Pith. sign in

REVIEW 3 major objections 6 minor 29 references

GHz non-reciprocal optical conductivity in hematite ($\alpha$-$\text{Fe}_2\text{O}_3$)

T0 review · 3 major / 6 minor · reviewed 2026-08-01 · deepseek-v4-flash

Challenge this review Re-run · record.json Download PDF Read on arXiv ↗

Pith's one-line read In a canted easy-plane antiferromagnet like hematite, the net moment induced by DMI canting produces a non-zero Hall optical conductivity at GHz frequencies.

desk verdict Clean symmetry-based prediction of a GHz Hall conductivity in canted hematite, but all quantitative numbers hang on an undetermined spin-electric coupling that the authors themselves call a crude estimate. read the letter →

arxiv 2607.22176 v1 pith:X6L6X3WM submitted 2026-07-24 cond-mat.str-el

Peng Rao , Johannes Gröbmeyer , P. Peter Stavropoulos , Alexander Mook , Matthias Althammer , Hans Huebl , Alexander Holleitner , Johannes Knolle This is my paper
classification cond-mat.str-el PACS 75.50.Ee75.30.Ds78.20.Ci
keywords hematitenon-reciprocalopticalconductivitymagnonDzyaloshinskii-MoriyainteractionantiferromagnetGHzcirculatorlinearspinwavetheory
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal

The pith

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The reading

Taking hematite in its canted easy-plane antiferromagnetic phase, the authors show that the small net moment m caused by Dzyaloshinskii-Moriya interactions acts as a measure of effective time-reversal symmetry breaking. Using linear spin wave theory and Kubo linear response, they compute the optical conductivity and find frequency peaks at the magnon gaps near 0.06 and 0.15 meV, in the GHz range. A finite m produces a non-zero antisymmetric (Hall) component of the form σ^as ∝ ε m, making the response non-reciprocal without any external magnetic field. If this holds, a common room-temperature antiferromagnetic insulator could serve as the active medium for magnetic-field-free circulators in the microwave domain.

What carries the argument

The central object is the spin-electric polarization operator P = Σ α_ij (S_i × S_j)·e_γ e_γ, which couples spins to an external electric field via V = −P·E. This is a local electric-field-induced DMI. Kubo linear response then gives the polarizability and conductivity. The key step is that the antisymmetric part of the conductivity is proportional to the net canting moment m, σ^as_αβ ∝ ε_αβγ m_γ, so the canting itself acts as the symmetry-breaking field. The magnon spectrum from linear spin wave theory provides the poles at which the conductivity peaks appear.

What would settle it

Measure the AC conductivity of a hematite single crystal in the canted easy-plane phase at 10–100 GHz and look for a non-zero antisymmetric component σ_zy (i.e., a non-reciprocal transmission difference) that disappears when cooling below the Morin transition, where the net moment m vanishes.

Watch

Extended reading notes

Core claim

The paper demonstrates that in hematite's canted easy-plane phase, the Dzyaloshinskii-Moriya interaction cants the sublattice moments, producing a small net magnetization m. This net moment breaks effective time-reversal symmetry and directly yields a non-zero antisymmetric optical conductivity, σ^as_αβ ∝ ε_αβγ m_γ. Only the out-of-plane magnon branch, gapped by DMI and on-site anisotropy, contributes to this Hall conductivity. The response peaks at the zero-momentum magnon gaps (~0.06 and ~0.15 meV), which lie in the GHz range and can be tuned by material parameters. Using these conductivities as input to a scattering-matrix model, the authors find non-reciprocal circulator transmission rat

Load-bearing premise

The calculation assumes that the polarization operator P = Σ α_ij (S_i × S_j)·e_γ is the dominant spin-electric coupling in hematite, with a coupling strength α_ij estimated by a very crude magnetoelectric argument; if the true value is smaller, the predicted non-reciprocal response shrinks proportionally.

Editorial extensions

If this is right

  • If the calculation is correct, hematite can serve as a building block for circulators and other non-reciprocal microwave devices operating at GHz frequencies without any applied magnetic field.
  • The operation frequency is set by magnon gaps that depend on DMI and anisotropy, so materials engineering (doping, epitaxial strain) can tune the device frequency.
  • The same mechanism should apply to other canted easy-plane antiferromagnetic insulators with finite DMI, such as orthoferrites, extending the approach to room-temperature operation.
  • Since hematite's weak ferromagnetic phase persists above room temperature, the non-reciprocal response is available at ambient conditions.
  • The effect is a genuinely AC (sub-gap) analog of the quantum anomalous Hall effect in an insulating magnet, distinct from DC topological transport.

