gendreau, M., Guéret, C., Medaglia, A.L.,

    work page 2012

  12. [12]

    A review of dynamic vehicle routing problems. Eur. J. Oper. Res. 225, 1–11. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ejor.2012.08.015 • Psaraftis, H.N., Wen, M., Kontovas, C.A.,

    work page doi:10.1016/j.ejor.2012.08.015 2012

  13. [13]

    Networks 67, 3–31

    Dynamic vehicle routing problems: Three decades and counting. Networks 67, 3–31. https://doi.org/10.1002/net.21628 • Ranieri, L., Digiesi, S., Silvestri, B., Roccotelli, M.,

    work page doi:10.1002/net.21628

  14. [14]

    A review of last mile logistics innovations in an externalities cost reduction vision. Sustain. 10, 1–18. https://doi.org/10.3390/su10030782 • United Nations,

    work page doi:10.3390/su10030782

  15. [15]

    URL https://www.un.org/development/desa/publications/2018-revision-of-world-urbanization- prospects.html (accessed 4.24.19)

    2018 Revision of World Urbanization Prospects | Multimedia Library - United Nations Department of Economic and Social Affairs [WWW Document]. URL https://www.un.org/development/desa/publications/2018-revision-of-world-urbanization- prospects.html (accessed 4.24.19)

    work page 2018