Reading between the lines

Editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • The predicted magnitude of the conductivity scales with the square of the unknown spin-electric coupling α_ij; if that coupling is smaller than the authors' crude estimate (C=0.1), the circulator performance would degrade proportionally, so the quantitative promises depend on a microscopic determination of α_ij.
  • Because σ^as ∝ ε m, reversing the canting direction should reverse the sign of the Hall response; in hematite this could be controlled by cooling through the Morin transition or by a small in-plane field, offering a switchable non-reciprocity.
  • The Hall conductivity peak frequency is set directly by the DMI and anisotropy gaps, so a measurement of the GHz absorption spectrum of hematite would provide a direct test and also constrain the unknown coupling constant.
  • The single-magnon approximation yields a non-vanishing σ_zy at large ω, which the authors attribute to an artifact; a full multi-magnon calculation could change the high-frequency tail and possibly the peak heights, adding uncertainty to the circulator numbers.
Share X Bluesky LinkedIn Reddit HN

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, and a circularity audit.

Referee Report

3 major / 6 minor

Summary. The paper studies the sub-gap optical conductivity of the canted easy-plane antiferromagnet α-Fe2O3 (hematite) using linear spin-wave theory and Kubo linear response. Starting from a spin Hamiltonian with parameters taken from the literature, the authors find a canted classical ground state whose canting angle matches neutron data, and compute the low-energy magnon spectrum, with gaps in the GHz range. They then introduce a spin-electric polarization operator P = Σ α_ij (S_i × S_j)·e_γ e_γ (Eq. 11) and, using linear response, obtain a finite antisymmetric (Hall) conductivity σ_zy(ω) that satisfies σ^as_αβ ∝ ε_αβγ m_γ, where m is the DMI-induced net moment. This leads to a predicted room-temperature, field-free non-reciprocal GHz response, which the authors model into a three-port circulator with |S13/S31| up to ~17 dB. The paper ships a Mathematica notebook that automates the LSWT and conductivity calculation.

Significance. If the assumed spin-electric coupling is realized in hematite with a sufficiently large coupling constant, the proposal is noteworthy: it would demonstrate an intrinsic, field-free AC anomalous Hall response in a common antiferromagnetic insulator at room temperature, with potential for microwave circulator applications. The paper has several strengths: the spin Hamiltonian parameters are taken from an independent ab initio study, the linear spin-wave and Kubo calculations are internally consistent, the canting angle reproduces the experimental value, and the symmetry-based relation between the Hall conductivity and the net moment is clear. The availability of the Mathematica notebook reduces reproducibility concerns. However, the quantitative predictions (conductivity magnitudes and circulator isolation) rest on an undetermined and admitted crude estimate of the polarization coupling α_ij; the qualitative symmetry argument is credible, but the numerical claims are not robust until that coupling is microscopically constrained.

major comments (3)
  1. [Sec. III, Eq. (11)] The central prediction of a nonzero Hall conductivity is conditional on the assumed form of the spin-electric polarization. Eq. (11) is introduced as an ansatz; the text notes it is exact on a C3-symmetric honeycomb lattice but does not derive it for the R-3c structure of hematite (Sec. III, paragraph before Eq. (16)). The symmetry-based argument after Eq. (15) only shows that the given P yields a nonzero off-diagonal response; it does not rule out other symmetry-allowed couplings, and indeed the electrostriction term in Eq. (14) yields only σ_zz and no Hall effect. Thus, if the dominant spin-electric coupling for hematite is not of the form Eq. (11), the antisymmetric conductivity could be absent or much smaller. The authors' statement that 'the general conclusions do not depend on the specific form of P' is not established: varying e_γ within Eq. (11) is not the same as varying the ope
  2. [Sec. IIIA and Appendix B] All quantitative magnitudes—Re σ in Fig. 4(a), the Hall conductivity peak in Fig. 4(b), and the circulator circularity in Fig. 6—are proportional to C = α_ij^2/(Aℏ), which is set to C=0.1 with the admission that it is 'large for hematite according to our estimates' (Sec. IIIA) and that the estimation method is 'very crude' (Appendix B). The estimate in Appendix B anchors α to a linear magnetoelectric coefficient aµ0 ≈ 600 ps/m, close to the largest single-phase ME coefficient known; if the actual coefficient is at the more common Cr2O3 scale (~4.3 ps/m), C would shrink by a factor (4.3/600)^2 ≈ 5×10^-5, reducing the predicted GHz conductivity and the 17 dB isolation by orders of magnitude. More fundamentally, the static ME coefficient is not obviously equal to the dynamic spin-electric coupling at GHz frequencies; a separate microscopic determination (e.g., from ab initio or from measure
  3. [Sec. IV and Appendix D] The circulator model in Appendix D is the Mahoney et al. scattering theory for chiral edge channels, in which the admittance is determined by a frequency-independent σ_yz and the phase φ = ω C_edge/σ_yz. Here σ_yz(ω) is a strongly frequency-dependent bulk conductivity with a resonance at the magnon gap (Fig. 4(b)). The model treats σ_yz as a scalar in Eqs. (D3)-(D5) and does not include the full ω dependence of the complex σ_yz in evaluating the scattering matrix. This is not merely a presentation issue: the resonance frequency and line shape of |S13|/|S31| could differ substantially if the actual σ_yz(ω) is inserted self-consistently, especially because the conductivity varies rapidly near the gap. Please justify the applicability of the edge-channel capacitance model to a bulk Hall medium with this σ_yz(ω), or assess the sensitivity of the circularity to the frequency dependence.
minor comments (6)
  1. [Abstract] Typo: 'using the the microscopic spin Hamiltonian' should be 'using the microscopic spin Hamiltonian'.
  2. [Fig. 6 caption] 'Plotes' should be 'Plots'.
  3. [Sec. IIA and Eqs. (7)-(8)] The text states that the triaxial basal anisotropy is 'of order 1 neV' from Refs. [10,11], while d6 = 10^-8 meV = 0.01 neV. Please clarify the apparent discrepancy or correct the unit conversion.
  4. [Appendix B] The unit cell volume is given as V ≈ 3×10^-28 m; the units should be m^3 (or another volume unit). Also define A = a_c c_c more clearly as the area of the 2D unit cell projected onto the yz-plane.
  5. [Sec. IV] The sentence 'the circularity ... can be described by dividing the absolute elements of the scattering-matrix' should read 'absolute values of the elements'.
  6. [Sec. IIIA] The notation α_i j is used with a comma-less subscript; it would improve readability to define α_ij as a single symbol, and to state the sum over γ more explicitly after Eq. (11).

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged · score 0.0 of 10

No significant circularity: the Hall conductivity is computed from an external spin Hamiltonian plus an explicitly labeled spin-electric ansatz, not fitted to or defined by the target response.

full rationale

Walking the derivation chain: H (Eq. 1) and its parameters are taken from Ref. [8] (external, ab initio parameterization), not from the present authors; the classical ground state, canting angle, and magnon gaps are computed and checked against independent experiments. The spin-electric polarization operator P (Eq. 11) is introduced openly as an approximation: 'For hematite we approximate P...; α_ij are undetermined constants', with Ref. [6] cited only for exactness on a honeycomb lattice, not for hematite. The Hall conductivity (Eq. 22) is obtained via the Kubo formula (Eqs. 12-13) and the Onsager decomposition (Eqs. 20-21); the proportionality to the net moment m is a symmetry constraint, and the numerical coefficient is computed from the Hamiltonian, not adjusted to reproduce any measured conductivity or circulator isolation. The overall magnitude depends on C=0.1, which the paper labels 'large for hematite according to our estimates' and estimates by a method it calls 'very crude' (Sec. IIIA and Appendix B); this is an acknowledged input uncertainty, not a parameter fitted to the predicted output. The self-citations [9,15] are not load-bearing: [9] supplies a coordinate system and an anisotropy scale that does not enter the Hall channel, and [15] is a secondary citation for Onsager's relation alongside Landau [16]. The circulator simulation uses the standard Mahoney scattering-matrix model [2] with σ_yz as input. No equation reduces to its own input, and no fitted quantity is renamed a prediction. Therefore no circular step is identified.

Assumptions & free parameters 7 free parameters · 5 assumptions · 0 invented entities

The central derivation rests on the adopted spin Hamiltonian from Ref [8] and on an ad hoc polarization operator with a guessed coupling strength; the free parameters are mostly material constants taken from prior literature plus the unmeasured α_ij scale and the broadening δ. No new entities are introduced.

free parameters (7)
  • d2 = 10^-4 meV
    Second-order on-site anisotropy; chosen positive to stabilize the easy-plane canted state; value taken as a small positive number (Sec. II).
  • d6 = 10^-8 meV
    Triaxial basal anisotropy; taken from experimental anisotropy estimates (Refs [10,11]) and order-by-disorder theory (Ref [9]); controls the pseudo-Goldstone gap.
  • C (α_ij^2/(Aℏ)) = 0.1 (e^2/ℏ)
    Overall scale of the polarization coupling; estimated crudely in Appendix B and explicitly called 'large for hematite'; linearly scales all conductivities and circulator response.
  • δ = 0.01 meV
    Broadening parameter set by hand for numerical evaluation; determines peak width and height; microscopic calculation declared out of scope (Sec. III).
  • C_edge = 67.35 fF
    Edge capacitance in circulator model; estimated from parallel-plate geometry (Eq. D6).
  • C_p = 15 fF
    Parasitic capacitance chosen to maximize circularity (Sec. IV).
  • R_dissipative = 50 Ω
    Phenomenological dissipative resistance; chosen for the dissipative case (Sec. IV, Fig. 6).
assumptions (5)
  • domain assumption The spin Hamiltonian Eq. (1) with exchange up to 5th NN and DMI up to 4th NN, with parameters from Ref [8], faithfully models hematite in the easy-plane phase.
    Invoked in Sec. II; the computed gaps and conductivities depend on these parameters being accurate.
  • ad hoc to paper The polarization operator has the form P = Σ α_ij [(S_i × S_j)·e_γ] e_γ (Eq. 11) and is the dominant low-frequency spin-electric coupling.
    Introduced in Sec. III as an approximation; the undetermined α_ij controls the conductivity magnitude.
  • domain assumption The single-magnon approximation (keeping only terms linear in magnon operators in P) is sufficient near the magnon gaps.
    Appendix C; the high-frequency tail is acknowledged as an artifact of this approximation.
  • standard math The Kubo formula and the relation σ(ω) = -iωχ(ω) apply at GHz frequencies.
    Sec. III, Eq. (13); the authors note it holds only at low frequencies.
  • ad hoc to paper The Mahoney et al. three-port capacitive circulator scattering formalism (Appendix D), originally developed for chiral edge channels, applies to a bulk AC anomalous Hall medium characterized by σ_yz(ω).
    Sec. IV and Appendix D; this transfer of a device model is not microscopically justified for a bulk magnon-mediated Hall response.

how reviews work

0 comments
Cite this review

Pith. "Pith review of GHz non-reciprocal optical conductivity in hematite ($\alpha$-$\text{Fe}_2\text{O}_3$)." pith.science (2026). https://pith.science/paper/X6L6X3WM

@misc{pith2026260722176,
  author       = {Pith},
  title        = {Pith review of: GHz non-reciprocal optical conductivity in hematite ($\alpha$-$\textFe_2\textO_3$)},
  year         = {2026},
  howpublished = {\url{https://pith.science/paper/X6L6X3WM}},
  note         = {Machine review of arXiv:2607.22176}
}
abstract

We study the non-reciprocal properties of the iron oxide $\alpha$-Fe$_2$O$_3$ (hematite) in the canted easy-plane antiferromagnetic phase, specifically in the GHz to THz frequency range. First, using the the microscopic spin Hamiltonian, we obtain the correct classical ground state where the canting is induced by the Dzyaloshinskii-Moriya interactions (DMI). The magnon spectrum is simulated using linear spin wave theory. We then compute the polarizability and the sub-gap optical conductivities using linear response. We find that the conductivity tensor contains frequency peaks at the zero momentum magnon gaps of order $0.1~$meV which can be tuned by the DMI and on-site anisotropic spin interactions. Furthermore, we show that the canting-induced net magnetic moment $\mathbf{m}$ represents a measure for the effective time-reversal-symmetry breaking and non-reciprocity of the system: a finite $\mathbf{m}$ results in a non-zero Hall conductivity. Finally, we discuss the prospective application of hematite in non-reciprocal circulator design, by computing the non-reciprocal circulator transmission amplitude using the conductivities as input.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2607.22176 by the authors.

Figure 1
Figure 1. FIG. 1. Illustration of the unit cell of hematite ( [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p002_1.png] view at source ↗
Figure 2
Figure 2. FIG. 2. Linear spin wave spectrum for the spin Hamiltonian Eq. (1). [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p003_2.png] view at source ↗
Figure 3
Figure 3. FIG. 3. Minimal magnon gaps energy of the two lower branches in [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p004_3.png] view at source ↗
Figures from the paper (4 more)
Figure 4
Figure 4. Figure 4: FIG. 4. Real part of conductivities of the spin Hamiltonian Eq. (1) [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p005_4.png]
Figure 5
Figure 5. Figure 5: FIG. 5. Scheme of a three-port circulator with the sample material in [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p006_5.png]
Figure 6
Figure 6. Figure 6: FIG. 6. Simulated nonreciprocal response [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p006_6.png]
Figure 7
Figure 7. Figure 7: FIG. 7. Individual scattering matrix elements [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p009_7.png]

Discussion (0). Sign in to comment.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

29 extracted references

  1. [1]

    Chang, C.-X

    C.-Z. Chang, C.-X. Liu, and A. H. MacDonald, Colloquium: Quantum anomalous hall effect, Reviews of Modern Physics 95, 011002 (2023)

    2023

  2. [2]

    Mahoney, J

    A. Mahoney, J. Colless, S. Pauka, J. Hornibrook, J. Watson, G. Gardner, M. Manfra, A. Doherty, and D. Reilly, On-chip mi- crowave quantum hall circulator, Physical Review X7, 011007 (2017)

    2017

  3. [3]

    A. C. Mahoney, J. I. Colless, L. Peeters, S. J. Pauka, E. J. Fox, X. Kou, L. Pan, K. L. Wang, D. Goldhaber-Gordon, and D. J. Reilly, Zero-field edge plasmons in a magnetic topological in- sulator, Nature communications8, 1836 (2017)

    2017

  4. [4]

    Ng and P

    T.-K. Ng and P. A. Lee, Power-law conductivity inside the mott gap: Application toκ−(BEDT−TTF) 2cu2(CN)3, Phys. Rev. Lett.99, 156402 (2007)

    2007

  5. [5]

    Tokura, S

    Y . Tokura, S. Seki, and N. Nagaosa, Multiferroics of spin origin, Reports on Progress in Physics77, 076501 (2014)

    2014

  6. [6]

    Bolens, H

    A. Bolens, H. Katsura, M. Ogata, and S. Miyashita, Mechanism for subgap optical conductivity in honeycomb kitaev materials, Phys. Rev. B97, 161108 (2018)

    2018

  7. [7]

    F. J. Morin, Magnetic susceptibility ofα-Fe 2O3 andα-Fe 2O3 with added titanium, Phys. Rev.78, 819 (1950)

    1950

  8. [8]

    Dannegger, A

    T. Dannegger, A. De ´ak, L. R ´ozsa, E. Galindez-Ruales, S. Das, E. Baek, M. Kl ¨aui, L. Szunyogh, and U. Nowak, Magnetic properties of hematite revealed by an ab initio parameterized spin model, Phys. Rev. B107, 184426 (2023)

    2023

Show all 29 references
  1. [9]

    Hoyer, P

    R. Hoyer, P. P. Stavropoulos, A. Razpopov, R. Valent ´ı, L. ˇSmejkal, and A. Mook, Altermagnetic splitting of magnons in hematiteα-Fe 2O3, Phys. Rev. B112, 064425 (2025)

    2025

  2. [10]

    S. K. Banerjee, An attempt to observe the basal plane anisotropy of hematite, Philosophical Magazine8, 2119 (1963)

    1963

  3. [11]

    Flanders and W

    P. Flanders and W. Schuele, Anisotropy in the basal plane of hematite single crystals, Philosophical Magazine9, 485 (1964)

    1964

  4. [12]

    Rao and P

    P. Rao and P. P. Stavropoulos, Simulating the hematite magnon spectrum and conductivities using lswt, Zenodo 10.5281/zen- odo.18493957

    doi

  5. [13]

    A. Hill, F. Jiao, P. Bruce, A. Harrison, W. Kockelmann, and C. Ritter, Neutron diffraction study of mesoporous and bulk hematite,α-fe2o3, Chemistry of Materials20, 4891 (2008)

    2008

  6. [14]

    Galindez-Ruales, R

    E. Galindez-Ruales, R. Gonzalez-Hernandez, C. Schmitt, S. Das, F. Fuhrmann, A. Ross, E. Golias, A. Akashdeep, L. L ¨unenb¨urger, E. Baek,et al., Revealing the altermagnetism in hematite via xmcd imaging and anomalous hall electrical transport, Advanced Materials , e05019 (2025)

    2025

  7. [15]

    P. Rao, A. Mook, and J. Knolle, Tunable band topology and optical conductivity in altermagnets, Physical Review B110, 024425 (2024)

    2024

  8. [16]

    L. D. Landau, L. Pitaevskii, and E. Lifshitz,Electrodynamics of continuous media, V ol. 8 (elsevier, 2013) p. 348

    2013

  9. [17]

    Viola and D

    G. Viola and D. P. DiVincenzo, Hall effect gyrators and circu- lators, Phys. Rev. X4, 021019 (2014)

    2014

  10. [18]

    P. J. Besser, A. H. Morrish, and C. W. Searle, Magnetocrys- talline anisotropy of pure and doped hematite, Phys. Rev.153, 632 (1967)

    1967

  11. [19]

    S. Park, H. Jang, J.-Y . Kim, B.-G. Park, T.-Y . Koo, and J.- 10 H. Park, Strain control of morin temperature in epitaxialα- Fe2O3(0001) film, Europhysics Letters103, 27007 (2013)

    2013

  12. [20]

    K. Mibu, K. Mikami, M. Tanaka, R. Masuda, Y . Yoda, and M. Seto, Thickness dependence of morin transition tempera- ture in iridium-doped hematite layers studied through nuclear resonant scattering, Hyperfine Interactions238, 92 (2017)

    2017

  13. [21]

    H. Jani, J. Linghu, S. Hooda, R. V . Chopdekar, C. Li, G. J. Omar, S. Prakash, Y . Du, P. Yang, A. Banas, K. Banas, S. Ghosh, S. Ojha, G. R. Umapathy, D. Kanjilal, A. Ariando, S. J. Pennycook, E. Arenholz, P. G. Radaelli, J. M. D. Coey, Y . P. Feng, and T. Venkatesan, Reversib...

    2021

  14. [22]

    Scheufele, J

    M. Scheufele, J. G ¨uckelhorn, M. Opel, A. Kamra, H. Huebl, R. Gross, S. Gepr ¨ags, and M. Althammer, Impact of growth conditions on magnetic anisotropy and magnon Hanle effect in α-Fe2O3, APL Materials11, 091115 (2023)

    2023

  15. [23]

    Nordlander, M

    J. Nordlander, M. A. Anderson, C. M. Brooks, M. E. Holtz, and J. A. Mundy, Epitaxy of hexagonal ABO3 quantum materials, Applied Physics Reviews9, 031309 (2022)

    2022

  16. [24]

    X. Li, Y . Yun, and X. Xu, Recent progress on multiferroic hexagonal rare-earth ferrites (h-RFeO 3 , R=Y, Dy-Lu), Jour- nal of Physics D: Applied Physics58, 073003 (2025)

    2025

  17. [25]

    Lilienblum, T

    M. Lilienblum, T. Lottermoser, S. Manz, S. M. Selbach, A. Cano, and M. Fiebig, Ferroelectricity in the multiferroic hexagonal manganites, Nature Physics11, 1070 (2015)

    2015

  18. [26]

    Schoenherr, L

    P. Schoenherr, L. M. Giraldo, M. Lilienblum, M. Trassin, D. Meier, and M. Fiebig, Magnetoelectric force microscopy on antiferromagnetic 180◦ domains in Cr 2O3, Materials10, 1051 (2017)

    2017

  19. [27]

    Rivera, A short review of the magnetoelectric effect and re- lated experimental techniques on single phase (multi-) ferroics, The European Physical Journal B71, 299 (2009)

    J.-P. Rivera, A short review of the magnetoelectric effect and re- lated experimental techniques on single phase (multi-) ferroics, The European Physical Journal B71, 299 (2009)

    2009

  20. [28]

    Eerenstein, M

    W. Eerenstein, M. Wiora, J. Prieto, J. Scott, and N. Mathur, Giant sharp and persistent converse magnetoelectric effects in multiferroic epitaxial heterostructures, Nature materials6, 348 (2007)

    2007

  21. [29]

    N. A. Pertsev, H. Kohlstedt, and B. Dkhil, Strong enhancement of the direct magnetoelectric effect in strained ferroelectric- ferromagnetic thin-film heterostructures, Phys. Rev. B80, 054102 (2009)

    2009

Pith tools

Reviewed August 1, 2026 · model on record in the stance chip above.